Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Calibration/Validation Periods
Flow
Time
Setup
Calibration
Validation
Model Configuration
F
Subwatersheds
location, physical characteristics/soils, gaging station
locations, topographic features, management questions.
Reaches
topographic features, stream morphology, cross-section
data available
Calibration Issues:
individual land use parameter determination
location of gaging station data
location of water quality monitoring information
available information on stream systems
Model Configuration
Calibration Points Example
Calibration/Validation
Procedures
F
F
F
Calibration sequence
annual water balance
seasonal variability
storm variability
time series plot
u frequency duration curve
u
baseflow
overall time series
Calibration/Validation
Statistics
Mean and standard deviation of the
simulated and measured data
Slope, intercept and regression
coefficient/coefficient of determination
Nash-Suttcliffe Efficiency
Calibration/Validation
Common Problems
F
F
F
F
F
F
Calibration/Validation
Suggested References
F
Neitsch, S. L., J. G. Arnold, J. R. Kiniry and J. R. Willams. 2001. Soil and Water
Assessment
Tool
Manual,
USDA-ARS
Publications.
pp:
341-354.
http://www.brc.tamus.edu/swat/manual.
Hydrology Calibration
Summary
F
Key considerations
Water balance
overall amount
u distribution among hydrologic components
u
Storm sequence
u
shape of hydrograph
peak
recession
consider antecedent conditions
Simulated
350
250
200
150
100
50
Time
1996
1994
1992
1990
1988
1986
1984
1982
1980
1978
1976
1974
1972
1970
1968
1966
1964
0
1962
300
Hydrologic Calibration
Scenario 1
Flow (cfs)
Simulated
Observed
Time (hours)
Hydrologic Calibration
Model failed to simulate some peak
flows
F
F
Simulated
Observed
Flow (cfs)
Time (hours)
Solutions
F
Hydrologic Calibration
Scenario 2
Flow (cfs)
Simulated
Observed
Time (hours)
Hydrologic Calibration
Model consistently over predicts the
flow
High Surface flow
Simulated
Observed
Flow (cfs)
Solutions
F
Time (hours)
Hydrologic Calibration
Model consistently over predicts the
flow
F
Solutions
F
Simulated
Observed
Flow (cfs)
Time (hours)
Hydrologic Calibration
Scenario 3
Flow (cfs)
Simulated
Observed
Time (hours)
Hydrologic Calibration
Simulated flow follows the observed pattern
but lags the actual flow consistently
F
F
F
F
Simulated
Observed
Flow (cfs)
Time (hours)
Hydrologic Calibration
Scenario 4
Flow (cfs)
Simulated
Observed
Time (hours)
Hydrologic Calibration
Simulated flow over predicts peak flows but
under predicts all other times
Solutions
F
F
F
Flow (cfs)
Simulated
Observed
Time (hours)
Key considerations
Sources of sediment loadings
Loadings from HRUs/Subbasins
u Channel degradation/deposition
Sediment Calibration
Scenario 1
Sediment
0.60
Observed
Sediment tons/ha
0.50
Simulated
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
1
Time in Months
Sediment Calibration
Model consistently under predicts the
sediment
Sediment
0.60
Observed
Sediment tons/ha
0.50
Simulated
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
Solutions
F
0.00
1
Time in Months
Sediment Calibration
Model consistently under predicts the
sediment
Sediment
0.60
Observed
Simulated
0.50
Sediment tons/ha
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
1
Time in Months
Solutions
F
Sediment Calibration
Model consistently under predicts the
sediment
F
F
F
F
Sediment Calibration
Scenario 2
Sediment
0.60
Observed
Sediment tons/ha
0.50
Simulated
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
1
Time in Months
Sediment Calibration
Model consistently over predicts the
sediment
Sediment
0.60
Observed
Solutions
Sediment tons/ha
0.50
Simulated
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
1
Time in Months
Sediment Calibration
Model consistently over predicts the
sediment
Sediment
0.60
Sediment tons/ha
Observed
0.50
Simulated
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
1
Solutions
F
Time in Months
Key considerations
Sources of nutrient loadings
Loadings from HRUs/Subbasins
u In-stream processes
Org N kg/ha
2.00
1.50
1.00
0.50
57
53
49
45
41
37
33
29
25
21
17
13
0.00
Months(93-97)
Mineral N
Min N kg/ha
0.60
0.40
0.20
57
53
49
45
41
37
33
29
25
21
17
13
0.00
Months(93-97)
Mineral N kg/ha
0.50
Simulated
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
1
Time in Months
0.60
Observed
Solutions
Mineral N kg/ha
0.50
Simulated
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
1
Time in Months
Mineral N kg/ha
0.50
Simulated
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
1
Time in Months
Mineral Nitrogen
0.60
Observed
Simulated
Mineral N kg/ha
0.50
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
Solutions
F
0.00
1
Time in Months
Organic N kg/ha
0.50
Simulated
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
1
Time in Months
Organic Nitrogen
0.60
Observed
0.50
Organic N kg/ha
Simulated
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
Solutions
F
0.00
1
Time in Months
Organic N kg/ha
0.50
Simulated
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
1
Time in Months
Organic Nitrogen
0.60
Solutions
Organic N kg/ha
Observed
0.50
Simulated
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
1
Time in Months
Soluble P kg/ha
0.50
Simulated
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
1
Time in Months
Soluble Phosphorus
0.60
Observed
Solutions
Soluble P kg/ha
0.50
Simulated
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
Time in Months
Soluble Phosphorus
0.60
Observed
0.50
Soluble P kg/ha
Simulated
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
1
Time in Months
Solutions
F
Simulated
Sol P kg/ha
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
1
Time in Months
Soluble Phosphorus
0.60
Observed
0.50
Sol P kg/ha
Simulated
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
1
Time in Months
0.60
Observed
0.50
Simulated
0.40
Sol P kg/ha
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
1
Time in Months
Solutions
F
Organic P kg/ha
0.50
Simulated
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
1
Time in Months
Organic Phosphorus
0.60
Observed
0.50
Organic P kg/ha
Simulated
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
Solutions
F
0.00
1
Time in Months
Organic P kg/ha
0.50
Simulated
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
1
Time in Months
Organic Phosphorus
0.60
Organic P kg/ha
Observed
0.50
Simulated
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.00
Solutions
F
Time in Months
Calibration/Validation
Suggestion
F