Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. Lecturer JKUAT
2. Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology, Nairobi CBD Campus
ABSTRACT
The main objective of the study is to establish the effect of quality management practice on the firm
performance of animal feeds manufacturers in Kiambu and Nairobi counties. The study sought to
establish the objectives of the influence of supplier management, continuous process improvement,
and continuous product improvement, strategic quality planning and statistical quality control on the
firm performance. The theoretical models that used in the study included the Resource Based View
Theory, Diffusion of Innovations Theory, Agency Theory and Knowledge Based View Theory. The
study applied the descriptive research design. While a purposive sampling technique was used to
gather qualitative and quantitative data from employees of the
manufacturers in Kiambu and Nairobi counties, with a total sample size will be 110 respondents.
The reliability of the questionnaires was checked using Cronbach Alpha test. Quantitative data
collected was analyzed using both descriptive statistics and inferential statistics, in descriptive
statistics data was summarized using percentages, mean and standard deviation while in inferential
statistics multiple regression analysis method was used. The study findings show that there is a
significant positive relationship between supplier management, process improvement, product
improvement, and strategic quality planning, statistical quality control with firm performance of
animal feed manufactures in Kiambu and Nairobi counties. Its recommended that management team
of animal feed manufactures should engage more in strategic quality planning through regularly
conducting market research on quality perspective thus to gain relevant information from clients
and competitors to enhance in
financial terms.
The study recommends that the management team from the animal feed
manufactures should also continuous engage in providing innovative solutions for firms products
thus to meet customer demand specifications in the market. Lastly, the study recommends that further
studies be done on the impacts of effective implementation of quality management practices on firm
performance of various animal feed manufacturers in the country thus to depict a reliable result that
can be employed in improving the firm by focusing both negative and positive effects.
CHAPTER ONE
1.1 Background of the Study
Quality management practice has emerged as a high profile notion that has strategic importance to
many manufacturing companies. Many manufacturing companies are taking direct steps to
practice quality management initiatives thus increase non-financial and financial results
(Salaheldin, 2010). Chong and Rundus (2012) highlighted that quality management practice as
an effective system for integrating the quality development, quality maintenance and quality
improvement efforts of the various groups in the company so as to enable production and service
at the most economical levels which allows for full customer satisfaction.
Implementation of quality management practices enables companies to improve their internal
operations in an efficient manner; this is however considered a requirement to become
competitive in the global market place. Smith (2012) pointed out that quality management
practice is a major factor in the business quality revolution that has proven itself to be one of
the 21 centurys most powerful creators of sales & revenue growth, genuinely good new jobs,
and soundly based and sustainable businesses expansion.
1.1.1 Global Perspectives on Quality Management Practices
Globally, the concept of quality management practices can be viewed from different perspectives.
Hardie (2013) identifies the following five categories into which quality management practices
can be placed; conformance to requirement, fitness for purpose, meeting customer perceptions,
exceeding customer expectations and superior to competitor.
Slack et al. (2010) affirms that quality management practices should be thought of as a philosophy
and a way of thinking and working which particularly stresses the following; meeting the needs
and expectations of customers, covering all parts of the company, including every person in the
company, examining all costs which are related to quality, especially failure costs, getting things
right first time, developing a continuous process of improvement and developing the systems
and procedures which support quality and improvement.
Abdullah et al., (2010) notes that Total Quality Management (TQM) in Africa can be implemented
in any sector of the economy for instance the public sector, manufacturing, service and education.
The resulting outcome is reduced costs, increased productivity, and improved financial
performance.
prescriptions have been in an attempt to reverse the trend of high failure rate in implementing
quality management practices among the manufacturing industries (Chinho et al., (2007); Heras
and Landin, 2011; Samson and Terziovski (2011). Taylor and Wright (2003) argues many firm
in manufacturing sector fail because of quality management practice implementation barriers such
supplier quality management and lack of continuous product improvements.
In Kenya, animal feeds manufacturing industries growth is slow yet the annually demand high
which is not met (AKEFEMA, 2015). While the Kenyan consumers are becoming increasingly
more enlightened and are always expecting good quality products from the manufacturers. There
is evidence that successful quality management practices among the manufacturing industries is
inadequate (Kibe and Wanjau, 2014).
Existing local studies such as Nyamamba (2013) and Awino et al. (2012) have not incorporated
all the key quality management practices in a single study to comprehensively analyze the effect
of quality management practices on performance, more specifically on the animal feeds
manufacturers in Kiambu and Nairobi counties. Thus it`s on this background the researcher sought
to investigate the effect of quality management practices on firm performance with a view in
offering feasible recommendations to improve animal feed manufacturing industry in Kenya.
