Republic of the Philippines

PROFESSIONAL REGULATION COMMISSION

Manila

SPECIAL CERTIFICATION EXAMINATION IN OCULAR PHARMACOLOGY

FOR OPTOMETRISTS
RESULT RELEASED IN TWO (2) WORKING DAYS

The Professional Regulation Commission (PRC) announces that 3 out of 11 passed the
Special Certification Examination in Ocular Pharmacology for Optometrists given by the
Board of Optometry in Manila this November 2016.
The members of the Board of Optometry are Dr. Teresita R. Yambot, Chairman;
Dr. Mary Rose S. Paredes, Dr. Maria Elizabeth B. Valconcha, Dr. Bernardita A. Garcia and
Dr. Vivian S. Sarabia, Members.

Schedule of registration for the issuance of Professional Identification Card (ID)

and Certificate of Registration will be on November 29, 2016. Those who will register
are required to bring the following: Notice of admission, duly accomplished Oath Form
or Panunumpa ng Propesyonal, 2 pieces passport size picture (colored with white
background and complete name tag), 2 sets of documentary stamps. Successful
examinees should personally register and sign in the Roster of Registered
Professionals.
The performance of schools in the November 2016 Ocular Pharmacology (For
Optometrist) Licensure Examination in alphabetical order as per R.A. 8981 otherwise known as
PRC Modernization Act of 2000 Section 7(m) "To monitor the performance of schools in
licensure examinations and publish the results thereof in a newspaper of national circulation" is
as follows:
NOVEMBER 2016 OCULAR PHARMACOLOGY (FOR OPTOMETRIST) LICENSURE EXAM.
PERFORMANCE OF SCHOOLS IN ALPHABETICAL ORDER
FIRST TIMERS
SEQ.
NO.

SCHOOL

REPEATERS

OVERALL PERFORMANCE

PASSED

FAILED

TOTAL

%
PASSED

PASSED

FAILED

TOTAL

%
PASSED

PASSED

FAILED

TOTAL

%
PASSED

CENTRO ESCOLAR
UNIVERSITY-MANILA

0.00%

14.29%

14.29%

DE OCAMPO MEMORIAL
COLLEGE

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

MANILA CENTRAL
UNIVERSITY-CALOOCAN
CITY

0.00%

100.00%

100.00%

MANILA CENTRAL
UNIVERSITY-MANILA

0.00%

100.00%

100.00%

PINES CITY COLLEGE

(PCEC)

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

OVERALL TOTAL

0.00%

11

27.27%

11

27.27%

xxxxxxxxxx N O T H I N G F O L L O W S xxxxxxxxxx
Any discrepancy in the report is not intentional on the part of the Commission, but rather due to
miscoding of school codes by the examinees themselves. Concerned schools may write the
Commission for correction.