You are on page 1of 109

ACCCNS CRITICA

L
CARE NURSING

This page intentionally left blank

(021) 66485438 66485457

www.ketabpezeshki.com

ACCCNS CRITICA
L
CARE NURSIN
G
SECOND EDITION

Doug Elliott

Leanne Aitken

Wendy Chaboyer

RN, PhD BAppSc(Nurs),


MAppSc(Nurs), ICCert
Professor of Nursing
Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery
and Health
University of Technology
Sydney, New South Wales

RN, PhD, BHSc(Nurs)Hons,


GradCertMgt,
GradDipScMed(ClinEpi), ICCert,
FRCNA
Professor of Critical Care Nursing
Griffith University & Princess
Alexandra Hospital
Brisbane, Queensland

RN, PhD, MN, BSc(Nurs)Hons,


CritCareCert
Professor & Director, NHMRC Centre
of Research Excellence in Nursing
Interventions for Hospitalised Patients
Griffith Health Institute
Griffith University
Gold Coast, Queensland

Sydney Edinburgh London NewYork Philadelphia StLouis Toronto

(021) 66485438 66485457

www.ketabpezeshki.com

Mosby
is an imprint of Elsevier
Elsevier Australia. ACN 001 002 357
(a division of Reed International Books Australia Pty Ltd)
Tower 1, 475 Victoria Avenue, Chatswood, NSW 2067

2012 Elsevier Australia


This publication is copyright. Except as expressly provided in the Copyright Act 1968 and
the Copyright Amendment (Digital Agenda) Act 2000, no part of this publication may be
reproduced, stored in any retrieval system or transmitted by any means (including
electronic, mechanical, microcopying, photocopying, recording or otherwise) without prior
written permission from the publisher.
Every attempt has been made to trace and acknowledge copyright, but in some cases this
may not have been possible. The publisher apologises for any accidental infringement and
would welcome any information to redress the situation.
This publication has been carefully reviewed and checked to ensure that the content is as
accurate and current as possible at time of publication. We would recommend, however,
that the reader verify any procedures, treatments, drug dosages or legal content described
in this book. Neither the author, the contributors, nor the publisher assume any liability
for injury and/or damage to persons or property arising from any error in or omission
from this publication.
National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication Data

Title: ACCCNs critical care nursing / [editors] Doug Elliott, Leanne Aitken and Wendy
Chaboyer.
Edition: 2nd ed.
ISBN: 9780729540681 (pbk.)
Notes: Includes index.
Subjects: Intensive care nursingAustralia.
Other Authors/Contributors: Elliott, Doug. Aitken, Leanne. Chaboyer, Wendy.
Australian College of Critical Care Nurses.
Dewey Number: 616.028
Publisher: Libby Houston
Developmental Editor: Elizabeth Coady
Publishing Services Manager: Helena Klijn
Editorial Coordinator: Geraldine Minto
Edited by Melissa Read
Proofread by Tim Learner
Indexed by Cynthia Swanson
Cover design by Lamond Art & Design
Typeset by Toppan Best-set Premedia Limited
Printed by China Translating & Printing Services Ltd.

(021) 66485438 66485457

www.ketabpezeshki.com

Contents
9

Cardiovascular Assessment and Monitoring


180
Thomas Buckley, Frances Lin

10

Cardiovascular Alterations and Management

Foreword

vi

215

Preface

vii

Robyn Gallagher, Andrea Driscoll

About the Australian College of Critical Care Nurses

11

(ACCCN)

ix

About the Editors

Contributors

xi

Reviewers

xiii

Acknowledgements

xiv

Detailed Contents

xv

Abbreviations

xviii

Section 1
Scope of Critical Care
1

Scope of Critical Care Practice

Leanne Aitken, Wendy Chaboyer, Doug Elliott


2

Resourcing Critical Care

17

Denise Harris, Ged Williams


3

Quality and Safety

38

Wendy Chaboyer, Karena Hewson-Conroy


4

Recovery and Rehabilitation

57

Doug Elliott, Janice Rattray


5

Ethical Issues in Critical Care

78

Amanda Rischbieth, Julie Benbenishty

Section 2 Principles and Practice of


Critical Care
6

103

Essential Nursing Care of the Critically


Ill Patient

105

Bernadette Grealy, Wendy Chaboyer


7

Psychological Care

133

Leanne Aitken, Rosalind Elliott


8

Family and Cultural Care of the Critically


Ill Patient

156

Marion Mitchell, Denise Wilson, Vicki Wade

Cardiac Rhythm Assessment and


Management

251
Malcolm Dennis, David Glanville

Margherita Murgo, Gavin Leslie


21

Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome

562

Melanie Greenwood, Alison Juers


12

Cardiac Surgery and Transplantation

Section 3 Specialty Practice in


Critical Care

291

Judy Currey, Michael Graan


13

Respiratory Assessment and Monitoring

325

22

Amanda Corley, Mona Ringdal


14

Respiratory Alterations and Management

352

23

Ventilation and Oxygenation Management

381

24

414

25

Neurological Alterations and Management

445

26

Support of Renal Function

479

27

Gastrointestinal, Liver and Nutritional

Paediatric Considerations in Critical Care


Pregnancy and Postpartum Considerations
Organ Donation and Transplantation

Appendices
506

Andrea Marshall, Teresa Williams,

Glossary
Picture Credits

Christopher Gordon
Management of Shock

654
679
710
746

Debbie Austen, Elizabeth Skewes

Alterations

20

Resuscitation

Wendy Pollock, Clare Fitzpatrick

Ian Baldwin, Gavin Leslie


19

623

Tina Kendrick, Anne-Sylvie Ramelet

Di Chamberlain, Wendy Corkill


18

Trauma Management

Trudy Dwyer, Jennifer Dennett

Neurological Assessment and Monitoring


Di Chamberlain, Leila Kuzmiuk

17

581

Louise Niggemeyer, Paul Thurman

Louise Rose, Gabrielle Hanlon


16

Emergency Presentations
David Johnson, Mark Wilson

Maria Murphy, Sharon Wetzig, Judy Currey


15

579

Index
539

(021) 66485438 66485457

763
783
790
793

www.ketabpezeshki.com

Foreword
practice tips.
ACCCNs Critical Care Nursing is a beneficial resource
for
As a specialty area of nursing practice, critical care n

critical care nurses, regardless of practice set

ursing

ting. In

is focused on the care of patients who are expe

seeking to provide complex high intensity care, thera

riencing

pies

life-threatening illness. Globally, critical care n

and interventions, critical care nurses will find th

urses

at the

provide care to ensure that critically ill patients and t

book reviews essential content related to critical

heir

care

families receive optimal care. This second edition of t


he
Australian College of Critical Care Nurses (ACCCN
s)
Critical Care Nursing is a valuable resource for critical
care
nursing practice. The editors, who are acknow
ledged
expert practitioners, educators, and researchers in cr
itical
care, have organised the book into topics coverin
g the
scope of critical care, principles and practice of
critical
care, and specialty practice in critical care. The
content
covered in this book, written by established experts i
n the
field of critical care, provides a comprehensive o
verview
of critical care nursing concepts and practices
. The
book provides up-to-date information on evidencebased
practices and the chapters incorporate a variety of e
ducational resources including website links, case studies
and

nurses seeking to further develop their knowledge and


enhance their clinical practice expertise.
nursing knowledge and skills to provide care to acutely
ill patients and their families.

Ruth Kleinpell PhD, RN, FAAN, FCCM


Director, Center for Clinical Research and Scholarship

Internationally, there are more than 500,000 critical care


nurses, representing one of the largest specialty areas of
nursing practice. The importance of maintaining knowl-

Rush University Medical Center;


Professor, Rush University College of Nursing;
Nurse Practitioner, Mercy Hospital & Medical Center

edge of best practices, utilising evidence-based approaches,

Chicago, Illinois, USA

and applying research to clinical practice for critical


care patients remain essential components of critical

President of the World Federation of

care nursing. This second edition of ACCCNs Critical Care

Critical Care Nurses

Nursing is a comprehensive resource for critical care

http://www.wfccn.org

vi

(021) 66485438 66485457

www.ketabpezeshki.com

Preface
environment, while still allowing the universal
core elements that represent critical care practice int
ernationally.
This second edition of ACCCNs Critical Care N
ursing has
Critical care as a clinical specialty is over half a

27 chapters that reflect the collective talent a

century

nd expertise

old. With every successive decade, advances in the e

of 50 contributors a strong mix of academic

duca-

s and clini-

tion and practices of critical care nurses have been m

cians with a passion for critical care nursing

ade.

in showcas-

Today, critical care nurses are some of the most

ing the practice of critical care nursing in Aust

knowl-

ralia, New

edgeable and highly skilled nurses in the world,

Zealand, Asia and the Pacific. We also engage

and

d contribu-

ongoing professional development and educatio

tors beyond Australasia to reflect global practi

n are

ces and to

fundamental elements in ensuring we deliver the hig

extend the applicability of our text to a wider

hest

geographic

quality care to our patients and their families.

audience. All contributors were carefully chos

This book is intended to encourage and challenge nur

en for their

ses

current knowledge, clinical expertise and s

to further develop their critical care nursing practice.

trong profes-

Our

sional reputations.

vision for the first edition was for an original tex

The book has been developed primarily for us

t from

e by prac-

Australasian authors, not an adaptation of texts prod

tising critical care clinicians, managers, res

uced

earchers and

in other parts of the world. This writing approach mor

graduate students undertaking a specialty

critical care

accurately captures the uniquely local elements that

qualification. In addition, senior undergraduat

form

e students

contemporary critical care nursing in Australia and N

studying high acuity nursing subjects will find

ew

this book

Zealand and help to answer the myriad of quest

a valuable reference tool, although it goes

ions
posed by critical care nurses as they practise in the l
ocal

beyond the
learning needs of these students. The aim
of the book

is to be a comprehensive resource, as well as a


portal
to an array of other important resources, for
critical
care nurses. The nature and timeline of book publishi
ng
dictates that the information contained in this have been included in each chapter to facilitate t
book

his

reflects a snapshot in time of our knowledge and und process.


er-

This second edition is again organised in three broad

standing of the complex world of critical care nu sections: the scope of critical care nursing, core comrsing.

ponents of critical care nursing, and specialty aspects

We therefore encourage our readers to continue of critical care nursing. Inclusion of new chapters and
to also

significant revisions to existing chapters were based o

search for the most contemporary sources of knowle n


dge

our reflections and suggestions from colleagues and

to guide their clinical practice. A range of websit reviewers as well as on evolving and emerging practic
e links

es
in critical care.
Section 1 introduces a broad range of professional issues
related to practice that are relevant across critical car
e.
Initial chapters provide contemporary information on
the scope of practice, systems and resources, quality and
safety, recovery and rehabilitation, and ethical issues.
Content presented in the second section is relevant to the
majority of critical care nurses, with a focus on concepts
that underpin practice such as essential physical, psychological, social and cultural care. Remaining chapters in
this section present a systems approach in supporting
physiological function for a critically ill individual. This
edition now has multiple linked chapters for some of the
major physiological systems 4 chapters for cardiovas
cular, 3 for respiratory, and 2 for neurological. Chapters
on support of renal function, gastrointestinal, liver and
nutritional alterations, management of shock, and multiorgan dysfunction complete this section.
The third section presents specific clinical condition
s
such as emergency presentations, trauma, resuscitation
,
paediatric considerations, pregnancy and post-partum
considerations, and organ donation, by building on the
principles outlined in Section 2. This section enables
readers to explore some of the more complex or unique
aspects of specialty critical care nursing practice.
Chapters have been organised in a consistent format t
o
ease identification of relevant material. Where appropri-

ate, each chapter commences with an overview of relevant

healthcare team, is then presented. Pedagogical featur

anatomy and physiology, and the epidemiology of the

es

clinical states in the Australian and New Zealand setting.

include a case study that elaborates relevant care issu

Nursing care of the patient, both delivered independently

es,

vii

or provided collaboratively with other members of the

(021) 66485438 66485457

www.ketabpezeshki.com

viii

P R E FA C E

a critique of a research publication that explores a rel The delivery of effective, high-quality critical care nursing
ated

practice is a challenge in contemporary health care.

topic, and learning activities to assist both the reader We trust that this book will be a valuable resource in
and

supporting your care of critically ill patients and their

those in educational roles to assess knowledge a loved ones.


cquisition. Extensive use of tables, figures and practice tips
are
located throughout each chapter to identify areas of
care
that are particularly pertinent for readers. It is n
ot our
intention that readers progress sequentially throu
gh the
book, but rather explore chapters or sections tha
t are
relevant for different episodes of learning or practice.

Doug Elliott
Leanne Aitken
Wendy Chaboyer

(021) 66485438 66485457

www.ketabpezeshki.com

About the Australian College of


Critical Care Nurses (ACCCN)
and provides local and at times nation

al representation.

The ACCCN Editorial Committee and


The Australian College of Critical Care Nurses, with o

Editorial Board,

ver

under the leadership of the editor of th

2400 members, is the peak professional organi

e Australian Critical

sation

Care (ACC) journal, are responsible for

representing critical care nurses in Australia. Me

the College pub-

mber-

lications including the journal Australia

ship types include standard membership, internati

n Critical Care and

onal

newspaper Critical Times.

members, life members, honorary members and

There are a number of national ad

corpo-

visory panels and

rate members. All individual members are eligible

special interest groups dedicated to pr

oviding the organi-

sation with expert opinion on issues

and
are encouraged to participate in the activities
of the
College; to receive the College journal and Critical Ti
mes

relating to critical
care nursing. These include:
Resuscitation

publication, in addition to discounts for ACCCN confer


ence registration and for ACCCN publications. Life
and
honorary memberships are awarded to individuals
in
recognition of their outstanding contribution to ACCC
N
and/or to critical care nursing excellence in Australia.
ACCCN is a company limited by guarantee a
nd has
branches in each state of Australia, with two me
mbers
from each state branch management committee for
ming
the ACCCN National Board of Directors. Each committ
ee
facilitates the activities of the college at a local/state
level

Advisory

Panel:

consists

of

eight

members representing each branch


of ACCCN, plus a
paediatric nurse representative.
It has developed a
complete suite of contemporary ad

vanced life support


and resuscitation educational mat
erial and offers its

ACCCN National ALS Courses throug


hout Australia;

Research Advisory Panel: in ad


dition to providing
expert advice to ACCCN, the panel i
s responsible for
evaluating and making recommend
ations on research
strategy and grant submissions t

matters relating to education specific to critica

In addi

l care

tion to

nursing. This panel has developed a position pape


r on

branc
committees. The panel has also developed p h educ

critical care nursing education and written sub osition


mis-

ational

statements on nurse staffing for intensive carevents

sions on behalf of ACCCN to national reviews e and


of

and sy

high-dependency units in Australia, and an mponursing education;


Workforce Advisory Panel: has represented A

CCCN
on a number of national health workforce and nurs
ing

nually

siums,

reviews the dataset design for national workforc ACCCN


e data

conduc

collection in conjunction with ANZICS;

ts thre

Organ & Tissue Donation & Transplantatio e natio


n Advi-

nal con

sory Panel: advises the board and develope ference


d a posi-

s each

tion statement on organ donation and transplant year:


ation

ACCCN

as it relates to intensive care. It disseminate Institu


s related

te of

information to critical care nurses regarding the Contin


pro-

uing E

motion and national reform objectives of org ducatio


an and

n (ICE)

tissue donation in Australia;

Quality Advisory Panel: provides expert kno and, in


wledge,

conjun

advice and information to ACCCN on matters ction


rele-

with o

vant to critical care nursing practice relating ur me


specifi-

dical c

cally to patient management;


Paediatric

Advisory

Panel: provides expert es fro

knowledge, advice and information to ACCCN on


matters

olleagu
m
The A
ustralia

relevant to paediatric critical care nursing in addi n and


tion

New Z

to recommending content and speakers for the a ealand


nnual
ACCCN conferences;

Intensi
ve Car

The ICU Liaison Special Interest Group: is ae Soci


collec-

ety

tive group of ACCCN members who have an inter (ANZIC


est

S), the

in ICU liaison/outreach and work together to disc ANZICS


uss

/ACCC

matters relevant to this increasing area of critical N Annu


care
nursing focus.

al Scie
ntific M

eeting
on Intensive Care and the Australian and New Zealand
Paediatric & Neonatal Intensive Care Conference.
ACCCN has a representative on the Australian Resuscitation Council (ARC), and has representation at a federal
government advisory level through the Nursing and Midwifery Stakeholder Reference Group (NMSRG) chaired by
the Chief Nurse of Australia, and is also a member of the
Coalition of National Nursing Organisations (CoNNO).
The founding Chairperson of the World Federation of
Critical Care Nurses (WFCCN) continues to represent
ACCCN on the WFCCN Council, and the College also
has representatives on the World Federation of Paediatric
Intensive and Critical Care Societies, and is a member of
the Intensive Care Foundation.
More information can be found on the ACCCN website:
www.acccn.com.au

ix

(021) 66485438 66485457

www.ketabpezeshki.com

About the Editors


university funding sources. He has published over 8
0 peerreviewed articles and book chapters, and is co-editor
for
two additional books, on nursing and midwifery resea
rch,
Doug Elliott

and pathophysiology and nursing practice.

Doug Elliott is Professor of Nursing in the Faculty

Doug became a Life Member of the Australian Colleg

of

e of

Nursing, Midwifery and Health at the University of Tec


h-

Critical Care Nurses in 2006 in recognition of ov


er 20

nology, Sydney. During his 25 years as a nurse acade


mic,

years of service to critical care. He has previously be


en an

Doug has been a faculty Director of Research, Cl


inical

Associate Editor and on the Editorial Board for Austra


lian

Professor, Head of Department and a conjoint ho


spital

Critical Care, was the inaugural Chair of the Res


earch

appointment as Assistant Director of Nursing Resea


rch.

Advisory Panel, a member of the Education Advis


ory

Prior to this, he worked as a clinician in acute and crit


ical

Panel, and also served on the NSW committee. He is


cur-

care areas in tertiary hospitals in Sydney and Perth.


Dougs clinical and health services research focus

rently on the Editorial Board for the American Journal


of

es on
the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and illn

Critical Care, and peer-reviews for several critical


care

ess
experiences of individuals with critical and ac
ute illnesses, and the use of technologies to improve
patient
outcomes. Doug has received research funding from
the
NHMRC and the Australian Commission on Safety
and
Quality in Health Care, as well as competitive fu
nding
from other national organisations, health service and

medicine and nursing journals, and a range of compe


ti-

tive funding bodies. Doug has been an invited speake


r to
international and national multi-disciplinary critical c
are
meetings on numerous occasions.
Leanne Aitken
Leanne Aitken is Professor of Critical Care Nursin
g at
Griffith University and Princess Alexandra Hosp
ital,

Queensland. She has a long career in critical care nur


sing,
including practice, education and research roles. I
n all
her roles in nursing, Leanne has been inspired by a s
ense
of enquiry, pride in the value of expert nursing
and a

decision-making practices of critical care nurses and a

belief that improvement in practice and resultant pat range of clinical practice issues within critical care and
ient

trauma.

outcomes is always possible. Research interests i Leanne has been active in ACCCN for more than 20 years
nclude

and was made a Life Member of the College in 2006 after

developing and refining interventions to improve having held positions on state and national boards, coorlong

dinated the Advanced Life Support course in Western

x term recovery of critically ill and injured pat Australia in its early years, chaired the Education Advisory
ients,

Panel and been an Associate Editor with Australian Critical


Care. In addition, she is a peer reviewer for a number of
national and international journals and reviews grant
applications for a range of organisations including the
National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC)
and Intensive Care Foundation. She is the World Federation of Critical Care Nurses representative on a number
of sepsis related working groups including an international group who authored a companion paper to the
Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines to summarise the
evidence underpinning nursing care of the septic patient,
the revision of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines
and the Global Sepsis Alliance.
Wendy Chaboyer
Wendy Chaboyer is a Professor of Nursing at Griffith
University and the Director of the Centre of Research
Excellence in Nursing Interventions for Hospitalised
Patients, funded by the National Health and Medical
Research Council (NHMRC) (20102015). Wendy has 30
years experience in the critical care area, as a clinician,
educator and researcher and she is passionate about the
contribution nurses can make to a patients, and their
familys, hospital experience. Her research has focused on
ICU patients transitions and on continuity of care for
ICU patients. More recently, she has focused on patient
safety, undertaking research into adverse events after ICU,
clinical handover and transforming care at the bedside.
Wendy has been active in ACCCN since her arrival in
Australia in the early 1990s. She has been a National
Board member and member of the Queensland Branch
Management Committee. Wendy is a past Chair of the
Research Advisory Panel and past Chair of the Quality
Advisory Panel of the ACCCN. Wendy played a role in
the formation of the World Federation of Critical Care
Nurses and continues to support their activities. Wendy

reviews for a number of journals and funding bodies such

(021) 66485438 66485457

as the NHMRC and the Australian Research Council.

www.ketabpezeshki.com

Contributors
Leanne Aitken RN, PhD, BHSc(Nurs)Hons,

Amanda Corley BN, ICU Cert, GradCert

Clare Fitzpatrick

GradCertMgt, GradDipScMed(ClinEpi),

HealthSci, M AdvPrac (candidate)

Registered Nurse, Registered Midwife

ICCert, FRCNA

Nurse Researcher

BA (Hons)

Professor of Critical Care Nursing

Critical Care Research Group, The Prince

Lead for Critical Care

Griffith University & Princess

Charles Hospital

Liverpool Womens NHS Foundation Trust

Alexandra Hospital

Queensland

Liverpool, United Kingdom

Brisbane, Queensland

Judy Currey RN, BN, BN(Hons) Crit Care

Robyn Gallagher RN, BA (Psych), MN, PhD

Debbie Austen RN, BaHSc, Grad Cert

Cert, Grad Cert Higher Ed, Grad Cert Sc

Associate Professor Chronic and

Critical Care, Grad Cert Management,

(App Stats), PhD

Complex Care

JP (Qual)

Associate Professor in Nursing

Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Health

Registered Nurse, Capricorn Coast Hospital

Deakin University

University of Technology, Sydney

and Health Service

Victoria

New South Wales

Queensland

Jennifer Dennett RN, MN, BAppSc

David Glanville RN, BN, Grad Dip Crit Care

Ian Baldwin RN, PhD

(Nursing), CritCareCert, Dip Management,

Nursing, MN

Post Graduate Educator

MRCNA

Nurse Educator

Intensive Care Unit, Austin Health

Nurse Unit Manager

Intensive Care Unit

Victoria

Critical Care, Oncology, Cardiology, Renal

Epworth Freemasons Hospital

Julie Benbenishty MNS

Dialysis, Central Gippsland Health Service

East Melbourne, Victoria

Academic Consultant Surgical Division

Victoria

Christopher Gordon RN, MExSc, PhD

Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center

Malcolm Dennis RN, BEd, CritCareCert(ICU)

Senior Lecturer

Jerusalem, Israel

Bed Field Technical Specialist

Director of Postgraduate Advanced Studies

Tom Buckley RN(UK), PhD MNRes, BScHlth

Cardiac Rhythm Management Division,

Sydney Nursing School, The University

CertICU, CertTeaching&Assessing

St Jude Medical

of Sydney

Senior Lecturer and Co-ordinator Master

New South Wales

New South Wales

of Nursing (Clinical Nursing & Nurse

Andrea Driscoll RN, CCC, BN, MN, MEd, PhD

Michael Graan RN, GradDip CritCare

Practitioner)

Senior Research Fellow

Clinical Nurse Educator (ICU)

Sydney Nursing School, The University

Monash University, Melbourne

Epworth HealthCare

of Sydney

Victoria

Richmond, Victoria

New South Wales


Wendy Chaboyer RN, BSc (Nu) Hon,

(RCCCPI)

Flinders University

Trudy D

MN, PhD

Griffith Health Institute

South Australia

wyer RN,

Director

Queensland

Wendy Corkill RN

ICU Cert,

NHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in

Diane Chamberlain RN, BN,

Clinical Nurse Specialist

BHlth, GC

Nursing Interventions for Hospitalised

BSc MNSc

Alice Springs Hospital

ert

Patients (NCREN), Research Centre for

(Critical Care), MPH, PhD

Northern Territory

FlexLrn,

Clinical and Community Practice Innovation

Senior Lecturer

MClinEd,

PhD

Bernadette Grealy RN, RM, CritCareCert,

Associate Professor

BN, MN

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of

Clinical Services Coordinator Intensive

Sciences, Engineering & Health

Care Unit

Central Queensland University

Queen Elizabeth Hospital

Queensland

South Australia

Doug Elliott RN, PhD, BAppSc(Nurs),

Melanie Greenwood MN, Grad Cert.

