Professional Documents
Culture Documents
discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282309521
CORRELATION OF GEOMORPHOMETRIC
PARAMETERS FOR THE HYDROLOGICAL
CHARACTERIZATION OF MEGHADRIGEDDA
WATERSHED, VISAKHAPATNAM, INDIA A GIS
APPROACH
Article July 2012
CITATIONS
READS
22
3 authors:
Nooka Ratnam Kinthada
Usha Chirala
4 PUBLICATIONS 3 CITATIONS
21 PUBLICATIONS 87 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Usha Chirala et al. / International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology (IJEST)
CORRELATION OF
GEOMORPHOMETRIC PARAMETERS
FOR THE HYDROLOGICAL
CHARACTERIZATION OF
MEGHADRIGEDDA WATERSHED,
VISAKHAPATNAM, INDIA A GIS
APPROACH
USHA CHIRALA
Department of Geo-Engineering, College of Engineering,
Andhra University,Visakapatnam-530003, India
Email: u_chirala@yahoo.com
ISSN : 0975-5462
3169
Usha Chirala et al. / International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology (IJEST)
1. Introduction
Around 70% of Indias population is directly or indirectly dependent on agriculture based economy and
availability of water resource is a prerequisite for it. According to a report published by the Central
Water Commission (CWC) in 2001, the state of Andhra Pradesh is having a total number of 1157 watersheds,
out of which 106 are over exploited and 79 are in deteriorating condition. It is understandable that, optimal
utilization of the water resources is a key to the sustenance of the future economy. In this context, the
importance of water has been recognized and greater emphasis is being laid on its economic use and better
management.
Drainage basin geometry is the result of various factors that reshape the topography of the region over a period
of time. These factors influence the run-off, sediment, water discharge and also the nature of the pattern of
stream channels in a drainage basin. Such factors include climate, topography, bedrock, soil type, and vegetation
cover.. According to P. A. Allen and John R. Allen, 1990, these primary factors can be classified into
autocyclic and allocyclic controls. Allocyclic controls include climate, which controls run-off or discharge
and weathering of the parent rocks, and tectonics which controls basin slopes and relief of hinterlands in the
drainage basin. Proper understanding of rework of these elements gives insights into the characteristics of
sediment discharge and water resource availability which in turn have far reaching impacts on the dependants.
While it is essential to assess, record and measure these elements qualitatively and quantitatively, it may not be
easy to do that directly all the times.
In such scenario, analysis of drainage morphometry provides a bottom-up approach to unravel the influence and
magnitude of the factors responsible for the outcomes. On the other hand, study of the drainage morphometry
also plays a significant role in understanding the landform processes, physical properties of the soil and erosion
characteristics.
1.1. Literature Review
Few studies have been conducted on Meghadrigedda, among them are studies conducted by Nageswara Rao and
Narendra (2009 & 2006) to map and evaluate the impact of urban sprawl. They have also carried out a
preliminary analysis of Meghadrigedda river watershed. In yet another study, Nageswara Rao, et. al. (2008)
have also attempted to assess the ground water quality of Meghadrigedda watershed.
Various studies have been carried out on drainage morphometry analysis and its significance in watershed
modeling. Nooka Ratnam et. al. (2005) and Sujata Biswas et. al. (1999) have studied the drainage morphometry
and its importance in prioritizing the watersheds and estimated the sediment yield. Other recent works include
Chopra et. al. (2005)on morphometric analysis of Bhagra Phungotri and Hara Maja sub watersheds of
Gurdaspur district, Punjab. Srinivasa et. al. (2004) morphometric analysis on sub watersheds of Pawagada area,
Tumkur district, Karnataka.
ISSN : 0975-5462
3170
Usha Chirala et al. / International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology (IJEST)
+ 20.33m
+14.66m
10.00, million gallons per day
1.65 Mgd
8.35 Mgd
The study area is criss-crossed by a major and minor network of the roads, among the prominent, the national
highway 5 (NH 5), which connects Chennai and Kolkata, the other two important cities located in the east coast
of India. The other major roads passing through the study area connect the Cities, Visakhapatnam Anakapalli and Sabbavaram - Pendurti. The south eastern railway line connecting Visakhapatnam - Kottavalasa
is passing through the northern part of the study area.
