Professional Documents
Culture Documents
'.'
,.4
itl
.iil
t,rl,fli,il*w
r-i
::'
'tffi,
-,,,,'..
.
i,,',
d
,J)
a
U
p
F
.r'
F
*
t./
.rl
trl
Maska
Zlatan lim
TrebeniSte
Kraj VI veka pre n. e.
Narodni muzej, Beograd
C\
i.ti!+:,lr:,:ii:.
r,
t1l
Mask
Gold foil
TrebeniSte
F,nd of the 6th century B. C.
N a t i o n a lM u s e u m .B e l g r a d e
::::::::
::::::l:
Grcki i helenistiGkiportret
Ljubi5aB. Popovic
'u
:-
co
:r::r:::ll!ll1lll1!:l
.].:;;:i;j:.:il'il
,.,,::
.,1:t
r::.i:l
i: :ilil
,:,,:tl
:':, . : i l
!ilti
.:t::
:"r:i
tl
cn
rt
-F.
F
,(,
F
ffin'nnil*
'-)
..1
th
rFl
r-l
F-
F
r!
n
F
^
w.
,U
F
\o
,ml
"*Ynt
l14l
Glava iene
Stucco
Vis (Issa)
iII ili II vek pre n e .
A r h e o l o 5 k im u z e j , S p l i t
u4l
Head of a woman
Clay
Vis (Issa)
J r d o r 2 n d c e n t u r yB . C .
ArchaeologicalMuseum, Split
rl
c^t)
^
rfl
.-]
ir
L
F
t/.
\r'.
'U
Lr
oo
-t
l
l
c\
;:','i;
: :: ::il
...
Fl
(,t)
f f'J
r-.]
:r
F
rr I
.r'.
F
*.
w.
F
c{
ltsl
Glava mladi6a
Bronza
Novi Dojran
III vek pre n. e.
Muzeji Makedonije,Skopje
a{
l15l
Head of a youth
Bronze
Novi Dojran
3rd centurv B. C.
Museums of Macedonia,Skopje
-l
a
rF)
Fr
F
r!
F.
l.
|/.
'Q
o.l
N
Literatura
J. Babelon, Le portrait dans l'Antiquite
d'apres les monnaies, Paris 1950.
J. J. Bernoulli, Griechiscbe lkonograpbie,
Miinchen 1901.
M. Bieber. Tbe Sculptur,eof the Hellenistic Age,
N e w Y o r k 1 9 5 5a n d 1 9 6 1 .
E. Buschor, Das hellenistiscbe Bildnishunst,
Miinchqn 1949.
R. Delbrrick, Antihe Portriits, Bonn 1912.
G. Hafner, Spilthellenistische Bildnisplastik.
leryyrh einer schaftlichen Gliedirung,
Berlin 1954.
A. Hekler, Bildnishunst d.er Griechen und
Riimer, Stuttgart 19 12.
R. P. Hinks, Greeh and Roman Portrait
Sculpture, London 1,935 and 1976.
L. Laurenzi, Rittrati greci, Firenze 1947.
E. Pfuhl, Die An[Anpe priecbischer
Bildnishunst, MiincFen t922.
V. Poufsen, Les portraits grecs, Copenhague
1954.
G. Y. A. Richter, Handbooh of Greek Art,
London and New York 1969.
<-a-a-,
Portraits oftbe Greehs,3 vols, London 1971.
