Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
Of the various sources of identication that emerged under the conditions of modernity, the nation-state was undoubtedly one of the most
prominent. Self-consciousness became truly modern when individuals
were able to transcend familial, tribal, village, provincial, and subnational ethnic loyalties to imagine themselves as members of a larger
national political community with a distinct national identity. In
addition, the nation, as a source of identication and belonging, has
become personally meaningful because it is embedded and situated in
Ethnic and Racial Studies Vol. 24 No. 3 May 2001 pp. 412432
2001 Taylor & Francis Ltd ISSN 0141-9870 print/1466-4356 online
DOI:10.1080/01419870020036729
413
broader global contexts in the modern world. With the advent of modern
communications technologies and electronic media, distant global events
and conditions have become locally relevant, forcing individuals to
respond to such pressures when constructing their national identities (cf.
Giddens 1991, pp. 4, 27, 32). In other words, modernity imposes new
structural constraints on the construction of national identities, which
must now be negotiated and conceptualized within constantly changing
global contexts.
Although migration itself is obviously not a distinctive feature of
modernity, it is one means through which self-consciousness has been
modernized because identities frequently become nationalized and
globally located through the migratory process. When migrants relocate
abroad, they often experience a certain amount of ethnic marginalization, cultural difference, and discrimination which causes them to react
against the host society by reafrming and renewing their national loyalties to their country of origin. This produces a type of deterritorialized
migrant nationalism in which national sentiments are solidied outside
the territorial boundaries of the nation-state.1 At the same time, the
national identities of migrants become interrelated to the global milieu
since the relative position of their home country within the international
world order inuences their ethnic status and identity in the majority
host society.
In this article, I argue that the history of Japanese emigration and
settlement in Brazil can be interpreted as an identity struggle which
occurred under the global constraints of modernity. The immigration,
minority status, and ethnonational identity of the Japanese in Brazil
were contested and negotiated under specic local circumstances which
were conditioned by Japans changing position in the global order.
Japanese emigration to Brazil in the early 1900s became possible
because of Japans newly acquired global stature as an emerging industrial power, which made Brazil willing to accept the Japanese, although
they were viewed as inferior substitutes for European workers. As a
result, the Japanese were initially treated with benign tolerance and
were not subject to overt discrimination in Brazil. Although their migration increased their national consciousness in Brazil, this nationalization of identity was simply a reaction to their encounter with ethnically
different populations in a foreign country. However, as a rapidly
modernizing Japan continued to rise in global status to become not only
Asias leading nation but eventually a threatening global power supposedly intent on world domination, Brazilian perceptions of the
Japanese immigrants signicantly worsened, leading to considerable
anti-Japanese sentiment and ethnic discrimination. The Japanese in
Brazil responded to such unfavourable ethnic conditions through a
virulent Japanese ultra-nationalism, which became an effective means
to counter Brazilian xenophobia. However, their ethnic reaction also
414
diverged along generational lines and differential levels of acculturation. A small group of assimilation-oriented nisei (the second generation born in Brazil) attempted to avoid majority discrimination by
increasing their sociocultural integration in Brazilian society and negotiating a more synthetic and inclusive ethnic identity that emphasized
their Brazilian national allegiance.
In this manner, when Japanese emigrants emerged from their rural
villages in Japan and became part of the global movement of populations, their ethnic identity became truly modern, that is, not only fully
nationalized, but globally contextualized. Although most of the Japanese
went to Brazil as temporary migrants with dreams of returning to Japan
in several years with considerable wealth, reality proved to be much
more difcult and a large majority of them settled permanently in Brazil
with their families. As expected, the ethnicity of their descendants in
Brazil continues to remain quite sensitive to shifts in Japans global
image. In recent decades, the ethnic identity of second and third generation Japanese-Brazilians has again been renegotiated in the context of
Japans dramatic rise to the top of the global hierarchy of nations as a
First World economic superpower. Partly because of Japans current
global prestige, the Japanese-Brazilians have again come to assert and
maintain a prominent Japanese ethnic identity, but for very different
reasons than their immigrant ancestors.
This type of analysis which globally contextualizes ethnicity contrasts
with traditional approaches in which ethnic minority status and identity
were analysed as products of purely local conditions such as persisting
cultural differences, ethno-racial perceptions and ideologies, ethnic
exclusion and discrimination, internally cohesive communities, intergroup conict, and historical consciousness of ethnic ancestry and legacy.