ISSN : 0975-5462
3171
Usha Chirala et al. / International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology (IJEST)
2.3. Physiography
The areal extent of the entire study area is about 340.34 km2 which also includes the reservoir. Meghadrigedda,
Naravagedda and Borramgedda are the three major ephemeral rivers which form the basin area. The area is
covered by hill ranges of Eastern Ghats with steep slopes and deep gullies and is bounded by hill ranges
elevated between 70 to 594 m above the msl. The most prominent hill ranges are the Narava and Yerrakonda.
The study area is manifested mostly with deciduous dry and deciduous scrub vegetation types. The Narava RF
and Yerrakonda RF are the two designated reserved forests that covered by the study area.
The study area enjoys sub tropical climate conditions and the temperature ranges min. 140-200 C during the
month of December and max. 330-420 C during May. The area receives rainfall mostly during June-December
from both the southwest and northeast monsoon, and the annual average rainfall is 1110 mm. (Source: Zilla
Praja Parishad, Visakhapatnam). The river rises to its peak during October-November months and inundates the
surrounding low lying areas of Visakhapatnam city, due to the formation of cyclonic storms in the Bay of
Bengal. Though, the area is manifested with innumerable number of minor tanks which do not however
significantly reduce the flood peaks and their duration.
Geologically, the area is composed of sedimentary metamorphosed rocks of the Archean system. These rocks
have been intruded by granites, charconites and dolerites. The hill ranges are chiefly garnetiferous sillimanite
gneisses (Khondalites).
The area is characterized with brown and reddish sandy to loamy, lateritic and alluvium type of soils with less
clay and humus content. They are medium to fine grained, essentially, non-clayey and are easily erodable on
steep slopes during the heavy rainfall.
2.4. Methodology
Survey of India (SOI) topographic maps no.s 65 O/1, 65 O/2 and 65 O/5 on 1:50,000 covers the entire study
area. The SOI toposheets have been georeferenced and the drainage network has been demarcated as a vector
layer in *.shp format. Stream ordering was done according to the rules given by Strahlers (1964). Subsequently,
morphometric parameters have been computed using various standard mathematical equations suggested by
different renowned scholars. Processing and analysis of drainage network data was carried out using ArcGIS
software.
ISSN : 0975-5462
3172
Usha Chirala et al. / International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology (IJEST)
Table3. Mathematical formula adopted for computation of morphometric parameters.
S#
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Morphometric Parameters
Order of basin or stream segment
Number of streams of order
Total
no.
of
streams
within
basin of order
Mean length of stream segments of order
Total stream length within a basin of order
Mean length
Stream length
Form factor
Drainage density
Stream frequency
Texture
Texture ratio
Bifurcation ratio
the
Formula
N
EN
L/N
El
Total length of Streams / No. of streams
L/ L + 1
Basin Area / Length of the basin 2
Dd = L/A
F = N/A
T = F x Dd
T = N/P
N / N + 1
Order
No. of
streams
N1
N2
N3
N4
--
43
12
3
1
--
N1
N2
N3
N4
N5
N6
76
19
3
1
1
1
N1
N2
N3
N4
42
13
2
1
N1
N2
N3
N4
56
17
3
1
ISSN : 0975-5462
Length of streams
(km)
Mean length
(km)
Stream length
ratio
Bifurcation
ratio
3.58
4.00
3.00
-Avg. = 3.52
4.0
6.33
3.0
1.0
1.0
-Avg. = 3.06
3.23
6.50
2.00
-Avg. = 3.91
3.29
5.66
3.00
-Avg. = 3.98
3173
Usha Chirala et al. / International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology (IJEST)
N1
N2
N3
N4
18
5
2
1
N1
N2
N3
N4
N5
116
34
9
2
1
N1
N2
N3
N4
N5
204
55
10
4
1
N1
N2
N3
N4
N5
119
30
4
2
1
N1
N2
N3
N4
18
5
1
1
3.6
2.5
2.0
-Avg. =2.7
3.41
3.77
4.50
2.0
-Avg. = 3.42
3.70
5.50
5.0
4.0
-Avg. = 4.55
3.96
7.50
2.0
2.0
Avg. = 3.86
3.6
5.0
1.0
-Avg. = 3.2
ISSN : 0975-5462
3174
Usha Chirala et al. / International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology (IJEST)
ISSN : 0975-5462
3175
Usha Chirala et al. / International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology (IJEST)
ISSN : 0975-5462
3176
Usha Chirala et al. / International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology (IJEST)
Fig. 4 Map showing the distribution of hydromorphic units in the Meghadrigedda watershed.
