Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Zhao Kai, Deng Jin-Gen, Yu Bao-Hua, Yuan Jun-Liang, Song Li-Hui, Lu Na-Na
Zhao Kai, 2Deng Jin-Gen, 3Yu Bao-Hua, 4Yuan Jun-Liang, 5Song Li-Hui, 6Lu Na-Na
1, First and Corresponding Author
China University of Petroleum (Beijing), zkaiup@126.com
2,
China University of Petroleum (Beijing), dengjingen@126.com
3,
China University of Petroleum (Beijing), yubaohua73@126.com
4,
China University of Petroleum (Beijing), yuan6688699@163.com
5,
China University of Petroleum (Beijing), czgmx_stdh@126.com
6,
Oil Production Technology Research Institute, Shengli Oilfield Branch. Co.,
nacl.257061@163.com
Abstract
In order to reduce the oil and gas drilling risk and cost, the calculating method of collapse pressure
was established to prevent borehole collapse in fractured shale formation. The method was coupled
with borehole concentrated stress, induced stress by crack opened and pore pressure change. The
influence law of borehole trajectory and crack occurrence was researched. The results show that,
collapse pressure increases substantially in small dip fractured shale formation when the well
deviation angle exceeds the critical value, and the increase speed is fastest in the direction of maximum
horizontal principle stress; collapse pressure is lower when crack is nearly vertical and the tendency
parallel to wellbore azimuth for the horizontal well, but when crack dip exceeds 30 and the tendency
is not parallel to wellbore azimuth, it is more dangerous for drilling due to the higher collapse
pressure. The research results can be used to solve wellbore instability problems and improve drilling
efficiency in the similar regions.
752
r1 =
( + ) R 2 ( - )
R2
3R 4 4R 2
Pw + H h (1- 2 )+ H h (1+ 4 - 2 )cos2
2
r
2
r
2
r
r
1 =-
( + )
R2
R 2 ( - )
3R 4
Pw + H h (1+ 2 )- H h (1+ 4 )cos2
2
r
2
r
2
r
z1 =v -[2(H -h )(
r1 =
(1)
R 2
) cos2]
r
(H -h ) 3R 4 2R 2
(1- 4 + 2 )sin2
2
r
r
Where r1 ,1 , z1 , r1 are the effective stress components in borehole cylindrical coordinate system,
MPa; H and h are the original maximum and minimum horizontal in-situ stress respectively, MPa;
v is the vertical in-situ stress; Pw is drilling column pressure, MPa; R is borehole radius, m; r is the
distance from the formation to the hole center, m; is the well round angle, deg; is Poisson ratio.
0
h
0
0
0 [L]T
v
(2)
Where: is well azimuth angle, deg; is well deviation angle, deg; L is the transformation
matrix of well deviation angle and well azimuth angle [9]:
coscos cossin -sin
[L]= -sin
cos
0
sincos sincos cos
(3)
The coordinate transformation from the principal in situ stress coordinate system (1,2,3) to the
borehole coordinate system (X,Y,Z) is realized by the two steps:
753
(1) According to the right hand rule, taking coordinate axis 3 as fixed axis, the coordinate system
(X1,Y1,Z1) is gained by rotating the coordinate system (1,2,3) by .
(2) According to the right hand rule, taking coordinate axis Y1 as fixed axis, the coordinate system
(X,Y,Z) is gained by rotating the coordinate system (X1,Y1,Z1) by .
Figure 2. Coordinate transformation from the principal in situ stress to the borehole coordinate system
rf L2 2
rf
3
1
1
x =-PF
cos f - f1 - f2 -1
sin f sin[ f1 + f2 ]+PF
1
L rf1rf2
2
2
2
2
r
r
f1 f2
r L2 2
3
1
1
rf
y =PF f
cos f - f1 - f2 -1
sin f sin[ f1 + f2 ]+PF
1
L rf1rf2
2
2
2
rf1rf2 2
(4)
r L2 2
3
xy =PF f
sin f cos[ f1 + f2 ]
L rf1rf2
2
Where x , y are the crack induced stresses along X-axis and Y-axis respectively, MPa; xy is
the induced shear stress, MPa; rf , rf1 , rf2 are the distance from any Point A to the centre and two ends of
the crack, m; f is the angle between the line from Point A to the centre point and X-axis, deg;
754
f1 , f2 are the angles between the lines from Point A to the two ends of the crack and X-axis
respectively, deg.