C. Seltman, Greek Coins, Oxford 1955.
|t)
:l
p
F
F
,(.)
tr
rat
C{
qa
r1
--t
F
rrl
F
',,r'
,U
F
Y
N
F6l
Greekand HellenisticPortraiture
Ljubi5aB. Popovic
t lT l
Ie]
120l
F6l
=
.Ja
)
_
=
It7)
[1e]
[20]
rn
o.l
T H e p o n t R R I T a s a n a r t f o r m i m p l i e sa n a u t h e n t i cu n d e r s t a n d i n qo f t h e
individual as a un.iquehuman being. The first stimuli for the m""ki.,gof
portraits among the Greeks did noi spring from religiousmorives,a-sin Egypt,
but trom the admiration for the human values,i.e. for physical and intelleiiual
prowess. The first achievementsin this-respecrdate from ihe archaic period. It
was then that the inherited tradition of the Egyptian frontality and rigid figures
was gradually abandoned. The human body iai represented*ith gr"iter Jkill,
its anatomy b.ecameb-errerknown, and there appeaied the first hinis of free
movement. The art of. Egypt and Mesopotamii demanded that the rype, not
the individual should beiepresented.
]^he.Greek archaic art did not'jrodrrce
genuine.portraits..
It represintedmerely the rypical, generalforms of man, and
t h e . p a r t l c u l a n s a t l owna s l r m l t e dt o t h e m o s t c o n s p i c u o u se x t e r n a fl e a t u r e s ,
such as the coiffure and the beard. The only diffeience between deities ancl
men was that men had shorter hair. on the other hand, the sraruesof girls
from the mature archaicperiod, those rigid figures with the typical orjoic
smile, h.aveinscriptionsindicating which-godd-ess
they *.r. d.ii.rted to. In
short, the representarions
of figures_inthis period, as seenin kouroi and korae,
d r d , n o t g o b e y o n d t h e _ m a r k i n go f t h e m o s t g e n e r a lf e a t u r e sT. o w a r d s t h e e n d
ol the archaicperiod the Greek arristsmasteiedthe anaromy of the human
b o d y a n d a l s o b e g a nt o a p p l y n e w i d e a si n p o r t r a i t u r e .
The Greek art-of the 5th century did noi achievegenuineportraits. The
world view of the people,of that epoch.was characteiizedby a ronging for
beauty and harmony, ald rhey instinctively rejectedelemenisthrea*tenlng
to
dlsrupt the concept of the typical. During the persian\wars artistsdid n6t seek
to reveal and preserveparticular forms: this is best seenin the portraits of
bearded st.rategi,whose helmets show that they are intrepid wjrriors, but
whose only personalfeatureis the twisted mouth.
Some intimation of the individualizedportrait may be noticed on the statue
of
,Aristogeitones,which was placed in the Athenian igor^ in 477/76 B. C., and
w h r c h l s k n o w n t o u s t h r o u g h s e v e r aR
l o m a n c o p i e s .T h e p o r t r a i t o f
ThemistoclesG.
B.C.),
{rom
the
,..orrd quarrer of th. Sth cenrury
2??-46?
B. C., is very striking, in spite of the traces of archaic influence in the
treatment of the face.The increasingiyfr-equenrartemprsar realism,borh in
sculpture and in painting (on the vaies of the time) ole.e, ho*euer, ousred our
q/.th^enew tendencytowards idealization,introduced by phydias (c. 490 B.
C.), Polycletzs(the latter half of the 5th century B. C.),'and other
contemporary a-rtists.In spite of rhat, the interest in the presentationof
characterand of particular traits is evident in the portraits of Anacreon (572487 B. C.), Mihiades (c. 550-488
B.c.) and Peri.cles
(c.495420 B.c.), as well as in the earliestexamplesof
cameosand coins - e. g. in.the representarions
of Tissaphernes
(end if ,h" sth
a n d r h e b e g i n n i n go f t 6 e 4 t h . . n t u r y B . c . ) a n d p h a r a h b a z u s( i l 3 _ 3 t o B . c . ) .
I heseportraits combine the typical and the individual in a way which gives
them a specialcharm.
