Classaction Petition: Injunctive Relief

FjL~~D
15
IN THE DISTRICT COURT
JUL22 P 1 :41
of~k?'~OF""~~,~ON~j-y,
KANSAS
~~AWY~t1 ,-"vc";
I
By
CLASSACTION PETITION
FOR
INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
AGAINST THE FOLLOWING
DEFENDANT JUDGES;
LORI FLEMING, A. J. WACHTER, KURTIS LOY, ROBERT FLEMING, OLIVER LYNCH, JEFFRY JACK,
JANICE D. RUSSELL, RICHARD M. SMITH, JOHN E. SANDERS.
OTHER DEFENDANTS INCLUDE; KANSAS COMMISSION
ON JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS
PANEL
"A" AND "B", STANTON A. HAZLETT, MICHAEL GAYOSO, JR., TIM GRILLOT, AND KANSAS
ATTORNEY GENERAL DEREK SCHMIDT.
Case No.
K.S.A. Chapter
60
CLASS ACTION PETITION AGAINST CORPORATED AND

UNINCORPORATED
ASSOCIATIONS FOR INJUNCTIVE AND DECLARATORY
RELIEF ACCORDANCE WITH K.S.A. 60-223(a)(b)(c)(d)(e),
K.S.A. 60-223b.,
K.S.A. 60-257, AND K.S.A 60-901.

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
LIST OF PLAINTIFFS; ALL ATIACHED
GRAND JURY PETITIONERS
LIST OF DEFENDANTS;
JUDGE KURTIS I. LOY
JUDGE ANDREW J. WACHTER
JUDGE ROBERT J. FLEMING
JUDGE LORI B. FLEMING
JUDGE JEFFRY L. JACK
JUDGE OLIVER KENT LYNCH
JUDGE JANICE D. RUSSELL
JUDGE RICHARD M. SMITH

JUDGE JOHN E. SANDERS
KANSAS COMMISSION
ON JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS
STANTON A. HAZLEn
MICHAEL GAYOSO, JR.
TIM GRILLOT
KANSAS ATTORNEY GENERAL DEREK SCHMIDT
Page 1 of 15
Reasons that 'PANEL A' AND 'PANEL B' OF THE KANSASCOMMISSION ON JUDICIAL
QUALIFICATIONS need to be served as well as investigated are as follows:
Why send judges who have been complained on one type of letter advising the judge what
they need to correct or use caution on and send a completely different letter to the
complainant
like the Travis Carlton order in case number 2014CV7P? The panel also needs to
be investigated as to why they allowed Honorable Robert Fleming to be the Chair of the Kansas
Commisslcn on Judicial Qualifications when he himself was violating the rules of "THE KANSAS
COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS" by being a youth preacher and having his wife
collect money for the "PARISH". Judge Robert Fleming is also hearing his past law partners
cases while recusing himself from ethic complaints on Donald Noland by Kasey King, Michael
King, and Kolby King back on July 25 of 2003, recusing himself from Lester Moore's "DOCKETED"
complaint #1179 on March 11, 2013 on A.J. Wachter who was Fleming's former college
roommate, member of Our Lady of Lourdes Catholic Church, teammate at Colgan, and former
owner of "Wilbert, Towner, Lassman, Toburen, Fleming, and Wachter".
Judge Robert Fleming failed to recuse himself from complaints filed by Julie Stover against
Timothy Fielder on May 11, 2011 and he failed to recuse himself from complaints filed by Kasey
King and Julie Stover on March 11,2013 against Honorable Goering and Honorable J. Patrick
Walters where "Judge Walters was recused from the case" out of Wichita.
Kasey King, Julie
Stover, and Michael King all got Judge Fleming's former law partner, A.J. Wachter, reprimanded
with a "LETTEROF CAUTION" in docket number 1114, 1115, and 1116 for his inappropriate
use
of the term "peanut gallery" made on June 7, 2011 which was two years before the above
mentioned complaint.
Robert Fleming also should have never heard any complaint made by
"Kasey King or Michael King" because Kasey King played league and All-Star Baseball with
Michael Fleming who was coached by Michael King when he played 14 and 15 year old All Star
Baseball.
Judge Loy had previously recused himselffrom
involvement
case number 2011DM136P with Dustin Blair for
in All Star Baseball with his son Kris Loy when he was the coach and this
inconsistency with recusing under Rule 2.11(A) is why this investigation
is needed.
The wrongful acts of Crawford County District Court employees led to a class action lawsuit
filed by Kasey King, Michael King, Lester Moore, Julie Stover, Eric Muathe, and Noah Day in
Crawford County case number 13CV47P that was filed against Crawford County District Judges
including the relief judge, Honorable Senior Judge Janice Russell, for wrongful acts and omission
of employees.
Janice Russell also had a Writ of Mandamus filed against her in the State
Supreme Court in Appellate Case No. 12-108867-5 and since the attorney general's office in
Topeka chose to represent the above mentioned judges in court cases before where they were
sued civilly or perhaps had ouster complaints filed against their BONDS, chose to defend the
Page 2 of 15
above mentioned judges instead of prosecuting them and their insurance BONDS so that all
judges in the
n" judicial
district, including Janice Russell, Richard Smith and John Sanders,
would become "UN BONDABLE" by any insurance agent in the state of Kansas under K.S.A. 601205 and K.S.A. 60-1206(a)(b}.
The thing that disturbs the people in the 11thjudicial district is that the "KANSAS COMMISION
ON JUDICIAL QUALIFICIATIONS" does not even follow their own "Advisory Opinion
Annotations"
when it means they have to rule against their own religious members, family,
former law partners, and friends that should be disqualified from hearing a case for a conflict of
interest under Rule 2.11{A} of RULESRELATINGTO JUDICIAL CONDUCT.
Judge Robert Fleming's daughter-in-law,
Lori Bolton Fleming has already been "NOTED" on
December 13,2012 by the "KANSAS COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL QUALIFICATINES" for her

husband being the treasurer/campaign
manager for county attorney Michael Gayoso.
Somehow, Judge Lori Fleming thinks even after being noted by the committee
by testerMoore
after a complaint
in December 13, 2012, she is still hearing the cases of Mr. Gayoso.
Even
though they are members in the church band "Team Jesus", apparently there are no conflicts!
Lori Fleming also just recently got reprimanded with an informal letter of advice on February
23,2015 for the "appearance of practicing law" even though she is an 11th judicial district judge
because she was listed in the "NAMES AND NUMBERS 2013 and 2014 phone book" as an
attorney with the phone number of 620-231-1290.
This number conveniently
rings to her
former employer, Fred Spigarelli, and her husband Kyle Fleming of "Fleming's Law Firm" which
is housed inside the Spigarelli Law Firm!
Judge loy was reprimanded for the same thing on February 23, 2015 for having the
"appearance of a law firm" and for double dipping as "loy and Sagehorn" and still hearing their
cases and not recusing himself, even after complaints had been filed against him in case
number 2014LM55P and 2014LM409P where he heard the case of Burton Harding and Kip
Sagehorn and is still listed as the current judge.
There are numerous reasons why there should be an investigation into Panel A and Panel B of
the KANSASCOMMISSION ON JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS committee to see why these judges
are able to violate their own rules and still be a judge when they have obviously violated the
"oath of office" to be called 'Your Honor' when they have shown they have been "ANYTHING
AND EVERYTHINGEXCEPT HONORABLE" and have failed to follow Rule 1.1 of Rules Relating to
Judicial Conduct Compliance with the Law, which says "A judge shall comply with the law and
the Kansas Code of Judicial Conduct".
The Kansas Commission on Judicial Qualifications "Advisory Opinion Annotations"
which shows
obvious cases where Robert Fleming should have not allowed his son Kyle Fleming or his
Page 3 of 15
daughter-in-law
Lori Bolton Fleming to go in front of judges in the 11th judicial district along
with Candace Brewster Gayoso whose uncle and father are Daniel and David Brewster who
were former
ia" judicial
judges and had a financial CD with Robert Fleming according to his
financial disclosure report.

In 1984, JE-8 says "Appearance of attorney who is judge's daughter before other judges in
district. Canon 3C" How does this not relate to Lori Fleming, Kyle Fleming, and Candace
Brewster Gayoso as attorneys when they go, or went, in front of judges in the 11th judicial
district?
In 1984, JE-ll says "Attorney's
recommendation
advice to clients upon being appointed to the bench,
of spouse/attorney.
Canon 2 " How does this not relate to Lori Fleming
advertising in the phone book for her husband's law firm of "Fleming Law Firm" and Judge Loy
advertising for "Loy and Sagehorn"?
In 1984, JE-12 says "Appearance of firm members before former partner, now district judge,
who is also owner/landlord
of firm's office building and son of former partner who is retired
and receiving an annuity form the firm and whose name remains on firm letterhead. Canons 2B
and 3C." How does this not relate to Kurtis Loy who owned the office building of "Loy and
Sagehorn" and still owned 99% stock of Loy and Sagehorn and Kip Sagehorn and Burton
Harding go in front of him and still currently are according to the docket in case number
2014LM55P and 2014LM409P. Judge Loy's father also previously had stock at "Loy and
Sagehorn".
Where did Judge Loy's stock go?
In 1985, JE-13 says "Attendance of judge's spouse at political gatherings; political contributions
by judge's spouse form spouse's business income maintained in separate account." How does
this not relate to Lori Fleming's husband Kyle Fleming being Michael Gayoso's campaign
manager and Lori Fleming and Kyle Fleming donating money to Michael Gayoso's campaign?
The Lester Moore Complaint in December 13, 2012 should have been a reprimand resulting in a
letter of caution, informal advice with a "PRIVATE CEASEAND DESIST"from Lori Fleming ever
being able to hear Michael Gayoso's cases.
In 1987, JE-19 says "Involvement
of judge in cases handled by judge's former law firm'; effect of
"blind trust" set up by judge to administer proceeds due him upon his leaving practice. Canon
2; 3C(1}, (2), and (3); and 3D. All the judges in the judicial district heard their law partners'
cases within 5 years after becoming a judge, especially Judge Oliver Lynch, Jeffry Jack, and
Kurtis Loy. So, how does this not pertain to the judges in the 11th district?
Kurtis Loy is still
hearing cases of Burton Harding and Kip Sagehorn, according to dockets on 4-28-2015 in
2014LM55P and 2014LM409P.
April 28, 2015 was just last month!
Page4 of 15
In 1987, JE-21 says "Property of newly-appointed
district judge remaining as co-trustee of
former clients' revocable trust. Canon SD How does this not pertain to Judge Kurtis Loy owning
99% of his stock at Loy and Sagehorn and owning the building at 112 W. 4th in Pittsburg Kansas?
The "ORDER" in case number 2014CV7P from August 2014 in the complaint filed by Travis
Carlton against Kurtis Loy where "the information
was for his eyes only but Chief Judge
Wachter filed it publicly" clearly should have been a reprimand with a letter of caution,
informal advice with a "Private Cease and Desist" to leave the case because of
s" amendment
right of Due Process Of Law.

In 1988, JE-2S says "Judicial candidates' continuation
How does this not relate to Robert Fleming the
as weekend pastor". 'Canon SA and SB(2).
ri" judicial
district judge and chair for
numerous years of the "KANSAS COMMISION ON JUDICIAL QUALIFICATION"? How, to this day,
is Robert Fleming, Kyle Fleming, and his wife Peggy Fleming still youth ministers and Judge Lori
Fleming a "lecturer"
at Our Lady of Lourdes Catholic Church and it does not violate JE-2S???
In 1988, JE-26 Recusal due to relationship disqualification
under Canon 3C(1)(d)(iv); procedure
for remittal of such relationship under Canon 3D? Why are 11th district judges, and retired
senior Judges Janice Russell, Richard Smith and John Sanders not all clear on "when to recuse
and when not to"?
In 1992, JE-37 says "Judge's spouse as campaign manager in partisan county-wide
election".
How does this not relate to attorney Kyle Fleming being Michael Gayoso's campaign manager
when his wife Lori Fleming is a judge? Lester Moore's complaint on December 13,2012 that
was "NOTED" by committee
should have been a reprimand.
In 1992, JE-38 states, "Judge as member of Kansas Commission on Governmental
Standards and
Conduct. Kan. Const., art. 3 Section 13." How does this not relate to previous Ethic Chair Judge
Robert Fleming?
In 1993, JE-42 says "Judge presiding at docket call wherein son or son's law firm represents a
party."
Canon 3C(1)(d)(i), (ii), (iii). How does this not relate to Judge Robert Fleming with Kyle
Fleming and Lori Fleming as attorneys before him and Candace Brewster Gayoso in front of
Daniel or David Brewster and Kurtis Loy in front of his father Kurtis Loy for numerous years?
\
In 1994, JE-47 says "Judge as member of non-profit corporation
board of directors. Canon SB."
How does this not relate to Oliver Lynch ofthe Kansas Arts Board? And this also should relate
to Kurtis Loy of liTHE STILLWELLFOUNDATION" where Kurtis Loy received over $200,000.00 of
forgivable loans from the City of Pittsburg economic committee where his former law partner,
Mark A. Werner, and attorney Kyle Fleming, spouse of Judge Lori Fleming, and son of
Honorable Robert Fleming, are the two attorney/committee
Page5 of 15
members who agreed on the
request from Kurtis Loy and gave the "FREE" money? How is this not a demonstrated
conflict of
interest?
In 1994, JE-49 says "Part-time city attorney serving as part-time municipal judge for a different
city". How does this not relate to Pittsburg city prosecutor and city judge in Cherokee County,
John Mazurek? The complaints of Jim Willard filed in February of 2015 that were dismissed by
Stanton Hazlett and The Kansas Commission on Judicial Qualifications.
In 1997, JE-72 says "Municipal judge who is also assistant county attorney may serve as
prosecutor under certain conditions."
How did John Mazurek get away with being a municipal
judge in Cherokee County and was the assistant county attorney under Michael Gayoso for
years? Is it because Michael Gayoso's wife is Candace-Brewster Gayoso and had ties to 11th
judicial former judges, Daniel and David Brewster? The complaint of Jim Wi'liard on February of
2015 should have been a reprimand.
In 1997, JE-77 says "Judge may serve as elder of church as long as judge does not solicit funds.
Canon 4C(4)(b)."
How does this not relate to Judge Robert Fleming when his wife Peggy
collects money for the "PARISH" at Our Lady Of Lourdes Catholic Church where he, their son
Kyle, and Peggy are youth ministers? The complaint filed by Eric Muathe back in December of
2014 to February of 2015 against Robert Fleming for his ties to Our Lady of Lourdes Catholic
Church should have been a reprimand.
In 1988, JE-81 says "Judge should not purchase property from an estate pending in the judge's
court even though the transaction was at arm's length and in good faith. Canons 1, 2A, 4A(1)
and 4D(1). How does this not relate to Judge Loy and Judge Gariglietti whose wives are realtors
in this county?
In 1988, JE-84 says "Judge may serve on a land purchase committee for his church if he will do
no legal work or fund raising."
How does this not relate to Robert Fleming because the Catholic
Diocese of Wichita, which is over all the Catholic churches in this area, previously owned
"Crawford County Judicial Center" at 602 N. Locust, Pittsburg, Kansas! Robert Fleming's wife
collects money for the "PARISH" and has a retirement account from the Catholic Diocese
according to his financial disclosure reports since she was a teacher at ST. Mary's Colgan, which
is the private Catholic school in Pittsburg, Kansas.
In 2000, JE-95 says "Judge must cease all participation
building. Canon 4D(1)(6)."
in ownership interest in a law firm
How does this not relate to Judge Kurtis Loy still hearing Kip
Sagehorn's cases when Judge Loy owns the building

