Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SELFACTUALIZATION IN GIFTED
AND AGGRESSIVE YOUNG PEOPLE
Irena PufalStruzik
forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://
www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
Irena Pufal-Struzik1
A total of 80 students aged seventeen and eighteen (40 in each group) selected from
several secondary schools took part in the study. It was assumed that the intensity
of self-acceptance among gifted young people is positively influenced by intellectual
success, as well as by the following personality traits: internal locus of control,
average or low level of anxiety, strong sensation seeking. There was a trend
towards higher self-actualization among gifted students (although statistically
insignificant), while self-actualizing students had an internal locus of control and a
need for stimulation and varied experience. The assumption that lower anxiety and
higher self-acceptance are characteristic of young people with higher selfactualization was not confirmed, which suggests that there is a need to intensify
parents' and teachers' support for students coping with difficulties.
Self-actualization is an inborn tendency which leads to a high level of psychological
autonomy and maturity. It seems advisable to regard self-actualization as a dynamic
process leading to full realization of potentials, a dynamic tendency towards
actualizing these potentials. According to Strzalecki (1989), realization of this
tendency is favoured by the projection of personal aims and intentions into the future,
by the guiding of goals and values by the "ideal self, and by the ability to give up
immediate gratifications. Referring to this type of behaviour, Obuchowski (1985,
p. 132) wrote that it is typical of people of "long term efficiency" in action.
The most frequently cited factors favouring self-actualization are as follows:
motivation for long term achievement and ambition (Allport, 1963; Barron, 1963;
Obuchowski, 1985; Rogers, 1962; Strzalecki, 1989), ability to set oneself tasks and
plan actions (Obuchowski, 1985; Strzalecki, 1989), readiness to give up immediate
gratification, independence of mind and action, initiative (Drwal, 1972; Gough &
Woodworth, 1960; Kmiecik, 1983; Zuk, 1986), domination and ability to relieve
1
53
METHOD
The study reported in this paper aimed at finding causal relationships between
selected personality traits and self-actualization among young people who were highly
intellectually gifted but free from aggressive tendencies, by comparing them with
people of average gifts and high aggression. In the first stage (February - March,
1994) 80 students of seventeen and eighteen (from 25 classes) were selected from five
general secondary schools. Among them were 40 students showing specific
intellectual talents for arts or science subjects accompanied by good results in other
subjects. These young people had entered the nationwide finals of contests in a given
school subject (held in Poland every year) after success in intermediate level contests
in their districts. No aggression was found in the behaviour of these students (low
scores on a test of aggression). The other group consisted of students of average gifts
(showing no specific talents for any subject) with a high level of aggression in
behaviour. The Buss-Durkee test was used to measure aggression.
In the second stage (April - May, 1994) a questionnaire prepared by the author
and psychological interviews were used to assess self-actualization among young
people. The statements in the questionnaire and the questions used in interviews dealt
with the following traits of behaviour crucial for self-actualization: the way the term
"self-actualization" is understood and the awareness of its importance to an individual,
tendencies towards reflectiveness about oneself and one's life, the degree to which
aims and ambitions were defined and put into perspective, a sense of complete
personality development, taking notice of obstacles to such development, being fit
and effective in action, satisfaction with oneself and one's achievements, perceptible
support and help from one's family when in need versus excessively intense family
pressure, a sense of independence and freedom, self-determination, tendencies toward
self-improvement and self-criticism. The personality aspects whose connections with
self-actualization among young people were investigated were as follows: locus of
control (LOC), anxiety, self-acceptance and the need for strong sensations, which is
typical of both self-actualizing persons and all young people.
Locus of control was measured by the Questionnaire for Testing Control (QTC)
worked out by Krasowicz and Kurzyp-Wojnarska (1990). The QTC is used to assess a
personality variable called the "control of behaviour consequences," which is
54
RESULTS
The analysis of the data showed that there were more students with higher selfactualization among the gifted students (the ratio was 48.0% compared with 31,6% in
the group of aggressive students), but these differences did not reach the level of
statistical significance ( 2 = 2.22; df=1; ns). Students of both groups, as a rule,
understood the notion of self-actualization well, i.e., making full use of personal
55
potentials, defining and actualizing planned aims, attaining a state of placidity and
harmony due to "fashioning one's own character" and self-improvement.
Students of both groups were different in respect of aspects of behaviour typical
of self-actualizing people such as satisfaction with achievements of an intellectual
nature, level of knowledge and educational success. The differences were in favour of
gifted students; at the same time, within the same group, self-critical opinions were
observed which reflected considerable insight into themselves. The traits which the
students regarded as insufficiently developed for them to be fully satisfied and to
accept themselves were as follows: unsatisfactory will-power and persistence,
insufficient diligence and self-control in difficult situations (46.0% of opinions).
Aggressive students were mostly dissatisfied with their lack of conscientious
behaviour, excessive impulsiveness, readiness to be in conflict with others, laziness
and tendency to tell lies. Such critical opinions were not so common in the group
characterized by high levels of aggressive behaviour (23,7% of opinions).
Gifted students reflected on the aims they wanted to achieve more frequently, and
they were more particular about what they wanted out of life to make it complete.