The pbrtraits dating from the 4rh century B. C. onwards are more
individualized.This is particularly seenin rhe portraits of Herodotus (4g4430
l. Cr) and Thucidides (c. 460400 B. C.), the two greatesthistorians of the
ciassicalworld, of Lysias (c.455-380 B.'c.), the fairous orator, and in the
portraits of the two great philosophers,Plato (c.429-347 B. c.) and socrates
(469-.399B. c.)..The aurhor of the original portraits of thesetwo philosophers
may have been the celebratedsculptorZysippus. Litercry sources t.ll .rr th"t
J
QN
rFl
r-l
r-l
F
F
\r'
'(,
F
the statesmanand orator Lycurgus (end of the 4th century B. C.) placed, on
t h e o c c a s i o no f t h e 1 i O t h O l y m p i c G a m e s( c . 3 4 0 - 3 3 0 B . C . ) t h e b r o n z e
statuesoI AescbyLus
(525/24456 B. C.), Sophocles(496406 B. C.) and
Ewripides (c. 480-405 B. C.) in the Athenian theatre. All three portraits have
been identified by means of Roman copies from Lateran and Naples.
The most common form in which the human figure was representedin
Greek art was the statue - the portrait, i.e. the entire human figure with all the
traits of its individualitv. The inscriotionsthat have been oreseivedon simole
low postamentsindicate that the statueswere kept, especiilly in Hellenistic
times, in places used for various public activities. There also appearedthe
tendency, at a comparatively early date, to represent the head separatelyin a
new form - the so-called herm. Originally it representedgod Hermes, but
later, as the herm becamedissociatedfrom its religious purpose, it became
simply the representation of a man. Herms were commonly placed as a
decorativeelementon simple pillars. They were usually pliced in halls-herms,
near the pool. In the frescoesfrom Pompeii (the house of Marcws Lucretiws
Frontus),'hermsare decorativeelementsbf the landscape.The well-known and
import4nt herms found at lVelschbillig (now in the museum of Trieres) were
part of the decoration of a Roman villa. Finallv. the last form of the oortrait at
i h e b e g i n n i n go f t h e H e l l e n i cp e r i o d w a s r h e b u s t . [ t c a m e i n r o b e i n g a s a
result of practical considerations.By shortening the frequently awkward form
of the herm, a tectonic form was obtained which proved more suitable and
continued to be used. Hellenistic artists never returned to the naturalistic
representation
of the human body as the Romans did.
'If
we view Greek portraiture in the context of the other achievementsof
Greek art, we shall notice that at the end of the 5th century B. C. it tended to
move from the typical to the particular and personal. The artists strove not
only to master and perfect the natural forms. but also to exDressa completelv
,r.- ,.r-rr. of the irregular, the transient and the ugly. They^particularly rongtt
to differentiate physiognomies and expressions,and to reveal individual
psychologicaltraits. In other words, the idealsof harmonious beauty and
measurewere no longer considered as pre-eminent - the main aim of the
s c u l p t o rw a s t o t e p r e i " n t i n h i s f i g u r e st h e a c t i v i t y o f t h e s o u l , w h i c h w a s a l s o
the aestheticideal advocatedby Socrdtes.
The ideas o{ Isocrates(436-338 B. C.) concerning the great empire were
implemented partly by Philip II of Macedonia (359-336 B. C.) and completely
by his successorAlexander the Great (336-323B C.). The extensiveconquests
of Alexander and contacts with other peoples, cultures and civilizations
resulted in mutual influences and cross-fertilization unknown up to that time.
This phenomenonhas been called Hellenism in the history of art. It primarily
-""ni the diffusion of Greek art outside the Greek islands and mainland, and
its founder was Aristoteles'sdisciple Alexander the Great. His appearanceon
the historical scenemarks the befinning of the Hellenistic period. The great
sculptor Lysippus was also active in Alexander's lifetime. The concept.of
Hellenism, differing from Hellenic implies a new spirit which altered the
ourlook of Greek artists. It particularlv stimulated the development of realistic
sculpture. The world beleniites inrte"d of bel6n appearsfor th" first time in the
Bible,Jews; adopted the Greek languageand Gree-kcivilization as a contrast to
their own civilization and the Hebraic language.