MAppSc(Nurs), ICCert

UniTeach&Learn, ICCert, NeurosciCert

Professor of Nursing

Senior Lecturer,

Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Health

School of Nursing and Midwifery

University of Technology

University of Tasmania

Sydney, New South Wales

Tasmania

Rosalind Elliott RN, BSc (Hons), PG Dip

Gabrielle Hanlon RN, Crit Care Cert, BN,

(Crit Care), MN

GDBL, MRCNA

PhD candidate

Project Manager

University of Technology Sydney

Australian Commission on Safety & Quality

New South Wales

in Health Care
New South Wales

(021) 66485438 66485457

xi

www.ketabpezeshki.com

xii

CONTRIBUTORS

Western Australia
Denise Harris RN, BHSc(Nurs),

Frances Lin RN, BMN, MN (Hons), Marion Mitchell RN, BN (Hon), Grad Cert

GradDipHlthAdmin& InfoSys,

PhD

MN(Res), ICCert

Lecturer & Program Convenor (Master Senior Research Fellow Critical Care

Assistant Director of NursingMedicine &

of

Griffith University and Princess

Critical Care

Nursing Critical Care)

Alexandra Hospital

The Tweed Hospital

School of Nursing and Midwifery

Queensland

Tweed Heads, New South Wales

Griffith University

Margherita Murgo BN, MN (Crit Care)

Karena Hewson-Conroy BSocSci(Hons),

Queensland

Project Officer

PhD candidate

Andrea Marshall RN PhD

Clinical Excellence Commission

Research & Quality Manager, Intensive Care

Sesqui Senior Lecturer Critical Care Nu New South Wales

Co-ordination & Monitoring Unit

rsing

Maria Murphy RN PhD, Grad Dip Crit Care,

Honorary Associate, Faculty of Nursing,

Sydney Nursing School

Grad Cert Tert Ed, BN, Dip App Sci (Nursing)

Midwifery & Health, University of

University of Sydney

Lecturer

Technology, Sydney

New South Wales

LaTrobe University

(Higher Educ), PhD.

New South Wales

Clinical Nurse Specialist

David Johnson RN, Grad Dip (Acute Care

Austin Health

Nurs), MHealth Sci Ed, A&E Cert, MCN

Victoria

Director of Nursing

Louise E Niggemeyer RN, MEd, BEdSt,

Caloundra Health Service

IC Cert, MRCNA

Sunshine Coast Wide Bay Health

Trauma Program Manager

Service District

The Alfred Hospital

Queensland

Senior Researcher

Alison Juers RN, BN (Dist), MN (Crit Care)

Trauma Systems & Education Consultant

Nurse Educator

National Trauma Research Institute

Brisbane Private Hospital

Alfred Health

Queensland

Victoria

Tina Kendrick RN, PIC Cert, BNurs(Hons),

Wendy Pollock RN, RM, Grad Dip Crit

MNurs, FCN, FRCNA

Care Nsg, Grad Dip Ed, Grad Cert Adv

Clinical Nurse Consultant Paediatrics

Learn & Leadership,

NSW Newborn and Paediatric Emergency

PhD Research Fellow

Transport Service

La Trobe University/Mercy Hospital

New South Wales

for Women

Leila Kuzmuik RN, BN, DipAdvClinNurs, MN,

Victoria

Grad Cert HlthServMgt

Anne-Sylvie Ramelet RN, ICU Cert, PhD

Nurse Educator

Senior Lecturer

Intensive Care Services

Institute of Higher Education and

John Hunter Hospital, Hunter New

Nursing Research

England Health

Lausanne University-Centre Hospitalier

New South Wales

Universitaire Vaudois, Switzerland

Gavin D Leslie RN, IC Cert, PhD, BAppSc,

Professor, HECVSant

Post Grad Dip (Clin Nurs), FRCNA

University of Applied Sciences

Professor Critical Care Nursing

Western Switzerland

Royal Perth Hospital

Switzerland

Director Research & Development

Janice Rattray PhD, MN, DipN (CT),

School of Nursing & Midwifery,

RGN, SCM

Curtin University

Reader

School of Nursing and Midwifery

Princess Alexandra Hospital

University of Dundee

Louise Rose BN, MN, PhD, ICU Cert

Queensland

United Kingdom

Assistant Professor

Ged Williams RN, RM, CritCareCert, MHA,

Mona Ringdal RN, PhD, MSc

Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing,

LLM, FACHSM, FRCNA, FAAN

Senior Lecturer

University of Toronto

Executive Director of Nursing and Midwifery

Institute of Health and Care Sciences

Research Director and Advanced Practice

Gold Coast Health Service District

The Sahlgrenska Academy, University

Nurse, Prolonged-ventilation Weaning

Professor of Nursing, Griffith University

of Gothenburg

Centre, Toronto East General Hospital,

Founding President, World Federation of

Sweden

Toronto

Critical Care Nurses

Amanda Rischbieth RN, Grad Dip (Intens

Ontario, Canada

Queensland

Care), MNSc, PhD

Elizabeth Skewes DAppSc(Nursing), CCRN

Teresa Williams RN, ICUCert, BN, MHlthSci

School of Nursing University of Adelaide

Senior Nurse of Organ and Tissue Donation

(Res), GradDipClinEpi, PhD

South Australia

St Vincents Hospital

Research Assistant Professor and NH MRC

Victoria

Clinical Research Postdoctoral Fellow

Paul Thurman RN, MS, ACNPC, CCNS,

Discipline of Emergency Medicine (SPARHC)

CCRN, CNRN

The University of Western Australia

Clinical Nurse Specialist

Western Australia

R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center

Denise Wilson PhD, RN, FCNA(NZ)

University of Maryland Medical Center

Associate Professor Mori Health

Baltimore, Maryland, USA

Auckland University of Technology

Vicki Wade Dip Nsg, BHSc, MN

Auckland, New Zealand

Leader

Mark Wilson DipAppSc (Nursing),

National Aboriginal Health Unit

GDipClPrac (Emergency Nursing), MHScEd

Heart Foundation Australia

Emergency Department Nurse Educator

Sharon Wetzig RN, BN, Grad Cert

Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District

(Critical Care), MEd

New South Wales

Clinical Nurse Consultant

(021) 66485438 66485457

www.ketabpezeshki.com

Reviewers
Steven Frost RN, MPH

Holly Northam RN, RM, MCritCareNsg M Critical Care Nursing

Lecturer, School of Nursing and Midwifery

Assistant Professor of Critical Care Nursing

University of Western Sydney

University of Canberra

New South Wales

Australian Capital Territory

Melanie Greenwood MN, Grad Cert UniTeach&Learn,

Jon Mould PhD candidate, MSc, RGN, RSCN, RMN, Adult Cert Ed

ICCert, NeurosciCert

Senior Lecturer

Senior Lecturer

Edith Cowan University

School of Nursing and Midwifery

Western Australia

University of Tasmania

Helena Sanderson RN, BHSc, ICU Cert, MN(Advanced

Tasmania

Clinical Education)

Nichole Harvey RN, EM, CritCareCert, BN (Post Reg), MNSt,

Lecturer in Nursing

GradCertEd (TT), PhD Candidate

School of Health

Senior Lecturer

University of New England

School of Medicine and Dentistry

Armidale, New South Wales

James Cook University

Natashia Scully RN, BA, BN, PGDipNSc(Critical Care),

Queensland

MPH(Candidate)

Ann Kuypers RN, Med Grad Dip(Clin Ed), Grad Cert (Periop)

Lecturer in Nursing

Lecturer Nursing

School of Health

Academic Language and Learning Unit

University of New England

LaTrobe University, Albury Wodonga Campus

Armidale, New South Wales

Victoria

Kerry Southerland RN, ICCert, BSc, MCN, GCTT, MRCNA

Renee McGill MN, Grad Cert Crit Care, BS(Nurs)

Lecturer

Lecturer in Nursing, Academic Advisor

School of Nursing & Midwifery

School of Nursing, Midwifery and Indigenous Health

Curtin University

Charles Sturt University

Western Australia

New South Wales

Peter Thomas RN, BSc, GradDipEd, PhD

Stephen McNally RN, BApp Sc (Nursing), PhD

Lecturer

Lecturer, Head of Program

School of Nursing, Midwifery & Indigenous Health

University of Western Sydney

University of Wollongong

New South Wales

New South Wales

xiii

(021) 66485438 66485457

www.ketabpezeshki.com

Acknowledgements
and members of ACCCN, for having the belief in
us as
editors and authors to uphold the values of the Colle
A project of this nature and scope requires many tale

ge,

nted

is much appreciated. We also acknowledge support fr

and committed people to see it to completion. The d

om

ecision to publish this second edition was supported ent


husiastically by the Board of the Australian Coll
ege of
Critical Care Nurses (ACCCN) and Elsevier Australia. T
o
our chapter contributors for this edition, both
those
returning from the first edition and our new coll
aborators thank you for accepting our offer to write,
for
having the courage and confidence in yourselves and
us
to be involved in the text, and for being commit
ted in
meeting writing deadlines while developing the d
epth
and quality of content that we had planned. We
also
acknowledge the work of chapter contributors
from
our first edition Harriet Adamson, Susan Ba
iley,
Martin Boyle, Sidney Cuthbertson, Suzana Dim
ovski,
Bruce Dowd,

Ruth

Endacott, Paul

Fulbrook,

Michelle Kelly, Bridie Kent, Anne Morrison, We


ndy
Swope and Jane Treloggen.
Continued encouragement and support from the
Board

text such as this would never come to fruition, thank you.


We acknowledge our external reviewers who devoted
their time to provide insightful suggestions in improving
the staff at Elsevier Australia, our publishing partner.

the text and contributed to the quality of the finished

Thanks to our Publisher, Libby Houston, for guiding this

product.

major project; our Developmental Editors initially

Finally, and most importantly, to our respective loved

Larissa Norrie, and then Elizabeth Coady for the majority

ones Maureen, Kate, Nick and Josh; Steve; and Michael

of the project; and to Melissa Read our editor. In Publish-

thanks for your belief in us, and your understanding

ing Services, Geraldine Minto, thanks for your work with

and commitment in supporting our careers.

typesetting issues. To others who produced the high

Doug Elliott

quality figures, developed and executed the marketing

Leanne Aitken

plan, and the myriad other activities, without which a

Wendy Chaboyer

xiv

(021) 66485438 66485457

www.ketabpezeshki.com

Detailed Contents
5

Ethical Issues in Critical Care


78
Principles, rights and the link with law

78

Section 1 Scope of Critical Care


1

Scope of Critical Care Practice

Development of critical care nursing

Roles of critical care nurses

Clinical decision making

Leadership in critical care nursing

Developing a body of knowledge

11

Summary

12

Resourcing Critical Care

17

End-of-life decision making


83
Brain death
88
Organ donation
89

Ethical allocation and utilisation of


resources

Ethics in research
17

Historical influences

18

Economic considerations and principles

19

Budget

20

Critical care environment

22

Equipment

22

Staff

23

Risk management

28

Measures of nursing workload or activity

30

Management of pandemics

33

Summary

34

Quality and Safety

38

Quality and safety monitoring

42

Patient safety

49

Summary

52

Recovery and Rehabilitation

57

ICU-acquired weakness

58

Patient outcomes following a critical illness

59

Psychological recovery

61

Rehabilitation and mobility in ICU

66

Ward-based post-ICU recovery

68

Recovery after hospital discharge

68

Summary

72

91
Summary
96

Sedation

138

Pain

141

Sleep

145

Summary
8

Section 2 Principles and Practice of


Critical Care
6

Family and Cultural Care of the Critically Ill


Patient

103

Overview of models of care

Essential Nursing Care of the Critically Ill


105

Personal hygiene
Eye care

End-of-life issues and bereavement

107
109

Patient positioning and mobilisation

157
161

Religious considerations

105

Oral hygiene

156

Cultural care

Patient

170
172

Summary
9

110

173

Cardiovascular Assessment and Monitoring


Related anatomy and physiology

180

180

Bowel management

115

Assessment

Urinary catheter care

116

Haemodynamic monitoring

Bariatric considerations

117

Diagnostics

206

Summary

210

Infection control in the critical care unit:


general principles

10

118

Transport of critically Ill patients: general


principles
Summary
7

149

195

Cardiovascular Alterations and Management


Coronary heart disease

123

Heart failure

125

Selected cases:

Psychological Care

133

Cardiomyopathy

Anxiety

133

Hypertensive emergencies

Delirium

136

(021) 66485438 66485457

190

www.ketabpezeshki.com

215

215
227
241
242

xv

xvi

D E TA I L E D C O N T E N T S

243

Tracheal suction

387

Aortic aneurysm

244

Extubation

387

Ventricular aneurysm

245

Mechanical ventilation

388

245

Non-invasive ventilation

389

Invasive mechanical ventilation

392

Summary

404

Cardiac Rhythm Assessment and


Management

12

13

251

Neurological Assessment and Monitoring

251

Arrhythmias and arrhythmia management

252

414

Cardiac pacing

265

Neurological anatomy and physiology

414

Cardioversion

280

Neurological assessment and monitoring

431

Ablation

285

Summary

440

Summary

285

Cardiac Surgery and Transplantation

291

Cardiac surgery

291

Intra-aortic balloon pumping

302

Heart transplantation

308

Summary

319

Respiratory Assessment and


325

Related anatomy and physiology

325

Pathophysiology

333

Assessment

335

Respiratory monitoring

338

Bedside and laboratory investigations

341

Diagnostic procedures

344

Summary

347

Respiratory Alterations and Management


352
Incidence of respiratory alterations

352

Respiratory failure

353

Pneumonia

357

Respiratory pandemics

360

Acute lung injury

362

Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary


disease

15

16

The cardiac conduction system

Monitoring

14

387

Infective endocarditis

Summary
11

tracheostomy

364

Pneumothorax

366

Pulmonary embolism

367

Lung transplantation

369

Summary

374

Ventilation and Oxygenation Management


381
Oxygen therapy

381

Airway support

383

Intubation

384

Tracheostomy

386

Complications of endotracheal intubation and

Pathophysiology
17

Neurological Alterations and Management


Concepts of neurological dysfunction

445

445

Neurological therapeutic management

449

Central nervous system disorders

455

Selected neurological cases

470

Support of Renal Function

21

480

failure

483

Acute renal failure: clinical and diagnostic


486

Renal dialysis

488
501

Gastrointestinal, Liver and Nutritional


Alterations
Gastrointestinal physiology

506
506

Nutrition

509

Summary
20

Management of Shock

556
557
562

Pathophysiology

563

Systemic response

564

Organ dysfunction

567

Multiorgan dysfunction

569

Summary

572

Section 3 Specialty Practice in


Critical Care
22

579

Emergency Presentations

581

522
525

586
587
588

Respiratory presentations

589

Chest pain presentations

591

Abdominal symptom presentations

526

582

Extended roles
Multiple patient triage/disaster

516

Liver transplantation
Incidence of diabetes in Australasia

554

Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome

Retrievals and transport of critically ill patients

513

Liver dysfunction
Glycaemic control in critical illness

551

Triage
508

Nutrition support
Stress-related mucosal disease

545

491

Summary
19

Cardiogenic shock

Summary

Pathophysiology and classification of renal

Approaches to renal replacement therapy

542

Neurogenic/spinal shock

479

criteria for classification and management

541

Hypovolaemic shock

Anaphylaxis
472

Related anatomy and physiology

Patient assessment

Distributive shock states

Summary
18

539

593

Acute stroke
528
539

(021) 66485438 66485457

Overdose and poisoning


Near-drowning

www.ketabpezeshki.com

594
596
612

xvi

D E TA I L E D C O N T E N T S

23

24

25

Hypothermia

614

Special considerations

Hyperthermia and heat illness

615

Caring for pregnant women in ICU

731

Summary

615

Caring for postpartum women in ICU

735

Trauma Management

623

Summary

Trauma systems and processes

623

Common clinical presentations

626

Summary

649

Resuscitation

654

Types of donor and donation

Pathophysiology

655

Organ donation and transplant networks in

Resuscitation systems and processes

655

Management

655

Identification of organ and tissue donors

Roles during cardiac arrest

670

Organ donor care

Family presence during an arrest

670

Donation after cardiac death

Ceasing CPR

671

Tissue-only donor

Postresuscitation phase

671

Summary

Near-death experiences

671

Legal and ethical considerations

672

Summary

672

Paediatric Considerations in Critical Care

27

Organ Donation and Transplantation

746

New Zealand

746
747

Australasia

747
749

Rights

680

Comfort measures

685

APPENDIX A4 Declaration of Vienna: Patient

Family issues and consent

686

763
765

Safety in Intensive Care Medicine

76

768

APPENDIX B1 ACCCN Position Statement (2006)

The child experiencing upper airway

on the Provision of Critical Care Nursing

686

Education

The child experiencing lower airway disease

691

Nursing the ventilated child

693

The child experiencing shock

695

APPENDIX B2 ACCCN ICU Staffing Position

77

Statement (2003) on Intensive Care Nursing

The child experiencing acute neurological

Staffing

696

77

Gastrointestinal and renal considerations in


698

APPENDIX B3 Position Statement (2006) on the

Paediatric trauma

700

Use of Healthcare Workers other than Division

Summary

702

1* Registered Nurses in Intensive Care

Pregnancy and Postpartum Considerations

777

APPENDIX B4 ACCCN Resuscitation Position

710

Statement (2006) Adult & Paediatric


Resuscitation by Nurses

77

711

716

APPENDIX C Normal Values

78

Epidemiology of critical illness in pregnancy

710

Adapted physiology of pregnancy


Diseases and conditions unique to pregnancy

Exacerbation of medical disease associated


with pregnancy

758

APPENDIX A3 Declaration of Vienna: Patient


7

children

758

APPENDIX A2 Declaration of Buenos Aires:

