These monarchs consolidated their absolute power over their territories during religious wars. They then recognized each other's independence to reduce conflicts over religion, affirm each other's authority, and reduce the status of other international actors. This led to the emergence of a state system and society of states based on the balance of power and interests, developing norms and international legal rules of conduct known as the Westphalian system. Over time, scholars and diplomats developed the view that its virtue was allowing states to coexist peacefully through tolerating different ways of life.
In non-European worlds, the actors, balances of power and interests, and norms of international relations were different, ultimately for a different purpose of order. European activity abroad primarily aimed
Original Description:
ghuiop
Original Title
These Monarchs Consolidated Their Absolute Sovereignty Over Their Territorial
These monarchs consolidated their absolute power over their territories during religious wars. They then recognized each other's independence to reduce conflicts over religion, affirm each other's authority, and reduce the status of other international actors. This led to the emergence of a state system and society of states based on the balance of power and interests, developing norms and international legal rules of conduct known as the Westphalian system. Over time, scholars and diplomats developed the view that its virtue was allowing states to coexist peacefully through tolerating different ways of life.
In non-European worlds, the actors, balances of power and interests, and norms of international relations were different, ultimately for a different purpose of order. European activity abroad primarily aimed
These monarchs consolidated their absolute power over their territories during religious wars. They then recognized each other's independence to reduce conflicts over religion, affirm each other's authority, and reduce the status of other international actors. This led to the emergence of a state system and society of states based on the balance of power and interests, developing norms and international legal rules of conduct known as the Westphalian system. Over time, scholars and diplomats developed the view that its virtue was allowing states to coexist peacefully through tolerating different ways of life.
In non-European worlds, the actors, balances of power and interests, and norms of international relations were different, ultimately for a different purpose of order. European activity abroad primarily aimed
These monarchs consolidated their absolute sovereignty over their territorial
possessions during thewars of religion; they then adopted a practice of
recognizing their mutual independence partly to reduce conflicts among themselves over religious questions, but also so as to affirm each others authority and reduce the status of other kinds of international actors. The emergence of a states-system and a society of states depended, in short, on a certain conjunction of power and interests, through which developed the norms of acceptable or appropriate conduct and the international legal rules and institutions of what has come to be known, accurately or not, as the Westphalian system. Although the systems beginnings lay in the self-interested activities of absolutist monarchs, gradually scholars, statesmen and diplomats developed an account of the moral purposes of this kind of international order, arguing that its great virtue lay in its ability to handle the political and cultural pluralism of modern Europe, allowing states to live together in moderately peaceful coexistence through the toleration of their different ways of life. Something else unfolded in the world beyond Europe, with different actors; different conjunctions of power and interest; different norms, rules and institutions of international relations; and, ultimately, a different purpose for international order. The range of actors was more diverse, including the absolutist monarchs from the orthodox narrative, but also chartered corporations engaged in trade and colonization, noble proprietors, individual settlers, colonial administrators, and, of course, indigenous rulers and peoples. And instead of monarchs trying to consolidate their absolute authority, the principal thrust of European activity in the world beyond Europe was the acquisition of wealth through the control of trade; not simply trade itself, but the manipulation and monopolization of trade with East and West. There were two main ways to establish control over trade: through the establishment of colonies of settlers from the mother country, or by inserting the European power into indigenous networks of political authority and commerce. Depending on the circumstances at hand, different approaches met with differing degrees of success. The British, who managed to establish themselves as the European colonial power par excellence, were adept at both. Over time, as with theWestphalian systems, these originally haphazard activities began to take on a regular pattern, and it becomes possible to identify certain norms, rules and institutions in the conduct of international relations in the extra-European world, which shaped expectations of appropriate or legitimate behaviour and actively worked to sustain this particular pattern of order. From the beginning, the most consistent features of European colonialism and imperialism were the division of sovereignty across territorial boundaries, and the assertion that individuals