Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Name
Group
: L02
Lecturer
Table of Contents
1.0 Objective
2.0 Introduction
5.0 Result
6.0 Discussion
16
7.0 Conclusion
18
8.0 Recommendation
18
9.0 References
19
1.0 OBJECTIVES
The objectives that supposed to be achieved:
1) Widens the knowledge and understands more on using Bentley Maxsurf and NavCad
software.
2) Runs analysis and predict the vessel speed and power performance by using the
software related.
3) Obtain the total resistance and the effective power of the vessel.
2.0
INTRODUCTION
Nowadays, the wide-spread use of computers in combination with the increase of
computer power, made simulation a very useful tool in every field of science. The benefits
are simple and can be summarized in the fact that experiments can be done without wasting
great amounts of resources, human labor and time.
To calculate the propulsion power for a ship, the resistance and the total propulsive
efficiency have to be determined with the highest possible accuracy. As empirical methods
are normally used for these calculations, it is worthwhile at least to know the accuracy of the
different elements in the calculation procedures such that the propulsive power can be
predicted in combination with an estimate of the uncertainty of the result.
In the extrapolation of the resistance test result Froudes hypothesis and similarity law
is followed. According to Froudes hypothesis the resistance of a ship (or of its model) can be
split up into two independent components, one (the viscous component) being proportional to
the (friction) resistance of a flat plate of the same length and wetted surface area when towed
at the same speed and another component RW which follows Froudes similarity law. The
proportionality factor between the viscous component and the flat plate resistance is called
the form factor (1+k) because it corrects for the effect of the three dimensional hull form.
3.0
SOFTWARE EQUIPMENTS
i.
ii.
NavCad Software
iii.
4.0
VESSEL PARTICULARS
4.1
A transonic hull having a bow, a stern, a longitudinal length there between, side
surfaces extending from the bow to outboard portions of the stern, a lower surface extending
between the side surfaces, the transonic hull having a submerged volume with an
approximately triangular shape in plan view with apex adjacent the bow and a base adjacent
the stern, and an approximately triangular shape in side view when in motion with a base
adjacent the bow and an apex adjacent the stern.
Hydrodynamics theory establishes that wave making resistance of displacement hulls
originate from their body shape, especially from shoulders, midbody, and rear quarter
curvatures of their waterplane at the water-air interface. These curvatures create bow waves,
midbody troughs, and stern waves, which set the hull speed limit when the distance
between bow and stern wave equal the boats length. Above hull speed, resistance grows at a
high exponential rate. Transonic Hull technology eliminates this problem by using a slender
triangular waterplane with apex at the bow, and rectilinear sides, free of curvatures, extending
from bow to a maximum beam at the stern. This shape also generates the sharpest possible
entry angle at the bow.
4.2
Vessel Data
5.0
RESULT
The prediction of resistance of a vessel in calm water can be obtained through the
5.1
The hull form in the Maxsurf is exported to the Autocad 2013 that are consists of
profile, body plan and plan of the hull. All of them are combined to form a lines plan.
5.2
When the designs have been modeled using Maxsurf Modeler, their stability and the
strength characteristics can be assessed using the Maxsurf Stability analysis module. Mazsurf
Stability provides with a range of powerful analysis capabilities to handle all types of stability
and strength calculations. Precise calculations are performed directly from the trimmed
Maxsurf NURB surface model without the offsets or batch file preparation.
1.700
295.4
0.0
1.700
1.700
1.700
0.000
49.415
9.915
343.325
288.662
0.572
0.355
0.636
0.589
17.827
18.614
1.087
1.700
4.535
142.711
3.922
142.097
5.622
143.797
2.887
8.394
20.216
0.0000
0.0000
10
11
12
13
Page 1
20 Mar 2014 11:27 PM
Project: FSV Transonic Hull AFS.nc5
Analysis parameters
[Calc] NTUA
Bare-hull
ITTC
Friction line
Prediction
Technique
[Off]
Align to
[Off]
Align by
0.00045
Correlation allowance
[Off] 0.0
Roughness (mm)
[On] 1.1835
3D form factor
Speed dependent correction [Off]
Appendage
Wind
Seas
Channel
Misc: Margin
Water type
Mass density
Kinematic viscosity
Prediction results
Vel [kts]
16.00
18.00
20.00
22.00
24.00
26.00
28.00
30.00
32.00
34.00
Fn
0.374
0.421
0.467
0.514
0.561
0.608
0.654
0.701
0.748
0.795
Rn
3.42e+8
3.85e+8
4.28e+8
4.71e+8
5.13e+8
5.56e+8
5.99e+8
6.42e+8
6.85e+8
7.27e+8
Cf
0.001757
0.001729
0.001706
0.001684
0.001666
0.001648
0.001633
0.001618
0.001605
