Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Biotechnology Advances
j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e : w w w. e l s e v i e r. c o m / l o c a t e / b i o t e c h a d v
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 24 December 2007
Received in revised form 19 August 2008
Accepted 21 August 2008
Available online 27 August 2008
Keywords:
Cleaner production
Palm oil mill efuent (POME)
Waste reusability
Fermentation substrate
Fertilizer
Animal feeds
a b s t r a c t
During the last century, a great deal of research and development as well as applications has been devoted to
waste. These include waste minimization and treatment, the environmental assessment of waste,
minimization of environmental impact, life cycle assessment and others. The major reason for such huge
efforts is that waste generation constitutes one of the major environmental problems where production
industries are concerned. Until now, an increasing pressure has been put on nding methods of reusing
waste, for instance through cleaner production, thus mirroring rapid changes in environmental policies. The
palm oil industry is one of the leading industries in Malaysia with a yearly production of more than
13 million tons of crude palm oil and plantations covering 11% of the Malaysian land area. However, the
production of such amounts of crude palm oil result in even larger amounts of palm oil mill efuent (POME),
estimated at nearly three times the quantity of crude palm oil. Normally, POME is treated using end-of-pipe
processes, but it is worth considering the potential value of POME prior to its treatment through introduction
of a cleaner production. It is envisaged that POME can be sustainably reused as a fermentation substrate in
the production of various metabolites, fertilizers and animal feeds through biotechnological advances. The
present paper thus discusses various technically feasible and economically benecial means of transforming
the POME into low or preferably high value added products.
2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Contents
1.
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.1.
A brief glance at palm oil mill efuent (POME) . . . . . . . . . . .
1.2.
Cleaner production as a sustainable strategy for POME management
2.
POME as a reusable product . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.
Biotechnological advances in the sustainable reuse of POME. . . . . . . .
3.1.
Sustainable reuse of POME as fermentation media . . . . . . . . .
3.1.1.
Antibiotics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.1.2.
Bioinsecticides . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.1.3.
Solvents (acetonebutanolethanol: ABE) . . . . . . . . .
3.1.4.
Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.1.5.
Organic acids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.1.6.
Enzymes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.1.7.
Hydrogen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.2.
Sustainable reuse of POME as fertilizer . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.3.
Sustainable reuse of POME as live food for animals and aquacultural
4.
Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . .
organisms
. . . . .
. . . . .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
41
41
41
42
45
45
45
45
45
46
46
47
47
48
49
50
50
Corresponding author.
E-mail addresses: tayeong@hotmail.com (T.Y. Wu), wahabm@vlsi.eng.ukm.my, wahabm@yahoo.com (A.W. Mohammad), jamal@eng.ukm.my (J.M. Jahim), drnurina@eng.ukm.my
(N. Anuar).
0734-9750/$ see front matter 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.08.005
41
1. Introduction
1.1. A brief glance at palm oil mill efuent (POME)
The Malaysian palm oil industry has grown rapidly over the years
and Malaysia has become the world's largest producer and exporter of
palm oil and its products. In 2003, more than 3.79 million hectares of
land were under oil palm cultivation, occupying more than one-third
of the total cultivated area in Malaysia and 11% of the total land area
(Yusoff and Hansen, 2007). In total, the palm oil industry contributes
signicantly towards the country's foreign exchange earnings and the
increased standard living among Malaysians.
In general, the palm oil milling process can be categorized into a dry
and a wet (standard) process. The wet process of palm oil milling is the
most common and typical way of extracting palm oil, especially in
Malaysia. It is estimated that for each ton of crude palm oil that is
produced, 57.5 t of water are required, and more than 50% of this water
ends up as palm oil mill efuent (POME) (Ahmad et al., 2003). Raw POME
is a colloidal suspension containing 9596% water, 0.60.7% oil and 45%
total solids. Included in the total solids are 24% suspended solids, which
are mainly constituted of debris from palm fruit mesocarp generated
from three main sources, i.e. sterilizer condensate, separator sludge and
hydrocyclone wastewater (Borja and Banks, 1994; Khalid and Wan
Mustafa, 1992; Ma, 2000). If the untreated efuent is discharged into
watercourses, it is certain to cause considerable environmental
problems (Davis and Reilly, 1980) due to its high biochemical oxygen
demand (25,000 mg/l), chemical oxygen demand (53,630 mg/l), oil and
grease (8370 mg/l), total solids (43,635 mg/l) and suspended solids
(19,020 mg/l) (Ma, 1995). The palm oil mill industry in Malaysia has thus
been identied as the one discharging the largest pollution load into the
rivers throughout the country (Hwang et al., 1978).