Of course, by emphasizing the importance of global conditions in constituting ethnic relations, I do not intend to promote a mono-casual
analysis by attributing the nature of Japanese ethnic experiences in
Brazil simply to Japans shifting geopolitical status. Instead, I simply wish
to highlight an aspect of modern ethno-national identities that has not
received sufcient attention in the literature by illustrating how local
forces which are usually understood to shape ethnicity are themselves
frequently conditioned by a larger global milieu.
The structural inferiority of Japan in the global order: Japanese
emigration and minority status in Brazil
Japan as a backward but modernizing Asian nation: the acceptance of
Japanese immigrants by Brazil
At the beginning of the twentieth century, the Japanese government was
actively promoting emigration to the Americas as an effective means to
415
alleviate its surplus rural population, which was suffering from declining
agricultural prices and increasing debt and unemployment. At the same
time, Brazil was in search of new sources of immigrant labour in order
to supply a rapidly expanding coffee plantation economy. However,
because of ideologies of racial superiority that equated European races
with human progress and advancement, the Brazilian political elite
wished to whiten a racially-mixed Brazilian populace through further
European immigration from Portugal, Spain, and Italy (see Pickel 1993,
pp. 1214, 18; Lesser 1999, p. 82) and was initially unwilling to admit
immigrants from Asia (Sasaki 1958, pp. 89; Nogueira 1983, p. 87).
However, as immigration from Europe continued to decline, Brazil was
forced to consider the eventual acceptance of less racially desirable, nonEuropean migrants to meet its increasing labour needs.
In this manner, because of a hegemonic Euro-American discourse
that deemed the yellow race inferior to the white race, Japanese emigration to Brazil was initially negotiated by Japan from a global
position of structural inferiority as a backward Asian nation.
However, within this perceived global hierarchy between the West
and the East, the Brazilian political elite eventually decided to accept
immigrants from Japan because of its emergence from the Asian backwaters as a country which was rapidly industrializing and becoming an
advanced, modernized nation (see Lesser 1999, ch. 4). By the beginning of the twentieth century, Japan had not only easily won the SinoJapanese War but had decisively defeated Russia in the
Russo-Japanese War, which seemingly indicated that in terms of
military power and technological advancement, Japan was not only
Asias pre-eminent leader, but was gradually encroaching on the privileged and secure position of Western superiority.
Some ofcials in the Brazilian government were impressed with
Japanese technological and economic development and came to favour
Japanese immigration (Lesser 1999, p. 83). Brazilian Ministers who
visited Japan at the time noted that although the Japanese used to be
seen as a despicable race, they showed an amazing ability to assimilate
European civilization and customs in contrast to other Asian peoples
such as the Chinese, who had previously been rejected as potential immigrants partly on grounds of their inferiority. In fact, some among the
Brazilian elite saw the Japanese as equals, or even superior to immigrants from backward European countries (for example, see Lesser 1999,
p. 87). The rst Japanese government immigration envoy to Brazil, Sho
Nemoto, even argued that the Japanese were the whites of Asia, a claim
that was emphasized by other Japanese diplomats as well (Lesser 1999,
p. 82). Although this increasingly favourable perception of the Japanese
continued to be actively contested by some Brazilian ofcials, who felt
that mixing inferior races with the Brazilian population would be dangerous and undermine Brazils national project of racial whitening (Lesser
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
which eventually unied under the Shindo Renmei (The League of the
Way of the {Emperors} Subjects), whose leaders were furious at Brazil
for becoming the enemy of the Japanese. Shindo Renmei persisted for
years after the war and its main purpose was to return the Japanese immigrant community to true Japanese ways based on Emperor worship and
to foster Japanese nationalist spirit through the maintenance of Japanese
culture, language, and religions. When World War II ended, the Shindo
Renmei, utterly convinced that Japan could never be defeated, refused
to believe that the country had lost the war. Because of their ethnic isolation, the conscation of radios, and the ban on Japanese language newspapers, most of the Japanese in Brazil did not receive much information
from the outside world. The Shindo Renmei exploited this situation by
engaging in an active propaganda campaign that insistently proclaimed
Japans glorious victory in the war, which found many willing believers
among the Japanese immigrants. In fact, an amazing 95 per cent of the
Japanese in Brazil are estimated to have been members of Shindo
Renmei at one point (Maeyama 1982, p. 179) and it was rare to nd a
region where the group was not operating (Handa 1987, p. 675).