Therefore filling the existing knowledge gap.
ii.
iii.
iv.
To examine the effect of strategic quality planning on firm performance of animal feed
manufactures.
v.
To investigate
phenomena by specifying relationship among variables with the purpose of explaining natural
phenomena. While Gill and Johnson (2002) defined theory as a formulation regarding the cause
and effect relationships between two or more variables, which may or may not have been tested.
The study was based on the following theories; Resource Based View Theory, Diffusion of
Innovations Theory, Agency Theory and Knowledge Based View Theory.
Qualified suppliers
Supplier partnership
Supplier feedback
Financial
net profits
return on investments
Non-financial
Continuous Product Improvement
market share
customers complaints
customer satisfaction
Operational
Product inspection
Innovative solution
Cost of production
Product improvement policies
operation defects
waste materials
cost production
Mission statement
Market research
Best practice
Short and long-term goals
Control charts
Statistical
training
programs
periodic quality audits
Independent Variable
Dependent Variable
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.1 Introduction
Research methodology is a way to systematically solve the research problem. This chapter
provides the methodology that was used in the study. It includes the research design, target
population, sampling design, data collection instruments, validity and reliability. This chapter also
discuss how data analysis and presentation styles that were used in the study.
Thus the study sampled 2 respondents each from the 55 different animal feed manufacturing firms
located in the Kiambu and Nairobi counties. Thus making a total sample size of 110 respondents.
The respondents included both the procurement manager and the operational managers. Morse
(2000) recommended a sample size above 100 is adequate for carrying out a case study. Therefore
a sample size of 110 respondents was adequate to research the effect of quality management
practices on firm performance of animal feed manufacturers in Kiambu and Nairobi counties.
Secondary literature review data for the research was collected by reviewing textbooks, journals
and articles. Cooper and Schindler (2003) suggested secondary data is a useful qualitative
technique for evaluating historical or contemporary confidential or public records, reports,
government documents and opinions.
questionnaire, if the instructions where clear, if there is any question unclear or ambiguous, if
there has been any major topic omitted, if the layout of the questionnaire is clear or comments to
add. Pilot test was thus a crucial step before conducting the final research.
the extent to which the researcher is able to study what he or she had sought to study rather than
studying something else. Thus researcher validity test was the extent to which the respondent
instrument gives the correct answer.
In the Table 3.1 above show the results were indicate that supplier quality management had a
reliability of (0.653), continuous process improvement (0.550), continuous product improvement
(0.589), strategic quality planning (0.628), statistical quality control (0.524) and lastly firm
performance (0.845). The highest instrument had
lowest had a reliability of 0.524 this implied that all instruments of the study were reliable for
measurement.
The coefficient is high when its absolute value is greater than or equal to 0.7 otherwise it is low
(Sekaran, 2010). Field (2009) argues that a cronbachs Alpha value equal or great than 0.5 is
regarded to be an indication of reliability.
Number
of Cronbach Alpha
score
Items
Conclusion
0.653
Reliable
0.550
Reliable
0.589
Reliable
0.628
Reliable
0.524
Reliable
Firm performance
0.845
Reliable
The descriptive statistics was analyzed using qualitative data which was represented in the form
of percentages, mean and standard deviation. Inferential analysis was represented using correlation
analysis, factor analysis and regression analysis. The regression analysis was used to analyses the
degree of relationship between two variables i.e. quality management practice and firm
performance.
11
For most academic studies involving top management or company representatives, a response rate
of approximately 35 per cent is reasonable (Baruch, 2004). Saunders et al., (2007) suggest that an
average response rate of 30% to 40% is reasonable. Mugenda (2008) state that a 40% response
rate is unreliable, 50% is adequate, 60% good and above 70% is rated as very good. While Sekaran
and Bougier (2009) recommends that a response rate of approximately 60% for most research
should be the goal of researchers. Based on these assertions, this implies that the response rate for
this study was adequate. Figure 4.1 below illustrate the level of response rate.
