Professional Documents
Culture Documents
org/in
p-ISSN: 2394-8906
Dr. G. VEERAMANI
Head of the Dept., of Management Studies, Sri Sankara Arts & Science College, Kancheepuram.
ARTICLE INFO
ABSTRACT
Article History:
Key words:
Work life Integration,
Work life balance,
Good life,
Family
JEC Classification:
Copyright 2016 IJASRD. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Common Attibution
License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original
work is properly cited.
INTRODUCTION
Work- Life Integration is an outcome of people exercising control and choice in
their life to meet lifes challenges. This can be in terms of managing work
responsibilities alongside their personal and family needs. The areas of a persons life
which require integration will change based on the individuals life stages it is very
dynamic.
This approach motivates people by satisfying not only their economic needs but
also theirsocial and psychological ones.To satisfy the new generation workforce,
organizationsneed to concentrate on job designs and organization of work. The factors
that influenceand decide the Quality of work life are Attitude, Environment,
How to cite this article: Deepa, S., & Veeramani, G. (2016). Work- Life Integration & Quality of Work Life for
Emerging Innovative Strategies in Business (A Study With Reference To the Staff at Reliance Capital, Chennai).
International Journal of Advanced Scientific Research & Development (IJASRD), 03 (03/I), [Special Issue Sep 2016], pp.
67 73.
Demographics
Factors
No. of
Respondants
Percentage of
Respondants
1.
Age
40 & Above years
06
06.67%
30-39 years
29
32.22%
20-29years
55
61.66%
68
Work- Life Integration & Quality of Work Life for Emerging Innovative Strategies in Business (A
Study With Reference To the Staff at Reliance Capital, Chennai)
Total
90
100.00
Male
39
43.33%
Female
51
56.67%
90
100.00
19
21.11%
1-2 years
34
37.78%
2-5years
19
21.11%
18
20.00%
90
100.00
2.
Gender
Total
3.
Work Experience
Total
Inferences:
a. 06.67% of the respondents belong to above 40 years of age group, 32.32% belong
to 30-39 years and 61.66% belong to 20-29 years age group.
b. 43.33% of the respondents were male and 56.66% were female.
c. 21.11% of the respondents belong to less than one year of work experience.
37.78% of the respondents belong to 1-2 years of work experience. 21.11% of the
respondents belong to 2-5 years of work experience. 20.00% of the respondents
belong to 5 years and above work experience.
3.2 Factor Analysis of the Attributes Influencing Quality of Work Life
Sl.
No.
1.
2.
Study Factors
Motivating
of
the
Working environment
Cooperate
other
with
each
Agreeable Level of
Opinion
No of
Respondants
Percentage
a. Extremely Motivating
b. Fairly Motivating
c. Neither Motivating
Nor Demotivating
56
32
02
62.22%
35.56%
02.22%
Total
90
100.00
87
03
96.67%
03.33%
90
100.00
88
02
97.78%
02.22%
90
100.00
52
30
08
57.78%
33.33%
08.89%
90
100.00
33
25
14
18
36.67%
27.78%
15.55%
20.00%
90
100.00
a. Yes
b. No
Total
3.
a. Yes
b. No
Total
4.
Training Programs
a. To great extent
b. To some extent
c. Rarely
Total
5.
Infrastructure
a. Seating Arrangement
b. Quality of First aid
c. Quality of Lunch
d. Travelling Facility
total
69
Inferences:
a. 62.22% of the respondents are extremely motivating by the work environment.
35.56% of the respondents are fairly motivating by work environment. 0.22% of
the respondents are neither motivating nor demotivating by the work
environment.
b. 96.67% of the respondents are satisfied with the cooperation of other department
in the organization. 03.33% of the respondents are not satisfied with the
cooperation of the other department in the organization
c. 97.78% of the respondents told that they are free to offer comments and
suggestions in the organization. 02.22% 0f the respondents feels that they are not
in free to offer comments and suggestions in the organization
d. 57.78% of the respondents told that the training programs conducts to great
extent. 33.33% of the respondents told the training will be given in some extent.
08.89% of the respondents told rarely only the organization will conduct the
training program.
e. 36.67% of the employees feels that Seating arrangement are good in the
organization. 27.78% of the respondents feels that Quality of the first aid is
excellent in the organisation. 15.55% of the employees feels that quality of food is
average in the organization. 18% of the employees feels that Travelling facilities
was poor.
