Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Introduction
An international joint venture is one of the modes of
entry into a new market. This strategy for market
entry mode has become very frequent in the 1980s
across the globe and, since the mid 1990s, in India.
An international joint venture (IJV) has at least two
partners of different country origin. They have different
reasons to use this market entry mode as compared
to many other possible alternatives. Different multinational corporations (MNCs) form IJVs in different
countries with different objectives that may be
detennined by the total size of the country, exportimport policies, strength of the currency, economic
policies of the country, technological advancement,
and the extent to which MNCs are welcome in the
country. Governments modify business policies and
environment in certain required ways if the reasons
or objectives that the multi-national corporations look
for joint venturing can be understood. In the immediate
past and the future to come, India is opening its
economy and inviting MNCs to participate in business
98
99
Theoretical Framework
Various authors have differently leamt and presented facts about IJVs. The literature
has been intensively studied and an extract of that is presented here as the theoretical
framework. Research done in the field of IJVs across the world highlights many
emerging and key issues. These key issues and the available theory derived from
previous research help us understand the gaps to be filled for more clarity about
IJ V as a market entry mode. In the Indian scenario, the partner identification strategy
for IJV formation needs more intense study. This would provide an understanding
of the incorporation stage of the IJV and its smooth management later A theoretical
framework of partner attributes is developed in the Indian context as follows.
The various attributes of partners for successful international joint venture may
change for the foreign and local partners across countries for the international joint
venturing mode. As can be seen from Exhibit I, the attributes can be classified
broadly irito four main fields - finance-related, technology-related, partner-related
or task-related - and all the partners' attributes can be aligned with one of these main
functions. Partner attributes for both Indian and foreign companies are classified into
operation-related, co-operation related, finance-related and technology-related. These
attributes are a few of the most important partner strengths or partner needs for joint
venturing.
Indian Partner Attributes: Operation-related attributes are the task-based
classifications of strengths or needs of the partner. Indian partner task related
attributes include their strength for marketing, distribution channels, market position,
and corporate image because of their presence in the Indian market in the past. These
tasks are the core-competency of the Indian partner. Co-operation-related attributes
are the partner-related attributes which would aid the other partner and new alliance
in understanding partner dynamics. Organizational leadership and the ability of the
Indian partner to learn and execute are its strengths. Finance-related attributes
include understanding of the working capital and institutional support that the Indian
partner can gamer. But the financial weakness of most Indian companies becomes
their main need for n fnicign partner. Teehnology-related attributes for the Indian
2004
100
partner include the diverse and quality human skill sets available and the abundance
of semi-skilled labor that can support a labor-intensive industry like the automotive.
This is because many of the Indian industries are still working with labor-intensive
methods so as to balance the available semi-skilled workforce pool with the
technology intensive automotive industry, which would otherwise increase the
unemployment rate and disturb the whole economy.
Foreign Partner Attributes: Operations or task-based attributes include the
management style and personnel expertise available with a foreign partner. The
foreign partner can share these attributes in the IJV. The co-operation-related or own
strengths for foreign partner would include their international leadership in the
industry and their excellent training capabilities. These can be shared with the IJV
for suitable learning and positioning on the international arena. Finance-related
attributes would include their financial investment potential wherein they can invest
huge amounts and sustain the venture until the break-even point. Also, they can put
the investments required for technology purchase or technology upgrades. Technologyrelated attributes would include the availability of state-of-the-art technology with
them, and their research and development credentials. This is required taking into
consideration long-term goals and perspectives.
Thus, both the partners have their own attributes, which can be their strengths or
needs/requirements to support their weaknesses. If the strength of one partner is the
need of another partner, then there evolves a fit case for collaborative organization.
This becomes the complementarity of partner attributes. Four different types of fit
or alignment between the parent organizations explain this for joint venturing strategic fit, technological fit, organizational fit and financial fit. The theoretical
framework developed about various attributes of foreign and Indian partners for the
fonnation and success of international joint ventures in India is presented in
Exhibit 1.
Strategic fit evolves if the operation or task related attributes of partners are suitable
for them to come together and complement each other. Thus, for IJVs in India, the
foreign partner can bring in management style and expertise in personnel, whereas.