Ponding system is the most conventional method for treating POME
(Ma and Ong, 1985; Khalid and Wan Mustafa, 1992) but other processes
such as aerobic and anaerobic digestions, physicochemical treatments
and membrane ltration may also provide the palm oil industries with a
possible insight into the improvement of current POME treatment
process. However, the treatment that is based mainly on biological
treatments of anaerobic and aerobic systems, is quite inefcient to treat
POME, which unfortunately leads to environmental pollution issues
(Ahmad et al., 2005). This is because the high BOD loading and low pH of
POME, together with the colloidal nature of the suspended solids, render
Table 1
The approximate composition (%) of major constituents, amino acids, fatty acids and minerals in raw POME (adapted from Habib et al., 1997)
Major constituents
Composition (%)
Amino acids
Composition (%)
Fatty acids
Composition (%)
Minerals
Moisture
Crude protein
Crude lipid
Ash
Carbohydrate
Nitrogen-free extract
Total carotene
Total
6.99
12.75
10.21
14.88
29.55
26.39
0.019
100.789
Aspartic acid
Glutamic acid
Serine
Glycine
Histidine
Arginine
Threonine
Alanine
Proline
Tyrosine
Phenylalanine
Valine
Methionine
Cystine
Isoleucine
Leucine
Lysine
Tryptophan
Total
9.66
10.88
6.86
9.43
1.43
4.25
2.58
7.70
4.57
3.16
3.20
3.56
6.88
3.37
4.53
4.86
2.66
1.26
90.84
2.37
4.29
3.22
12.66
2.21
22.45
1.39
1.12
10.41
14.54
9.53
4.72
0
3.56
2.04
1.12
0.36
95.99
Fe
Zn
P
Na
Mg
Mn
K
Ca
Co
Cr
Cu
Ni
S
Se
Si
Sn
Al
B
Mo
As
V
Pb
Cd
11.08
17.58
14377.38
94.57
911.95
38.81
8951.55
1650.09
2.40
4.02
10.76
1.31
13.32
12.32
10.50
2.30
16.60
7.60
6.45
9.09
0.12
5.15
0.44
42
Fig. 3. Absorption curves for the rod-like particles after treatment with phenol/
sulphuric acid and for a number of other simple sugars (Ho and Tan, 1983).
Table 2
Various products or metabolites produced in bioprocesses during the reuse of POME or its derivatives as substrates
Product
Microorganism
Penicillin
Penicillium chrysogenum
FR2284
Penicillin
Penicillium chrysogenum
FR2284
Bioinsecticide Bacillus thuringiensis H-14
Fermentation conditions
Fermentation timea
(h)
Maximum production
Reference
72
602 U/ml
Suwandi (1991)
72
715 U/ml
Suwandi (1991)
ABE
ABE
ABE
2.0 10 spores/ml
Suwandi (1991)
36 (for ABE)
ABE
30 (for A) 24 (for
E)
42 (for A) 30 (for
E)
ABE
48 (for ABE)
Masngut et al.
(2006, 2007)
60 (for ABE)
200
4 g/l
N2 g/l
1.8 g/l
65
6.25 g/l
24.24 g/l
24
7.8 g/l
84
1014 g/l
48
0.28 g/l
168
5.2 g/l
120
0.079 g/l
Wu et al. (2005)
ABE
Clostridium acetobutylicum
NCIMB 13357
ABE
Clostridium acetobutylicum
NCIMB 13357
PHA
Rhodobacter sphaeroides
IFO 12203
PHA
Rhodobacter sphaeroides
IFO 12203
Alcaligenes eutrophus H16
(ATCC 17699)
PHA
PHA
Ralstonia eutropha
ATCC 17699
PHA
Mixed cultures
Organic acids
Mixed cultures
Organic acids
Mixed cultures
Citric acid
Aspergillus (A103)
Citric acid
Itaconic acid
ABE
Clostridium acetobutylicum
NCIMB 13357
Immobilized Clostridium
saccharoperbutylacetonicum
N1-4
Clostridium acetobutylicum
NCIMB 13357
Clostridium acetobutylicum
NCIMB 13357
Suwandi (1991)
7.0 10 spores/ml
72
72
43
(continued on next page)
44
Table 2 (continued)
Product
Microorganism
Fermentation conditions
Fermentation timea
(h)
Maximum production
Reference
Cellulase
(CMCase)
72
1.09 U/ml
Prasertsan et al.