3.3 Benefits for Employeesin an Organisation
S.
No.
1.
Study Factors
Fair Compensation
Agreeable Level of
Opinion
a. Strongly agree
b. Agree
c. Disagree
d. Strongly disagree
Total
2.
Salary by considering
responsibilities at work
a. Strongly agree
b. Agree
c. Disagree
d. Strongly disagree
Total
3.
Work allows me to do
in a particular area
a. Strongly agree
b. Agree
c. Disagree
d. Strongly disagree
Total
4.
Fringe Benefits
a. Insurance
b. Retirement benefits
c. Health Checkup
d. All the above
No.of
Respondants
Percentage
37
48
04
01
41.11%
53.33%
04.45%
01.11%
90
100
56
32
02
00
62.22%
35.56%
02.22%
00.00%
90
100.00
44
40
05
01
48.89%
44.44%
05.56%
01.11%
90
100
25
13
50
02
27.78%
14.44%
55.56%
02.22%
70
Work- Life Integration & Quality of Work Life for Emerging Innovative Strategies in Business (A
Study With Reference To the Staff at Reliance Capital, Chennai)
Total
5.
Social security
a. Yes
b. No
Total
6.
Comfortable
&
satisfied with your job
a. Satisfied
b. Neutral
c. Dis satisfied
Total
7.
a. Yes
b. No
Total
8.
a. Salary increases
b. Promotions
c. Leave
d. Motivational talk
e. Recognition
Total
9.
Working Environment
a. Participative
b. Autonomy
c. Whimsical
d. Red Tapism
Total
90
100.00
88
02
97.78%
02.22%
90
100.00
60
26
04
66.67%
28.88%
04.45%
90
100.00
84
06
93.33%
06.67%
90
100.00
26
10
50
04
00
28.88%
11.11%
55.56%
04.45%
00.00
90
100.00
60
30
00
00
66.67%
33.33%
00
00
90
100.00
Inferences:
a. 41.11%of the respondents are strongly agreed with the compensation provided in
the organization. 53.33% of the respondents are agree with the compensation
provided in the organization. 04.45% of the respondents are disagree with the
fair compensation. 01.11% of the respondents are strongly dis agreed with the
fair compensation.
b. 62.22% of the respondents are strongly aree. 35.56% of the respondents are
agree. 0.22% of the respondents are dis agree with this.
c. 48.89% of the respondents are strongly agree, 44.44% of the respondents are
agree, 5.56% of the respondents are disagree, 01.11% of the respondents are feels
that their organization allows them to do the works in what area they are
interested.
d. 27.78% of the respondents are selected that the organization provide benefits like
insurance, 14.44% of the respondents selected Retirement benefits, 55.56% of the
respondents selected Health checkup and 02.22% of the respondents selected all
the above.
e. 97.78% of the respondents are told that the company will provide social security
benefits to the employees. 02.22% of the respondents selected that the
organization will not provide social security benefits to the employees in an
organization.
71
f.
66.67% of the respondents are satisfied and comfortable with their job. 28.88% of
the respondents are neutraly satisfied and neutraly comfortable with their job in
an organization. 04.45% of the respondents are not comfortable on their job.
g. 93.33% of the respondents are feel secured about their job. 06.67% of the
respondents are not feeling secured on their job.
h. 28.88% of the respondents feel that increase in salary motivating them to do the
work. 11.11% of the respondents feelthat promotions motivating them to do the
work. 55.56% of the respondents feel that leave and 04.45% of the respondents
feels that motivational talk feels them to do work more efficiently.
i.
72
Work- Life Integration & Quality of Work Life for Emerging Innovative Strategies in Business (A
Study With Reference To the Staff at Reliance Capital, Chennai)
Retrieved
from
[4] Glasier (1976). State of the Art, Questions about Quality of Work Life, Personnel,
cited in Gupta, M. & Sharma, P. (2011). Factor Credentials Boosting Quality of
Work Life of BSNL Employees in Jammu Region, APJRBM, 2 (1), pp. 79 89.
[5] http://www.journalcra.com/sites/default/files/Download%20579.pdf
[6] http://www.ipublishing.co.in/ajmrvol1no1/voltwo/EIJMRS2041.pdf
[7] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quality_of_working_life
[8] http://www.studymode.com/essays/Quality-Of-Work-Life-1724016.html
73