/ Ou \
1
-
UJ
a,
UJ
1-
u:
O
zgfe
Ol H LU
VEST
CHNI
VEST
OPER,
TASK
/\
1
\_
^.'*
UJ D
H
vi
I- X
zUJ yjJ
\
\
.NAGEI
ISONN
ps
LU
\ 7 -^
P LU
<
1 U a.
CO-0
PART
LU LU
C- Z
"/
\
\
/
/
\ S
\J
1
1
LU H
> oi
LU <
Q LU
>
r
k
O Zi
LJ
z
Z >
t - c^j
fZ
LU
c
O
^ r; w
<*i r n
^ ^z
f , Li. _1
<
<; UJ Z
LU f- X
00 < U
x'-q
E^ o o
LU b LU
a: V)
>
ffl
<p'<^
O
7
i-
- 1 -
wl
^
z2
^ <5
- -
<
oj _ i^
_j O _J
z
o
o <
t Z
LU
ooo
H hz
a.
15
LU
:^
m O
Q
f<
<
V.
5 5 a
a:
CO
101
102
103
Research Methodology
Sample Selection and Data
The scope of this paper includes joint ventures in the Indian automotive sector with
at least one foreign partner and one Indian partner. Stratified random sampling was
used for collecting data. IJVs from automobile manufacturers and automotive
component manufacturer organizations were selected for the study. There are about
36 major automobile manufacturing ventures in India that have foreign participation.
Of these, 30 are joint ventures and the remaining are wholly owned subsidiaries.
In addition, there arc more than 300 auto component international joint ventures.
The present study is based on the primary data collected from these IJVs. The
automotive industry sector is generally considered very dynamic In terms of
environmental conditions. Liberalization of the Indian economy and the entry of
multinationals, forced organizations to review their strategies and processes
continuously.
In this study, the entire 30 automobile manufacturing IJVs and, based on purposive
and convenience sampling, 70 automobile components manufacturing IJVs were
selected. The paper is based on the empirical analysis of the data collected through
a structured questionnaire. The variables for these parameters were chosen from the
literature and selected for the Indian context to build a questionnaire, which was
administered to top executives of the automotive industry. Multiple questionnaires
were sent to all these joint ventures depending on their size. The number of
questionnaires mailed for response ranged from 1 to 10 for each international joint
venture. A total of 850 questionnaires were sent across to 100 IJVs. Responses came
from 50 IJVs out of the 100 IJVs contacted. The sample of the respondents consists
of 161 top-level management executives from corporate affairs, strategic planning,
finance and various departments of the 50 different organizations. It came from 104
respondents from automobile manufacturing and 57 respondents from automobile
component manufacturing IJVs. Thus, the organization response rate is 50% and the
individual response rate is 18.94%. In terms of a sector-wise break up, 70.00% of
the automobile manufacturing organizations (i.e., 21 out of 30) and 41.43% of the
automotive component manufacturing organizations responded (i.e., 29 out of 70).
2004
104
105
106
Cumulative
% of
Variance
%
% of
Variance
Cumulative
%
3.697
26.405
26.405
2.318
16.556
16.556
2.248
16.058
42.463
2.299
16.424
32.980
1.620
11.573
54.036
2.178
15.554
48.534
1.200
8.569
62.605
1.970
14.071
62.605
Looking at the rotated matrix, the first factor has high loadings from three variables,
and has a low loading for others. Because these items load on the same factor, this
is a justification for combining these items in a component that might be called the
factor name that is being provided below. Similarly, other components are also
provided with factor names. These variables have been loaded on a factor loading
of greater than 0.5. The foreign partner objectives for entering into an international
joint venture has mainly four components as listed below:
Decision, Vol. 31, No. I. January - June, 2004
107
1.
2.
3.
Reduce fmancial risk. Access financial resources. Cost sharing for R&D
4.
Component
-0 077
0.822
-0.117
2.
U.3I7
O.ii9
0.302
-0.022
3.
-0.024
o.zu
0.129
-0.196
4.
-0.176
0.600
0.205
0.523
5.
-0.066
0.219
-0.085
0.642
6.
0.133
0.082
0.791
0.183
7.
0.819
0.031
0.110
0.112
8.
0.777
0.087
0.190
-0.057
9.
0.438
0.594
0.212
-0.110
0.230
0.586
0.152
0.303
0.138
0.239
0.700
-0.165
0.743
0.207
-0.186
0.210
0.199
-0.105
-0.212
0.732
0.165
-0.287
0.186
0.686
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis. Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Nonnalization.
Rotation converged in 8 iterations.