(5)
755
Where q is drilling fluid flow through crack unites; k is permeability parameter; b is the crack
aperture; dp is the pressure difference between adjacent elements; dL is the length of crack unites.
The crack aperture is the function of the crack aperture at zero normal effective stress and the crack
surface normal displacement:
b=b 0 -D n
(6)
Where b0 is the crack aperture at zero normal effective stress; D n is the crack surface normal
displacement controlled by the normal stress.
The coupled effect of crack deformation and pressure change is expressed as following [3]:
p(t)=p(t-t)+K f q
t
V
-K f
V(t)
V(t-t)
(7)
V=V(t)-V(t-t)
Where K f is the fluid volume modulus; V(t) is the crack unite volume.
The pore pressure change inside crack can be obtained through comprehensive solving equations (5)
~ (7), in the situation of general plane strain, the additional stress around the borehole induced by the
change of the pore pressure can be expressed as following:
r2 =
1-2 1
1- r 2
2 =-
r
R
1-2 1
1- r 2
r
R
(8)
1-2 f
z2 =
-f p r,t
1-
1 -3 =
o -23 tan
tan- tan 2 +1
(9)
Where, 1 and 3 are respectively maximum and minimum principle stress in formations, MPa;
is internal friction angle, deg; o is cohesion of formations, and it is function of the included angle
between maximum principle stress and weakness plane normal, MPa.
The total stress on the borehole plane is constituted by initial concentrated stress, the additional
stress induced by crack and pore pressure change:
756
r = r1 + r2 + x
= 1 + 2 + y
r = r1 + xy
(10)
Based the theory of elastic mechanics, the principal stress on the rock around borehole can be
expressed as following:
1 =
r +
-
( r )2 +r2
2
2
+
-
3 = r ( r )2 +2r
2
2
(11)
The collapse pressure can be gained by making the equation (11) substituted into equation (9).
6. Results discussion
Based the above calculation method, we calculated the changes of collapse pressure with different
well trajectory and crack occurrence, and the results were checked through on-site drilling data. The
calculation parameters are as followed: The depth, H = 3200m. Borehole diameter, Rw = 215.9mm.
Equivalent density of pore pressure, Pp = 1.03g/cm3. Effective stress coefficient, =0.8. Equivalent
density of in-situ stress, sigH = 1.85g/cm3, sigh = 1.65g/cm3, sigv = 2.23g/cm3. Azimuth of maximum
horizontal principle stress is N70E. Formation tendency is N75E and the dip is 10.
The changes of collapse pressure of directional well with different well deviation and azimuth are
shown in Figure 5. In this figure, circumferential direction is well azimuth angle, and radial direction is
well deviation angle. The on-site drilling data were used to check the validity of the calculation method
and result (Table 1). Compare results showed good consistency between the calculation result and onsite drilling data: Well 1# and 3# collapsed because the practical drilling fluid density was lower than
the collapse pressure, and no collapse occurred in Well 2# because the practical drilling fluid density
was higher than the collapse pressure. The results show that when drilling directional wells from
different directions in fractured shale, if the well deviation angle is less than a critical value, the
deviation has little effect on collapse pressure, but if the well deviation angle exceeds the critical value,
collapse pressure will increase substantially, and the increase speed is fastest in the direction of
maximum horizontal principle stress.
Because the validity of the calculation method and result was checked well, we calculated the
changes of collapse pressure with crack tendency and dip to guide the drilling operation in other
oilfield which has different crack occurrence. The changes of collapse pressure of horizontal well in the
direction of maximum horizontal principle stress with different crack tendency and dip are shown in
Figure 6. In this figure, circumferential direction is crack tendency, and radial direction is crack dip.
The result shows that: (1) When crack is nearly vertical and the tendency parallel to wellbore azimuth
(blue area), it is safest for drilling due to the lower collapse pressure; (2) When crack dip exceeds 30
and the tendency is not parallel to wellbore azimuth (red area), it is most dangerous for drilling due to
the higher collapse pressure.
757
Figure 5. The change law of collapse pressure with well deviation and azimuth angle
Table.1 On-site application
Well
number
Collapse
deviation ()
azimuth ()
pressure
(g/cm3)
Practical drilling
Borehole
3
collapsed or No
1#
20
N10E
1.31
1.26
Collapsed
2#
30
N195E
1.32
1.38
No
3#
41
N138E
1.38
1.33
Collapsed
758
Figure 6. The change law of collapse pressure with crack tendency and dip
7. Conclusion
The calculation method was established to calculate borehole collapse pressure when drilling in
fractured shale formation. The results based on the method were checked well through on-site drilling
data. Wellbore trajectory and crack occurrence has important influence on the collapse pressure.
(1) For the small dip formation, the collapse pressure is lower when the well deviation angle is less
than a critical value, but when the well deviation angle exceeds the critical value, collapse pressure will
increase substantially, and the increase speed is fastest in the direction of maximum horizontal
principle stress, so the highly-deviated well in fractured shale formation should be paid more attention
to prevent borehole instability.
(2) For the horizontal well in the direction of maximum horizontal principle stress, When crack is
nearly vertical and the tendency parallel to wellbore azimuth, it is safest for drilling due to the lower
collapse pressure, but when crack dip exceeds 30 and the tendency is not parallel to wellbore azimuth,
it is more dangerous for drilling due to the higher collapse pressure.
(3) The research results can be used to solve wellbore instability problems and improve drilling
efficiency in other similar regions.
8. Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51174219).
9. References
[1] Steinar Ottesen, Wellbore Stability in Fractured Rock, In Proceedings of the IADC/SPE Drilling
Conference and Exhibition, pp.1-8, 2010.
[2] Horacio Fontana, Martn Paris, Seehong Ong, Borehole Stability (Geomechanics) Modeling and
Drilling Optimization Practices Improve Drilling Curves in Naturally Fractured ShaleA South
Argentina Experience, In Proceedings of the SPE/IADC Middle East Drilling and Technology
Conference, pp.1-9, 2007.
759
[3] K. Yamamoto, Y. Shioya, N. Uryu, Discrete Element Approach for the Wellbore Instability of
Laminated and Fissured Rocks, In Proceedings of the SPE/ISRM Rock Mechanics Conference,
pp.1-9, 2002.
[4] X. Chen, C.P. Tan, C. Detournay, A study on wellbore stability in fractured rock masses with
impact of mud infiltration, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, Elsevier, vol.38, no.34, pp.145-154, 2003.
[5] Shailesh Ekbote, Younane Abousleiman, Porochemoelastic Solution for an Inclined Borehole in a
Transversely Isotropic Formation, Journal of engineering mechanics, American Society of Civil
Engineers (ASCE), vol.132, no.7, pp.754-763, 2006.
[6] A. Younessi, V. Rasouli, A fracture sliding potential index for wellbore stability analysis,
International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining Sciences, Elsevier, vol.47, no.6, pp.927-939,
2010.
[7] Rachel Geleta, Benjamin Loreta, Nasser Khalilib, Borehole stability analysis in a
thermoporoelastic dual-porosity medium, International Journal of Rock Mechanics & Mining
Sciences, American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), vol.50, no.1, pp.65-76, 2012.
[8] Zhao Yu, Peng Haiyou, Analysis on Stability of Rock Pillar in Highway Tunnel through Coal
Seam-Based on Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua, International Journal of Advancements in
Computing Technology, AICIT, vol.4, no.19, pp. 10-17, 2012.
[9] Aadnoy B.S., Chenevert M.E., Stability of Highly Inclined Boreholes, SPE Drilling
Engineering, Society of Petroleum Engineers, vol.2, no.4, pp. 364-374, 1987.
[10] Junlin Li, Shaoqin Zhang, Shuaishuai Hu, Researches of Interface Crack Tip of Double
Dissimilar Orthotropic Composite Materials, International Journal of Advancements in
Computing Technology, AICIT, vol.4, no.23, pp. 449-457, 2012.
[11] Mclamore R.T., and Gray K.E., A Strength Criterion for An Isotropic Rocks Based Upon
Experimental Observations, In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Institute of
Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, pp.1-28, 1967.
760