(1997)
Cellulase
(CMCase)
Cellulase
(CMCase)
Cellulase
(CMCase)
Cellulase
(CMCase)
Aspergillus niger
51
1.040 U/ml
Trichoderma harzianum
45
1.227 U/ml
45
0.656 U/ml
24
3.495 U/ml
Mashitah
(2002)
Mashitah
(2002)
Mashitah
(2002)
Mashitah
(2002)
Trichoderma harzianum
96
13.44 U/ml
144
33 U/ml
48
12.11 U/ml
96
3.373 U/ml
Chowdhury et al.
(2006)
Laohaprapanon et al.
(2007)
Alam et al. (2006b)
144
5.038 U/ml
20
0.4 U/ml
96
22.77 U/ml
Prasertsan et al.
(1997)
96
0.448 U/ml
Cheng (2006)
96
50.98 U/ml
Laohaprapanon et al.
(2007)
96
129 U/ml
Wu et al. (2006a)
Morimoto et al.
(2004)
38
4,708 ml H2/(l-medium)
168
Vijayaraghavan
and Ahmad (2006)
At steady state
(during day 2228)
0.42 l biogas/g
CODdestroyed
with 57% hydrogen
content
4.4 l H2/(1-medium)
per day
At steady state
(during day 2228)
6.1 l H2/(1-medium)
per day
48
6.33 H2/(1-medium)
O-Thong et al.
(2008a)
Penicillium (P1-EFB)
Isolate SO1
Lignin
peroxidase
Lignin
peroxidase
Lipase
Phanerochaete chrysosporium
Penicillium (P1-EFB)
Clostridium aurantibutyricum
ATCC 17777
Xylanase
Xylanase
Raw POME
Xylanase
Isolate SO1
Protease
Hydrogen
Hydrogen
Hydrogen
Mixed culture
(isolated from cow dung)
Raw POME
Hydrogen
Thermophilic microora
Raw POME
Hydrogen
Thermophilic microora
Hydrogen
Thermoanaerobacterium-rich
sludge
et al.
et al.
et al.
Chowdhury et al.
(2006)
Somrutai et al.
(1996)
Cellulase
(FPase)
Cellulase
(FPase)
Cellulase
et al.
45
3.1.2. Bioinsecticides
Nor and Mahadi (1986) as well as Suwandi (1991) embarked on a
research topic related to the use of ultraltered POME concentrate or
retentate as a medium for Bacillus thuringiensis to produce bioinsecticide for mosquito control. Suwandi (1991) observed that a medium
containing 1% (w/v) retentate in powder form was as good as the
standard medium of glucose yeast extract salts in terms of spore
production by B. thuringiensis. The ability of the retentate to support
and stimulate the growth of B. thuringiensis could be attributed to the
proper ratio of carbon and nitrogen as well as to sufcient levels of
ions (such as Mg, Ca, Mn, etc.) in the POME.
Chemical analyses of POME with respect to its proximate composition have been carried out (Wood, 1977; Hwang et al., 1978; Ho et al.,
1984; Habib et al.,1997), and these analyses are of vital importance in the
understanding of the properties of POME in relation to formulating
waste-utilization programs and efcient wastewater management
processes. This is particularly true in view of the increasing emphasis
placed on the zero discharge concept and innovative technology for
sustainable development. An important case is the production of biogas
and other metabolites by fermentation processes. Of no less importance
is the possibility of recovering bioresources from POME, or its conversion
into useful substitutes for animal feed and fertilizer.
46
development since the cultures inoculated with C. saccharoperbutylacetonicum N1-4 (ATCC 13564) using the sludge hydrolysate produced the
same concentration of butanol as compared to in a potato glucose
medium, whereas the corresponding ethanol production was increased
by over 100%. The authors concluded that the enzymatic hydrolysates of
separator sludge could serve as growth and ABE fermentation media as
well as a source of nitrogen and trace elements.
Somrutai et al. (1996) investigated the possibility of acetonebutanol
fermentation by C. aurantibutyricum ATCC 17777 in a model medium for
raw POME. They found that by decreasing the pH from 6.2 to 5.5 at 9 h
and starting an hourly glucose feeding (2 g/l) at 10 h, it was possible to
obtain 30% of the oil hydrolysis as well as a production of 5.78 g/l acetone
and 6.78 g/l butanol. Kalil et al. (2003) studied the direct use of raw
POME as a fermentation medium for ABE production by
C. acetobutylicum NCIMB 13357 and immobilized C. saccharoperbutylacetonicum N1-4 in a batch culture system. It was found that
C. acetobutylicum NCIMB 13357 produced the highest total ABE in 90%
(v/v) particulate fraction of raw POME after 48 h of fermentation at an
initial pH of 5.8 while immobilized cells of C. saccharoperbutylacetonicum
N1-4 could be reused for at least 5 times in 100% (v/v) particulate
fraction of raw POME without losing their performance (Kalil et al.,
2003). Similar results were also obtained by Pang et al. (2004) with the
addition of hydrogen production up to 28.5 ml.