684

dysfunction

757

APPENDIX A1 Declaration of Madrid: Education

Developmental considerations

obstruction

755

Workforce

Anatomical and physiological considerations

26

738

Opt-in system of donation in Australia and

679
in children

729

726

GLOSSARY

78

3
PICTURE CREDITS

79

0
INDEX

793

(021) 66485438 66485457

www.ketabpezeshki.com

Abbreviations
ALT

alanine aminotransferase

AMI

acute myocardial infarction

AND

autonomic nerve dysfunction

ANP

atrial natriuretic peptide

2-PAM

pralidoxime

ANZBA

Australian and New Zealand Burn Association

6MWT

six-minute walk test

ANZICS

Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care

A/C

assist control

A/C MV

assist-controlled mechanical ventilation

AACN

American Association of Critical-care Nurses

AATT

aseptic non-touch technique

ABG

arterial blood gas

ACCCN

Australian College of Critical Care Nurses

ACD

active compressiondecompression

ACE

angiotensin-converting enzyme

ACEM

Australasian College of Emergency Medicine

ACh

acetylcholine

AChE

acetylcholinesterase

ACN

advanced clinical nurse

ACNP

acute care nurse practitioner

ACS

acute coronary syndrome

ACS

abdominal compartment syndrome

ACT

activated clotting time

ACTH

adrenocorticotrophic hormone

ADAPT

Australasian Donor Awareness Program


Training

ADE

adverse drug event

ADH

antidiuretic hormone

ADL

activities of daily living

ADP

adenosine diphosphate

AE

adverse event

AED

automatic external defibrillator

AHA

American Heart Association

AHEC

Australian Health Ethics Committee

AIS

abbreviated injury score

AKI

acute kidney infection

ALF

acute liver failure

ALI

acute lung injury

ALP

alkaline phosphatase

ALS

advanced life support

Society
ANZOD

Australia and New Zealand Organ Donation


Registry

xviii AoCLF

acute-on-chronic liver failure

AV

atrioventricular

AVDO

arteriovenous difference in oxygen

AVM

arteriovenous malformation

AVPU

Alert/response to Voice/only responds to

AODR
AORTIC

Australian Organ Donor Register


Australasian Outcomes Research Tool for
Intensive Care

APACHE

acute physiology and chronic health


evaluation

Pain/Unconscious
BBB

bloodbrain barrier

BDI

Beck Depression Inventory

BiPAP

bilevel positive airway pressure

BiVAD

biventricular assist device

APC

activated protein C

BIS

bispectral index

APRV

airway pressure release ventilation

BLS

basic life support

aPTT

activated partial thromboplastin time

BMV

Bag/mask ventilation

ARAS

ascending reticular activating system

BP

blood pressure

ARC

Australian Resuscitation Council

BPS

Behavioural Pain Scale

ARDS

acute respiratory distress syndrome

BSA

body surface area

ARF

acute renal failure

BSLTx

bilateral sequential lung transplantation

BTF

Brain Trauma Foundation

ASL
AST
ATC
ATCA

arterial spin labelling


aspartate aminotransferase
automatic tube compensation
Australasian Transplant Coordinators
Association

ATN

acute tubular necrosis

ATP

adenosine triphosphate

ATS

Australasian Triage Scale

AV

arteriovenous

BURP

Backwards, upwards, rightward pressure

BVM

bagvalvemask

CaO

content of arterial oxygen in the blood

CABG

coronary artery bypass graft

CAM-ICU

Confusion Assessment Method Intensive


Care Unit

CAP

(021) 66485438 66485457

community-acquired pneumonia

www.ketabpezeshki.com

A B B R E V I AT I O N S

CPOT

Critical Care Pain Observation Tool

xix

CAUTI

catheter associated urinary tract infection

CPP

cerebral perfusion pressure

CAV

cardiac allograft vasculopathy

CPP

coronary perfusion pressure

CAVH

continuous arteriovenous haemofiltration

CPR

cardiopulmonary resuscitation

CBF

cerebral blood flow

CRASH

corticosteroid randomisation after significan

CBG

corticosteroid-binding globulin

CCF

chronic cardiac failure

CCU

critical care unitmay be intensive care,

CRF

chronic renal failure

coronary care, high dependency or a

CRH

corticotrophin-releasing hormone

combination of these

CRP

C-reactive protein

CCU

coronary care unit

CRRT

continuous renal replacement therapy

CDSS

clinical decision support system

CSF

cerebrospinal fluid

CEO2

cerebral oxygen extraction

CESD

Center for Epidemiologic StudiesDepression

CFI

cardiac function index

CFM

cerebral function monitoring

CHD

coronary heart disease

CHF

chronic heart failure

CI

cardiac index

CI

critical illness

CIM

critical illness myopathy

CINM

critical illness neuromyopathy

CIP

critical illness polyneuropathy

CIPNP

critical illness polyneuropathy

CIS

clinical information system

CK

creatine kinase

CLAB

central line associated bacteraemia

CLD

chronic liver disease

CLF

chronic liver failure

cLMA

classic laryngeal mask airway

CLRT

continuous lateral rotation therapy

CMV

controlled mechanical ventilation

CMV

cytomegalovirus

CNE

clinical nurse educator

CNPI

checklist of nonverbal pain indicators

CNS

central nervous system

CO

carbon monoxide

CO

cardiac output

CO

carbon dioxide

COAD

chronic obstructive airways disease

COPD

chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

CPAP

continuous positive airway pressure

CPB

cardiopulmonary bypass

CPDU

clinical practice development unit

CPG

clinical practice guideline

CPM

cuff pressure monitoring

CPOE

computerised physician (provider) order entry

head injury

EC

extracorporeal circuit

CSSU

central sterile supply unit

ECC

external cardiac compression

CSWS

cerebral salt-wasting syndrome

ECG

electrocardiograph/y

CT

computerised tomography

ECMO

extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

CTG

clinical trials group (of ANZICS)

ED

emergency department

CVC

central venous catheter

EDD

extended daily diafiltration

CVD

cardiovascular disease

EDD-f

extended daily dialysis filtration

CvO2

central venous oxygenation

EDIS

Emergency Department Information

CVP

central venous pressure

CVVH

continuous veno-venous haemofiltration

EEG

electroencephalogram

CVVHDf

continuous veno-venous haemodiafiltration

EGDT

early goal-directed therapy

CXR

chest X-ray

EMD

electromechanical dissociation

DAI

diffuse axonal injury

EMS

emergency medical system

System

DASS

Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale

EN

enteral nutrition

DAT

decision analysis theory

ENID

emerging novel infectious disease

DCD

donor after cardiac death

EPAP

expiratory positive airway pressure

DCM

dilated cardiomyopathy

ePD

emancipatory practice development

DDAVP

1-deamino-8-D-arginine vasopressin

EQ-5D

Euroquol 5D

ERC

European Resuscitation Council

ESBL-E

extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-

(Vasopressin)
DKA
DO

diabetic ketoacidosis
oxygen delivery

producing Enterobacteriaceae

DPL

diagnostic peritoneal lavage

ESLD

end stage liver disease

DRG

diagnosis-related group

ESLF

end-stage liver failure

DSC

(MRI) dynamic susceptibility contrast

ETC

DVT

deep venous thrombosis

ETCO2

end-tidal carbon dioxide

EBI

electrical burn injury

ETIC-7

experience after treatment in intensive care

EBN

evidence based nursing

ETT

endotracheal tube

EBP

evidence based practice

EVLW

extravascular lung water

EC

ethics committee

FAED

fully automatic external defibrillator

(021) 66485438 66485457

(o)esophagealtracheal Combitube

www.ketabpezeshki.com

xx

A B B R E V I AT I O N S

HRQOL

health-related quality of life

focused assessment with sonography for

HRS

hepatorenal syndrome

trauma

HSV

herpes simplex virus

FBC

full blood count

HTLV

human T-lymphotropic virus

FDA

(US) Food and Drug Administration

IABP

intra-aortic balloon pump

FES

fat embolism syndrome

IAC

interposed abdominal compression

forced expiratory volume in 1 second

IAP

intra-abdominal pressure

FFA

free fatty acid

ICC

intercostal catheter

FFP

fresh frozen plasma

ICD

implantable cardioverter defibrillator

FI

fear index

ICDSC

Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist

FiO2

fraction of inspired oxygen

ICG

indocyanine green

fMRI

functional magnetic resonance imaging

FRC

functional residual capacity

FTE

full-time equivalent (equivalent to 76-hour

FAST

FEV

fortnight)
FVC

forced vital capacity

FWR

family witness resuscitation

GABA

gamma-aminobutyric acid

GAS

general adaptation syndrome

GCS

Glasgow Coma Scale

GEDV

global end-diastolic volume

GGT

gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase

GI

gastrointestinal

GIT

gastrointestinal tract

GM1

monosialoganglioside

GTN

glyceryl trinitrate
3

HCO

H CO
2

sodium bicarbonate
carbonic acid
hydrogen

HADS

hospital anxiety and depression scale

HAI

healthcare acquired infection

Hb

haemoglobin

HbF

fetal haemoglobin

HCM

hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

HDU

high-dependency unit

HE

hepatic encephalopathy

HFA

Heart Foundation Australia

HFNC

high flow nasal cannula(e)

HFOV

high-frequency oscillatory ventilation

HH

heated humidification

HHNS

hyperglycaemic hyperosmolar non-ketotic


state

Hib

Haemophilus influenzae type b

HIT

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

HME

heatmoisture exchanger

HPA

hypothalamicpituitaryadrenal

HRC

Health Research Council (New Zealand)

LDL

low-density lipoprotein

ICH

intracranial haemorrhage

LDLT

living donor liver transplantation

ICP

intracranial pressure

LFTs

liver function tests

ICT

information and communications

LMA

laryngeal mask airway

LN

liaison nurse

LOC

level of consciousness

technologies
ICU

intensive care unit

ICU-AW

intensive care unit acquired weakness

LOC

loss of consciousness

ICU LN

intensive care unit liaison nurse

LP

lumbar puncture

IDC

indwelling catheter

LVAD

left ventricular assist device

I:E

inspiratory:expiratory (ratio)

LVEDV

left ventricular end-diastolic volume

IES

impact of events scale

LVEF

left ventricular ejection fraction

IgE

immunoglobulin E

LVF

left ventricular failure

IHD

intermittent haemodialysis

LVP

left ventricular pressure

IL

interleukin

LVSWI

left ventricular stroke work index

ILCOR

International Liaison Committee on

MAP

mean arterial pressure

MARS

molecular adsorbent(s) recirculating system

Resuscitation
IMA

internal mammary artery

MASS

Motor Activity Assessment Scale

INR

International Normalized Ratio

MCA

middle cerebral artery

IO

intraosseous

MED

manual external defibrillator

IPP

information privacy principles

MET

medical emergency team

IPPV

intermittent positive pressure ventilation

MET(s)

metabolic equivalent(s)

IPT

information-processing theory

MEWS

medical early-warning system

ISS

injury severity score

MIDCAB

minimally invasive direct coronary artery

ITBV

intrathoracic total blood volume

IVC

inferior vena cava

MIDCM

IVIg

intravenous immunoglobulin

mmHg

JE

Japanese B encephalitis

MODS

LAD

left anterior descending coronary artery

MRI

LAP

left atrial pressure

MRO

(021) 66485438 66485457

bypass
minimally invasive direct cardiac massage
millimetres of mercury
multiple organ dysfunction syndrome
magnetic resonance imaging
multi-resistant organisms

www.ketabpezeshki.com

A B B R E V I AT I O N S

Paw

peak airway pressure

MRS

magnetic resonance spectroscopy

Pv

venous pressure

MRSA

methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

PAC

pulmonary artery catheter

MVC

motor vehicle collision

PAF

platelet-activating factor

MVE

Murray Valley encephalitis

PALS

paediatric advanced life support

NAC

N-acetylcysteine

PaO2

partial pressure of arterial oxygen

NAS

nursing activities scale

PAOP

pulmonary artery occlusion pressure

NASCIS

National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study

PAP

pulmonary artery pressure

NAT

nucleic acid testing

PART

patient-at-risk team

NDE

near-death experience

PAWP

pulmonary artery wedge pressure

NDU

nursing development unit

PbtO2

brain tissue oxygen

NE

norepinephrine

NF B

nuclear factor kappa B

NGT

nasogastric tube

NHBD

non-heart-beating donation

NHMRC

National Health and Medical Research Council

NHP

Nottingham Health Profile

NIBP

non-invasive blood pressure

NIRS

near-infrared spectroscopy

NIV

non-invasive ventilation

NMB

neuromuscular blocking

NMDA

N-methyl-d-aspartate

NMJ

neuromuscular junction

NO

nitrous oxide

NO2

nitric oxide

NOC

nurse observation checklist

NOK

next of kin

NP

nurse practitioner

NPA

nasopharyngeal aspirate

NPP

national privacy principles

NPY

neuropeptide Y

NSAIDs

non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

NTS

national triage scale

NTT

nasotracheal tube

NYHA

New York Heart Association

O2

oxygen

ODIN

organ dysfunction and/or infection

OEF

oxygen extraction fraction

OHCA

out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

OLTx

orthotopic liver transplantation

OSA

obstructive sleep apnoea

OTDA

Organ and Tissue Donation Agency

PA

alveolar pressure

Pa

arterial pressure

PaCO2

partial pressure of carbon dioxide in arterial


blood

PaO

partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood

xxi

PSG

polysomnography

PCI

percutaneous coronary intervention

PT

prothrombin time

PCT

dynamic perfusion computed tomography

PTA

posttraumatic amnesia

PCV

pressure-controlled ventilation

PTCA

percutaneous transluminal coronary

PCWP

pulmonary capillary wedge pressure

angioplasty

PD

peritoneal dialysis

PTSD

posttraumatic stress disorder

PDH

pulmonary dynamic hyperinflation

PTSS

posttraumatic stress symptoms

PDR

plasma disappearance rate

PTT

partial thromboplastin time

PDSA

plan, do, study, act

Pv

PDU

practice development unit

PvO

mixed venous oxygen pressure

PE

pulmonary embolism

PVR

peripheral vascular resistance

PEA

pulseless electrical activity

QI

quality improvement

PEEP

positive end-expiratory pressure

QOL

quality of life

PEFR

peak expired flow rate

QOLIT

quality of lifeItalian version

PET

positron emission tomography

QOLSP

quality of lifeSpanish version

PETCO2

positive end-tidal carbon dioxide

QUM

quality use of medicines

pH

acidalkaline logarithmic scale

QWB

quality of wellbeing

PI

pulsatility index

RAAS

reninangiotensinaldosterone system

PICC

peripherally inserted central catheter

RASS

Richmond AgitationSedation Scale

PiCCO

pulse-induced contour cardiac output

RAS

reticular activating system

PICU

paediatric intensive care unit

RBC

red blood cell

PN

parenteral nutrition

RCA

root cause analysis

PND

paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnoea

RCA

right coronary artery

PNS

peripheral nervous system

RCSQ

Richards-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire

Pplat

plateau pressure

REM

rapid eye movement

PPE

personal protective equipment

RICA

right internal carotid artery

(recombinant human-activated) protein C

ROSC

return of spontaneous circulation

worldwide evaluation in severe sepsis

RRS

rapid response system

RR

respiratory rate

PROWESS
PRVC

venous pressure
2

pressure-regulated volume control

(021) 66485438 66485457

www.ketabpezeshki.com

xxii

A B B R E V I AT I O N S

STEMI

ST-elevation myocardial infarction

RRT

rapid response teams

SVDK

snake venom detection kit

RRT

renal replacement therapy

SVG

saphenous vein graft

RTS

revised trauma score

SVR

systemic vascular resistance

RVF

right ventricular failure

SVT

supraventricular tachycardia

RVP

right ventricular pressure

SVV

stroke volume variation

RVSWI

right ventricular stroke work index

SaO

saturation of oxygen in arterial blood

SpO

saturation of oxygen in peripheral tissues

SvO2

venous oxygen saturation

SA

sinoatrial

SAC

safety assessment coding

SAED

semiautomatic external defibrillator

SAFE

Saline versus Albumin Fluid Evaluation (trial)

SAH

subarachnoid haemorrhage

SAI

State Anxiety Inventory

SAPS

simplified acute physiology score

SARS

severe acute respiratory syndrome

SARS-CoV

severe acute respiratory syndrome


coronavirus

SAS

Sedation Agitation Scale

SBE

serum base excess

SBP

systolic blood pressure

SCA

sudden cardiac arrest

SCI

spinal cord injury

SCUF

slow continuous ultrafiltration

SE

status epilepticus

SEI

sleep efficiency index

SF-36

Short Form 36

SGRQ

St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire

SIADH

syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic


hormone secretion

SICQ

Sleep in Intensive Care Questionnaire

SIG

strong ion gap

SIMV

synchronised intermittent mandatory


ventilation

SIP

sickness impact profile

SIRS

systemic inflammatory response syndrome

SjvO

jugular venous oxygen saturation

SLTx

single lung transplantation

SOFA

sepsis-related/sequential organ failure

assessment
SPECT

single photon emission computed


tomography

SR

systematic review

SSG

surviving sepsis guidelines

STAI

State Trait Anxiety Inventory

UO

urine output
upper respiratory tract infection

SWS

slow wave sleep

URTI

TAFI

thrombin-activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor

ventilation

TB

tuberculosis

V/Q

ventilation/perfusion

TBI

traumatic brain injury

VT

tidal volume
ventilator-associated lung injury

TCD

transcranial Doppler

VALI

TEG

thromboelastograph

VAP

ventilator-acquired pneumonia

TIPS

transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic

VAS

Visual analogue scale

VAS-A

Visual analogue scale Anxiety

shunt/stent
TISS

therapeutic intervention scoring system

VC

vital capacity

TLC

total lung capacity

VC

volume-controlled (ventilation)

TNF

VCv

volume controlled ventilation

TNS

tumour necrosis factor

VE

minute ventilation

TOE

transoesophageal echocardiograph/y

VF

ventricular fibrillation

tPA

tissue plasminogen activator

VICS

Vancouver Interaction and Calmness Scale

tPD

technical practice development

VO2

oxygen consumption

TPN

total parenteral nutrition

VRE

vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus

TPR

temperature, pulse, respirations

VT

ventricular tachycardia

VTE

venous thromboembolism

VV

veno-venous

TSANZ

tumour necrosis factor alpha

Transplant Society of Australia and New


Zealand

TSC

trauma symptom checklist

WBC

TSH

thyroid-stimulating hormone

WCC

white cell count

TST

total sleep time

WFCCN

World Federation of Critical Care Nurses

TT

thrombin time

WHO

World Health Organization

TV

tidal volume

WOB

work of breathing

TVI

time velocity interval

XeCT

xenon-enhanced computed tomography

UEC

urea, electrolytes, creatinine

(021) 66485438 66485457

white blood cell

www.ketabpezeshki.com

SECTION

Scope of Critical Care

(021) 66485438 66485457

www.ketabpezeshki.com

This page intentionally left blank

(021) 66485438 66485457

www.ketabpezeshki.com

Scope of Critical Care Practice

Leanne Aitken
expenditure.2

Wendy Chaboyer
Doug Elliott

Learning objectives
After reading this chapter, you should be able to:

consumables and the rest to clinical support and capital


globally. In our region, there are approximatel

describe the history and development of critical care

y 119,000

nursing practice, education and professional activities

admissions to 141 general intensive care

discuss the influences on the development of critical care

units (ICUs)

nursing as a discipline and the professional development

in Australia per year; this includes 550


0 patient re-

of

individual nurses

admissions during the same hospital episo

outline the various roles available to nurses within critical

de. In New

care areas or in outreach services

Zealand, there are 18,000 admissions per yea

discuss the potential impact of clinical decision-making

r to 26 ICUs,

processes on patient outcomes

including 500 re-admissions.1 Patients admitt

consider processes in the work and professional

ed to coro-

environment that are influenced by local leadership styles.

nary care, paediatric or other specialty units n


ot classified
as a general ICU are not included in these figu
res, so the

Key words

overall clinical activity for critical care is

critical care nursing

much higher

roles of critical care nurses

(e.g. there were also 5500 paediatric a

clinical decision making

dmissions to

clinical leadership

PICUs).1 Importantly, critical care treatment


is a highexpense component of hospital care; one

INTRODUCTION

conservative
estimate of cost exceeded $A2600 per da

There is unprecedented demand for critical care servi

y, with more

ces

than two-thirds going to staff costs, one

fifth to clinical

Critical care as a specialty in nursing has developed over


the last 30 years.3,4 Importantly, development of our specialty in Australia and New Zealand has been in concert
with development of intensive care medicine as a defined
clinical specialty. Critical care nursing is defined by the
World Federation of Critical Care Nurses as:
Specialised nursing care of critically ill patients who have manifest or potential disturbances of vital organ functions. Critical
care nursing means assisting, supporting and restoring the
patient towards health, or to ease the patients pain and to
prepare them for a dignified death. The aim of critical care
nursing is to establish a therapeutic relationship with patients
and their relatives and to empower the individuals physical
,
psychological, sociological, cultural and spiritual capabilities by
preventive, curative and rehabilitative interventions.5

Critically ill patients are those at high risk of actual o


r
potential life-threatening health problems.6 Care of the
critically ill can occur in a number of different locations
in hospitals. In Australia and New Zealand, critical car
e
is generally considered a broad term, incorporating
subspecialty areas of emergency, coronary care, hi
ghdependency, cardiothoracic, paediatric and general intensive care units.7
This chapter provides a context for subsequent chapters,
outlining some key principles and concepts for studying
and practising nursing in a range of critical care areas. The
scope of critical care nursing is described in the Australian
and New Zealand contexts, which in turn have some
influence on clinical practice in Southeast Asia and the
Pacific. Development of the specialty is discussed, along
with the professional development and evolving roles of
critical care nurses in contemporary health care, including
clinical decision making and leadership.

