Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Plant and Environmental Sciences, Goteborg University, Box 461, SE-40530 Goteborg, Sweden
Lilla Hajumsgatan 4, SE-46135 Trollhattan, Sweden
article info
abstract
Article history:
inferred by use of ITS and LSU nu-rDNA sequence data. Lycoperdaceae was confirmed as
monophyletic, and Mycenastrum corium as a sister taxon to the ingroup. Four major clades
19 September 2007
were identified and received weak to moderate support and correspond with the genera
Lycoperdon, Bovista, Calvatia, and Disciseda. The Lycoperdon clade includes species from Lyco-
Corresponding Editor:
perdon, Vascellum, Morganella, Handkea, Bovistella, and Calvatia. The structure within the
David L. Hawksworth
Lycoperdon clade is unresolved and several clades are more or less unsupported, which suggests treating the supported Lycoperdon clade as the genus Lycoperdon. L. nigrescens and
Keywords:
L. caudatum occur on single branches and their phylogenetic positions could not be re-
Agaricales
Basidiomycota
six species of Calvatia, and two species of Disciseda. In Lycoperdon three new species were
Gasteromycetes
recognized. A new species closely related to B. limosa is identified and discussed. A classi-
Molecular systematics
Taxonomy
Morphological characters of species within and among identified clades are discussed.
2007 The British Mycological Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Introduction
The puffball family Lycoperdaceae includes species with
enclosed basidiocarps and a pure white gleba that at maturity
turns into a brown powder of trillions of spores, puffing out
from the apical opening of the endoperidium. The species
have a saprotrophic habit, either growing on dead wood, or
on the ground in forest or open grassland. The family comprises about 150 species worldwide (Kirk et al. 2001) and in
general the species have a wide distribution range.
Lycoperdaceae has traditionally been classified in the Gasteromycetes as one of the families of Lycoperdales (Demoulin 1968;
Demoulin 1969; Dring 1973; Kreisel 1969a; Pegler et al. 1995;
* Corresponding author.
E-mail address: ellen.larsson@dpes.gu.se
0953-7562/$ see front matter 2007 The British Mycological Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.mycres.2007.10.018
Phylogeny of Lycoperdaceae
Material studied
Most studied specimens originate from Fennoscandia or Iceland whereas a few complimentary samples were collected in
south and central Europe, Asia (Russia and Nepal), Greenland,
E. Larsson, M. Jeppson
Table 1 Data of specimens sequenced in this study, named according to the proposed molecular based classification
Proposed taxonomy
Bovista aestivalis
Bovista aestivalis
Bovista cretacea
Bovista cretacea
Bovista furfuracea
Bovista graveolens
Bovista limosa
Bovista cfr limosa
Bovista nigrescens
Bovista paludosa
Bovista plumbea
Bovista promontorii
Bovista tomentosa
Bovista tomentosa
Calvatia candida
Calvatia craniiformis
Calvatia gigantea
Disciseda bovista
Disciseda candida
Lycoperdon altimontanum
Lycoperdon altimontanum
Lycoperdon atropurpureum
Lycoperdon atropurpureum
Lycoperdon atropurpureum
Lycoperdon caudatum
Lycoperdon cretaceum
Lycoperdon cretaceum
Lycoperdon decipiens
Lycoperdon decipiens
Lycoperdon dermoxanthum
Lycoperdon echinatum
Lycoperdon ericaeum
Lycoperdon ericaeum
Lycoperdon excipuliforme
Lycoperdon frigidum
Lycoperdon frigidum
Lycoperdon frigidum
Lycoperdon frigidum
Lycoperdon frigidum
Lycoperdon frigidum
Lycoperdon lambinonii
Lycoperdon lambinonii
Lycoperdon lividum
Lycoperdon lividum
Lycoperdon mammiforme
Lycoperdon marginatum
Lycoperdon molle
Lycoperdon molle
Lycoperdon muscorum
Lycoperdon nigrescens
Lycoperdon niveum
Lycoperdon niveum
Lycoperdon niveum
Lycoperdon niveum
Lycoperdon cfr niveum
Lycoperdon norvegicum
Lycoperdon perlatum
Lycoperdon pratense
Lycoperdon pratense
Lycoperdon pratense
Lycoperdon pyrifome
Lycoperdon radicatum
Lycoperdon sp. 1
Lycoperdon sp. 1
Origin
Collection ID
Herbarium
Sweden
