[Type text]

Trial Date: Sept 20, 2016

Time of Case:9:20 am
General Impression: the lawyers appearing were brilliant and
witty as can be perceived by their appearance
Punctuality: The Judge and the Prosecutors were on time as well
as Counsels
Kinds of Clothing: Male lawyers appearing wear long sleeves
paired with black pants and shoes, others wear a tie while ladies
wear executive dress.
Best interest of client: Conduct of cross examination
Case Presented:
People vs Tan
Presentation of First prosecution witness
The case is called for an initial trial in violation of Section 5 of RA
9165
Procedure: RULE 119 Trial Criminal Procedure
Convincing Argument : The prosecution established the validity
of arrest against Tan
Prompt and Proper Objection: The defense objected the
validity of the arrest since it was not made immediately thereafter
the transaction between Tan and the poseur-buyer
Definite Legal Theory: The prosecution or the trial lawyer
established its legal theory during the examination of its witness
Others:
Jurisprudence cited, if any:

[Type text]

Trial Date: Sept. 21, 2016

Time of Case:9:20 am
General Impression: the lawyers appearing were brilliant and
witty as can be perceived by their appearance
Punctuality: The Judge and the Prosecutors were on time as well
as Counsels
Kinds of Clothing: Male lawyers appearing wear long sleeves
paired with black pants and shoes while ladies wear executive
dress
Best interest of client: The court rendered decision acquitting
the accused for violation of Section 11 of RA 9165. However, he
has another case pending before him in the other trial court
Case Presented:
People vs Estoce
Final Judgment Rendered
Convincing Argument :
Prompt and Proper Objection:
Definite Legal Theory:
Others: The court rendered its judgment by reading the
dispositive potion, thereof. In case the judgment is acquittal it
shall state whether the evidence of the prosecution absolutely
failed to proved the guilt of the accused or merely failed to proved
his guilt.
Others:

[Type text]

Jurisprudence cited, if any:

Trial Date: Sept. 22, 2016
Time of Case:9:20 am
General Impression: the lawyers appearing were brilliant and
witty as can be perceived by their appearance
Punctuality: The Judge and the Prosecutors were on time as well
as Counsels
Kinds of Clothing: Male lawyers appearing wear long sleeves
paired with black pants and shoes while ladies wear executive
dress
Best interest of client: conduct of cross examination by
defense counsel
Case Presented: People vs Decasa
3rd prosecution witness
Convincing Argument : The prosecution established the events
of the arrest of the accused by the conduct of buy-bust operation
against him.
Prompt and Proper Objection: In the cross examination, the
defense manifested that the police officers cannot done the
handling and inventory of seized drugs within a simultaneous
time
Definite Legal Theory: The prosecution or the trial lawyer
established its legal theory during the examination of
prosecutions witness
Others: Defense counsel moved to finished his cross examination
in the next trial since he didnt bring his document papers about
the case and he made to write his questions on his hand which

[Type text]

was not enough. Meanwhile, the judge offered him a piece of

paper but he refused to accept it and continue because he is not
feeling well because of his runny nose. The judge granted the
counsels motion, that the counsel is not feeling well but he is paid
well.
Others:
Jurisprudence cited, if any:
Trial Date: Sept. 23, 2016
Time of Case:9:30 am
General Impression: the lawyers appearing were brilliant and
witty as can be perceived by their appearance
Punctuality: The Judge and the Prosecutors were on time as well
as Counsels
Kinds of Clothing: Male lawyers appearing wear long sleeves
paired with black pants and shoes while ladies wear executive
dress
Best interest of client: conduct of cross examination by
defense counsel
Case Presented:
People vs Sarabia
nd
2 prosecution witness
Convincing Argument : The defense counsel established the
facts and events which leads to the arrest of the accused during a
checkpoint conducted by the police officers which lead to the
seizure of a gun and ammunitions as well as suspected drugs
from him
Prompt and Proper Objection: The prosecution objected the
questions on the other matters which were incompetent due to
lack of capacity to answer the questions

[Type text]

Definite Legal Theory: The defense legal theory was made

during the cross examination of the police officer who arrested
the accused
Others:
Jurisprudence cited, if any:

Trial Date: Sept. 26, 2016

Time of Case:9:10 am
General Impression: the lawyers appearing were brilliant and
witty as can be perceived by their appearance
Punctuality: The Judge and the Prosecutors were on time as well
as Counsels
Kinds of Clothing: Male lawyers appearing wear long sleeves
paired with black pants and shoes while ladies wear executive
dress
Best interest of client: personal testimony of the accused as
witness
Case Presented: People vs Jumamil
Accused as witness
Convincing Argument : The accused narrated the facts and
events on which he was being arrested at the place of restaurant

[Type text]

inside a hut. He stated he not connected with the other accused

who were the subjects of the raid
Prompt and Proper Objection: The prosecution objected that
the said accused, was together with the other accused and hes
known by them when he was arrested
Definite Legal Theory: The defense legal theory was made
during examination of the accused as witness
Others: The defense manifest during the examination of the
accused that he was not one of the subject of the raiding team
and the fact that he did not know them. His presence in the area
was because he was a regular customer

Trial Date: Sept. 27, 2016

Time of Case:10:10 am
General Impression: the lawyers appearing were brilliant and
witty as can be perceived by their appearance
Punctuality: The Judge and the Prosecutors were on time as well
as Counsels
Kinds of Clothing: Male lawyers appearing wear long sleeves
paired with black pants and shoes while ladies wear executive
dress
Best interest of client: The counsel manifest that the accused
will immediately confined to a penal institution after he pleaded
guilty for lesser offense for the violation of Sec 3, RA 9287 in
order to serve his sentence
Case Presented: People vs Villegas

[Type text]

Convincing Argument : None

Prompt and Proper Objection:
Definite Legal Theory:
Others: During the entered plea of the accused the judge ask
him, that the court a quo will directly render judgment against
him and that he understood the same. In addition hes being
explained by his good counsel.
Jurisprudence cited, if any:

Trial Date: Sept. 28, 2016

Time of Case:9:10 am
General Impression: the lawyers appearing were brilliant and
witty as can be perceived by their appearance
Punctuality: The Judge and the Prosecutors were on time as well
as Counsels
Kinds of Clothing: Male lawyers appearing wear long sleeves
paired with black pants and shoes while ladies wear executive
dress
Best interest of client: The accused was arraign and pleaded
not guilty of the offense charged against him for violation of
Section 12 and 13 of RA 9165

[Type text]

Case Presented: People vs Basalo

Arraignment
Convincing Argument : None
Prompt and Proper Objection:
Definite Legal Theory:
Others: The court calls the case. The court interpreter reads the
caption of the case. Bothe prosecution and counsel make
appearances. Judge arraign the accused, the court interpreter
read the information to the accused in a local dialect. The Judge
ask him if he was the same person appearing ion the record, that
he understand the information filed against him, and also what is
his plea. His plea is entered in the record that the accused plead
not guilty
Jurisprudence cited, if any:

Trial Date: Sept. 29, 2016

Time of Case:9:30 am
General Impression: the lawyers appearing were brilliant and
witty as can be perceived by their appearance
Punctuality: The Judge and the Prosecutors were on time as well
as Counsels
Kinds of Clothing: Male lawyers appearing wear long sleeves
paired with black pants and shoes while ladies wear executive
dress

[Type text]

Best interest of client: the conduct of cross examination

Case Presented: People vs Crucia
2nd prosecution witness
Convincing Argument : The prosecution established the facts
which leads to the arrest of the accused. As the arresting officers
had a warrant of arrest against him. However, said accused
attempted to escaped and fired his gun against the officers but he
was eventually caught by them
Prompt and Proper Objection: No further objections made
Definite Legal Theory: The prosecution established their theory
in the direct examination of the police witness
Others:

Jurisprudence cited, if any:

Trial Date: Sept. 29, 2016
Time of Case:9:30 am
General Impression: the lawyers appearing were brilliant and
witty as can be perceived by their appearance
Punctuality: The Judge and the Prosecutors were on time as well
as Counsels
Kinds of Clothing: Male lawyers appearing wear long sleeves
paired with black pants and shoes while ladies wear executive
dress
Best interest of client: the conduct of cross examination

[Type text]

Case Presented: People v Tan

2nd prosecution witness
Convincing Argument : the prosecution established how was
the arrest conducted
Prompt and Proper Objection: The defense questioned the
conduct of the transaction of why the accused was not arrested
immediately after the consummation of the sale of the drugs, but
called and waited for the assistance of the other officers
Definite Legal Theory: The prosecution established it in the
examination of its witness. The arrest cannot be immediately
done since there was another person inside the room occupied by
the accused without endangering his limb.
Others:
Jurisprudence cited, if any: