Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DOI 10.1007/s12524-012-0251-2
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Introduction
The shoreline is highly dynamic and changes temporally and spatially in response to variations in coastal
processes (Carter 1988; Bird 1993; Forbes et al. 2004).
Over time frames of less than a year, the major factor
influencing shoreline change is seasonal wave climate
(Masselink and Pattiaratchi 2001). Considering decadal time frames, the important factors influencing
shoreline change includes the impacts of large storms
and tsunamis (Cooper et al. 2004; Scheffers et al.
2005). The factors that influence long-term shoreline
changes are sea level rise, coastal storm climatology
and variations in sediment supply (Thom and Hall
1991; Pethick 2001; Kumar et al. 2010).
Besides the reason for coastal erosion, littoral retreat is always reflected by overwash and/or beach and
dune erosion (Bird 1993). When natural processes
Study Area
The study area is a 65 km long coastline on the east
coast of India, covering parts of Midnapur and
Balasore littoral tracts along Kanthi coastal plain and
Subarnarekha delta plain, occurring in West Bengal
and Orissa states respectively, which is potentially
vulnerable to erosion hazard. The study area is
bounded in the NE by Rasulpur River (Midnapur)
and in the SW by Subarnarekha River (Balasore),
and lies between 21 3021 48 N latitudes and
87 2487 54 E longitudes (Fig. 1).
The beach material is generally siliciclastic and
quartzo-feldspathic in composition, with well sorted,
medium to fine sand (Friedman and Sanders 1978;
Bhattacharya et al. 2003). The foreshore beach is
generally flat with low gradient (1:50 to 1:70) and
slightly concave upward to gently undulating and consist of medium to fine grained sand. The bathymetric
chart reveals that the general offshore gradient is 1:003
and at Digha Mohona the gradient is gentler (1:001).
A steeper shore face off Digha, as compared to the
area to its SW up to the mouth of the Subarnarekha
and to its NW, where the bathymetric contours take a
sharp turn towards the sea, and is known as Western
Brace.
Geomorphological map of the area shows that this
coastal region was made up of alternate lines of beach
ridges or chennier plains (Niyogi 1970; Chakrabarty
2005), situated on silty or clayey marine terraces.
Almost shore-parallel formations of six ancient shoreline positions have been found over the 30 km wide
coastal region (Niyogi 1970), which indicates landward
shifting of shoreline positions in the past. The geomorphic divisions like beach, active dunes, mud flats, chenier plains etc. of the study area have been developed
within last 6,000 years (Paul 2002; Dey et al. 2005).
The studied zone experiences strong longshore current from SW to NE direction during the monsoon
Rasulpur
River
Petua Ghat
Gopalpur
Junput
MIDNAPUR (WEST BENGAL)
Haripur
COAST
BALASORE (ORISSA)
Dadanpatra
Mandarmani
Tajpur
Shankarpur
Digha
Udaipur
Digha Inlet
Talsari
Talsari Inlet
Pichhabani Inlet
COAST
Jaldah Inlet
Subarnarekha
River
Kirtania
Chandrabali
Methods of Study
The coastal erosion vulnerability map was based on
result interpretation and integration of the mediumterm shoreline changes in conjunction with the distribution of landuse and human activities, and coastal
population density. In this study, landuse and human
activities, and population density were mapped within
the littoral zone, extending 1 km landward from the
shoreline.
Shoreline Change Rate
The shoreline change rate is one of the most common
measurements used by coastal scientists, engineers,
and land planners to indicate the dynamics and the
hazards of the coast (Savage and Foster 1989).
Analysis of the coastal evolution in the study area
has been carried out over the 38 year period (1972 to
2010), which is considered as medium term (Crowell
et al. 1993; Anfuso and Martinez Del Pozo 2009),
using five multi-temporal Landsat satellite data.
Ortho-rectified Landsat MSS, TM and ETM+ images
covering the study area in the years 1972, 1980, 1990,
2000, and 2010 were downloaded from USGS Global
Visualization Viewer (2011). The data have been projected to the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM)
projection system with WGS-84 datum and zone 45.