DEVELOPMENT OF CRITICAL
CARE NURSING
Critical care as a specialty emerged in the 1950s and
1960s in Australasia, North America, Europe and South
Africa.4,8-11 During these early stages, critical care consisted
3

(021) 66485438 66485457

www.ketabpezeshki.com

SCOPE OF CRITICAL CARE

e units
primarily of coronary care units for the care of cardiol

was recognised as essential from an early stage,8 an

ogy

d led

patients, cardiothoracic units for the care of postoper

to the development of the nursing specialty of critical

ative

care.

patients, and general intensive care units for the

Although not initially accepted, nursing expertise, abi

care of

lity

patients with respiratory compromise. Later de


the development of a new, comprehensive partne
veloprship
the collective
experience
a steep learning
curv
ments
in renal, metabolic
andofneurological
managem
e
for
ent
the courage to work in an unfamiliar setting,
ledcaring
to the principles and context of critical care that e
xist

to observe patients and appropriate nursing intensity

today.
a high demand for education specific to critic
al care
Development
of critical care nursing was characteris

ation

ed by
the development of technology such as mech
a number
anical of features,4 including:

s the

he
between nursing and medical clinicians

are
now considered essential elements of critical care.12
As the practice of critical care nursing evolved, s
o did
the associated areas of critical care nursing educ
and specialty professional organisations such a
Australian College of Critical Care Nurses (ACCCN). T
combination of adequate nurse staffing, observati
on of

nursing and medical staff

the patient and the expertise of nurses to consi


der the

for patients who were extremely sick a role


that

complete needs of patients and their families is esse


ntial

required development of higher levels of compete


nce

to optimise the outcomes of critical care. As critical c


are

and practice

continues to evolve, the challenge remains to co


mbine

practice, which was initially difficult to meet owing


to

excellence in nursing care with judicious use of t


echno-

the absence of experienced nurses in the specialt

logy to optimise patient and family outcomes.

CRITICAL CARE NURSING EDUCATION

ventilators, cardiac monitors, pacemakers defib


rilla-

Appropriate preparation of specialist critical care


nurses

tors, dialysers, intra-aortic balloon pumps and car


diac

is a vital component in providing quality care to patie


nts

assist devices, which prompted development of ad


di-

and their families.5 A central tenet within this framew


ork

tional knowledge and skills.

of preparation is the formalised education of

There was also recognition that improving patient


out-

nurses
to practise in critical care areas.13 Formal educati

comes through optimal use of this technology was lin

on

ked

in conjunction with experiential learning, conti

to nurses skills and staffing levels.

12

The role of

nuing

ade-

professional development and training, and re

quately educated and experienced nurses in thes

flective

clinical practice is required to develop compete


nce in

Critical care nursing education developed in unison with

critical care nursing. The knowledge, skills and atthe advent of specialist critical care units. Initially, this
titude

consisted of ad-hoc training developed and delivered in

necessary for quality critical care nursing practic the work setting, with nurses and medical officers learne have

ing together. For example, medical staff brought expertise

been articulated in competency statements in in physiology, pathophysiology and interpretation of


many
countries.

electrocardiographic rhythm strips, while nurses brought


14-16

expertise in patient care and how patients behaved and


responded to treatment.12,17 Training was, however, fragmented and fitted in around ward staffing needs. Postregistration critical care nursing courses were subsequently
developed from the early 1960s in both Australasia and
the UK.4,8 Courses ranged in length from 6 to 12 months
and generally incorporated employment as well as specific days for lectures and class work. Given the local
nature of these courses developed for the local needs of
individual hospitals and regions, differences in content
and practice therefore developed between hospitals,
regions and countries.18-20
During the 1990s the majority of these hospital-based
courses in Australasia were discontinued as universities
developed postgraduate curricula to extend the knowledge and skills gained in pre-registration undergraduate
courses. A significant proportion of critical care nurses
now undertake specialty education in the tertiary sector,
often in a collaborative relationship with one or more
hospitals.4 One early study of students enrolled in
university-based critical care courses in Australia21 identified a number of burdens (workload, financial, study
work conflicts), but also a number of benefits (e.g. better
job prospects, job security).
Within Australia and New Zealand, most tertiary institutions currently offer postgraduate critical care nursing
education at a Graduate Certificate or Graduate Diploma
level as preparation for specialty practice, although this
is often provided as a Masters degree.22 In the UK, similar
provisions for postgraduate critical care nursing education at multiple levels are available, although some
universities also offer critical care specialisation at the
undergraduate

level

(for

example,

Kings

College,

London). Education throughout Europe has undergone


significant change in the past 10 years as the framework
articulated under the Bologna Process has been implemented.23 In relation to critical care nursing, this has led
to the expansion of programs, primarily at the postgraduate level, for specialist nursing education. Critical care
nursing education in the USA maintains a slightly different focus, with most postgraduate studies being generic
in nature, including a focus on advanced practice roles

such as clinical nurse specialists and nurse practitioners,

Both the impact of post-registration education on prac-

while specialty education for critical care nurses is under-

tice and the most appropriate level of education that is

taken as continuing education.

required to underpin specialty practice remain controver-

24

Employment in critical

care, with associated assessment of clinical competence,

sial, with no universal acceptance internationally.26-29

remains an essential component of many university-

Globally, the Declaration of Madrid, which was endorsed

based critical care nursing courses.

22,25

(021) 66485438 66485457

www.ketabpezeshki.com

Scope of Critical Care Practice

beginner

competent

specialist

expert

continuing experience/experiential learning

Induction/

Practice

orientation
to critical

short courses/skills updates/in-service education

Training

care
nursing
education
Postgraduate

initial competencies

increasing complexity of competencies


Graduate
Diploma
Masters

Education

Graduate
Certificate
FIGURE 1.1 Critical care nursing practice: training and education continuum.

important in promoting quality critical c


are nursing
by the World Federation of Critical Care Nurses, provi

practice. Practice- or skills-based continuin

des

g education

a baseline for critical care nursing education (see Ap

sessions support clinical practice at the

pen-

unit level.30

dix A for the position statement).5

(Orientation and continuing education issue

A range of factors continue to influence criti

s are dis-

cal care

cussed further in the context of staffing le

nursing education provision, including government p

vels and skills

oli-

mix in Chapter 2.)

cies at national and state levels, funding mechanism

Many countries now incorporate requireme

s and

nts for con-

resource implications for organisations and individ

tinuing professional development into th

ual

eir annual

students, education provider and healthcare secto

licensing processes. Specific requirements

r part-

include ele-

nership arrangements, and tensions between wor

ments such as minimum hours of required pro

kforce

fessional

and professional development needs.13 Recruitment,

development and/or ongoing demonstration

ori-

of compe-

entation, training and education of critical care n

tence against predefined competency standar

urses

ds.31,32

can be viewed as a continuum of learning, experienc


e and

SPECIALIST CRITICAL CARE COMPET


ENCIES

professional development.5 The relationships be

Critical care nursing involves a range of s

tween

kills, classified

the various components related to practice, training

as psychomotor (or technical), cognitive or int

and

erpersonal.

education are illustrated in Figure 1.1, on a conti

Performance of specific skills requires special

nuum

training and

from beginner to expert and incorporating incr

practice to enable proficiency. Clinical c

easing

ompetence is

complexities of competency. All elements are

a combination of skills, behaviours and

equally

knowledge,

demonstrated by performance within a practice s


ituation33 and specific to the context in which it is

Appendix B). The validity of this structure of six domains

demon-

has been questioned, however, as a number of compe

strated.34 A nurse who learns a skill and is asse ssed as

tency statements are linked to several domains.35 Further

performing that skill within the clinical environme research is therefore required to refine the structure of a
nt is

competency model with improved construct validity.35

deemed competent. As noted above, a set of compet Other competency domains and assessment tools have
ency

also been developed.25 Although articulated slightly dif-

statements for specialist critical care practice co ferently, the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses
mprises

(AACN) provides Standards of Practice and Performance

20 competency standards grouped into six do for the Acute and Critical Care Clinical Nurse Specialist,36
mains:

which outlines six standards of practice (assessmen

professional practice, reflective practice, enabling, cli t,


nical

diagnosis, outcome identification, planning, implemen-

problem solving, teamwork and leadership (see


14

tation and evaluation) and eight standards of professional performance (quality of care, individual practice
evaluation, education, collegiality, ethics, collaboration,
research and resource utilisation) (see Online resources).

CRITICAL CARE NURSING PROFESSIONAL


ORGANISATIONS
Professional leadership of critical care nursing has undergone considerable development in the past three decades.
Within Australia, the ACCCN (formerly the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nurses) was formed from
a number of preceding state-based specialty nursin
g
bodies (e.g. Australian Society of Critical Care Nurses,
Clinical Nurse Specialists Association) that provided professional leadership for critical care nurses since the early
1970s. In New Zealand, the professional interests of critical care nurses are represented by the New Zealand Nurse
s
Organisation, Critical Care Nurses Section, as well as
affiliation with the ACCCN. The ACCCN has strong professional relationships with other national peak nursing
bodies, the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care
Society (ANZICS), government agencies and individuals,
and healthcare companies.
Professional

organisations

representing

critical

care

nurses were formed as early as the 1960s in the USA with


the formation of the American Association of Critical
Care Nurses (AACN).37 Other organisations have developed around the world, with critical care nursing bodies
now operating in countries from Australasia, Asia, North
America, South America, Africa and Europe. In 2001 the
inaugural meeting of the World Federation of Critical
Care Nurses (WFCCN) was formed to provide profes-

sional leadership at an international level.38,39 The ACCCN

(021) 66485438 66485457

www.ketabpezeshki.com

SCOPE OF CRITICAL CARE

This section focuses on the scope of critical care


was a foundation member of the WFCCN and a mem

nurses

ber

roles inside and external to the critical care area

association of the World Federation of Societies of Int

, and

en-

provides links to other specific chapters.44 These

sive Care and Critical Care Medicine, and maintai

roles

ns a

include:

representative on the councils of both these internati


onal
bodies. (See the ACCCN website, listed in Online reso
urces,
for further details about professional activities.)

ROLES OF CRITICAL CARE NURSES


As the discipline of critical care has developed, so too
has
the range of roles performed by specialty critical
carer, in Chapters 6, 7 and 8, all practic
care
e-related
nurses.40,41 The continuum of critical illness (see Chap
terocate, in Chapters 5 and 8
educator,pre-crisis/proactive
in Chapter 3.
4) includes
care, management of
the
critical illness, and follow-up care in hospital, clinic an
d
home settings.42 This continuum also includes the pr
actice of palliative care in the ICU environment.43 Clinic
al
(bedside) roles and nurse-to-patient ratios for var
ious
levels of critical care unit, as well as the roles o
f unit
manager and clinical nurse educator, are discuss
ed in
Chapter 2. Practice issues for critical care clinicia
ns are
detailed in the remaining chapters of this book.
Roles
that apply to all nursing professionals are specifi
cally
highlighted; for example:

chapters in Section 2, and the specialty chapt


ers in
Section 3

stration agencies in Australia and New Zealand, with


of critical care outreach or ICU liaison nurse roles (see

similar roles present in the UK and USA prior to this.48

Chapter 2 for further discussion of these services).

Nurse practitioner roles in critical care (or high depen-

In practice, the role of clinical consultant and that of an

dency) range from emergency department practitioners

advanced practice nurse or nurse practitioner can become

through to community-based cardiac failure specialists,

blurred, with hospital administrators believing that one

and, as noted above for the nurse consultants role, often

role can replace the other. Clearly, however, the con-

lack clarity regarding their scope of practice.56,57 Factors

sultants role has a broader portfolio, with a focus on

influencing the establishment of these roles include the

supporting clinical colleagues in providing safe, quality

accrediting process, defining the scope of practice through

patient care, while the role of advanced practice nurse or

specific clinical practice guideline development, prescrib-

nurse practitioner has a direct patient care focus (see

ing rights and the prevailing medical views, and the level

below).

of support provided by health service administrators for

ADVANCED PRACTICE NURSE/NURSE


PRACTITIONER

the implementation, development and evaluation of the


role.48,56 Advanced practice roles in the emergency depart-

Processes for authorisation to practise as a nurse practi- ment are the most well-established in the critical care
tioner (NP) have been introduced by professional regi

consultant

advanced practice48/nurse practitioner roles in ICU,4

45-47

CLINICAL DECISION MAKING


Clinical decision making is integral to critical care nursing

trauma,

domain (see Chapter 22).

49

emergency

50

(Chapter 22), critical care ou practice and forms part of the clinical reasoning process.

t-

Clinical reasoning is

reach /ICU liaison


51

52-54

(Chapter 2)

research/quality coordinator (Chapter 3).


Developing a body of knowledge and the integral role

vel-

of

opment to support clinical care, and facilitating p

research and nurse researchers in that process is des

rofes-

cribed

sional development of colleagues in collaboration

in a later section of this chapter.

with

CONSULTANT

the nurse educator role. The benefits that this role br

Expert clinicians in one of the subspecialties of c

ought

ritical

to the critical care area led to the introduction of a si

care emergency, general ICU, cardiology, cardiotho

milar

racic,

service for non-critical care areas, particularly

neurosciences play important roles in facilit

in the

ating

context of clinical deterioration of patients or for pati

improvements in clinical practice for both critical car

ents

e and

recently discharged from the ICU, with the developm

non-critical care patients. The consultants role

ent

involves
clinical practice, education, quality improvemen
t and
research activities.55 Within these work portfolios, lea
dership and the development and dissemination of know
ledge45,46 within a multidisciplinary team are integr
al to
effective practice.47 Practice includes rolemodelling of
expected behaviours, policy and clinical guideline de

the cognitive processes and strategies that nurses use to under-

are reviewed. Finally, strategies for developing clinical

stand the significance of patient data, to identify and diagnose

decision-making skills are provided.

actual or potential patient problems, and to make clinical decisions to assist in problem resolution and to achieve positive
patient outcomes.58

THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVES ON
DECISION MAKING

Clinical information and prior knowledge are therefore

There are numerous theoretical perspectives on decision

used to inform a decision. This section focuses on the

making, but they can be grouped into two main

decision-making component of clinical reasoning. A brief

categories:

overview of the theoretical perspectives that have been

1. analytical or rationalist

used to understand clinical decision making is provided

2. intuitive or humanistic.

and then studies that focus on critical care nursing

(021) 66485438 66485457

www.ketabpezeshki.com

Scope of Critical Care Practice

and context in clinical decision making.40,62,


The analytical approaches arise from a positivist or ra

63

tio-

expert intuition develops with experience

nalist perspective and focus on analysing beh

and can be

aviours

used to make complex decisions. Both int

and the steps involved in problem solving. Some of t

uitive knowl-

he

edge and analytical reasoning contribute to cli

specific theories that fall into this category include inf

nical deci-

or-

sions.63 Intuitive approaches to decision maki

mation-processing theory (IPT)59 and decision anal

ng therefore

ysis

focus on understanding the development of in

theory (DAT).60

tuition, the

Fundamental to IPT is the premise that reasoning con

role of experience and articulating how nurse

sists

s use intu-

of a relationship between the problem solver and

ition to make a decision. In addition, Australia

the

That is,

n authors64

context within which the problem occurs. This th

have described a naturalistic framework to ex

eory

amine criti-

asserts that relevant information is stored in ones m

cal care nurses decision making, describin

emory

g it as a way

and that problem solving occurs when the problem s

of considering how people use their experi

olver

ence when

retrieves information from both short- and long-

making real-life decisions.

term
memory. Additionally, IPT claims that there are limits

RESEARCH ON DECISION MAKING IN


CRITICAL CARE NURSING

to

Critical care nursing practice has been the foc

the amount of information that can be processed at a

us of many

ny

studies on decision making. As multiple, c

given time. Thus, IPT focuses on understandin

omplex deci-

g how

sions are made in rapid succession in critical c

information is gathered, stored and retrieved. DAT fo

are, it is an

cuses

ideal setting for studying clinical decision mak

on the use of decision trees, mathematical formulas

ing.61 The

and

seminal work by Benner and colleagues40,63,65 f

other techniques to determine the likelihood of mean

ocused on

ing-

critical care nurses. Table 1.1 summarises

ful clinical data. These rationalist approaches foc

10 studies (11

us on

publications) conducted on critical care nurse

diagnosing a problem, intervening and evaluating

s decision

the

making over the past decade.

outcome.61

Of note, 7 of the 10 studies were conducted in

Contrary to the analytical approaches, intuitive appro

Australia,

aches

with two multinational studies also includin

(also termed humanistic, hermeneutic or phenom

g Australia.

eno-

All but two studies66,67 used qualitative approa

logical) focus on the importance of intuitive knowledg

ches such

as observation, interviewing and thinking

aloud. Two
studies reported the types and frequency of deci Other studies indicated that experienced and inexperisions

enced nurses differ in their decision making skills,67,70,71

made during the time period and identified that critic and that role models or mentors are important in assistal

ing to develop decision making skills.72

care nurses decisions were related to interventio


ns and
communication,

61,68

evaluation,

nisation and education.


hat

61

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR DEVELOPING


assessment, orga CLINICAL DECISION MAKING SKILLS
Several strategies can be used to help critical care nurses

68

A further study demonstrated t to develop their clinical decision-making abilities (Table


1.2).73-75 These strategies can be used by nurses at an

critical care nurses generate one or more hy y


potheses

level to develop their own decision-making skills, or

about a situation prior to decision making.69 All t by


hree

educators in planning educational sessions.

studies highlighted the importance of enabling ex In summary, clinical decision making is a component of
pert

the clinical reasoning process that is part of everyday criti-

nurses to provide a narrative account of their pr cal care nursing practice. It involves gathering and analysactice.

ing information in order to arrive at a decision about


a
particular course of action. The analytical or rationalist
perspective of clinical decision making focuses on analysing behaviours and the steps in solving a problem, while
the intuitive or humanistic approach centres on intuitive
knowledge and the context of the decision. In this spe
cialty area nurses are making clinical decisions at a r
ate
of two to three per minute.61,68 Given this, it is important
that clinical decision-making skills be developed through
experience, training and education. Previous research has
demonstrated that a number of strategies, such as ca
se
studies and reflection on action, can be used to assist
nurses in developing these important skills.

LEADERSHIP IN CRITICAL
CARE NURSING
Effective leadership within critical care nursing is essen
tial at several organisational levels, including the unit and
hospital levels, as well as within the specialty on a broader
professional scale. The leadership required at any give
n
time and in any specific setting is a reflection of the surrounding environment. Regardless of the setting, effective
leadership involves having and communicating a clear
vision, motivating a team to achieve a common goal,

communicating effectively with others, role modelling,

Leadership is essential to achieve the growth and develop-

creating and sustaining the critical elements of a healthy

ment in our specialty and is demonstrated through such

work environment and implementing change and inno-

activities as conducting research, producing publications,

vation.76-79 Leadership at the unit and hospital levels is

making

essential to ensure excellence in practice, as well as ade-

quate clinical governance. In addition to the generic strat-

relevant government and healthcare councils and com-

egies described above, it is essential for leaders in critical

mittees, and participation in organisations such as the

care units and hospitals to demonstrate a patient focus,

ACCCN and the WFCCN. As outlined earlier in this

establish and maintain standards of practice and collabo-

chapter, we have seen the field of critical care grow from

rate with other members of the multi-disciplinary health-

early ideas and makeshift units to a well-developed and

care team.

conference

76

(021) 66485438 66485457

www.ketabpezeshki.com

presentations,

representation

SCOPE OF CRITICAL CARE

TABLE 1.1 Australian and international critical care nurses decision-making research
Author [Country]
Bucknall, 200061
[Australia]

200168 [Australia]

Sample
18 CC nurses (range of

Data collection
Observation (2-hour periods)

Findings
Three types of decision:

levels and experiences;

evaluation (51%)

all had completed a CC

communication (30%)

intervention (19%)

course)
12 CC nurses with 2 years

Currey & Worrall-Carter,

Average: 238 decisions/2 hours (i.e. 2.0/min)


Clinical decision record (of

Five types of decision:

CC experience from 3

2-hour periods) and focus

intervention (40%)

units

groups

communication (26%)

years CC experience

and follow-up
interview
Thinking
aloud (2-hour
periods)

Hypotheses
as a framework for decision
assessmentdeveloped
(19%)

[Australia]

CC nurses from 2

semi-structured interview

organisation (13%)

Clinical
processes
education
(2%)

that affected decision making

Average: 395 decisions/2 hours (i.e. 3.3/min)


Aitken, 2003 [Australia]
69

8 expert CC nurses with 5


making
A combination of strategies used to gather data

Currey & Botti, 200670

Observation followed by
metropolitan hospitals;

following the settling in phase post cardiac

18 inexperienced

surgery were:

(3 years) and 20

handover from anaesthetists

experienced CC nurses

settling in procedures

(3 years).

collegial assistance.

15 nurses (13 inexperienced) felt daunted by


decision making while 7 nurses (1 inexperienced)
felt challenged with a sense of being stimulated,
excited and positive.
Currey, Browne & Botti

Same as above

Observation in 2 phases:

Quality of haemodynamic decision making in the 2

(2006)70 [Same study

1st phase comprised

hours post cardiac surgery was influenced by

as above] [Australia]

unstructured, narrative

decision complexity, nurses level of experience,

observational data; 2nd

and forms of decision support provided by

phase comprised a 2-page

nursing colleagues.

structured observation

Experience was a dominant influence in recognising

checklist. Followed up by

patterns of haemodynamic cues that were

interview.

suggestive of complications.
Adherence to evidence-based practice also
influenced quality of decision making.

Aitken, 2008102 [Australia]

7 CC nurses with a CC

Observation and/or thinking

A range of concepts related to the assessment and

qualification, 5 years

aloud, along with follow-up

management of sedation needs. Assessment

CC experience, and

interviews

included:

working 2 days/week

patients condition

response to therapy

multiple sources of information during


assessment

consideration of relevant history

consideration of the impact on physiology and

implications of treatment

pathophysiology

options in treatment.

Hough, 2008103 [USA]

15 CC nurses from 4 units,

In-depth, semi-structured

with varied experience

guide the ethical decision-making process,

and education levels

through reflection-in-action, was critical for


focused ethical discourse and the decision
making.
Enhanced ethical decision making occurred
through experiential learning.

Thompson, 2008

Vignettes with decision

67

Time pressure significantly reduced the nurses

and Australian

whether or not to contact a

registered nurses

senior nurse/doctor. The

working in surgical,

proportion of true positives

decision-making ability between years of generic

medical, ICU or HDU

(the patient is at risk of a

clinical experience.

critical event and the nurse

decision tendency to intervene.


