Professional Documents
Culture Documents
M a te ria ls an d m e th o d s
T hirty-one subjects w hose m axillary
incisors were considered esth etically
acceptable by both dentist and su b
ject, were chosen. Casts were m ade of
the m axillary arch, intraoral p hoto
graphs were taken, and periapical
radiographs w ere m ade w ith the par
allellin g techniqu e. T h is tech n iqu e
was chosen becau se in conversation
w ith G. Pappas, DDS (January 1975) I
was inform ed that w ith th is m ethod
there is no distortion of the shape of
the teeth.
From the study of the casts, the in
traoral photographs, and the rad io
graphs, three dentists classified the
form s of the faces and of the m ax il
lary central incisors. E ach dentist
was instructed in the W illiam s
m ethod of classifying tooth and face
form : a square in ciso r w as one that
was parallel m esially and d istally for
at least h a lf of the ce rv ico in cisal
length; a tapered tooth converged
from th e in cisa l edge to the cervix;
and an ovoid tooth was bicon vex (Fig
1).
T h e facial ou tline w as determ ined
by the ou tline of the tem poral bone at
the h eight of the h airlin e, tem poral
process of the zygom atic arch, and
gonion. T he square face was one in
w h ich th e ou tline of the face betw een
JADA, Vol. 97, October 1978 637
A R T IC L E S
Fig 2 Left, square face; middle, tapered face; right, ovoid face.
R e su lts
T h e data were electro n ically reduced
by com puter. T h ey were pro
gram m ed into S P S S crosstabs (the
638 JADA, Vol. 97, October 1978
Ovoid
Squ are
T apered
40.0
60.0
0.0
33.3
12.3
42.9
19.4
0.0
0.0
33.3
33.3
33.3
33.3
12.9
28.6
12.9
80.0
12.9
44.4
44.4
11.1
33.3
12.9
12 (38.7% )
28.6
12.9
14 (45.2% )
20.0
3.2
5 (16.1% )
No.
10
32.3
12
38.7
29.0
31
100.0
C hi-square = 4.98624 with 4 degrees of freedom ; sig nifican ce = 0.2887. R esu lt: no co rrelatio n.
ARTICLES
Ovoid
Square
Tapered
42.9
35.7
21.4
50.0
19.4
35.7
16.1
60.0
9.7
28.6
71.4
0.0
16.7
6.5
35.7
16.1
0.0
0.0
40.0
40.0
20.0
33.3
12.9
12 (38.7%)
28.6
12.9
14 (45.2%)
40.0
6.5
5 (16.1%)
45.2
22.6
10
32.3
Summary
31
100.0
A R T IC L E S
THE AUTHOR
BE LL
20059.