Spatial error among the multi-dated satellite images
due to tidal variation, weather conditions and pixel
variations during data acquisition have been generalized in the present study. Allan et al. (2003) suggest
Time
Date of
acquisition
SL a Shift
from HT b
Tide condition
(GMT +5:30)
Tidal
Condition (ft)
height (ft)
(m)
Digha
Shankarpur Dadanpatra Junput
(1:47) c (1:55) c
(1:43)c
(1:72)c
Landsat
4:28:29
5, TM
Landsat
4:27:56
7, ETM+
TM
3:38:00
12.99
Slack
37.95
29.67
49.68
11.89
Slack
85.25
66.65
111.6
NA
NA
TM
3:38:00
Slack
MSS
3:52:22
15.69
Slack
16.5
12.9
21.6
Landsat
1, MSS
4:08:00
11.60
Rising
25.85
20.21
33.84
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
56.65
44.29
74.16
Not Available
classification module to form complete separation between land and water classes, and to remove effect of
suspended materials, if any. Horizontal and vertical
Sobel filters (ERDAS 2005) were used in each unsupervised classified image of each data set to enhance
edge detection. The selected pixels, representing
shoreline have been converted into vector layers using
Rasulpur
River
Tr. 1
Pichhabani
Inlet
Digha
Inlet
Subarnarekha
River
Tr. 594
Talsari
Inlet
Kirtania
Jaldah
Inlet
Junput
Low (1)
Moderate (2)
High (3)
010 (accretion)
< 10 (severe
erosion)
Negative () and positive (+) values, respectively, indicate erosion and accretion
Population
There are many potential indicators of socio-economic
variables. Population can be selected as one of the subindex of socio-economic variables (Hegde and Reju
2007). Coastal population can be considered as an
economic variable (Dilley and Rasid 1990; Devoy
1992; Rivas and Cendrero 1994; Gornitz et al. 1997;
McLaughlin et al. 2002) because people in densely
populated areas act to protect their properties from
erosion. They are reluctant to abandon their properties
and infrastructures that have been built up over many
years. On the other hand, the areas where few people
live may not suffer the same pressure or the same urge
for protection. At the same time, the coastal population can also be interpreted as a direct erosion-inducing variable (McLaughlin et al. 2002; Hegde and
Reju 2007), because the presence of large number of
people near the coast may produce damaging impacts
on the coastal areas. Both views of population in
relation to coastal vulnerability are complementary,
as each magnifies the effect of the other in increasing
or decreasing vulnerability. Population density maps
of the coastal villages were prepared using historical
maps and census data. The coastal areas having
high population density are considered as high
vulnerable and low population density areas are
considered as low vulnerable. The population
density for the entire study area was grouped into
p
a b c =n
Moderate
High
Very high
Parameter
(km)
(%)
(km)
(%)
(km)
(%)
(km)
(%)
4.62
20
30.77
37
56.92
7.69
23
35.38
24
36.92
12
18.46
9.23
35
53.85
22
33.85
1.54
10.77
CVI
23.5
36.15
36
55.38
2.5
3.85
4.62
having coastal population density of 1,0001,500 persons/km2, about 7 km (10.77 % of the total) of coastline
that has recorded coastal population density of more
than 1,500 persons/km2 along the remaining part of
Digha, and the coastal stretch of Gobindabasan and
Biramput has very high risk rating (Fig. 7)
Coastal Vulnerability Index (CVI)
In the present study, the studied littoral, on a vulnerability scale, has been classified as low, moderate, high and
very high based on three variables, namely, shoreline
change rate, landuse and human activities, and coastal
population (Table 3). The resultant CVI has been calculated and the vulnerability zones along the shoreline,
extending from the shoreline to a landward distance of
1 km, are presented on the CVI map (Fig. 8).