There were no statistically significant differences in

There were statistically significant differences in

takes action) and false

decision-making ability between years of critical

positives (the nurse takes

care experience when participants were not

action when it was not

under time pressure: those with greater critical

warranted) was calculated.

care experience performed better.


Under time pressure, there were no differences in
decision-making ability between years of critical
care experience.

(021) 66485438 66485457

interviews

[various countries]

245 Dutch, UK, Canadian

www.ketabpezeshki.com

The presence of a role model or mentor to help

Scope of Critical Care Practice

TABLE 1.1, Continued


Author [Country]

Sample

Data collection

Findings

Hoffman, 200971
[Australia]

8 CC
4 expert
nurses: 4 novice and

Thinking
period of
aloud
care);
(during
interview
2-hour

Cue usage and clustering during decision making:

Expert nurses collected 89 different cues, while


novices collected 49 different cues.

Expert nurses clustered a greater number of cues


when making decisions regarding the patients
haemodynamic status.

[Iran]

14 CC nurses from 4

interviews

3 themes
were involved
in reasoning
strategies:
Expert nurses
were more
proactive in
collecting
relevant cues to anticipate problems and make
decisions.

Ramezani-Badr, 2009

In-depth, semi-structured

104

[Various countries]

hospitals, currently

intuition

working in the CCU,

recognising similar situations

with 3 years CC

hypothesis testing.

andCanadian
holding
245experience
Dutch, UK,

3 other themes regarding participants criteria to

at least a bachelor of

make decisions:

nursing.

patients risk-benefits

organisational necessities (i.e. complying with


organisational policy even if it meant they were
capable of doing more)

complementary sources of information (e.g.


research papers and pharmacology texts).

Thompson, 2009

Judgement classification

66

and Australian

systems, Continuous (0100)

Critical care experience was associated with


estimates of risk, but not with the decision to

registered
dichotomous
Description
of anurses
clinical situation forratings
whichorthe
clinician has to generateintervene.
questions and develop hypotheses; with

testing74

working in surgical,

ratings on 3 nursing

medical, ICU or HDU.

judgements were used

Nurses varied considerably in their risk assessments,


this being partly explained by variability in
weightings given to information.
Information was synthesised in non-linear ways that
contributed little to decisional accuracy.

action74

Clinicians are asked to reflect on their actions after a particular event. Reflection focuses on clinical judgments made,

TABLE 1.2 Strategies to develop clinical decision-making skills


Strategy

Description

Iterative hypothesis
additional questioning the clinician will develop further hypotheses. Three phases:
1. asking questions to gather data about a patient
2. justifying the data sought
3. interpreting the data to describe the influence of new information on decisions.
Interactive model

74

Schema (mental structures) used to teach new knowledge by building on previous learning. Three components:
1. advanced organisers blueprint that previews the material to be learned and connects it to previous materials
2. progressive differentiation a general concept presented first is broken down into smaller ideas
3. integrative reconciliation similarities and differences and relationships between concepts explored.

Case study75

Description of a clinical situation with a number of cues, followed by a series of questions. Three types:
1. stable presents information, then asks clinicians about it
2. dynamic presents information, asks the clinicians about it, presents more information, asks more questions
3. dynamic with expert feedback combines the dynamic method with immediate expert feedback.

Reflection on
feelings surrounding the actions and the actions themselves. Reflection on action can be undertaken as an individual
or group activity and is often facilitated by an expert.
Thinking aloud

74

A clinical situation is provided and the clinician is asked to think aloud, or verbalise his/her decisions. Thinking aloud is
generally facilitated by an expert and can be undertaken individually or in groups.

highly organised international specialty in the course Leadership styles vary and are influenced by the mission
of

and values of the organisation as well as the val

half a generation. Such development would not

ues

have

and beliefs of individual leaders. These styles of leade

been possible without the vision, enthusiasm and rcom-

ship are described in many different ways, sometimes

mitment of many critical care leaders throughout using theoretical underpinnings such as transactional
the
world.

(021) 66485438 66485457

www.ketabpezeshki.com

10

SCOPE OF CRITICAL CARE

and transformational and sometimes by using le


adership characteristics. Regardless of the terminology in
articulate a personal vision and expectatio
use,
act as a catalyst for chang
ns
some
common
principles organisational
can be expressed.
and implement
standa D
establish
model
effective
leadership
behaviours
through
rds
esired
both
leadership
include
the ability and
to: take
monitor characteristics
practice in relation
to standards
correcognise the characteristics and strengths of

indivi

empower staff

to

act

independently and

change
processes and stable contexts
80-85

elements vary according to leadership style.


satisfied staff, with a high level of retenti
Different of staff through an effective coa
development
on
ching styles for example, transactional, transformat
ional,
authoritative or laissez faire incorporate different c
haracteristics and activities. Having leaders with diff
erent
styles ensures that there is leadership for all stages o
f an
organisations operation or a professions develop
ment.
A combination of leadership styles also helps to
over-

rective action when necessary

come team member preferences and problems e

duals, and stimulate individual development


and
commitment

xpericritical
care personnel are aware of, and willi
ng toenced when a particularly visionary leader leaves
personnel in other areas of the hospital or outside
the . The
challenges often associated with the departure of a l
eader

patients
receive
optimal quality
of car are generally redu
from
a healthcare
organisation
e.
ced in

interdependently

Personal characteristics of an effective leader, re

the clinical critical care environment, where a nu

gardless

rsing

of the style, include honesty, integrity, commitment

leader is usually part of a multidisciplinary team,

and

with

credibility, as well as the ability to develop an open, t

resultant shared values and objectives.

rusting environment.85 Effective leaders inspire their t

CLINICAL LEADERSHIP

eam

Effective critical care nurses demonstrate leadership

members to take the extra step towards achievin

char-

g the

acteristics regardless of their role or level of practice.

goals articulated by the leader and to feel that

Lead-

they are

ership in the clinical environment incorporates

valued, independent, responsible and autonomous in


dividuals within the organisation.

the
general characteristics listed above, but has the

85

Members of teams

added

with

challenges of working within the boundaries creat

effective leaders are not satisfied with maintainin

ed by

g the

the requirements of providing safe patient care 24 ho

status quo, but believe in the vision and goals articul

urs

ated

a day, 7 days a week. It is therefore essential that cli

by the leader and are prepared to work towards achi


effective and safe patient car
eving
evidence-based healthcar
a higher
standard of practice.
e
Although all leaders share common characteristics, s

nical

ome

as

leaders work within an effective interdisciplinary mod


el,
so that all aspects of patient care and family support,

well as the needs of all staff, are met. Effective


clinical

leadership of critical care is essential in achieving:

and mentoring process.81,86

Effective clinical leaders build cohesive and adaptive


work teams.84 They also promote the intellectual stimulation of individual staff members, which encourages the
analysis and exploration of practice that is essential for
evidence-based nursing.85
Clinical leadership is particularly important in contemporary critical care environments in times of dynamic
change and development. We are currently witnessing
significant changes in the organisation and delivery of
care, with the development of new roles such as nurse
practitioner (see this chapter) and liaison nurse (see
Chapter 3), the introduction of services such as rapid
response systems, including medical emergency teams
(see Chapter 3), and the extension of activities across the
care continuum (see Chapter 4). Effective clinical leadership ensures that:

fulfil, their changing roles

hospital recognise the benefits and limitations of


developments, are not threatened by the developments and are enthusiastic to use the new or refined
services

The need to provide educational opportunities to develop


effective clinical leadership skills is recognised.80 Although
not numerous in number or variety, programs are beginning to be available internationally that are designed to
develop clinical leaders.79,87 Factors that influence leadership ability include the external and internal environment, demographic characteristics such as age, experience,
understanding, stage of personal development including
self-awareness capability, and communication skills.80,82,87
In relation to clinical leadership, these factors can be
developed only in a clinical setting, so development of
clinical leaders must be based in that environment.
Development programs based on mentorship are superbly
suited to developing those that demonstrate potential for
such capabilities.80
Mentorship has received significant attention in the
healthcare literature and has been specifically identified
as a strategy for clinical leadership development.88-90
Although many different definitions of mentoring exist,
common principles include a relationship between two
people with the primary purpose of one person in the
relationship

developing

new

skills

related

to

their

career. 91,92 Mentoring programs can be either formal or

decisions, providing emotional and psychological support

informal and either internal or external to the work

and assisting the mentee in the socialisation process both

setting. Mentorship involves a variety of activities directed

within and outside the work organisation to build profes-

towards facilitating new learning experiences for the

sional networks.89,91 Role modelling of occupational and

mentee, guiding professional development and career

professional skills and characteristics is an important

(021) 66485438 66485457

www.ketabpezeshki.com

Scope of Critical Care Practice

11

reported as narrative (where words rather tha


component of mentoring that helps develop future cli

n numbers

ni-

describe the research findings). In contrast

cal leaders.

89,92

DEVELOPING A BODY OF
KNOWLEDGE

, quantitative
research involves the measurement (in numer
ic form) of
variables and the use of statistics to
test hypotheses.

Development of a body of knowledge is a key charact

Results of quantitative research are oft

er-

en reported in

istic of both professions93-95 and the specialties w

tables and figures, identifying statistically sig

ithin

nificant find-

professions. One criterion for a specialty identifie

ings. One particular type of quantitative r

d over

esearch, the

two decades ago by the International Council of Nurs

clinical trial (randomised controlled trial, or RC

es
(ICN)

96

is that it is based on a core body of nur

sing
knowledge that is being continually expanded and re
fined
by research. Importantly, the ICN acknowledge
s that
mechanisms are needed to support, review and disse
minate research.

RESEARCH
As noted above, research is fundamental in the devel
opment of nursing knowledge and practice. Researc
h is a
systematic inquiry using structured methods to u
nderstand an issue, solve a problem or refine existing kno
wledge. Qualitative research involves in-depth examina
tion
of a phenomenon of interest, typically using intervie
ws,
observation or document analysis to build knowle
dge
and enable depth of understanding. Qualitativ
e data
analysis is in narrative (text) form and involves some
form
of content or thematic analysis, with findings ge
nerally

T), is used
QUAL QUANT: both approaches are given e
to test the effect of a new nursing interventio
qual
n on patient
QUAL quant:
qualitative methods are the domin
ant
outcomes. In essence, clinical trials involve:
QUAL quant: the qualitative study is given priori
ty

tial data collection. For example:


1. randomly allocating patients to receive either a

new intervention (the experimental or intervention group) or an alternative or standard interven-

status and data collection occurs concurrently.

tion (the control group)


2. delivering

the

approach and data collection occurs concurrently.

intervention

or

alternative

treatment

and qualitative data collection will occur before quan-

3. measuring an a priori identified patient outcome.

titative data collection.

Statistical analyses are used to determine if the new

Irrespective of which type of research design is used, there

intervention is better for patients than the alternative

are a number of common steps in the research proce

treatment.

ss

Mixed methods research have now emerged as an

(Table 1.3), consisting of three phases: planning for the

approach that integrates data from qualitative and quan-

research, undertaking the research and analysing a

titative research at some stage in the research process.97

nd

In mixed methods approaches, researchers decide on

reporting on the research findings.

both priority and sequence of qualitative and quantitative

Clinical research and the related activities of unit-

methods. In terms of priority, equal status may be given

based

to both approaches. Priority is indicated by using capital

quality improvement are integral components in th

letters for the dominant approach, followed by the

symbols and to indicate either concurrent or sequen-

practice, education and research triad.98 Partnerships

TABLE 1.3 Steps in the research process


Step

Description

Identify a clinical

Review the literature.

A comprehensive literature review is vital to ensure that the issue or problem has not yet been solved and that the
proposed research will fill a gap in knowledge.

State a clear research

Write a research
considerations and the required resources (i.e. budget) for the research are identified.
Secure resources.

Resources such as funding for supplies and research staff, institutional support and access to experienced
researchers are needed to ensure a study can be completed.

Obtain
ethics
problem
or approvals.
issue.

Approval
of the proposed
researchaudits
by a human
ethics
committee
is required
before the study can
Clinical experience
and practice
are tworesearch
ways that
clinical
issues (HREC)
or problems
are identified.
commence.

Conduct the research.

Adequate time for recruitment of participants and data collection are crucial to ensure that accurate data are

question.
Disseminate the
proposal.

obtained.
A concise question includes both the phenomenon of interest and the patient population.
Clear
the proposed
design and
sample and
a plan continue
for data collection
and analysis. Ethical
and description
are vital to of
ensure
that both research
nursing practice
and nursing
knowledge
to be developed.

(021) 66485438 66485457

research findings.

www.ketabpezeshki.com

Conference presentations and journal publications are two common ways that research findings are disseminated

12

SCOPE OF CRITICAL CARE

Research program
issues

& training

Technology

Practice

Patient

development

outcomes

Practice
based practice

Health status/

Evidence-

Patient/family

HRQOL

Policy

Education
assessment
systems
Clinical
information

Competencies

issues
Commonwealth &

evaluation
Product

Credentialling

Impact of
state policies

evaluation

experiences

Ethical &
international factors

Resource

Economic

Impact of

utilisation

evaluation

technology on

Program
legal issues

patient care
FIGURE 1.2 Example of critical care nursing research program.

oherent research program that highlights the major i


ssues
between clinicians and academics, and the implemen

affecting critical care nursing practice is illustrate

ta-

d in

tion of clinical academic positions, including at the pr

Figure 1.2, with identified themes and topic exemplar

o-

s.

fessorial level,

99

provide the necessary infrastructure

A number of resources are available to critical care n

and

urses

organisation for sustainable clinical nursing and

interested in undertaking research. For exampl

multi-

e, the

disciplinary research. A strong research culture in crit

ACCCN provides funding for research on a comp

ical

etitive

care nursing is evident in Australasia, transcendi

basis, with its Research Advisory Panel assessing

ng geo-

grant

graphical, epistemological and disciplinary boundarie

applications and providing feedback to applicants.

s to

The

focus on the core business of improving care for critic

Intensive Care Foundation, whose members are d

ally

rawn

ill patients. Our collective aim is to develop a sustain

from the Australia and New Zealand Intensive

able

Care

research culture that incorporates strategies that faci

Society (ANZICS), the College of Intensive Care Medic

litate

ine

communication, cooperation, collaboration and coord

(CICM) and ACCCN, also has a research funding sche

i-

me.

nation both between researchers with common intere

Additionally, the ANZICS Clinical Trials Group (CTG

sts

and with clinicians who seek to use research findings

holds regular meetings where potential research

in

can be

their practice. A sample of a guiding structure for a c

discussed and research proposals refined. There i

s great
value in receiving a critical review of proposed r
esearch
before the study is undertaken, as assessors co research utilisation approaches, with a description of
mments

evidence-based practice and the use of evidence-based

help to refine the research plan.

clinical practice guidelines. In addition, each chapter in

Over the years, various groups have identified pr this text contains a research critique to assist nurses in
iorities

developing critical appraisal skills, which will help to

for critical care research. A review of this literature id determine whether research evidence should change
enti-

practice.

fied the following research priorities: nutrition sup


port,
infection control, other patient care issues, nursing ro

SUMMARY

les,

This chapter has provided a context for subsequent chap-

staffing and end-of-life decision making.100

ters, outlining some key issues, principles and concepts

While not all nurses are expected to conduct researc for studying and practising nursing in a range of critical
h, it

care areas. Critical care nursing now encompasses a wide

is a professional responsibility to use research in and ever-expanding scope of practice. The previous focus
practice.

101

on patients in ICU only has given way to a broader


Chapter 3 provides a detailed descripti concept of caring for an individual located in a variety of

on of

clinical locations across a continuum of critical illness.


The discipline of critical care nursing, in collaboration
with multidisciplinary colleagues, continues to develop
to meet the expanding challenges of clinical practice in
todays healthcare environment. Critical care clinicians
also continue their professional development individually, focusing on clinical practice development, education
and training, and on quality improvement and research
activities, to facilitate quality patient and family care
during a time of acute physiological derangement and
emotional turmoil. The principles of decision making
and clinical leadership at all levels of practice serve to
enhance patient safety in the critical care environment.

ONLINE RESOURCES
American Association of Critical-Care Nurses, www.aacn.org
Annual Scientific Meeting on Intensive Care, www.intensivecareasm.com.au
Australian College of Critical Care Nurses, www.acccn.com.au
Australia and New Zealand Intensive Care Society, www.anzics.com.au
British Association of Critical Care Nurses, www.baccn.org.uk
College of Intensive Care Medicine, www.cicm.org.au
Intensive Care Foundation (Australia and New Zealand),
www.intensivecareappeal.com
Kings College, London, www.kcl.ac.uk/schools/nursing
World Federation of Critical Care Nurses, http://en.wfccn.org

(021) 66485438 66485457

www.ketabpezeshki.com

Scope of Critical Care Practice

13

Research vignette
Aitken L, Marshall AP, Elliott R, McKinley S. Critical care nurses deci-

Critique

sion making: sedation assessment and management in intensive

The study aim was to identify the concepts and attributes used

care. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2008; 18: 3645.

by

Abstract

Australian critical care nurses in their decision making before and

Aims

after the implementation of a nurse-initiated sedation protocol.

This study was designed to examine the decision-making pro-

cesses that nurses use when assessing and managing sedation for

number of educational strategies were used to support impleme

a critically ill patient, specifically the attributes and concepts used

n-

to determine sedation needs and the influence of a sedation

tation of the sedation protocol including: individual and group

guideline on the decision-making processes.

education; protocol and its supporting evidence placed on the

Background

intranet; laminated copies of the protocol available in the patien

Sedation management forms an integral component of the care of

critical care patients. Despite this, there is little understanding of

care areas; poster reminders; and audit and feedback. The aims

how nurses make decisions regarding assessment and manage-

of the study were easy to identify and clearly stated, but the incl

ment of intensive care patients sedation requirements. Appropri-

u-

ate nursing assessment and management of sedation therapy is

sion of definitions of attributes and concepts would have been

essential to quality patient care.

helpful, because some phrases (such as level of sedation, comfo

Design

rt

Observational study.
Methods
Nurses providing sedation management for a critically ill patient
were observed and asked to think aloud during two separate occasions for two hours of care. Follow-up interviews were conducted
to collect data from five expert critical care nurses pre- and postimplementation of a sedation guideline. Data from all sources were
integrated, with data analysis identifying the type and number of
attributes and concepts used to form decisions.
Results
Attributes and concepts most frequently used related to sedation
and sedatives, anxiety and agitation, pain and comfort and neurological status. On average each participant raised 48 attributes
related to sedation assessment and management in the preintervention phase and 57 attributes postintervention. These attributes
related to assessment (pre, 58%; post, 65%), physiology (pre, 10%;
post, 9%) and treatment (pre, 31%; post, 26%) aspects of care.
Conclusions
Decision making in this setting is highly complex, incorporating a
wide range of attributes that concentrate primarily on assessment
aspects of care.
Relevance to clinical practice
Clinical guidelines should provide support for strategies known to
positively influence practice. Further, the education of nurses to
use such guidelines optimally must take into account the highly
complex iterative process and wide range of data sources used to
make decisions.

and level of consciousness) were labelled as both attribute and

always possible that some would not have been judged to be

concept.

expertby their peers and superiors. It was not clear, however, how

Three methods of data collection were used: think aloud, observa-

the data of the two pilot nurses was actually incorporated into the

tion and interviews. Specifically, during the think-aloud approach,

findings. That is, as their data was only pre-protocol, the reported

nurses wore a collar-mounted microphone attached to an audio-

number of attributes after protocol was implemented could be

recorder and were asked to verbalise their thought processes

expected to be influenced by two fewer participants. This issue was

during the data collection period. At the same time, an observer

not addressed in the report.

recorded the activities that the nurses were undertaking while

The fact that a number of strategies were used to educate the

thinking aloud. A follow-up interview was then undertaken to help

nurses about the sedation protocol should be applauded, as it is

clarify the activities that were observed. Two observers were used

generally recognised that didactic education is not effective in

to collect the data. The qualitative nature of the study and the data

getting clinicians to use guidelines with multi-mode strategies, as

collection methods are accepted methods to examine decision-

in this study. The method used for analysing data that is, having

making processes. The researchers are to be commended for train-

the observers analyse the data they collected, and the investigator

ing the participants in the think-aloud method and for piloting

also assessing the analysis is a strength of the study. The research-

various forms of observational data collection.

ers note that they integrated the think-aloud, observation and

The data from the think-aloud method and the observations

interview data but do not elaborate how this was done, possibly

were analysed independently by the data collector who had

because of the word limit imposed by the journal. Anyone inter-

collected the data for that particular nurse. As part of this analysis,

ested in how this actually occurred would have to contact the

the think-aloud, observation and interview data were integrated

researchers. In their discussion, the researchers note that they were

for each nurse. The actual analysis involved identifying concepts

not able to determine the path between attributes and concepts

and attributes related to three predefined categories: assessment,

(i.e. which came first) or the actual decision-making methods used.

physiology and treatment. All analyses were assessed by the chief

They note, however, that that they were able to identify relation-

investigator and any differences were resolved by consensus.

ships between attributes and concepts. They suggest that their

The sample size five nurses observed twice each (i.e. before and

findings can be used by educators when designing educational

after implementation of the sedation protocol) and two nurses

activities such as concept mapping to help to develop decision-

observed once in the pilot study is appropriate. It is obvious that

making skills in nurses. The findings were clearly reported, the

a very large amount of data was generated. While selection criteria

table was easy to understand and the discussion considered the

were described to identify expert nurses, and included the need

implications of the main findings. Overall, this study provides addi-

to have critical care qualifications and more than five years experi-

tional evidence about the concepts and attributes that critical care

ence, the fact that they self-nominated as expert means that it is

nurses draw on when they are making decisions about sedation.