Sweden
Iceland
Norway
Sweden
Sweden
Sweden
Sweden
Sweden
Norway
Sweden
Spain
Sweden
USA
Hungary
USA
Sweden
Sweden
Sweden
Norway
Nepal
Sweden
Sweden
Sweden
Sweden
Iceland
Norway
Sweden
Sweden
Sweden
Sweden
Sweden
Sweden
Sweden
Greenland
Iceland
Norway
Norway
Svalbard
Sweden
Belgium
Norway
Sweden
Nepal
Sweden
USA
Norway
Sweden
Sweden
Sweden
Iceland
Iceland
Iceland
Norway
Sweden
Sweden
Sweden
Czechia
Russia
Sweden
Sweden
USA
Norway
Norway
M. Jeppson 1122
M. Jeppson 3860
Hallgrmsson 11622
M. Jeppson 5702
M. Jeppson 5435
Widgren 030816
M. Jeppson 5226
M. Jeppson 3971
M. Jeppson 7719
M. Jeppson 4301
M. Jeppson 4856
M. Jeppson 7770
M. Jeppson 5433
Steinke 951015
M. Jeppson 3514
Steinke 001017
M. Jeppson 3566
M. Jeppson 5078
M. Jeppson 3588
M. Jeppson 4270
Dobremezdholotypus
M. Jeppson 3269
M. Jeppson 3269
M. Jeppson 6150
R-G. Carlsson 920818
M. Jeppson 4105
M. Jeppson 4302
M. Jeppson 4330
M. Jeppson 7715
M. Jeppson 4568
M. Jeppson 6498
M. Jeppson 4866
M. Jeppson 5395
M. Jeppson 6467
Lange 901009
M. Jeppson 4088
Eckblad 151507
M. Jeppson 4273
Lange 191
M. Jeppson 7716
Demoulin 4622
M. Jeppson 5245
M. Jeppson 4005
Dobremez 19740514
M. Jeppson 4841
Anderson & Parker 750822
M. Jeppson 4260
M. Jeppson 4557
M. Jeppson 7717
M. Jeppson 5376
M. Jeppson 4068
M. Jeppson 4109
M. Jeppson 484
M. Jeppson 5267
M. Jeppson 5594
M. Jeppson 5453
M. Jeppson 4684
M. Jeppson 5880
S-A. Hanson 20000915
M. Jeppson 4864
M. Jeppson 4849
Parker 970911
M. Jeppson 4277
M. Jeppson 4285
GB
GB
AMNH
GB
GB
GB
GB
GB
GB
GB
GB
GB
GB
GB
GB
GB
GB
GB
GB
GB
Herb. Kreisel
GB
GB
GB
GB
GB
GB
GB
GB
GB
GB
GB
GB
GB
C
GB
O
GB
C
GB
GB
GB
GB
Herb. Kreisel
GB
GB
GB
GB
GB
GB
GB
GB
GB
GB
GB
GB
GB
GB
GB
GB
GB
GB
GB
GB
DQ112620
DQ112619
DQ112611
DQ112610
DQ112622
DQ112618
DQ112615
DQ112614
DQ112612
DQ112609
DQ112613
DQ112621
DQ112616
DQ112617
DQ112624
DQ112625
DQ112623
DQ112627
DQ112626
DQ122588
DQ112589
DQ112586
DQ112586
DQ112587
DQ112633
DQ112597
DQ112598
DQ112582
DQ112583
DQ112579
DQ112578
DQ112606
DQ112605
DQ112590
DQ112563
DQ112564
DQ112560
DQ112562
DQ112559
DQ112561
DQ112575
DQ112576
DQ112600
DQ112599
DQ112567
DQ112632
DQ122566
DQ112565
DQ112604
DQ122577
DQ112571
DQ112570
DQ112568
DQ112569
DQ112572
DQ112631
DQ112630
DQ112556
DQ112555
DQ112554
DQ112558
DQ112608
DQ112574
DQ112573
Phylogeny of Lycoperdaceae
Table 1 (continued)
Proposed taxonomy
Lycoperdon sp. 2
Lycoperdon sp. 2
Lycoperdon sp. 2
Lycoperdon sp. 3
Lycoperdon sp. 3
Lycoperdon turneri
Lycoperdon turneri
Lycoperdon turneri
Lycoperdon umbrinum
Lycoperdon umbrinum
Lycoperdon umbrinum
Lycoperdon utriforme
Mycenastrum corium
Tulostoma kotlabae
Tulostoma squamosum
Origin
Sweden
Sweden
Sweden
Norway
Sweden
Greenland
Norway
Norway
Sweden
Sweden
Sweden
Sweden
Sweden
Hungary
Austria
Collection ID
M. Jeppson 6377
M. Jeppson 6394
L. Orstadius 148-03
M. Jeppson 4304
Vetter 407
Lange 08-95
M. Jeppson 4265
M. Jeppson 5251
M. Jeppson 4556
M. Jeppson 4556a
M. Jeppson 4559
M. Jeppson 5388
M. Jeppson 5467
M. Jeppson 6623
Mrazek 1300
Herbarium
GB
GB
GB
GB
GB
C
GB
GB
GB
GB
GB
GB
GB
GB
GB
DQ112602
DQ112601
DQ112603
DQ112580
DQ112581
DQ112596
DQ112595
DQ112594
DQ112591
DQ112593
DQ112592
DQ112607
DQ112628
DQ112629
DQ415732
E. Larsson, M. Jeppson
Taxon sampling
The ingroup included 83 sequences representing 54 taxa from
Lycoperdaceae (dataset 1). Seventy-six sequences are generated
for this study, and seven ITS sequences are downloaded from
GenBank (Morganella fuliginea AF485065, M. subincarnata
AJ237626, Bovista polymorpha AJ237613, B. pusilla AJ237631, Calvatia rubroflava AF485064, C. fragilis AJ486962, C. cyathiformis
AJ486868).
Different combinations of outgroups were tested and representatives from Lepiota, Macrolepiota, Cystolepiota, Leucoagaricus, Agaricus, and Leucocoprinus were initially included in the
alignment, as earlier studies indicate that Lycoperdaceae is
nested within lepiotoid fungi (Bates 2004; Kruger et al. 2001;
Lebel et al. 2004; Vellinga 2004). Finally two species of Tulostoma were selected as the outgroup.
In order to decrease the number of ambiguous sites and increase the resolution within Lycoperdon we compiled a separate dataset with the 58 ingroup sequences assumed to
represent species of Lycoperdon in a wide sense and with
Bovista furfuracea as outgroup (dataset 2).
Phylogeny of Lycoperdaceae
Phylogenetic analyses
Sequences were edited and assembled using Sequencher 3.1
(Gene Codes, Ann Arbor). Aligning was done with MAFFT
(Katoh et al. 2002) followed by manual adjustment using the
data editor in PAUP (Swofford 2003). Sequences have been deposited in GenBank and accession numbers are given in Table
1. Sequence alignments are available for download at http://
andromeda.botany.gu.se/lycoperdon.zip.
Heuristic searches for most parsimonious trees were performed using PAUP. All transformations were considered unordered and equally weighted. Variable regions with
ambiguous alignment were excluded and gaps treated as
missing data. Searches used 1K random-addition sequence
replicates and tree bisectionreconnection (TBR) branch
swapping. Relative robustness of clades was assessed by the
BS method using 1K heuristic search replicates with 100 random taxon addition sequence replicates and TBR branch
swapping, saving 100 trees in each replicate.
Bayesian analysis of phylogeny was performed using
MrBayes 3.0B4 (Ronquist & Huelsenbeck 2003). MrModelTest
2.2 (Nylander 2004) was used to estimate separate best-fit
models of evolution for ITS1, 5.8S, ITS2, and LSU. A heterogeneous Bayesian inference was set up with model parameters
estimated separately for each partition. Eight Metropoliscoupled MCMC chains with a temperature of 0.2 were initiated;
these were run for 10 M generations with tree and parameter
sampling every 5K generations (2K trees). The initial burn-in
was set to 50 % (1K trees). A 50 % majority-rule consensus cladogram was computed from the remaining trees; the proportions of this tree correspond to Bayesian PP probabilities (BPP).
Results
The aligned dataset 1 has 1724 characters. After exclusion of
ambiguous areas 1488 characters remained for the analyses.
Of these 1087 are constant, 149 variable and parsimony uninformative, and 252 parsimony informative. MP analysis
yielded 10743 equally most parsimonious trees (length 1054,
E. Larsson, M. Jeppson
64/0.93
79/1.0
58
64
80/1.0
93/1.0
70/
0.92
54/0.98
66/0.96
97/1.0
95/1.0
74/0.93
0.76
84/0.92
70/0.93
100/1.0
97/1.0
85/1.0
90/1.0
80/0.80
99/1.0
93/1.0
100/1.0
75/ 82/1.0
0.99
0.97
100/1.0
62/1.0
93/1.0
83/1.0
0.94
0.99
95/1.0
0.94
100/1.0
77/1.0
62/0.95
76/1.0
100/1.0
100/1.0
55/1.0
100/1.0
96/1.0 94/1.0
59/0.72
Lycoperdon 1
Lycoperdon 2
79/1.0
Lycoperdon
Bovista
93/1.0
59/1.0
Bovista
Globaria
100/1.0
57/0.98
Calvatia
10
Calvatia
Disciseda
Fig 1 The strict consensus tree of 10 743 most parsimonious trees, from the MP analyses of the inclusive dataset of ITS and
LSU sequence data. Support values on branches are given as BS values/Bayesian PPs. The supported clades have been
marked with scale bars and the proposed limits of the genera Lycoperdon, Bovista, Calvatia, and Disciseda with brackets.
Phylogeny of Lycoperdaceae
11
Lycoperdon
Bovista
Calvatia
Disciseda
5 changes
Fig 2 One of the 10 743 most parsimonious trees, from the MP analyses, presented as a phylogram to show the number
of character state changes per branch. Proposed limits of the genera Lycoperdon, Bovista, Calvatia, and Disciseda have been
indicated with brackets.
12
Taxonomy
E. Larsson, M. Jeppson
Phylogeny of Lycoperdaceae
13
65/0.89
81/1.0
74/0.99
62
/0.96
94/1.0
0.59
82/1.0
0.60
88/1.0
54/0.76
0.87
0.77
80/0.98
0.84
97/1.0
98/1.0
0.50
98/1.0
84/0.97
79/0.92
0.73
93/1.0
0.75
100/1.0
87/1.0
0.85
59/0.92
99/1.0
85/1.0
76/1.0
0.54
100/1.0
100/1.0
88/1.0
67/1.0
69/0.99
100/1.0
58/0.97
0.59
71/1.0
0.53
0.61
95/1.0
L. frigidum MJ7716
L. frigidum Eckblad151507
L. niveum Lange900910
L. frigidum MJ4273
L. frigidum Lange191
L. cfr molle MJ4088
L. sp. 1 MJ4285
L. sp. 1 MJ4277
L. molle MJ4557
L. molle MJ4260
L. atropurpureum MJ3269
L. atropurpureum MJ6150
L. mammiforme MJ4841
L. niveum MJ5267
L. niveum MJ4068
L. niveum MJ4109
L. cfr niveum MJ5594
L. cfr frigidum MJ484
L. decipiens MJ4330
L. decipiens MJ7715
L. umbrinum MJ4556
L. umbrinum MJ4556a
L. umbrinum MJ4559
L. turneri MJ5251
L. turneri MJ4265
L. turneri ML08-95
L. altimontanum MJ4270
L. altimontanum holotype
L. excipuliforme MJ6467
L. cretaceum MJ4105
L. cretaceum MJ4302
L. lambinonii MJ5245
L. lambinonii Demoulin4622
L. lividum Dobremez740514
L. lividum MJ4005
L. echinatum MJ6498
L. sp. 2 MJ6371
L. sp. 2 L148-03
L. sp. 2 MJ6394
L. muscorum MJ7717
L. ericaeum MJ5395
L. ericaeum MJ4866
L. sp. 3 MJ4304
L. sp. 3 Vetter407
L. dermoxanthum MJ4856
L. utriforme MJ5388
L. radicatum Parker970911
L. pratense MJ4864
L. cfr intermedium SH15-9
L. cfr intermedium MJ5858
L. marginatum A & P 750822
L. perlatum MJ4684
L. norvegicum MJ5453
L. subincarnatum AJ237626
L. fuligineum AF485065
L. caudatum RGC920818
L. nigrescens MJ5376
L. pyriforme SJ980920
Bovista furfuracea MJ5435
Utraria
Bovistella
Vascellum
Lycoperdon
Morganella
Utraria
Apioperdon
Fig 3 The 50 % majority rule consensus tree from the Bayesian phylogenetic analysis based on the restricted realigned
dataset of the Lycoperdon clade. Support values on branches are given as BS values/Bayesian PPs. Thirty-one species were
identified and are named according to the proposed molecular based classification. The proposed subgeneric division of
Lycoperdon has been indicated with brackets.