Fig. 8 Coastal vulnerability
classes along studied littoral
Conclusions
The result of this study shows that the study area is
highly erosion prone zone. Major portion of this part
of eastern coast of India, bordering Bay of Bengal has
been subjected to considerable erosion, only in small
parts there has been accretion. It is observed that regions
having man-made structures and interventions are the
most erosion affected areas. The coastal vulnerability
map produced using the methodology followed in this
study serve as a broad indicator of threats to people
living in this coastal zone. This is the first such study
undertaken in the current study area, which is lying
along a highly erosion prone and thickly populated
zone on east coast of India. The coastal erosion
vulnerability map prepared from this study can be
used for proper planning and management of this
coastal zone. The study also conclusively proves the
usefulness of remote sensing data, in situ observations, and GIS analysis tools in coastal vulnerability
studies.
Acknowledgments The authors thank USGS Global Visualization Viewer (GLOVIS) for providing free satellite data. The
authors thank Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO), India for providing financial assistance during this study under
RESPOND Program. Authors also thank Dr. Sabyasachi Maiti
and Mr. M. Das Adhikari, IIT Kharagpur for their help at
various stages of the research work.
References
Allan, J. C., Komar, P. D., & Priest, G. R. (2003). Shoreline
variability on the high-energy Oregon Coast and its usefulness in erosion-hazard assessments. Journal of Coastal
Research, 38(SI), 83105.
Anfuso, G., & Martinez Del Pozo, J. A. (2009). Assessment of
coastal vulnerability through the use of GIS tools in South
Sicily (Italy). Environmental Management, 43, 533545.
Bhattacharya, A., Sarkar, S. K., & Bhattacharya, A. (2003). An
assessment of coastal modification in the low lying tropical
coast of north east India and role of natural and artificial
forcings, International Conference on Estuaries and
Coasts, 2003 November 911 (pp. 158165). China:
Hangzhou.
Bird, E. C. (1993). Submerging coasts. New York: Wiley.
Boruff, B. J., Emrich, C., & Cutter, S. L. (2005). Erosion hazard
vulnerability of US coastal countries. Journal of Coastal
Research, 21(5), 932942.
Carter, R.W.G. (1988). Coastal environments, Academic Press.
Chakrabarty, A. (2005). Sedimentary structures of tidal flats: a
journey from coast to inner estuarine region of eastern
India. Journal of Earth System Science, 114(3), 353368.
Cooper, J. A., Jackson, D., Nava, F., McKenna, J., & Malvarez,
G. (2004). Storm impacts on an embayed high energy
coastline, western Ireland. Marine Geology, 210, 261280.
Cooper, J. A., & McLaughlin, S. (1998). Contemporary multidisciplinary approaches to coastal classification and environmental risk analysis. Journal of Coastal Research, 14
(2), 512524.
Crowell, M., Leatherman, S. P., & Buckley, M. (1993). Shoreline change rate analysis: long term versus short term data.
Shore and Beach, 61(2), 1320.
Crowell, M., Leikin, H., & Buckley, M. K. (1999). Evaluation
of erosion hazards study: an overview. Journal of Coastal
Research, 1(SI), 29.
Devoy, R. J. N. (1992). Questions of coastal protection and the
human response to sea-level rise in Ireland and Britain.
Irish Geography, 25(1), 122.
Dewidar, K. H., & Frihy, O. (2008). Pre- and post-beach response to engineering hard structures using Landsat timeseries at the northwestern part of the Nile delta, Egypt.
Journal of Coastal Conservation, 11, 133142.
Dey, S., Ghosh, P., & Nayak, A. (2005). The influences of
natural environment upon the evolution of sand dunes in
tropical environment along Medinipur coastal area, India.
The Indonesian Journal of Geography, 37(1), 5168.
Dilley, R. S., & Rasid, H. (1990). Human response to coastal
erosion: Thunder Bay, Lake Superior. Journal of Coastal
Research, 6(4), 779788.
All in-text references underlined in blue are linked to publications on ResearchGate, letting you access and read them immediately.