Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Usia
USIA MENIKAH
n
Persentase
20
38
45.2
>20
46
54.8
Total
84
100
Usia
PARITAS
n
Persentase
45
53.6
<3
39
46.4
Total
84
100
KONTRASEPSI ORAL
Usia
n
Persentase
>4
16
19.0
68
81.0
Total
84
100
Hubungan antara Usia Menikah, Paritas, dan Kontrasepsi Oral Terhadap Kejadian Ca Cervix
Ca Cervix
OR
CI 95%
Variabel
p-value
Ya
Tidak
Lower
Upper
Usia Menikah
20
33
5
0.000
27.133
8.257
89.161
>20
9
37
Paritas
3
32
13
7.138
0.000
2.718
18.746
<3
10
29
Kontrasepsi
Oral
0.000
22.778
2.841
182.636
>4
15
1
4
27
41
Kesimpulan: terdapat hubungan antara usia menikah, paritas, dan kontrasepsi oral terhadap
kejadian Ca Cervix (p < 0,05)
Hubungan antara Usia Menikah, Paritas, dan Kontrasepsi Oral Terhadap Kejadian Ca Cervix
Ca Cervix
Variabel
p-value
Ya
Tidak
Usia Menikah
20
33
5
0.000
>20
9
37
Paritas
3
32
13
0.000
<3
10
29
Kontrasepsi Oral
>4
15
1
0.000
4
27
41
Kesimpulan: terdapat hubungan antara usia menikah, paritas, dan kontrasepsi oral terhadap
kejadian Ca Cervix (p < 0,05)
Hubungan antara Usia Menikah, Paritas, dan Kontrasepsi Oral Terhadap Kejadian Ca Cervix
OR
CI 95%
Variabel
p-value
Lower
Upper
Usia Menikah
0.000
27.133
8.257
89.161
Paritas
7.138
0.000
2.718
18.746
Kontrasepsi Oral
0.003
22.778
2.841
182.636
LAMPIRAN
USIA MENIKAH
Cumulative
Frequency
Valid
Percent
Valid Percent
Percent
<=20
38
45.2
45.2
45.2
>20
46
54.8
54.8
100.0
Total
84
100.0
100.0
PARITAS
Cumulative
Frequency
Valid
Percent
Valid Percent
Percent
>=3
45
53.6
53.6
53.6
<3
39
46.4
46.4
100.0
Total
84
100.0
100.0
KONTRASEPSI ORAL
Cumulative
Frequency
Valid
Percent
Valid Percent
Percent
>4
16
19.0
19.0
19.0
<=4
68
81.0
81.0
100.0
Total
84
100.0
100.0
CA CERVIX
Cumulative
Frequency
Valid
Percent
Valid Percent
Percent
Ya
42
50.0
50.0
50.0
Tidak
42
50.0
50.0
100.0
Total
84
100.0
100.0
Tidak
Total
<=20
33
38
>20
37
46
42
42
84
Total
Chi-Square Tests
Value
df
sided)
sided)
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
37.675a
.000
Continuity Correctionb
35.032
.000
Likelihood Ratio
41.379
.000
.000
Linear-by-Linear Association
37.227
N of Valid Cases
.000
84
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 19,00.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
PARITAS * CA CERVIX
Crosstab
Count
CA CERVIX
Ya
PARITAS
Total
Tidak
Total
>=3
32
13
45
<3
10
29
39
42
42
84
.000
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2Value
df
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
17.279a
.000
Continuity Correctionb
15.508
.000
Likelihood Ratio
17.942
.000
.000
Linear-by-Linear Association
17.073
N of Valid Cases
.000
.000
84
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 19,50.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Tidak
Total
>4
15
16
<=4
27
41
68
42
42
84
Total
Chi-Square Tests
Asymp. Sig. (2Value
df
sided)
Pearson Chi-Square
15.132a
.000
Continuity Correctionb
13.048
.000
Likelihood Ratio
17.602
.000
.000
14.952
.000
84
a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8,00.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
.000
REGRESI LOGISTIK
Variables in the Equation
95% C.I.for EXP(B)
B
Step 1a
USIAMENIKA
S.E.
Wald
df
Sig.
Exp(B)
3.301
.607
29.571
.000
27.133
-5.188
1.029
25.406
.000
.006
Lower
8.257
Upper
89.161
H
Constant
S.E.
Wald
df
Sig.
Exp(B)
PARITAS
1.965
.493
15.920
.000
7.138
Constant
-2.866
.753
14.485
.000
.057
Lower
2.718
Upper
18.746
S.E.
Wald
df
Sig.
Exp(B)
3.126
1.062
8.661
.003
22.778
-5.834
2.080
7.863
.005
.003
L
Constant
Lower
Upper
2.841 182.636