Soon the immigrant community divided into two antagonistic factions.
Those who believed in Japans victory were referred to as the kachi-gumi
(the victory group) and the small minority who felt that the reality of
Japans defeat should be acknowledged were called the make-gumi (the
defeat group).4 However, the nationalistic fanaticism of the kachi-gumi
became so extreme and militant that they soon created tokkotai (attack
teams) to terrorize, punish, and assassinate those of the make-gumi as
traitors. Such attacks and violence were not always contained within the
Japanese immigrant community but sometimes directed at Brazilians as
well. The fanatical belief in Japans victory in World War II remained
unshaken among Shindo Renmei leaders for years despite evidence to
the contrary and attempts by Brazilian and Japanese authorities to
convince them of the truth.
Of course, ultranationalist movements among the Japanese in Brazil
were not simply a counter-response to mounting Brazilian discrimination
and ethnic repression caused by Japans status as the global enemy of
the Americas. Because the Japanese immigrants had been inculcated
with strong patriotic beliefs in Japan and remained staunchly loyal to
their homeland, the outbreak of World War II naturally intensied their
nationalist sentiments. However, this strengthening of Japanese
nationalism would not have reached fanatic proportions had it not been
fuelled by a globally conditioned, anti-Japanese xenophobia in Brazil.
The avoidance of discrimination through ethnic accommodation and
integration: the development of inclusive dual ethnic identities
Since the manner in which individuals adapt to a certain minority status
created by global conditions ultimately depends on personal perceptions
425
and ethnic abilities, the same external pressures and constraints can
produce varied responses among different individuals. In the period
immediately before and during the war, the Brazilian-born nisei found
themselves caught between the anti-Japanese nationalism of the Brazilian Vargas regime and the anti-Brazilian counter-nationalism among the
Japanese in Brazil and were forced to choose sides. Most of the nisei,
especially in the rural areas, maintained their loyalty to the Japanese
immigrant community (Maeyama 1982, pp. 401; Handa 1987, p. 600).
However, a still small, but increasingly prominent group of nisei students
(as well as some issei students) had already begun to emerge who lived
in urban areas and had been educated in Brazilian schools. They had
acquired Brazilian cultural and linguistic competence and had already
begun to incorporate themselves into Brazilian society. As a result,
instead of embracing a defensive Japanese counter-nationalism when
faced with increasing Brazilian prejudice and discrimination, they
adopted a more accommodative and conciliatory ethnic approach by
negotiating a synthetic and bi-cultural ethnic identity as Japanese-Brazilians (Lesser 1999, pp. 1234). Such inclusive dual ethnic identities
enabled them to express a certain amount of afliation, if not loyalty
towards Brazil in an attempt to overcome Brazilian discrimination and
eventually escape their stigmatized minority status by furthering their
sociocultural assimilation to mainstream society.
These acculturated urban nisei students were generally shocked and
embarrassed by the fanatical intensication of Japanese nationalism that
they witnessed among their ethnic peers and were afraid it would further
increase Brazilian discrimination and anti-Japanese feelings, threatening
their socio-economic future in Brazil (Maeyama 1996, pp. 2578).5 To
counter such extreme reactions, they created their own student organizations before the war, such as the Nipo-Brasileiro (Japanese-Brazilian)
Student League, convened meetings, and published newspapers and
magazines that intended to promote a more accommodative ethnic
approach and greater acculturation by claiming that they had developed
loyalties to Brazil and were in a transition stage from Japanese to Brazilian (Maeyama 1982, pp. 445; Lesser 1999, pp. 1301). These secondgeneration youth saw themselves as people who were born and would
remain permanently in Brazil and whose descendants would eventually
become completely Brazilian. As a result, they began to regard their
homeland as Brazil (instead of Japan) and expressed increased afliation, if not dedication and love towards the Brazilian nation (Maeyama
1979, p. 602; Maeyama 1982, pp. 401).