14
E. Larsson, M. Jeppson
Lycoperdon sp. 3
Bovista subgenus Bovista
Lycoperdon subgenus Apioperdon (Kreisel & D. Kruger)
Jeppson & E. Larss. comb. nov.
MycoBank no.: 511323
Basionym: Morganella subgenus Apioperdon Kreisel & D.
Kruger, Mycotaxon 86: 174 (2003).
Type species: Lycoperdon pyriforme
Bovista paludosa Lev., Annals Sci. Nat., Bot., ser. 3 5: 163 (1846).
Bovista cretacea T. C. E. Fr., Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 8: 241 (1914).
Bovista nigrescens Pers., Neues Mag. Bot. 1: 86 (1794).
Phylogeny of Lycoperdaceae
Discussion
Phylogenies based on sequence data have gradually changed
the picture of relationships within Agaricales and other homobasidiomycetes (Binder et al. 2005; Hibbett et al. 1997; Hibbett &
Thorn 2001; Larsson & Larsson 2003; Larsson et al. 2004;
Moncalvo et al. 2002). Transforming molecular phylogenies
to classifications will be a challenging task and is likely to reveal taxonomically problematic situations (Hopple & Vilgalys
1999; Moncalvo et al. 2002; Redhead et al. 2001). In a recent
higher classification for fungi it is suggested that the major
clades of the homobasidiomycetes, as they appear in molecular phylogenies, should be translated to orders (Hibbett et al.
2007). In such a classification the euagarics clade (Hibbett &
Thorn 2001; Moncalvo et al. 2002) becomes the Agaricales.
This order includes the majority of gilled mushrooms, but
also a number of aphyllophoralean groups and, for example,
the puffball genera treated in this paper.
As repeatedly shown Lycoperdon is related to Agaricus,
Coprinus, Lepiota, and similar gilled mushrooms (Moncalvo
et al. 2002; Lebel et al. 2004; Vellinga 2004). This assemblage
is usually treated as the family Agaricaceae, at least when
only agaricoid elements are considered. The most comprehensive phylogenetic treatment of the gilled species within
Agaricaceae is presented by Vellinga (2004). She recovered an
ingroup with nine clades, among them the Lycoperdaceae and
Tulostomataceae clades. If the ingroup identified by Vellinga
(2004) is retained as a family, then Lycoperdaceae and Tulostomataceae must be given a lower rank, for example, as tribes.
A comprehensive fine-scale subdivision for Agaricales with
only monophyletic groups is still far away. We suggest that
a final decision on the hierarchical status of the clades identified in this study is postponed and that our ingroup meanwhile is retained as the family Lycoperdaceae.
As already implied by Kruger et al. (2001) and Bates
(2004) Lycoperdaceae is monophyletic only at the exclusion
of Mycenastrum corium, a result repeated in our study. We
analysed a more inclusive LSU dataset with representatives
15
for Agaricus, Leucocoprinus, Lepiota, Podaxis, Montagnea, Cystolepiota, Macrolepiota, Allopsalliota, and Coprinus in order to further
explore the position of Mycenastrum. These analyses (results
not shown) did not alter the position of M. corium in relation
to the ingroup. We concur with Zeller (1949) and Pilat (1958)
that Mycenastrum should be regarded as a monotypic genus
in a separate family Mycenastraceae. Discriminating morphological characters are a thick endoperidium dehiscing by irregular lobes, large spores (up to 13 mm in diam), spore wall
ultrastructure, presence of clamps, and a spinous capillitium
(Hansen 1962; Bronchart & Demoulin 1973).
