Sai Prasad (19556976)

Summary:
The main aim of this project is to comprehend the ideas of geometric
dimensioning and resilience according to ASME Y14.5-2009. An antiquity is
assessed under faro arm and lay out gages to discover whether the given part is
qualified or not for different geometric attributes according to given drawings .We
will grill the relic utilizing gear, for example, a Faro Arm and different format
gages, for example, a sine plate, marker stand with dial pointer, V square and gage
pieces. The progressions beneath will exhibit the strides taken to assess the part
utilizing the different hardware, trailed by our decision.
Below table shows the all the readings that are gather and evaluated during
the process of testing given work part.

Faro Arm
Introduction
The Faro Arm, a convenient six hub direction measuring machine (CMM) is
a jointed gadget that mimics the human arm's development and permits makers
simple confirmation of item quality by performing 3D assessments, apparatus
affirmations, CAD correlation, dimensional examination, figuring out, and for
anyplace else a high-precision, hard-testing estimation arrangement is required.
This arm makes measuring complex questions simple with precision up to 13
microns. It is utilized to assess the planned items for confirmation of nature of
items. The FARO Arm can make precise estimations of the basic measurements of
a section. A faro arm encoder window will be opened at first when we begin the
Faro Arm it demonstrates red bolt bearings. In light of the course appeared in the
window the faro arm should be moved. To figure the position of the test these
encoder should be finished. So the faro arm acts like a human arm.

Work Piece

Among three work White colored work piece is selected

Calibration
Calibration of the faro arm is done before starting the inspection process.
This is done by the following steps.
Select > Devices
Select > Probes
In the current probe drop down menu, make sure that an appropriate option
is selected.
It is 6mm ball probe in our project.
Select Hole calibration and follow the on screen instructions.
After a green light indicating the completion of calibration appears, click OK.

Scanning the part

Before scanning the work piece following steps to be taken for accurate
results.
Place the part on the flat plate.
Since the part has a datum A, which is the bottom surface. It is raised to a
height by using a gages block and fixed using clamps. Hence the bottom
surface is easily scanned and inspected for its flatness.
Using the Plane" option under the Measure tab, the operator has to take a
minimum of 3 points to simulate the plane in the workbench.
Taking more number of points (say 15 to 20) will result in more accurate
results.
Using the same approach, the operator has to simulate all the flat features.
Using Cylinder option from the Measure tab allows the operator to
simulate cylindrical surfaces.
The operator has to name the simulated features by right clicking on each
individual feature and select Assign Datum option and this name/datum
assignment is done as required.
Units
The FARO Cam 2 estimation programming has its default estimation as
millimeters. The client can change the units by tapping on "resistance Preference"
under the "Home" tab. In this undertaking, the units are changed to Inches.

Measurement
Now the given part is inspected for various geometric characteristics as per
the drawings given. First of all select plane and start scanning the primary plane.

Assign Datum A
Right click on Plane 1(Datum A)
Select Edit GD&T option
In the GD&T dialogue box, set the upper tolerance for parallelism to 0.007
in.
Close

Above picture1 shows the inspected flatness value of the datum A of the part can
be seen in the feature control dialogue box.
The above picture 2 shows that the flatness is less than the desired value and thus
the feature pass.

Upper plane
Right click on Plane
Select Edit GD&T option
In the GD&T dialogue box, set the upper tolerance for parallelism to 0.007
in. The parallelism with respect to Datum A can be set by selecting the
datum from the drop down menu to the right side of the parallelism edit box.
Set the parallelism to 0.007 in
Close

Click on the Feature Information to check the feature properties.

The above picture shows that the parallelism is more than the desired value and
thus the feature is a fail.
Assign Datum B
Right click on Plane

 Select Edit GD&T option

In the GD&T dialogue box, set the tolerance for perpendicularity to .008 in.
The perpendicularity with respect to Datum A can be set by selecting the
datum from the drop down menu to the right side of the perpendicularity edit
box. Repeat same for the perpendicularity of .005 in with respect to datum
C.
Close

Click the Feature Information tab to check the feature properties.

