Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Title:
Technology
Unique Identifier:
240-55864490
GGP 0922
Area of Applicability:
Engineering
Documentation Type:
Standard
Revision:
Total Pages:
10
November 2015
Disclosure Classification:
CONTROLLED
DISCLOSURE
Compiled by
Approved by
Authorised by
..
..
..
J. Hlabangana
A. Wiid
I. Atiya
Senior Engineer
Corporate Specialist
Date:
Date:
Date:
Supported by TDAC
..
D. Odendaal
TDAC Chairperson
Date:
Unique Identifier:
Revision:
Page:
240-55864490
1
2 of 10
CONTENTS
Page
1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................................... 3
2. SUPPORTING CLAUSES ........................................................................................................................................ 3
2.1 SCOPE .............................................................................................................................................................. 3
2.1.1 Purpose ..................................................................................................................................................... 3
2.1.2 Applicability................................................................................................................................................ 3
2.2 NORMATIVE/INFORMATIVE REFERENCES .................................................................................................. 3
2.2.1 Normative .................................................................................................................................................. 3
2.2.2 Informative ................................................................................................................................................. 3
2.3 DEFINITIONS .................................................................................................................................................... 4
2.3.1 Disclosure Classification ........................................................................................................................... 4
2.4 ABBREVIATIONS .............................................................................................................................................. 4
2.5 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES .................................................................................................................... 4
2.6 PROCESS FOR MONITORING ........................................................................................................................ 4
2.7 RELATED/SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS ......................................................................................................... 5
3. SPLICE DESIGN FOR STEELCORD REINFORCED CONVEYOR BELTING ...................................................... 5
3.1 DESIGN PROCEDURE ..................................................................................................................................... 5
3.2 FACTORS DETERMINIG SPLICING LIFE ....................................................................................................... 9
3.3 ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS ................................................................................................................. 10
4. AUTHORISATION .................................................................................................................................................. 10
5. REVISIONS ............................................................................................................................................................ 10
6. DEVELOPMENT TEAM ......................................................................................................................................... 10
7. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...................................................................................................................................... 10
FIGURES
Figure 1: Section of 1-stage joint .................................................................................................................................. 5
Figure 2: Section of 2-stage joint .................................................................................................................................. 5
Figure 3: Joint design ................................................................................................................................................... 8
Figure 4: Joint and overlap lengths .............................................................................................................................. 9
CONTROLLED DISCLOSURE
When downloaded from the EDMS, this document is uncontrolled and the responsibility rests with the user to ensure it is in line
with the authorised version on the system.
Unique Identifier:
Revision:
Page:
240-55864490
1
3 of 10
1. INTRODUCTION
This procedure was compiled by combining the latest knowledge available regarding steelcord reinforced
conveyor belt splice design theory obtained by leaders in the field through physical testing and
modelling.
2. SUPPORTING CLAUSES
2.1 SCOPE
The scope of this document is the empirical design procedure of steelcord reinforced conveyor belt
splices according to the latest information available. Further guidance and procedures to be followed
when making joints on-site can be obtained from Procedure for On-site Jointing of Plied Textile and
Steelcord Reinforced Conveyor Belting, Eskom Standard 240-55864486. This document also just
discusses 1-stage and 2-stage joints, which is the only joint configurations probable to be used with belts
of strength currently in use on Eskoms power plants.
2.1.1 Purpose
The purpose of this document is to sensitise the user of steelcord reinforced conveyor belting to the
importance of the choice of parameters such as cord spacing, upon ordering of replacement conveyor
belting, on the ultimate successful joining to other sections of belting probably already installed on the
conveyor system. Although the same class of belt may be ordered, if the parameters of cord spacing,
cord diameter and number of cords is not specified correctly, it may never be possible to construct a
splice of maximum strength using belting of different configurations.
2.1.2 Applicability
This procedure is applicable to any known configuration of steelcord reinforced conveyor belt joint.