The knowledge of foreign countries, cultures and languagesbroadened the
horizons of the Greeks of ihe Hellenistic period. Scholarshipand philosophy
began to flourish. In art, the study of other peoples led to the representation of
their particular traits. We know that the Greeks of the classicalperiod regarded
all other peoplesas barbarians.Hellenistic art representedthe Gauls, Negroes,
Italics and others with sympathy and understanding. Slaves,fishermen,
shepherdsand peasants-ak. theit first appeara.""l.t Greek art in the
Hellenistic period. They are shown with i surprising naturalism,which makes
Hellenistic irt clearly distinct from the idealismof the classicalperiod. The
'tJ
---1
---)
L
'<
=
=,
:Z
f'-
c\
J
tt)
rt
-)
F
Trl
F
a/.
\y'.
,(,
F
oo
(-.1
portraits on coins over a period of two hundred years.The first portraits that
The most
ippeared were those of Alexander the Great and his successors.
biiutifui examplesof Greek coin portraiture include representationsof
Pbiletaerusof Pergamum (c. 3$-263 B. C.), Antiochus I Soter,king of Syria
(324-261B. C.), King Perseusof Macedonia(213-162B. C.), Eutbyde.musI
(222-187B.C.), Antimachus 1of Bactria (190-180 B. C.) and Mithridates III
of Pontus. These coins may be said to representthe highest achievementsin
t h e r e a l i s t i cr e p r e s e n t a t ; o n ' ot hf e h u m a n T i g u . . .
Although the Roman conquestof Greeci was completedin 146 B. C.,
Athens and a few other Greek cities were grantedpermissionto coin their own
money. The coinagein Greecefinally ceasedwith the establishmentof the
Roman Empire inJo g. C. But the tradition of the Hellenistic times lived
long, as is ihown by the golden stater with Alexander'sname, which was
adopted by Macedoniankings and was still current in the Roman period. Thus,
the i{oman consul Flaminiuiused, in 197 B. C., Alexander'sstater upon which
he impressedhis own name and portrait.
The numerous Greek artists who worked in Italy gradually feli under the
influenceof late Etruscanportraiture. Another equally important influencewas
the practice of the making of waxen death-masks.This custom is often
menlioned as the factor which contributed most to the realisticcharacterof
Republicanportraiture. We must remember,however, that the Hellenistic
conceptionwas dominant in the entire territory of Italy, including Etruria, in
the time of the Roman Republic. One should be only reminded of the portraits
of local Etruscanmasrers.which are quite distinct from Greek portraits. These
p o r t r a i t sl o s t t h e i r i m p o r t a n c ea l r e a d y ' i nt h e l s t c e n t u r y B . C . a n d t h e y d i d
not influencethe late Republicanportraiture to any significantdegree.
Until the end of the 2nd century and the beginning of the 1st century B. C.
many Greek sculptorswho were in the serviceof Rome merely copied Greek
sculptures,especiilly portraits of eminent men. Among them, Pasitelesand
Arcisilaus, who lived ln the 1st century B. C., were especiallywell known, as
Pliniws (GaiwsPLiniusSecundus,23/24*79 B C.) tells us. It is thanks to the
activity of theseartiststhat many important works of Greek portraiture have
been rescuedfrom oblivion in copieswhich are frequently little inferior to the
originals.
The later brilliant portraits on Roman coins were certainly inspired by
Greek.modeisand representa separatechapter in the history of Roman
Portralture.