The above picture shows that the perpendicularity of datum B with respect to A is
less than the desired value and thus the feature is a Pass.
The above picture shows that the perpendicularity of datum B with respect to C is
more than the desired value and thus the feature is a fail.
Assign Datum C

 Right click on Plane

Select Edit GD&T option
In the GD&T dialogue box, set the tolerance for perpendicularity to 0.008 in.
The perpendicularity with respect to Datum A can be set by selecting the
datum from the drop down menu to the right side of the perpendicularity edit
box.

The above picture shows that the perpendicularity of datum C with respect to A is
nearer to the desired value and thus the feature is a pass.
Angularity W.r.t C

The software has an implied angle of 0 degrees unless the operator includes an
angle override. This can be done by right clicking on the angularity edit box and
clicking angle override option. Enter the desired angle value in the angle input
dialogue box and press OK. In this project, the angle for this plane is 45 degrees.
The above picture shows that the angularity with respect to datum C is within the
desired value and thus the feature is a pass.
Assign Datum F

 Right click on Plane

Select Edit GD&T option
In the GD&T dialogue box, set the tolerance for perpendicularity to .008 in.
The perpendicularity with respect to Datum A can be set by selecting the
datum from the drop down menu to the right side of the perpendicularity edit
box. Repeat same for the perpendicularity of .009 in with respect to datum
G.
Close

Click the Feature Information tab to check the feature properties.

The above picture shows that the perpendicularity with respect to datum A is
within the desired value and thus the feature is Pass.
The above picture shows that the perpendicularity with respect to datum G is not
within the desired value and thus the feature is fail.

Assign Datum G

 Right click on Plane

Select Edit GD&T option
In the GD&T dialogue box, set the tolerance for angularity to .010 in. The
angularity with respect to Datum B can be set by selecting the datum from
the drop down menu to the right side of the angularity edit box.
Close

The software has an implied angle of 0 degrees unless the operator includes an
angle override. This can be done by right clicking on the angularity edit box and
clicking angle override option. Enter the desired angle value in the angle input
dialogue box and press OK. In this project, the angle for this plane is 91 degrees.
Pull up the Feature Information tab to check the feature properties.
The above picture shows that the angularity with respect to datum B is within the
desired value and thus the feature is a pass.
Assign Datum E

 Right click on Plane

Select Edit GD&T optio3. In the GD&T dialogue box set the tolerance for
total run out to .007 in. The total run out with respect to Datum D can be set
by selecting the datum from the drop down menu to the right side of the run
out edit box.
Close

Click the Feature Information tab to check the feature properties.

The above picture shows that the total run out with respect to datum D is not
within the desired value and thus the feature is a fail.

Functional Gauge

Parallelism with respect to Datum A

Work piece can be determined to an accuracy gage surface to reproduce concerning

Datum A. A dial pointer was keep running over different focuses all through the
top rectangular surface and the whole scope of marker movement was measured.

Feature

Characteristic

Tolerance

Actual

Deviation

Pass/Fail

Parallelism

.007

.018

-0.008

Fail

Flatness of top surface with respect to A

Work piece is placed on gage block to lift it up so it could be supported

and measured on the top surface while supported upside down as shown in
the picture below. The bottom end of the small cylinder is placed in such a
way that it not touching the simulated plane as shown. A dial indicator was run
along at various points on the bottom surface and noted.

Feature

Characteristic

Tolerance

Actual

Deviation

Pass/Fail

Flatness

0.007

0.015

-0.008

Fail

Perpendicularity of B with respect to A

Artifact was clamped to a precision gage block to secure a simulated

Datum A. A dial indicator was run up and down across Datum B in several lines
perpendicular to Datum A.

Feature

Characteristic

Tolerance

Actual

Deviation

Pass/Fail

Perpendicularity

0.008

0.015

-0.007

Fail

Perpendicularity of B with respect to C

Artifact was clamped to a precision gage block but aligned with another
precision gage block to simulate Datum C. A dial indicator was run across the
length of Datum B in a line perpendicular to Datum C.

