Professional Documents
Culture Documents
EdTech Certificate
Project Manager
Brouke Reynolds
Clients
Dr. Clif Mims & Dr. Jennifer Townes
Sponsor
Dr. Trey Martindale
Date
August 31, 2016
Revision History
Revision Date
Revised By
Description of Change
Brouke
Brouke
Project Goal
The EdTech Certificate is designed for educators who want to integrate technology with learning
in K-12 classrooms. The focus of these four courses is to develop the technology competencies
needed for the development, utilization, and integration of instructional computing technology in
the classroom.
This proposal aims to further develop the modules and resources in these courses. This will serve
as a valuable resource to the many educators throughout the Mid-South and beyond that are
integrating technology with learning.
The updated courses will be showcased at several state conferences this Spring and at ISTE
2017.
Scope
Overview
Update the module topics in each course according to the new scope and sequence.
Weave Visible Thinking and the thinking routines throughout courses (Related: 1, 2).
Further integration of EdTPA
Badges, HyperDocs, Instructional Video
Newer Instructional Models: flipped learning, maker/DIY, blended learning, etc.
Deliverable
Four, seven week IDT courses that will be facilitated and managed via Google Classroom.
Goal
The goal of the IDT department is to offer a graduate-level certificate program for educators who
want to effectively integrate technology in their PK-12 and higher education classrooms.
Foundation
The IDT program has identified the BYU badge program as a similar model. We will use this
model as an example and will explore different badge managment platforms such as
badgeschool.org and Mozilla Backpack.
The IDT Educational Technology Certificate has been in existence for more than 20 years. It
consists of four graduate-level course: IDT 7061, 7062, 7063, and 7064 and designed for
Pre-K-12 classroom teachers who want to become more effective and proficient at integrating
technology into their classroom lessons. This program has been successful and popular among
mid-South teachers as well as teachers statewide.
Dr. Mims has currently inherited the courses and has tasked our team of revamping the
certificate program. There are several reasons why the program needs to be reevaluated:
Building a cohesive certificate: The courses have been taught by multiple professors who
have updated and changed each course individually. To some extent, this has created
some disconnect among the four courses. Updating and changing the program as a whole
should create a more cohesive instructional program and the courses will become more
navigable and uniform.
Stakeholders
The members of the EdTech team, the IDT faculty, and the students at the University of
Memphis.
Long-Term Evaluation
The team will work closely with the clients to develop a long-term evaluation plan.
Project Specifications
The purpose of the four classes is to assist educators to integrate educational technology into
their curriculum and become proficient using technology with their students. The instructional
units will assist students with:
Lesson planning and technology integration
Computer based instruction
Models and trends in educational technology
Instructional development
Deliverable
Description
Audience
9/12/16
Project
Charter
Project need
Project Description
Critical Success Factors
Assumptions & Risks
Constraints
Budget & Staffing
Milestones
Client, Sponsor
9/26/16
Analysis
Report
Context Analysis
Learner Analysis
Performance Analysis
Goal Analysis
Learning Context
Sponsor
10/3/16
SOW
Goal
Scope
Deliverables
Risk Management
Change Management
Budget & Staffing
Communication Plan
Quality Assurance Plan
Procurement Plan
Client, Sponsor
10/17/16
Formative
Evaluation
SME Review
One-To-One Review
Small Group Evaluation
Attitude Questionnaires
Client, Sponsor
10/17/16
Content
Analysis
Educational Goals
Content Map
Objectives and Assessment
Identify SME
Client, Sponsor
10/17/16
Instructional
Strategy
Explanation of Instructional
Model
Lesson Structure
Client, Sponsor
10/31/16
Treatment
Description of Site
Client, Sponsor
Description
and Rationale
Interface of LMS
Introduction of Badges
11/7/16
Treatment
Design and
Template
Client, Sponsor
11/7/16
Team
Member
Review
Team
11/14/16
Final
Treatment
Report
Site Map
Stylesheet
Final Badge Production
Client, Sponsor
11/23/16
Project
Presentation
Video
Culmination of project as
described by team
Client, Sponsor
12/5/16
Project
Evaluation
Report
Sponsor
1. Integration:
Technology
platform
chosen in not
transferrable
to clients
system
2. Technology
platform of
choice is new
to some team
members
Probability
of
Occurrence
Moderate
Medium
Impact
Description
Impact
Severity
Value
If the
platform used
is not
compatible
with the
clients
platform,
then there
will be issues
with
integration.
Training will
be needed for
some team
members to
become
Response
Strategy
Meeting and
discussions
with client on
platform
choice and
integration
All team
members will
have to
complete
tutorials and
Responsible
Party(ies)
Travis, Lead
e-Learning
Developer
Melissa,
Lead
Evaluator
Anna Carrie,
Lead
Instructional
Designer
Travis, Lead
e-Learning
Developer
familiar with
the
platform(s).