Within Lycoperdaceae four major clades can be discerned,
viz. Lycoperdon, Bovista, Calvatia, and Disciseda (Figs 1 and
2). The latter three clades correspond more or less to the
current concept of the equally named genera Bovista, Calvatia, and Disciseda. However, a similar translation of the Lycoperdon clade to represent the genus Lycoperdon would imply
that the current circumscription of the genus becomes much
widened. The generic type, Lycoperdon perlatum, clusters with
Morganella, Vascellum, and two more Lycoperdon species in
a well supported clade (Lycoperdon 1, Fig 1), while the majority of Lycoperdon species form an unsupported sister clade
together with some species currently referred to Handkea,
Calvatia, Bovista, and Bovistella (Lycoperdon 2, Fig 1). Recognizing Morganella, Vascellum, and Handkea causes Lycoperdon
in its current sense to be paraphyletic. A monophyletic Lycoperdon would be reduced to the generic type and a small
number of closely related species. The majority of species
would have to be transferred to another genus equivalent
to the Lycoperdon 2 clade. For this group the name Utraria
Quel. (1873) is available but a considerable number of
name changes from Lycoperdon to Utraria becomes necessary.
The alternative solution, and the one we recommend here,
is to accept Lycoperdon in a wide sense. As most species affected by our concept of Lycoperdon were originally described
in this genus the number of name changes can be kept to
a minimum.
Analyses of the dataset restricted to Lycoperdon and with
Bovista furfuracea as outgroup support monophyly for Lycoperdon (BS 69 % and BPP of 0.99) with the exclusion of L. pyriforme
(Fig 3) that in most modern treatments is placed in Morganella.
In morphology L. pyriforme shows lycoperdoid characters, with
a subgleba, although white, a pseudocolumella, and a capilltium of Lycoperdon-type. In absence of decisive molecular results we prefer to keep L. pyriforme in Lycoperdon.
Several well-supported subclades within Lycoperdon
conform more or less to some of the segregate genera
discussed here. Therefore, we propose a subdivision of the
genus and to recognize Vascellum, Morganella, Bovistella, Utraria, and Apioperdon as subgenera within a broadly defined
Lycoperdon (Fig 3).
Lycoperdon nigrescens and L. caudatum occur on various positions in the phylogenetic trees. For convenience they are here
referred to Lycoperdon subg. Utraria, mainly because this subgenus is less well defined than the other subclades.
16
E. Larsson, M. Jeppson
Phylogeny of Lycoperdaceae
17
that L. altimontanum can be reported from Europe. The Norwegian specimen originates from a subalpine grassland habitat
in Southern Central Norway. Another specimen from the
same region (leg. J. Stordal, det. M. Jeppson) is deposited at
the Oslo herbarium (O). L. altimontanum is morphologically related to L. molle, but distinguished by the distinctly intermediate LycoperdonBovista-type of capillitium and its strongly
warted spores. However, sequence analyses strongly support
a connection with L. excipuliforme (Figs 1 and 3).
L. excipuliforme was first moved to Calvatia (Perdeck 1950)
and later transferred to Handkea (Kreisel 1989) because it shares
the slit-like scars in the capillitial walls with L. utriforme, the
type of Handkea. As already mentioned, molecular results suggest Handkea to be polyphyletic and nomenclaturally a synonym of Bovistella. The overall features of L. excipuliforme are
strongly lycoperdoid, and it shares the wide apical rupture of
the peridium at maturity with, e.g. L. cretaceum and L. turneri.
L. lambinonii seems to have a wide distribution on the Eurasian continent, as well as in N. America. There are also records from Iceland (Demoulin 1972b; Hallgrmsson 1993). In
morphology the species is distinguished by fruiting bodies
showing characters intermediate between L. molle and L.
umbrinum. The spores are however smaller (33.54 mm), moderately warted, and the capillitium is usually elastic, rather
thick-walled and with small pits. The sequence variation between the two specimens sequenced is rather high and they
form an unsupported clade.
L muscorum is described from N. America. Demoulin (1979)
considered it a variety of L. ericaeum (var. subareolatum) and
mentioned morphological differences in exoperidial features
and capillitium. Kreisel (1987) restored its specific rank.
Sequence data of L. muscorum confirm it as separate from
L. ericaeum. L. muscorum is rare and grows among mosses on
wet acidic soils in forests or at forest edges. L. ericaeum is preferably found in dry acidic grasslands and is widespread in
Europe and North America (Demoulin 1972a). Lycoperdon sp. 2
is an apparently undescribed species closely related to L. muscorum and L. ericaeum. The specimens included here originate
from mull-rich soil in beech forests in the southernmost parts
of Sweden. The fruiting bodies are characterized by an exoperidium showing features intermediate between L. molle and L.
umbrinum. The spores are moderately ornamented (BC in
the terminology of Demoulin 1972a), and thus reminiscent of
L. lambinonii. However, the spores are constantly larger than
in L. lambinonii and the capillitium is provided with pits.
According to sequence data this is a distinct species, but a formal description should wait until more specimens become
available.
The description of L. cretaceum was based on specimens
from Bellot Island in Canada. It is an arcticalpine species
that in northern Europe occurs in subalpinealpine grasslands
and heathlands on calcareous soil. Although it traditionally
was included in the genus Calvatia due to its wide apical rupture of the peridium at maturity, the micro-morphological
characters are those of Lycoperdon. In our analyses L. cretaceum
takes a place in Lycoperdon 2, well separated from Calvatia
(Fig 1). The study included samples from a Norwegian, as
well as an Icelandic site, and their conspecificity could here
be confirmed. Lange (1990) distinguished several arcticalpine
Calvatia species from Northern Europe, Greenland, and
18
E. Larsson, M. Jeppson
Phylogeny of Lycoperdaceae
19
Bayesian analysis (Fig 1). The main character on which to distinguish a majority of the species of Bovista is the lack of a subgleba, although a reduced to well-developed subgleba is
present in some species. When such a structure is present, it
is always compact and more or less cottony, a feature distinguishing the genus from Lycoperdon where a subgleba is always present and more or less lacunar.
