Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Keywords
Neutrosophic crisp topological spaces, neutrosophic crisp sets, neutrosophic crisp
continuity, neutrosophic crisp compact space.
1. Introduction
Smarandache [26, 27] introduced the notion of neutrosophic sets, which is a generalization
of Zadeh's fuzzy set [28]. In Zadah's sense, there is no precise definition for the set. Later on,
Atanassov presented the idea of the intuitionistic fuzzy set [1], where he goes beyond the
degree of membership introducing the degree of non-membership of some element in the set.
The new presented concepts attracted several authors to develop the classical mathematics.
For instance, Chang [2] and Lowen [6] started the discipline known as "Fuzzy Topology",
where they forwarded the concepts from fuzzy sets to the classical topological spaces.
Furthermore, Salama et al. [14, 17, 20] established several notations for what they called,
"Neutrosophic topological spaces"].
In this paper, we study in more details some weaker and stronger structures constructed
from the neutrosophic crisp topology introduced in [7], as well as the concepts neutrosophic
crisp interior and the neutrosophic closure.
The remaining of this paper is structured as follows: in 2, some basic definitions are
presented, while the new concepts of neutrosophic crisp nearly open sets are introduced in 3,
in addition to providing a study of some of its properties. The neutrosophic crisp continuous
function and neutrosophic crisp compact spaces are presented in 4 and 5, respectively.
315
2. Terminologies
We recollect some relevant basic preliminaries, in particular, the work introduced by We
recollect some relevant basic preliminaries, in particular, the work introduced by
Smarandache and Salama [7], Salama et al. [8] and Smarandache [25,26,27]. The
neutrosophic components T, I, F: X]0, 1+[to represent the membership, indeterminacy,
and non-membership values of some universe X, respectively, where ]0 , 1+ [ is the nonstandard unit Interval.
Definition 2.1 [7]
Let be a non-empty fixed sample space. A neutrosophic crisp set ( for short) is an
object having the form = (1, 2, 3) where 1, 2 and 3 are subsets of . Where 1 contains
all those members of the space X that accept the event A and 3 contains all those members
of the space X that rejected the event A, while 2 contains those who stand in a distance from
accepting or rejecting A.
Definition 2.2
Salama [7] defined the object having the form = (1, 2, 3) to be
1) (Neutrosophic Crisp Set with Type 1),if satisfying 12= , 13 = and 23 = .
( -Type 1 ).
2) (Neutrosophic Crisp Set with Type 2), if satisfying 12= , 13 = and 23 =
and 123 = ( -Type 2 ).
3) (Neutrosophic Crisp Set with Type 3) if satisfying 123 = and 123 = .
( -Type3 for short) .
Every neutrosophic crisp set of a non-empty set is obviously a having the form
= (1, 2, 3).
Definition 2.3 [7]
Let = (1, 2, 3) a on , then the complement of the set , (c for short ) was
presented in [7], to have one of the following forms:
(C1) c = (1 , 2 , 3 ) or
(C2) c = (3, 2, 1) or
(C3) c= (3, 2 , 1).
Several relations and operations between were defined in [7], which we are introducing
in the following:
Definition 2.4 [7]
Let be a non-empty set, and and in the form = (1, 2, 3), = (1, 2, 3),
then we may consider two possible definitions for subsets ().
The concept of () may be defined as two types:
Type 1. 11, 22 and 33 or
Type 2. 11, 22 and 33
Proposition 2.5[7]
For any neutrosophic crisp set the following are hold
N, NN
N, NN
316
Definition 2.6[7]
Let be a non-empty set, and the two and given in the form = (1, 2, 3) , =
(1, 2, 3), then :
1) may be defined as two types:
i)Type 1. = 11, 22, 33
ii) Type 2. = 11, 22, 33
2) may be defined as two types:
i) Type 1. = 11, 22, 33
ii) Type 2. = 11, 22, 33
Definition 2.7[7]
A neutrosophic crisp topology ( ) on a non-empty set is a family of neutrosophic
crisp subsets of satisfying the following axioms:
i) , .
ii) 12 , 1, 2 .
iii) j, { j : jJ} .
In this case, the pair (, ) is called a neutrosophic crisp topological space () in . The
elements of are called neutrosophic crisp open sets () in . A neutrosophic crisp set
F is closed if and only if its complement Fc is an open neutrosophic crisp set.
Definition 2.8[7]
Let (, ) be and = 1, 2, 3 be a in . Then the neutrosophic crisp closure
of (()) and neutrosophic interior crisp (() ) of are defined by
()={: is an in and }
() = {G:G is an in and G ) ,
Where is a neutrosophic crisp set and is a neutrosophic crisp open set. It can be
also shown that () is a (neutrosophic crisp closed set) and () is a
(neutrosophic crisp open set) in .
Definition 3.1
Let (, ) be a and =1, 2, 3 be a in , then is called:
Neutrosophic crisp -open set iff ((()). [24]
i)
Neutrosophic crisp pre-open set iff (()) .
ii) Neutrosophic crisp semi-open set iff ( ()) .
iii) Neutrosophic crisp - open set iff ( (( ()).
We shall denote the class of all neutrosophic crisp - open sets as, and the class of
all neutrosophic crisp pre-open sets as p, and the class of all neutrosophic crisp semiopen sets as , and the class of all neutrosophic crisp - open sets as .
Definition 3.2
Let (, ) be a and = 1, 2, 3 be a in , then is called:
i)
Neutrosophic crisp -closed set iff ( (( ()) .
ii) Neutrosophic crisp pre- closed set iff ( ()) .
iii) Neutrosophic crisp semi- closed set iff (()) .
iv) Neutrosophic crisp - closed set iff ((()) .
One can easily show that, the complement of a neutrosophic crisp (, pre, semi, )- open set
is a neutrosophic crisp (, pre, semi, )- closed set,respectively.
317
Remark 3.3
For the class consisting of exactly all a - structure and - structure, evidently,
.
We notice that every non-empty - open has -open non-empty interior.
If all neutrosophic crisp sets the family {i}iI, are - open sets, then
Proposition 3.4
Consider, {i}iI, is a family of - open sets, then
{i}iI((i))((i)) , that is A - structure is a neutrosophic
closed with respect to arbitrary neutrosophic crisp unions .
We shall now characterize in terms of .
Definition 3.5
Let (, ) be a and = 1, 2, 3 be a in , then:
() = { G:G and G is -closed}
() = {G:G and G is - open}
pre () = { G:G and G is pre-closed}
pre () = {G:G and G is pre- open}
Definition 3.6
semi () = { G:G and G is semi-closed}
semi () = {G:G and G is semi- open}
() = { G:G and G is -closed}
() = {G:G and G is - open}
Theorem 3.7
Let (, ) be a . Consists of exactly those for which for
.
Proof
Let , , and be a neutrosophic crisp neighborhood (for short
) of p.
Clearly ((()), too is a neutrosophic crisp open neighborhood of ,
so =( ((()))) () is non-empty . Since (())
this implies
(() () =() = .
It follows that
Conversely, (() ())= (()) i.e. .
Let for all . then in particular . Assume that
((()(()))c. Then (), where ((()))c
Clearly {} and consequently {{}}. But {{}}={}. Hence
{} is a neutrosophic crisp open. ((())) implies )((()()),
contrary to assumption. Thus implies ((()) and . Thus we have
found that is complete determined by i.e. all neutrosophic crisp topologies with
the same - structure also determined the same -structure, explicitly given Theorem
3.1.
We shall prove that conversely all neutrosophic crisp topologies with the same structure, so that , is completely determined by
Theorem 3.8
Every -structure is a .
318
Proof
Contains the neutrosophic crisp empty set and is closed with respect to arbitrary
unions. A standard result gives the class of those neutrosophic crisp sets for which
for all constitutes a neutrosophic crisp topology, hence the theorem.
We may now characterize , in terms of in the following way.
Proposition 3.9
Let (, ) be a . Then = and hence -equivalent topologies determine
the same -structure.
Proof
Let andt denote neutrosophic closure and Neutrosophic crisp interior with
respect to . If and , then
(((()))()).
Since (((())) is a crisp neutrosophic neighbor-hood of point p, so
certainly () meets (()) and therefore (big neutrosophic open) meets
() , proving () . This means (()) .i.e. on
the other hand let , . and . As , and (()),
we have ()N and there exist a neutrosophic trip set such that
().
In other words (()) and (()). Thus we have verified
, and the proof is complete combining Theorem 3.1 and Proposition 3.1. and we get
= .