to still make judicial determinations
of
the law firm? How was Judge Loy able
and stay in case number 2014CV7P when Travis Carlton
made a complaint for this and Mr. Carlton got one letter saying it was dismissed and Judge Loy
got another letter telling him to get his financial affairs in order? Why was there at least not a
Page6 of 15
letter of caution for this???? How can a judge stay in a case after a complaint makes them
change their Articles of Incorporation
and the judge not be biased?
In 2001, JE-102 says" District magistrate judge may release log or written record of all closed
cases to the media as long as the judge does not comment on pending cases. Canon 3B(9)"
Why does Janice Russell comment on pending cases of Eric Muathe to other attorneys against
him???
In 2003, JE-112 says "Judges may volunteer to cook and serve meals at a community
soup
kitchen sponsored by a local church and open to the public daily. Canon 4C(4)" How does this
not apply to Robert Fleming since Our Lady of Lourdes is a private church and not a public one
and he and his wife are always volunteering/raising
money for Our Lady of Lourdes
"PARISH"?!!!! !
In 2005, JE-126 says "Judges should not attend or participate in a conference sponsored or
presented by a law enforcement
agency which would in effect train judges to consider these
matters in future cases. See JE-121. Canon 2A and Canon 3B(7)" How does this not relate to
Judge Lori Fleming since she sits drinking wine with Crawford County Deputy Stu Hite and his
wife Amy as Stu Hite himself explains law enforcement techniques to her husband, attorney
Kyle Fleming as Mr. Fleming drinks wine himself in the picture at Crestwood County Club which
is "PRIVATE"!!!
How can Lori Fleming hear cases that involve Stuart Hite as the arresting
officer, which she does when he is a youth minister at her church, private member at
Crestwood, and good family friend?
In 2005, JE-130 says "An adverse ruling, standing alone, is not grounds for disqualification
judge who is being sued by a pro se counterclaimant.
of a
Canon 3E" How does this not relate to the
class action lawsuit in case number 13CV47P that involves Janice Russell? Just because she was
sued alone does not require disqualification,
but this ruling disagrees with her ruling when a
judge should recuse or not recuse.

In 2005, JE-131 says "A judge may attend an open house sponsored by a law firm; however, a
judge should not accept a golf and poker invitation from a law firm since it would create a
perception of impropriety
due to the expense. Canon 2. How does this not relate to Judge
Robert Fleming, Lori Fleming, Kurtis Loy, A.J. Wachter, and deceased Chief Judge John
Gariglietti all playing Golf together at Crestwood and paying membership fees? How does this
not apply to Stanton Hazlett's Golf Charity with attorneys where they get credits for attending
his workshop?
This is why Stanton Hazlett should not be able to investigate any complaint
against an attorney due to his economic conflicts of interest.

In 2005, JE-135 says "A judge may bid for land at a public auction arising out of foreclosure
action if the judge has nothing to do with the foreclosure action, since it would not exploit his
Page7 of 15
position or give an appearance of impropriety.
Canon 4D{1} and Canon 2A." How does this not
have to do with Judge Kurtis Loy's wife Cindy Loy being a realtor and deceased John Gariglietti's
wife Eunice Gariglietti being a realtor as well??? Judge Loy's wife Cindy Loy and Judge
Garigliettie's wife Eunice went in on all the property for the new Crestwood Estates Edition out
by the private "Crestwood Country Club" which they are all members.
Cindy Loy and Eunice
Gariglietti are the first to hear of any foreclosures when it becomes property for sale. Seems
like that is a huge impropriety.
In 2007, JE-151 says "A district judge participating as a player and/or auctioneer in his or her
country club's fundraising member guest tournament
prohibits fundraising.
clearly violates Canon 4C(4}(b} which
How does this not relate to Judge Loy, Judge Robert Fleming, Judge Lori
Fleming, former deceased judge John Gariglietti, and Judge A.J. Wachter when they play golf at
"Crestwood Country Club"? They are all participating in the fund raisers that happen
throughout
the year. When a fundraising event happens at the country club, you can count on
any, if not all, of these to attend. There are pictures to prove it.
In 2009, JE-167 says "A judge is required to disqualify himself or herself in any proceeding in
which the partner of the judge's spouse represents a party before the judge. See Canon, 2,
Rule 2.11(A} and Canon 1, Rule 1.2. How does this not relate to Robert Fleming when he was
hearing cases of J. Gordon Gregory from "Wilbert and Towner" as his son and daughter-in-law
worked for Wilbert and Towner and Spigarelli Law Firm where he accepted both assignments
from those law firms. This should also apply to Oliver Lynch when he heard cases of Candace
Gayoso when Michael Gayoso was still paying Oliver Lynch money from the buyout of his law
firm.
And last but not least, how does 2011 JE-l71 not affect Judge Kurtis Loy who according to the
dockets in case number 2014LM55P on 4/28/2015 and 2014LM409P still show Kurtis Loy as the
current judge when the attorneys are Burton Harding and Kip Sagehorn of "Loy and Sagehorn"
even after a complaint was filed with Stanton Hazlett on this matter and Mr. Hazlett said "he's
sure Judge Loy will take care of this once he learns of it". That was in November of 2014 and it
is now 4/28/ 2015 and yet the docket in case number 2014LM55P shows on 2/13/2015 that a
garnishment order was signed by Judge Loy. The opinion of JE-171 in 2011 says itA judge and
his or her spouse who owns an office building may lease the building to attorneys or law firms
who practice and appear in the judge's district as long as the attorneys appear before other
judges in the district and the conflicts appear only periodically. See Rules 1.2, 2.1, 2.11, 3.11.
Since the "KANSAS COMMISISON ON JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS" has failed to be consistent
with their handling of ethic complaints and since they claim they have no jurisdiction
recuse/disqualify
a judge yet Rule 2.11{A} requires Disqualification
to
under their rules and they
have the power to issue a "CEASEAND DESISTORDERPUBLIC OR PRIVATE" and this is confusing
Page8 of 15
and that is why the KANSASCOMMISSION ON JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS needs to be

investigated as well. It also is very disturbing that Robert Fleming has violated several examples
of advisory annotation opinions of the Kansas Commission on Judicial Qualifications yet he was
still able to be their Chair person for the ethic committee for numerous years.
The above mentioned examples of advisory case annotations that were not followed by "THE
KANSASCOMMISSION ON JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS Panel A, Panel B", Stanton Hazlett
Disciplinary Administrator,
Michael Gayoso County Attorney's Office, and Stephen Phillips
Attorney General's Office, Timothy Grillot which have now led to the claim against them for
injunctive relief from negligent and wrongful acts and omissions of employees by failing to carry
out their ministerial tasks which are the following:
STATEMENT OF FACTS
1. Stanton Hazlett refusing to give complaints filed against himself to The Disciplinary Oversight
Committee or to any other body and chooses to basically ignore complaints against himself.
2. Kansas Commission on Judicial Qualifications failing to follow their own advisory opinions
and failing to properly investigate case number 2014CV7P and 2014CCV53PA and failing to give
Honorable Loy a Private Cease and Desist Order even though the "ORDER" filed by Judge
Wachter in August 2014 in this case shows that a violation of Advisory opinion of 2011 JE-171
and yet no reprimand was done.
3. Stanton Hazlett failed to address attorney/Judge
Kurtis Loy for hearing case number
2014LM55P which is the case of his past law partner Kip Sagehorn. Mr. Hazlett stated that he
was sure Judge Lay will take care of this once he learns of it, but the court docket of 4-28-2015
shows he is still violating the Advisory Opinion of 2011 JE-171 since Stanton Hazlett and The
Kansas Commission on Judicial Qualifications failed to properly carry out this investigation
which led to a wrongful act of Stanton Hazlett, Panel A and Panel B, by failing to properly
reprimand Judge Loy.
4. Kansas Commission on Judicial Qualifications failed to reprimand Robert Fleming for a
violation of 1988 JE-25 and 1997 JE-77 for his involvement as a youth preacher at Our Lady of
Lourdes Catholic Church, yet his wife collects money for the "PARISH". They have also failed to
reprimand Robert Fleming for recusing from Kasey King and Michael King's ethic complaints
back in July 25, 2003, but yet failed to recuse from Kasey King's complaint against Honorable
Goering and Honorable Walters in Wichita on March 13, 2011 after Kasey King, Michael King,
and Julie Stover all got Robert Fleming's former law partner and former college roommate, A.J.
Wacther, reprimanded
recuse himselffrom
city/pro-tempore
with a letter of caution on June 7, 2011. Robert Fleming also failed to
Julie Stover's May 11, 2011 complaint against Timothy Fielder who was a
judge in the
rr"
judicial district and Judge Robert Fleming should have

Page9 of 15
recused from that complaint like he did with complaints against Honorable Donald Noland and
Honorable A.J. Wachter.
This inconsistency with Rule 2.11{A} and K.S.A. 20-311d has led to the
people of the i i" judicial district not receiving due process of law from the previous ethic chair
person himself.
5. Kansas Commission on Judicial Qualifications has failed to reprimand Lori Fleming and
Michael Gayoso for allowing Michael Gayoso to practice law in front of Judge Lori Fleming when
her husband was Mr. Gayoso's campaign manager and her church band partner in "TEAM
JESUS"which is an obvious violation of Rule 2.11(A).
6. The Kansas Commission on Judicial Qualifications failed to reprimand Oliver Lynch, Kurtis
Loy, and Jeffry Jack for a violation of 1987 JE-19 even though they heard numerous cases of
their former law partners within a 5 year window.
7. Michael Gayoso is being served for failing to follow "Kansas Rules of Professional Conduct"
Rule 1.7 Conflict of Interest by failing to recuse himself from cases that involve attorneys he has
previously worked with and for litigating cases in front of judges that he is friends and private
members of Our Lady Of Lourdes Catholic Church. He has also failed to investigate complaints
under K.S.A. 60-1206(a) that were filed against Judge A.J. Wachter because he is a member of
the same church as Judge A.J. Wachter.
8. Attorney General's Office and Derek Schmidt are being served for failing to follow KRPCRule
1.7 as well since he has previously represented
ri" judicial
judges as clients then went in front
ofthe same judge later on to represent another client. He has also failed to investigate
complaints filed against 11thjudicial judges under K.S.A. 60-1206(a)(b) and that is why he needs
investigated as well for committing
a negligent act by failing to conduct a thorough
investigation.
9. Stanton Hazlett has allowed Timothy Grillot in case numbers 2014CV7P and 2014CV53P to
investigate the complaint on Judge Timothy Fielder even though the complaint has to do with
Robert Fleming signing an Ex-Parte Order with Timothy Fielder and Timothy Grillot and Robert
Fleming were co-defendants
in case number 12-3177-SAC Ozell Pouncil vs. Labette County
District Court et aI., Robert Fleming, Timothy Grillot and both are members of the Catholic
Church and have known each other for years and this is a violation of KRPCRule 1.7 Conflict of
Interest as a neutral unbiased investigator should have been assigned to investigate these
cases. Stanton Hazlett has also failed to recuse/disqualify
attorneys that receive credits at his golftournaments
himself from investigating cases of
which is a violation of 2005 JE-131 and
2007 JE-1S1.
10. Janice Russell has failed to honor the ministerial task of following Rule 2.11(A) of Rules
Relating to Judicial Conduct and K.S.A. 20-311d as she stated that basically Oliver Lynch's
Page10 of 15
disqualification
of A.J. Wachter in case number 2012LM356P was wrong since A.J. Wachter and
a pro se litigant are not related and Judge A.J. Wachter was still ORDEREDout of that case.
11. Robert Fleming recently recused from case number 2012LM356P as well on May 20, 2015
just one day after a grand jury petition was filed in case number 2015MR2P and Robert Fleming
and myself are not related as well and this would contradict Janice Russell's judicial
determination
that a judge should only recuse ifthe family is related. Janice Russell has shown
biased and prejudiced against "Pro Se" litigants and therefore an "injunctive
relief" is needed
against Janice Russell.

