Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SCIENCE AND
TECHNOLOGY
Composites Science and Technology 65 (2005) 659667
www.elsevier.com/locate/compscitech
b,*
, H. Sekine
Departement of Advanced Energy, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Mailbox 302, 5-1-5, Kashiwanoha,
Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8561, Japan
b
Department of Aeronautics and Space Engineering, Tohoku University, Aoba-yama 01, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8579, Japan
Received 2 March 2004; accepted 22 September 2004
Available online 21 November 2004
Abstract
We propose a new approach to predicting multiple damage states in composite laminates using embedded ber Bragg grating
(FBG) sensors. FBG sensors are sensitive to a non-uniform strain distribution along their longitudinal direction, and the eects
appear in the power spectrum of the reected light from the gage section. In this paper, we propose a numerical model to predict
both the damage process of the laminate and the change of the reection spectrum from the FBG sensor. The proposed approach is
then applied to explain the results of a quasi-static tensile test for a notched CFRP cross-ply laminate with an embedded FBG sensor. The results demonstrate that the proposed approach is useful for predicting multiple damage states in composite laminates.
2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: A. Smart materials; FBG sensor; C. Finite element analysis; C. Notch
1. Introduction
Structural health monitoring has recently been
attracting much attention for enhancing structural
integrity or validity [1]. Sensing technologies that integrate sensing ability into structures have also been investigated. Among various sensors for intelligent structure
systems, optical ber sensors have excellent features like
small size, high sensitivity and no electric/magnetic
induction. Therefore, many attempts to detect internal
damages have been conducted using various types of
optical ber sensors [2].
Fiber Bragg grating (FBG) sensors have the greatest
advantages such as high-accuracy and multiplexing
capability. FBG sensors have already been adopted
to measure strain or temperature in various civil struc*
0266-3538/$ - see front matter 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.09.022
660
2. Analysis
This paper investigates notched CFRP cross-ply laminates, where multiple damages may easily occur. We
propose a numerical approach to calculate the reection
spectrum of the FBG sensor embedded in the composite
0o layer
(a)
90 layer
Optical fiber
(line element)
y = 6.3
z
y
0 layer
Cohesive elements
for splits
y = 4.5
Cohesive elements
for delamination
Cohesive elements
for delamination
(c)
Double node
10.5
w
15
(b)
Notch tip
y = 4.5 Notch
90 layer
0
4-node Mindlin
Cohesive elements plate element
for transverse cracks
Traction force
u
(d)
Mindlin element
Fig. 1. Layer-wise nite element model of the notched cross-ply laminate with an embedded optical ber: (a) schematic, (b) overview of the mesh, (c)
magnied view near the notch, and (d) cohesive element. The optical ber is built into this model by line elements. The cohesive elements for splits
and transverse cracks are also depicted in this gure. Cohesive elements are required to link these two layers and to represent delamination.
dB
ijB exp2iux;
dx
2p
p
neff :
k
K
3
4
b i
9
n30
fp mf p11 p12 gef :
2 12
10
3. Experiment
661
7
8
662
10
21
1.8
4.5
50
1.0
Fig. 2. Dimensions of the double-edge-notched (DEN) specimen. The stacking conguration was cross-ply [02/902]s. The FBG sensor was embedded
1.8 mm apart from the notch tip.
4. Simulations
4.1. Damage state of the laminate
We correlated the proposed approach with the experimental results using the DEN model shown in Fig. 1.
663
Fig. 5. Typical damage extension of the [02/902]s DEN specimen. The pictures on the left are the soft X-rays used in the experiment, and the right
gures are the simulated results obtained in the damage analysis. Both in the experiment and in the simulation, splits and transverse cracks are
observed at lower strain; delaminations occur at the notch tips as the load increases.
664
Normalized intensity
Simulation
0.5
0.25
0
1547 1548 1549 1550 1551 1552
Wavelength, nm
Stress free
0.75
0.75
0.5
0.25
(b)
0
1550 1551 1552 1553 1554 1555
Wavelength, nm
0.21 %
(c)
0.5
0.25
0
1552 1553 1554 1555 1556 1557
Wavelength, nm
0.35 %
0.75
0.75
0.5
0.25
(d)
0
1553 1554 1555 1556 1557 1558
Wavelength, nm
0.45 %
Normalized intensity
Normalized intensity
Experiment
Normalized intensity
Normalized intensity
(a)
0.75
(e)
0.5
0.25
0
1555 1556 1557 1558 1559 1560
Wavelength, nm
0.57 %
Fig. 6. Spectra of the FBG sensor embedded in the DEN specimen measured in the experiment (black lines) or simulated by the proposed approach
(gray lines). Each strain level corresponds to one indicated in Fig. 5. The reection spectrum became broadband and had some peaks when initial
damages occurred, and then a high peak appeared at a longer wavelength when the ply interfaces were delaminated.