An oscillatory ow bioreactor was used to enhance the production
of ABE in the raw POME (Takriff et al., 2005; Masngut et al., 2006,
2007), and initial results showed that by using a particulate fraction of
raw POME as the fermentation medium, C. acetobutylicum NCIMB
13357 could produce 31% higher concentrations of ABE, especially
acetone, in ask as compared to an oscillatory ow bioreactor (Takriff
et al., 2005). On the other hand, Masngut et al. (2006, 2007) found that
C. acetobutylicum NCIMB 13357 could only produce higher amounts of
butanol in shorter periods of time when particulate fractions of raw
POME were used in an oscillatory ow bioreactor as opposed to with a
reinforced clostridial medium in a stirred tank bioreactor. Pang et al.
(2004) also claimed that the concentration of ABE produced by
C. acetobutylicum NCIMB 13357 in a particulate fraction of raw POME
was 20-fold that obtained in the reinforced clostridial medium.
3.1.4. Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA)
Over 40% of the total polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) production
cost is estimated to account for the raw materials of the overall
process and more than 70% of this cost is attributed to the carbon
source (Lee et al., 1999). POME can be considered as an alternative, nocost reusable substrate for PHA production. According to Hassan et al.,
(1997a), with a content of 50% PHA in the dried cells and 2% dissolved
in the chloroform, the calculated minimum cost for obtaining PHA
from POME is below 2 US$/kg. By increasing the PHA content in the
cell from 50% to 80%, the unit cost of PHA could be slightly reduced;
whereas an increase in the amount of PHA dissolved in chloroform
from 2% to 5% would result in a remarkable reduction of the PHA cost
to less than 1 US$/kg (Hassan et al., 1997a).
Nevertheless, POME is usually presented in complicated forms that
cannot be directly reused by PHA-producing species such as Ralstonia
eutropha, a representative bacterium for PHA synthesis (Salim et al.,
2006). It was proposed that an anaerobic treatment of POME could be
coupled with PHA production using photosynthetic bacteria to reduce
PHA production costs (Hassan et al., 1996, 1997b). According to Hassan
et al. (1996), it was critical to maintain the pH at 7 in the anaerobic
treatment of POME by sludge in the rst stage of the process, in order
for only acetic and propionic acid to be produced and not formic acid
and biogas. With increasing concentrations of formic acid (for a pH
maintained below 4), the PHA yield and content in Rhodobacter
sphaeroides IFO 12203 dropped from 0.50 g/g and 67% to 0.21 g/g and
18%, respectively. Hassan et al. (1997b) later found that the presence of
sludge in the anaerobically treated POME inhibited PHA accumulation
by R. sphaeroides IFO 12203. This was attributed to the PHA being
47
48
Table 4
The application of POME (m3/acre/year) as fertilizer for palm oil plantations (Onyia
et al., 2001)
Table 3
Estimated fertilizer values from POME, which is based on 15 million tonnes of POME
Fertilizer
Tonnes
(1000)
Fertilizer value
(RM million)
Ammonium
sulphate
Rock phosphate
Muriate of potash
Kieserite
Total
75.5
580
43.79
19.5
68.6
59.6
545
250
400
10.63
17.15
23.84
95.41
Crops
Mg
Young palms
Adults palms
Old palms
2570
90128
162
27.532
52.5
52
5.110
1018.5
18
1.210
15
20
Humic acid
Claried POME
Decomposed POME
3.47
97.5
1.82
99.5
57.87
8.26
2.91
30.96
3.75
19.89
7.01
48.94
5.76
8.05
37.25
6.47
6.08
8.50
2.52
2.22
3.34
5.56
4.22
2.85
2.08
3.27
5.35
6.09
The slow release of the total N and P after the rst 12 weeks could
also become a limiting factor if these nutrients were to be made
available for plant growth (Palaniappan et al., 1983). Therefore, Azizah
Chulan (1991) suggested that if POME were to be reused as fertilizer,
the soil should be inoculated with vesiculararbuscular mycorrhizal
(VAM) fungus Scutellospora calospora because the combination
between POME and VAM will form mycorrhizae that may enhance
the breakdown of certain soluble phosphates and insoluble organic
phosphate such as phytate by roots (Gianinazzi-Pearson, 1985). Onyia
et al. (2001) stated that the application of organic nitrogen from raw
POME has been associated with lower yields due to ammonia being
liberated during the mineralization of organic matter. Onyia et al.