12. John Sanders has failed to honor the ministerial task of following the
amendment ofthe
United States Constitution
s"
by failing to give due process in case number
201414CV57P "Petition For Relief In The Form Of Quo Warranto"

prejudice" which was later overturned
ia"
,
and
and dismissed "without
by dismissing the case "with
prejudice".
John Sanders has
shown that he is biased and prejudiced against "Pro Se" litigants and therefore
an "injunctive
relief" is needed against John Sanders.

13. Timothy Grillot failed to follow the ministerial task of KRPCRule 1.7 Conflict of Interest and
has failed to disqualify himself from the investigation of "In The Matter of Timothy Fielder"
DA12, 181 "which has been going on since October 31, 2014" in case numbers 2014CV7P and
2014CV53PA where the judges are Kurtis Loy and Robert Fleming. Timothy Grillot was a codefendant in case number 12-3177-SAC Ozell Pouncil vs. Labette County District Court et aI.,
Robert Fleming, Timothy Grillot. Timothy Grillot is biased and prejudiced for Robert Fleming
who has been complained on several times by Mr. Carlton in case number 2014CV53PA for
signing an Ex-Parte Order when the attorney was Timothy Fielder who is a pro-tempore/
city
judge in Crawford County 11th judicial district which should have been a conflict of interest
under Rule 2.11{A} of Rules Relating To Judicial Conduct. Injunctive relief is needed against
Attorney/Office
Of Disciplinary Administrator
investigator Timothy Grillot so that an unbiased
out of 11th district attorney can complete the investigation of "DA12, 181 In The Matter of
Timothy Fielder".
14. Judge Richard M. Smith should have lacked subject-matter
jurisdiction
to hear case number
2015MR2P for failing to follow Supreme Court rule 6018 Relating To Judicial Conduct Canon 3.
Rule 3.15{8} {2013 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 748} because he did not file his "Judicial Financial
Disclosure Report" for 2013 until May 13, 2014 and he did not fill out his 2014 "Judicial
Financial Disclosure Report" until May 19, 2015 which both violates Rule 3.15{8} of Rules
Relating To Judicial conduct.
According to Canon 3 Rule 3.15{B} a judge is supposed to have his
financial disclosure report filled out by April 15 of every calendar year and his failure to file his
2013 and 2014 financial disclosure reports on time is a violation of The Code of Judicial
Conduct. Rule 3.15{B} says "A judge shall report annually the information
Page 11 of 15
listed above in {A)(1}
through (7) on a form provided by the Commission on Judicial Qualifications.
The judge's
report for the preceding calendar year shall be filed as public document in the office of the
Clerk of the Appellate courts on or before April 15 of each year. (Exhibit A) (Exhibit B) 2013 and
2014 calendar year financial disclosure report.
All of the above 14 claims have been a result of failing to perform their ministerial acts of
properly investigating and preceding over cases without conflicts of interest.
An example of a
ministerial act is the clerk of the court's duty to report drivers to the DHSMV under Section
3.1815(1)(a) is a ministerial
act that is not entitled to any form of judicial immunity in case
number16-203-CA-005890.
'The clerk, an officer ofthe court, is obliged to comply with rules of
procedure governing his duties. ilWhen delinquent

appropriate
or derelict in such performance,
legal measures are available to enforce compliance, as well as to secure redress
by way of damages incurred as a result of his failure to perform those duties."

Fountain,
Ward v.
st
122 So. 2d 209, 210 (Fla. 1 DCA 1960) (emphasis added).
ARGUMENT
1. Kansas Commission on Judicial Qualifications conduct in reprimanding judges for violations
of Rules Relating To Judicial Conduct is a Ministerial Act, not a Judicial Act for Which Immunity
is Available.
2. Stanton Hazlett's conduct in reprimanding
attorneys for violations of Kansas Rules of
Professional Conduct is a Ministerial Act, not a Judicial Act for Which Immunity is Available.
3. Michael Gayoso's conduct in failing to disqualify himself form cases that are a conflict of
interest is a Ministerial Act, not a Judicial Act for Which Immunity is Available.
4. Stephen Phillips conduct in failing to reprimand 11thjudicial judges for violations from ouster
quo warranto complaints filed under K.S.A. 60-1206(a) is a Ministerial Act, not a Judicial Act for
Which Immunity is Available.
5. Timothy Grillot's conduct in failing to disqualify himself from a complaint that had to do with
an Ex-Parte violation of Rule 2.9 between Robert Fleming and Timothy Fielder of Rules Relating
To Judicial Conduct and failed to reprimand attorney Timothy Fielder in docket number
DA12,181In the Matter of Timothy L. Fielder.
6. The same case of Cook v. City of Topeka, 654 P. 2d 953 was used to show that clerk of the
courts are not subject to the doctrine of judicial immunity.
involves a determination
At its core, the court's analysis
as to whether the clerk was engaged in a judicial, quasi-judicial, or
Page12 of 15
ministerial task. See id. At 957. Ifthe complained of actions of the clerk are ministerial, judicial
immunity does not apply. See id. At 958.
7. Failing to disqualify from an investigation under KRPCRule 1.7 Conflict of Interest is a
Ministerial Act, not a Judicial Act for Which Immunity is Available.
8. Janice Russell has a ministerial duty under K.S.A. 20-311d and Rule 2.11(A} to recuse herself
from cases where there is an appearance of not being able to be impartial and she has failed to
do so and this is a Ministerial Act, not a Judicial Act for Which Immunity is Available. Judge
Russell has a ministerial duty to not take any further action in any cases she had already been
recused as seen by her deliberate decision to sign orders in Crawford County District Court
cases number 2012-LM356-P and 2014-CV-28-P AFTERshe had been recused.
9. John Sanders has a ministerial duty to follow the due process clause of the 14th and
s"
amendment which he has failed to do and this is a Ministerial Act, not a Judicial Act for Which
Immunity is Available.
10. It seems to be a violation of The Code Of Judicial Conduct according to Judicial Ethic
Advisory Opinion 1997 JE-77 which says "Judge may serve as elder of church as long as judge
does not solicit funds. Canon 4C(4}(b}."
How does this not relate to Judge Richard Smith filing
on May 13, 2014 on his financial disclosure report that he is with the
"business/organization/entity
"Trustee".
as Mound City Christian Church where he holds the position as
The first time he mentions this position with the church is on his calendar year 2012
financial disclosure report that he filed on time on April 8, 2013 and mentions the position as
"Trustee" which is a violation because he collects funds for the church. This should violate Rule
3.12 Compensation for Extrajudicial Activities and it should also violate Rule 3.14
Reimbursement of Expenses and Waivers of Fees or Charges COMMENT(1} where religious and
charitable organizations are mentioned.
Since he failed to mention his position as trustee on
the 2014 financial disclosure he might have failed to properly show expenses since he did not
file these on time by April 15, 2015 which was tax day. This also violates Rule
3.15(A}(1}(2}(3}(5}(6}(B}
Reporting Requirements and JE Opinion 1997 JE-73 says "Judge may
not serve as trustee for community organization which aims to improve qualify of life for
children and youth. Canon 4(A}(1), 4C(4}. (Exhibit C} and (Exhibit D) JE 73 and JE 77 opinion
10. All ofthe Defendants being served in this case including all six (6) of the
n" judicial
district
judges are being served for failing to perform Ministerial Acts, not a Judicial Act for Which
Immunity is available and therefore
"Injunctive Relief" is demanded by all of the people who
signed the petition under K.S.A. 60-1206 to have the
n" judicial
and ousted for failing to honor Rule 2.11(A} and K.S.A. 20-311d.
Page 13 of 15
district judges investigated
One test used to determine whether a clerk of a court is engaged in a judicial, quasi-judicial or
ministerial task is to see if a statute imposes a duty upon the clerk to act in a certain way
leaving the clerk no discretion.
In Am.Jur.2d it is stated while "there is some conflict as to the
judicial or ministerial nature of certain specific duties of a clerk of a court; ... his duty is purely
ministerial when it is prescribed by statute."
15A Am.Jur.2d, Clerks Of Court Section 21, p. 156
sernphasls supplied}.
The case of Cook v. City of Topeka, 654 P. 2d 953 (Kan. 1982), the Supreme Court of Kansas
should also be used for attorneys Michael Gayoso, Stephen Phillips, Stanton Hazlett, and
Timothy Grillot for failing to fulfill their ministerial duties of properly investigating cases and
Panel A and Panel B for failing to allow the "Disciplinary Administrator
Oversight Committee"
to
investigate complaints on Robert Fleming who was their previous chair and failing to report
other attorneys and judges for misconduct under KRPC8.3(a)(b} and Rule. 2.15(A)(B)(C)(D}
Responding to Judicial and Lawyer Misconduct.
The same case should be used for Panel A and
Panel B of KANSASCOMMISSION ON JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS for failing to follow Rule 1.1

Compliance with Law, Rule 2.11(A} Disqualification,
and Rule 2.15(A)(B)(C)(D}.
The case of Cook v. City of Topeka, 654 P.2d 953, 957 (Kan. 1982) says "A clerk may not escape
liability for illegal or improper performance of a ministerial task imposed by statute. Id. At 958.
The court went on to explain that the "quasi-judicial exception is applicable to discretionary
duties of a judicial nature."
Since Panel A, Panel B, Michael Gayoso, Stephen Phillips, Stanton
Hazlett, and Timothy Grillot were not making judicial determinations
of a judicial nature and
they all failed to properly carry out their ministerial tasks then no judicial immunity should
apply to any officer of the court when this happens and Petitioners are filing this verified
pleading in accordance with K.S.A. 60-901 and would like to have an "ORDER" of an
"INJUNCTION" under K.S.A. 60-901 against Michael Gayoso, Stephen Phillips, Stanton Hazlett,
Timothy Grillot, Panel A, Panel B, and all i i" judicial district judges to not be able to hear
anyone's case who signed the "GRAND JURY PETITION" due to conflict of interest under Rule
2.11(A} and K.S.A. 20-311d.
Petitioners are filing this case like the civil rights case of Monroe v. Pope. In Monroe, the
Supreme Court held that a police officer was acting "under color of state law" even though his
actions violated state law. This was the first case in which the Supreme Court allowed liability
to attach where a government
official acted outside the scope of the authority granted to him
by state law. The element of this claim is that only "persons" under the statute are subject to
liability.
A state is not a person subject to the suit but a state officer can be sued in his official
capacity for prospective or injunctive relief despite the fact that a suit against a government
official in his official capacity represents nothing more than a suit against the government
entity
itself. According to this a state may not be sued for damages, but may be sued for declaratory
Page14 of 15
or injunctive
relief.
Municipalities
and local governments are persons subject to suit for
damages and prospective relief, but the United States Government is not. Individual
employees of federal, state, and local government
for damages, declaratory
or injunctive
may be sued in their individual
capacities
relief.
,
PRAYERFOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff class requests this Court to:
{1} Declare, by way of permanent injunction, that the defendants be ordered to disqualify
themselves from cases/complaints
where their impartiality
The standard to be applied to a charge of lack of impartiality
might reasonably be questioned.

is whether the charge IS grounded
in facts that would create reasonable doubt concerning the Court's impartiality,
not in the mind
of the Court itself, or even necessarily in the mind of the litigant filing the motion, but rather in
the mind of a reasonable person with knowledge of the circumstances. Smith v. Printup, 262
Kan. 587, 1997, at Syl. 8:
(2) Declare that pending, and new ethical complaints filled by the petitioners
be investigated by
independent oversight committees.

{3} Declare a thorough independent
review of all past ethical complaints filled by the
petitioners to ascertain that all complaints were properly investigated and that appropriate
reprimands were instituted.
{4} Grant Plaintiff class such other relief as may be just and equitable.
Dated July 22, 2015

Respectfully Submitted by;
By: Is/Eric M. Muathe Eric Muathe, P. O. Box 224, Pittsburg, KS,66762.
By: Is/Noah Day Noah Day, P. O. Box 224, Pittsburg, KS,66762.
By: Is/Kasey King Kasey King, P. O. Box 224, Pittsburg, KS,66762.
By: Is/James Beckley Jr. James Beckley Jr., P. O. Box 224 Pittsburg, KS,66762.
By: Is/Travis Carlton Travis Carlton, P. O. Box 224, Pittsburg, KS,66762.
Page 15 of 15
GRAND JURY PETITION* TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF CRAWFORD COUNTY, KANSAS

