Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Does this proposal offer clear and significant lines of inquiry? A limited and focused topic? A specific
audience? A legitimate exigency? A credible sense of ethos? A felt impact or complex dominant impression (pathos)?
Reasoning?
Specific audience of college-aged individuals and millennial women.
Limited focus topic touching base about why/how divorce isnt always a bad thing.
Exigency would be to help millennials realize that there is more to life than falling in love
and even if you get a divorce, that is not always the worst possible outcome. (More freedom and
opportunity).
To what extent does the sample fulfill the proposal assignment criteria?
See Canvas (Areas include: topic, problem, interest, context, exigency, audience, openended discovery)
What aspects did you find most engaging and interesting in the proposal?
The background story/introduction was a good way to start the paper because it draws the
individual in and hooks them to read the rest. A lot of people could relate to the introduction because it draws
on pathos.
What aspects did you find less cohesive, clear, comprehensible?
Nothing too incomprehensible, but it seems as though the writing should have had more
substance included throughout. Her research could have been expanded greater to better emphasize her
thoughts and POV.
To what extent does the lead and ending of the topic proposal operate to advance the objectives of the
proposal?
What questions, challenges or areas of inquiry do you think this proposal might have addressed or developed
further?
How different religions view divorces?
Are there difference between same sex and traditional marriages?
What critical questions can you offer this proposal?
What are some potential roadblocks that it should avoid as it progresses in its inquiry, discovery, and research
work next?
Other thoughts or features you noticed?
Be specific in the explanations of your questions.