(2001) therefore suggested that nitrication of POME was necessary
since a nitried POME would be more easily absorbed by most plants
than a raw POME with a high organics content, especially in the
tropics where nitrate leaching does not present a major problem.
Numerous studies have identied ammonia volatilization as the
major cause of low N efciencies in urea (Mikkelsen et al., 1978; Fillery
et al., 1984), in which case up to 80% of the applied urea-N may be lost
within 23 weeks of application (Hargrove and Kissel, 1979; Torello
et al., 1983). Siva et al. (2000) reported that POME is rich in organic
matter and varying amounts of humic substances across their
respective organic matrices (Table 5). Seeing as humic substances
have been reported to interact with ammonia compounds (Banerjee
and Basak, 1978; Thorn and Mikita, 1992) and urea (Patti et al., 1992),
Siva et al. (1999, 2000) investigated the effects of POME-derived
humic substances on ammonia volatilization from urea. Initial studies
by Aminuddin (1994) showed that POME could introduce a preferred
environment within the ureasoil reaction zone (microsite) and
successfully reduce ammonia volatilization to 8% of the applied N. Siva
et al. (1999) displayed that this reduction in ammonia volatilization
was accompanied by a corresponding increase in ammonium recovery
and a decrease in pH, particularly at the microsite. The performance of
humic fractions from POME also indicated an interplay of several
mechanisms that could possibly include urease inhibition, urea
absorption and ammonia xation (Siva et al., 2000). These results
have implications to the reduction of N loss by ammonia volatilization
from urea applied to the soil during crop production.
According to Muhrizal et al (2006), the incorporation of organic
material into iron-poor acid sulfate soil might enhance the benecial
effects of reducible Fe(III) oxides or S in the soil and eventually promote
an increase in pH under ooded conditions. However, not all organic
materials are able to alleviate acid sulfate soil infertility with equal
efcacy (Muhrizal et al., 2003). Although POME contains considerable
amounts of organic materials, Muhrizal et al. (2006) revealed that
49
POME did not signicantly affect the pH and redox potential in the
iron-poor acid sulfate soil during submergence. They also claimed that
POME contains high concentrations of lignin that presumably decomposes slowly under anaerobic condition. Thus, these materials could
not become active electron donors in the reduction process.
3.3. Sustainable reuse of POME as live food for animals and aquacultural
organisms
The reuse of POME as a dietary substitute for pigs, poultry and small
ruminants as well as aquacultural organisms is gaining importance.
Apart from oil palm fronds, palm press ber and palm kernel cake,
Devendra (2004) pointed out that POME was especially important for
feeding ruminants. Using POME as animal feeds, however, could only
be considered as a co-management of the efuent because, according
to Agamuthu (1995), a 40-ton-per-hour mill would require around
44,000 pigs or 43,000 cattle for the entire efuent to be utilized.
Hutagalung et al. (1977) investigated the use of POME as animal
feed for growingnishing pigs, in which case two types of meals
known as censor tk8 (35% palm oil sludge, 32.5% cassava root meal,
32.5% palm kernel cake) and tkg (32% palm oil sludge, 34% cassava root
meal, 17% palm kernel cake, 17% grass meal) were used. They found
that it was economical to replace 50% maize (the regular diet
constituent) with a POME-based animal feed, thus saving up to RM
0.02 per pig per day. In Colombia, POME has been fed with good
results directly to pig (1012 l/head/day) together with palm oil and
other ingredients (Devendra, 2004).
POME could also be used as supplementary food in poultry farming.
According to Ho (1976), animal feed production from palm oil wastes
can replace at least half of the amount of imported maize for poultry
diets and up to 100% for pig diets. Yeong et al. (1980) investigated the
nutritive values of a POME product known as Prolima (Table 6) as the
protein source in broiler chicken diets. It was observed that the amino
acid content of palm kernel cake and palm oil sludge were somewhat
close to cereal by-products and that of Prolima was between soybean
meal and peanut meal, in which case the overall percentage of amino
acid availability for palm kernel cake, palm oil sludge and Prolima
were 74.4%, 24.8% and 71.0%, respectively. Therefore, the concentrations of Prolima up to 30% could be included in broiler diets as a
replacement for soybean meal without causing any adverse effect on
the growth performance of the chickens (Yeong et al., 1980). Later,
Yeong and Azizah (1987) reported the optimum levels of using 1015%
of dried POME in chicken feed for the growth and egg production.