108
S. No.
Mean
Item-Total
Alpha if
(Scale: 1 to 5) Correlation Item Deleted
4.06
0.5320
0.7005
3.33
0.6300
0.5836
2.80
0.5534
0.6756
Alpha = 0.7430
109
The mean value o f aecess materials & components' is lower than the overall average
of 3.40 suggesting that this is perceived to be low as compared to the other
objectives. Item to total correlation of 'access local resources' is the strongest
suggesting that labor resource is the most correlated local resource looked for by
the foreign partner Beamish and Inkpen (1995) and Inkpen and Beamish (1997)
indicated that the acquisition of local knowledge over time by foreign partners, in
fact, increased the probability of JV instability. In their study, Hennart et. al., (1998)
found that experience in a host country had no impact on termination. This shows
that previous authors have studied local knowledge or experience also and that
foreign partners make IJVs for acquiring local knowledge. This is also proved by
the results of this paper.
Accessing requisite labor resources, materials and components in a foreign country
are the most important variables that any foreign partner would search for. Also,
IJV being chosen as a means to enter the Indian market clearly shows that these
are the local resource-related factors. Thus, this factor is named as local resource
related factor. The Cronbach alpha coefficient value for 'local resource factor' is
0.7427 surpassing the level of 0.70 recommended by Nunnally (1978) for the
acceptance level of reliability suggesting that the factor is reliable. Also, on the
deletion of any of the items, the alpha value is not improving, proving that these
3 items define the factor.
110
Item
Mean
(Scale: 1 to 5)
Internationalization of business
3.53
0.4748
0.6825
3.12
0.4611
0.6906
2.96
0.4232
0.7021
2.92
0.5620
0.6475
2.25
0.5143
0.667!
Alpha = 0.7249
Item-Total
Alpha if
Correlation Item Deleted
'Avoiding or delaying competition' has got a mean value equal to the overall average
of 2.96 for the factor, indicating that this item is also taken into consideration. A
very low mean value of 'Access international managerial expertise' clears the fact
that foreign companies are strong in this function and so, they are not bothered about
this item. Strategic considerations, such as, getting returns on the technology and
patents that have been developed while creating and improving processes, achieving
economics of scale so as to reduce the cost of production, and avoiding or delaying
competion from prospective competitors by making them partners in business,
become critical from the perspective of organizations which are venturing into new
markets. Also, business expansion plans and globalization efforts while simultaneously
tapping the international managerial expertise are a result of the organization's
business considerations. Hence, this component is named as the business strategy
related factor.
Financial Resource Related Factor
Replies from the respondents indicating the level of importance on a 1 to 5 point
scale shows that financial resources are having a low mean value ranging from 2.39
to 2.78 with an overall average of 2.53. This clearly shows that the foreign partner
is not making an international joint venture with the aim of accessing finances. But
the presence of this factor also shows their concern for financial commitment. They
need an Indian partner to participate financially so as to have his interest in the
business and reduce any ftiture risk.
Decision. Vol. 3!, No. 1. January - June, 2004
111
While venturing into a new market, consideration about reducing financial risk
becomes of prime importance. Also, access to alternate financial resources while
setting up a new business increases the resource generation capability for business
and confidence about the business. This would give an edge by making possible
cost sharing for huge investment-ied research and development plans in the future.
This leads to the third factor which is the financial resource-related factor. The
reliability coefficients for the 3 items in this factor are as presented in Table 5.
Table 5: Financial Resource Related Factor - Item Total Statistics
Item
S. No.
Mean
(Scale: 1 to 5)
Item-Total
Alpha it
Correlation Item Deleted
2.78
0.6263
0.6030
2.43
0,5537
0.6882
2.39
0,5522
0,6896
Alplm = 0.7477
112
and have their own restrictions for FDI and foreign equity. The reliability coefficients
for the 4 items in this factor are presented in Table 6.
Table 6: Country Business Environment Related Factor- Item Total Statistics
Mean
Item-Total
Alpha if
(Scale: 1 to S) Correlation Item Deleted
S. No.
Item
Overcome government
restrictions and trade barriers
3.06
0.3989
0.4990
2.96
0.3227
0.5561
2.60
0.3948
0.5026
2.42
0.3741
0.5185
Alpha = 0.5912
The culture of India, related customs and political understanding of the country
becomes very critical in the case of any foreign company investing in India.
