Professional Documents
Culture Documents
txt
Citation Nr: 1639918
Decision Date: 09/30/16
DOCKET NO.
)
)
2.
REPRESENTATION
Appellant represented by: Paralyzed Veterans of America, Inc.
ATTORNEY FOR THE BOARD
D. Orfanoudis, Counsel
INTRODUCTION
The Veteran had active duty service from February 1975 to October 2000.
This appeal to the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) arose from a June 201
The Board notes that, in a March 2014 submission, the Veteran's representat
In August 2015, a Deputy Vice Chairman of the Board granted a motion to adv
In December 2015, the Board remanded the claims on appeal for further evide
This appeal is now being processed utilizing the Veterans Benefits Manageme
The Board's disposition of the TDIU claim is set forth below.
The matter o
FINDING OF FACT
In a June 2016 rating decision, VA granted the Veteran's claim for a TDIU,
CONCLUSION OF LAW
Because the June 2016 award of TDIU for the entirety of the period on appea
REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDING AND CONCLUSION
The Secretary shall decide all questions of law and fact necessary to a dec
Although the Veteran perfected an appeal to the Board with respect to the d
Under these circumstances, the Board finds that the TDIU claim which was
ORDER
The appeal as to the claim of entitlement to a TDIU is dismissed.
REMAND
The Board's review of the claims file reveals that further AOJ action on th
A VA medical opinion dated in May 2016 shows that VA physician opined that
kidney disorder or a renal mass. The examiner added that review of medical
The VA physician further identified risk factors for kidney cancer, to incl
are more likely to be smokers and are more likely to be exposed to cancer-c
chemicals at work, which may account for some of the difference), and race.
The Board finds that the opinion of the VA physician is not adequate as it
Thereafter, the AOJ should attempt to obtain any additional evidence for wh
The actions identified herein are consistent with the duties imposed by the
Accordingly, this matter is hereby REMANDED for the following action:
1.
2.
Send to the Veteran and his representative a letter requesting that the
Clearly explain to the Veteran that he had a full one-year period to respon
3.
4.
After all records and/or responses received from each contacted entity
In addressing the above, the examiner must consider and discuss all in- and
All examination findings/testing results (if any), along with complete, cle
5.
To help avoid future remand, ensure that all requested actions have bee
6.
7.
The purpose of this REMAND is to afford due process and to accomplish addit
This REMAND must be afforded expeditious treatment. The law requires that
action must be handled in an expeditious manner. See 38 U.S.C.A. 5109
______________________________________________
JACQUELINE E. MONROE
Veterans Law Judge, Board of Veterans' Appeals
Department of Veterans Affairs