ISSN : 0975-5462
3177
Usha Chirala et al. / International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology (IJEST)
Table 4. Stream numbers and their lengths.
Sub-basin
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
N1
42
76
42
56
18
116
204
119
19
L1
26.5
58
25
42.5
12
37.5
17.5
75
13
N2
11
17
13
17
5
34
55
30
4
L2
7
2
13.5
16.5
7
21.5
51.5
21.5
4
N3
3
3
2
3
2
9
8
4
1
L3
5
5
5
2.5
3
11
8
6
7.5
N4
1
1
1
1
1
2
4
2
1
L4
6
1
2
7.5
1
7.5
15
4
--
N5
-1
---1
1
1
--
L5
-12.5
---4.5
6.0
6.0
--
N6
-1
--------
L6
-3.5
--------
Sub-basin
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1st order
0.61
0.75
0.59
0.75
0.66
0.32
0.85
0.63
2nd order
0.60
1.31
1.03
0.97
1.40
0.69
0.93
0.71
3rd order
1.66
1.66
2.50
0.83
1.50
1.38
0.85
1.5
4th order
6
1
2
7.5
1
3.75
3.75
2
5th order
-12.5
---4.5
6
6
6th order
-3.5
-------
0.69
0.60
--
--
Sub-basin
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Area
(km2)
27.4
43.8
19.55
31.55
11
56.52
86.1
45.72
18.7
N1
N2
N3
N4
N5
N6
F1
F2
F3
F4
F5
F6
EN
43
76
43
56
18
116
204
119
18
12
19
13
17
5
34
55
30
50
3
3
3
3
2
9
10
4
60
1
1
1
1
1
2
4
2
1
-1
---1
1
1
--
-1
--------
1.56
1.73
2.19
1.77
1.63
2.05
2.36
2.6
0.96
0.43
0.43
0.66
0.53
0.45
0.6
0.63
0.65
0.26
0.1
0.06
0.1
0.09
0.18
0.15
0.11
0.08
0.05
0.03
0.02
0.05
0.03
0.09
0.03
0.04
0.04
0.05
-----0.01
0.01
0.02
--
----------
2.12
2.24
3
2.42
2.35
2.84
3.15
3.39
1.32
ISSN : 0975-5462
3178
Usha Chirala et al. / International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology (IJEST)
Density
Poor
Medium
Excellent
Range in km
0.5
0.5-1.5
1.5
From the drainage density map (Fig. 2), it is inferred that the Mehadrigedda basin is having an excellent
drainage density and the chances of soil erosion is more in these areas. Drainage density of the area is calculated
by using the formula L /A and the values are given in (Table 7).
3.2.5. Stream Frequency (F)
The total number of stream segments of all orders per unit area is known as stream frequency (Horton, 1932).
The study resulted in the stream frequency values varying from 1.36 - 3.18.
F = N / A = Number of streams / Area of the Basin.
3.3. Dissection Properties
Various basin dissection parameters were analysed for the prioritization of sub watersheds. The details are given
in the Table 7.