The undersigned
qualified electors of the County of Crawford and State of Kansas hereby request that the District Court of Crawford County, within 60 days after the filing of this
Petition cause a grand jury to be summoned in the County to investigate alleged violations of law and to perform such other duties as may be authorized by law:
1. Hear testimony and investigate alleged violations of Federal and Kansas DUE PROCESS constitutional law by the systematic and blatant usurpation of judicial office and
the disturbing conflicts of interest between Judges" and attorneys (esp. their former law partners)
including instances of confirmed I shocking eConomic conflict of interests.
The reasonable people of this County have decided that there needs to be an immediate stop to this practice by the implementation
of a new 11 th District local rule that bars all
Judges from hearing their former law partners cases. The people have NO CONFIDENCE
in the judiciary when judges act at times in a mariner that does NOT promote public
confidence in the independence,
integrity, and impartiality of the judiciary and believe it is inappropriate for a Judge to hear cases with open Ihidden conflicts of interests.
2. Guilty judges I parties attorneys should be indicted, ousted out of office, moneys earned returned and all related NO DUE PROCESS cases voided, vacated, and reheard.
ttomeys
Who knowingly
practiced
law in front of a judge with a conflict of interest should face disciplinary
Print
~~~::::....~~~~:J"",,,,oa
each signer
on this petition
believes that the statements
Address
Name
--,
that each of the signers
action and restitution
have signed above
is the genuine
in this petition
signature
of client and state income for every such case.
Email Address (Optional)
City/Zip
as the carrier
of this petition
of the person
whose
and do verify
name it purports
upon the
to be and that
Return
Petitions
Summary
c/o Noah.Day
are true.
P.O.Box
Page ~
of ~
**A.J. WACHTER,
WE'rHE
"Pursuant to K.S.A 22~3001 (e) and K.S.A. 60-1206(a)

KURTIS LOY, OLIVER LYNCH, JEFFRY JACK, ROBERT FLEMING,
Pittsburg,
& LORI B. FLEMING
PEOPLE BEUEVETHATTO
AVOID BlAS AND PREJUDICEFUOM
THE JU DI ClARY ALL PETITIONERS
SHOULD AUTOMATlCALLY
D1SQUAUFY ALL THE NAMED JUDGES.
To:
JudgmentGroup
& Eric Muathe
224
Kansas, 66762
For Questions Call: (417) 434-0083

www.ConflictGate.com

The undersigned quali led electors of the County of Crawford and state of Kansas hereby request that the District Court of Crawford County, within 60 days after the filing of this
Petition cause a grand r,ry to be summoned in the County to investigate alleged violations of law and to perform such other duties as may be authorized by law:
1Hear testimony and i vestigate alleged violations of Federal and Kansas DUE PROCESS constitutional law by the systematic and blatant usurpation of judicial office and
the disturbing conflicts f interest between Judges" and attorneys (esp. their former law partners) including instances of confirmed I shocking economic conflict of interests.
The reasonable people of this County have decided that there needs to be an immediate stop to this practice by the implementation of a new 11th District local rule that bars all
Judges from hearing their former law partners cases. The people have NO CONFIDENCE in the judiciary when judges act at times in a manner that does NOT promote public
confidence in the independence, integrity, and impartiality of the judiciary and believe it is inappropriate for a Judge to hear cases with open Ihidden conflicts of interests.
~ Guilty judges I partie~ attorneys should be indicted, ousted out of office, moneys earned returned and all related NO DUE PROCESS cases voided, vacated, and reheard.
ttorneys who knowing y practiced law in front of a judge with a conflict of interest should face disciplinary action and restitution of client and state income for every such case.
Address
2oSW.Lt:.\
.t..lZ7
R.e!dcYe.s
Email Address
I,
have signed above as the carrier of this petition and do verify upon the
oath that each of the igner

this petition is the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be and that
each signer believes t at the statements in this petition are true.
r'
Page:J......
of ~
**A.J. WACHTE~,
I_P_itt~sb_u_r=g,~K_a_n_sa_s.:..,_6_67_6_2
-I
"Pursuant to K.S.A 22-3001 (e) and K.S.A. 60-1206(a)

Return Petitions To:

Summary Judgment Group
c/o Noah Day & Eric Muathe
P.O.Box 224
& LORI B. FLEMING
WE THE PEOPLE BiLIEVE THAT TO AVOID BIAS AND PREJUDICE FROM THE JUDICIARY
(
.'
SHOULD AUTOMATICALLY
DISQUALIFY ALL THE NAMED JUDGES.
For Questions
Coli: (417) 434-0083
ALL PETITIONERS

The undersigned qualified electors of the County of Crawford and State of Kansas hereby request that the District Court of Crawford County, within 60 days after the filing of this
the disturbing conflicts of interest between JUdges and attomeys (esp. their fonner law partners) including instances of confirmed I shocking economic conflict of interests.
in the judiciary when judges act at times in a manner that does NOT promote public
2. Guilty judges I parties attomeys

ttorneys
who knowingly
Signature
practiced
should be indicted, ousted out of office, moneys earned returned and all related NO DUE PROCESS cases voided, vacated, and reheard.
law in front of a judge with a conflict of interest should face disciplinary action and restitution of client and state income for every such case.
Print
Name
of ~
Pursuant
to K.S.A 22-3001 (C) and K.S.A. 60-1206(a)
**A.J. WACHTER, KURTIS LOY, OLIVER LYNCH, JEFFRY JACK, ROBERT FLEMING, & LORI B. FLEMING
Page ~
WI;.TIIE PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT TO AVOID BIAS AND PREJUDICE FROM THE JUDICIARY
.
SHOULD AUTOMATICALLY DISQUALIFY ALL THE NAMED JUDGES.
ALL PETITIONERS
or Questions Calf: (417) 434-0083

www.judgmentsummary.com

The undersigned qualified electors of the County of Crawford and State of Kansas hereby request that the District Court of Crawford County. within 60 days after the filing of this
the disturbing conflicts of interest between Judges" and attorneys (esp. their former law partners) including instances of confirmed I shocking economic conflict of interests.
The reasonable people of this County have decided that there needs to be an immediate stop to this practice by the implementation of a new 11 th District local rule that bars all
confidence in the independence. integrity. and impartiality of the judiciary and believe it is inappropriate for a Judge to hear cases with open Ihidden conflicts of interests.
2. Guilty judges I parties attorneys should be indicted. ousted out of office. moneys earned returned and all related NO DUE PROCESS cases voided. vacated. and reheard.
ttorneys Whoknowingly practiced law in front of a judge with a conflict of interest should face disciplinary action and restitution of client and state income for every such case.
Email Address
(Optional)
Carrier's Addr ss
N\.. N\.\lM\\-B
\ 0 "\~~~
. have signed above as the carrier of this
petition and do verify upon the

oath that each of the signers on this petition is the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be and that
each signer believes that the statements in this petition are true.
I,
~\~
Page
J:l:..- of ~
*Pursuant to K.S.A 22-3001 (e) and K.S.A. 60-1206(a)
**A.J. WACHTER, KURTIS LOY, OLIVER LYNCH, JEFFRV JACK, ROBERT flEMING,
& LORI B. FLEMING
WETf-{E PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT TO AVOID BIAS AND PREJUDICE r;ROM THE JUDICIARY
DISQUALIFY ALL THE N A1VmD JUDGES.
ALL PETlTIONERS

P.O.Box 224
Pittsburg, Kansas, 66762
For Questions Cal/: (417) 434-0083

www.ConfiictGate.com
GRAND JURY PETITION* TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF CRAWFORD COUNTY,KANSAS

1. Hear testimony and investigate alleged violations of Federal and Kansas DUE PROCESS constitutional law by the systematic and blatant usurpation of judic,ial office and
the disturbing conflicts of interest between Judges' and attorneys (esp. their former law partners) including instances of confirmed I shocking economic conflict of interests.
The reasonable people of this County have decided that there needs to be an immediate stop to this practice by the implementation of a new 11th Districllocal rule that bars all
2. Guilty jUdges I parties attorneys should be indicted. ousted out of office. moneys earned returned and ail related NO DUE PROCESS cases voided. vacated. and reheard.
ttorneys who knowingly practiced law in front of a judge with a conflict of interest should face disciplinary action and restitution of client arid state income for every such case.
66':66
L.
10
Carrier's Signa
Q-\.~
City/Zip
I,
'Ef\\c: I N\. ~\)@e
,have signed above as the carrier of this petition and do verify upon the
I
Page ~
of ~
*Pursuantto
K.S.A 22-3001 (e) and K.S.A. 60-1206(a)
\-VETaE PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT ro AVaID BIAS AND PREJUDICE FRaM THE JUDICIARY ALL PETITiONERS
SHaU1JD AUTOMATICALLY
DlSQTJALIFY ALL THE NAMED JUDGES,
...
)
. Email Address
P.O.Box224
For Questions Call: (417}434-0083
"

the disturbing conflicts of interest between Judges and attorneys (esp. their fonner law partners) including instances of confirmed I shocking economic contlict of interests.
The reasonable people of this County have decided that there needs to be an immediate stop to this practice by the implementation of a new 11'" District local rule that bars all
2. Guilty jUdges f parties attorneys should be indicted. ousted out of office. moneys earned returned and all related NO DUE PROCESS cases voided. vacated. and reheard.
ttorneys Whoknowingly practiced law in front of a judge with a conflict of interest should face disciplinary action and restitution of client and state income for every such case.
10
Carrie
s Signature
""'~~
Carrier's Address
~\Q.;~.~~B
\0 IO\\N..'EK\~
I, ~\
~
~. N\.\li"if~
. have signed above as the carrier of this petition and do verify upon the
Page ~
of ~
\lVETKE PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT TO AVOID lHAS AND PREJUDiCE fROM THE JUDICIARY ALL PETITIONEHS
DlSQUAl.i..FY ALL 'fHE NAMED JUDGES.

P.O.Box 224
GRAND JURY PETITION'" TO THE DIST.RICT COURT OF CRAWFORD COUNTY, KANSAS

the disturbing conflicts of interest between JUdges and attomeys (esp. their fOrmer law partners) including Instances of confirmed I shocking economic confiict of interests.
Judges from hearing their former law partners cases. The people have NO CONFIDENCE in the jUdiciary when judges act at times In a manner that does NOT promote public
2. Guilty jUdges f parties attomeys should be indicted. ousted out of office. moneys eamed returned and all related NO DUE PROCESS cases voided. vacated. and reheard.
!Attomeys who knowingly practiced law in front of a judge with a conflict of interest should face disciplinary action and restitution of client and state income for every such case.
/"
SignatUr'-l,
,w
-/..1
"-J
'/1/1
Print Name
481:1.
unr.
:J....n
EmailAddress
City/Zip
Address
f)()r/v!lJfJrJ
(Optional)
fA/
.J
II
10
Carrier's Signatur~,
'{;n<::....,
\1\1\ \r'H-\lO
Carrier's Name
~\12-
tt\. Nl.JJ~
Carrier's Address
\t\.\() &"\-l.E:K
City/Zip
--
I, $\C- t-/\,. N\l.lt\\\\B'

. have signed above as the carrier of this petition and do verify u~'gn the
Page
..:r:.- of ~
Pursuant to K.S.A ZZ3001IC) and K.S.A. 61H2061a)
A.J. WACHTER, KURTIS LOY, OLIVER LYNCH, JEFFRY JACK, ROBERT FLEMING, & LORI B. FLEMING
WE TKE PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT TO AVOID BIAS AND PREJUDICE FROM THE JUDIOARY
.
,
Emall Address
I D~\RG,.Qb.!ff:
ALL PETITIONERS

Summary Judgment
P.O. Box 224
II=0rQuestions Call: (417) 434-0083

Petition cause a grand jury to be summoned in the County to investigate alleged violations of law and to perfonn such other duties as may be authorized by law:
.confidence in the independence, integrity, and impartiality of the judiciary and believe it is inappropriate for a Judge to hear cases with open Ihidden conflicts of interests.
Attorneys who knowingly practiced law in front of a judge with a conflict of interest should face disciplinary action and restitution of client and state income for every such case.
Signature
5#
l~flf",~
.r,
If)/n.f.of
Address
Print Name
/,/t/ '1Ad5P>,\
IUP!kA
.k
r~1i',,,"l Lo. II
n.J I
42.1
Icu;./l.f"'"
Email Address
City/Zip
u1!5I:J/)
{o,
.r: 7(p -;). .<;f\1e ( \
_IJ
(Optional)
Idh1k~\
D,' tfSbo r ...lfJf.o 7~-:l.
.'1
~
6
7
8
q
10
I,
Carrier's Signature
Carrier's Name
"G\.Q.,~~
Carrier's Address
City/Zip
~\C~.~0~
\\\-'Xv 'Ot\~~
I~\)~~,~~
m\ C
t'4... I'NJ~
, have signed above as the carrier of this petition and do verify upon the
oath that each of the signers.on this petition is the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be and that
Page-~
of ~
**A.J. WACH ER, KURTIS LOY, OLIVER LYNCH, JEFFRY JACK, ROBERT FLEMING, & LORI B. FLEMING
Vv'E TH.E PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT TO AVOID BIAS AND PREJUDICE FROM THE JUDlCIARY
.
SHOULD
AUTOMATICALLY
DlSQUALIFY
ALL THE NAMED JUDGES.
ALL l'ETlTlONERS
Email Address
P.C}.Box 224
For QUestions Call: (417) 434-0083
---
,"
The undersigned qualified electors of the County of Crawford and State of Kansas hereby request that the District Court of Crawford county, within 60 days after the filing of this
the disturbing conflicts of interest between Judges" and attomeys (esp. their former law partners) including instances of confirmed I shocking economic conflict of interests.