Pasha (2007) also reported that the optimum levels of POME in the diet
for broilers and layers are 15% and 10%, respectively.
The Malaysian Agricultural Research Development (MARDI) proved
that wastes from the palm oil industry (such as oil palm sludge and palm
press ber) alone or in combination, dried to moisture contents of 7%,
Table 6
The chemical composition of Prolima as compared to palm oil sludge (Agamuthu,
1995)
Composition
Prolima
Moisture, %
Crude protein (N 6.25), %
Crude ber, %
Ether extract, %
Ash, %
Nitrogen-free extract, %
Calcium, %
Phosphorus, %
Magnesium, %
Iron, mg/l
Copper, mg/l
Manganese, mg/l
Zinc, mg/l
Gross energy, MJ/kg
5.1
43.3
7.6
12.0
4.1
27.9
0.19
0.52
0.17
365
42
56
145
18.5
6.9
12.4
15.2
24.1
11.2
46.7
0.28
0.18
0.25
1757
36
62
1075
19.6
50
51
Kellaway RC, Leibholz J. Effects of nitrogen supplements on intake and utilization of low
quality roughages. World Anim Rev 1983;48:337.
Khalid AR, Wan Mustafa WA. External benets of environmental regulation: resource
recovery and the utilization of efuents. Environmentalist 1992;12:27785.
Klepper O, Hatta GT, Sunardi M, Rijksen HD. Organic matter input and decomposition
before and after development of acid sulfate soils at Pulau Petak, Kalimantan,
Indonesia. Workshop on Acid Sulfate Soils in the Humid Tropics. International
Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement, Wageningen, Netherlands; 1990.
p. 34773.
Koroneos C, Dompros A, Roumbas G, Moussiopoulos N. Life cycle assessment of
hydrogen fuel production processes. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2004;29:144350.
Kotz JP, Thiel PG, Hattingh WHJ. Anaerobic digestion II. The characterization and
control of anaerobic digestion. Water Res 1969;3:45994.
Laohaprapanon T, Prasertsan P, H-Kittikun A. Screening of thermotolerant microorganisms and application for oil separation from palm oil wastewater. Songklanakarin J
Sci Technol 2007;29:8018.
Lee IY, Nam SW, Choi ES, Chang HN, Park YH. Production of poly--hydroxybutyrate and
measurement of related enzyme activities in Alcaligenes eutrophus. J Ferment
Bioeng 1993;76:4168.
Lee SY, Choi J, Wong H. Recent advances in polyhydroxyalkanoate production by
bacterial fermentation: mini review. Int J Biol Macromol 1999;25:316.
Leow TC, Rahman RNZRA, Basri M, Salleh AB. High level expression of thermostable
lipase from Geobacillus sp strain T1. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 2004;68:96-103.
Lim KH, Quah SK, Gillies D, Wood BJ. Palm oil mill efuent treatment and utilization in
Sime Darby Plantations the current position. Workshop Proceedings of the Palm
Oil Research Institute Malaysia, vol. 9. ; 1984. p. 4252.
Lin YT, Labbe RG, Shetty K. Inhibition of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in seafood systems
using oregano and cranberry phytochemical synergies and lactic acid. Innovative
Food Sci Emerging Technol 2005;6:4538.
Lubzens E, Zmora O, Barr Y. Biotechnology and aquaculture of rotifers. Hydrobiologia
2001;446447:33753.
Ma AN. A novel treatment for palm oil mill efuent. Palm Oil Res Instit Malaysia (PORIM)
1995;29:20112.
Ma AN. Environmental management for the palm oil industry. Palm Oil Dev 2000;30:19.
Ma AN, Ong ASH. Pollution control in palm oil mills in Malaysia. J Am Oil Chem Soc
1985;62:2616.
Mandels M. Production and applications of cellulase. Laboratory procedures handbook.
U.S: Army Materials Laboratories; 1974. December.
Mashitah MD, Masitah H, Kamaruddin MY. Palm oil mill efuent: a potential substrate
for cellulase production. The Proceedings of RSCE and 16th SOMChE. Malaysia;
2002. p. 20916.
Masngut N, Takriff MS, Kalil MS, Kadhum AAH, Mohammad AW. Production of
acetonebutanolethanol in oscillatory ow bioreactor. Proceedings of the 20th
Symposium of Malaysian Chemical Engineers (SOMChE 2006). Shah Alam,
Malaysia; 2006. p. 14550.