12
SA
4.5
35.8
43.3
16.4
3.72
1.5
14.9
58.2
25.4
4.07
7.5
55.2
37.3
4.30
4.5
40.3
40.3
14.9
3.66
1.5
32.8
50.7
14.9
3.79
34.3
49.3
7.5
3.55
1.5
26.9
43.3
22.4
3.04
Average
Mean
3.73
13
SA
22.4
23.9
29.9
17.9
3.31
7.5
20.9
49.3
22.4
3.87
38.8
31.3
20.9
3.64
14.9
7.5
23.9
53.7
4.16
53.7
40.3
4.34
Average
Mean
3.864
14
D
%
N
%
A
%
SA
%
7.5
37.3
40.3
14.9
3.63
7.5
43.3
35.8
13.4
3.55
26.9
45.3
22.4
3. 04
53.7
31.3
3.34
1.5
10.4
37.3
35.8
14.9
3.52
17.9
58.2
23.9
4.06
19.4
50.7
29.9
4.10
Average
Mean
3. 606
15
D
%
N
%
A
%
SA
%
Mean
41.8
40.3
17.9
3.76
11.9
64.2
23.9
4.12
1.5
32.8
52.2
13.4
3.78
38.8
44.8
13.4
3.69
32.8
47.4
19.4
3.87
13.4
35.8
32.8
14.9
3.70
13.4
47.8
38.8
3.25
Average
3.7386
16
SA
10.4
29.9
43.3
16.4
2.72
28.4
40.3
22.4
3.00
29.4
46.3
14.9
7.5
2.96
4.5
25.4
47.8
22.4
2.88
10.4
34.3
43.3
11.9
2.57
2. 826
17
Mean
SA
Mean
11.9
35.8
28.4
23.9
3.64
28.4
55.2
16.4
2.79
28.4
47.8
14.9
2.93
1.5
20.9
43.3
34.3
4.10
4.5
31.8
36.9
26.9
3.76
35.8
29.9
28.4
3.81
41.3
32.8
20.9
3.69
Average
3.53
The cell in this table are factor loadings which gives values over 0.5 and none is more than 0.951
implying linear relationship, interval or near interval data lack of high multi-collinearity. Bryman
and Cramer (2011) suggested that any factor loading below 0.4 is weak
and 0.6 are moderate. While values which are less than 0.3, the results of the factor analysis
probably will not be very useful in the research.
18
Factor analysis generates a Table 4.8 in which the rows are the observed indicator variables and
the columns are factors or latent variables which explains as much of the variance in these variables
as possible.
CPI
CPDI
SQP
SQC
0.882
0.700
0.627
0.565
0.887
0.602
0.521
0.792
0.737
0.647
0.540
0.525
0.741
0.536
0.654
0.578
0.695
0.505
0.570
0.746
0.702
0.758
0.730
0.881
0.869
0.749
0.937
19
0.942
0.951
0.700
0.931
Thus from the study findings it can be concluded that statistical quality control variables have the
lowest effect in influencing the firm performance of animal feeds manufacturers. While continuous
product improvement variables have the strongest effect in influencing the firm performance of
animal feeds manufacturers.
Table
4.9:
Summary
of
Correlations
Dependent Variables
FP
SQM
CPRI
Statistics
CPDI
of
Independent
SQP
Firm
performance
Supplier qual
ity management
0.259**
Continuous pro
cess improvement
0.392**
0.486**
Continuous pro
duct improvement
0.242** 0.606**
0.521**
Strategic quality
y planning
0.110**
0.370**
0.195**
0.291**
Statistical quality
control
0.407**
0.201**
0.194**
0.140**
0.052**
and
SQC
20
0.519
R Square
0. 665
Adjusted
R Square
Std Error of
the Estimates
Change Statistics
F Change
Sig.F
Change
0. 645
0.45246
34.624
0.001
DurbinWaston
1.631
21
df
Regression
Sum
of Square
4.606
Means
Squares
0.921
Residual
12.488
61
0.205
Total
17.094
66
Sig.
34.624
. 001
How does
manufactures. The study results on Table 4.12 accepted the research question as evidence of
2=0.321, <0.05. This infer that continuous process improvement has a positive relationship
effect on the firm performance of animal feed manufactures. The statement is supported by the ttest of 4. 723. Thus failure by animal feed manufactures to practice continuous process
improvement in their operations will impact negatively on their performance both financial, non
financial and operational performance.
22
How does
manufactures. The study results on Table 4.12 accepted the research question as evidence of
3=0.303, <0.05. This infer that continuous product improvement has a positive relationship
effect on the firm performance of animal feeds manufactures in Kiambu and Nairobi counties.
The statement is supported by the t-test of 4.598.
How does
study results on Table 4.12 accepted the research question as evidence of (4 =0.242, p < 0.05).
This infer that strategic quality planning has a positive relationship effect on the firm performance
of animal feed manufactures. The statement is supported by the t-test of 3.331.
How does statistical quality control has on firm performance of animal feed manufactures. The
study results on Table 4.12 show statistical quality control has a positive relationship effect on
firm performance of animal feed manufactures as evidence of (5 = 0.258, p < 0.05). The
statement is supported by the t-test of 3.479.