Bovista splits in two strongly supported clades, Bovista and
Globaria that more or less correspond to the subgeneric division by Kreisel (1964, 1967). Subgenus Bovista includes species
with a dichotomously branched capillitium of Bovista-type
and pedicellate spores whereas species in subgenus Globaria
have more lycoperdoid characters, presenting a capillitium
of intermediate LycoperdonBovista type or pure Lycoperdon
type combined with apedicellate spores (Fig 4).
The majority of species in subgenus Globaria were originally described in Lycoperdon and were treated as such by,
e.g. Hollos (1904), Perdeck (1950), Eckblad (1955), and Pilat
(1958). However, B. dermoxantha that traditionally was placed
in subgenus Globaria, clustered in our analyses within Lycoperdon 2 (Fig 1). With the exclusion of B. dermoxantha and
with the inclusion of B. limosa and a new species here named
B. cfr limosa, our results support the subgeneric division of
Kreisel (1967).
B. cretacea was first described from the north of Sweden. It
has since been collected in subarctic regions in Norway,
Iceland, and Russia but seems to be rare. It can easily be confused with the more common species B. paludosa. The distinguishing characters are to be found in the subglobose (versus
pyriform) fruit body, a slightly different exoperidium, its
somewhat tortuous capillitium, and the caespitose growth
(Jeppson 1999).
B. graveolens is also uncommon, but has a wide distribution
on the Eurasian continent. Macroscopically it can easily be
confused with B. nigrescens, but a microscopic analysis reveals
the presence of spores provided with a curved pedicell, a character unique to this species (Fig 4).
B. limosa is described from Greenland but was for several
years confused with the South American species B. echinella
(syn. Bovistella echinella). Kreisel (1967) observed its true identity and placed it as the only species in subgenus Globaria section Geastrostoma because of the protruding, more or less
Geastrum-like apical stoma. However, as observed by Lange
(1987) it shows morphological characters rather suggesting
a close relationship with subgenus Bovista. This is confirmed
in our analyses (Figs 1 and 2).
As noted by Calonge & Demoulin (1975) and Lange (1987),
B. limosa sensu Kreisel is a heterogeneous taxon. Our analyses
indicate that B. limosa should be divided in two taxa (Figs 1 and
2) with slighty overlapping but mainly different distribution
ranges. Specimens coinciding with B. limosa sensu Rostrup display a northern distribution with a preference for more or less
Fig 4 (A) Lycoperdon pratense, detail of exoperidium. (B) L. pratense, fruiting bodies. (C) L. pratense, paracapillitium.
(D) L. pratense, basidiospores. (E) L. utriforme, capillitium. (F) L. utriforme, basidiospores. (G) L. pyriforme, irregularly shaped
cells from exoperidium. (H) Bovista graveolens, basidiospores. (I) Schematic section through mature fruiting body of Lycoperdon; os, ostiole; gl, gleba; ps, pseudocolumella; en, endoperidium; ex, exoperidium; su, subgleba; rh, rhizomorphs. (J)
Lycoperdon radicatum, capillitium. (K) L. radicatum, basidiospores. (L) Bovista tomentosa, capillitium of Bovista type. (M) Lycoperdon decipiens, capillitium of Lycoperdon type.
20
E. Larsson, M. Jeppson
1992). Langermannia is the older genus name for this group, but
through conservation rejected in favour of Calvatia. Some authors prefer to recognize Langermannia on genus level (e.g. Calonge & Martn 1990; Lange 1993; Calonge 1998) whereas others
prefer one genus (e.g. Kreisel 1992).
The study by Bates (2004) sampled six Calvatia species. In
the analyses they separate into two distinct groups, each
well supported and corresponding to Calvatia s. str. and Langermannia. Our analyses basically show the same results, although Langermannia is represented only by one sequence.
From these two studies it seems clear that Calvatia and Langermannia should both be treated as genera. Still we suggest Calvatia is retained in a wide sense with Langermannia as
a subgenus.
The genus Disciseda is characterized by subhypogeous
fruiting bodies with a specialized way of dehiscence at maturity. The rupture of the exoperidium is more or less circumscissile and the fruit body is turned over exposing an
originally basal pore for the dispersal of the powdery spore
mass. The genus has a worldwide distribution, but is restricted to xeric habitats. In our analyses the two North European species D. candida and D. bovista form an unsupported
sister clade to the rest of Lycoperdaceae. D. bovista is rare and
the species seems to decline in Northern Europe. It is characterized by having strongly ornamented spores. D. candida is
more frequent and macroscopically easily confused with D.
bovista, but distinguished by smaller and only faintly ornamented spores.
Acknowledgements
We thank the curators of the herbarium at GB, C, O and AMNH
and Dr. H. Kreisel for kindly providing material, Henrik
Nilsson for help with the Bayesian analyses, and Karl-Henrik
Larsson for advice with nomenclatural issues. Financial support for this study was received from The Swedish Taxonomy
Initiative, ArtDatabanken SLU, to E.L. (Grant dha 7/04) and
Kapten Carl Stenholms fond to M.J., which are gratefully
acknowledged.
references
Bates ST, 2004. Arizona members of the Geastraceae and Lycoperdaceae (Basidiomycota, Fungi). PhD thesis, Arizona State
University.
