Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Deal Snapshot
1.
The continuous growth and expansion of banks internationally and the requirement for
Indian banks to meet global standards have promoted the requirement for consolidation in
the banking sector. The Report of the Committee on Financial Sector Reforms headed by
the former RBI Governor Mr. Raghuram Rajan had suggested encouragement of
consolidation in banks as against forceful consolidation. The committee had suggested that
considering the fragmented nature of the Indian banking sector, consolidation will help
banks in setting their foot in the larger field and become a global player in order to integrate
with the global economy and to achieve fuller capital account convertibility.
Consolidation is considered to be beneficial in various ways. It is believed that larger banks
are more efficient and profitable than smaller ones and generate greater economies of scale.
The efficiency may be in terms of effective management, lower costs and higher quality of
the services provided. Consolidation of banks which cater to different segments will help in
geographical diversification and entry into new markets along with economies of scale.
Additionally, larger banks may be in a position to mitigate the risks incurred in financing
and meeting stringent international regulatory norms.
A highly regulated industry, the banking industry has seen very few mergers and
acquisitions since the privatization of the sector. Traditionally most cases of bank mergers
had taken place on the directions of RBI. Its ground was to merge weak banks with the
stronger banks to maintain a balance in the economy. Though not very high in number,
market led mergers and amalgamations have found their way in the banking sector.
Statistically, since 1961, there have been 81 amalgamations in the Indian banking sector of
which 47 had taken place before July 1969 i.e. before nationalization of banks. Out of the
34 remaining mergers, 26 mergers had occurred between private sector banks and public
sector banks and rest were between two private sector banks. However, ever since the
banking sector reforms, pursuant to the Narasimham Committee Report, in 1991, there have
been 31 mergers / amalgamations in the banking sector.
The only mergers that the nationalized banks have seen are that of the merger of the New
Bank of India with the Punjab National Bank in 1993 and the acquisition by State Bank of
India of State Bank of Saurashtra and State Bank of Indore in 2008 and 2010 respectively.
One of the most contentious mergers in the private banking space was the acquisition of
Bank of Madura by ICICI Bank Limited in March 2001. While the merger enabled ICICI to
expand its branches, it assumed several liabilities as Bank of Madura had very high nonperforming assets. On the other hand, for the economy, the burden of one weak bank had
reduced. Another important merger that resulted in many benefits to the merged entity was
the merger of HDFC Bank and Centurion Bank of Punjab in 2008. The resultant merged
entity inherited a huge asset base along with a wide network of branches. The other synergy
included sharing of the varied clientele of both the banks. The merger at hand which is
being promoted as one beneficial to both the banks, comes after a 5 year long break in
M&A activity in the banking sector. The last such merger was that of Bank of Rajasthan
with ICICI Bank in 2010.
of March 2014 was INR 6,578.51 million. The bank majorly deals in retail, private and
wholesale banking services. ING Vysya is also listed on the BSE and NSE.
In additions to the above, it appears that there were certain other driving forces for both
Parties to close this Deal, as described below:
A. ING Groups Exit from India
Though not officially announced by the Group, there have been numerous reports since
2013 of INGs intention to divest and exit India. ING which took a hit in the Global
recession was heavily indebted to the Dutch government. This was followed by the sale of
its INR 11 Billion stake in ING Vysya Life Insurance in late 2013, and more reports of
INGs plan to sell its stake in ING Vysya.
B. RBI Directive to Uday Kotak
In May 2014, Uday Kotak received a directive from RBI to reduce his shareholding in the
Bank to 20% (from 45.3% at that time) by December 2018. He was to reduce it to 30% by
December 2016.26 Pursuant to the Deal, the promoters stake in the Company will be
reduced to 33% putting him well on his way to meet the requirements of the directive.
4.
Deals can be conducted in cash or by exchange shares. The Kotak-ING Vysya deal will
purely an exchange of stocks. Investors in ING Vysya will get 725 Kotak Mahindra Bank
shares for every 1000 ING Vysya shares they held. This means, every Kotak share is worth
nearly 1.4 shares of ING Vysya. The deal values each share of ING Vysya at Rs 790, much
lower than its Thursday closing price of Rs 816.95. However, it is 16% more than the average
share price of the ING stock. This means, Kotak is paying slightly more than the market price
to buy the smaller bank. The entire deal would be valued at over Rs 15,000 crore or $2.4
billion, one of the largest ever.
Uday Kotak will remain to be the key promoter, holding around 34% stake in the merged
bank. This is down from 40%. As per shareholding rules, he has to reduce his stake further to
20% over the next four years. Dutch lender ING Groep NV will be the second largest
shareholder in the new Kotak Mahindra bank after the deal. It held nearly 43% stake in ING
Vysya. Its shareholding in the new entity would be nearly 25.3%, according to an Economic
Times report.