This document shall apply throughout Eskom Holdings Limited Divisions.
2.2 NORMATIVE/INFORMATIVE REFERENCES
The following documents were used for the compilation of this procedure:
2.2.1 Normative
[1]
DIN 22 131 Part 4: Steel Cord Conveyor Belts for General Materials Handling: Belt joints,
dimensions and requirements, Deutsches Institut fur Normung, November 1988.
[2]
Flebbe, F.R., Dynamic Splice Strength Design Criterion for Conveyor Belts, The Best of Bulk
Solids Handling, Belt Conveyor Technology, Volume I/94, pp. 243-247, November 1991, Trans
Tech Publications.
[3]
Hager, M. and Von der Wroge, H., Design of Steel Cord Conveyor Belt Splices, The Best of Bulk
Solids Handling, Belt Conveyor Technology, Volume I/94, pp. 243-247, November 1991, Trans
Tech Publications.
[4]
Harrison, A.: Limitations of Theoretical Splice Design for Steel Cord Belts, Bulk Solids Handling,
Volume 14, Number 1, January/March 1994, pp. 39 - 41, Trans Tech Publications.
[5]
Nordell, L., Qiu, X. and Sethi, V.: Belt Conveyor Steel Cord Splice Analysis, Using Finite Element
Methods, The Best of Bulk Solids Handling, Belt Conveyor Technology, Volume I/94, pp. 225230, November 1991, Trans Tech Publications.
2.2.2 Informative
None
CONTROLLED DISCLOSURE
When downloaded from the EDMS, this document is uncontrolled and the responsibility rests with the user to ensure it is in line
with the authorised version on the system.
Unique Identifier:
Revision:
Page:
240-55864490
1
4 of 10
2.3 DEFINITIONS
Definition
Description
Splice
A splice is a joint in the belt where the cords from the ends of two belt lengths
are joined together across rubber interlayers to transmit the tensile load. The
joint shall be tapered and the ends of the cords shall be staggered to remove
the load from the joint when the belt is bent over pulleys. To join two belt
ends, the rubber is removed from the steel cords, leaving a slight amount of
residual rubber. The cords are interlaced parallel to each other in one plane.
They are surrounded with raw rubber, which acts as a spacing rubber section
between the cords and the cover rubbers above and below the cords. The
splice prepared in this way is then vulcanised in a heated press.
The splices represent weak spots in the conveyor belt, their strength being
lower than the nominal strength of the untampered belt. This has been
established in the past, particularly through dynamic belt tests. This
experimental method involves testing conveyor belt specimens on a revolving
loop test rig under saw tooth shaped long-term loading (180 000 revolutions).
The reference fatigue strength of a splice, which is defined analogously to the
fatigue strength of metal materials, is considerably lower than the nominal
strength of the untampered belt. ST 1250 stage 1 splices, for example,
attained fatigue strengths of up to 65%, while in type ST 5000, belts it is
currently 50% maximum.
Structurally, steel cord reinforced conveyor belts are composite bodies. The
longitudinal tensile forces are taken up by many parallel steel cords laid out
with alternating left and right hand twist and embedded in core and cover
rubber. The rubber provides protection against the bulk material and the
environment.
Conveyor belts are first joined, to form a continuous belt, during installation
on the conveyor system on site. This is mainly due to the fact that both the
roll diameter and roll weight of the belts represent limits, both in
transportation as well as in handling. Conveyor belts are therefore made up
by joining together a number of conveyor belt sections through hot vulcanised
splices, these sections rarely exceeding 400 m. Each conveyor belt has at
least one and generally a number of splices.
Description
mm
millimetre
CONTROLLED DISCLOSURE
When downloaded from the EDMS, this document is uncontrolled and the responsibility rests with the user to ensure it is in line
with the authorised version on the system.