This infer that supplier quality management contributed the most in improvement of firm
performance of animal feed manufacturers, continuous process improvement become second,
continuous product improvement become third, while statistical quality control become fourth and
lastly strategy quality planning contribute the least in influence of firm performance of the animal
feeds manufactures in Kiambu and Nairobi counties.
23
Standardized Coefficients
Std.
Error
Beta
Sig.
1.702
1.000
(Constant)
1.188
0.698
Supplier Quality
Management
0.337
0.070
0.337
4.816
0.000
Continuous Process
Improvement
0.321
0.068
0.321
4.723
0.000
Continuous Product
Improvement
0.303
0.066
0.303
4.598
0.000
Statistical Quality
Control
0. 258
0.074
0.258
3.479
0.001
Strategic Quality
Planning
0.242
0.073
0.337
3.331
0.000
24
25
The researcher recommends further studies should be done be done on the impacts of effective
implementation of quality management practices on firm performance of various animal feed
manufacturers in the country thus to depict a reliable result that can be employed in improving
the firm by focusing both negative and positive effects.
REFERENCE
Abdullah, S., Golhar, D.Y & Waller, M.A (2010). Development and validation of TQM
implementation constructs in Africa. Journal of Decision Sciences, 27(1), 23-56
Adams, G. & Schvaneveldt, J. (2011). Understanding Research Methods. (2nd Ed). New York:
Longman.
Awino, Z. A., Muchara, M., Ogutu, M. & Oeba, K. L. (2012). Total quality and competitive
advantage of firms in the horticultural industry in Kenya. Prime Journal of Business
Administration and Management, 2(4), 521-532.
Bryman, A. & Cramer, D. (2011). Quantitative Data Analysis with SPSS Release 18 for
Windows. London: Routledge.
Chinho, L., Wing, S. C., Madu, J., Kuei, H. & Pei, Y. (2007). A structural equation model
of supply chain quality management and organizational performance, International Journal
of Production Economics, 96(5), 355365.
Chong, V. K. & Rundus, M. J. (2012). Total quality management, market competition and
organizational performance. British Accounting Review, 36, 155-172.
Chong, V.K. & Rundus, M. J. (2004). Total quality management, market competition and
organizational performance. British Accounting Review, 36:155-72.
26
Collis, J. & Hussey, R. (2009). Business Research A Practical Guide for Undergraduate and
Postgraduate Students. (2nd Ed). Basingstoke: Macmillan Business.
Dong, Y., Corter, R. & Dresner, M. (2001). Just in time purchasing and performance: an
exploratory analysis of buyer and supplier perspectives. Journal of Operations Management,
19, 471-483.
Feigenbaum, A. V. (2009). Total Quality Control. (5th Ed). McGraw-Hill Book Company;
New York, NY.
Kibe, E. N. & Wanjau, K. (2014). The effect of quality management systems on the
performance of food processing firms in Kenya. Journal of Business and Management, 16(5),
61-72.
Gill, J. & Johnson, P. (2002). Research Methods for Manager. (3rd Ed). London: Sage.
Hardie, N. (2013). The effects of quality management on business performance. Journal of
Quality Management, 5(2), 65-83.
Heras, I. S. & Landin, G. A. (2011). The impact of quality management in European
companies performance The case of the Spanish companies, Journal of European
Business Review, 18(2), 114-131.
Marshall, C. & Rossman, G.B. (2010). Designing Qualitative Research (4th Ed). Thousand Oaks,
CA: Sage.
Masood, H. & Mukhtar, A. (2012). Impact of TQM practices on firms performance of
Pakistans manufacturing organizations. International Journal of Academic Research in
Business and Social Sciences, 2(10), 232-260.
McNeill, P. (2005). Business Research Methods. (3rd Ed). London: Routledge.
Morse, J. M. (2000). Determining sample size. Journal of Qualitative Health Research,
10(1), 3-5.
Mugenda, A. G. (2008). Social Science Research; Theory and Principles. Nairobi, ARTS
press.
Nyamamba, M. E. (2013). An exploratory study of quality management issues in the health
service sector in Nairobi, Kenya.
Robson, C. (2002). Real World Research. (2nd Ed). Oxford: Blackwell.
Salaheldin, S. I. (2010). Critical success factors for TQM implementation and their impact
on performance of SMEs. International Journal of Productivity and Performance
Management, 58 (3), 215-237.
27
Saunders, N., Thornhill, A. & Stead, J. (2007). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods.
(3rd Ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Sekaran, U. & Bougie, R. (2009). Research Methods for Business. (5th Ed). Wiley publication.
th
Sekaran, U. (2010). Research Methods for Business (4 Ed). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Slack, N., Chambers, S. & Johnston, R. (2010). Operations Management. (5th
Prentice Hall.
Ed).
28