They gave priority to attaining their planned aims such as taking a degree at a
renowned university, having a thorough knowledge of the surroundings, experiencing
lofty sentiments, improving others' lives, penetrating the secrets of the universe and
the truth about God (one of the girls summed it up like this: "fighting one's way
through life against the stream in a way, but effectively and onwards"). They also
mentioned finding satisfaction, expecting the best (optimism) but not at the cost of
other people (sensitivity), and in accordance with accepted values and rules ("living
up to high ideals," one of the students said) (52.6% of opinions).
According to gifted students and aggressive students of low self-actualization,
among the factors hindering full self-actualization are: unfavourable conditions for
full personality development at home (lack of support and help from the family) and
at school ("slaughters" carried out by teachers - the students' phrase), limited contacts
with students of the same age outside school because of excessive school
responsibilities, too little time for pursuing their own interests and "domination of
emotion over reason" shown by excessive impulsiveness in behaviour. In the
aggressive group, there were critical opinions concerning only excessive dependence
upon parents hindering full self-actualization, being under strong family pressure to
do well in school, parents taking no notice of their child's real abilities, conflicts
between parents and children (18.8% of opinions). In respect of other features
associated with self-actualization there were no differences among the students under
examination.
As expected, the relationship between self-actualization and locus of control was
statistically significant. The high level of generalized LOC indicating a general
tendency to accept responsibility was typical of self-actualizing people, and signified
internal locus of control ( 2 = 3.93; df=1; p = 0.05). Of course, the scales S and F
(LOC for successes and failures) were correlated with generalized LOC, and related
56
DISCUSSION
The students in this study showed a tendency towards self-actualization, full
development, and looking at themselves in perspective. Although the observed
differences in self-actualization favouring gifted students did not reach the level of
statistical significance, it is possible to argue (with appropriate reservations) that they
result from visible successes of an intellectual nature (success in competitions) and
better adaptability to the school situation (Panek, 1977). At the same time, the success
enjoyed by gifted students was not enough to bring full self-acceptance. Aggression
(as the result of frustrated desires) resulting in a great many conflicts for students from
the second group and leading to failures in interpersonal contacts was not associated
with lower self-actualization, in spite of a lower level of success in these students.
Students in both groups showed a high level of self-criticism leading, in the case of
gifted students, to low acceptance of those traits of personality and characteristics of
behaviour that interfere with the efficiency of self-actualization. One of the most
important personality factors guiding the behaviour of the students in this study with
various levels of self-actualization turned out to be a sense of effective control over
events and themselves. This trait shows whether and to what extent students regard
themselves as in control of their own activities and able to bring about changes
themselves (Kofta, 1979; Sek, 1991). Students with internal locus of control are more
often intelligent young people who are responsible, effective in action, and more
strongly self-actualizing (see Krasowicz, Kurzyp & Wojnarska, 1990).
The result giving rise to concern is the high and very high level of anxiety among
the students. This also became obvious in interviews in the form of misgivings about
57
the future, doubt about the chances of carrying out planned tasks under unstable
political conditions and concern about financial difficulties in a great many families.
Such deep anxiety is sure to hinder the process of self-actualization (see Maslow,
1986). The urgent need for social support on the part of the family and school as well
as for seeking effective dialogue with young people is apparent.
REFERENCES
Allport, G.W. (1963). Pattern and growth in personality. In F. Barron (Ed.), Creativity
and psychological health. New York: Van Nostrand.
Drwal, R.L. (1972). Emocjonalne i osobowosciowe uwarunkowania efektywnosci
pracy tworczej [Emotional and personality determinants of effective and creative
work]. Prace Naukoznawcze i Prognostyczne Politechniki Wroclawskiej
[Theoretical and Applied Reports from the Breslau Polytechnicum], 7, 35-49.
Fromm, E. (1970). Ucieczka od wolnosci. [Escape from freedom]. Warsaw:
Czytelnik.
Gough, H.G. & Woodworth, D.W. (1960). Stylistic variations among professional
research scientists. Journal of Psychology, 49, 87-98.
Karylowski, J. (1975). Z badan nad mechanizmami ustosunkowan interpersonalnych.
[Studies on mechanisms of positive social orientation]. Warsaw: Ossolineum.
Kmiecik, K. (1983). Informacje oceniajace, samoocena ipoczucie kontroli a myslenie
tworcze. [Evaluative information, self-esteem, locus of control, and creative
thinking]. Warsaw: Ossolineum.
Kofta, M. (1979). Samokontrola a emocje. [Self-control and emotions]. Warsaw:
PWN.
Krasowicz, G., & Kurzyp-Wojnarska, A. (1990). Kwestionariusz do badania poczucia
kontroli. [Questionnaire for testing control]. Warsaw: Polskie Towarzystwo
Psychologiczne.
Lukaszewski, W. (1984). Szanse rozwoju osobowosci. [The chances of personal
development]. Warsaw: PWN.
Maslow, A.H. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper.
Maslow, A.H. (1959). Creativity in self-actualizing people. In H.H. Anderson (Ed.),
Creativity and its cultivation. New York: Harper.
Maslow, A.H. (1986). W strone psychologii istnienia. [Toward a psychology of
being]. Warsaw: PAX.
Obuchowski, K. (1985). Adaptacja tworcza. [Creative adaptation]. Warsaw: KIW.
Oleszkiewicz-Zsurzs, Z. (i982). Demand for stimulation and vocational preferences.
Polish Psychological Bulletin, 13, 185-195.
Painter, F. (1993). Kim sa wybitni? [Who are the gifted?]. Warsaw: WSIP.
58
59