Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Nov/Dec 2009
Part A
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Nov/Dec 2009
Nov/Dec 2009
Part B
11.
(a)
The following table gives the list of techniques that are available for use in clays and sands and
needs to be explained as per requirement.
Sampling Technique
Chunk Sampling
Applicability
Highest quality undisturbed samples in
cohesive and cohesionless soils
Thin walled tube samplers
Undisturbed samples in cohesive and
cohesionless soils without gravel particles
Piston samplers (fixed piston and hydraulic Undisturbed samples in cohesive and
piston)
cohesionless soils
Pitcher sampler
Undisturbed samples in cohesive soils and
sands with cementation
Open Drive samplers under compressed air
Sand sampling
Impregnation technique
Sand sampling
Freezing technique
Sand sampling
Core catchers
Sand sampling
11.
(b)
Electrical Resistivity Method Principle
o Based on the fact that different materials offer different resistances to the
passage of electricity
o Resistivity depends upon
Water content
Voids ratio
Particle size
Temperature
Stratification
Equipments
o 4 electrodes
o Potentiometer
o Multimeter
o Battery
Method
o Electricity is passed into the ground through the end electrodes
o The potential difference is measured between the inner electrodes
o The spacing is changed and the procedure is repeated
Jijo James, Asst. Professor, Civil Engineering www.jiotec.blogspot.in
Nov/Dec 2009
o
Advantages
o Can detect sea water intrusion, organic deposits, aquifers, ore bodies
o Can differentiate pervious alluvium from clay
Limitations
o Wide range and overlapping of resistances make interpretation difficult
o Readings are easily affected by surface anomalies
12.
(a)
Terzaghis bearing capacity theory (1943) is an improvement upon earlier analyses done
by Prantl(1921) and Reissner (1924) considering the case of rough foundation bases
resting on soil mass possessing weight
He developed a general bearing capacity equation for a uniformly loaded strip footing
The chief features and assumptions of his theory were
L/B raio is large and hence plane strain condition is assumed
The base of the footing is laid at a shallow depth
The shearing resistance of soil between the surface and depth of footing D f is
neglected
The footing is considered as a surface footing with uniorm surcharge equal to
Df at the level of the base of the footing
General shear failure takes place and the soil volume is unchanged prior to
failure
The shear strength of the soil is governed by Mohr-coulomb equation
Nov/Dec 2009
The base of the footing being rough, when the footing sinks into the soil, a
certain portion of the soil immediately below the footing is prevented from
undergoing any lateral movement by friction and adhesion between the base of
the footing and the soil. This wedge of soil, called Zone I is in a state of elastic
equilibrium
Zone II (Zone of radial shear)
At failure the vertical downward movement of the soil wedge pushes the soil on
either side of the wedge and transforms it into a state of plastic equilibrium
One set of radial shear planes radiate from the edge of the footing in this zone
The curved lower boundary of this zone has the shape of logarithmic spiral
Zone III (Rankines zone of passive linear shear)
This zone has two sets of shear planes inclined at an angle of (45 /2) to the
horizontal
The bottom sides of the elastic wedge rise at angle of and the curved failure
planes are assumed to be vertical at d
The failure planes do not extend beyond the base of the footing and it is basically
because of this assumption the theory is valid only for shallow foundations
At failure the downward forces due to self weight of wedge and load transmitted by
footing should be equal to the upward passive resistances of the soil
Nov/Dec 2009
The resulting passive resistance is taken as the sum of the three components Pp, Ppc and
Ppq
In the Terzaghis BC equation, Nc, Nq and N are dimensionless factors called Terzaghis
bearing capacity factors depending only upon the angle of shearing resistance
For saturated clay at the end of construction u may be taken as zero for which Nc= 5.7;
Nq=1; N = 0
The equation reduces to qu = 5.7cu + q
For local shear failure Terzaghi gave a modification to his equation as the failure surface
is not fully developed
cm = (2/3)c and tan m = (2/3) tan m and Nc Nqand N are the BC factors for local
shear failure
When u >= 36o, GSF is said to occur and when u <=28o, LSF is said to occur and for
values in between failure has both characteristics
Terzaghis derived his equation considering a strip footing and hence he gave
modifications for square, circular and rectangular footing as follows
Equipment
Test Plate
Loading Frame
Dial Gauges
Datum bar
Hydraulic Jack
Test Plate
Size range 30 to 75 cm, square
Smaller size for stiff or dense soil and larger size for soft or loose soil
Thickness not less than 25 mm
Edges and sides machined; bottom grooved for roughness
Side of test plate Bp
Nov/Dec 2009
12.