ISSN : 0975-5462
3179
Usha Chirala et al. / International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology (IJEST)
SubA
L
P
Re
Ff
Dd
T
T
F
Ac
Basin
1
27.4
10
24.5
0.87
0.27
1.63
2.40
3.48
2.15
2.18
2
43.8
19
45.5
0.73
0.12
2.37
2.21
5.45
2.30
0.26
3
19.55
7.5
19.0
0.83
0.34
2.32
3.05
6.86
2.96
0.68
4
31.55
10
25
1.00
0.31
2.18
3.06
5.31
2.44
0.63
5
11.0
5.0
14
0.70
0.44
2.09
1.85
4.93
2.36
0.70
6
62.07
11.0
32
1.79
0.51
1.37
5.06
3.56
2.60
0.76
7
86.10
16
35
1.71
0.33
2.97
7.82
9.44
3.18
0.88
8
45.90
10.62
29.5
1.37
0.40
2.45
5.28
7.71
3.51
0.71
9
18.25
10
23.0
0.58
0.18
1.28
1.08
1.74
1.36
0.43
Area ( A), Stream Length (L ), Perimeter (P), Elongation Ratio (Re), Form Factor (Ff), Drinage Density (Dd),
Texture Ration (T), Texture (T), Frequency (F), Circulatory Ratio (Ac)
3.3.2. Basin Elongation Ratio (Re)
The shape of any basin is expressed by an elongation ratio which is the ratio of diameter of a circle having same
perimeter to the maximum length of the basin (Schumm, 1956). The discharge characteristics of any watershed
are controlled by the elongation ratio. Normally, for a variety of geological and climatic types, this ratio ranges
between 0.6-1.0. As the relief increases, will so the discharge and surface runoff, while it decreases the basin
elongation ratio. The study area has shown the elongation ratio values between 0.58-1.71(Table 7).
3.3.3. Circulatory Ratio (Ac)
It is a shape measured related to stream flow. Circulatory ratio is the ratio of the basin area A to the area of
the circle. Ac is having the same perimeter as that of the basin (Miller 1953). Ac = A * 4 /P2
The property of Ac is that, it controls the discharge of the watershed. It is noticed that, Ac readings of
Mehadrigedda watershed range from 0.26-2.18, (Table 7).
ISSN : 0975-5462
3180
Usha Chirala et al. / International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology (IJEST)
A
A
L
P
Re
Ff
Dd
T
T
F
Ac
L
1
P
0.78
1
Re
0.84
0.99
1
Ff
0.88
0.44
0.54
1
Dd
-0.07
-0.30
-0.28
0.15
1
T
0.37
0.06
0.09
0.38
0.36
1
T
0.76
0.26
0.35
0.94
0.25
0.55
1
F
0.40
-0.05
0.01
0.55
0.33
0.92
0.76
1
Ac
0.36
-0.17
-0.08
0.66
0.43
0.69
0.84
0.90
1
0.07
-0.33
-0.30
0.28
0.36
0.45
0.50
0.62
0.71
1
For instance, the area (A) parameter of the basin have shown very positive correlation with remaining
parameters, except with form factor which means that most of these parameters are some way or other
influenced by the area of the basin and they share a direct proportional relationship. In case of stream length
ratio (L), it has shown a very strong correlation with basin perimeter (P) which indicates that both are
interdependent. It means that, stream length ration is directly proportional to the perimeter and in other words
the more the stream length ratio the more will be the basin perimeter. It is also observed that, the basin perimeter
is also having some positive correlation with the parameters like elongation Ratio (Re), drainage density (Dd),
and texture ratio (T), while it has shown a negative correlation with the remaining parameters indicating that, it
is independent of these factors. Basin perimeter (P), which is also one of the most influencing factors, however
shown positive correlation with some of the morphometric factors like Elongation Ratio (Re), Drainage Density
(Dd), Texture Ratio (T), and Texture (T) and it has shown negative correlation with other remaining factors.