(021) 66485438 66485457

www.ketabpezeshki.com

14

SCOPE OF CRITICAL CARE

9. Prien T, Meyer J, Lawin P. Development of intensive care medicine in

Learning activities
1. Consider the leaders to whom you are exposed in your

1. Drennan K, Hicks P, Hart GK. Intensive care resources and activity: Aus
tralia &

work environment and identify the characteristics they


display that influence patient care. Reflect on whether

New Zealand 2007/2008. Melbourne: Australian and New Zealand Inte


nsive

these are characteristics that you possess or how you might

Care Society; 2010.

develop them.
2. Mentors are generally individuals who have excelled in

2. Rechner I, Lipman J. The costs of caring for patients in a tertiary referr


al

their chosen profession and who are willing to share their


experiences and expertise with others. Think about your

Australian intensive care unit. Anaesth Intensive Care 2005; 33(4): 477
82.

aspirations in your career as a critical care nurse. With the


help of others, try to identify a potential mentor. Consider

3. Hilberman M. The evolution of intensive care units. Crit Care Med 197
5;

asking this person to meet you on a regular basis to discuss


your professional goals and your strategies to meet these
goals and to provide you with advice.

3(4): 15965.
4. Wiles V, Daffurn K. Theres a bird in my hand and a bear by the bed I
must be

3. Review the strategies outlined in Table 1.2 and develop


a plan of how you might improve your clinical decision-

in ICU. The pivotal years of Australian critical care nursing. Melbourne:


Austra-

making skills. Approach a mentor in your clinical environment and ask him/her to provide feedback over a period of
months on any changes observed in your clinical decision-

lian College of Critical Care Nurses; 2002.


5. World Federation of Critical Care Nurses. Constitution of the World Fed
era-

making skills.
4. Consider the role that you have within critical care and

tion of Critical Care Nurses. 2007:1. Available from: http://www.wfccn.o


rg/

examine the influence that research has on that role. How


might you use research to inform your practice more effectively? Are there strategies that you could implement to

pub_constitution.php.
6. American Association of Critical-Care Nurses. Critical care nursing fact
sheet.

influence the research that is undertaken so that it meets


your needs?

Aliso Viejo CA: American Association of Critical Care Nurses; 2008. [Cit
ed

5. Reflect on your practice in terms of the ACCCN competency


domains14 of professional practice; reflective practice;
enabling; clinical problem solving; teamwork; and leadership. To what extent does your current practice address
these domains? What strategies can you implement to
enhance your practice in these domains?

October 2010]. Available from: www.aacn.org.


7. Australian College of Critical Care Nurses website. [Cited October 201
0].
Available from: www.acccn.com.au.
8. Gordon IJ, Jones ES. The evolution and nursing history of a general int
ensive
care unit (196283). Intensive Crit Care Nurs 1998; 14(5): 2527.

FURTHER READING
Andrew S, Halcomb EJ. Mixed methods research for nursing and the health scie
nces.
Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009.
Thompson C, Dowding D. Essential decision making and clinical judgment for
nurses.
Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2010.

REFERENCES

Germany. J Clin Anesth 1991; 3(3): 2538.

education/doc1290_en.htm.

10. Scribante J, Schmollgruber S, Nel E. Perspectives on critical care nursing:


South Africa. Connect: The World of Critical Care Nursing 2005; 3(4):
11115.

24. Skees J. Continuing education: a bridge to excellence in critical care nursing.


Crit Care Nurs Q 2010; 33(2): 10416.
25. Hanley E, Higgins A. Assessment of clinical practice in intensive care: a

11. Grenvik A, Pinsky MR. Evolution of the intensive care unit as a clinical center
and critical care medicine as a discipline. Crit Care Clinics 2009; 25(1):
23950.

review of the literature. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2005; 21(5): 26875.
26. Hardcastle JE. Back to the bedside: graduate level education in critical care.
Nurse Educ Pract 2008; 8(1): 4653.

12. Fairman J, Lynaugh JE. Critical care nursing: a history. Philadelphia: University
of Pennsylvania Press; 1998.

27. Rose L, Goldsworthy S, OBrien-Pallas L et al. Critical care nursing education


and practice in Canada and Australia: a comparative review. Int J Nurs Studies

13. Underwood M, Elliott D, Aitken L et al. Position statement on postgraduate


critical care nursing education: October 1999. Aust Crit Care 1999; 12(4):
1604.

2008; 45(7): 11039.


28. Gijbels H, OConnell R, Dalton-OConnor C et al. A systematic review evaluating the impact of post-registration nursing and midwifery education on

14. Australian College of Critical Care Nurses. Competency standards for specialist
critical care nurses, 2nd edn. Melbourne: Australian College of Critical Care
Nurses; 2002.

practice. Nurse Educ Pract 2010; 10(2): 649.


29. Pirret A. Masters level critical care nursing education: a time for review and
debate. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2007; 23(4): 1836.

15. Aari R-L, Tarja S, Leino-Kilpi H. Competence in intensive and critical care
nursing: a literature review. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2008; 24: 7889.
16. Bench S, Crowe D, Day T et al. Developing a competency framework for
critical care to match patient need. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2003; 19:
13642.

30. Nalle MA, Brown ML, Herrin DM. The Nursing Continuing Education Consortium: a collaborative model for education and practice. Nurs Admin Q
2001; 26(1): 6066.
31. Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia. Australian Health Practitioner
Regulation Agency; 2011. [Cited January 2011] Available from: http://www.

17. Coghlan J. Critical care nursing in Australia. Intensive Care Nurs 1986; 2(1):
37.

nursingmidwiferyboard.gov.au.
32. Nursing Council of New Zealand. Welcome to the Nursing Council of New

18. Armstrong DJ, Adam J. The impact of a postgraduate critical care course on
nursing practice. Nurse Education in Practice 2002; 2(3): 16975.
19. Badir A. A review of international critical care education requirements and

Zealand. Nursing Council of New Zealand; 2008. [Cited January 2011]. Available from: http://www.nursingcouncil.org.nz/index.cfm/1,25,html/Home.
33. Cowan DT, Norman I, Coopamah VP. Competence in nursing practice: a

comparisons with Turkey. Connect: The World of Critical Care Nursing 2004;

controversial concept a focused review of literature. Nurs Educ Today 2005;

3(2): 4851.

25: 35562.

20. Baktoft B, Drigo E, Hohl ML et al. A survey of critical care nursing education
in Europe. Connect: The World of Critical Care Nursing 2003; 2(3): 857.
21. Chaboyer W, Dunn SV, Aitken L et al. Critical care education: an examination
of students perspectives. Nurse Educ Today 2001; 21: 52633.
22. Aitken L, Currey J, Marshall A et al. The diversity of critical care nursing
education in Australian universities. Australian Crit Care 2006; 19(2):
4652.

34. Boyle M, Butcher R, Kenney C. Study to validate the outcome goal, competencies and educational objectives for use in intensive care orientation programs. Aust Crit Care 1998; 11: 204.
35. Fisher MJ, Marshall AP, Kendrick TS. Competency standards for critical care
nurses: do they measure up? Aust J Adv Nurs 2005; 22(4): 329.
36. American Association of Critical-Care Nurses. Scope of practice and standards
of professional performance for the acute and critical care clinical nurse specialist.

23. European Commission Education & Training. The Bologna Process:


towards the European higher education area. European Commission; 2011.
[Cited January 2011]. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/education/higher-

(021) 66485438 66485457

Aliso Viejo, CA: AACN; 2002.


37. American Association of Critical Care Nurses. [Cited January 2011] Available
from: http://www.aacn.org

www.ketabpezeshki.com

Scope of Critical Care Practice

15

50. Fry M, Borg A, Jackson S et al. The advanced clinical nurse,


38. Williams G, Chaboyer W, Thornsteindottir R et al. World wide overview of

a new model of

critical care nursing organisations and their activities. Int Nurs Rev 2001;
48:

practice: meeting the challenge of peak activity periods. Au


st Emerg Nurs J

20817.
39. World Federation of Critical Care Nurses (WFCCN). [Cited January 2011].
Available from: http://en.wfccn.org.

1999; 2(3): 268.


51. Priestley G, Watson W, Rashidan A et al. Introducing critical
care outreach:

40. Benner P. Designing formal classification systems to better articulate kn


owl-

a ward-randomised trial of phased introduction in a general


hospital. Inten-

edge, skills, and meanings in nursing practice. Am J Crit Care 2004; 13(5)
:

sive Care Med 2004; 30: 1398404.


52. Eliott SJ, Ernest D, Doric AG et al. The impact of an ICU liaiso

42630.

n nurse service

41. Hravnak M, Tuies P, Baldisseri M. Expanding acute care nurse practition


er

on patient outcomes. Crit Care Resusc 2008; 10(4): 296


300.

and clinical nurse specialist education: invasive procedure training


and

53. Endacott R, Chaboyer W, Edington J et al. Impact of an ICU li


aison nurse

human simulation in critical care. AACN Clinical Issues 2005; 16: 89104.
42. Angus DC, Carlet J. Surviving intensive care: a report from the 2002 Brus

service on major adverse events in patients recently dischar


ged from ICU.

sels
Roundtable. Intensive Care Med 2003; 29(3): 36877.
43. Bailly N, Perrier M, Bougle M et al. The relationship between palliative an

Resuscitation 2010; 81(2): 198201.


54. Green A, Edmonds L. Bridging the gap between intensive ca
re unit and

general wards: the ICU liaison nurse. Intensive Crit Care N


intensive care. Eur J Palliat Care 2003; 10(5): 199201.

urs 2004; 20:

44. Ball C. Defining the nursing contribution in critical care. Intensive Crit Ca
re

13343.
55. Elliott D, Giles B, deLeon T et al. Development and impleme

Nurs 2001; 17(2): 656.

ntation of an

45. Ball C, Cox CL. Restoring patients to health: outcomes and indicators of
advanced nursing practice in adult critical care, Part One. Int J Nurs Prac
t

instrument measuring CNCs activities. Aust J Adv Nurs 1992


; 10: 2634.
56. Gardner G, Gardner A, Middleton S et al. The work of nurse

2003; 9(6): 35667.

practitioners. J

46. Ball C, Cox CL. The core components of legitimate influence and the con
di-

Adv Nurs 2010; 66(10): 21609.


57. Middleton S, Gardner G, Gardner A et al. The first Australian

tions that constrain or facilitate advanced nursing practice in adult critic

nurse practi-

al

tioner census: a protocol to guide standardized collection of


care. Int J Nur Prac 2004; 10(1): 1020.

information

47. Fairley D. Discovering the nature of advanced nursing practice in high d


epen-

about an emergent professional group. Int J Nurs Pract


2010; 16(5):

dency care: a critical care nurse consultants experience. Intensive Crit C


are

51724.
58. Fonteyn ME, Ritter BJ. Clinical reasoning in nursing. In: Higg

Nurs 2005; 21(3): 1408.

s J, Jones MA,

48. Lloyd Jones M. Role development and effective practice in specialist and
advanced practice roles in acute hospital settings: systematic review an

Loftus S, Christensen N, eds. Clinical reasoning in the health


professions, 3rd

edn. Philadelphia: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2008. p. 235


meta-synthesis. J Adv Nurs 2005; 49: 191209.

44.

49. Martin KD. Trauma advanced practice nurses: implementing the rol

59. Newell A, Simon HA. Human problem solving. Englewood Cli

e. J

ffs: Prentice-

Trauma Nurs 2004; 11(2): 6774.

Hall; 1972.

60. Kassirer JP, Moskowitz AJ, Lau J et al. Decision analysis: a progress report
.

67. Thompson C, Dalgleish L, Bucknall T et al. The effects of time pressure and
Ann Intern Med 1987; 106(2): 27591.

61. Bucknall TK. Critical care nurses decision-making activities in the natur
al

experience on nurses risk assessment decisions: a signal detection analysis.


Nurs Res 2008; 57(5): 30211.
68. Currey J, Worral-Carter L. Making decisions: nursing practices in critical care.

clinical setting. J Clin Nurs 2000; 9(1): 2536.


62. Benner P, Tanner C. Clinical judgment: how expert nurses use intuition.
Am

Aust Crit Care 2001; 14(3): 12731.


69. Aitken LM. Critical care nurses use of decision making strategies. J Clin Nurs
2003; 12(4): 47683.

J Nurs 1987; 87(1): 2331.

70. Currey J, Botti M. The influence of patient complexity and nurses experience

63. Benner P, Tanner C, Chesla C. Expert practice. Expertise in nursing practi

on haemodynamic decision-making following cardiac surgery. Intensive Crit

ce:

Care Nurs 2006; 22(4): 194205.


caring, clinical judgment, and ethics, 2nd edn. New York: Springer Publish 71. Hoffman KA, Aitken LM, Duffield C. A comparison of novice and expert

ing

nurses cue collection during clinical decision-making: verbal protocol analyCompany; 2009. p. 13769.

sis. Int J Nurs Stud 2009; 46(10): 133544.

64. Currey J, Botti M. Naturalistic decision making: a model to overcome met 72. Hough M. Learning, decisions and transformation in critical care nursing
ho-

practice. Nurs Ethics 2008; 15(3): 322.


dological challenges in the study of critical care nurses decision making 73. Corcoran S, Narayan S, Moreland H. Thinking aloud as a strategy to
about patients hemodynamic status. Am J Crit Care 2003; 12(3): 206

11.

improve clinical decision making. Heart Lung 1988; 17(5): 4638.


74. Narayan S, Corcoran-Perry S. Teaching clinical reasoning in nursing

65. Benner P, Tanner C, Chesla C. From beginner to expert: gaining a differe

education. In: Higgs J, Jones MA, Loftus S et al, eds. Clinical reasoning in

nti-

the health professions, 3rd edn. Philadelphia: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2008.


ated clinical world in critical care nursing. Adv Nurs Sci 1992; 14(

3):

p. 40530.
75. Rivett DA, Jones MA. Using case reports to teach clinical reasoning. In: Higgs

1328.
66. Thompson C, Bucknall T, Estabrookes CA et al. Nurses critical event risk
assessments: a judgement analysis. J Clin Nurs 2009; 18(4): 60112.

J, Jones M, Loftus S et al, eds. Clinical reasoning in the health professions, 3rd
edn. Philadelphia: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2008. p. 47784.
76. Davidson PM, Elliott D, Daly J. Clinical leadership in contemporary clinical
practice: implications for nursing in Australia. J Nurs Manag 2006; 14:
18087.
77. Shirey MR. Authentic leaders creating healthy work environments for nursing
practice. Am J Crit Care 2006; 15(3): 25668.
78. Shirey MR, Fisher ML. Leadership agenda for change toward healthy work
environments in acute and critical care. Crit Care Nurse 2008; 28(5): 66.
79. Crofts L. A leadership programme for critical care. Intensive Crit Care Nurs
2006; 22(4): 2207.
80. Cook MJ. The renaissance of clinical leadership. Int Nurs Rev 2001;
48(1):3846.
81. De Geest S, Claessens P, Longerich H et al. Transformational leadership:
worthwhile the investment! Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs 2003; 2(1): 35.
82. Manojlovich M. The effect of nursing leadership on hospital nurses professional practice behaviors. J Nurs Adm 2005; 35(78): 36674.
83. Murphy L. Transformational leadership: a cascading chain reaction. J Nurs
Manag 2005; 13(2): 12836.
84. Ohman KA. Nurse manager leadership. J Nurs Adm 1999; 29(12): 16, 21.
85. Ohman KA. The transformational leadership of critical care nurse-managers.
Dimens Crit Care Nurs 2000; 19(1): 4654.
86. Tregunno D, Jeffs L, Hall LM et al. On the ball: leadership for patient safety
and learning in critical care. J Nurs Admin 2009; 39(78): 3349.
87. Dierckx de Casterl B, Willemse A, Verschueren M et al. Impact of clinical
leadership development on the clinical leader, nursing team and care-giving
process: a case study. J Nurs Manag 2008; 16(6): 75363.

88. McCloughen A, OBrien L, Jackson D. Esteemed connection: creating a

93. Flexner A. Is social work a profession? Proceedings of the National Conference

mentoring relationship for nurse leadership. Nurs Inq 2009; 16(4):

of Charities and Corrections. Chicago: Hildermann Printing; 1915. p. 578

32636.

81.

89. Taylor CA, Taylor JC, Stoller JK. The influence of mentorship and role modeling on developing physician-leaders: views of aspiring and established physician-leaders. J Gen Intern Med 2009; 24(10): 113034.
90. Williams AK, Parker VT, Milson-Hawke S et al. Preparing clinical nurse
leaders in a regional Australian teaching hospital. J Continuing Educ Nurs
2009; 40(12): 5717.

94. Friedson E. Professionalism reborn: theory, prophesy and policy. Cambridge:


Polity Press; 1994.
95. Brewer L. Bureaucratic organisation of professional labour. Aust N Z J Sociol
1996; 32(3): 2138.
96. International Council of Nurses. Guidelines on Specialisation in Nursing.
Geneva: International Council of Nurses; 1992.

91. Redman RW. Leadership succession planning: an evidence-based approach


for managing the future. J Nurs Admin 2006; 36(6): 2927.
92. Waters D, Clarke M, Ingall AH et al. Evaluation of a pilot mentoring programme for nurse managers. J Adv Nurs 2003; 42(5): 51626.

(021) 66485438 66485457

97. Halcomb EJ, Andrew S, Brannen J. Introduction to mixed methods research


for nursing and the health sciences. In: Andrew S, Halcomb EJ, eds. Mixed
methods research for nursing and the health sciences. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell;
2009. p. 312.

www.ketabpezeshki.com

16

SCOPE OF CRITICAL CARE

98. Elliott D. Making research connections to improve clinical practice [edit 102. Aitken LM, Marshall AP, Elliott R et al. Critical care nurses decision making:
o-

sedation assessment and management in intensive care. J Clin Nurs 2008;


rial]. Australian Crit Care 2000; 13:23.

99. Dunn S, Yates P. The roles of Australian chairs in clinical nursing. J Adv
Nurs

18(1): 3645.
103. Hough MC. Learning, decisions and transformation in critical care nursing
practice. Nurs Ethics 2008; 15(3): 32231.

2000; 31(1): 165171.

104. Ramezani-Badr F, Nasrabadi AN, Yekta ZP et al. Strategies and criteria for

100. Marshall AP. Research priorities for Australian critical care nurses: Do w

clinical decision making in critical care nurses: a qualitative study. J Nurs

Scholarship 2009; 41(4): 3518.


need them? Australian Crit Care 2004; 17(4): 14250.

101. Swenson-Britt E, Reineck C. Research education for clinical nurses: a pi


lot
study to determine research self-efficacy in critical care nurses. J Contin
uing
Educ Nurs 2009; 40(10): 45461.

(021) 66485438 66485457

www.ketabpezeshki.com

Resourcing Critical Care

Denise Harris
INTRODUCTION Ged Williams

Learning objectives

St Vincents Hospital, Melbourne, published th


article
e firston the planning and organisation of an intensi
care unit (ICU) in Australia.1 He identified that critica
ve
ill patients who have a reasonable chance of re
lly
require life-saving treatments and constant nursi
covery
medical
ng and care, but this intensity of service delive
In
Dr B Galbally,
a hospital
not
necessarily
continue
until resuscitation
the patient officer
dies, aat
ry 1966
does
should
nd it not continue after the patient is consider
longer
ed no recoverable.1

After reading this chapter, you should be able to:

describe historical influences on the development of critical

The need for prudent and rational allocation of


and human resources was as import
limited
Australias
first ICU (St Vincents, Melbourne, 1961)
explain the organisational arrangements and interfaces that
ant for
is
for
the
200
or more now scattered across Australi
as
it
may be established to govern a critical care unit
New
a andZealand. This chapter explores the influences o
identify external resources and supports that assist in the development
of critical care and the way this resour
n the
currently
viewed
and used; describes various org
ce
is
governance and management of a critical care unit
tional, staffing and training arrangements that need
anisadescribe considerations in planning for the physical designin
considers the planning, design and equipm
to place;
be
needs
of
a critical care unit; covers other
ent
and equipment requirements of a critical care unit
resource
including the budget; and fini
aspects management
of
describe the human resource requirements, supports and
with a description of how critical care staff may resp
shes
training necessary to ensure a safe and appropriate
ond
care and the way this resource is currently viewed and used
financial

workforce

explain common risks and the appropriate strategies,


policies and contingencies necessary to support staff and
patient safety

discuss leadership and management principles that


influence the quality, efficacy and appropriateness of the
critical care unit

discuss common considerations from a critical care


perspective in responding to the threat of a pandemic.

to a pandemic. First, however, important ethical decisions


in managing the resources of a critical care unit, whi
ch
are just as important as the ethical resources that govern
the care decisions for an individual patient (see Chapter
6), are discussed below.