0.001593
[Cform]
0.000322
0.000317
0.000313
0.000309
0.000306
0.000302
0.000300
0.000297
0.000295
0.000292
[Cw]
0.005187
0.005026
0.004663
0.004167
0.003610
0.003062
0.002578
0.002198
0.001939
0.001795
Vel [kts]
16.00
18.00
20.00
22.00
24.00
26.00
28.00
30.00
32.00
34.00
Rw/W
0.02139
0.02623
0.03004
0.03248
0.03349
0.03334
0.03256
0.03187
0.03199
0.03343
Rr/W
0.02272
0.02789
0.03206
0.03489
0.03633
0.03663
0.03634
0.03617
0.03684
0.03887
Rbare/W
0.03181
0.03926
0.04595
0.05153
0.05596
0.05948
0.06264
0.06616
0.07074
0.07691
Rw [N]
63505
77889
89211
96455
99458
98995
96677
94628
94983
99264
Rr [N]
67452
82806
95198
103610
107877
108775
107912
107412
109409
115425
Vel [kts]
16.00
18.00
20.00
22.00
24.00
26.00
28.00
30.00
32.00
34.00
Rapp [N]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Rwind [N]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Rmisc [N]
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Report ID20140320-2327
Cr
0.005509
0.005343
0.004976
0.004476
0.003916
0.003364
0.002878
0.002495
0.002234
0.002088
Ct
0.007715
0.007523
0.007132
0.006610
0.006031
0.005463
0.004961
0.004564
0.004289
0.004131
Page 2
20 Mar 2014 11:27 PM
Project: FSV Transonic Hull AFS.nc5
LNB 30203 SHIP RESISTANCE AND PROPULSION |
14
Ct-based:
49.000 [m] Max section area
0.000 [m] Waterplane area
49.415 [m] Trim by stern
9.923 [m] LCB aft of FP
1.699 [m] Bulb ext fwd FP
302.80 [t] Bulb area at FP
352.336 [m2] Bulb ctr above BL
Round bilge
Transom area
Transom beam
Transom draft
4.9798
Half ent angle
5.8405
Bow shape
0.3543
Stern shape
2.9174
Cx
Cw
LCB/Lpp
At/Ax
Bt/Bx
Tt/T
10.465 [m2]
0.000 [m2]
0.000 [m]
17.826 [m]
0.000 [m]
0.000 [m2]
0.000 [m]
0.004 [m2]
9.922 [m]
0.000 [m]
36.880 [deg]
Average flow [Normal]
Buttock flow [V-shape]
0.6207
0.5887
0.3638
0.0004
0.9999
0.0000
Parameters:NTUA
Fn(Lwl)
0.2...1.1 0.37
Fn-high
0.2...1.1 0.79
Cvol(Lwl)
6.2...8.5 7.42
Lwl/Bwl
4.3...7.5 4.98
Bwl/T
3.2...6.2 5.84
Cb(Lwl)
0.34...0.54 0.35
Appendages
Wetted areas (ex. thruster):
Rudders
Shaft brackets
Skeg
Strut bossing
Hull bossing
Exposed shafts
Stablizer fins
Dome
Bilge keel
Bow thruster diam
0.000 [m2]
0.000 [m2]
0.000 [m2]
0.000 [m2]
0.000 [m2]
0.000 [m2]
0.000 [m2]
0.000 [m2]
0.000 [m2]
0.000 [m]
[Drag coefficient]
[0.000]
[0.000]
[0.000]
[0.000]
[0.000]
[0.000]
[0.000]
[0.000]
[0.000]
[0.000]
Parameters:Holtrop 1988
None given
Report ID20140320-2327
Page 3
20 Mar 2014 11:27 PM
Project: FSV Transonic Hull AFS.nc5
15
Environment data
Wind:
Wind speed
Angle off bow
Tran hull area
VCE above WL
Tran superst area
VCE above WL
Total Longl area
VCE above WL
Wind speed
Arrangement
0.00 [kts]
0.000 [deg]
0.000 [m2]
0.000 [m2]
0.000 [m2]
0.000 [m]
0.000 [m2]
0.000 [m]
Free stream
Cargo ship
Seas:
Sig. wave height
Modal wave period
0.000 [m]
0 [sec]
Channel:
Channel width
Channel depth
Side slope
Wetted hull girth
0.000 [m]
0.000 [m]
0.000 [deg]
0.000 [m]
16
6.0 DISCUSSION
From the analysis using NavCAD, the method that suitable for FSV Transonic Hull
AFS is NTUA (National Technical University of Athens).
The resistance of the ship is defined as the force, which opposes the movement of the
ship. Thus, its direction is always opposite to the ships direction. For ahead movement of the
ship the resistance is negative in vice versa. Usually it is calculated in calm water. In this
model, apart from the resistance in calm water, the effect on resistance of maneuvering
through shallow water is considered.
The calculations were done according to the Holtrop method (Holtrop,
Mennen, 1982) (Holtrop, 1984), which is the most frequently used method for such
applications. This method was developed through a regression analysis of random model
experiments and full-scale data. The total resistance of the ship has been subdivided into:
17
Where is the water density, u the ships speed, S the wetted area of the ship and CF the
frictional resistance factor. The latter is calculated as (ITTC 1957 formula):
18
7.0
CONCLUSION
The model is successfully recreated through Maxsurf Modeler and then Maxsurf
Resistance (Holtrop Method) in order to determine resistance. It is continued in Maxsurf
Stability and the hydrostatic data has been gained to be put into the NavCad. From the
NavCad, the NTUA method is the most suitable for the FSV Transonic Hull AFS. The
resistance and effective power is successfully gained through NavCad. The engine and
propeller chosen accorded with each other and intersected in the graph.
8.0
RECOMMENDATION
From the result data, it shows that the project is successful by using NTUA method.
This type of vessel is suitable for the vehicles and supply vessel. The total resistance at the
speed of 20 knots is 148 kN. Meanwhile, the total effective power for 20 knots of speed is
equal to 1400 kW.
19
9.0
REFERENCE
Book
1)
1)
2)
transonichullcompany.com/
3)
www.marinelink.com/news/article/transonic-hull
20