confidence in the independence, integrity, and impartiality of the judiciary and believe it is inappropriate for a Judge to hear cases with open lhidden conflicts of interests,
2. Guilty judqes I parties attorneys should be indicted, ousted out of office, moneys earned returned and all related NO DUE PROCESS cases voided, vacated, and reheard.
ft'-ttorneys who knowingly practiced law in front of a judge with a conflict of interest should face disciplinary action and restitution of client and state income for every such case.
Signature
1 ~i\"
dJQ~
112,,~
J/~,"m\..
v
c:'4-J.
\/c. Imp\"
.-
I~I
~
I
3m-<-f'R
I'
'? rvlCl
'jr'It, CoVy\~o
'1~Otn,-{~
A.
..1~
Crc;-cP 5
Address
Print Name
JA
'JIf'L-I
\
I/;IJn&/(
~~
/!.
'i 'I q 1\.1 )Jw \/ &PI

1I3f ~ Z3v1J' '3,t-t02 W FOYM'
t\('>A-<O
, ;n<X <S _ (' In..,.f")to PL;
$or
l.VATZr-
Email Address
City/Zip
(Optional)
f/IY/!J1.- \s.S_ ., (,,, JJ. cO-e.1A.o." (d) G- o, "10

P ;.-rf~6JfJ1; t S,':J rvLo .rt.. c=.o' ~y ~ Y<o/">. fo'.
~ ?~'2/:
v
-':;.5~ r>
\=> i t"Y6
iOL.ur ~
\G-:,.
CAJ2I{..o 2
"
~ UZJ n\V~
I.'
6~
'~lG'.
{\f\O...L
,.
0;o.~.l)"S
r.r: 7 ,,~ ,('
;
fIT-t";
bt./Yfj
n
7
8
q
10
Carrier's Signature
~<2--
'l\IW~
Carrier's Name
~\c... N<.... \\NjM,\\t
Carrier's Address
\4\0 ~~\~\\~
City/Zip
~\\\~~
Email Address
C/'-=V~
~.N\U~
I,
~\u
each signer believes that the statements in this petition are true,
Page ~
of ~
'
*Pursuant to K.S.A 22-3001 (e) and K,S.A, 60-1206(a)
**A.J. WACH ER, KURTIS LOY, OLIVER LYNCH,JEFFRY JACK, ROBERT FLEMING, & LORIB. FLEMING
\OVETHE PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT TO AVOID BrAS AND PREJUDICE FROM THE JUDIC1ARY ALL PETITIONERS
,
SHOULD AUTOMATICALtY
DISQUALIfY ALL THE NAMED fUDGES,

P.O,Box 224
GRAND
JURY PETITION*
TO THE DISTRICT
COURT
OF CRAWFORD
COUNTY,
KANSAS
The undersigned
the disturbing conflicts of interest between Judges'" and attorneys (esp. their former law partners) including instances of confirmed I shocking economic conflict of interests.
2. Guilty judges I parties attorneys
ttorneys who knowingly practiced
Email
Address
(Optional)
10
Carrier's
WC./
I,
BO\\
oath
that
Carrier's
Signature
Name
Carrier's
\ \0
~
L
~fi\\\B
each of the signers
each signer
, have
N1\.
believes that
on this petition
the statements
signed
is the genuine
in this petition
above
signature
Address
Email Address
.;
'\B\.Mre-
as the carrier
of this petition
of the person
whose
and do verify
name it purports
upon the
to be and that
are true.
Return
Petitions
To:
Summary
Judgment
c/o Noah
Day & Eric Muathe
Group
P.0.Box224
Page ~
of
11-~.
*Pursuant
to K.S.A 22-3001
Pittsburg.
(C) and K.S.A. 60-1206(a)
WE THE PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT TO AVOID BIAS AND PREJUDICE HWM THE JUDICIARY
DISQUALIfY ALL THE NAMED JUDGES.
ALL l'ETITIONERS
Kansas, 66762


the disturbing conflicts of interest between Judges" and attorneys (esp. theIr former law partners) including instances of confinned {shocking economic conflict of interests.
The reasonable people of this County have decided that there needs to be an immediate stop to this practice by the implementation of a new 11\h District local rule that bars all
confidence in the independence, integrity, and impartiality of the judiciary and believe it is inappropriate for a Judge to hear cases with open {hidden conflicts of Interests.
2. Guilty judges { parties attorneys should be indicted, ousted out of office, moneys earned returned and all related NO DUE PROCESS cases voided, vacated, and reheard.
ttorneys Who knowingly practiced law in front of a judge with a conflict of interest should face disciplinary action and restitution of client and state income for every such case.
Address
Carrier's Name
~\L.--W\..~
I,
%\~ N\. N\..\J fiS\\B
' have signed above as the carrier of this petition and do verify upon the

Summary Judgment
P.0.80x224
Page ~
of ~
Pursuant to K.S.A 223001 (e) and K.S.A. 6D-1206(a)
**AJ. WACHTER, KURTIS LOY, OLIVER LYNCH, JEFFRV JACK, ROBERT FLEMING, & LORI B. FLEMING
WE THE PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT TO AVOID BIAS AND PREJUDICE FROM rrrs JUDIOARY
SHOULD AUfOMATICALL Y DISQUALIFY ALL THE NAMED JUDGES.
ALL PETITIONERS
or Questions Call: (417) 434-0083

GRAND JURY PETITION""TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF CRAWFORD COUNTY, KANSAS

the dlsturblng conflicts of interest between Judges" and attorneys .lesp. their former law partners) including instances of confirmed { shocking economic conflict of interests.
confidence in the independence, integrity, and impartiality of the judiciary and believe it is inappropriate for a Judge to hear cases with open {hidden conflicts of interests.
2. Guilty judges J parties attorneys should be indicted, ousted out of office, moneys earned returned and all related NO DUE PROCESS cases voided, vacated, and reheard.
Attorneys Whoknowingly practiced law in front of a judge with a conflict of interest should face disciplinary action and restitution of client and state income for every such case.
Signature
Address
Print Name
Email Address
City/Zip
(Optional)
''';0/1Ou:"~,--/'
,
f' 5 -o c.N'i~~
Carrier's Signature
U'i..Q....; t\. .~
t,
'"
t.,\ c..... \'U\. N\.~
Carrier's Name .
'g.,\Q... \{\. ~~
Carrier's Address
\~\O
, have signed above
~~HIt
City/Zip
\t:RR~
:f\'lT'rJ'l,<'o
as the carrier of this petition and do verify upon the
oath that each of the signers on this petition is the genuine signature of the 'person whose name it purportsto
Page~
of
l:\:2L
~!L
be and that
"Pursuant to K.S.A 22-3001 (e) arid K.S.A. 60-1206(a)
WE THE PE01'LE BELIEVE THAT TO AVOID IHAS AND PREJUDICE FROl\1 THE JUDICIARY
SHOUUJ AUTOMATlCALl.Y
DISQUALIFY ALL THE NAM.ED JUDGES.
ALL PETITIONERS
Email Address
~
P.O.Box 224

The reasonable people of this County have decided that there needs to be an immediate stop to this practice by the implementation of a new 11'h District local rule that bars all
2. Guilty judges I parties attorneys should be indicted, ousted out of office, moneys earned returned and aUrelated NO DUE PROCESS cases voided, vacated, and reheard.
ttorneys who knowingly practiced law in front of a judge with a conflict of interest should face disciplinary action and restitution of client and state income for every such case.
ier's Signature
v~~
ffi\ ~ ~. ~
rier's Name
~\Q....J~.Nw~
I,
Page ~
of ~
ws TI-I:E PEOPLE BELlEVE THAT TO AVOlD BIAS AND I'R EjUDI CE FROM THE JUDICIARY ALL PETITIONERS
SHOULD AUTOMATICAl.LY

P.O.Box224

The undersigned
qualified electors of the County of Crawford and State of Kansas hereby request that the District Court of Crawford County. within 60 days after the filing of this
the disturbing conflicts of interest between Judges"
and attorneys (esp. their former law partners) including instances of confirmed I shocking economic conflict of interests.
of a new 111h District local rule that bars all
confidence in the independence.

ttorneys
who knowingly
practiced
should be indicted. ousted out of office. moneys earned returned and all related NO DUE PROCESS cases voided. vacated. and reheard.
Address
Email
Address
Petitions
To:
City/Zip
Return
(Optional)
Summary
Judgment
c/o
Day & Eric Muathe
Noah
Group
P.O.Box 224
Page
Jli:-
of ~
Pursuant
to K.S.A 22-3001
(e) and K.S.A. 60-1206(a)
I>\IETHE PEOPLE BEUEVETFfATTO
AVOIDllIAS
AND l'HEJUDICErROM
THE JUDlC1ARY ALLPIITITIONERS
.
SHOULD AUTOMATICALLY D1SQUAUPY ALL THE NAMED JUDGES.
Pittsburg,
Kansas, 66762
For Questions Coil: (417) 434-0083


The undersigned
qualified electors of the County of Crawford and State of Kansas hereby request that the District Court of Crawford County: within 60 days after the filing of this
1. Hear testimony and investigate alleged violations of Federal and Kansas DUE PROCESS constitutional
law by the systematic and blatant usurpation of judicial office and
of a new t t" District local rule that bars all
1/Yirii/.
Em~il Address (Optional)
City/Zip
Address
Print Name
g~LU*WGll...j Aj'H- .clp
wi-tf-
City/Zip
Email Address
!2....-
.\
I,
c:.... \'!\.. ~~R\\rE;
~\
oath that
each of the signers
each signer
believes that
, have
on this petition
the statements
signed above
is the genuine
in this petition
signature
as the carrier
of this petition
of the person
whose
name
and do verify
it purports
upon the
to be and that
Return
Petitions
Summary
of
.!:i:2:..-
**A.J. WACHTER,
"Pursuant to K.S.A 22-3001
Group
are true.
P.O.Box
Page ~
To:
Judgment
Pittsburg,
(e) and K.S.A. 60-1206(a)
& LORI B. FLEMING
WE THE PEOPLE BELlEVE THAT TO AVOID BIAS AND PREJUDICE .FHOM THE JUDIClARY
SHOULD AUTOMATICALLY DISQUALIFY ALL 'HIE NAMED JUDGES.
ALL PETITIONERS
224
Kansas,
66762

www.ConfiictGate.com
GRAND JURY PETITION" TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF CRAWFORD COUNTY, KANSAS

The undersigned
The reasonable people of this County have decided that there needs to be an immediate stop to this practice by the implementation of a new 11'" District local rule that bars all .
in the judiciary when judges act at times in a manner that does NOT promote public'
Email
Address
Carner's
~~
I,
a\<:..,
~.
~\)k\~
believes that
, have signed above as the carrier

on this petition
the statements
is the genuine
in this petition
signature
of the person
of this petition
whose
and do verify
name it purports
upon the
to be and that
Return
c/o
are true.
Petitions
Summary
of
l:f6-
"Pursuant
Pittsburg,
to K,S,A 22-3001 (C) and K.S.A. 60-1206(a)
""A.J. WACHTER, KURTIS LOY, OLIVER LYNCH, JEFFRY JACK, ROBERT flEMING,
& LORI B. flEMING
WE TRE PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT TO AVOlD BIAS AND PREJUDICE FROM THE JUDiCIARY
SHOULD AUTOMATICALLY DlSQUALll'Y ALL THE NAMED JUDGES.
ALL PETrnONERS
To:
Judgment
Group
Noah Day & Eric Muathe
P.O.Box
Page ~
(Optional)
N..-, ~~
~\G
oath that each of the signers

each signer
Na
Address
224
Kansas, 66762


in the judiciary When judges act at times in a manner that does NOT promote public
I,
. have signed above
oath that
each of the signers
each signer
on this petition
is the genuine
in this petition
signature
as the carrier
of this petition
of the person
whose
and do verify
name it purports
upon the
to be and that
Return
Petitions
Summary
To:
Judgment
Group
are true.
P.O.Bo)(224
Page ~
of
.1t~
**A.J. WACHTER,
*Pursuant
to K.S.A 22-3001
Pittsburg,
(C) and K.S.A. 60-1206(a)
&:LORI B. flEMING
WE THE I'EOI'LE BELIEVE T.HAT TO AVOID BIAS AND PREJUDICE FROM: THE JUDICIARY
.
SHOULD AuTOMATICALLY DISQUALiFY ALL THE NAMED JUDGES.'
ALL l'E"fITIONERS
Kansas, 66762
GRAND JURY PETITION"' TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF CRAWFORD COUNTY, KANSAS

Petition cause a grand jury to be summoned in the County to investigate alleqed'vlolafions of law and to perform such other duties as may be authorized by law:
LHear testimony and investigate alleged violations of Federal and Kansas DUE PROCESS constitutional law by the systematic and blatant usurpation of judicial office and
the disturbing conflicts of interest between Judges and attorneys (esp. their former law partners) including instances of confirmed I shocking economic conflict of interests.
The reasonable people of this County have decided that there needs to be an immediate stop to this practice by the implementation of a new 11 'h District local rule that bars all
confidence in the independence, integrity, and impartiality of the judiciary and believe it is inappropriate for a Judge to hear cases with open Ihidden conflicts of interests .
.2, Guilty judges I parties attorneys should be indicted, ousted out of office, moneys earned returned and all related NO DUE PROCESS cases voided, vacated, and reheard.
Itorneys who knowingly practiced law in front of a judge with a conflict of interest should face disciplinary action and restitution of client and state income for every such case.
Carrier's Name
B/--tC-- NA..NJJ
~~uRG,
ffi\ ~
I,
N\.. ~~
.

P.O.Box 224
Page ~
of.$-
"Pursuant to K:S.A 22-3001 (C) and K.S.A. 60-1206(a)
**AJ. WACHTER, KURTIS LOY, OLIVER LYNCH, JEFFRY JACK, ROBERT FLEMING, & LORI B. FLEMING
WE THE PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT TO AVOID BIAS AND PREJUDICE FROM THE JUDlOARY
All
PETITIONERS

GRAND JURY PETITION*
TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF CRAWFORD
COUNTY,
KANSAS
The undersigned
qualified electors of the County of Crawford and State of Kansas hereby requestthat the District Court of Crawford County, within 60 days after the filing of this
Petition cause a grand jury to be summoned in the County to investigate alleged violations of law and to perfonm such other duties as may be authorized by law:
the disturbing conflicts of interest between Judges" and attorneys (esp. their fonmer law partners) including instances of confirmed /shocking economic conflict of interests.
integrity, and impartiality of the judiciary and believe it is inappropriate for a Judge to hear cases with open /hidden conflicts of interests.
2. Guilty judges / parties attorneys
arrier's
Name
~\C\'{\.~
I,
~\c...
oath that
N\.. tA.0f\\~
each of the signers
each signer
, have
on this petition
signed above
is the genuine
in this petition
signature
as the carrier
of this petition
of the person
whose
and do verify
name it purports
upon the
to be and that
Return
Petitions
Summary
of ~
"Pursuant
to K.S.A 22-3001
(C) and K.S.A. 60-1206(a)
"VEnJE
Group
c/o Noah Dav & Eric Muathe
are true.
P.O.Box
Page ~
To:
Judgment
PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT TO AVOID BIAS AND PREJUDICE FROM THE JUDICIARY ALL PETITIONERS
