Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FeedContents
1 Business Strategy
1.1 Definitions
1.1.2 Strategy
1.4.2 Incrementalism
back
This page introduces some of the main terms used in discussions about strategy. It also looks at the
meanings of the word 'strategy' and asks to what extent strategic planning is useful. It then goes on to
outline the main steps in formulating strategy
Definitions
Strategic planning
'Strategic planning' can also be known as 'long-term planning' or 'corporate planning'. Those alternative
names give some insight into the nature of strategic planning. It:
considers the longer term (think of a time-horizon of about five years or beyond)
considers the whole organisation.
Strategy
There is no universally accepted definition of strategy, and the word is used in different contexts to mean
different things. The following definition is as useful as any.
'Strategy is a pattern of activities that seeks to achieve the objectives of the organisation and adapt its
scope, resources and operations to environmental changes in the long term.'
This can be represented in the diagram below. Broadly, information about the organisation and its
environment is collected and rational decisions are made about future courses of action .
A modern adaptation
The Johnson, Scholes and Whittington (JSW) model of strategic planning is a modern development of the
rational planning model.
It consists of the three elements already discussed (analysis, choice,implementation) but instead of
presenting these linearly, it recognises interdependencies.
For example, it might only be at the strategy into action (implementation) stage that an organisation
discovers something that sheds light on its strategic position, resulting in a new strategy being formulated.
The other key difference is that Johnson, Scholes and Whittington argue that strategic planning can begin at
any point.
For example, firms might decide that they will launch an internet sales division without first carrying out any
strategic analysis or choosing how the new strategy might compete.
the environment (competitors, markets, regulations, discoveries etc). Key factors are often
summarised as opportunities and threats.
the strategic capability of the organisation (resources, competences). Key factors are often
summarised as strengths and weaknesses)
the expectation and power of stakeholders (what do the shareholders want? Will employees cooperate?).
Strategic choice
Strategic choice follows strategic analysis and is based upon the following three elements.
Selection of the strategy or option that the organisation will pursue. There could be more than one
strategy chosen but there is a chance of an inherent danger or disadvantage to any choice made.
Although there are techniques for evaluating specific options, the selection is often subjective and
likely to be influenced by the values of managers and other groups with an interest in the
organisation.
In addition to deciding the scope and direction of an organisation,choices also need to be made about how
to achieve the goal.
Broadly,there are two ways in which a strategy can be pursued:
Your FeedbackWe value your feedback on the topics or anything else you have found on our
site, so we can make it even better.Give Feedback
Organising/structuring. For example, should the organisation be split into European, US and Asian
divisions? How autonomous should divisions be? What parenting style would be appropriate?
Enabling an organisation's resources should support the chosen strategy. For example, appropriate
human resources and assets need to be acquired.
Managing change. Most strategic planning and implementation will involve change, so managing
change, in particular employees' fears and resistance, is crucial.
Emergent strategies do not arise out of conscious strategic planning, but result from a number of ad hoc
choices, perhaps made lower down the hierarchy. In this view, the final objective of the strategy is unclear
and elements still develop as the strategy proceeds, continuously adapting to human needs - the emergent
strategy is evolving, incremental and continuous.
Emergent strategies develop from patterns of behaviour; one idea leads to another, until a new pattern is
formed and a new strategy has emerged. For example, a salesman visits a customer out in the field. The
product isn't right, and together they work out some modifications. The salesman returns to the company
and puts the changes through; after two or three more rounds, they finally get it right. A new product
emerges, which eventually opens up a new market. The company has changed strategic course.
Incrementalism
Lindblom did not believe in the rational model to decision making as he suggested that in the real world it
was not used, citing the following reasons.
Strategic Managers do not evaluate all the possible options open to them but choose between
relatively few alternatives.
It does not normally involve an autonomous strategic planning team that impartially shifts
alternative options before choosing the best solution.
Strategy making tends to involve small-scale extensions of past policy - 'incrementals' - rather than
radical shifts following a comprehensive search.
Lindblom believed that strategy making involving small scale extensions of past practices would be more
successful as it was likely to be more acceptable as consultation, compromise and accommodation were
built into the process. He believed that comprehensive rational planning was impossible and likely to result
in disaster if actively pursued.
Freewheeling opportunism
Freewheeling opportunists do not like planning. They prefer to see and grab opportunities as they arise.
Intellectually, this is justified by saying that planning takes too much time and is too constraining.
Probably, the approach is adopted more for psychological reasons: some people simply do not like
planning.
Often such people are entrepreneurs who enjoy taking risks and the excitement of setting up new
ventures. However, once the ventures are up and running, the owners lose interest in the day-today repetitive administration needed to run a business.
Corporate Strategy
What business is the firm in? What businesses should it be in?
These activities need to be matched to the firm's environment, its resource capabilities and the values and
expectations of stakeholders.
How integrated should these businesses be?
Business Strategy
Looks at how each strategic business unit (SBU) attempts to achieve its mission within its chosen area of
activity.
Which products should be developed?
What approach should be taken to gain a competitive advantage?
Which markets to enter?
Johnson and Scholes suggest that viewing strategy through only one of these lenses can mean that
problems that the other lenses might show up are missed. For example, too much reliance on incremental
changes (strategy as experience) might overlook radical new developments that could be essential for the
organisation's success (strategy as ideas).
It is worth considering the very strong influence the design and experience lenses have in large
organisations and government departments. Often, the larger the organisation, the less able it is to adopt
early essential but radical changes.
Ideally, managers should try to look at strategy through all three lenses in turn.