Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Yes. If the predisposition due to the climate a just and natural disposition did
not exist, the race would disappear, a victim of excessive work in a tropical
country. We must study thoroughly indolence and its cause. Doing so will avoid
blaming our country for the problem of indolence, and will find what its true cause
is. Then finally we can propose solution for it.
9. Why was indolence among the Filipinos not a hereditary one?
It is because filipinos have not always been what they are now, and there
witnesses to prove it. The witnesses were historians from the first years of
discovery of the Philippines. Filipinos, inspite of climate, necessities, were not
indolent people of our time, some proofs were their good morals, industrious
characteristics, own culture, devotion to customs, mode of living, etc.
10.
Why should we be interested in knowing the forces which contributed to
indolence?
To understand how the Filipinos who were so devoted to their customes as to
border on habit, abandon their former industry, thei trade, their sea-farming, etc.
to the point of forgetting completely their past.
11.
How did wars contribute to indolence among the filipinos?
Wars induced decline of work, an evil which instead of being remedied by
prudence, mature reflection, and recognition of errors commetted by a deplorable
policy through regrettable blindness and obstinacy, has gone from bad to worse
intil reaching the condition in which we see it now.
12.
How did the piratical attacks contribute to indolence among the Filipinos?
It has resulted to neglect to industry, agriculture, and commerce, depopulation,
etc.
13.
How did the attitude of the Friars contribute to indolence among the
Filipinos?
Their attitude had made Filipinos stopped living as they trully were, and working.
Filipinos were made to stop work in the mines, abandon their industries, destroy
their loom. They were made to believe that in life, there is only to have your hopes
in heaven, and preparation for death.
14.
How does a man lose interest in work?
Man works for a purpose; remove the purpose and you reduce him to in action.
15.
Exaplain why a person who is not free is not responsible for his action.
He who does not act freaaly is not responsible for his actions; and the Filipino
people, not being free, are not responsible either for their misfortunes or their
woes.
16.
How did lessening encouragement to labor foster indolence among the
Filipinos?
It is because it took away Filipinos motivation for working. It is also because they
were also worried, some in fear that they might get in trouble in doing so.
17.
What is your opinion on the rules governing the permission to use firearms?
I believe that every human being has the right to security and defense for the sake
of his own life. That is why I personally approve in the permission of firearms
usage, but only if with proper and righteous conditions that is fair to all.
18.
How did the miserly return to ones labor foster indolence?
The miserly return that the Filipinos gets from his labor would in the end
discourage him. Through the historians we learn that the encomenderos, after
reducing many to slavery and compelling them to work for their benefit, made the
rest sell them their products at an insignificant price or for nothing or cheated
them with false measures.
19.
How was conflict of interests harmful to the administartion of the
government
The governor, in charge administering the country and collecting the various taxes
in the name of the Government, devotes himself almost entirely to business; for
him the high and noble functions of his office are nothing more than instruments
for personal gain. He monopolizes all business, and instead of stimulating around
him love of work, instead of curbing the very natural indolence of the native,
abusing his authority, he thinks of nothing else but of destroying all competition
which might bother him or attempt to share in his profits.
20.
Are the difficulties mentioned by Rizal similar to difficulties encountered
today? Why?
Yes for some. It is because it is still true that there is still great difficulty that every
enterprise encountered with the administration also contirbuted not a little to kill
off every commercial or industrial movement.
21.
Explain how trading with China was harmful to the people.
Trading with China which was the whole occupation of the colonizers of the
Philippines was not only prejudicial to Spain but also to the life of her colonies.
22.
How was dislike for manual labor influenced by the rulers?
The pernicious influence of the rulers, that of surrounding themselves with
servants and despising physiscal or manual labor as unworthy of the nobility; those
lordly manners that filipinos translated into Tila ka kastila; and desire of the ruled
to be the qual of the rulers, if not entirely, as least in manners all these naturally
resulted to dislike in manual labor.
23.
Was the attitude of the Filipinos on work good? why?
No. A saying that the swine is cooked in its own fat, and as among his bad qualties
he has the good one of applying to himself all the reproaches and censure that he
hears, Filipinos prefers to remain miserable and indolent to playing arole of the
wrethced pachyderm.
24.
How did gambling foster indolence among the Filipinos?