SHOULD AUTOMATICALLY DlSQUALlFY ALL THE NAMED JUDGES.
Pittsburg,
224
Kansas, 66762

confidence in the independence. integrity, and impartiality of the judiciary and believe it is inappropriale for a Judge to hear cases with open Ihidden conflicts of interests.
2. Guilty judges I parties attorneys should be indicted. ousted out of office, moneys earned returned and all related NO DUE PROCESS cases voided, vacated, and reheard.
Is c,,~1:'
'1~
Carrier's Signature
Q../
I,
~\Q.....
NI\.. ~~~
~v
Email Address
N\.,Nv0~~
oath that each of the Signers on this petition is the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be and that
Page ~
of ~
**A.J. WACHTER, KURTIS LOY, OLIVER LYNCH, JEFFRY JACK, ROBERT flEMING,
& LORI B. flEMING
WE THE PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT TO AVOID BIAS AND PREJUDICE fROM THE JUDICIAR Y ALL PETlTIONERS
2- --->
P.O.Box224
COUNTY, KANSAS
The reasonable people of this County have decided that there needs to be an immediate stop to this practice by the implementation of a new 11'~District local rule that bars all
2. Guilty jUdges I parties attorneys

Attorneys who knowingly practiced
Carrier's
Signature
~~
I,
Carrier's
Name
\2- r---:>
~\.<:.....- 'N\. ~~
oath that
each of the signers
each signer
Email Address
~\Q...,~'~~
, have
on this petition
signed above as the carrier
is the genuine
in this petition
signature
of the person
of this petition
whose
and do verify
name it purports
upon the
to be and that
Return
Petitions
Summary
To:
Judgment
Group
are true.
P.O.Box224
Page ~
of ~
*Pursuant
to K.S.A 22-3001
Pittsburg,
(e) and K.S.A. 60:1206(a)
**A.J. WACHTER, KURTIS LOY, OLIVER LYNCH, JEFFRY JACK, ROBERT flEMING,
& LORI B. FLEMING
WE THE PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT TO AVOID BIAS AND PREJUDICE FROM TtIE JUDICIARY
SHOULD AUTOMATICALLY DISQUALIFY ALL TH'E NAMED JUDGES.
ALL PETITJONEHS
Kansas,
66762
For Questions Calf: (417) 434-0083

www.ConflictGatt;!.co.;.
GRAND JURY PETlTlON* TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF CRAWFORD COUNTY, KANSAS

1. Hear testimony and. investigate alleged violations of Federal and Kansas DUE PROCESS constitutional law by the systematic and blatant usurpation of judicial office and
the disturbing conflicts of interest between Judges" and attorneys (esp. their former law partners) including instances of confirmed / shocking economic conflict of interests.
The reasonable people of this County have decided that there needs to be an immediate stop to this practice by the implementation of a new 11 th District local rule that bars all
!Attorneys who knowingly practiced law in front of a judge with a conflict of interest should face disciplinary action and restitution of client and state income for every such case.
.,Sign~>tIre/7
Print
Address
Name
City/Zip
\%1lPL
\O(
Carrier's
Signature
Thu
,I'd
B?--'c...-
I,
oath
Carrier's
t{,.~
each signer
believes
Name
that
Carrier's
B\\Q.....~,~~
,,,uL~
the statements
City/Zip
signed
is the genuine
in this petition
above as the carrier
signature
of the person
Email Address
IO~~~.Gb~
\J\.\no..\\"-\~~
, have
on this petition
Address
ttll1v
ofthis
petition
and do verify
whose
name it purports
upon the
to be and that
----'
Return
Petitions
Summary
of ~
*Pursuant
to K.S.A 22-3001
Group
are true.
P.O.Box
Page ~
To:
Judgrnent
(e) and K.S.A. 60-1206(a}
\'\'E THE PEOPLE BEUEVE THAT TO AVOID BIAS ANI) Pfl.EJlJlJiCE FROM THE JUDiCIARY ALL PETITJONERS
,
SHOULD AUTOMATICALLY DISQCALJFY ALL THE NAMED J1JDGES.
.
\
Pittsburg,
224
Kansas, 66762


the disturbing conflicts of interest between Judges' and attorneys (esp. theirformer
law partners) including instances of confirmed I shocking economic conflict of interests.
Judges from hearing their former law partners cases. The people have NO CONFIDENCEin
the judiciary when judges act at times in a manner that does NOT promote public
2. Guilty judges I parties

Attorneys who knowingly
attorne,Ys should be indicted, ousted out of office, moneys earned returned and all related NO DUE PROCESScases
voided, vacated, and reheard.
practi&:ed'law in front of a judge with a conflict of interest should face disciplinary action and restitution of client and state income for every such case.
Email Address
Address
Print Name
fVi4f'+;r
.s y
tVY1esT
Cc..-(\
(Optional)
3/1-
)T
(/
10
Carrier's
~Q..;
Signature
~
N\..I.'NJ~
~\.Q...,
Th-\'y ~. WI~
I,
oath
each sign er believes
.have signed above as the carrier
on this petition
that the statements
is the genuine
in this petition
signature
of the person
of this petition
whose
and do verify
name it purports
upon the
to be and that
Return
Petitions
Summary
c/oNoah
are true.
To:
Judgment
Group
Day & Eric Muathe
P.O.Box224
Page ~
of ~
Pittsburg,
WE THE PEOPLE BEUEVE THAT TO A VOID BIAS AN D PREJUDICE FROM THE JUDICIARY
SHOULD AUTOMATICALLY DfSQUALIFY ALL THE NAJvrED JUDGES.
A u, PETITIONERS
Kansas, 66762


The undersigned
2. Guilty jUdges I parties attorneys

ttorneys
who knowingly
practiced
Email Address
?-~
Return
Petitions
Summary
To:
Judgment
Group

P.O. Box 224
Page
2Jf-
of
.!::tL
"Pursuant
to K.S.A 22-3001
Pittsburg,
(e) and K.S.A. 60-1206(a)
WE THE PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT TO AVOID BrAS AND PREJUDICE FROM THE JUDICIARY
ALL PETITIONERS
Kansas, 66762
For Questions Call: {417} 434-0083


the disturbing conflicts of interest between Judges" and attorneys (esp. theiriormer law partners), including instances of confirmed I shocking econornic conflict of interests.
The reasonable people of this County have decided that there needs to be an irnmediate stop to this practice by the irnplementation of a new 11111 District local rule that bars all
Judges from hearing their former law partners cases. The people have NO CONFIDENCEin the judiciary when judges act at times in a manner that does NOT promote public
confidence in the independence, integrity, and impartiality of the [udlciary and believe it is inappropriate for a Judge to hear cases with open Ihidden conflicts of interests.
2. Guilty judges I parties attorneys should be indicted, ousted out of office, moneys earned returned and all related NO DUE PROCESScases voided, vacated, and reheard.
f.ttorneys who knowingly practiced law in front of a judge with a conflict of interest should face disciplinary action and restitution of client and state income for every such case.
..,. Si~ature
Address
Print Name
City/Zip
/
")
10
Ca'lW"':i)igWlWrSl'..?
illlt9,jl/V::
Carrier's ":Ia~
;JOC-J-. f./V}
I 9{rier's Address
11/"A'6X' -;1.:;2 Lf
Cil:y/Zip
I,
II" I.~
~
NI'V'.L (\",' \ .tVavesigned above as the carrier of this petition and do verify upon the
oatHltPK each of tfTl! signers on this petition i~he genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be and that
Page ~
of.!:\:L
Email Address
111if15iJW1hk:J'b.
*Pursuant to K.S.A 22-3001 (C) and K.S.A. 60-1206(a)
**AJ_ WACHTER, KURTIS LaY, OLIVER LYNCH, JEFFRV JACK, ROBERT FLEMING, & LORI B. FLEMING
WE THE PEOPLE BELlBVE THAT TO AVOW BJAS AND PREJUDICE FiWM. THE rODlClARY ALL PETITlONERS
,
,,
SHOULD AUTOMATICALLY DISQUAUFY ALL THE NAMED JUDGES.

c/oNoah Day & Eric Muathe
P.D.Box 224
~
--------,=:.-------------------,.------------------------GRANO JURY PETITION'" TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF CRAWFORD COUNTY, KANSASThe undersigned qualified electors of the County of Crawford and State of Kansas hereby request thai the District Court of Crawford County, within 60 days after the filing of this
Petition cause a grand jury to be summoned In the County' to investigate alleged violations of law and to perform such other duties as may be authorized by law:
1. Hear testimony and investigate alleged violations of Federal and Kansas DUE PROCESS constitutional law by the systematic and blatant usurpation of judicial office and,
the disturbing conflict,S of interest between Judges" and attorneys (esp. thelrformer
law partners) including instances of confirmed I shocking economic conflict of interests.
The reaecnaote people of this County have decided that there needs to be an Immediate stop to this practice by the implementation of a new 11 th Distriet local rule that bars all
Judges from hearing their former law partners cases. The people have NO CONFIDeNCE in the judiciary when judges act at times In a manner that does NOT promote public
confidence in the independence, integrity, and impartiality of the judiciary and believe It is Inappropriate for a Judge to hear cases with open Ihldden conflicts of Interests.
2. Guilty judges I parties attorneys should be i,ndieted, ousted out of office, moneys earned returned and all related NO DUE PROCESS cases voided, vacated, and reheard.
ttorney,s who knoWingly practiced law in front of a judge with a conflict of interest should face disciplinary action and restitution of client and state income for every such case.
Email Address (optional)
Print Name
Carrier's Address
.3~e V'. I'kc,i<"
CltyjZip
#,~/rS'
~ :.:; Emall Address,
..!::----"":c=:.=..'--'.+-" have signed above as the carrier of this petition and do ,verify upon the
oath that each of the sign rs on this petition Is the genuine signature of the person whose name It purports to be and that
each signer believes that the staternents in this petition are true.
Page ~
of ~
"Pursuant
to K.S.A 22-3001 (C) and K.S.A. 60-1206(a)

Summary Judgment
tlo Noah Day & ,Eric Muathe
P. 0, BoxZ24
For Questions CD": (417) 434-0083
WE HIE PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT TO AVOID BIAS AND PRE}UI>lCE FROM THE JUDICIARY ALL PETITIONERS
SHOULD AUTOMATICALLY DISQUALIFY ALL THE NAMED JUDGES. '
www.i=aceBook.comiJudgmentSummary
COUNTY, KANSAS
The undersigned Qualified electors of the County of Crawford and State of Kansas hereby request that the District Court of Crawford County, within 60 days after the filing of this
the disturbing conflicts of interest between Judges" and attorneys (esp. their former law partners) including instances of confimnedI shocking economic conflict of interests.
10
~r's
Signature
City/Zip
rv ~
~"
~(,???-
I.
have signed above as the carrier of this etition and do verify upon the
Page ~
of ~
.*Pursuant to K.S.A 223001 (C) and K.S.A. 60-1206(a)
WI; THE PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT TO AVOID BIAS AND PREJUDICE :FROM THE JUDICIARY ALL PETITIONERS
SHOULD AUTOMATJCALLY DISQUALIfY AIL THE NAMED JUDGES.
Email Address
-----

P.O.Box 224
GRAND JURY PETITION* TO THE DISTRICT COURT
OF CRAWFORD
COUNTY, KANSAS
The undersigned qualified electors of the County of Crawford and Stata of Kansas hereby request that the District Court of Crawford County, within 60 days after the filing of this
1. Hear testimony and investigate alleged violations of Federal and Kansas DUE PROCESS constitullonallaw by the systematic and blatant ueurpation of judicial office and
the disturbing conflicts of interest between JUdges and attomeys (esp. their fonner law partners) including instances of confinned I shocking economic conflict of interests.
Judges from hearing their former law partners cases. The people have NO CONFIDENCE in the judiciary when Judges act at times in a manner that does NOT promote public
confidence in the Independence, integrity, and impartiality of the judiciary and believe it is inappropriate for a Judge to hear cases with open !hidden conflicts of interests.
tlorneys who knowingly practiced law in front of a judge ,with a conflict of interest should face disciplinary action and restitution of client and state income for every such case.
Email Address
I,
have signed above as the carrier of t is petition and do verify upon the
oath that each of the signers on this petition Is the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be and that
Page
9.Z
AJ.
of
$..
Pursuant to K.S.A 22-3001 (C) and K.S.A. 60-1206(a)
WACHTER, KURTIS LOY, OLIVER LYNCH,JEFFRY JACK, ROBER,. FLEMING, & LORI B. FLEMING
WE THE PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT TO AVOID BIAS AND PREJUDICE FROM THE JUDICIARY ALL PETITIONERS
(Optional)

Summary Judgment
P. O. Box 224

www.judgrnentsummary.com
GRAND JURY PETITION TO THE DISTRICT tOURT
OF tRAWFORD
roUNTY,
KANSAS
The undersigned qualified electors of the County of Crawford and Slate of Kansas hereby request that the District Court of Crawford County, within 60 days after the filing of this
the disturbing conflicts of interest between Judges"" and attorneys (esp. their former law partners) including instances of confirmed I shocking economic conflict of interests.
The reasonable people of this County have decided that there needs to be an immediate stop to this practice by the Implementation of a new 11'" District local rule thaI bars all
Judges from hearing their former law partners cases. The people have NO CONFIDENCE in the jUdiciary when judges act at times in a manner that does NOT promote public
confidence in the independence, Integrity, and impartiality of the judiciary and believe It is inappropriate for a Judge to hear cases with open !hIdden conflicts of interests.
2. Guilty judges I parties attorneys should be indicted, ousted out of office. moneys earned returned and all related NO DUE PROCESS cases voided. vacated. and reheard.
tlomeys who knowingly
practiced law in front of
a judge
with a conflict of interest should face disciplinary
action and restitution of client and state Income for every such case.
Ernail Address (Optional

Summary Judgment
Page ~
A.J.
WE ruE
of ~
Pursuant to K.S.A 22-3001 (e) and.K.S.A. 60-1206(a)