(b)
Test Pit
Size 5 times Bp, square
Small hole in centre to fit the size of the test plate
Thin layer of sand of thickness 5mm used as beding
Depth of hole (Dp) should be such that Dp/Bp = D/B
Nov/Dec 2009
Nov/Dec 2009
Test Procedure
Plate is firmly seated in the hole
Seating load of 70 g/cm2 is applied
Load is applied through a hydraulic jack in steps of one fifth of the expected safe
bearing capacity or one tenth of expected ultimate bearing capacity
Settlement is observed by two diametrically opposite dial gauges
Sensitivity of dial gauges - 0.02mm
Settlement is observed for every 1, 2.25, 4, 6.25, 9, 16, 25, 36, 49, 60 minutes
and thereafter every one hour till the rate of settlement reduces to less than
0.025mm/min
After this the next load increment is applied
The maximum load applied corresponds to 1.5 times of ultimate load or 3 times
the proposed safe bearing pressure
If water table is above the depth of foundation, it should be lowered by
pumping out
Graph is plotted between load and settlement
The breaking point in load settlement curve is used to find the ultimate load
If it does not show any marked break, then failure may be assumed as load
corresponding to settlement 1/5th of the width of the foundation
Nov/Dec 2009
Nov/Dec 2009
13.
(b)
Trapezoidal Combined Footing
Nov/Dec 2009
14.
(a)
Given data:
P = 30 kN ; e = 0.5 ; s = 1.4cm ; W = 40 kN ; h = 0.8 ; C = 1.8 cm ; FoS = 2
P x e = 30 x 0.85
= 7.5 kN
Hence W > Pe
= (W + Pe2)/(W + P)
= (40 + 30 x 0.252) / (40 + 30)
= 0.598
Qu
= (W x h x )/ (S + C/2)
= (40 x [0.8 x 100] x 0.598)/ (1.4 + 1.8/2)\
= 832 kN
Qs
= Qu/FoS
= 832 / 2
= 416 kN
14.
(b)
Nov/Dec 2009
15.
(a)
Coulombs Wedge Theory considers the equilibrium of the whole wedge of soil that
tends to slip on failure.
In case of active state, the wedge moves downwards and outwards, whereas in case of
passive state the wedge moves upwards and inwards.
The following are the assumptions in Coulombs wedge theory:
The backfill is dry, cohesionless, isotropic and elastically undeformable but
breakable
The slip surface is plane that passes through the heel of the wall.
The sliding wedge itself acts as a rigid body and earth pressure is obtained by
considering the limiting equilibrium of the whole wedge.
The position and direction of the resultant earth pressure are known.
The back of the wall is rough & relative movement of the wall and the soil on
the back takes place which develops frictional forces that influence the direction
of the resultant pressure.
The forces acting on the wedge are
The weight of the wedge, W
The reaction R, on the plane of sliding
Active thrust, Pa, against the wall
For condition of the yield of the wall from the backfill, the critical slip surface is that for
which the wall pressure is maximum.
Nov/Dec 2009
Using the above said condition it can be shown that ABC = BCE
Thus, the criterion for maximum active pressure, the slip plane is so chosen that area of
ABC = area of BCE
Rankines theory was originally proposed for cohesionless soils only, but later extended
to include cohesive soils by Resal (1910) and by Bell (1915)
The following are the assumptions in Rankines theory
Soil mass is semi-infinite, homogeneous, dry and cohesionless
Ground surface is plane which may be horizontal or inclined
Rankines theory was originally proposed for cohesionless soils only, but later extended
to include cohesive soils by Resal (1910) and by Bell (1915)
The following are the assumptions in Rankines theory
Soil mass is semi-infinite, homogeneous, dry and cohesionless
Ground surface is plane which may be horizontal or inclined
The back of the wall is vertical and smooth
The wall yields about the base and thus satisfies the condition of plastic
equilibrium
Rankines active earth pressure for cohesionless soils for different fill conditions are as
follows:
15.
(b)
Nov/Dec 2009