, e may mention
T u r n i n g t o t h e p o r t r a i t sf o u n d i n t h e t e r r i t o r y o [ Y u g o s l a v i aw
first thJ -"sk oT gold foil from TrebeniSte.Ii is undJubtediy the work of a
native maste.
was made from an impression from the face of an Illyrian
"nd-it
orince. with the
aim to immortalize the deceased.The mask was found in a
well-known cemetery and it is schematizedand treated in a rather superficial
way. The eyesand eyebrows are not typical, the lips are thin and tigfit, and the
beard is representedwith dot-lika protrusions. The face is characterizedby a
marked naturalism.In spite of some deficiencies,the characterizationof the
face is unique as regards its artistic quality not only in Yugoslavia, but aiso in
Europe. The only, thoLrghpurely formal analogy can be found in the
chronologicallydistant masksfrom Mycenae.The custom of covering parts of
the human body in this way was alien to the Myceneans)so that it is not
improbable that here we have a caseof Egyptian influence reaching
Peloponesusvia Crete. In spite of the fact that many problems in connection
with the appearanceof golden masks at TrebeniSteare still unsolved, it may be
said that influences from the easternMediterranean were of primary
importance in this respect and that they contributed directly to the diffusion of
Egyptian models. The'mask from Trebeni5teis a precursor'of some later
poitraits found in Yugoslavia,such as the one shown here (cat..1),which dates
lrom 520 B. C. Among the rich finds from Novi Pazar especiallynoteworthy
-7
in a similar
headscul.ptured
ili. rn"ie is also.a
:;';i"fi.';;,;;,,;;i.L.'ii,
b e a r da n d h a i r .
s t v l e i n l i m e s r o n et . . , . - i o . t . l r i s a m a l e p o r t r a i t w i t h a r h i c k
-.ry.
which
head,
*orrh mentioning is a'female
T.pj:::l,rr.
1,";,h;.;";irri,
p i " b + y q a r 1o t . a
d e c e a s e pd e r s o nt . r , . i j i . n t o t h " r " t " . . " - . o t t a . w h i c h Y i :
and with ivy in
fairly large Statuette,rePresentsa Person wrth a rich coiffure
t'-^i-i-r"
h e h a i r ( c a t .1 4 ) .
the thick hair
-"f. po.i."it, have some features in common, such as
modelled on the finds
are
portraits
These
L;;tJ.
,"J*..i.rtty'represent;;
i".""9. a"d th'r" are.alsosome points of
'Ihe
i,rty lsi.itf
f;;;;;;;h
".,d
-rlks from the 4th and 3rd ie.ttrry B.C'
resemblancewith the ifr"""iJ
or-the
Vis -"U U" dated into the second half of the 3rd century
.,.,.,."1r, from',rr.l"i-j."*.y
headwith theindistinctface
e.c. Thelimestone
#ffiil';f
in vis' is
collection
Doimi
the
lrom
;;e';;;;i";'i"* .u"t r."r-piioto-iot,
archaic
o
f
o
n
e
r
e
m
i
n
d
s
s
m
i
l
e
f
o
r
c
e
d
l
t
s
s
t
y
l
e
'
;;,1;;r;.i
;.;;,;;i;;
ao*" on borhsidesandis markedby oblique,
Trr. r-'r,,.]"tir
,;Hil;.
archarc
i,-ilr b;;. .,ra.iorrslyinterpreted as.a.p rovincial version,ot
i;;iii;;;"
l
i
k
e
l
y . t h a ti t i s
m
o
s
t
s
e
e
m
s
l
t
m
o
d
e
l
i
.
E
t
r
u
s
c
a
n
o
f
i
m
i
t
a
t
i
o
n
s c u l p t u r e so r a s a n
with
dated
howe-v-er'
which cannot be'
E;';'.;;;.;',.''.,'..,
;;;;;';i
1968' 1O;M' Nikolanci' WHAD'
orecision(B. Gabri6ev:rt',-W';hiipomenici'
1976,102).
LxvItt,
"-
."Jf;.#ii'.
hi;.;iJi;;..r,
iF. prp-;;;n,"ciit;"i|';kijBii,
J
(r)
rF)
'-)
r-
F
rrl
F
,U
F
O
cq
v, c..',". zabalkanoloika
1.967.
""t" 123). the Illyrian starewas ruledby Monounios;
who had the
isa,s.c.
(Durazzo),
Dyrrhacion
from
is found on-a'coin
,,U1"*, -f ki.,g. fii.
is alsothe
""-.