Although the necessity of having an Indian partner in the venture is not mandatory
in Indian business laws for most of the sectors now, a home country partner is
strongly advised to overcome trade barriers and government restrictions in India as
also in many other countries. This is named as the country business environment
related factor.
The variable "Avoiding or delaying competition" is present in factor 2 and also in
factor 4. This variable is a strategic consideration and is also related to the
competitors, which is an extraneous factor to any organization and internal to the
industry dynamics of the country. Factor 2 comprises of business-related strategic
variables and factor 4 comprises of institutional factors that are country specific.
Thus, its presence in both factors is valid & explainable. The Cronbach alpha value
for the reliability analysis is greater than 0.59 for all the factors. The item-total
statistics proves that these items completely specify a particular factor, as the value
of alpha could not be improved further by the addition or deletion of any item.
113
collaborative joint venture (Hame!, 1991; Geringer, 1991). Johnson et. al., (1996)
found that partners' complementarity contributed to the building of trust in the joint
venture. Two factors (nature of technology and export orientation) are particularly
pertinent in a developing country context, as direct foreign investment and joint
ventures are routes to technology transfer and export development (Luo, 1995;
Kogut. 1988; Harrigan, 1988). Hill and Beamish (1997) approached contributions
from a functional perspective (e.g., marketing/sales, distribution/logistics, and
research and development) and argued that distinctness in resources is reflective of
distinctive complementary competencies.
For the purpose of this research study, factor analysis has been used which gives
meaningful components for the importance of objectives from the perspective of the
Indian partner. The total variance explained by the components in the factor analysis
for theimportance of objectives for the Indian partner is tabulated in Table 7. The
extraction method used is principal component analysis (PCA).
Table 7: Total Variance Explained - Indian Partner Objectives
Component
% of
Cumulative
Variance
%
% of
Variance
Cumulative
%
3.620
27.845
27.845
2.194
16.877
16.877
1.437
11.056
38.901
1.844
14.185
31.062
1.325
10.189
49.091
1.755
13.503
44.565
1.230
9.460
58.551
1.678
12.906
57.470
1.168
8.983
67.534
1.308
10.064
67.534
Table 8 presents the factor loadings of the components for Indian partner objectives.
The factor loadings are the correlation coefficients between the variables (rows) and
factors (columns). The factor loadings are the basis for imputing a label to different
factors. Looking at the rotated matrix, the first factor has high loadings on four
variables, and has a low loading on others. Because these items load on the same
Decision. Vol. 31. No. 1. January ~ June, 2004
114
factor, this is a justification for combining these items in a component that might
be called the variable name that is being provided below. Similarly, other components
are also provided with the appropriate factor names.
Table 8: Rotated Component Matrix - Indian Partner Objectives
Component
Variable
1
1.
0.150
0.047
0.153
0.850
-0,061
2.
0,013
0.277
0,053
0.793
-0,0.37
3,
0,216
0.0H7
0.657
0.0S5
0.163
4.
0.058
0.339
0.569
0.112
-0.345
5.
-0.097
0.842
0.133
0,099
0,136
trade barriers
6.
0.642
0.043
0,230
0.444
-0,056
1.
O.I,S4
0.667
-O,iO!
0,2(i3
-0,053
S.
0.765
0.272
0.018
-0.026
-0.190
9,
0.223
0,236
0,2 It
-0,019
0.768
0,04S
-0.082
0.836
0,097
-0,001
0.749
-0,095
0,11S
0,129
0,284
0.443
0.166
0,296
0,058
-0,656
0.522
0.560
0,219
-0.029
0.012
tixlractioii Mcihod: Principal Component Analysis, Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Nonnalization,
Rotation converged in 8 iterations.
These variables have been loaded on a factor loading of greater than 0.5. Indian
partner objectives for entering into an IJV have been factored mainly into four
components as below:
1.
2.
115
3.
4.
S. No.
Mean
(Scale: 1 to 5)
Item-Total
Alpha if
Correlation Item Deleted
3.57
0.434!
0.7153
3.45
0.5502
0.6715
3.29
0.5624
0.6640
2.16
0.4389
0.7119
1.82
0.5172
0.6853
Alpha = 0.7359
Thus, all the items, that is, access financial resources, materials & components of
foreign partner, share the cost for R&D, develop cultural taiiiiliarity with world at
large, and use foreign partner to gain political protection or a favor in political circles
Decision. Voi3I, No. I. Januarv - June. 2004
116
can be seen from a long-term perspective. Thus, this factor is named the long-term
competency-competitiveness generation factor. Also, the alpha value of 0.7383
gives the needful range of value to prove the internal consistency and reliability of
the factor. Thus, the Indian partner is generating the long-term competency level
using the strengths of the foreign partners and is trying to acquire the competencies
of the foreign partner.