Before the coming of Spaniards, the passion for gambling is innate in adventurous
and excitable races and the Malayan race is one of them. The sugal (from Spanish
jugar, to gamble) indicated that gambling was unknown in the Philippines before
the Spaniards, the tagalog word laro (play) not being equivalent to sugal. The word
balasa is also from the Spanish word barajar. All these foreign origins of this
terrible plant which only produces vice and has found in the character of the Indio
a suitable soil, fertilized by circumstances. Gambling breeds dislike for steady and
difficult work by its promise of easy money.
25.
How did fiestas foster indolence among the Filipinos?
Consider that lack of capital, lack of means, paralyzes all activity and you will see
why the trials, imposts, exactions, he would have to give it to the curates for bulls,
scapularies, candles, and novenae, etc.
26.
How did curtailment of individual liberty foster indolence?
The facility with which individual liberty is curtailed; endless worry of all people
knowing that they are liable to a secret report, an administrative action, and to be
accused of being a filibuster (rebel) or a suspect, an accusation which not need to
be proven or is the presence of the accuser necessary to produce the desired
result; lack of confidence in the future.
27.
How did apathy of the government foster indolence among the Filipinos?
The apathy of the government itself toward everything pertaining to commerce or
agriculture contributes not a little to foster indolence. There is no encouragement
to all either for the manufacturer or the farmer; the government aid either when
the harvest is poor, when the locust waste, etc.
28.
Explain how the ownership of the big estates by the friars fostered indolence
among the Filipinos.
The fact that the best estates, the best tracts of land in some provinces, the most
profitable ones because of their accessibility, are in the land in some provinces, the
most profitable ones because of their accessibility, are in the hands of the religious
corporations whose desideratum is the ignorance and the condition of semiwretchedness of the Filipinos so that they can continue governing them and make
themselves necessary to their hapless existence, is one of the reasons why many
towns do not progress despite the efforts of their inhabitants.
29.
30.
How did deprivation of human dignity foster indolence?
He education of Filipino from the birth until the grave is brutalizing, and antihuman. For five or ten years the youth comes in contact with the books, choses by
the very same priests who boldly declare that it is an evil for the Filipinos to know
Castilian, that the Filipino should not be separated from his carabao, that he should
not have any further ambition, etc. During these 5-10 years the majority of the
students have grasped nothing more than that no one understands what the book
say, not even perhaps the professor themselves. During these 5-10 years the
students have to contend with the daily preaching that lowers human dignity,
gradually or brutally killing their self-respect that eternal, tenacious, persistent
effort to humble the naive, to make him accept the yoke, to reduce him to the level
of a beast, an effort supported by some private individuals, writers or not.
31.
Explain why lack of respect for human dignity is harmful.
Indio is a creature something more than a monkey but much less that a man, an
anthropoid, dull-witted, imbecile, exceedingly homely, dirty, meek, smiling, illdressed, indolent, vicious, lazy, brainless, unmoral, etc.
To what is retrogression? Is it the lucky civilization, is it the religion of salvation of
the friars, called euphemistically of Jesus Christ, that has produced the miracle,
that has atrophied his brain, paralyzed his heart and converted him into the vicious
animal that writers depict?
32.
Why did the Filipinos have the right to protest the deprivation of their human
rights?
The whole misfortune of the Filipinos of today is that they have become brutes only
half-way. The Filipino is convinced that to be happy it is necessary for him to lay
aside his dignity as a rational being, to hear Mass, to confess, obey the curate,
believe whatever he is told, pay whatever is demanded of him, pay and always
pay; toil suffer and keep silent, without protesting against an injustice; that is, not
to have a heart, brain, or gall creature with arms and a purse of gold theres the
ideal Indio! Unfortunately, or because the brutalization is not yet complete, or
because the quality of man is inherent in his being in spite of his condition, the
Indio protests, he still aspires, he thinks and strives to rise and theres the
trouble.
33.
Explain why people and government are correlated and complementary.
A stupid government is an anomaly among a righteous people, just as corrupt
people cannot exist under rulers and wise laws. Like people, like government, we
will say, paraphrasing a popular adage
34.
Explain why indolence is a corollary derived from lack of stimulus and vitality.
All these causes can be reduced to two classes: defects of education and lack of
national sentiment. The very limited home education, the tyrannical and sterile
education in the few educational centers, the blind subjection of youth to his
elders, influence the mind not to aspire to excel those who preceded him and