Elongation ratio (Re), which determines the shape of the basin and controls the discharge throughput in the
basin has shown a complete positive correlation with all the other drainage morphometric parameters which
indicates that it has certain degree of influence over all the remaining parameters. Form Factor (Ff), which
determines whether a basin is circular or elongated in shape has also shown a positive correlation with the
remaining parameters. All other parameters like, drainage density (Dd), Texture Ratio (T), Texture (T),
Frequency (F) and Circulatory Ratio (Ac) have demonstrated a strong degree of positive correlation with their
ISSN : 0975-5462
3181
Usha Chirala et al. / International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology (IJEST)
peer parameters, indicating that they are all interdependent and some way or other have been influenced by one
on another. In a nutshell, the study of the correlation on 2-dimensional matrix has clearly shown the pull and
push nature of the drainage morphometric parameters on one on another. Though, it is possible to study and
evaluate each individual parameter separately and the drainage morphometric parameters seem to be
independent of each other, but in reality they are closely netted and have a strong control over the other. This
inadvertently indicates that, any change occurred to one of the factors is detrimental to another thus one needs to
be very careful in assessing the influence of these parameters in characterizing the behavior of the basin.
4. Evaluation of Hydromorphological Conditions
Geomorphometric analysis of the Meghadrigedda watershed also helped in the accurate delineation and
mapping of hydromorphological conditions of the study area. Based on the results obtained from various
morphometric parameters and through various field investigations, it has been identified that the study area is
characterized with various hydromorphological units, such as, structural hills, inselbergs, residual hills,
pediment zone, pediment, buried pediment shallow, buried sediment moderate and flood plain were identified
and mapped. The distribution of hydromorphic units in the watershed area has been mapped (Fi. 4). The map
clearly brings out the various geomorphological units in detail. The Meghadrigedda reservoir as well as the
numerous tanks, shown in blue, occupy a prominent place as be expected. The other striking features in the map
are structural hills shown in all around the watershed. Subsequently, the areal distribution and percent area
coverage of each hydromorphic units have been computed and presented in the Table 8.
As it can be seen from the hydromorphic unit wise classification map, majority of the Meghadrigedda watershed
area is covered by buried pediment moderate class covering an area of 124.52 km2 with a total cover of 33.9%,
followed by the floodplain which accounts for about 25.9% of watershed area housing 29 villages occupying an
area of 95.29 km2. The remaining area is covered by various hydromorphic units, such as, buried sediment
shallow with 11.74%, structural hills with 11.3%, inselbergs/residual hills with 10.3% and pediment with 6.89%
area respectively.
5. Conclusion
The morphometry analysis and subsequent correlation analysis of the Mehadrigedda watershed has revealed
that, it represents the dendritic to sub-dendritic drainage pattern with a moderate texture. The variation in stream
length ratios and stream bifurcation ratios of the sub-watersheds indicate that they have normal basin category
while the low drainage density suggests the presence of highly permeable sub-soil and coarse drainage texture.
The values of stream frequency indicate that, all the sub-basins show positive correlation with increasing stream
population. The values of form factor and circulatory ratio suggest that the basin is elongated while the subbasins are in circular form. Correlated analysis of the geomorphometric aspects highlighted the significance of
such analysis in establishing the degree of influence and interdependency of each parameter on another. Study
on Mapping of hydromorphic units and their spatial distribution helped in understanding erosion susceptibility
and water potentiality zones of the watershed.
The study demonstrates the effective use of GIS for geomorphometry analysis, prioritization of the subwatersheds of Mehadrigedda watershed. Results of the morphometric analysis also revealed that the subwatersheds have varying degrees of erosion intensity. Hence, suitable soil erosion control measures are required
for these sub-watersheds to prevent any further erosion activity.
6. Acknowledgements
We sincerely thank Prof. V. Venkateswara Rao of Department of Geo-Engineering, Andhra University and the
staff of INRIMT, Hyderabad for their support during the work.
7. References
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
Biswas.,S., Sudhakar,S and Desai, V.R.(1999): Prioritization of sub watersheds based on morphometric analysis of drainage basin. A
remote sensing and GIS approach. Journal of Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 27(3): 155-166.