S. No.
Item
Overcome government
restrictions or trade barriers
2.30
0.5138
0.4034
2.22
0.3757
0.6073
1.82
0.4202
0.5469
Alpha = 0.6251
\\1
Item
Item-Total
Mean
Alpha if
(Scale: 1 to 5) Correlation Item Deleted
4.27
0.4397
0.3507
3.68
0.1540
0.5508
Internationalization of business
3.49
0.3931
0.3372
3.45
0.2672
0.4635
Alpha = 0.5068
The mean value of 4.27 for transfer of technology is the highest among all the items.
Another important consideration for the Indian partner while looking for an IJV
partner is to 'access international managerial expertise'. Also global strategic moves
from the Indian partner would be likely to internationalize business and simultaneously,
to gain competitive advantage.
From the Indian partner perspective, the third factor comprising of transfer of
technology & patents, avoiding or delaying competition, access to international
managerial expertise and internationalization of business can be called the MNC
techno-managerial advantage factor because these all arise from the technical
need of managerial capability required by the Indian partner. Although the alpha
value would improve if the variable "Access international managerial expertise" is
deleted, the variable looks very logical to be in this factor where techno-managerial
needs are taken into consideration. Also, the alpha value is greater than 0.5, which
is in the acceptable range.
Financial Resource Related Factor
An overall average of 3.4 for the factor with the mean value of items from 3.37
to 3.45 shows a very high focus on these financial resources by the Indian partner.
The importance of financial resource generation arises from the fact that most Indian
organizations go for financial collaborations. They may do so from the perspective
of reducing risk and investment. The reliability coefficients for the 3 items in this
factor are presented in Table 12.
Decision, Vol. 31. No. I, January - June, 2004
118
Item
Mean
kern-Total
Alpha if
(Scale: 1 to 5) Correlation Item Deleted
3.45
0.4071
0.6802
3.37
0.4624
0.6059
3.37
0.5947
0.4215
Alpha = 0.6720
Starting a new big venture requires large capital. The Indian partner would like to
have an IJV and a foreign partner so as to reduce financial risk, achieve economies
of seale/scope and access the financial resources of the foreign partner This factor
is called the financial resource-related faetor. Although the alpha value would
improve if the variable "Access financial resources" is deleted, the improvement in
alpha value is not significant enough to remove the variable, and the variable looks
very logical to be in this factor where financial resources are taken into consideration.
Also, the Cronbach alpha value is greater than 0.5.
Various authors have suggested similar results. Several studies have attempted to
explain partners' objective or motivation to participate in a JV (Hatfield and Pearce,
1994; Hannart, 1988). These studies have uncovered an overlap between observed
and reported goals, including risk reduction, technology exchanges and knowledge
acquisition, co-optation or blocking of competition, facilitation of international
expansion, vertical quasi-integration advantages, economies of scale, overcoming
government barriers to trade and investment, financial goals of increased revenues,
profits, and available capital. Further, empirieal research has shown that this list of
published goals can be logically and statistically grouped into categories centering
on knowledge transfer, market power, financial performance, and structure and
efficiency (Hatfield and Pearce, 1994). These results for partner objectives are very
close to the grouping that the analysis of this research is showing.
The viiriable "Develop cultural familiarity" is clubbed in factor 1, which is longtenn orientation for resources. Thus the Indian partner goes for an IJV and takes
familiarization with foreign culture as a long-temi orientation. Even after the
119
120
strategies. Thus, these partner strategies in an IJV show a fit between the need and
expeetation by a partner and the fulfillment of that objective by the other partner(s).
As shown in the model in Exhibit 2, the most interacting Indian partner objectives
are 'MNC teehno-managerial advantage" and 'long-term competency-competitiveness
generation factor". This is shown in the model from the fact that these objectives
are interacting strongly with two foreign partner objectives and weakly with one
foreign partner objective. This is also clear from the business environment existing
in the eountry. Indian partners are looking to foreign partners for technology,
managerial need and long-term competency generation in the sense of knowledge.
Similarly, the most interacting foreign partner objective is 'local resource related'.
