UCM 60202U2 ASSESSMENT BRIEF

VIDEO DOCUMENTARY (GROUP ASSESSMENT)

Students are to come out with a video based on the topic related to Quantity Survey or
Architecture in a creative manner. The duration of the video clip should be kept within 3 5
minutes. The students are also expected to incorporate Taylors University (TU) branding in
creative ways.
The assessment marks will be shared by all group members for Peer Review (10%) as well as
Lecturer Review (10%).

Marks Allocated (20%)

1. Students are required to present the content from a streaming platform (Youtube,

Dailymotion, Vimeo, etc).

2. Submission of link to your Lecturer needs to be done before or latest by 7th

November 2016 (Monday). 10% of the assessment is by your lecturer and 10% will
be by peer review. The videos will be played in class in week 10 for assessment by
peer review.
3. Each group should consist of 4-5 members only.
Each Video Documentary should include:
1. A confirmed unique topic with your Lecturer.
2. Use of suitable caption/ images/ audio/video to assist with creating the appropriate
atmosphere
3. Subtitles (i.e. script in English) embedded in the video
4. Members introduction (stated or mentioned name and ID number) at the end of the video.
5. At least five (5) resources from Taylors Library or from other credible sources and to be
listed and acknowledged at the end of the video.
6. The presentation order would be announced between Week 8 and Week 9 on TiMES.

Important Dates
1) Week 3 (19th 23rd September 2016)
Submission of Video Documentary Topic and Group Members Name

2) 7 November 2016 (Monday) Submission of Video Documentary Link via email

FauziatulAlma.AbdulRahman@taylors.edu.my
th

3) 9th 10th & 11th November 2016 - Peer Review for Video Documentary

Video Documentary Marking Rubric:

Criteria

Good (4)

Neutral (3)

Fair (2)

Poor (1)

Presentation -Clear and concise.

Presentation flow is
interesting and
information was not
repetitive or diverted from
the presentation content.

-Clear and concise.

Presentation of information
was slightly repetitive and
sometimes diverted from
the presentation content.

-Content was somewhat

clear but requires some
explanation for clarity.

- Content was explained

but requires a lot of
explanation for clarity.

-Presentation does not

show any knowledge of
the topic selected

- All referred contents are

conformed to the 5
Criteria of Evaluating
Resources.

-Most of the referred

contents are conformed to
the 5 Criteria of Evaluating
Resources.

- Less than half of the

referred contents are
conformed to the 5
Criteria of Evaluating
Resources.

- Barely any referred

contents are conformed
to the 5 Criteria of
Evaluating Resources.

- None of the referred

contents are conformed
to the 5 Criteria of
Evaluating Resources.

- All referred content are

listed and acknowledged
at the end of the video.

-Most referred content are

listed and acknowledged at
the end of the video.

- Barely any of the

referred contents are
listed and acknowledged
at the end of the video.

- None of the referred

contents are listed and
acknowledged at the
end of the video.

Referred
Content

Excellent (5)

- Less than half of the

referred contents are listed
and acknowledged at the
end of the video.

Score

Presentation -All expected components

are present, clearly laid
Aid
out, and easy to follow in
the absence of the
presenter.

-All components are

present, but layout is
crowded or confusing to
follow in absence of
presenter.

-Most expected
components are present,
but layout is confusing to
follow in the absence of
the presenter.

-Some expected
components are present,
but layout is untidy and
confusing to follow in the
absence of the presenter.

-Text is concise, free of

spelling or typographical
errors; background is
unobtrusive.

-Text is relatively clear,

mostly free of spelling and
typographical errors;
background is unobtrusive.

-Text is relatively clear,

but some spelling and
typographical errors;
background may be
distracting.

-Figures and tables are

appropriate and labelled
correctly.

-Most figures and tables are

appropriate and labelled
-Figures and tables not
correctly.
always related to text, or
are not appropriate, or
poorly labelled.

-Text is hard to read due

to font size or color,
some spelling and
typographical errors;
background may be
distracting.

- Photographs
/tables/graphs /Audio/
video improves
understanding and
enhances visual appeal.

-Photographs/ tables/graphs
/Audio/ video improve
understanding

-Photographs/
tables/graphs /Audio/
video were limited and do
not improve
understanding.

-Some of the expected

components are present,
but poorly laid out and
confusing to follow in
the absence of the
presenter.
-Text hard to read,
messy and contains
multiple spelling and
typographical errors;
very poor background.

-Figures and tables not

related to text, or are not
appropriate, or poorly
labelled.

-Figures and tables

poorly done.

-Photographs/
tables/graphs /Audio/
video limited and do not
improve understanding.

-Visual aids not used.

Total score

Marking calculations: Total score/15 x 20 = Percentage gained out of 20 %