This requires
more time to
be focused on
training and
development.
training on the
platform.
Melissa,
Lead
Evaluator
Anna Carrie,
Lead
Instructional
Designer
Dell McAtee,
Lead Team
Site
Manager
3.
Communicatio
n
4. Scope of
project clearly
defined
High
Medium/
High
Distance and
schedules of
team
members
impact
members
availability for
meetings,
discussions,
updates, etc.
When the
scope of the
project is not
clearly
defined,
frequent
meetings with
Team
members must
communicate
timely and
effectively.
Discuss ways
to resolve
schedule
conflicts.
The project
manager, as
well as other
team members
will provide
updates on
meetings and
discussions
that happen
outside of the
group.
Weekly update
and
progression
meetings must
happen with
the client.
Brouke
Reynolds,
Project
Manager
Travis, Lead
e-Learning
Developer
Melissa,
Lead
Evaluator
Anna Carrie,
Lead
Instructional
Designer
Dell McAtee,
Lead Team
Site
Manager
Brouke
Reynolds,
Project
Manager
Brouke
Reynolds,
Project
Manager
Clients: Dr.
Clif Mims
5. Production
of badges does
not meet
clients
requirements
6. Meeting
deadlines
7. Costs
Moderate
Medium
Moderate
the client is
needed for
clarity and
direction.
Badges must
meet the
clients
requirements
or the badges
will have to
be re-created.
Deadlines
must be met
in order to
complete the
project on
time. Missing
deadlines
affect the
project
completion as
well as teams
relationship
(internal and
external).
Failure to stay
within budget
creates losses
for the team
or requests to
client for
additional
costs
approval.
and Dr.
Jennifer
Townes
4
The e-Learning
developer will
communicate
with the client
to ensure
badges are on
track with the
clients
expectations.
All team
members must
complete their
assigned tasks
by the
deadline set by
the project
manager.
Delays and
issues should
be
communicated
immediately.
Travis, Lead
e-Learning
Developer
Travis, Lead
e-Learning
Developer
Melissa,
Lead
Evaluator
Anna Carrie,
Lead
Instructional
Designer
Dell McAtee,
Lead Team
Site
Manager
Brouke
Reynolds,
Project
Manager
Travis, Lead
e-Learning
Developer
Melissa,
Lead
Evaluator
Anna Carrie,
Lead
Instructional
Designer
Dell McAtee,
Lead Team
Site
Manager
Brouke
Reynolds,
Project
Manager
Level
Probability of Occurrence
High
Medium/High
Medium
Moderate
Low
Certain to occur
Very Likely to occur
Somewhat greater chance to occur
Somewhat likely to occur
Less likely to occur
Schedule
Date
September 9, 2016
Project Milestone
First phone conversation with clients to understand their
Project Charter
Analysis Report
October 3, 2016
SOW
Formative Evaluation
Content Analysis
Instructional Strategy
November 7, 2016
November 7, 2016
Budget***
Role
Cost Breakdown
Total
Project Management
$10,000
80 hours at $50/hr
- 20 hours per course
$4,000
Instructional Design
$9,000
Instructional
Development
$6,000
Graphic Design
40 hours at $50/hr
- 10 hours per course
$2,000
Total
460 hours
$31,000
***All fees are for estimation purposes only, all work is being donated as part of the IDT 7095 experience
and expectations
Staffing Plan
Staff Resource
Dates Needed
Hours Required
Internal
1-Project Manager
140 Hours
140 Hours
140 Hours
1-Lead Evaluator
140 Hours
140 Hours
External
2-Clients
30 Hours
1-Sponsor
15 Hours
Procurement Plan
For this project, none of the resources will actually be purchased. The team is limited to free
resources. The resources needed for this project will either be provided by the client or already
accessible to the team.
Resource
Google
Classroom
Process
Access to Google Classroom will be
provided by the client. An account is
Free Resource
Method to
check for
quality
Quality
materials to
be used
SOW
Team member
review
10-2-16
Client and
EdTech team
N/A
Formative
Evaluation
Expert review,
user feedback
10-16-16
Client and
EdTech team
N/A
Content
Analysis
Team member
review
10-16-16
Client and
EdTech team
Example
Documents,
ISTE
standards
Instructional
Strategy
Team member
review
10-23-16
Client and
EdTech team
Objectives are
based on
ABCD
components
Treatment
Report
Team member
review
10-30-16
Client and
EdTech team
Checklists,
Templates,
Example
Documents
Project
Evaluation
Report
Team member
review
11-7-16
Client and
EdTech team
Checklists,
Example
Documents