Bisht D, Sharma JR, Kreisel H, Das K, 2006. A new species and
a new record of Lycoperdaceae from India. Mycotaxon 95: 9196.
Binder M, Hibbett DS, Larsson K-H, Larsson E, Langer E, Langer G,
2005. The phylogenetic distribution of resupinate forms across
the major clades of mushroom-forming fungi (homobasidiomycetes). Systematics and Biodiversity 3: 113157.
Bronchart R, Demoulin V, 1973. Ultratructure de la paroi
sporale des Gasteromyce`tes Mycenastrum corium et Abstoma
reticulatum en rapport avec leur position systematique. Bulletin
de la Societe Royal de Botanique de Belgique 106: 267272.
Calonge FD, Demoulin V, 1975. Les Gasteromyce`tes dEspagne.
Bulletin Trimestriel de la Societe Mycologique de France 94:
247292.
Phylogeny of Lycoperdaceae
Calonge FD, Martn MP, 1990. Notes on the taxonomical delimitation in the genera Calvatia, Gastropila and Langermannia (Gasteromycetes). Boletn de la Sociedad Micologica de Madrid 14: 181190.
Calonge FD, 1992. El genero Bovista Pers.:Pers. (Gasteromycetes) en
la Pennsula Iberica e Islas Baleares. Boletn de la Sociedad
Micologica de Madrid 17: 101113.
Calonge FD, 1998. Flora Mycologica Iberica. Vol. 3. Gasteromycetes I.
Lycoperdales, Nidulariales, Phallales, Sclerodermatales, Tulostomatales. J. Cramer, Stuttgart.
Demoulin V, 1968. Gasteromyce`tes de Belgique: Sclerodermatales,
Tulostomatales, Lycoperdales. Bulletin du Jardin Botanique National
de Belgique 38: 1101.
Demoulin V, 1969. Les Gasteromyce`tes. Les Naturalistes Belges 50:
225270.
Demoulin V, 1972a. Le Genre Lycoperdon en Europe et en Amerique du
Nord. Etude Taxonomique et Phytogeographique. PhD thesis,
Universite de Lie`ge.
Demoulin V, 1972b. Espe`ces nouvelles ou meconnues du genre
Lycoperdon (Gasteromyce`tes). Lejeunia, nova series 62: 128.
Demoulin V, 1976. Species of Lycoperdon with a setose exoperidium. Mycotaxon 3: 275296.
Demoulin V, 1979. The typification of Lycoperdon described by
Peck and Morgan. Beihefte zur Sydowia 8: 139151.
Demoulin V, Lange M, 1990. Calvatia turneri (Ellis et Everh.)
Demoulin et M. Lange, comb. nov., the correct name for
C. tatrensis Hollos. Mycotaxon 38: 221226.
Dring DM, 1973. Gasteromycetes. In: Ainsworth GC, Sparrow FK,
Sussman AS (eds), The Fungidan Advanced Treatise, vol. IVB.
Academic Press, London.
Eckblad F-E, 1955. The Gasteromycetes of Norway. The epigean
genera. Nytt Magasin for Botanikk 4: 1986.
Fischer E, 1933. Unterklasse Eubasidii, Reihe Gastromyceteae. In:
Engler A, Prantl K (eds), Die naturlichen Pflanzenfamilien, Band 7a.
Wilh. Engelmann, Leipzig.
Gardes M, Bruns TD, 1993. ITS primers with enhanced specificity
for basidiomycetesdapplication to the identification of mycorrhizas and rusts. Molecular Ecology 2: 113118.
Hallgrmsson H, 1993. Islenzkt svappatal V: Kolfsveppir. Draft made
for the Extra Nordic Mycological Congress in Iceland 1993. Natturufristofnun Norurlands, Akureyri.
Hansen L, 1962. A Danish find of Mycenastrum corium with notes
on its anatomy. Botanisk Tidskrift 58: 204212.
Hibbett DS, Binder M, Bischoff JF, Blackwell M, Cannon PF,
Eriksson OE, Huhndorf S, James T, Kirk PM, Lucking R,
Lumbsch T, Lutzoni F, Matheny PB, Mclaughlin DJ, Powell MJ,
Redhead S, Schoch CL, Spatafora JW, Stalpers JA, Vilgalys R,
Aime MC, Aptroot A, Bauer R, Begerow D, Benny GL,
Castlebury LA, Crous PW, Cheng Dai Y, Gams W, Geiser DM,
Griffith GW, Gueidan C, Hawksworth DL, Hestmark G, Hosaka K,
Humber RA, Hyde K, Ironside JE, Koljalg U, Kurtzman CP,
Henrik Larsson K, Lichtwardt R, Longcore J, Miadlikowska J,
Miller A, Marc Moncalvo J, Mozley-Standridge S, Oberwinkler F,
Parmasto E, Reeb V, Rogers JD, Roux C, Ryvarden L,
Paulo Sampaio J, Schussler A, Sugiyama J, Thorn RG, Tibell L,
Untereiner WA, Walker C, Wang Z, Weir A, Weiss M, White MM,
Winka K, Jian Yao Y, Zhang N, 2007. A higher-level phylogenetic
classification of the Fungi. Mycological Research 111: 509547.
Hibbett DS, Pine EM, Langer E, Langer G, Donoghue MJ, 1997.
Evolution of gilled mushrooms and puffballs inferred from
ribosomal DNA sequences. Proceedings of the National Academy
of Sciences, USA 94: 1200212006.
Hibbett DS, Thorn RG, 2001. Basidiomycota: Homobasidiomycetes. In:
McLaughlin DJ, McLaughlin EG, Lemke PA (eds), The Mycota.
Systematics and Evolution, vol. 7. Part B. Springer-Verlag, New
York, pp. 121168.
Hollos L, 1904. Die Gasteromyceten Ungarns. Oswald Weigel, Leipzig.
Hopple Jr JS, Vilgalys R, 1999. Phylogenetic relationships in the
mushroom genus Coprinus and dark-spored allies based on
21
sequence data from the nuclear gene coding for the large ribosomal subunit RNA: divergent domains, outgroups, and
monophyly. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 13: 119.
Jeppson M, 1999. Bovista cretacea and Bovista paludosaden jamforelse mellan tva narbeslaktade aggsvampar. Jordstjarnan 20:
3748.
Jeppson M, 2001. Bovista aestivalis (Lycoperdaceae)da survey of its
occurrence in North Europe. Windahlia 24: 4961.
Jeppson M, Demoulin V, 1989. Lycoperdon atropurpureum found in
Sweden. Opera Botanica 100: 131134.
Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K, Miyata T, 2002. MAFFT: a novel
method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on
Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Research 30: 30593066.
Kirk PM, Cannon PF, David JC, Stalpers JA, 2001. Ainsworth & Bisbys Dictionary of Fungi, 9th edn. CABI Publishing, Wallingford.
Kreisel H, 1962. Die Lycoperdaceae der DDR. [Bibliotheca Mycologica
36] J. Cramer, Lehre.
bersicht der Gattung Bovista Dill. ex
Kreisel H, 1964. Vorlaufige U
Pers. Feddes Repertorium 69: 196211.
Kreisel H, 1967. Taxonomisch-Pflanzengeographische Monographie der Gattung Bovista. Beihefte zur Nova Hedwigia 25: 1244.
Kreisel H, 1969a. Grundzuge eines naturlichen Systems der Pilze.
Verlag von J. Cramer, Lehre.
Kreisel H, 1969b. Gasteromyzeten aus Nepal. Khumbu Himal 6:
2536.
Kreisel H, 1976. Gasteromyzeten aus Nepal II. Feddes Repertorium
87: 83107.
Kreisel H, 1987. Pilzflora der Deutschen Demokratischen Republik.
Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena.
Kreisel H, 1989. Studies in the Calvatia complex (Basidiomycetes).
Nova Hedwigia 48: 281296.
Kreisel H, 1992. An emendation and preliminary survey of the
genus Calvatia (Gasteromycetidae). Persoonia 14: 431439.
Kreisel H, 1993. A key to Vascellum (Gasteromycetidae) with some
floristic notes. Blyttia 51: 125129.
Kreisel H, Calonge FD, 1993. Calvatiella Chow, a synonym for
Bovistella Morgan. Mycotaxon 48: 1325.
Kreisel H, Dring DM, 1964. An emendation of the genus Morganella
Zeller (Lycoperdaceae). Feddes Repertorium 76: 109122.
Kruger D, Kreisel H, 2003. Proposing Morganella subg. Apioperdon subg.
nov. for the puffball Lycoperdon pyriforme. Mycotaxon 86: 169177.
Kruger D, Binder M, Fischer M, Kreisel H, 2001. The Lycoperdales. A
molecular approach to the systematics of some gasteroid
mushrooms. Mycologia 93: 947957.
Lange M, 1987. Arctic Gasteromycetes. The Genus Bovista in
Greenland and Svalbard. In: Laursen GA, Ammirati JF,
Redhead SA (eds), Arctic and Alpine Mycology 2. Plenum Press,
New York, pp. 261271.
Lange M, 1990. Arctic Gasteromycetes III. Calvatia in Greenland,
Svalbard and Iceland. Nordic Journal of Botany 9: 525546.
Lange M, 1993. Classifications in the Calvatia group. Blyttia 34:
141144.
Larsson E, Larsson K-H, 2003. Phylogenetic relationships of russuloid basidiomycetes with emphasis on aphyllophoralean
taxa. Mycologia 95: 10371065.
Larsson K-H, Larsson E, Koljalg U, 2004. High phylogenetic
diversity among corticioid homobasidiomycetes. Mycological
Research 108: 9831002.
Lebel T, Thompson DK, Udovicic F, 2004. Description and affinities
of a new sequestrate fungus, Barcheria willisiana gen. et sp. nov.
(Agaricales) from Australia. Mycological Research 108: 206213.
Martn MP, Jeppson M, 2001. An interesting Lycoperdon affin to
L. ericaeum. Revista Catalana de Micologia 23: 4750.
Moncalvo J-M, Vilgalys R, Redhead SA, Johnson JE, James TY,
Aime MC, Hofstetter V, Verduin S, Larsson E, Baroni TJ,
Thorn RG, Jacobsson S, Clemencon H, Miller OK, 2002. One
hundred and seventeen clades of euagarics. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 23: 357400.
22
E. Larsson, M. Jeppson