Corollary 3.10
A neutrosophic crisp topology is a - topology iff = . Evidently
is a neutrosophic crisp topology iff = . In this case = = .
Corollary 3.11
-Structure is a neutrosophic crisp topology, then = = .
We proceed to give some results on the neutrosophic structure of neutrosophic crisp
topology
Proposition 3.12
The -open with respect to a given neutrosophic crisp topology are exactly those sets
which may be written as a difference between a neutrosophic crisp open set and a neutrosophic
crisp nowhere dense set. If we have = ((()))
(((())c)c, where (((())c) clearly is neutrosophic
crisp nowhere dense set, we easily see that
(()) and consequently
((()) so the proof is complete.
Corollary 3.13
A neutrosophic crisp topology is a - topology iff all neutrosophic crisp nowhere dense
sets are neutrosophic crisp closed. For a neutrosophic crisp -topology may be
characterized as neutrosophic crisp topology where the difference between neutrosophic crisp
open and neutrosophic crisp nowhere dense set is again a neutrosophic crisp open, and this
evidently is equivalent to the condition stated.
Proposition 3.14
Neutrosophic crisp topologies which are - equivalent, determine the same class of
neutrosophic crisp nowhere dense sets.
319
Proposition 3.16
If a -Structure , is a neutrosophic crisp topology, then all neutrosophic crisp
topologies for which = are neutrosophic crisp extremely disconnected.
In particular: Either all or none of the neutrosophic crisp topologies of a class are
extremely disconnected.
Proof
Let = , and suppose there is such that (). Let
()(())c with = {} (()), = (())c
We have {} = (((A))c= (()),
{} () = ((()) (()). Hence both and are in .
The intersection = {} is not neutrosophic crisp open, since ()c hence not
- open. So, = is not a neutrosophic crisp topology. Now suppose is not a topology,
and = There is a such that . Assume that (()) . Then
(())=((()) i.e. , contrary to assumption. Thus we
have produced an open set whose closure is not open, which completes the proof.
Corollary 3.17
A neutrosophic crisp topology is a neutrosophic crisp extremally disconnected if and
only if is a neutrosophic crisp topology.
Remark 3.18
The following diagram represents the relation between neutrosophic crisp nearly open sets:
preopen set
open set
open set
open set
semiopen set
320
f ( A) f ( A1 ), f ( A2 ), f ( A3 ) .
-1
H ,, H c f
( H ), f
( ), f
(H c )
H ,, ( f
( H ))c 1
(b)
i1
, Gi2 , Gi3
: i J X N , then
i1 , Gi2 , Gi3
:i J
on X, which is also a
321
compact iff every neutrosophic crisp open cover of A has a finite neutrosophic crisp open
subcover.
Definition5.3
A family Ki1 , Ki2 , Ki3
i1
i1
i2
i3
i2
i3
Definition5.4
A NCTS X , is called neutrosophic crisp compact iff each neutrosophic crisp open cover
of X has a finite open subcover.
Corollary5.5
A NCTS X , is a neutrosophic crisp compact iff every family Gi , Gi , Gi : i J of
1
neutrosophic crisp compact sets in X having the finite intersection properties has nonempty
intersection.
Corollary5.6
Let X , 1 , Y , 2 be NCTSs and f : X Y be a continuous surjection. If X , 1 is a
neutrosophic crisp compact, then so is Y , 2 .
Definition5.7
If a family Gi1 , Gi2 , Gi3 : i J of neutrosophic crisp compact sets in X satisfies the
condition A Gi1 , Gi2 , Gi3
:iJ
6. Conclusion
References
1.
2.
3.
4.
322
K. Atanassov, intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 20, 87-96,(1986).
C.L.Chang, Fuzzy Topological Spaces, 1. Math. Anal-Appl. 245,182-190(1968).
I.M. Hanafy, A.A. Salama and K.M. Mahfouz, Neutrosophic Crisp Events and Its Probability,
International Journal of Mathematics and Computer Applications Research(IJMCAR) Vol.(3), Issue
1, pp.171-178,Mar (2013).
I. M. Hanafy, A.A. Salama and K. Mahfouz, Correlation of Neutrosophic Data, International
Refereed Journal of Engineering and Science (IRJES), Vol.(1), Issue 2 . PP.39-33. (2012).
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
323