Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
Division of Iloilo
District Of Santa Barbara
BINANGKILAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
BINANGKILAN STA. BARBARA, ILOILO
INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF)
Name of Employee:
Position:
SUPERINTENDENT
Review Period:
Division:

MARY ANN B. CASTOR

TEACHER I

Name of Rater:
Position:

JUNE 2016- SEPT.2016

ILOILO

Date of Review: MARCH 2017

MFOs

KRAs

OBJECTIVES

TIMELINE

To achieve quality
of education
in
the elementary

A. TeachingLearning
Process

1
.Initiate
discipline 80% of
23 pupil including
classroom
rules,
guidelines
and
individual
and
group tasks.

June 20162016
September

WEIGHT
PER KRA

LILIBETH T. ESTOQUE, Ed, D

ASSISTANT
SCHOOLS

PERFORMANCE
INDICATORS
(Quality, Efficiency,
Timelines)

ACTUAL
RESULTS
PAST

WEIGHT
PER
OBJECTIVE

RATING

40%

1 .Initiated discipline 80%

of
23
pupil
including
classroom rules, guidelines
and individual and group
tasks.
5- 95%-100%
4-85%-94%
3-75%-84%
2- 50%-74%
1-50% below

20%

DIVISION

SCORE

AV
E

MFOs

KRAs

OBJECTIVES

TIMELINE

WEIGHT
PER
KRA

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
(Quality, Efficiency,
Timelines

ACTUAL
RESULT
S
PAST

WEIGHT
PER
OBJECTIV
E

RATING

2. Prepare 80
lesson plans and
daily logs of
activities including
appropriate,
adequate and
updated
instructional
materials.

June 2016Septembe
r
2016

3. Initiate
discipline to 5%
out of 85% multigrade pupils
including
classroom rules,
guidelines and
individual group
tasks every
grading period

June 2016Septembe
r2016

2. Prepared lesson plans and

daily logs of activities
including appropriate,
adequate and updated
instructional materials.
5-accomplished all of the
following tasks above
within the timeline.
4 - accomplished any four
of tasks above within the
timeline.
3 - accomplished any
three of tasks above
within the timeline.
2 - accomplished any
two or of tasks above
within the timeline.
1 accomplished any one
of tasks above within the
timeline.
Initiated discipline to 5% out
of 85% multi-grade pupils
including classroom rules,
guidelines asks every
grading period.
5- 95%-100% of pupils

10%

10%

SCORE

AV
E

MFOs

KRAs

OBJECTIVES

TIMELINE

WEIGHT
PER
KRA

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
(Quality, Efficiency,
Timelines

ACTUAL
RESULT
S
PAST

WEIGHT
PER
OBJECTIV
E

RATING

SCORE

ACTUAL
RESULT
S
PAST

WEIGHT
PER
OBJECTIV
E

RATING

SCORE

display desirable values

and attitude towards
their studies as evidence
by their compliance to set
rules and responsibilities.
4- 85%-94%
3- 75%- 84%Moni
2- 50%- 74%
1-50% below
MFOs

KRAs

OBJECTIVES

B.
Pupils/
Students
Outcomes

1. Conduct 5% out
of
70
%
remediation
activities
to
identified
slow
learners and non
readers.

TIMELINE

WEIGHT
PER
KRA

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
(Quality, Efficiency,
Timelines)

Conducted 5% out of 70 %
mediation
activities
to
identified slow learners and
non- readers.
5- 91%-100% remediation or
enrichment
activities
identified slow learners and
non- readers.
4- 81%-90%
3- 71%-80%
2- 61%-70%
1 50% below accomplished

June
2016Septembe
r 2016

30

Monitored and evaluated 7

10%

AV
E

MFOs

KRAs

OBJECTIVES

TIMELINE

2. Monitor and
evaluate 7 out of
23
Students
progress of Multigrade
class
in
every
grading
period.

June
2016Setember
2016

3. Maintain 75%
updated
pupils/students
records
every
periodic test/ pretest/post-test.

MFOs

KRAs

OBJECTIVES

WEIGHT
PER
KRA

ACTUAL
RESULT
S
PAST

out of 23 Students progress

of Multi-grade class in every
grading period.
5- all indicators provided with
evidence
4- lacked 1 indicator
3 lacked 2 indicator
2 lacked 3 indicator
1 lacked all indicator

WEIGHT
PER
OBJECTIV
E

RATING

SCORE

RATING

SCOR
E

20%

Maintained
75%
updated
pupils/students records every
periodic test/pre-test /posttest.

June
2016October
2016

TIMELINE

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
(Quality, Efficiency,
Timelines)

WEIGHT
PER
KRA

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
(Quality, Efficiency,
Timelines

ACTUAL
RESULT
S
PAST

WEIGHT
PER
OBJECTIV
E
Q

AVE

MFOs

KRAs

OBJECTIVES

TIMELINE

C. Community
Involvement

1. Conduct at
least 2 home
visitations to
parents of pupils
needing academic
monitoring /
follow up.

June 2016September
2016

WEIGHT
PER
KRA

30%

2 .Undertake /
initiated at least 2
projects/ with
external funding /
sponsorship/gradi
ng period opening
classes-projects. .

June 2016September
2016

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
(Quality, Efficiency,
Timelines

Conducted at least 2 home

visitation to parents of pupils
needing
academic
monitoring / follow up.
5 Accomplished all of the
following tasks within the
timeline.
4 Accomplished any four of
the following tasks within the
timeline.
3 - Accomplished any three
of the following tasks within
the timeline.
2 - Accomplished any two of
the following tasks within the
timeline.
1 - Accomplished any one of
the none of the tasks above.
Undertaken / initiated at
least 2 projects/with external
funding /
sponsorship/grading period
opening classes projects.

ACTUAL
RESULT
S
PAST

WEIGHT
PER
OBJECTIV
E

10%

10%

RATING

SCOR
E

MFOs

KRAs

OBJECTIVES

TIMELINE

WEIGHT
PER
KRA

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
(Quality, Efficiency,
Timelines

ACTUAL
RESULT
S
PAST

WEIGHT
PER
OBJECTIV
E

RATING

3. Conduct at least 2

regular / periodic
PTA meetings

June 2016September
2016

Conducted at least regular / periodic

PTA meetings.
5 81% - 95%
4 66% - 80%
3 51% - 65%
2 35% - 50%
1 49% or less

SCOR
E
AVE

10%

OVER AL RATING FOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS

Adjectival Rating

VS