Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Overview
Motivation
Turbine that can cope with flow rate variation
from design flow rate to zero flow rate
Needs movable rotor that allows complete sealing
Like variable opening valve with extraction of power
Complete flexibility in flow rate
6 locations on river Sambre in Belgium
Flow rate: 5.5 m3/s to 20 m3/s
Head: 4.40 m to 1.70 m
Initial design
Head (m)
3.60
16.0
2.00
0.80
130
Number of blades
12
4.00
2.75
395
0.70
Initial design
Multiple stream tube analysis
Simple radial equilibrium inlet and outlet
No work exchange between streamtubes
Expressed for nine blade sections
Resulting design:
Overview
Initial design
Sealing rotor
Rotor flow analysis
Diffuser flow analysis
Off-design performance
Closed:
Blade form
Final design
Overview
Initial design
Obtaining rotor sealingness
Rotor flow analysis
Diffuser flow analysis
Off-design performance
Inlet Plane
Interior Plane (InletBlade)
Periodic Plane
Interior Plane (BladeOutlet)
Inlet
600mm
Outlet Plane
Blade
Outlet1
300mm
300mm
600mm
Outlet2
550mm
287mm
1050mm
1050mm
400mm
Radius 475mm
Big incidence,
but lower than expected
No separation
Relative Velocity Magnitude Vector (m/s)
Static Pressure Contour (Pa)
Radius 700mm
Stream tube
hub
Radius ( m)
0.4
0.475
0.55
0.625
0.7
0.775
0.85
0.925
u ( m/s)
5.445
6.466
7.487
8.508
9.529
10.551
11.572
12.593
13.614
c1a ( m/s)
6.813
6.583
6.394
6.233
6.094
5.971
5.862
5.764
5.675
w1u ( m/s)
2.046
3.182
4.297
5.399
6.489
7.571
8.647
9.717
10.782
c2a ( m/s)
6.021
6.074
6.094
6.095
6.087
6.072
6.054
6.033
6.011
w2u ( m/s)
6.619
7.15
7.80
8,.514
9.282
10.094
10.938
11.801
12.676
tip
CFD
hub
tip
Radius ( m)
0.4
0.475
0.55
0.625
0.7
0.775
0.85
0.925
c1a ( m/s)
4.981
6.011
5.944
5.961
6.022
6.098
6.165
6.200
5.106
w1u ( m/s)
2.305
3.249
4.384
5.472
6.563
7.626
8.692
9.737
10.586
c2a ( m/s)
5.360
6.430
6.238
6.087
5.920
5.880
6.128
5.994
4.930
w2u ( m/s)
7.002
7.645
8.395
9.250
10.104
11.035
11.842
12.697
12.931
CFD
hub
tip
radius ( m)
0.4
0.475
0.55
0.625
0.7
0.775
0.85
0.925
W ( m/s)
25.577
28.423
30.028
32.144
33.743
35.966
36.456
37.267
31.924
Performance
Diffuser recovery factor 0.70
Stream tube analysis: Q= 16 m3/s, H= 3.60 m
Pshaft= 387 kW, glob = 0.69
CFD-analysis
Pshaft= 540 kW, Q= 16 m3/s, H= 4.40 m ,glob = 0.74
(with mechanical losses: glob = 0.72)
rematching necessary
Rematching
Overview
Initial design
Obtaining rotor sealingness
Rotor flow analysis
Diffuser flow analysis
Off-design performance
Diffuser design
Geometry
Velocity Inlet
Mixing Plane
Inlet
Blade
Cone
Pressure Outlet
Diffuser
370mm
600mm
4000mm
400mm
Diffuser analysis
CFD Analysis (Mixing plane, k- SST)
Static Pressure Contour(Pa)
Diffuser design
CFD Analysis (Mixing plane, k- SST)
Radial Velocity Magnitude Contour (m/s)
Diffuser design
CFD Analysis (Mixing plane, k- SST)
Axial Velocity Magnitude Contour (m/s)
Outlet diffuser
Diffuser maps:
LR
L
R2
AR
A4
A2
1
1 2
2
2
Dtip
Dhub
2 0.82
2
2
2
2
R4
1.37
2.235
2
R2 0.91652
Cp
0,700
4.364
Cp 0.700
CFD analysis:
Cp
p4 p2
1 2
v
2 2
p2
11468.77Pa
p4 1608.21Pa
v2 6.112 m s
Cp 0.700
Inlet diffuser
Outlet diffuser
Inlet diffuser
Outlet diffuser
Inlet diffuser
= mixing plane
Outlet diffuser
Overview
Initial design
Obtaining rotor sealingness
Rotor flow analysis
Diffuser flow analysis
Off-design performance
Off-design performance:
= 26.5 20 ; = 63.5 78; Q=8 m3/s (H=3.20 m)
Rotor
Velocity Vector Fields:
No separated flow!
Conclusion
Design of an axial hydro turbine with a movable rotor and
blade shape such that the rotor can be completely closed
was successful
Rated conditions: Q= 16 m3/s, H= 3.60 m
Pshaft= 390 kW, glob = 0.70
Half flow rate: glob = 0.60