Masngut N, Takriff MS, Mohammad AW, Kalil MS, Kadhum AAH. Performance of
oscillatory ow reactor and stirred tank reactor in solvent fermentation from palm
oil mill efuent. J Teknol 2007;47(F):4554.
Matsumoto H. Cell biology of aluminum toxicity and tolerance in higher plants. Int Rev
Cytol 2000;200:1-46.
Md Din MF, Ujang Z, Muhd Yunus S, van Loosdrecht MCM. Storage of polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) in fed-batch mixed culture using palm oil mill efuent (POME). 4th
Seminar on Water Management (JSPS-VCC). Johor; 2006a. p. 11927.
Md Din MF, Ujang Z, van Loosdrecht MCM, Ahmad A, Sairan MF. Optimization of
nitrogen and phosphorus limitation for better biodegradable plastic production and
organic removal using single fed-batch mixed cultures and renewable resources.
Water Sci Technol 2006b;53:1520.
Mikkelsen DS, De Datta SK, Obcemea WN. Ammonia volatilization losses from ooded
rice soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 1978;42:72530.
Morimoto M, Atsuko M, Atif AAY, Ngan MA, Fakhru'l-Razi A, Iyuke SE, et al. Biological
production of hydrogen from glucose by natural anaerobic microora. Int J
Hydrogen Energy 2004;29:70913.
Muhrizal S, Shamshuddin J, Husni MHA, Fauziah I. Alleviation of aluminum toxicity in an
acid sulfate soil using organic materials. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal
2003;34:29933011.
Muhrizal S, Shamshuddin J, Fauziah I, Husni MAH. Changes in iron-poor acid sulfate soil
upon submergence. Geoderma 2006;131:11022.
Mun LT, Ishizaki A, Yoshino S, Furukawa K. Production of acetone, butanol and ethanol
from palm oil waste by Clostridium saccharoperbutylacetonicum N1-4. Biotechnol
Lett 1995;17:64954.
Nor MT, Mahadi NM. Ultraltration makes POME suitable medium for Bacillus
thuringiensis H-14. Proc. of 3rd ASEAN Workshop on Membrane Technology.
Singapore; 1986. p. 11824.
O-Thong S, Prasertsan P, Intrasungkha N, Dhamwichukorn S, Birkeland NK. Improvement of biohydrogen production and treatment efciency on palm oil mill efuent
with nutrient supplementation at thermophilic condition using an anaerobic
sequencing batch reactor. Enzyme Microb Technol 2007;41:58390.
O-Thong S, Prasertsan P, Intrasungkha N, Dhamwichukorn S, Birkeland NK. Optimization of simultaneous thermophilic fermentative hydrogen production and COD
reduction from palm oil mill efuent by Thermoanaerobacterium-rich sludge. Int J
Hydrogen Energy 2008a;33:122131.
O-Thong S, Prasertsan P, Karakashev D, Angelidaki I. Thermophilic fermentative
hydrogen production by the newly isolated Thermoanaerobacterium thermosaccharolyticum PSU-2. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2008b;33:120414.
Oka A, Suzuki N, Watanabe T. Effect of fatty acids in Moina on the fatty acid composition
of larvae Ayu Plecoglossus altivelis. Bull Jpn Sci Soc Fish 1982;48:115962.
52
International Conference on Chemical and Bioprocess Engineering / 19th Symposium of Malaysian Chemical Engineers: ICCBPE/SOMChE 2005. Sabah, Malaysia;
2005. p. 1435.
Tam TK, Yeow KH, Poon YC. Land application of POME, H & C experience. Proceedings of
the Regional Workshop on Palm Oil Mill Technology and Efuent Treatment. Kuala
Lumpur, Malaysia; 1982. p. 21624.
Teoh KC, Chew PS. Use of palm oil sludge cake in oil palm and cocoa polybag nurseries. In:
Lim KH, Bachik AT, Chin PY, editors. Proc seminar on land application of palm oil mill
and rubber factory efuent. Kuala LumpurMalaysian Soil Sci Soc; 1983. p. 14262.
Thorn KA, Mikita MA. Ammonia xation by humic substances: a nitrogen-15 and
carbon-13 NMR study. Sci Total Environ 1992;113:6787.
Tian G, Kang BT, Brussaard L. Biological effects of plant residues with contrasting
chemical compositions under humid tropical conditions decompositions and
nutrient release. Soil Biol Biochem 1992;24:105160.
Torello WA, Wehner DJ, Turgeon AJ. Ammonia volatilization from fertilized turfgrass
stands. Agron J 1983;75:4546.
Uzel A, Sorkun K, na , oulu D, Genay , Salih B. Chemical compositions and
antimicrobial activities of four different Anatolian propolis samples. Microbiol Res
2005;160:18995.