Bull and Strahler A.N. (1958): Dimensional analysis applied to fluvially eroded landforms. Bull Geo Soc of Am. 69: 279-300.
Central Water Commission (2001) Water Resources of India, Introduction, CWC, New Delhi, India.
Chorley, R.J., 1957, Climate and morphometry. Jour.Geol., 65: 628-638.
Chorley, R.J., 1957. Illustrating the laws of morphometry. Geol. Mag.94(2): 140-150
Doorkamp, J.C and King, C.A.M., 1971. Numerical analysis in Geomorphology: An introduction. Edward Arnold (Publishers) Ltd.
London, 372
ISSN : 0975-5462
3182
Usha Chirala et al. / International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology (IJEST)
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25]
Horton R.E(1945) Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins: Hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology.
Bulletin of the Geological R.E, 1945 Erosional development of stream and their drainage basin. Hydrological approach to Quantitative
morphology, Bull of the Geophysical Society of America., 56 :275-370.
Johnson,(1933), Available relief and texture of topography: A discussion. Jour. Geol., 41: 293-305.
Miller (1953),A quantitative geomorphic study of drainage basins characteristics in the Clinch mountain area, Virginia, Tennessee,
technical report 3, Office of the naval research. Dept of Geology, Columbia University, New York.
Morisawa M.E.(1962). Relation of quantitative geomorphology of streams flow in representative watersheds of Appalachian plateau
province, Bull Geol.Soc America.V.73:1025-1046.
Melton M.A. (1958) Correlation structure of morphometric properties of drainage systems and their controlling agents. Jour. Geol. 66:
442-460.
Nageswara Rao K and Narendra K (2006) Mapping and evaluation of urban sprawling in the Mehadrigedda watershed in
Visakhapatnam metropolitan region using remote sensing and GIS. Current Science. 91(11):1552-1557.
Narendra K and Nageswara Rao K (2006).Morphometry of the Meghadrigedda watershed, Visakhapatnam district, Andhra Pradesh
using GIS and Resourcesat data. J Indian Soc Remote Sens. 34(2): 101-110.
Nageswara Rao K, Narendra K, Venkateswarlu P (2008) Assessment of groundwater quality in Mehadrigedda watershed,
Visakhapatnam district, Andhra Pradesh, India. Pollution Research. 26(3): 313-324.
Nooka Ratnam K, Srivastasava Y.K, Venkateswarao V, Amminedu E, and Murthy K.S.R (2005) Check dam positioning by
prioritization of micro-watersheds using SYI model and morphometric analysis - Remote sensing and GIS perspective. J Indian Soc
Remote Sens 33(1): 25-38.
Phillip. A. Allen and John R. Allen (1990) Basin Analysis Principles and Application (1st edit.), Blackwell Publishing, Chapter 7,
194.
Schumm S.A. (1956) Evolution of drainage systems and slopes in badlands at Perth Amboy, New Jersey. Geol .soc. Am. Bull. 67:
597-646.
Sheidegger A.E. (1966) Scholastic branching process and the law of stream numbers water resources Res., 2(2): 199-203.
Shreve R.L. (1967). Infinitive topologically random channel networks. Jour Geol., 77: 397-414.
Smith K.G. (1950) Standards for grading texture of erosional topography. Am. Jour Sci., 248: 655-668.
Strahler A.N. (1954) Statistical analysis in geomorphic research, Jour Geol 62: 1-25.
Strahler A.N. (1957) Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Trans. Am, Geophys. union, 38: 913-920.
Strahler A.N. (1964) Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basins and channel networks, section 4-II. In: Handbook of applied
Hydrology, edited by V.T Chow. Mc Graw-Hill 4-39.
Sujata Biswas, Sudhakar S, and Desai V.R., (1999) Prioritization of sub watersheds based on morphometric analysis of drainage basin
- A remote sensing and GIS approach. J Indian Soc Remote Sens. 27(3): 155-166.
Zerentz, E.R., 1932, Drainage patterns and their significance. Jour.Geol., 40, : 498-521.
ISSN : 0975-5462
3183