148
9.57
4.50
3.5
0.356
0.49
0.6
36.0
Optical ber
Youngs modulus of glass (GPa)
Youngs modulus of coating (GPa)
Thermal expansion coecient of glass (106/K)
Thermal expansion coecient of coating (106/K)
73.1
1.47
0.5
60
665
nation appears within the gage length, high peaks appear in the longer wavelength as shown in Figs. 6(d)
and (e), because longitudinal strain is high in the delaminated region.
These results suggest that the FBG sensor should be
embedded at the position where the longitudinal strain
reacts to each damage in order to distinguish damage
types and to identify the degree of damage. Splits cause
strong stress concentration at their tips, and the FBG
sensor detects the split tip if the damage is close to the
sensor. We detected the transverse cracks as disturbed
peaks in the reection spectrum by embedding the
FBG sensor near the 90 plies.
5. Discussion
Table 2
Parameters of the optical ber and the FBG sensor used to calculate
the reection spectrum
Gage length (mm)
Initial center wavelength k0 (nm)
Initial refractive index of the core n0
Strain-optic coecients p11
Strain-optic coecients p12
10
1549.40
1.4490
0.113
0.252
The strain-optic coecients p11 and p12 are quoted from [15].
Table 3
Parameters for cohesive elements used in the analysis
For splits and transverse cracks
In-plane tensile strength (Mode I, MPa)
In-plane shear strength (Mode II, MPa)
Out-of-plane shear strength (Mode III, MPa)
Energy release rate (Mode I, J/m2)
Energy release rate (Modes II and III, J/m2)
83.7
100
100
340
400
For delamination
Strength for delamination (all modes, MPa)
Energy release rate (all modes, J/m2)
40
450
In this section, we discuss the eects of the three damage states on the reection spectrum with respect to the
following four cases: (a) without damage, (b) with splits
only, (c) with transverse cracks only, and (d) with
delamination only.
Fig. 7 depicts continuous changes in the simulated
reection spectrum for varying amounts of damage. In
all cases, the reection spectrum shifts to the longer
wavelength as the load and damages increase. In Fig.
7(a), the reection spectrum becomes broad due to the
stress concentration of the notch tip, although no damage occurs. Fig. 7(b) depicts the reection spectrum with
respect to the length of splits. The spectrum at each given split length is similar to the one of no damage. This
implies that the splits have little eect on the spectrum as
long as the FBG sensor is embedded at the current position (1.8 mm apart from the notch tip). In contrast, as
shown in Fig. 7(c), transverse cracks signicantly aect
in the spectrum. Although the whole spectrum shape is
always similar to the spectrum shape from an undamaged specimen, the shape of each peak changes when a
new crack occurs. When delamination occurs, the spectrum shape is distorted as the delaminated area grows.
We can roughly divide these spectra into two large
peaks, and the peak at the longer wavelength becomes
larger as the delamination extends, as shown in Fig.
7(d).
Fig. 8 compares the strain distributions of the FBG
sensor for these four cases at 0.5% applied strain. The
strain is distributed gradually when only splits occur
and is similar to the strain distribution for an undamaged sample, possibly because the FBG sensor is far
from the splits. Therefore, the spectra of these two are
almost the same. Since transverse cracks cause local
strain disturbance, the spectrum shape of each peak
changes but the rough shape is still similar to that of a
sample with no damage. On the other hand, the strain
distribution changes rapidly when the delamination occurs near the FBG sensor. A high peak at the longer
0.75
0.75
Intensity
Intensity
666
0.5
0.25
0.25
0
0
0.2
dens
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
1546
(a)
1548
1550
1556
1552 1554
Wavelength, nm
1558
1560
/c
ity,
in, %
Stra
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
1546
(c)
k
Crac
0.1
0.75
0.75
Intensity
Intensity
0.5
0.5
0.25
0
Dela
ated
1556
1552 1554
Wavelength, nm
1558
1560
(b)
1550
1558
1560
15
, mm
10
1548
1556
1552 1554
Wavelength, nm
10
area
th, m
leng
12
1546
1550
min
tting
Spli
1548
0.5
0.25
1560
1550
1556
1552 1554
Wavelength, nm
1558
1548
(d)
20
1546
Fig. 7. Comparison of the continuous changes of the reection spectrum related to the amount of damages for the cases of: (a) no damage, (b) splits
only, (c) transverse cracks only, and (d) delamination.