ING Vysya was valued about twice its FY15 estimated adjusted book value, lower than
expectations of 2.2 times. With Kotak Mahindra Bank trading at four times the FY15
estimated book, ING Vysya Bank's acquisition, at 2.2 times, will be highly EPS (earnings per
share)- and book-accretive; at these valuations, the deal will be seven-eight per cent 10 per
cent book-accretive. Past mergers and acquisitions in this sector such as the HDFC BankCenturian Bank of Punjab merger (2008) and the ICICI Bank-Bank of
Rajasthan merger (2010) took place at higher price/book value multiples of 2.4 and 5.4,
respectively.
b. Customer base: ING Vysya had a strong customer franchise for over 8 decades, with a
national branch network of 573 branches and deep presence in South India, particularly in
Andhra Pradesh, Telangana and Karnataka. ING had a large customer base across all
segments. The combined bank will have 1,214 branches, with a wide-spread pan-India
network, getting both breadth and depth given the strong geographic complementarities
between Kotak and ING Vysya.
c. Access to International business: In the past, ING Vysya has served a number of large
international corporates in India. The merged entity will leverage ING Groups international
expertise and presence.
d. Thrust to SME business: ING VYsya bank is particularly noted for the best-in-class SME
business. The banks lending spread across all sectors with a predominantly higher presence
in the Small Medium Enterprises (SME) sector. While Vysyas SME and business banking
segments accounted for 38% of its loan book, Kotak had a meagre 8% presence in this sector.
Vysyas customer base in this segment was very huge. The merger deal helped Kotak
diversify its book and increase its presence in the SME segment.
e. Deposits and advances: As on 30th Sep 2014, the advances and deposits of ING Vysya
bank were Rs. 39,558 crore and Rs. 44,652 crore respectively. The corresponding figures for
Kotak Mahindra bank were 81,418 crore and Rs. 66,311 crore. Current Accounts/ Savings
Accounts (CASA) were approximately 33% of INGs deposit base and about 29% of Kotaks.
The merged entity is expected to have a wider network.
f. Larger Savings Account Balances: While ING Vysyas current account float was very
healthy and Kotak offered a higher savings account interest rate of 5.5% to 6%, the merged
entity is expected to therefore garner larger savings account balances.
g. Capital Adequacy Ratio: The individual CAR for FY stood at 18.9% and 16.76% for FY
2014 and this ratio was expected to be 17.6% after the merger.
h. Saving on infrastructure overlapping: Kotak will have to spend a huge sum of money if
new branches are opened. The merger will bring in a great deal of savings in infrastructure
costs when new offices are established in southern regions of India.
This entailed that any shareholder of either Kotak or ING Vysya who did not approve of the
Deal, was entitled to tender his/her shares and receive from Kotak/ING Vysya, in cash, the
value (as determined by RBI) of such shares. Depending on the number of shares tendered
and bought back, the share capital of Kotak/ ING Vysya was reduced by the relevant amount.
Synergies in place
While Kotak has been able to diversify its loan portfolio over the years across retail, rural
and corporate segments the small enterprises (SME) segment constitutes a small portion of
its loan book. Given that ING Vysyas core strength lies in its high-yielding SME loan
portfolio, it has been a good fit for Kotak Mahindra Bank. From less than 10 per cent of
loans, SMEs now contribute about a fifth of Kotaks loan portfolio.
The merger has also helped Kotak expand its national footprint and compete better with
larger private players. The geographical presence of the two banks has complemented each
other well. The acquisition of ING Vysya, which has strong presence in two southern states,
has given Kotak a strong foothold in this market. Steady loan growth across product lines and
uptick in current and savings account (CASA) deposits as of December 2015, point to such
synergies in place.
The combined entity has a CASA ratio of 35 per cent, up from 32 per cent for Kotak
Mahindra Bank in the previous year. CASA deposits have accelerated both at Kotak and
erstwhile ING Vysya branches. Higher interest rate on savings account, along with focus on
customer acquisition, has helped increase average balances in accounts. Kotak Bank intends
to maintain the higher 6 per cent it offers on deposits of more than 1 lakh. This should
sustain the growth momentum in savings deposits.
Stressed assets
Despite stress in the overall banking system, Kotak has been able to maintain stable asset
quality gross non-performing assets (GNPAs) were flat at 2.3 per cent of loans
(standalone) sequentially. The banks restructured assets stood at 346 crore (0.3 per cent of
loans), marginally lower than in the previous quarter.
the media, and quoted a Kotak spokesperson who said that post-merger, Kotak would comply
with all requirements, including providing pension linked to dearness allowance
adjustments.30 Further, a letter from Kotak to ING Vysya clarifiying that Kotak would
honour all agreements between ING Vysya and the Unions relating to terms of employment,
wages, welfare measures, superannuation benefits, etc. was enclosed with the clarification.
However, Kotak, which otherwise has been ranked highly as an employer, is likely to have
the challenge of integrating the employees of ING Vysya. The management of Kotak has time
and again assured that there will be no drastic job or cost cuts in the near future.