WACHTER, KU.RTIS LOY, OLIVER LYNCH, JEFFRY JACK, ROBERT FLEMING, & LORI 8. FLEMING
PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT TO AVOID BIAS AND PREJUDICE FROM THE JUDICIARY ALL PETITIONERS
c/o Noah Day 8. Eric Muathe

P.O. Box 224
Pittsburg, Kansas, 6676Z

GRAND JURY PETITION TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF CRAWFORD COUNTY, KANSAS

Petition cause a grand jury to be summoned in the County to investigate alleged Violations of law and to perform such other duties as may be authorized by law:
1. Hear testimony and investigate alleged violations of Federal and Kansas DUE PROCESS constitutional
law by the systematic and blatant usurpation of judicial office and
and attorneys (esp. their former law partners) including instances of confirmed (shocking economic conflict of interests.
integrity, and impartiality of the judiciary and believe it is inappropriate for a Judge to hear cases with open (hidden conflicts of interests.
2. Guilty judges ( parties attorneys should be Indicted, ousted out of office, moneys earned returned and all related NO DUE PROCESS cases voided, vacated, and reheard.
ttomeys Who knowingly practiced law in front of a judge with a conflict of interest should face disciplinary action and restitution of client and state income for every such case.
Address
I,
have signed
oath
tha
each signer
signers
believes
on this petiti
that the statements
n is the genuine
in this petition
above as the carrier
signature
of the person
Email
of this petition
whose
and do verify
name it purports
upon the
to be and that
Return
Petitions
Summary
Address
(Optional)
To:
Judgment
are true.
P. O. Box 224
Page ~
of
$-
Pursuant
to K.S.A 22-3001
Pittsburg,
(e) and K.S.A. 6O-1206(a)
WE THE PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT TO AVOID BIAS AND PREJUDICE FROM THE JUDIOARY
, .
SHOULD AUTOMATICALLY DISQU~IFY
ALL THE NAMED JUDGES.
ALL PETITIONERS
Kansas, 66762


1.' Hear testimony and investigate alleged violations of Federal and Kansas DUE PROCESS constitutional law by the systematic and blatant usurpation of judicial office and
The reasonable people of this County have decided that there needs to be an immediate stop to this practice by the implementation of a new 111h District local rule that bars all
Email Address
(Optional)
Email Address
c.':'~~~~~~~::L_!L:...:::.J~o!::?,1..\:l""""~'>41-_'
have si
above as the carrier of this petition and do verify upon the
oath that ea
e signers on this petition is the genuine signature of the person whose narne it purports to be and that
Page ~
**A,J,
I,\IE TaE
of ~
WACHTER, KURTIS LOY, OLIVER LYNCH, JEFFRY JACK, ROBERT FLEMING, & LORI B. FLEMING
PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT TO AVOID BIAS AND PREJUDICE fEOM THE JUmCIARY
DISQUALIFY ALL rmi NAM.ED JUDGES.
ALL PETITIONERS

clo Noah Day & Eric Muathe
P.O.Box224

Petition cause a grand jury to be summoned In the County to investigate alleged violations of law and to perform such other duties as may be authorized by law:
1. Hear testimony and investigate alleged violations of Federal and Kansas DUE PROCESS constitulionallaw by the systematic and blatant usurpation of judicial office and
the disturbing conflicts of interest between Judges" and attorneys lesp. their former law partners) including instances of confirmed I shocking economic conflict of interests.
The reasonable people of this County have decided that there needs to be an immediate stop to this practice by the Implementation of a new 11th District local rule that bars all
confidence in the independence, integrity, and impartiality of the judiciary and believe it is inappropriate for a Judge to hear cases with open !hidden conflicts of interests.
2. Guilty judges I parties attorneys should be Indicted, ousted out of office, moneys earned returned and all related NO DUE PROCESS cases voided, vacated, and reheard.
ttorneys Who knowingly practiced law in front of a judge with a conflict of interest should face disciplinary action and restitution of client and state income for every such case.
Email Address
Address
Print Name
City/Zi
14/D
I,
-:('/CI
",,;5 (!.,1"/
;-It;;'"
(Hi;f"f,,~
M /-"'7(/1'11/
have signed above as the carrier of this petition
Page ~
of ~
"Pursuant
Emall Address
tc4'1CvZ
and do verify upon the
oath that each of the signers on this petition Is the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports
to be and that
to K.S.A 22-3001 (C) and K.S.A. 6O-1206(a)
WE THE PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT TO AVOID BIAS AND PREJUDICE FROM THE JUDICIARY
(Optional)
ALL PETITIONERS

Summary Judgment
P. O. Box 224

www.FaceBook.com/JudgmentSummary

Petition cause a grand jury to be summoned in the County to investigate alleged violations of law and to perform such other duties as may be authOrized by law:
the disturbing conflicts of interest between Judges and attomeys (esp. their former law partners) including instances of confirmed I shocking economic conflict of interests.
Judges from hearing their former law partners cases. The people have NO CONFIDENCE In the jUCliciary when judges act at times in a manner that does NOT promote public
confidence In the independence, Integrity, and impartiality of the judiciary and believe it Is inappropriate for a Judge to hear cases with open Ihldden conflicts of Interests.
2. Guilty jUdges I parties attomeys should be indicted, ousted out of office, moneys earned returned and all related NO DUE PROCESS cases voided, vacated, and reheard.
ttomeys Who knowingly practiced law in front of a judge with a conflict of interest shOUld face disciplinary action and restitution of client and state income for every such case.
Print Name
Address
City/Zip
Int'z
I,
Page
33
of ~
*Pursuant
to K.S.A 22-3001 (e) and K.S.A. 60-1206(a)
AJ. WACHTER, KURTIS LOY, OLIVER LYNCH, JEFFRY JACK, ROBERT FLEMING, & LORI B. FLEMING
WE TilE PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT TO AVOID BIAS AND PREJUDICE FROM THE JUDICIARY
DISQUAUFY ALL THE NAMED JUDGES.
ALL PETITIONERS

.
www.FaceBook.comlJudgmentSummary
GRAND JURY PETITION TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF CRAWFORD COUNTY, KANSAS

'The undersigned qualified electors of the County of Crawford and State of Kansas hereby request that the District Court of Crawford County, within 60 days after the filing of this
ttorneys Who knowingly practiced law in front of a judge with a conflict of interest should face disciplinary action and restitution of client and state income for every such case,
Emall Addres,s (Optional)
I,
'Z'?'...- v.' 5
CO P.I-
/& 0
,have signed above as the carrier of this petition and do verify upon the
Summary Judgment
page.3lt:-
P. O. Box 224
of ~
"Pursuant
to K.S.A 223001 (e) and K.S.A. 6O-1206(a)
WE THE PEOPLE BELIEVE TH~T TO AVOID BIAS AND PREJUDICE FROM THE JUDICIARY
ALL PETITIONERS
For QUestions Call: (417) 434-0083


the disturbinq conflicts of interest between Judges and attorneys (esp. their former law partners) includinq instances of confirmed I shocking economic conflict of interests.
The reasonable people of this County have decided that there needs to be an immediate stop to this practice by the implementation of a new 11 Ih District local rule that bars all
Print
Email Address
Name
(Optional)
10
Carrie's
A '0
. nature
4'
q:$ e'1
I, .
e.
K,' V'>:J
' have
oath that each of the signers on this petition

each signer
v.tJ .
signed above as the carrier
is the genuine
in this petition
signature
Email Address
;.rex /01
of the person
I sY('""'S'
of this petition
whose
and do verify
name it purports
(,
t.?6J
upon the
to be and that
Return
Petitions
Summary
To:
Judgment
Group
are true.
P.O.Box224
page..32....
of ~
"Pursuant
Pittsburg,
to K.S.A 22-3001 (C) and K.S.A. 60-1206(a)
';VETlm
PEOPLE I1ELIEVETHAl'TO
AVOID BIAS AND PREJUDiCE f'ROMTHEJUD1C1ARY
.
SHOlJLD AUTOIvlATICALT..Y DiSQUALIFY ALL THE NAMED JUDGFS.
ALLPETlTlONERS
Kansas, 66762
For Questions Cal/: (417) 434-0083j

GRAND JURY P~TITION* TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF CRAWFORD COUNTY, KANSAS

. 1. Hear testimony and investigate alleged violations of Federal and Kansas OUEPROCESS constitutional law by the systematic and blatant usurpation of judicial office and
the disturbing conflicts of interest between Judges" and attorneys (asp. their former law partners) including instances of confirmed I shocking economic conflict o/interests.
The reasonable people of this County have decided that there needs to be an immediate stop to this practice by the implementation of a new 11'h District local rule that bars all
confidence in the independence. integritY,and impartiality of the judiciary and believe it is inappropriate for a Judge to hear cases with open Ihidden conflicts of interests.
2. Guilty judg~s I parties attorneys should be.indicted. ousted out of office, rnoneysearneo returned and all related NO DUE PROCESS cases voided. vacated, and reheard.
Attorneys who knowingly practiced law in front of a judge with a conflict of interest should face disciplinary action and restitution of client and state income for every such case.
City/Zip
\:o.s
Page ~
of
*Pursuant to K.S.A 22-3001 (ejand K.S.A. 60-1206(a)
**A.J. WACHTER, KURTIS LOY, OLiVEn LYNCH, JEFFRY JACK, ROBERT FLEMING, & LORIB. FLEMING
WE THE PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT TO AVOID BIAS AND PREJUDICE FROM THE JUDICIARY ALL PE'l.THONERS
.
.
SHOULD AUTOMATICALl.Y
Email Address
P.O.Box 224
For Questions Ca/l: (417) 434-0083
GRAND JURY PEtiTION'" TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF CRAWFORD COUNTY, KANSAS

The undersigned
qualified electors of the County of Crawford and State of Kansas hereby request.that the District Court of Crawford County, within 60 days after the filing of this
Petition cause a grand jury to be summonedin the County to investigate alleged violations of law and to perform such other duties as may be authorized by law:
the disturbing conflicts of interest between Judges' and attorneys (esp. their former law partners) including instances of confirmed I shocking economic conflict of interests,
The reasonable people of this County have decided that there needs to be an immediate stop to this practice by the Implementation of a new 11th District local rule that bars all
in the judiciary when judges acl at times in a manner that does NOT promote public
2, Guilty judges I parties attorneys should be indicted, ousted out of office, moneys earned returned and all related NO DUE PROCESS cases voided, vacated, and reheard.
Address
'I S ~
I,
oath that each ofthe

each signer believes
signers
on this petition
that the statements
have signed above as the carrier

is the genuine signature of the person
in this petition
of this petition and do verify upon the

whose name it purports to be and that
are true.

Summary Judgment
P. 0, Box 224
Page
iI3::- of ~
"Pursuant
Pittsburg,
to K.S.A 22-3001 (e) and K.S,A. 60-1206(a)
~*AJ. WACHTER, KURTIS LOY, OLIVER LYNCH, JEFFRY JACK, ROBERT FLEMING, & LORI B. FLEMING
WE THE l'EOPLE BELIEVE THAT TO AVOID BIAS AND PREJUDICE FROM THE JUDICIARY
.
ALL PETITIONERS
Kansas, 66762
---

the disturbing conflicts of interest between Judges'" and attorneys (esp. their former law partners) including instances of confirmed I shocking economic conflict of interests.
The reasonable people of this County have decided that there needs to be an immediate stop to this practice by the implementation of a new 111h Districllocal rule that bars all
2. Guilty judges I parties attorneys should be indicted, ousted out of office, moneys earned returned and all related NO DUE PROCESS cases voided. vacated, and reheard.
ttorneYs who knowingly practiced law in front of a judge with a conflict of interest should face disciplinary action and restitution of client and state income for every such case.
I,
e
Page
3~
of ~
WE THE PEOPLE BELIEVE T.HAT TO AVOID BIAS AND PREJUDICE FROM THE JUDICIARY
SHOULD AUTOMATICALI ,Y DISQUALIFY ALL TH.E NAI"fED R'DCES.
ALL PETITIONERS
GRAND JURY PETITION TO THE DISTRICTCOURT OF CRAWFORD COUNTY, KANSAS

Petition cause a grand jury to be summoned in the County to investigate alleged violations of law and to perform such other duties as may be authorized by law;
1. Hear testimony and investigate alieged violations of Federal and Kansas DUE PROCESS constitutional law by the systematic and blatant usurpation of judicial office and
the disturbing conflicts of interest between Judges' and attorneys (esp. their former law partners) including instances of confirmed I shocking economic conflict of interests.
confidence in the independence, integrity, and impartiality of the judiciary and believe it is inappropriate for a Judge to hear cases with open !hIdden conflicts of interests.
2. Guilty jUdges I parties attomeys should be indicted, ousted out of office, moneys eamed retumed and all related NO DUE PROCESS cases voided, vacated, and reheard.
ttomeys who knowingly practiced law in front of a judge with a conflict of interest should face disciplinary action and restitution of client and state income for every such esse.
Emall Address (Optional)
Address
/." " p'&~ <'i:r
pes. 6676~
--'=:::"'-!..l",~::';;'.-'-jR#-I:P.'--==----'
Page ~
of ~
"Pursuant
to K.S.A 22-30011C}
and K.S.A. 60-1206(a)
**AJ. WACHTER, KURTIS LOY, OLIVER LYNCH, JEFFRY JACK, ROBERT FLEMING, & LORI B.FLEMING
.
ALL PETITIONERS
www.FaceBook.com/JudgmentSummarv
-
L~
GRANO JURY PETITION* TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF CRAWFORD COUNTY, KANSAS
