(2010 1 ) 1-31

1926

1926

1911

(NKZ 1:39)NKZ2003
NKZ :
2

2008 9

2007
54

4
5

(Was)

(NKZ 1:52)

2003 258
5
403-430
6

2001 37

(NKZ 2: 13)

Tathandlung 7

(NKZ 2:3)

[...] Tathandlung
[...](NKZ 2: 83)
8
[...]
(NKZ 2:223)

(NKZ 2:220)

(J.Bhme)
(Ungrund)

2000 43-57

10
11

(NKZ 3:255)

12

10

2008 9
11

2007 488
12

2000 43-57

13

(1926)

14

(NKZ 3:426)

13

1995
14

(NKZ 3:415)

10

(NKZ 3:415)

Timaios
(NKZ 3:415)

(NKZ 3:424)

11

1924

12

15

(entelecheia)

15

(NKZ 3:397)

13

(NKZ 3:428)

(Bewutsein berhaupt)

14

(NKZ 3:419)

(NKZ 3:432f.)

[...]
16

(NKZ 3:446)

17
(NKZ
3:447)(NKZ 3:446)

16

[...]
(NKZ 3:438)
17

(NKZ 3:437)

15

18

(NKZ 3:451)

19

[...]

18

1995 80
19
(NKZ
3:424)

16

(NKZ
3:445)
(NKZ 3:445)

20

21

(NKZ 3:430)

20

(NKZ 3: 429)
21

(NKZ 3:429)

17

(NKZ 3:436)

22

22

(NKZ 3: 477)

18

(1926)

23

(1927)

23

(NKZ 7:222)

19

(NKZ 3:482)
(NKZ 3:420)

(NKZ 3:502)

20

24

25 (NKZ
3:469)
26
(Ereignis)

(1929)
(1932)

24

(NKZ 3:427)
25

[...](NKZ
3:471)
26
2007
100

21

....
27

(1933) (1934)

28

27

2005

3 2 6 2006 12 61-90
28
(1928)

2004
23-43

22

(NKZ 2:228)(1937)

(NKZ 8:9)

(NKZ 6:159)

23

29

30

29

2000 43-57
30

(NKZ 3:443)

24

31

1927

32

33

31

2003 258
32

(NKZ 3:535)
33

2000 53-54

25

[...] 34
35

34

[...]
NKZ
10:168)
35

1987 162

26

36

36

(NKZ 3:477)

27

2005
2006
3 , 2 6
61-90
2007
403-430
2003

258

1997

1995

2007
488

28

2001

1987

2000

2003
NKZ
NKZ 1
NKZ 2
NKZ 3
NKZ 4
NKZ 5
NKZ 6
NKZ 7
NKZ 8
NKZ 10
2004

2004

23-43

29

2008

1998

53-79
2003 6
239-261
2000
43-57
2007

30

The Internal Turn in Nishida

Kitar's Logic of Place
Wen-Hong Huang
National Tsing Hua University

Abstract
With regard to Nishida there is a change of viewpoint inherent in his
philosophy of place. His main line of thinking has turned from a position
which sees the world from the self to the position to see the world from
the world itself. My primary concern in this paper is to clarify this
internal turn according to his view of reality.
I will put the focal point on the discussion of his article "Place" in
1926, and try to clarify some basic ideas of his logic. First (section two) I
will explicate the general movement of Nishida's philosophizing to the
stage of place. And then (section three) I attempt to clarify some basic
conceptions of Nishida's logic of place, especially the way to the place of
absolute nothingness. Some of the key aspects of his philosophizing will
be laid out. We know that the logic of place is a logic of reality. In
constructing his logic the concrete universal play an important role, we
will then (section four) clarify the necessity of Nishida's turn from the
predicative logic to the logic of medium. The emphasis on the medial
perspective of place is a key to his later stage of philosophy. It is my view

31

that the necessity of such a turn lies in the identity of self-contradiction,

which is inherent in the concrete universal. Through this turn Nishida
totally breaks away from subjectivism, and begins his philosophy from
the perspective of world, which includes both self and environment.

Keywords: Kyoto School, Nishida Kitaro, Logic of Place,

Concrete Universal, World

32