0.65
Strain, %
0.6
0.55
0.5
6. Conclusions
0.45
0.4
0
2.5
5
7.5
Position, mm
10
2. An optical analysis to calculate the reection spectrum of the FBG sensor is directly connected with
the damage analysis mentioned above. The direct
linkage enables us to calculate the reection spectrum
of the embedded FBG sensor considering the damage
process of the laminate.
3. A quasi-static tensile test was performed for a CFRP
cross-ply laminate with an embedded FBG sensor
with notches on both edges. We conrmed that the
proposed approach could explain the damage process
and the changes in the reection spectrum.
4. The eects of three types of damages on the reection
spectrum of the embedded FBG sensor were studied
using the proposed approach. We found that the
reection spectrum was strongly correlated with the
longitudinal strain distribution of the FBG sensor.
Transverse cracks (delamination) corresponded to
disturbed peaks (a high peak at longer wavelength).
These phenomena were observed in the experiment
when the all damages occurred simultaneously, and
the change in the reection spectra was accurately
predicted by the proposed approach.
Acknowledgments
This work was performed as a part of the project of
Civil Aviation Fundamental Technology Program-Advanced Materials & Process Development for Next Generation Aircraft Structures under the contract of
NEDO (New Energy and industrial Technology Development Organization) founded by METI (Ministry of
Economy, Trade and Industry), Japan. T.O. acknowledges the support by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan under
Grants-in-Aid for Scientic Research (No. 14750078).
One of the authors S.Y. was also supported through
the 21st Century COE Program, Mechanical System
Innovation, by the Ministry of Education, Culture,
Sports, Science and Technology. The authors thank
Mr. M. Nishikawa (The University of Tokyo) for cooperation in the experiment, and also Mr. T. Mizutani
667
References
[1] Tajima N, Sakurai T, Sasajima M, Takeda N, Kishi T. Overview
of demonstrator program of Japanese Smart Material and
Structure System project. Proceedings of smart structures and
materials, 5054. San Diego: SPIE; 2003. p. 16574.
[2] Zhou G, Sim LM. Damage detection and assessment in berreinforced composite structures with embedded bre optic
sensors-review. Smart Mater Struct 2002;11:92539.
[3] Kersey AD, Davis MA, Berko TA, Bellemore DG, Koo KP,
Jones RT. Progress towards the developement of practical ber
Bragg grating instrumentation systems. Proceedings of ber optic
and laser sensors XIV, 2839. Denver (CO): SPIE; 1996. p. 124.
[4] Kersey AD, Davis MA, Patrick HJ, LeBlanc M, Koo KP, Askins
CG, et al. Fiber grating sensors. J Lightwave Technol
1997;15(8):144263.
[5] Okabe Y, Yashiro S, Kosaka T, Takeda N. Detection of
transverse cracks in CFRP composites using embedded ber
Bragg grating sensors. Smart Mater Struct 2000;9:8328.
[6] Takeda S, Okabe Y, Takeda N. Delamination detection in CFRP
laminates with embedded small-diameter ber Bragg grating
sensors. Composites A 2002;33(7):97180.
[7] Kortschot MT, Beaumont PWR. Damage mechanics of composite materials. I. Measurements of damage and strength. Compos
Sci Technol 1990;39(4):289301.
[8] Kortschot MT, Beaumont PWR. Damage mechanics of composite materials. II. A damaged-based notched strength model.
Compos Sci Technol 1990;39(4):30326.
[9] Chang KY, Liu S, Chang FK. Damage tolerance of laminated
composites containing an open hole and subjected to tensile
loadings. J Compos Mater 1991;25:274301.
[10] Kamiya S, Sekine H. Prediction of the fracture strength of
notched continuous ber-reinforced laminates by interlaminar
crack extension analysis. Compos Sci Technol 1996;56(1):1121.
[11] Geubelle PH, Baylor JS. Impact-induced delamination of composites: a 2D simulation. Composites B 1998;29(5):589602.
[12] Owen DRJ, Hinton E. Finite elements in plasticity. Swansea: Pineridge Press; 1980.
[13] Van Steenkiste RJ, Springer GS. Strain and temperature measurement with ber optic sensors. Lancaster (PA): Technomic
Publication; 1997.
[14] Huang S, LeBlanc M, Ohn MM, Measures RM. Bragg intragrating structural sensing. Appl Opt 1995;34(22):50039.
[15] Bertholds A, Dandliker R. Determination of the individual strainoptic coecients in single-mode optical bers. J Lightwave
Technol 1988;6(1):1720.