Professional Documents
Culture Documents
II.
I.
(1)
INTRODUCTION
sr (t, t) Aa H i rect(
t
i 1
2Ri
TP
c )e j 2 Q{ fc (t
2Ri
c
2R
1
) k (t i )2 }
2
c
N (t )
(2)
where
jwc t
(3)
N o kTo N F BF
where,
is
Boltzmann
constant,
k 1.38 q 1023 J
Rref
sref (t, t) e
j 2 Q { fc (t
2Rref
c
2Rref 2
1
) k (t
) }
c
2
When the form of target movement with the high speed and
acceleration is relatively complex, the received radar echo is
P
t 2Ri (t, tm )
siR (t, tm ) Aa H i rect
Tp
i
2
2R (t ,tm ) 1 2Ri (t,tm )
k t
}
j {2 Q fc t i
2
c
c
(5)
N (t )
1
a (t )t2
2 T m
N (t )
After de-chirping,
si (t ) Aa H i rect
e
4S k (
(4)
H
By the (2), i reflects the scattering feature of target. The
simulation method based on multiple scattering point model,
where each point is assumed to be isotropic and independent, is
difficult to accurately approach the real target. For the complex
H
targets, a few samples of i cant reflect the real scattering
feature, but HRRP contains the complex and full scattering
information. So, when the HRRP of target is gained, the echo can
be got by (6), where N shows the profile cell total. The received
echo is
(6)
si (t, tm ) Aa
i=1
where,
R%i
2R%i
4Q{
4Qc k
c
fc
k
III.
R%i 2
V (t )
V (t )
4Qk ( T m 1) T m t2
c
c
2Rref (tm ) 2R%i 2
fc
2Qa[ k
)]t
c
c2
c2
t 2Ri (t, tm )
rect
rect
Tp
O (t )
'1i (t, tm )
i=-N/2
N (t )
(7)
kt
N/2
H rect
e
Hi
N
Step(4): Calculate the echo amplitude Aa and 0 by radar
equation. And add radar noise by (3) into (7).
The swept
data
IFT
HRRP
'2i (t, tm )
Add radar
noise
'3i (t, tm )
1581
IV.
SIMULATION EXAMPLES
range
3
1
-0.5
-2
-4
Relativity: U
target type
1
0
0.5
-1
-2
Method
this method
ESPRIT
this method
ESPRIT
this method
ESPRIT
this method
ESPRIT
this method
ESPRIT
the amplitude
-2
-1
range(m)
Fig.2. HRRP
theoretic value
the amplitude
0
-4
-3
-2
-1
T
T
measure
i
measure 2
i
Tisimulation
simulation 2
i
SNR (dB)
No noise
20
15
10
5
Standard error
0.08
0.25
0.18
0.42
0.27
0.65
0.40
0.85
0.51
1.12
Relativity
0.95
0.83
0.91
0.80
0.87
0.75
0.85
0.69
0.83
0.65
Fig.4 and Fig.5 are the radar echo and HRRP at different
velocity and same acceleration, respectively. The results show
that with the accretion of radial speed, the excursion and
aberration of HRRP shifts severely, which is coincided with the
theoretical expectancy.
i 1
Tisimulation
-3
measure
i
TABEL 2 the evaluation results between this method and ESPRIT method under
different SNR
-4
0
-5
1
M
Standard error: F
4
-5
x 10
1582
-9
amplitude
1.5
V.
x 10
0.5
0
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
5
-5
x 10
REFERENCES
-9
amplitude
1.5
x 10
[1]
[2]
0.5
[3]
0
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
5
-5
x 10
[4]
-9
amplitude
1.5
x 10
[5]
0.5
0
-5
[6]
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
[7]
-5
x 10
0.9
0.8
0.7
amplitude
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
-5
-4
CONCLUSION
-3
-2
-1
range(m)
1583