_'-_
'The undersigned
qualified electors of the County of Crawford and State of Kansas hereby request that the District Court of Crawford County, within 60 days after the filing of this \
Petition cause a grand jury to be summoned in the County to investigate alleged violations of law and to perfomn such other duties as may be authorized by law:
the (iisturbing conflicts of interest between Judges"
and attomeys (esp. their former law partners) including instances of confimned I shocking economic conflict of interests.
of a new 11th District local rule that bars all
I
I
1~.Guilty
judges I parties
JAttomeys who knowingly
attorneys
practiced
law in front of a judge with a conflict of interest should face disciplinary action and restitution of client and state income for every :::ch case.
Address
City/Zip
Return
Petitions
Summary
Page ~
of ~
"Pursuant
to

P. O. Box Z2.4
Pittsburg, Kansas, 66762.
K.S.A 22:-3001 (e) and K.S.A. 601206(a)
"'*A.J. WACHTER, KURTIS lOY, OLIVER lYNCH, JEFFRY JACK, ROBERT FLEMING, & lORI B. FLEMING
To:
Judgment
ALL PETITIONERS

www.FaceBook.comiJudgmentSumma!y
of
The undersigned
qualified electors.
.th.~C9~rttY Of Crawford and State of Kansas hereby request that the District Court of Crawford County, within 60 days after the filing of this
Petition cause a grand jury lp be.Sumih9nedtri:the
County to investigate alleged violations of law and to perform such other duties as may be authorized by law:
1. Hear testimony and inVe.stigate alleg~d vlolatlons of Federal and Kansas DUE PROCESS constitutional law by the systematic and blatant usurpation of judicial office and
the disturbing conflicts of interest t;JgtWeen juoges** and attorneys (esp. their former law partners) including instances of confirmed I shocking economic conflict of interests.
The reasonable people of this. County have decided that there needs to be an immediate stop to this practice by the implementation
of a new 11'h District local rule that bars all
in the judiciary when judges act at times in a manner that does NOTpromote
public
ttorneys who knowingly
attorneys
practiced
Address
Email Address
~&&7Ul
I,
'r')
oath that
each of the signers
each signer
believes that
on this petition
the statements
is the genuine
in this petition
signature
of this petition
and do verify
of the person whose name it purports
upon the
to be and that
Return
Petitions
Summary
To:
Judgment
Group
are true.
P.O.Box224
Page
.l\:\- of ~
"Pursuant
to K.S.A 22-3001
Pittsburg,
,
(e) and K,S.A. 60-1206(a)
**A.J. WACHTER, KURTIS LOY, OLIVER LYNCH, JEFFRY JACK, ROBERT FLEMING, & LORI B. FLEI\1IING
VVETHE l'EOrLE BEliEVE THAT TO AVOLD BIAS AND PREJOmCE FROM THE rUDIClARY
SH01JLD AUTOMATICALLY DlSQUALIfY ALL THE NAMED JUDGES.
ALL l'ETITTONERS
Kansas, 66762
.

the disturbing conflicts of interest between Judges and attorneys (esp. thelrformer law partners) including instances of confirmed I shocking economic conflict of interests.
Judges from hearing their former law partners cases. The people have NO CONFIDENCEin the judiciary when judges act at times in a manner that does NOT promote public
2. Guilty judges I parties attorneys should be indicted, ousted out of office, moneys earned returned and all related NO DUE PROCESScases voided, vacated, and reheard.
Itomeys who knowingly practiced law in front of a judge with a conflict of interest should face disciplinary action and restitution of client and state income for every such case.
"Email Address (Optional)
Address
Email Address
I,~
Page ~
of
**A.J. WACHTER,
P.O.Box 224

c/oNoah Day & Eric Muathe
& LORI B. FLEMING
WE THE PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT TO AVOID BIAS AND PREJUDICE FROM THE j0DICIARY
.
DISQUALIFY ALL THE NA1"vlED JUDCES.
ALL PETITIONERS

Petition cause a grand jury to be" summoned in the County to investigate alleged violations of law and to perform such other duties as may be authorized by law:
the disturbing conflicts of interest between Judges and attorneys (esp. their fanner law partners) including instances of confirmed I shocking economic conflict of interests.
confidence in the independence, integrity, and impartiality of the judiciary and believe it is inappropriate for a Judge to hear cases with open (hidden conflicts of Interests.
2. Guilty judges I parties attorneys should be Indicted, ousted out of office, moneys earned returned and all related NO DUE PROCESS cases voided, vacated, and reheard.
!tomeys who knowingly practiced law in front of a judge with a conflict of interest should face disciplinary action and restitution of client and state income for every such case.
Address
Signature
City/Zip
<::!
0. /'
I,
f t'
Page
M.. of -
"Pursuant to K.S.A Z2-!l001 (C) and K.S.A. 6O-1206(a)
WE THE PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT TO AVOID BIAS AND PREJUDICE FROM THE JUDK'IARY
ALL PETITIONERS

Summary Judgment
P.O. BoxZZ4

The undersigned
and attorneys (esp. their former law partners) including instances of confirmed I shocking economic conflict of interests.
of a new 11 In District local rule that bars all
ttorneys who knowingly
attorneys
practiced
Email Address
I,
oath
each signer
Page
that each ofthe

believes
signers
that
J:i:!t.- Mof
on this petition
the statements
is the genuine
in this petition
signature
of this petition
of the person whose
and do verify
name it purports
upon the
to be and that
Return
Petitions
Summary
to K.S.A 22-3001 (e) and K.S.A. 60-i206(a)
Pittsburg,
WE THE PEO}'LE BELIEVE THAT TO AVOID BIAS AND PREJUDICE FROM THE JUDICIARY
SHOULD AUTOMATICALLY DISQUALIfY j\LL THE NAMED JUDGES.
Group
are true.
P.O.Box
*Pursuant
To:
Judgment
ALL PETITIONERS
224
Kansas, 66762
For Questions Call:
(417)
434-0083

1. Hear testimony and investigate aUeged violations of Federal and Kansas DUE PROCESS constitutional law by the systematic and blatant usurpation of judicial office and
confidence in the independence, inlegrity, and impartiality of the judiciary and believe it is inappropriate for a Judge to hear cases with open Ihidden conflicts of interests.
,.
Carrier's Name
t. -e
'Ter
t >
I,
&
fer hOd rQ., have signed above as the carrier of this petition and do verify upon the
Page
J:!... of ~
Pursuant
to K.S.A 22-3001 (e) and K.S.A. 6O-1206(a)
**AJ. WACHTER, KURTIS LOY, OLIVER LYNCH, JEFFRY JACK,ROBERT FLEMING, & LORI B. FLEMING
ALL PETITIONERS

Summary Judgment
c/o Noah Day &. Eric Muathe
P. O. BoxZZ4

www.FaceBook.com/JudgrnentSummarv

and attorneys (esp. theirformer
law partners)
including instances of confirmed I shocking economic conflict of interests.
The reasonable people of this County- have decided that there needs to be an immediate stop to this practice by the implementation
of a new 11th District local rule that bars all
Judges from hearing their former law partners cases. The people have NO CONFIDENCEin
the judiciary when judges act at times in a manner that does NOT promote public
confidence in the independence.
integrity. and impartiality of the judiciary and believe it is inappropriate for a Judge to hear cases with open Ihidden conflicts of interests.

Itorneys who knowingly
practiced
should be indicted. ousted out of office. moneys earned returned and all related NO DUE PROCESScases
voided. vacated. and reheard.
Email Address
Return
Petitions
To:

c/oN,?ah Day & Eric Muathe
P.O.Box
JfL
Page ~
of
**AJ. WACHTER, KURTIS LOY, OLIVER LYNCH, JEFFRY JACK, ROBERT FLEMING,
Pittsburg,
& LORI B. FLEMING
WE THE PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT TO AVOID BIAS AND PUEJUDICE FROM THE JUDICIARY
ALL PETTTJONERS
224
Kansas, 66762
For Questions Ca"; (417) 434-0083

GRAND JURY PETITION" TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF CRAWFORD COUNTY, KANSAS

the disturbing conflicts of interest between Judges and attomeys (esp. their fonner law partners) including instances of confirmed I shocking economic conflict of interests.
Judges from hearing their former law partners cases. The people have NO CONFIDENCE in the judiciary when judges act at times In a manner that does NOT promote public
confidence In the Independence, integrity, and impartiality of the judiciary and believe it is inappropriate for a Judge to hear cases with open lhidden conflicts of interests.
ttomeys who knowingly practiced law in front of a judge with a conflict of interest should face disciplinary action and restitution of ciient and state income for every such case.
i,
.ta1
/?-',(4~/,(
"/.1'1.I1
, have signed above as the carrier ofthis
oath that each of the signers on this petition is the genuine signature of the person whose
Page ~
of ~
petition and do verify upon the
name
it purports to be and that
Pursuant to K.S.A 223001 (C) and K.S.A. 6O-1206(a)
AJ. WACHTER, KURTIS LOY, OLIVER LYNCH, JEFFRY JACK, ROBERT FLEMING,
& LORI B. FLEMING
.
SHOULD AUfOMATICALLY
ALL PETITIONERS

Summary Judgment
c/o Noah Day & Eric Muatha
P. O. Box 224
www.FaceBook.comIJudgmentSummarx

Petition cause a grand jurY to be summoned in the County to investigate alleged violations of law and to perform such other duties as may be authorized by law:
1. Hear testimony and investiqate alleged violations of Federal and Kansas DU.EPROCESS constitutional law by the systematic and blatant usurpation of judicial office and
the disturbing conflicts of interest between Judges" and attomeys (esp. their former law partners) including instances of confirmed I shocking economic conflict of interests.
The reasonable people ofthis County have decided that there needs to be an immediate stop to this practice by the implementation of a new 11'h District local rule that bars all
Judges from hearing their former law partners cases. The people have NO CONFIDENc:E in the judiciary when judges act at times in a manner thaI does NOT promote public
Emai! Address (Optional)
.
have sign above as the carrier of this petition and do verify upon the
oat
at eac of the signers on t is petition is the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be and that
Page ~
** A.J.
of ~
"Pursuant
to K.S.A 22-3001 (C) and K.S.A. 60-1206(a)
WACHTER, KURTIS toy, OLIVER LYNCH, JEFFRY JACK, ROBERT FLEMING, & LORI B. FLEMING
WE TH.E PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT TO AVOlDBIAS

AND PREJUDlCE FROM THE JUDICIAl{Y

DlSQUALIFY ALL THE NAMED JUDGES.
ALL PETITIONERS

P.O.Box 224
Plttsburg, Kansas, 66762
www.ConfJictGate.com

Classaction Petition: Injunctive Relief

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Classaction Petition: Injunctive Relief

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

FjL~~D

OTHER DEFENDANTS INCLUDE; KANSAS COMMISSION

CLASS ACTION PETITION AGAINST CORPORATED AND

ASSOCIATIONS FOR INJUNCTIVE AND DECLARATORY

RELIEF ACCORDANCE WITH K.S.A. 60-223(a)(b)(c)(d)(e),

K.S.A. 60-257, AND K.S.A 60-901.

LIST OF PLAINTIFFS; ALL ATIACHED

GRAND JURY PETITIONERS

JUDGE RICHARD M. SMITH

Kasey King, Julie

case number 2011DM136P with Dustin Blair for

inconsistency with recusing under Rule 2.11(A) is why this investigation

district, including Janice Russell, Richard Smith and John Sanders,

Lori Bolton Fleming has already been "NOTED" on

December 13,2012 by the "KANSAS COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL QUALIFICATINES" for her

manager for county attorney Michael Gayoso.

This number conveniently

judges and had a financial CD with Robert Fleming according to his

financial disclosure report.

advice to clients upon being appointed to the bench,

Canon 2 " How does this not relate to Lori Fleming

of firm's office building and son of former partner who is retired

Where did Judge Loy's stock go?

of judge in cases handled by judge's former law firm'; effect of

Kurtis Loy is still

April 28, 2015 was just last month!

In 1987, JE-21 says "Property of newly-appointed

district judge remaining as co-trustee of

was for his eyes only but Chief Judge

right of Due Process Of Law.

as weekend pastor". 'Canon SA and SB(2).

district judge and chair for

In 1988, JE-26 Recusal due to relationship disqualification

under Canon 3C(1)(d)(iv); procedure

should have been a reprimand.

In 1992, JE-38 states, "Judge as member of Kansas Commission on Governmental

In 1994, JE-47 says "Judge as member of non-profit corporation

board of directors. Canon SB."

members who agreed on the

How did John Mazurek get away with being a municipal

in ownership interest in a law firm

Sagehorn's cases when Judge Loy owns the building

the law firm? How was Judge Loy able

and stay in case number 2014CV7P when Travis Carlton

and the judge not be biased?

money for Our Lady of Lourdes

agency which would in effect train judges to consider these

Canon 3E" How does this not relate to the

but this ruling disagrees with her ruling when a

judge should recuse or not recuse.

against an attorney due to his economic conflicts of interest.

position or give an appearance of impropriety.

Canon 4D{1} and Canon 2A." How does this not

Cindy Loy and Eunice

clearly violates Canon 4C(4}(b} which

a judge yet Rule 2.11{A} requires Disqualification

under their rules and they

and that is why the KANSASCOMMISSION ON JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS needs to be

Michael Gayoso County Attorney's Office, and Stephen Phillips

Kurtis Loy for hearing case number

with a letter of caution on June 7, 2011. Robert Fleming also failed to

judicial district and Judge Robert Fleming should have

judges as clients then went in front