There
(Dra6).
"
Epidamnws
.f
p.rt
which implies,h., n. iro*h"iiifr.
fr.omthe
Thrace)
and
Macedonia
i'.,
common
(a
very
rype
fi;J;i;'i;;."a.".frthe
to
turned
head
a
shows
.nib;"ao.nis. The obverse
timeof Alexander
with
Zeus
enthroned
represents
reverse
.i*iri *li[-, ii."-rt-, a"d 1!e
BASILEOSMONOYNIOY'
to th"''l"li.i t l* the insc'ription
tellsus that
""J,
Augustus'
",?.it",.,
Emperor
of
*ho-*-tt in the time
TroPus,
Pomoeius
agalnst
war
waged
Ptole.my.'
son
I
ysimachus's
Moiounios,tJg.the.with
in taking
ptolemyKeraunos,PhilrdJph"r's son,and that the'latter"succeeded
Illyrian
the
as
Monownlos
that
It is very probable
over the Macedonianthror-re'.
a
proof
As
Great.
the
Alexander
of
ruler was one of ,fr. -liii"iy
"o-*"rid.r,helmet1n9wil,Ferlin) which features
,..",io"-r-"'o.,-Illyri".r
may
of this we
and with the caps
;a.",ii"i'*iif-,ift"rl worn.byGreeksoldiers
Ff-.'.u*i""-.rp.
un iosis
in'
constantinople.
sarcophagus
ru."r.a.r;,
.Mono
;;i.:;;;J:;
;#;*;i;
;; ;;;;;'*
nose
,t'. io.''i of"afairtv.vou,ng
f'1,*i'1,'Jooked
Ht""lti
:
2
-/
stateoccupied the areanorth of the Drim river and LjeS and included the tribal
communities round Lake Skadarand the Bay of Risan. In the Third
MacedonianWar, waged berweenthe Romans and King Persews,Genthios
sided with Perseus.G"enthios'scapital was in Skadar (Siodra). He was a learned
man who favoured Greek culture and civilization. His mother was a Greek and
her name was Ewridice.During his rule the relationsof Illvria with Rome
becamestrainedbecauseof thJ piratical raids of the Illyrians on rhe Adriatic.
Genthios did not even deign to-receivea Roman mission headedby Lucius
Duronius, a Roman praetor, for he himself frequently organized piratical
incursions.Soon after that event a mission from Issa came ro complain of
Genthios's friendly relations with King Persews.As a skilful diplomat and
statesman,he sent, during the Third MacedonianWar, 54 ships to Dra6
(Epydamnos) to help the Romans, and awaited rhe outcome of the battle.
Persewsobtained victory, and sent his emissariesto Gentbios,asking him to
side with the Macedonians.By tacticaldevicesand diplomatic maneouvres
G e n t h i o sp l a y e d f o r t i m e , h o p i n g t o o b t a i n m a r e r i a ls u p p o r r .A s h e d i d n o r g e r
i t , h e w e n l t o L y e S( L y s s o s )-,h e i e h e b e g a na n o p . n . o n f l ; . t w i t h r h e R o m a " n s .
He was defe_ated,
fighting againstg..rt o?dr, by Lucius Annicius and captured,
together with his biothei C-aravaitiws,his sons and his wife, at Medun
(Meteo-n).The year 168 B.C. is taken to mark the end of the Illyrian kingdom.
According to Titus Liviws (59 B.C.-17 A.D.), the Romans achieveda
triumphant victory. LuciwsAnniciwsis said to have taken 19 loads of silver,
13.000denarsand 120.OOO
Illyrian silver coins. This Roman consul was also
the first to divide Illyricum into three parts.
Gentbios'scoins were struck in Scoira anC Lyssosand their characteristic
detail is the representation of a cap (petasosor cawsia)on rhe head of the ruler.