Of course, there was considerable internal debate within the NipoBrazilian Student League about what acculturation meant and to what
extent it should be pursued. Although some attempted to deny any connection to Japan by claiming that they had already become completely
Brazilian (Lesser 1999, p. 131), an accommodative, dual ethnic approach
prevailed in which an acknowledgement of the importance of their
426
427
428
429
conditions. This article has simply explored the extent to which global
contingencies are relevant as a key factor in the construction of ethnic
status and identity. In fact, I have argued that the true signicance of
local determinants of ethnicity cannot be fully appreciated without this
type of global contextualization. Global conditions can either exacerbate
the negative local reception of an immigrant group or further reinforce
already positive local perceptions of its ethnicity. Indeed, this intrusion
of the global into the local is what makes ethnicity truly modern.
However, when the ethnicity of immigrant minority groups becomes
truly modern and tied to global conditions, it also becomes vulnerable
to constant and unpredictable changes in the international world order.
Although the Japanese-Brazilians have now socio-economically established themselves in Brazil after many decades of struggle and are highly
regarded in Brazilian society, their current positive minority status has
also been dependent on a relatively recent change in Japans global
position and therefore remains fundamentally insecure and subject to
historical vicissitudes. Indeed, some Japanese-Brazilians are aware that
a negative turn of international events could damage Japans global
status and therefore erode the ethnic gains they have made in Brazil,
even possibly returning them to their previous negative minority status.
Such lingering ethnic unease was expressed by Mario, a prominent nisei
businessman in So Paulo:
The status of the Japanese-Brazilians is closely linked to Japan,
although most of us have had nothing to do with the country. How
Japan is perceived directly inuences how we are perceived here in
Brazil. I am bothered by this. If Japan does something bad, or its status
in the world declines, it will have a negative effect on us in Brazil as
well.
Indeed, this ability of changing global conditions to suddenly reconstitute a minority groups ethnic status is undoubtedly one of the characteristics of ethnicity in the modern world. However, Mario had not
realized that the next change in the ethnic minority status of the
Japanese-Brazilians would come not from a decline in Japans global
prestige, but from return migration to Japan itself.
Epilogue: from emigration to immigration
Approximately eighty years after the rst Japanese emigrants set foot in
Brazil, the tables were suddenly turned on the Japanese-Brazilians in a
cruel twist of fate. In the 1980s, the Brazilian economy crumbled and
entered a prolonged and severe period of crisis. Meanwhile, the Japanese
economy had grown to become the second largest in the world. Confronted by shrinking economic fortunes in Brazil and lured to Japan by
430
431
4.
A survey conducted in 1952 indicated that only 14.5 per cent of the Japanese in Brazil
considered themselves part of the make-gumi. Kachi-gumi sympathizers consisted of 56.9
per cent of the population and 28.6 per cent were fanatics (Kumasaka and Saito 1973).
5.
After the war, many of these individuals became part of the previously mentioned
make-gumi that openly criticized and attacked the Shindo Renmei.
6.
According to Maeyama, such tendencies among the nisei persisted into the 1960s,
when they nally began to disappear.
7.
The Japanese-Brazilians are not granted citizenship upon return to Japan in contrast
to the ethnic Germans or European descendants in Latin America who have recently
return-migrated to their ancestral homelands.
References
APPADURAI, ARJUN 1996 Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization,
Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press
BUTSUGAN, SUMI 1980 Participao Social e Tendncia de Casamentos Intertnicos,
in Hiroshi Saito (ed.), A Presena Japonsa no Brasil, So Paulo: Editra da Universidade
de So Paulo, pp. 101112
CARDOSO, RUTH CORRA LEITE 1973 O Papel das Associaes Juvenis na Aculturao dos Japoneses, in Hiroshi Saito and Takashi Maeyama (eds), Assimilao e Integrao dos Japoneses no Brasil, Petrpolis, Rio de Janeiro: Editora Vozes, pp. 317345
