Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2012
Current ratio
Acid-Test Ratio
1.12
.78
2011
Industry
1.17
.82
Average
1:54
1:82
2012
2011
Industry
Inventory
Gross
Turnover
Profit
Inventory
Receivable
8.34 times
9.10 times
10.11 times
Margin
24.8 %
22.4 %
33.55%
44 days
40 days
75.12 days
Turnover
17.73 times
15.8 times
10.11 times
Average
This is another area for concern. This so because over the course of the year 2012
its ability to pay long term debt worsen. In 2011 it already had a high Debt to Total Assets
ratio of 69 % compared to the industry average of 34 %. And on top of that it seems that
Amazon.com took on more debt thus risk. Its Debt to Total Assets ratio in 2012 was 75%
which is getting close to have almost all of its assets bought with debt according to this
ratio. Amazon.com is highly leverage and might find itself in financial difficulty when
facing a downturn. Another key indicator that Amazon.com ability to pay its long-term
debt deteriorated is the Time-Interest Earned ratio. This ratio measures the ability of a
company to pay interest and in 2011 it was 15.8 times, however in 2012 was 5.23 times
which is below the industry average of 5.33 times. Amazon.com needs to improve this
area immediately otherwise it may face financial difficulty long term.
Debt to Total
2012
2011
Industry Average
75%
69 %
34 %
5.23 times
15.8 times
5.33 times
Assets Ratio
Interest-Earned
Ratio
4
Profitability
Amazon.com profitability worsen year over year. Its Net Profit Margin in 2011
was 1.31 %, and in 2012 it was -.09%. During 2012 Amazon.com Profit Margin was
negative. It is already low compared to the industry average which is 2.87%, but then in
2012 it was even negative. Per Amazon.com growth strategy of razor thin profits is
expected however this is a negative number which is a cause for concern. Another key
indicator on profitability is Return on Common Stockholders Equity which was negative
for 2012. The industry average was 11.39 % and Amazon.com was -.49% in 2012. In
2011 it was already below industry average at 8.63 %. More information is needed to
create a better understanding of the erosion in profits for 2012.
2012
2011
Industry Average
Net Profit
-0.06 %
1.31 %
2.87 %
Margin
Return on
-o.49 %
8.63 %
11.39 %
Common
Stockholders
Equity
Evaluating stock as an investment.
For 2012 Amazon.com stock performed well. Its market price in 2011 was
$182.61, and it increased to $256.92 in 2012. Looking at this seems that Amazon.com is
creating value for its stockholders thru its long-term strategy. Even as Price/ Earnings
ratio was negative at -$2854.7 its stock price ended up higher in 2012 than 2011 which it
was $131.37. This can translate to investors thinking Amazon.com will continue to do
well for the future.
Book Value per
2012
$256.92
2011
$182.61
Industry Average
$10.54
Common Share
Price/ Earnings
-$2854.7
$131.37
$47.17
ratio
Conclusion
In conclusion, Amazon.com strategy of pursing long term growth and stability
seems to be working so far. Even as some of its key financial areas are not as strong such
as its ability to pay short term and long term liabilities, investors continue to reward the
company with higher and higher stock valuation. Amazon.com was not profitable in
2012, this should be a warning sign that better financial management is needed to
improve the financial health of the company. Another issue is for 2012 is that
Amazon.com borrowed and invested heavily compared to 2011. This could be the the
reason short term and longs term liability ratios deteriorated during this period. Overall,
this is a growing company that is creating value for its stockholders, however it must
improve on its ability to pay short term and long term liabilities to avoid financial
difficulties in the future.
Reflection paper
This paper clarified the key financial aspect of the performance of a company. In this
case, for Amazon.com I see that it is following its long-term strategy. This is to create value for
its stockholders thru the growth of the company and not thru short term gain and moods of Wall
Street. What I mean with this is that, Amazon.com invests its resources as it sees it will be best
long term, not short term. I also realized that following this strategy for Amazon.com a
downside. On several of its key financial areas Amazon.com is doing poorly. Perhaps a less
leverage financial position would be better, and increasing its cash reserves will help
Amazon.com be better prepare for the future. On the bright side, I learned that Amazon.com has
grown tremendously during the last two decades and is the leading online retailer. This
assignment will helped me be better prepare for my field of study because it is helping me better
understand finance, and financial terms.