It is interestin[ ihat this form of iap also appearson.situlas from Va6e and
Smarjeta,and on-some finds fromJapod in Lika. This shows that the cap was
not a privilege of the illyrian ruler, as shown on rhe coins of Gentbios,6ut a
part of the costume or a sign of rank. Ve find it also on heroized native
figures, which were identified with Greek deities (D. Rendi6-Miodevi6.,
Godiinjak nauinog drwitaa BIH III, Centar zabalk. ispitivanja,1,,1,965,77.;
Istt, Vjesnik AMZ, 3, VI-VII, 1972-1973,253,7.I-VIII.; Isti, Numizmatiibe
o i j e s t iH N D , X X , 3 1 , 1 . 9 7 3 , 9 T
. . I-II).
After Genthlos'sfall, the Illyrian regionswere ruled by Balaios,of whose
appearancewe may qet some idea from his coins. The hoard of coins from
Mitkovii (Narona') ind individual finds from various other placeson the
Adriatic coast tesrify to a flourishing economy in these parts' in the 2nd
century B.C. The coins were struck in Risan and Hvar. An examplefound at
Tlogjr \c4. 27) shows Balaios with a hooked nose, stylized beard and the hair
which falls down. \7e know little of Balaios's personality. Many authors agree
that he reigned after Genthios,i.e. between 167 and 135 B.C. He lived forsome time in Skadar, and his capital was Risan (Rhizon). Pharos, with which
he came into conflict in the middle of the 2nd centurv b.C.. *.i also under
his rule.
The bronze coins from the hoard at vrbanj on the island of Hvar show a
figure very similar to that of Balaios. It is an almost identical male head as that
on Balaios'ssilver coins. The treatmentis the same,but rhe reDresenrarion
on
the bronze coins is somewhatrigid, probably becauseof the inferior skill of
the craftsmanwho cut the_die(D.-Rendi6-Miodevi6,Arch. Iug., MCMLXIV,
83, T. i-II.; I. Marovi6, God.iinjahANUBIH, XIII, Centar iabalk.
ispitivanja, 1L, 1976,231, T, IV-VII).
. Finally, we should menrion a coin with human figure, found at oianovici,
which was probably the main serrlemenrof the tribe"of ihe Daorsae.The
Iig,ureis thought ro represenrthe portrait of a particular person, perhapsof the
ribal praepositusin rhi period betweenthe reigns of Geithios aid Bakios. rr is
interesting that this figure, too, wears the 'cap (petasotor cawsia)menrioned
above. The coin of the Daorsae was struck soon after the fall oi the Illvrian
F]
(t)
rl
'.
:)
F
rrl
F.
v.
'(,
F
o.l
ca
.:,,::::.:::r::::::::::::l::ll::l::::l::::::::l
.:::::l:::::::::::::::::l::::::::::::::::.::::
.!::.i!:jii!:.ii:.i!:.j:!:::l:iil::!iiiiliil::
:::::::,:::::=::::::::::::::l:::::::::::::::::
:::::::::::::::::=::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
.:,::::,:::::=:::=:::,:,::::::::::::::::::::::
::::::::::::::::.::::::::::.].::.::::=:...::::
.:,,.,,,.::,,.::,.:,,.:,1=,,:.::,,,::.::,:,:::
.::::::::::::::::.:::::::.::::::::::::::::::::
::,,::,,::,,:.,:,1.:::.,::,:::,:::=::,:::.:
_
't-
.-
-4
Gr5ki in helenisti6niportret
Ljubi5aB. Popovic
F.l
(t)
(,
i-t
F
F
rr'.
,(,)
F
.<r
co
./
r,
F.l
(r)
-)
rt
r-.)
F
F
n
\i.
'(-)
F
c-)
'_
:
-/
r::1
t::il!l
r::t
noprper
l-pvxu n xeneHltcTl4qKn
Iby6rua 5. flonoauK
F-
F]
ct)
rFl
Fr
F-
'r
F
n.
F
w.
,(,
IJ
@
tt1
J
(t)
rl
.-..)
