Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Counsel
For Appellant: Lieutenant Colonel Brandon A. Burnett (argued); Lieutenant
Colonel Beverly B. Knott, Lieutenant Colonel Timothy W. Murphy, and Major
Maria A. Fried (on brief); Colonel James R. Wise.
Military Judge:
J. Jeremiah Mahoney
I. BACKGROUND
told him that JB had been injured when he fell from the sofa,
and that JB later walked unimpeded.
child abuse because, in his view, the injury could only have
been caused by twisting the leg, and the child would not have
been capable of walking with such an injury.
Appellant, who was interviewed by agents of the Air
Force Office of Special Investigations (AFOSI) as a suspect,
waived his rights and responded to their questions.
After
Appellant told
Using a
According to Agent
These Manual provisions are identical to the ones in effect at the time of
appellant's court-martial.
During cross-examination,
II. DISCUSSION
Mil. R. Evid. 304(h)(2) is a longstanding rule of
completeness pertaining to confessions introduced against an
Id. at 298.
Under
See Beech
We
III. CONCLUSION
The decision of the United States Air Force Court of
Criminal Appeals is affirmed.
introduced at trial.
Appellants written
See United
See Article
The
This same
Therefore, I conclude