Vadiveloo J. Performance of young indigenous and crossbred goats fed forages
supplemented with palm oil mill efuent. Small Rumin Res 1988;1:36979.
Vadiveloo J. Supplementation of alkali-treated rice straw. Biol Wastes 1989a;27:1537.
Vadiveloo J. The intake and digestibility in goats of Leucaena leucocephala supplemented
with dehydrated palm oil mill efuent. Anim Feed Sci Technol 1989b;24:4555.
Vairappan CS, Yen AM. Palm oil mill efuent (POME) cultured marine microalgae as
supplementary diet for rotifer culture. J Appl Phycol (in press); doi:10.1007/s10811007-9305-1
Vijayaraghavan K, Ahmad D. Biohydrogen generation from palm oil mill efuent using
anaerobic contact lter. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2006;31:128491.
Wang CW, Chong CN, Rahim Bidin. Growth of SCP on hydrolysate of palm oil sludge.
Proceedings of the First ASEAN Workshop on the Technology of Animal Feed
Production Utilizing Food Waste Materials. Bandung; 1981. p. 1-13.
Wase DAJ, Raymahasay S, Wang WC. Production of -D-glucosidase, endo-1,4--Dglucanase and D-xylanase from straw by Aspergillus fumigatus IMI 255091. Enzyme
Microb Technol 1985;7:2259.
Wattanapenpaiboon N, Wahlqvist ML. Phytonutrient deciency: the place of palm fruit.
Asia Pacic J Clin Nutr 2003;12:3638.
Webb BH, Rajagopalan K, Cheam ST, Dhiaddin MNJ. Palm oil mill waste recovery as a byproduct industry, Part I mechanical aspects. Planter 1975;51:85-101.
Wood BJ. A review of current methods for dealing with palm oil mill efuent. Planter
1977;53:47795.
Wood BJ, Pillai KR, Rajaratnam JA. Palm oil mill efuent disposal on land. Agric Wastes
1979;1:10327.
Wu TY, Mohammad AW, Md Jahim J, Anuar N. Penghasilan asid itakonik oleh Aspergillus
terreus IMI 282743 dalam pelbagai jenis medium penghasilan. Pascasidang
Kolokium Jabatan Kejuruteraan Kimia dan Proses. Malaysia; 2005. p. 14751.
Wu TY, Mohammad AW, Md Jahim J, Anuar N. Investigations on protease production by
a wild-type Aspergillus terreus strain using diluted retentate of pre-ltered palm oil
mill efuent (POME) as substrate. Enzyme Microb Technol 2006a;39:12239.
Wu TY, Mohammad AW, Md Jahim J, Anuar N. Treatment of palm oil mill efuent
(POME) using ultraltration membrane and sustainable reuse of recovered
products as fermentation substrate. 4th Seminar on Water Management (JSPSVCC). Johor, Malaysia; 2006b. p. 12835.
Wu TY, Mohammad AW, Md Jahim J, Anuar N. Palm oil mill efuent (POME) treatment
and bioresources recovery using ultraltration membrane: effect of pressure on
membrane fouling. Biochem Eng J 2007;35:30917.
Yamane T, Fukunaga M, Lee YW. Increased PHB productivity by high-cell-density fedbatch culture of Alcaligenes latus, a growth-associated PHB producer. Biotechnol
Bioeng 1996;50:197202.
Yee PL, Hassan MA, Shirai Y, Wakisaka M, Karim MIA. Continuous production of organic
acids from palm oil mill efuent with sludge recycle by the freezingthawing
method. J Chem Eng Jpn 2003;36:70710.
Yeong SW, Azizah A. Effect of processing on feeding values of palm oil mill efuent
(POME) in non-ruminants. Proceedings of 10th Annual Conference, Malaysian
Society of Animal Production. Genting Highlands, Malaysia; 1987. p. 3026.
Yeong SW, Syed Ali AB, Faizah M. The nutritive value of a palm oil mill efuent product
(PROLIMA) as a protein source in broiler diets. MARDI Res Bull 1980;8:24759.
Yusoff S, Hansen SB. Feasibility study of performing an life cycle assessment on crude
palm oil production in Malaysia. Int J Life Cycle Assess 2007;12:508.
Yusoff MF, Om AD, Cheah SH. Use of agro-industrial efuent in augmenting microalgae
production and sh fry growth in hatchery tanks. J Aqua Trop 1996;11:11926.
Zeikus JG. Chemical and fuel production by anaerobic bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol
1980;34:42364.