._)
F
rr I
*.
F
.r'.
\r'.
,(,
F
Apyra r{cro raKa :uavajua Jrr4rrHocre lenque, 180-168 r. r.H.e. Toj e cr.tr
ua fheypar, roj 6lrn Ha r{eJroHa Ap)KaBaraBo BpeMeHa BTopara r,rrperara
MaKeAoHcKanojna uefy Puujaunre r.rKpaJror llepcej . Cnafan BO rpyrara Ha
MHory o6pa:onanu nyfe na cBoero BpeMeu 6ul narloHer KoH rprrKara
KyJrrypa, HeroBara xeua 6ula fpruHra rr ce Br4KaJra
Eypr.rguxa.Bo
HepaMHonpanHa6op6a co Plrujauure ruro ja npegnogen Jlyqne Anuque,
lenque, 3aeAHoco HeroBr4or6par Kapanasrne 6ute 3apo6eHr4no Megyua
(Meteon). Moserure co Jrr4KorHa lenque ce KoBaHrrao Cragap (Scodra) u
eo Jbeur (llssos), a oBI4eMoHerI{ ce KapaKTeprrcrr{r{Hrr
rro Kanara Ha rJraBara
(petasosunn kausija). Onoj o6;rur Ha Kara ro cpe(anave w:aa crryrrr{Teol
Ba.ra u Illuapjer, KaKo r{ na janoqcxure HaoAr{eo IIr4Ka. BepojarHo roa
6uro ger oq Hocujara KaKo 3HaKHa AocrouHcrBo r{ He 6uno nonp:ano co'
r4cKryqurerHara rrpr,rBr,rn
erraj a Ha Br aAeaqor.
flo fenque, nog cyBepeHr.rrerHa Prau elageen Banej (Ballaios) 3a Koro He
ce 3Haee_
MHory, Ho HeroBoro BJraAeerLe
rpe6a Aa ce cMecrr.rBo rreprroAor
uefy 167-135 roguua rpeA H.e. Herona rpecroJrHr,rHa6uta pucau iRhizon), a
rroA HeroBa n;racr 6un u Qapoc (Pharos) co Kora ce cyApr.rJr
KoH cpeAr4Hara
Ha BTopHor BeK [peA u.e. flpurrlepoKor oA MoHerr4Teua Ealeu rrrro e
nponajgeHno Tporup (rar.27 ,28) e nur co HarnaceHoprroBcKr4
soc. tr4crorara
6pou:enra MoHerr4co Jrr,rKorna Ea;rej ce nponajgeHvrvHa Xnap r,rno Bp6ar+,.
Ha rronerure Ha rrJreMero[aopclr (Daorsoi) r4cro raKo ce nojanyna rana
(petasosulu kausija) KaKo rl Ha MoHerr4rena feuque. Oeue MoHerrr ce
KoBaHr4no [ponacra Ha rrJrr{pcKaraAp>t<aBa
no 168 roA. rrpeA H.e., a
qeHTapor 6Iar eo Oruanonra(u ro Bocua, KaAe rxro ce npoHajgeHr4oBlre
Ir^oHeTl.llorpaj oeoj npur'aepoKBo HeKporoJrara so locruJb no rpo6oalrre
79 u 90 ce nponajgeHr.ryrxre ABe HAeHTurrHr4
MoHerr,r.
Xenenucru.rKara KyJrrypa 14yMerHocr e [pr4cyrHa Ha rJloro Ha
Jyrocnaauja a oco6eno Ha rroprperr,rre oA paHr{or pr.rMcKH
nep}roA (I ra II nex
H. e.). Bo,flallaaquja n Maregouuia rvroxcar
Aa ce Booqar ceKora[r
3acrarreHrrre crurrcKtr oco6enocru Ha xeJrrrHr,rcrur{KorocQa(ame ua
yMe'THOCTa.
i:i;,.,
llllti
*.1
V)
rh
)
p
F
F
,(,
F
C-l