Feature

Characteristic

Tolerance

Actual

Deviation

Pass/Fail

Perpendicularity

0.005

0.023

-0.0018

Fail

Perpendicularity of C with respect to A

Ancient rarity was clasped to an exactness gage square to mimic Datum A. A

dial marker was keep running in vertical lines crosswise over Datum C to in a few
lines opposite to Datum A.

Feature

Characteristic

Tolerance

Actual

Deviation

Pass/Fail

Perpendicularity

0.008

.006

0.002

Pass

Perpendicularity of F with respect to A

Artifact was clamped to a precision gage block to simulate Datum A. A

dial indicator was run in vertical lines across Datum F to in several lines
perpendicular to Datum A.

Feature

Characteristic

Tolerance

Actual

Deviation

Pass/Fail

Perpendicularity

0.008

0.015

-0.007

Fail

Perpendicularity of F with respect to G

Artifact was clamped to a precision gage block and aligned to another

precision gage block to simulate Datum G. A dial indicator was run across the
length of Datum F perpendicular to Datum G.

Feature

Characteristic

Tolerance

Actual

Deviation

Pass/Fail

Perpendicularity

0.009

0.025

-0.016

Fail

Angularity of G with respect to B

Artifact was aligned on the sine plate and supported by a precision gage. A
.175 gage block was used in the sine plate to create the 91 degree angle specified.
A dial indicator was run across the length of the feature.

Feature

Characteristic

Tolerance

Actual

Deviation

Pass/Fail

Angularity

0.010

0.035

-0.025

Fail

Angularity with respect

to C
Work piece was put in a V-square
supporting Datum D. A dial marker was put on the component and the part was
turned. This was rehashed in 3 areas along the length of the barrel for the aggregate
marker perusing.

Feature

Characteristic

Tolerance

Actual

Deviation

Pass/Fail

Angularity

0.010

0.004

0.006

Pass

Total run out with respect to Datum D

Artifact was placed in a V-block supporting Datum E. A dial indicator was
placed on the feature and the part was rotated. This circular indicator reading was
recorded.

Feature

Characteristic

Tolerance

Actual

Deviation

Pass/Fail

10

Total Run Out

0.007

0.0279

-0.0209

Fail

Circular
run

out

with
respect to Datum D
Artif
supporting
This
circular
indicator
reading
was
recorded.

act was placed in a V-block

Datum E. A dial indicator
was placed on the feature and the part was rotated.

Feature

Characteristic

Tolerance

Actual

Deviation

Pass/Fail

11

Circular Run Out

0.003

0.002

0.001

Pass

Conclusion
In this whole process of the estimations utilizing format gages and the Faro
arm, most of the segments that were measured passed on similar qualities. When
one region of the part failed testing at functional gage and same region is failed
while testing at Faro arm, when part passed at one positon at functional gages and
it is passed at Faro arm too, and most of results at functional gage and Faro arm
are similar with varying from 0.002 of all readings and some has a much
difference of around 0.0316.

For fast estimations one would consider the utilitarian gage to be a superior
representation, however as the measure of time spent measuring point's expansions
I would anticipate that the arm will overwhelm the useful gage quickly.
In perspective of the results of the estimations using organization gages and the
Faro arm,. Right when a part failed with the outline gages, it also failed with the
Faro arm, and then again, when a component achieved a passing regard with the
configuration gages, it similarly passed using the Faro arm. A couple of the
qualities were within .002" of each other, while others varied as much as .0245". A
great part of the time, the configuration gage method should wind up being a more
correct technique, altogether on account of the quantity of centers measured.
Exactly when decoding levelness and parallelism, the marker was cleared over a
generous piece of the entire surface, while using the Faro arm, 10 centers or
something to that effect were used to portray the planes, and it is likely that we
didn't get the extremes in assortment of the surface In near way, when allotting
indirect run and total run out, the pointer was cleared along the entire border of the

relic, however the Faro arm simply collected a foreordained number of core
interests.