Unique Identifier:
Revision:
Page:
240-55864490
1
5 of 10
CONTROLLED DISCLOSURE
When downloaded from the EDMS, this document is uncontrolled and the responsibility rests with the user to ensure it is in line
with the authorised version on the system.
sG
t
n st 1
n st
Unique Identifier:
Revision:
Page:
240-55864490
1
6 of 10
sG 0.1d 1.5
The empirically determined correction value, , which takes into account the dependency of the cord
bond strength, Fa on the thickness of the rubber layer, sG between the cords in the joint can now be
determined with the following formula. It only applies up to a maximum of sG = 5 mm.
CONTROLLED DISCLOSURE
When downloaded from the EDMS, this document is uncontrolled and the responsibility rests with the user to ensure it is in line
with the authorised version on the system.
l Anb
Unique Identifier:
Revision:
Page:
240-55864490
1
7 of 10
2 * Fb * nst *10 3
Fa *
lst
l Anb
xsv
nb
CONTROLLED DISCLOSURE
When downloaded from the EDMS, this document is uncontrolled and the responsibility rests with the user to ensure it is in line
with the authorised version on the system.
Unique Identifier:
Revision:
Page:
240-55864490
1
8 of 10
ls , l p 4d 5
lq 15d 50
The overlap length, lu [mm] (belt requirement) for making a joint is then calculated to be:
lu lv la
CONTROLLED DISCLOSURE
When downloaded from the EDMS, this document is uncontrolled and the responsibility rests with the user to ensure it is in line
with the authorised version on the system.
Unique Identifier:
Revision:
Page:
240-55864490
1
9 of 10
where la = 0.3 x B
and B = belt width [mm]
Environmental conditions moisture, humidity, dust, handling (cleanliness) and temperature of the
splice area.
Materials age, shelf life, size of tie gum strips for the splice stage (step), type of solvents,
compatibility of covers to bonder material, new to old belt splicing issues.
Mechanical splice step design, cord spacing for the particular chosen step and cord diameter,
splice length, length of butt gaps on the splice, matching belts from different manufacturers, splice
curing time, lay-up quality, splice straightness.
The not so obvious factors that may limit splice life include those that are field or in-service related and in
particular drift in cable location during the splice curing process. Reviewing these, one may list the
following points that limit splice life after fabrication:
CONTROLLED DISCLOSURE
When downloaded from the EDMS, this document is uncontrolled and the responsibility rests with the user to ensure it is in line
with the authorised version on the system.
Unique Identifier:
Revision:
Page:
240-55864490
1
10 of 10
Impact of material inter-cord rubber volume, rupture due to high shear loads, bond failure at the
cable interface, broken cables, tunnelling of cords without chemical adhesion (leaving a bulge
eventually.
Skive lifting poor splice cover/belt adhesion, belt scrapers causing skives to crack at the new/old
interface followed by fines ingress further opening up the skive, water enters the splice, splice
corrodes.
Excessive sag at load points high splice shear coupled with impact at the load point.
Belt edge vibration rapid cycling at up to 15 Hz of splice edge in resonant zones of the conveyor.
Starting/stopping stresses splices that experience high dynamic stresses in high tension zones of a
conveyor may exhibit skive damage.
Fabrication variations movement of splice cables in the vertical and horizontal plane during the
curing process, leads to weaker splices, shift in tension centre-line, mistracking, edge damage.
Belting issues belts manufactured with latent strains will result in abnormal splice stresses.
pulley curvature.
pulley surface.
4. AUTHORISATION
This document has been seen and accepted by:
Name & Surname
Designation
Document Approved by TDAC 16 July 2013
5. REVISIONS
Date
November 2012
November 2012
Rev.
0.1
1
Compiler
T. Khosa
T. Khosa
Remarks
Draft document for Review created from GGP 0922
Final document for approval
6. DEVELOPMENT TEAM
The following people were involved in the development of this document:
None
7. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
None
CONTROLLED DISCLOSURE
When downloaded from the EDMS, this document is uncontrolled and the responsibility rests with the user to ensure it is in line
with the authorised version on the system.