This is shown in the model to be interacting strongly with three Indian partner
objectives. It is well known in the business, thai the foreign partner is looking for
an Indian partner to gain local know-how and local support. Various researchers had
suggested this view in the past. The need for partners' complementary skills and
resources is a primary motivation for the formation of joint venture arrangements
(Geringer 1988; Hamel 1991; Beamish 1990). Geringer (1991) found that the need
for partners' complemenlai^ resources (such as market knowledge, market access,
local identity, and marketing channel) was the most important partner selection
criterion. Thus, the model developed and presented in Exhibit 2 captures and
explains the interactions between the strategies of Indian and foreign partners in
international joint venturing.
Conclusions
This paper covers the partner identification strategy for international joint venturing
in India in the automotive sector from the list of most probable objectives for each
partner. International joint ventures are made for several objectives. The objectives
of the Indian partner and the foreign partner may differ. These are assessed from
the individual perspective of the foreign partner and the Indian partner by eapturing
the importance of each objeetive for joint venturing which the partner is seeking.
These items for the identifieation of Indian and foreign partners are factored into
board components which can completely depict the reasons for joint venturing.
Faetor analysis gives the faetors from the list of objectives. An item is included in
Decision, Vol. 31. No. I, January - June, 2004
121
T3
O
s
u
0)
O
V
0.
nt
Q.
C
D)
3
C
'5
a
Q.
C
'feet
0)
rong
KEY:
eak i
m
c
acti
racition iffect
X
LU
2.
3.
4.
The interaction effects of these objectives are studied through the model created.
Despite the simplicity of the model, it provides substantial infonnation on the partner
selection criterion of international joint ventures. In essence, the partner identification
criterion for foreign partner and Indian partner in the automotive sector in India are
inter-dependent and complementary in nature. This is depicted, in Exhibit 2, by the
consolidated model for the objectives of both the partners. Here, interaction effects
are shown as strong and weak depending on the expectations and need of the partner.
Organizations and partners are looking for complementary skills in their prospective
IJV partner.
122
123
References
Beamish, Paul W. (1990). Multinational Joint Ventures in Developing Countries, London
& New York: Routledge.
Beamish, Paul W. and A. C. Inkpen (1995), Keeping Intemational Joint Ventures Stable and
Profitable, Long Range Planning, 28(3), pp. 26-36.
Beamish, Paul W. and A. Dclios (1997), Incidence and Propensity of Alliance Formation,
In P. W. Beamish and J. P. Killing (editors). Cooperative Strategies: Asian Perspectives,
San Francisco: The New Lexington Press, pp. 91-114.
Geringer, J. M. (1988), Joint Venture Partner Selection: Strategies for Developed Countries,
Westport. Connecticut: Quorum Books.
Geringer, J. M. (1990), Trends and Traits of Canadian Joint Ventures, Ottawa: Investment
Canada.
Geringer, J. M. (1991), Strategic Determinants of Partner Selection Criteria in Intemational
Joint Ventures, Journal of International Business Studies, First Quarter. Vol. 22, No.
1, pp. 41-62.
Hamel, Gary (1991), Competition for Competence and Inter-partner Learning within
International Strategic Alliances, Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special
Issue. 12, pp. 83-103.
Hamel, Gary (1988), Strategic Alliances and Partner Asymmetries, Management International
Review, Special Issue, pp. 53-72.
Hatfield, L. and J. A. II Pearce (1994), Goal Achievement and Satisfaction of Joint Venture
Partners, Journal of Business Venturing. 9(5), pp. 423-449.
Hennart, J. F. (1988), A Transaction Cost Theory of Equity Joint Ventures, Strategic
Management Journal. Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 361-374.
Hennart, J. F. et. al., (1998), The Impactof Joint Venture Status on theLongevity of Japanese
Stakes in U. S. Manufacturing Affiliates, Organization Science. 9(3), pp. 382-395.
Hill, R. C. and Paul W. Beamish (1997), Knowledge, Bargaining Power and the Instability
of International Joint Ventures, Academy of Management Review. Vol. 22, No. I, pp.
177-202.
Johnson, J. L. et. al., (1996), Setting the Stage for Trust and Strategic Integration in Japanese
U. S. Co-operative AWmnces, Journal of International Business Studies, 27(5, Special
Issue), pp. 981-1004.
2004
124
Kim, W. C. and P. Hwang (1992), Global Strategy and Multinational's Entry Choice Mode,
Journal of International