Key words

resource management

critical care

business case

staf

ETHICAL ALLOCATION AND

competence
credentialling

UTILISATION OF RESOURCES

governance
skill mix

In management, as in clinical practice, careful consider-

budget

ation of the pros and cons of various decisions must be

risk management

made on a daily basis. The interests of the individual

pandemic

patient, extended family, treating team, bureaucracy and

patient dependency

the broader community are rarely congruent, nor are they


usually consistent. Decisions surrounding the provision
of critical care services are often governed by a compromise between conflicting interests and ethical theories.
Two main perspectives on ethical decision making,
deontological and utilitarian, are explored briefly.
The deontological principle suggests that a person has
a
fundamental duty to act in a certain way for example,
7

(021) 66485438 66485457

www.ketabpezeshki.com

18

SCOPE OF CRITICAL CARE

these two extreme positions. This dilemma is true of


to provide full, active treatment to all persons. T

all

he rule

health services, but critical care, because of

of rescue, or the innate desire to do something anyt

its high-

hing

technology, high-cost, low-volume outputs, is under

to help those in dire need, may be a corollary

par-

to the

ticular scrutiny to justify its resource usage

deontological principle. These two concepts, the duty

within a

to

healthcare system. Therefore, not only do critical

act and the rule of rescue, tend to sit well with

care

many

managers need to be prudent, responsible and e

trained and skilled clinicians and the Hippocratic Oat

fficient

h.

guardians of this precious resource they need to be

In critical care there are some families and some

seen

clini-

as such if they are to retain the confidence of, and le

cians who, for personal and/or religious reasons,

giti-

take a

macy with, the broader community values of the day.

strong stand and demand treatments and actions


based
on a deontological view (i.e. the fundamental belief t

HISTORICAL INFLUENCES

hat

An often-held view is that managers in government h

a certain action is the only one that should be consid

ealth

ered

services have no incentive to spend or expand s

in a given situation).

ervices.3

At the other extreme is the utilitarian view, which sug

However, the opposite is probably true. Developing l

gests

arger

an action is right only if it achieves the greatest good

and more sophisticated services such as ICUs can att

for

ract

the greatest number of people. This concept tends to

media and public attention. The 1960s and early

sit
well with pragmatic managers and policy makers.
2

An

1970s
saw the development of the first critical care uni
ts in

example of a utilitarian view might be to ration fundi

Australia and New Zealand. If a hospital was to be rel

ng

e-

allocated to heart transplantation and to utilise any s

vant, it had to have one. In fact, what distinguis

aved

hed a

money for prevention and awareness campaigns. A h

tertiary referral teaching hospital from other hosp

eart
economies
of scale
by cohorting
patie
disease
prevention
campaign
lends acritically
greater ill
benefit
nts
to adevelopment of expertise in doctors and nurs
es who
greater
number in the population than does one

itals

transan ever-growing body of research demonstrating t


plant
hatprocedure.
The appropriate provision and allocation of critical ca

ab-

re

acute hospitals with more than 100 beds. Reasons for

services and resources tend to sit somewhere be

the

tween

proliferation of critical care services include, but are

was, at its fundamental conclusion, the existence


of a
critical care unit.4 Over time, practical reasons for est
lishing critical care units have led to their spread to
most

not
limited to:

Funding for critical care services has evolved over time

to be somewhat separate from mainstream patient


to one area

funding, owing to the unique requirements of critical


care units. Critical care is unique because patients are at

specialise in the care and treatment of critical the severe end of the disease spectrum. For instance, the
ly ill
patients

funding provided for a patient admitted for chronic


obstructive airway disease in an ICU on a ventilator is
very different from that provided for a patient with the

critically ill patient outcomes are better if patients same diagnosis, but treated only in a medical ward. Each
are

jurisdictional health department tends to create its own

cared for in a specifically equipped and staffed crit unique approach to funding ICU services in its jurisdicical
care unit.4

tion.5 For instance, Queensland tends to fund ICU


patients who are specifically identified and defined in
the Clinical Services Capability Framework for Intensive
Care6 with a prescribed price per diem, depending on
the level of intensive care given to the patient or a price
per weighted activity unit, as defined in the business
rules and updated on an annual basis.7 In Victoria, the
diagnosis-related group (DRG) payment for individual
patient types admitted to the hospital also pays for
ICU episodes, with some co-payment elements added
for mechanical ventilation.8 In New South Wales a per
diem rate is established for ICU patients, while highdependency patients in ICU are funded through the hospital DRG payment; in South Australia a flat per diem
rate exists.9,10 Most other states have a global ICU budget
payment system based on funded beds or expected occupied bed days in the ICU. However, within states and
specific health services and hospitals the actual allocation of funding to the ICU may vary, depending on the
nature of the specific ICU and demands and priorities
of the health service.11
The RAND study12 examined funding methods in many
countries and concluded that there was no obvious
example of best practice or a dominant approach used
by a majority of systems. Each approach had advantages
and disadvantages, particularly in relation to the financial
risk involved in providing intensive care. While the risk
of underfunding intensive care may be highest in systems
that apply DRGs to the entire episode of hospital care,
including intensive care, concerns about potential underfunding were voiced in all systems reviewed. Arrangements for additional funding in the form of co-payments
or surcharges may reduce the risk of underfunding.
However, these approaches also face the difficulty of
determining the appropriate level.12
At the hospital level, most critical care units have capped
and finite budgets that are linked to open beds that is,
beds that are equipped, staffed and ready to be occupied

by a patient, regardless of whether they are actually occu-

in a shortage of critical care beds, resulting in a rationing

pied.

of the service available. The capping of beds and qualified

13

This is one crude yet common way that hospitals

can control costs emanating from the critical care unit.

critical care nurse positions can be convenient mecha-

The other method is to limit the number of trained and

nisms to limit access and utilisation of this expensive

experienced nurses available to the specialty; conse-

service critical care.

quently, a shortage of qualified critical care nurses results

(021) 66485438 66485457

www.ketabpezeshki.com

Resourcing Critical Care

19

make
Funding based on achieving positive patient outc

workforce planning and the management of c

omes

all-in/over-

would be ideal, as it would ensure that critical care u

time and fatigue problems difficult for sm

nits

approach

were using their resources only for those patient

manage. The professional isolation and limite

s who
were most likely to achieve positive outcomes in ter

all teams
to of treatment and the inherent
The benefit
d access to

approach

Evaluate the
benefit and cost
education,
training
andof the
peer support ca

ms of

n also create

morbidity and mortality, but such an ideal has not de

morale problems for some members of the te

vel-

am. Further-

oped sufficiently to date. Funding based on healt

more, the diseconomies and isolation require

h out-

empathetic

comes only does, however, raise the risk of encourag

funding processes to recognise the difficulties

ing

unique to

clinicians to cherry-pick only the most profitabl

regional and isolated critical care services.

e or

If such units

successful patient groups at the expense of oth

are to remain viable and capable of deliv

ers. In

ering levels of

private (for-profit) hospitals or countries with very po

safe and effective care equivalent to thos

or

e expected in

health systems, cherry-picking only those patien

larger metropolitan hospitals, then addition

ts for

al funding

whom a successful outcome is guaranteed is likely to

and support is required to compensate for

be
more common, whereas in the public hospitals of mo
st
Western countries an educated guess/risk is often ap
plied
to the decision as to whether a patient should enter t
he
critical care unit or not.
It is vital to note the very important role played by ru

the cost and


tyranny of distance.

ECONOMIC CONSIDERATIONS
AND PRINCIPLES
One early comprehensive study of costs f
ound that 8%
Valueof patients

admitted to the ICU consu

ral

med 50% of

and isolated health services and, in particular, critical

resources but had a mortality rate of 70%, wh

care

ile 41% of

units and outreach services in these regions. Many of

patients received no acute interventions a

the

nd consumed

contemporary activity-based funding formulas are

only 10% of resources.14 More recent Aust

diffi-

ralian studies

cult to apply to these settings. There are diseconomi

show that, although critical care service is

es of

increasingly

scale in such settings as a result of small bed n

being provided to patients with a higher sever

umbers,

ity of acute

limited but highly skilled nurses and doctors, and unp

and chronic illnesses, long-term survival o

re-

utcome has

dictable peaks and troughs in demand, which

improved with time, suggesting that critica

l care service
may still be cost-effective

despite

the

changes in

TABLE 2.1 Approaches to assessing treatment options12

case-mix.15,16

Approach

An Australian study showed that in 2002, ICU pa

Benefitrisk

Description

tients

risks to the patient are assessed to inform

cost around $2670 per day or $9852 per ICU admissi

a decision; this approach excludes

on,

monetary costs.

with more than two-thirds going to staff costs, one-

Benefitcost

fifth

decision to proceed; this approach

to clinical consumables and the rest to clinical s

incorporates cost to patient and society.

upport

Implicit approach

and capital expenditure.17 Nevertheless, some

The medical practitioner provides the


service and judges its appropriateness.

authors
provide scenarios as examples of poor economic deci suggested that if all healthcare provided were appropriate,
sion

rationing would not be required.3 Defining what is

making in critical care and argue for less extrem appropriate can be subjective, although not always. The
e vari-

RAND12,20 group suggests that there are at least three

ances in the types of patient ICUs choose to treat in o approaches that can be used to assess appropriateness of
rder

care (Table 2.1). These include the benefitrisk, benefit

to reduce the burden of the health dollar.

18,19

have

Others cost and implicit approaches.


The first two approaches are considered to be explicit
approaches, while the third tends to be subjective.
However, all approaches have a subjective element. While
the implicit approach is considered to be subjective in
nature,

the

medical

practitioner

must

contemplat

e
benefitrisk and benefitcost considerations but should
also involve the patient/family in the contemplation and
ultimate decision. What is best for the patient is not just
the opinion of the treating doctor and needs to
be
considered in much broader terms, such as the patients
previous expressed wishes and the familys opinion as
de-facto patient representatives. The quality of the
decision and the quality of the expected outcome require
many competing considerations.
The quality agenda in healthcare has argued for bes
t
practice and best outcomes in the provision of healt
h
services, although it may be more pragmatic to consider
value when discussing what is and what is not an appropriate decision in critical care. The following equation
expresses the concept value simply:
Quality
Cost

Benefit Sustainability
Price Suffering

The quality of the outcome is a function of the benefit to


be achieved and the sustainability of the benefit. The

benefit of critical care is associated with such factors as

include such considerations as morbidity, mortality, pain

survival, longevity and improved quality of life (e.g.

and anxiety in the individual, or broader societal costs

greater functioning capacity and less pain and anxiety).

and suffering (e.g. opportunity costs to others who might

The benefit is enhanced by sustainability: the longer the

have used the resources but for the current occupants, and

benefit is maintained, the better it is.21

what other health services might have been provided but

Cost is separated into two components, monetary (price)

for the cost of this service).21

and

non-monetary

(suffering).

Non-monetary

costs

(021) 66485438 66485457

www.ketabpezeshki.com

20

SCOPE OF CRITICAL CARE

uisite
Ethico-economic analyses of services like critical care

knowledge to empower clinicians to manage the

and

key

expensive treatments like organ transplantation a

components of budget development and budget setti

re the

ng,

new consideration of this century and are as im

and to know what questions to ask when confronted

portant

by

to good governance as are discussions of medico

this most daunting responsibility of managing a units

-legal

or

considerations. Sound ethical principles to inform

services budget.

and

TYPES OF BUDGET

guide human and material resource management

There are essentially three types of budget that a ma

and

nager

budgets ought to prevail in the management of

must consider: personnel, operational and capital. Wi

critical

thin

care resources.

BUDGET

these budget types, there are two basic cost typ


es: fixed
and variable. Fixed costs are those essential to the se

This section provides information on types of budget,

rvice

the

and are relatively constant, regardless of the fluctuati

budgeting process, and how to analyse costs and exp

ons

en-

in workload or throughput (e.g. nurse unit m

diture to ensure that resources are utilised appropriat

anager

ely.

salary, security, ventilators). Variable costs chang

As noted by one author, Nothing is so terrifying for cl

e with

ini-

changing throughput (e.g. nurse agency usage or

cians accustomed to daily issues of life and deat

staff

h as to

overtime), especially if used in response to in

be given responsibility for the financial affairs of

flux of

their

demand and resulting consumables such as linen, dr

hospital division!.3 Yet, in essence, developing and m

ess-

an-

ings and drugs.

aging a budget for a critical care unit follows many of

Personnel Budget

the

Healthcare is a labour-intensive service, and critical c

same principles as managing a family budget. Consid

are

er-

epitomises this fact with personnel costs, the most e

ation of value for money, prioritising needs and

xpen-

wants,

sive component of the units budget. The staffing req

and living within a relatively fixed income is common

uire-

to

ment for critical care generally follows a formula

all. This section in no way undermines the skill and pr

of x

eci-

nurses per open (funded) bed. This figure is exp

sion provided by the accounting profession, nor

ressed

will it

in full time equivalents (FTEs): in Australia, the e

enable clinicians to usurp the role of hospital bu

quiva-

siness

lent of a person working a 38-hour week. This e

managers. Rather, the aim is to provide the req

quates

to 5 8-hour shifts per week with an 8-hour acc


rued

the hourly rate of pay and any penalties that are to be

day off every 4 weeks, or 19 12-hour shif attributed to work done during the after-business-hours
ts in a

period. Non-productive hours include sick leave, holiday

6-week period.

leave, paid education hours, paid maternity leave and any

Personnel costs include productive and non-

other paid time away from the actual job that staff are

productive

employed to do.

hours. Productive hours are those utilised to prov Personnel budgets tend to be fixed costs, in that the
ide

majority of staff are employed permanently, based on an

direct work. A manager will determine the minimum expected or forecast demand. Prudent managers tend to
or

employ 510% less than the actual forecast demand and

optimum number of nurses to be rostered per shift a use casual staff to flex-up the available FTE staff estand

blishment in periods of increasing demand, hence con-

then calculate the nursing hours per day, multipl tributing a small but variable component to the personnel
ied by

budget.22

Operational Budget
All other non-personnel costs (except major capital
equipment) tend to be allocated to the operational
budget. This includes fixed costs such as minor equipment, maintenance contracts, utility costs (e.g. electricity), and variable costs that fluctuate with patient type
and number (e.g. pharmaceuticals, meals, consumable
supplies such as gloves and dressings, laundry).
Compared with personnel costs, operational costs in critical care tend to be relatively small, but they can be
managed and rationed with the help of good information
and cooperation. For example, there is a range of dressing
materials available on the market, and a simple dressing
that requires less expensive materials should always be
used unless a more expensive product is indicated and a
protocol exists to inform staff of this clinical need.
Fixed costs can also be turned into variable costs and
hence encourage efficient usage. For example, pressurereduction mattresses, traditionally purchased as a fixed
asset with variable (and unpredictable) repair and maintenance costs, can now be leased on a per-day or per-week
basis, with no need for storage, cleaning or maintenance
costs. Further, critical care managers can work with other
hospital managers to create purchasing power by cooperating to standardise the range of products used to obtain
a better price for a product that will benefit all users.

Capital Budget
Capital budget items are generally expensive and/or large
fixed assets that are considered long-term investments,
such as building extensions, renovations and large equipment purchases. Capital budget items tend to be considered as assets that are depreciated over time. Most
hospitals consider these items as a global asset that is,

as a group of investment items and activities for the hos-

whether it replaces an existing items service or function,

pital rather than attributing these costs to an individual

the cost, possible revenue and cost-mitigating benefits.

unit or department.

This analysis does not always have to demonstrate a

To request a capital budget item, a written proposal is

profit, although the value and benefit of the service would

required

describing

the

item,

its

expected

benefits, need to be established.

(021) 66485438 66485457

www.ketabpezeshki.com

Resourcing Critical Care

21

non-productive), and operational (fixed and

BUDGET PROCESS

variable)

The budget includes three fundamental steps: bu

costs, should be matched against other kn

dget

own measur-

preparation and approval, budget analysis and report

able indicators of activity or productivity (

ing,

e.g. patient

and budget control or action.

bed-days, patient types/DRGs and staffing ho

Budget Preparation and Approval

urs, includ-

A budget plan essentially runs in parallel with a unit o

ing overtime and other special payments).3

One common management maxim is: if it

service management plan, forecasting likely activi

cannot be

ty and

measured, then it cannot be controlled. Clinic

resulting financial costs. In most circumstances t

al manag-

he pre-

ers therefore need to work closely with financ

ceding years activity and costs are a good benchmar

e managers

k on

to develop consistent data measurements an

which to base the next years budget. However,

d reports to

hospital

inform themselves and staff about where t

expectations in terms of new services, greater p

hey should

atient

focus their efforts to achieve the approved bu

throughput or changes to staff entitlements will need

dget target.

to

Budget Control and Action

be factored into the new budget.

When signs of poor performance or financial o

The budget period is generally a financial year, but d

verrun are

evel-

evident, managers cannot merely analyse

oping monthly budgets (cash flowing) to coincide

the financial

with

reports, hoping that things will sort themselve

predictable variations allows for a more realistic repr

s out. Every

esen-

variance of a sizeable amount requires an

tation of how costs are incurred and paid throughout

explanation.

the

Some will be obvious: an outbreak of commun

financial year period. If the budget plan is well constr

ity influ-

ucted,

enza among staff will increase sick leave and

one always hopes and expects the final budget alloca

casual staff

tion

costs for a period of time. Other overruns can

(i.e. the approved budget) to be close to achievable.

be insidious

Budget Analysis and Reporting

but no less important: overtime payme

Most critical care managers analyse their exp

nts, although

enditure

sometimes unavoidable, can also reflect poor

against budget projections on a monthly basis, to ide

time man-

ntify

agement or a culture of some staff wanting to

variances from planned expenditure. Information sho

boost their

uld

income surreptitiously.22

not merely be financial: a breakdown of the monthly

An effectivemethod of controlling the

and
year-to-date expenditures for personnel
(productive and

budget is
actively to engage staff in the process
of managing

costs. Managers can explain to staff how the budget


has

responsibility for the budget performance can encourage

been developed and how their performance a an esprit de corps and improvements from the whole
gainst

team that a single manager cannot achieve alone.

budget is progressing, and identify areas for poteDEVELOPING


ntial

A BUSINESS CASE

The most common reason for writing a business case is

improvement. Seeking ideas from staff on how to im to justify the resources and capital expenditure to gain
prove

the support and/or approval for a change in service provi-

efficiency and productivity and giving them some

sion and/or purchase of a significant new piece of


equipment/technology. This section provides an overview
of a business case and a format for its presentation. The
business case can be an invaluable tool in the strateg
ic
decision-making process, particularly in an environment
of constrained resources.23
A business case is a management tool that is used in the
process of meeting the overall strategic plan of an organisation. Within a setting such as healthcare, the business
case is required to outline clearly the clinical need an
d
implications to be understood by leaders. Financial
imperatives, such as return on investment, must also be
defined and identified.2325 A business case is a document
in which all the facts relevant to the case are documented
and linked cohesively. Various templates are available
(see Online Resources) to assist with the layout. Key questions are generally the starting point for the response to
a business case: why, what, when, where and how, with
each questions response adding additional information
to the process (Table 2.2). Business cases can vary in
length from many pages to just a couple. Most organisations will have standardised headings and formats for the
presentation of these documents. If the document
is
lengthy, the inclusion of an executive summary is recommended, to summarise the salient points of the business
case (Box 2.1).

TABLE 2.2 Key questions in writing a business case


Question

Example

Why?

What is the background to the project, and why is it


needed: PEST (political, economic, sociological,
technological) and SWOT (strengths, weaknesses,
opportunities and threats) analysis?

What?

Clearly identify and define the project and the


purpose of the business case and outline the
solution. Clearly defined, measurable benefits
should be documented; goals and outcomes.

What if?

A risk assessment of the current situation, including

any controls currently in place to address/mitigate

undertaken, if not already included in the

the issue, and a risk assessment following the

background material?

implementation of the proposed solution.


When?

Where?

What are the timelines for the implementation and

How?

How much money, people and equipment, for


example, will be required to achieve the benefits?

achievement of the project/solution?

A clear costbenefit analysis should be included in

What is the context within which the project will be

response to this question.

(021) 66485438 66485457

www.ketabpezeshki.com

22

SCOPE OF CRITICAL CARE

onal
policies of each individual facility. In smaller facili

BOX 2.1

Business case: sample headings

ties,

Title

the broad spectrum of critical care may be provi

Purpose

ded in

Background

combined units (intensive care, high-dependency,

Key issues

coro-

Costbenefit analysis

nary care) to improve flexibility and aid the efficient

Recommendations

use

Risk assessment

of available resources.26

ORGANISATIONAL DESIGN
The functional organisational and unit designs ar
e govIn summary, the business case is an important tool t

erned by available finances, an operational brief and

hat

the

is increasingly required at all levels of an organisatio

building and design standards of the state or country

n to

in

clearly define a proposed change or purchase. This d

which the hospital is located. A critical care unit shou

ocu-

ld

ment should include clear goals and outcomes, a

have access to minimum support facilities, which incl

cost-

ude

benefit analysis and timelines for achievement of


the

staff station, clean utility, dirty utility, store room


(s),

solution.

education and teaching space, staff amenities, pa

CRITICAL CARE ENVIRONMENT

tients
ensuites, patients bathroom, linen storage, dis

A critical care unit is a distinct unit within a hospital t

posal

hat

room, sub-pathology area and offices. Most notably, t

has easy access to the emergency department, o

he

perating

actual bed space/care area for patients needs to

theatre and medical imaging. It provides care to pati

be well

ents

designed.26

with a life-threatening illness or injury and concentrat

The design of the patients bed-space has received c

es

onsid-

the clinical expertise and technological and thera

erable attention in the past few years. In Australia, m

peutic

ost

resources required.

26

The College of Intensive Care M

state governments have developed minimum guid

edi-

elines

cine (CICM) defines three levels of intensive

to assist in the design process. Each bed space shoul

care to

d be

support the role delineation of a particular h

a minimum of 20 square metres and provide for

ospital,

visual

dependent upon staffing expertise, facilities and supp

privacy from casual observation. At least one handba

ort

sin

services.

