Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SPE
SPE 14517
A Study of Reservoir Parameters
West Virginia
Affecting
Gas we!!
spacing
in
by K. Aminian, S. Ameri, and M.S. Saradji, * West Virginia U., and C.D. Locke, BDM Corp.
Now with U.S. DOE/METC
SPE Members
Abstract
Introduction
A STUDY OF RESERVOIR
PARAMETERS AFFECTING
SPE 14517
IN WEST VIRGINIA
where:
Gas flow in reservoirs has been discussed in
literally
hundreds of technicalpapers over the past
of fieici
data has been presented
40 year=. A W-eaitii
mathematical
with
increasingly complex
along
treatments.
The
partial differentialequations
describing gas flow in a porous medium is given
below:
v(w)
- 0 ~
(1)
us
PM
j--T
K Cip
- 6.328 --z
(3)
(4)
(8)
f,;
(Ji
-.
in ~
~%1
+ i=l Qi In ~e
iZj
I
(9)
where:
(5)
Pe
= reservoirpressure
f1ow rate
Qi
z
Equation 5 is essentiallythe diffusivityequation in
ri
= well bore radius
terms of real gas potential. This equation is,
rii = distancebetween the WaIIS
ao~d~~~
=X~SX.S.
however, non-!inearand no ana!yticd
r:
= reservoirradius
Equation 5 is solved numericallyby finite-difference ~=
-.
.. i1ity
...-
permeab
techniques in reservoirsimiiitors,
h=
thickness
B=
formation volume factor
It has long been establishedthat Darcys Law
viscosity
P=
(Equation 4) becomes inadequate in describing high
velocity g$jas flow
through
porous
media.
Upon applying Equation 9 to 2 wells,of spacing
Forchheimer proposed the followingequation:
d2 and common well radius of rw and pressure of
Pw, the interferenceeffect (which is expressed by
dp
.- . PV
~--+ @pi/z
(6)
the
total flux capacity from the two wells to two
dL
non-interferingwells)may be expressed as:
The firstterm on the right-hand side is the Darcy
Q~+Q.2
or viscous wmponent while the second is a high
ln(re/rw)
productivity
index ratio = -
= -----velocity or non-Darcy component.
In this latter
(lo)
2Q0
term, # is the velocitycoefficientor coefficientof
rinertial resistance. This term has been called
turbulence factor and
correlated with
the
permeability by Katz and Corne114 and ~tz and
and for four wellsin square pattern of side d4:
Janicek5. The high velocitycomponent in Equation 6
is negligibleat low flow velocitiesand is generally
ln(re/rw)
productivity _
_ -
Q1+QPW9
= --.---... .
omitted from liquid flow equations. For a given
(11)
index
ratio
re4
4Q0
pressure draw-down, however, the velocityof gas is
in
at leastan order of magnitude greater than for oil,
/Zrwd;
[1
because of the low density of gas, The high-velocity
component.is,therefore,always included in equations
Muskat carried through similar applications to
describing the flow of real gas through a porous
groups of 5, 9, and 16 wells. The same principles
medium.
had been utilizedby Dereiewaki9 tQ determine the
effectiveflow for gas reservoirs. The modifiedform
The p~eudo-steady-statesolutionof Equation 5
of the Mus kat Equation for gas wellsis as follows:
for radial flow when the non-Darcy effects are
included is given below:
in192
[1
SPE 14517
K. AMINIAN,
S.
AMERI,
M.S.
Data Collection
and Analysis
Methodology
.nA
properties on ~p.~~~f$~~pa~~
-..
~p=c~r,
&am
--reservoirs. Considerablework has been accomplished
and reported in the literature.In order to minimize
duplication of effort, GAS
3D2 (Sawyer 1983)
simulatorwas obtained. Using this simulatoras the
starting point, changes to reflect the effect of
non-Darey flow in the reservoirwere madel1*12 since
it was believed that the non-Darcy effects in gas
reservoirsare important to consider.
During the study of well interference,
it became
Qp.~y
2.
3.
A STUDY OF RESERVOIR
PARAMETERS AFFECTING
SPE 14517
-.
IN WEST VIRGINIA
~cmpietueiyk.mmgaeci-us ail
d uriiforin
reservoir for
such a situationto occur, it is necessary to have
the same distancebetween the wells. Otherwise,the
performance of the individualwellswould be inferior
to a single well (interferenceeffects). Howevefi,if
the reservoiris heterogeneous and non-uniform,the
distance between the wells should be decided based
on the characteristics
of various segments of the
reservoir. Based on the average characteristics
of
the two formations,Figures 8 and 9 were developed
using uniform spacing model (based on Equation 7).
the allowable flow rate
These
figures show
(estimated as 25% of AOF ) versus the distance
between the well (twicethe drainage radius).
..
.a.e~]
ir=w
~f
--
W-MC*I
SPE 14517
K. AMINIAN,
S.
AMERI,
s=
T=
~=
v=
P
0=
P
P
=
=
=
M.S.
10.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Muakat,
M., 1946,The Flow of Homofleneoug
g~!d~.~.h~~g.~h.
Poroug, J.W. Edward8, Inc.,Ann
Arbor, Michigan.
8.
9.
12. Sarad.ii.
M.S.,A TheoreticalStudy of Different.
Reser~oir Parameters AffectingGas Well
Deliverability
and Spacing in West Virginia,
Masters thesis,West V}rginiaUniversity,
Department of Petroleum Engineering,
Morgantown, WV, (under preparation),1985.
Forchheimer,
P., 1901,Wasserbewegung durch
Boden, ZZ~tz,ver deutach, ~,
45, 1731.
Referenqe&
3.
LOCKE
SPE
14517
TABLE I
PARAMETER
BIG
MEAN
95%
L.L.
IOOROS
ITY
(%)
THICKNESS
(FT)
(MD)
PERMEABILITY
BENSON
INJUN
Cir,
.
95%
MEAN
L,L,
UiLi
CII,
U,L,
11.96
11,56
12,36
8,51
8,21
8,81
18.97
15,51
22,43
10,32
8,50
12,14
66,83
65,26
68.40
67s 41
65,69
69,14
10,10
172.33
2024,40
8.084
169,66
1945s 68
12,04
5,20
3,86
6.37
213,12
35,80
28,11
43.41
4284,54
4169,70
4399,40
2103.12
25000
20000
15e00
10000
5000
e
0
200
4@e
660
(0/J%4]jOU
M014
N3d0
(x)om
ZllnlOSSW
801tmw1s
30 s17ns3ti
\\\\N-
(0/J~W)40tl
MOld
N3d0
3LITIO!33H
W
(ZIOW13kiolu7nwIs
40 sllns3~
450
400
350
300
250
RESERVIJIR
Fig.5-Effecf
RWJIUS, FT
Distance
500
\
4s0
400-
350.
1 I
~---&-f-l-f1s00
Dlstence
The
lblls.
ft
550
Betueen
De
fIL
2000