CASTELLS, MANUEL 1997 The Power of Identity, Malden, MA: B. Blackwell
CLIFFORD, JAMES 1994 Diasporas, Cultural Anthropology, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 302338
FUKUNAGA, PATRICK MAKOTO 1983 The Brazilian Experience: The Japanese Immigrants During the Period of the Vargas Regime and the Immediate Aftermath, 19301946
(Dissertation led at University of California, Santa Barbara), Ann Arbor, MI: University
Microlms International
GELLNER, ERNEST 1983 Nations and Nationalism, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
GIDDENS, ANTHONY 1991 Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late
Modern Age, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
HANDA, TOMOO 1987 O Imigrante Japons: Histria de sua Vida no Brasil, So Paulo:
Centro de Estudos Nipo-Brasileiros
JORNAL DO COMRCIO 1942 O Perigo Japons, Rio de Janeiro: Rodrigues & CIA
KUMASAKA, Y. and SAITO, HIROSHI 1973 Kachigumi: Uma Deluso Coletiva Entre
os Japoneses e seus Decendentes no Brasil, in Hiroshi Saito and Takashi Maeyama (eds),
Assimilao e Integrao dos Japoneses no Brasil, Petrpolis, Rio de Janeiro: Editora
Vozes, pp. 448464
LEO, VALDEMAR CARNEIRO 1990 A Crise da Imigrao Japonesa no Brasil,
Braslia: Instituto de Pesquisa de Relaes Internacionais
LESSER, JEFFREY 1999 Negotiating National Identity: Immigrants, Minorities, and the
Struggle for Ethnicity in Brazil, Durham, NC: Duke University Press
MAEYAMA, TAKASHI 1979 Ethnicity, secret societies, and associations: the Japanese
in Brazil, Comparative Studies in Society and History, vol. 21, no.4, pp. 589610
1982 Imin no Nihon Kaiki Undo, Tokyo: NHK Books
1996 Esunishitei to Burajiru Nikkeijin, Tokyo: Ochanomizu Shobo
NIEMEYER, WALDYR 1925 O Japonez no Brazil: Uma Face do Nosso Problema
Imigratrio, Rio de Janeiro: Editora Brasileira
NOGUEIRA, ARLINDA ROCHA 1973 Consideraes Gerais Sobre a Imigrao
Japonesa para o Estado de So Paulo entre 1908 e 1922, in Hiroshi Saito and Takashi
Maeyama (eds), Assimilao e Integrao dos Japoneses no Brasil, Petrpolis, Rio de
Janeiro: Editora Vozes, pp. 3255
1983 Imigraao Japonsa na Histria Contempornea do Brasil, So Paulo: Centro de
Estudos Nipo-Brasileiros
432
PICKEL, MARY LOUISE 1993 Race, Nationalism, and Domestic Politics in the 1934
Brazilian Constituent Assembly: The Debate on Japanese Immigration (MA Thesis),
University of Texas at Austin
SAITO, HIROSHI 1961 O Japons no Brasil: Estudo de Mobilidade e Fixaao, So Paulo:
Editra Sociologia e Politica
1973 Margem da Contribuio de Japoneses na Horticultura de So Paulo, in
Hiroshi Saito and Takashi Maeyama (eds), Assimilao e Integrao dos Japoneses no
Brasil, Petrpolis, Rio de Janeiro: Editora Vozes, pp. 189200
SAKURAI, CLIA 1993 Romanceiro da Imigrao Japonesa, So Paulo: Editora Sumar
1995 A Fase Romntica da Poltica: Os Primeiros Deputados Nikkeis no Brasil, in
Boris Fausto, Oswaldo Truzzi, Roberto Grn, and Clia Sakurai (eds), Imigrao e Poltica
em So Paulo, So Paulo: Editora Sumar, pp. 127177
SASAKI, JOHN 1958 Japanese Emigrants in Brazil: A Study of Integration of the Japanese
People, Rio de Janeiro: National Confederation of the Industry, Departamento Nacional
SIMPSON, GEORGE EATON and YINGER, J. MILTON 1972 Racial and Cultural
Minorities: An Analysis of Prejudice and Discrimination, New York: Harper and Row
TSUDA, TAKEYUKI 1998 The stigma of ethnic difference: the structure of prejudice
and discrimination towards Japans new immigrant minority, Journal of Japanese
Studies, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 317359
1999a The motivation to migrate: the ethnic and sociocultural constitution of the
Japanese-Brazilian return migration system, Economic Development and Cultural Change,
vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 131
1999b The permanence of Temporary Migration: the structural embeddedness
of Japanese-Brazilian migrant workers in Japan, Journal of Asian Studies, vol. 58, no. 3,
pp. 687722
1999c Transnational migration and the nationalization of ethnic identity among
Japanese-Brazilian return migrants, Ethos: Journal of the Society for Psychological
Anthropology, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 145179
Copyright of Ethnic & Racial Studies is the property of Routledge and its content may not be copied or emailed
to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However,
users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.