27

Critical care facilities vary in nature and ex

per single room or per two beds should be provi

tent

ded

between hospitals and are dependent on the operati

to meet minimum infection control guidelines.26 E

ach
bed space should have piped medical gases (oxygen
and

TABLE 2.3 Basic equipment requirements

air), suction, adequate electrical outlets (essential

Monitoring

and

Monitors (including central station)

Therapeutic
Ventilators (invasive and

End-tidal CO2 monitoring


Arterial blood gas analyser
(electrolytes)
Invasive monitoring

arterial

central venous pressure

intracranial pressure

PiCCO

pulmonary artery

non-invasive)
Infusion pumps
Syringe drivers
CVVHDF
EDD-f
Resuscitators
Temporary pacemaker
Defibrillator
Suctioning apparatus

Access to image intensifier


Ultrasound
Access to CT/MRI
CT computerised tomography; CVVHDF continuous veno-venous
haemodiafiltration; EDD-f extended daily dialysis filtration; MRI
magnetic resonance imaging; PiCCO pulse-induced contour cardiac
output.

non-essential), data points and task lighting sufficient for


use during the performance of bedside procedures.
Further detailed descriptions are available in various
health department documents.26

EQUIPMENT
Since the advent of critical care units, healthcare delivery
has become increasingly dependent on medical technology to deliver that care. Equipment can be categorised
into several funding groups: capital expenditure (generally in excess of $10,000), equipment expenditure (all
equipment less than $10,000), and the disposable products and devices required to support the use of equipment. This section examines how to evaluate, procure and
maintain that equipment.

INITIAL SET-UP REQUIREMENTS


Critical care units require baseline equipment that allows
the unit to deliver safe and effective patient care. The list
of specific equipment required by each individual unit
will be governed by the scope of that units function. For
example, a unit that provides care to patients after neurosurgery will require the ability to monitor intracranial
pressure. Table 2.3 lists the basic equipment requirements
for a critical care unit.

PURCHASING
The procurement of any equipment or medical device

requires a rigorous process of selection and evaluation.

most healthcare facilities, a product evaluation commit-

This process should be designed to select functional, reli-

tee exists to support this process, but if this is not the case

able products that are safe, cost-effective and environ-

it is strongly recommended that a multidisciplinary com-

mentally conscious and that promote quality of care

mittee be set up, particularly when considering the pur-

while avoiding duplication or rapid obsolescence.28 In

chase of equipment requiring capital expenditure.29

(021) 66485438 66485457

www.ketabpezeshki.com

Resourcing Critical Care

23

The decision to purchase or lease equipment


will, to some

BOX 2.2 Example criteria for product


28,29
evaluation
Safety

Performance
Quality
Use

Costbenefit analysis
purpose

Cleaning
ease of

gy approved
by the hospital or state government. The
advantages of
leasing equipment include the capital expendi
ture being
defrayed over the life of the lease (usuall
y 36 months),
with ongoing servicing and product upgrad

include disposables
Regulatory
control

es built into
the lease agreement and price structure. Any

central sterilising
unit (CSSU)
Adaptability
to future supply
technological
advancements
Service
agreements

infection
control
Training requirements

extent, be governed by the purchasing strate

final presentation from the product evaluation commit


tee should

Therapeutic Goods Administration

therefore include a recommendation to purch

Australian Standards

ase or lease,

based on a costbenefit analysis of the ongoin

g expendi-

ture required to maintain the equipment.

REPLACEMENT AND MAINTENANCE


The process for replacement of equipm
The product evaluation committee should include

ent is closely

members who have an interest in the equipment

aligned with the process for the purchase of n

being

ew equip-

considered and should comprise, for example, biome

ment. The stimulus for the process to begin, h

di-

owever, can

cal engineers and representatives from the central st

be either the condemning of equipment b

erile

y biomedical

supply unit (CSSU), administration, infection contr

engineers or the planned replacement

ol,

of equipment

end users and other departments that may have

nearing the end of its life cycle. In general, ca

similar

pital equip-

needs. Once a product evaluation committee has

ment is deemed to have a life cycle of five ye

been

ars. This time

established, clear, objective criteria for the evaluatio

frame takes into account both the longevity of

n of

the physi-

the product should be determined (Box 2.2). Ideally, t

cal equipment and its technology.

he

Ongoing maintenance of equipment is an imp

committee will screen products and medical d

ortant part

evices

of facilitating safety within the unit. Maintena

before a clinical evaluation is conducted to estab

nce may be

lish its
viability, thus avoiding any unnecessary expendit
ure in
time and money.28

ence patient outcomes both directly, through the initiaprovided in-house by individual facility biomedical

tion of appropriate nursing care strategies, and indirectly,

departments or as part of a service contract arrangement

by mediating and implementing the care strategies of

with the vendor company. The provision of a maintenance/

other members of the multidisciplinary healthcare team.

service plan should be clearly identified during the pro-

Therefore, ensuring an appropriate skill mix is an impor-

curement phase of the equipments purchase process.

tant aspect of unit management. This section consider

While equipment maintenance is not the direct respon-

sibility of the nurses in charge of the unit, they should be

how appropriate staffing levels are determined and the

aware of the maintenance plan for all equipment and

factors, such as nursepatient ratios and skill mix, that

ensure that timely maintenance is undertaken.

influence them.

Routine ongoing care of equipment is outlined in the


product information and user manuals that accompany

STAFFING ROLES

devices. This documentation clearly outlines routine care

There are a number of different nursing roles in the ICU

required for cleaning, storage and maintenance. All staff

nursing team, and various guidelines determine the

involved in the maintenance of clinical equipment should

requirements of these roles. Both the Australian College

be trained and competent to carry it out. As specialist

of Critical Care Nurses (ACCCN) (see Appendix B2) and

equipment is a fundamental element of critical care,

the World Federation of Critical Care Nurses (WFCCN)

effective resourcing includes consideration of the pur-

(see Appendix A2) have position statements surrounding

chase, set-up, maintenance and replacement of equip-

the critical care workforce and staffing. A designat

ment. Equipment is therefore an important aspect of the

ed

budget process.

nursing manager (nursing unit manager/clinical nurse


consultant/nurse

practice

coordinator/clinical

nurse

manager, or equivalent title) is required for each unit to

STAFF

direct and guide clinical practice. The nurse manager

Staffing critical care units is an important human resource

must possess a post-registration qualification in critical

consideration. The focus of this section is on nursing

care or in the clinical specialty of the unit.27,30 A clinical

staff, although the important role that medical staff and

nurse educator (CNE) should be available in each unit.

other ancillary health personnel provide is acknowledged.

The ACCCN recommends a minimum ratio of one full-

Nurses salaries consume a considerable portion of any

time equivalent (FTE) CNE for every 50 nurses on the

unit budget and, owing to the constant presence of nurses

roster, to provide unit-based education and staff develop-

at the bedside, appropriate staffing plays a significant role

ment.27,30 The clinical nurse consultant (CNC) role is

in the quality of care delivered. Nurse staffing levels influ-

utilised at the unit, hospital and area health service level

(021) 66485438 66485457

www.ketabpezeshki.com

24

SCOPE OF CRITICAL CARE

such
to provide resources, education and leadership.30

as the population served, the services provided

Regis-

by the

tered nurses within the unit are generally nurses

hospital and by its neighbouring hospitals, and the su

with

b-

formal critical care postgraduate

specialties of medical staff working at each hospital a

qualifications

and

lso

varying levels of critical care experience.

influence staffing. Specific issues to be considered

Prior to the mid-1990s, when specialist critical care n

include nurse-to-patient ratios, nursing compete

urse

ncies

education moved into the tertiary education sector, c

and skill mix.

riti-

The starting point for most units in the establishment

cal care education took the form of hospital-based ce

of

rtifi-

minimum, or base, staffing levels is the patient

cates.

31

Since this move, postgraduate, university-

census

based

approach. This approach uses the number and classi

programs at the graduate certificate or postgr

fica-

aduate

tion (ICU or HDU) of patients within the unit to deter-

diploma level are now available, although some hosp

mine the number of nurses required to be roster

ital-

ed on

based courses that articulate to formal university

duty on any given shift. In Australia and New Zealand

pro-

grams continue to be accessible. The ACCCN

registered nurse-to-patient ratio of 1 : 1 for ICU

(see

patients

Appendix B1) and the WFCCN (see Appendix A1)

and 1 : 2 for high-dependency unit (HDU) patient

have

s has

developed position statements on the provision of cri

been accepted for many years. Recently in Australia t

tical

here

care nursing education. Various support staff are

have been several projects examining the use of end

also

orsed

required to ensure the efficient functioning of the de

enrolled nurses (EEN) in the critical care setting. The

part-

New

ment, including, but not limited to, administra

South Wales project identified difficulties with

tive/

EENs

clerical staff, domestic/ward assistant staff and biom

undertaking direct patient care, but determined that

edi-

there

cal engineering staff.

may be a role for them in providing support and


assis-

STAFFING LEVELS

tance to the RN.27,30,32 Other countries, such as the US

A staff establishment refers to the number o

A,

f nurses

have lower nurse staffing levels, but in those co

required to provide safe, efficient, quality care to

untries

patients. Staffing levels are influenced by many f

nursing staff is augmented by other types of clin

actors,

ical or

including the economic, political and individual ch

support staff, such as respiratory technicians.33 The li

ar-

mi-

acteristics of the unit in question. Other factors,

tations of this staffing approach are discussed later in

this
chapter. Once the base staffing numbers per shif helpful for new units to contact a unit of similar size and
t have

service profile to ascertain their experiences.

been established, the unit manager is required to cal


cu-

NURSE-TO-PATIENT RATIOS

late the number of full-time equivalents that are requ Nurse-to-patient ratios refer to the number of nursing
ired

hours required to care for a patient with a particular set

to implement the roster. In Australia, one FTE is equal of needs. With approximately 30% of Australian and New
to

Zealand units identified as combined units incorporating

a 38-hour working week.

intensive

The development of the nursing establishment is dep patients,


en-

coronary

care

and

high-dependency

different nurse-to-patient ratios are required

for these often diverse groups of patients. It is important

dent on many variables. Historical data from pre to


vious

care,

34

note

that

nurse-to-patient

ratios

are

provided

merely as a guide to staffing levels, and implementation

years of patient throughput and patient acuity asshould depend on patient acuity, local knowledge and
sist in

expertise.

the determination of future requirements. It is Within the intensive care environment in Australia and
often

New Zealand, there are several documents that guide


nurse-to-patient ratios (Table 2.4). The ACCCN has developed and endorsed two position statements that identify
the need for a minimum nurse-to-patient ratio of 1 : 1 for
intensive care patients and 1 : 2 for high-dependency
patients.30,35 In New Zealand, the Critical Care Nurses
Section

of

the

New

Zealand

Nursing

Organisation

(NZNO)32 also determines that critically ill or ventilated


patients require a minimum 1 : 1 nurse-to-patient ratio.
Both of these nursing bodies state that this ratio is clinically determined. The WFCCN states that critically ill
patients require one registered nurse to be allocated at all
times.36 The College of Intensive Care Medicine (CICM)
also identifies the need for a minimum nurse-to-patient
ratio of 1 : 1 for intensive care patients and 1 : 2 for highdependency patients.27,37
The ACCCN30 and the NZNO Critical Care Nurses
Section32 have outlined the appropriate nurse staffing
standards in Australia and New Zealand for ICUs within
the context of accepted minimum national standards and
evidence that supports best practice. The ACCCN statement identified 10 key principles to meet the expected
standards of critical care nursing (Table 2.5).
These recommendations serve merely to guide nurse-topatient ratios, as extraneous factors such as the clinical
practice setting, patient acuity and the knowledge and
expertise of available staff will influence final staffing patterns. In particular, patient dependency scoring tools are
designed to guide these staffing decisions and are discussed below.

PATIENT DEPENDENCY
Patient dependency refers to an approach to quantify the

care needs of individual patients, so as to match these

nurses required to care for them, based on the accepted

needs to the nursing staff workload and skill mix.

nurse-to-patient ratios of 1 : 1 for ICU patients and 1 : 2

38

For

many years, patient census was the commonest method

for HDU patients. This reflects the unit-based workload,

for determining the nursing workload within an ICU.

and is also the common funding approach for ICU

That is, the number of patients dictated the number of

bed-day costs.

(021) 66485438 66485457

www.ketabpezeshki.com

TABLE 2.4 Documents that guide the nurse-to-patient ratios in critical care
Document

Recommendations

ACCCN: Position statement on

ICU patients (clinically determined) should have a 1 :1 nurse-to-patient ratio.

intensive care nurse staffing

HDU patients (clinically determined) should have a 1 :2 nurse-to-patient ratio.

ACCCN: Position statement on the

All intensive care patients must have a registered nurse (division 1) allocated exclusively to their care.

healthcare workers other than

High-dependency or step-down patients (in intensive care) who require a nurse-to-patient ratio of

30

Division 1 Registered Nurses in


Intensive Care

35

1:2 should have a registered nurse (division 1) allocated exclusively to their care.

Enrolled nurses (division 2) and unlicensed assistive personnel may be allocated roles to assist the
registered nurse, but any activities that involve direct contact with the patient must always be

NZNO, Critical Care Section:

performed in the immediate presence of the registered nurse (division 1).

Philosophy and Standards for

The critically ill and/or ventilated patient will require a minimum 1 :1 nurse-to-patient ratio.

Nursing Practice in Critical Care32

At times, patients in the critical care unit may have higher or lower nursing acuity; the critical care
nurse in charge of the shift determines any variation from the 1 :1 ratio, taking into account context,

WFCCN: Declaration of Buenos

skill mix and complexity.

Aires, Position Statement on the

Critically ill patients (clinically determined) require one registered nurse at all times.

Provision of Critical Care Nursing

High-dependency patients (clinically determined) in a critical care unit require no less than one

Workforce

nurse for two patients at all times.

36

CICM: Minimum Standards for


Intensive Care Units27

A minimum of 1 :1 nursing is required for ventilated and other similarly critically ill patients, and
nursing staff must be available to greater than 1 :1 ratio for patients requiring complex management
(e.g. ventricular assist device).

CICM: Recommendations on

The majority of nursing staff should have a post-registration qualification in intensive care or in the
specialty of the unit.

Standards for High-Dependency

All nursing staff in the unit responsible for direct patient care should be registered nurses.

Units Seeking Accreditation for

The ratio of nursing staff to patients should be 1 :2.

Training in Intensive Care

All nursing staff in the HDU responsible for direct patient care should be registered nurses, and the

Medicine

37

majority of all senior nurses should have a post-registration qualification in intensive care or

determined)

nursing. ratio of at least 1 :1.


Require ahigh-dependency
standard nurse-to-patient
A minimum of two registered nurses should be present in the unit at all times when a patient is

(clinically determined)

Require apresent.
standard nurse-to-patient ratio of at least 1 :2

ACCCN Australian College of Critical Care Nurses; NZNO New Zealand Nurses Organisation; WFCCN World Federation of Critical Care Nurses; CICM College of

leader)

There must be a designated critical-care-qualified senior nurse per shift who is supernumerary and whose

Intensive Care Medicine.

TABLE 2.5 Ten key points of intensive care nursing staffing30


Point

Description

1. ICU patients (clinically

2. High dependency patients

3. Clinical coordinator (team


primary role is responsibility for the logistical management of patients, staff, service provision and resource
utilisation during a shift.
4. ACCESS nurses

These are nurses in addition to the bedside nurses, clinical coordinator, unit manager, educators and
non-nursing support staff. They provide Assistance, Coordination, Contingency, Education, Supervision
and Support.

5. Nursing manager

At least one designated nursing manager (NUM/CNC/NPC/CNM or equivalent) who is formally recognised as
the unit nurse leader is required per ICU.

6. Clinical nurse educator

At least one designated CNE should be available in each unit. The recommended ratio is one FTE CNE for
every 50 nurses on the ICU roster.

7. Clinical nurse consultants

Provide global critical care resources, education and leadership to specific units, to hospital and area-wide
services, and to the tertiary education sector.

8. Critical care nurses

The ACCCN recommends an optimum specialty qualified critical care nurse proportion of 75%.

9. Resources

These are allocated to support nursing time and costs associated with quality assurance activities, nursing
and multidisciplinary research, and conference attendance.

10. Support staff

ICUs are provided with adequate administrative staff, ward assistants, manual handling assistance/
equipment, cleaning and other support staff to ensure that such tasks are not the responsibility of nursing
personnel.

ACCCN Australian College of Critical Care Nurses; CNC clinical nurse consultant; CNE clinical nurse educator; CNM clinical nurse manager; FTE full-time
equivalent; NPC nurse practice coordinator; NUM nursing unit manager.

(021) 66485438 66485457

www.ketabpezeshki.com

26

SCOPE OF CRITICAL CARE

as the acute physiological and chronic health evaluat


The nursing workload at the individual patient le

ion

vel,

(APACHE) and simplified acute physiology score (SAP

however, is also reflective of patient acuity, the com

S)

plexity

systems.Althoughthesescoringsystemshavevalueinde

of care required and both the physical and the

ter-

psycho-

mining the probability of in-hospital mortality, they

logical status of the patient.

38

Strict adherence to

the

are not
good predictors of nursing dependency or workload.38

patient census model leads to the inflexibility of matc

The therapeutic intervention scoring system (TISS

h-

) was

ing nursing resources to demand. For example, some

developed to determine severity of illness, to est

ICU

ablish

patients receive care that is so complex that mo

nurse-to-patient ratios and to assess current bed

re than

utilisa-

one nurse is required, and an HDU patient may requir

tion.38 This system attributes a score to each pro

cedure/

less medical care than an ICU patient, but conversely

intervention performed on a patient, with the pre

may

mise

require more than 1 : 2 nursing care level secon

that the greater the number of procedures performed

dary to

, the

such factors as physical care requirements, patient c

higher the score, the higher the severity of illne

onfu-

ss, the

sion, anxiety, pain or hallucinations.

38

A patient c

higher the intensity of nursing care required.38 Si

ensus

nce its

approach therefore does not allow for the varying nur

development in the mid-1970s, TISS has undergone

sing

mul-

hours required for individual patients over a shift

tiple revisions, but this scoring system, like APACHE a

, nor

nd

does it allow for unpredicted peaks and troughs in ac

SAPS, still captures the therapeutic requirements

tiv-

of the

ity, such as multiple admissions or multiple discharge

patient. It does not, however, capture the entirety of

s.

the

There are many varied patient dependency/classifica

nursing role. Therefore, while these scoring systems

tion

may

tools available, with their prime purpose being to clas

provide valuable information on the acuity of the pati

sify

ents

patients into groups requiring similar nursing care an

within the ICU, it must be remembered that they are

d to

not

attribute a numerical score that indicates the amount

accurate indicators of total nursing workload. Other s

of

pe-

nursing care required. Patients may also be class

cific nursing measures have been developed, but hav

ified

e not

according to the severity of their illness. These s

gained widespread clinical acceptance in Australia or

coring

New

systems are generally based on physiological variabl

Zealand. (For further discussion of nursing wo

es, such

rkload

measures, see Measures of Nursing Workload or Ac


tivity in

registered nurses possessing a formal specialist critical

this chapter.)

care qualification. The ACCCN recommends an optimum

While not strictly workload tools, various early w qualified critical care nurse to unqualified critical care
arning

nurse ratio of 75%30 (see Appendix B2). In Australia and

scoring systems are increasingly being used to f New Zealand, approximately 50% of the nurses employed
acilitate

in critical care units currently have some form of critical

the early detection of the deteriorating patient. Tcare qualification.34


hese

Debate

continues

in

an

attempt

to

determine

the

early warning systems generally take the format of a optimum skill mix required to provide safe, effective
stan-

nursing care to patients.4248 Much of the research fuelling

dardised observation chart with an in-built track this debate has been undertaken in the general ward
and

setting, and still predominantly in the USA. However, it

trigger process.3941

has provided the starting point for specialty fields of


nursing to begin to examine this issue. The use of nurses

SKILL MIX

other than registered nurses in the critical care setting has

Skill mix refers to the ratio of caregivers with va been discussed as one potential solution to the current
rying

critical care nursing shortage. Projects in Australia trial-

levels of skill, training and experience in a clinic ling the use of EENs in the critical care environment have
al unit.

largely proved inconclusive.49

In critical care, skill mix also refers to the proportion Published research on skill mix has examined the substiof

tution of one grade of staff with a lesser skilled, trained


or experienced grade of staff and has utilised adverse
events as the outcome measure. A significant proportion
of research suggests that a rich registered nurse skill mix
reduces the occurrence of adverse events.4248 A comprehensive review of hospital nurse staffing and patient outcomes noted that existing research findings with regard
to staffing levels and patient outcomes should be used to
better understand the effects of skill mix dilution, and
justify the need for greater numbers of skilled professionals at the bedside.50
While there has not been a formal examination of skill
mix in the critical care setting in Australia and New
Zealand, two publications51,52 informing this debate
emerged from the Australian Incident Monitoring Study
ICU (AIMSICU). Of note, 81% of the reported adverse
events resulted from inappropriate numbers of nursing
staff or inappropriate skill mix.51 Furthermore, nursing
care without expertise could be considered a potentially
harmful intrusion for the patient, as the rate of errors by
experienced critical care nurses was likely to rise during
periods of staffing shortages, when inexperienced nurses
required supervision and assistance.51 These important
findings provide some insight into the issues surrounding
skill mix.
In Australia and New Zealand, an annual review of intensive care resources53 reported that there were 6633.7 FTE
registered nurses currently employed in the critical care
nursing workforce (5587.2 in the public sector and

1046.5 in the private sector). More recently, in 2005,

Enrolled nurse training has not occurred in New Zealand

categories of nurses in the workforce other than registered

since 1993, and those who are currently employed in the

nurses were captured and reported for the first time,

healthcare system are restricted to a scope of practice that

showing that there were 53.9 FTE enrolled nurses cur-

does not call for complex nursing judgements. Thus, no

rently employed in the critical care setting in Australia

enrolled nurses were reported to be working in critical

(44.6 in the public sector and 9.3 in the private sector).

34

(021) 66485438 66485457

www.ketabpezeshki.com

You might also like