You are on page 1of 27

Al49679

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL


OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

CHRISTOPHER HADSELL
Appellant
vs.

CATHERINE HADSELL
Respondent

Superior Court
County of Contra Costa
Case No.: Dl 1-00783 AND Dl 100775

Garrett C. Dailey
SBN: 76180
2915 McClure Street
Oakland, California 94609
Tel: (510) 465-3920
Fax: (510) 465-7348

Attorney for Respondent


CATHERINE HADSELL

Received by First District Court of Appeal

MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL FILED BY A


VEXATIOUS LITIGANT; MOTION TO DISMISS TARDY
APPEAL; AND MOTION TO DISMISS BASED ON
DISENTITLEMENT DOCTRINE

Al49679

CALIFORNIA COURT OF APPEAL


FIRST DISTRICT
CHRISTOPHER HADSELL
Appellant
V.

CATHERINE HADSELL
Respondent
Contra Costa County Case Numbers
MSDl 100775, MSDl 10783
MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL
FILED BY A VEXATIOUS LITIGANT;
MOTION TO DISMISS TARDY APPEAL;
AND
MOTION TO DISMISS BASED ON
DISENTITLEMENT DOCTRINE
I.

Unauthorized Appeal by Vexatious Litigant:


On May 3. 2016, Appellant Christopher Hadsell was declared a vexatious

litigant by the Superior Court of Contra Costa County. A copy of that Order is
filed herewith as Exhibit A 1 A subsequent order filed June 13, 2016, found that
Appellant has owed Respondent $91,869.86 in sanctions for over four years
despite having income of $21.000 per month.
A copy of the Order is filed herewith as Exhibit C. The Order states:

An earlier version of that Order was later filed on May 28, 2016. A copy of
that Order is filed herewith as Exhibit B.

1.
The Court finds that Respondent's actions in this matter
indicate a concerted effo11 to grind down the other side and delay final
determination of this matter. Consistent with the Memorandum of
Points and Authorities filed on behalf of Petitioner on October 16,
2015, and the holdings in In Re Marriage of Rifkin and Carty (2015)
234 Cal.App. 4th 1339, and In Re Marriage of Falcone vs. Fyke (2012)
203 Cal.App.4th 96, the Court finds that Respondent, Christopher
Hadsell comes within the terms of California Code of Civil Procedure
Section 391 (b )(3), and therefore, that Respondent, Christopher Hadsell
qualifies as a vexatious litigant.
2.
The Com1 Orders that while acting In Pro Persona, any
new filing of Respondent, Christopher Hadsell will require the preapproval of the Presiding Judge of the Contra Costa County Superior
Court. At this time, the Presiding Judge is Judge Austin. This ruling
regarding a pre-filing Order goes into effect at 11 :50 a.m. on April 28,
2016.
3.
The Court notes that following a lengthy trial in 2012
before Judge Treat, Respondent was sanctioned in the sum of $75,000
with accrued interest as of the filing date of October 16, 2015 of
$16,869.86, resulting in a total of $91,869.86. Respondent has failed to
pay the sanctions as ordered for a period of almost four years.
Respondent has failed to update his Income and Expense Declaration in
compliance with the local rules of Court. The most recent income
information of Respondent available to the Court was submitted in
2013 and indicates that Respondent had monthly, average income at
that time of $21,000. It is within the Court's discretion to rely upon the
income information of Respondent presented in 2013. The Court notes
that pursuant to the filings of Respondent relating to custody and
visitation, Respondent resides in a four-bedroom home in Dublin,
California which accommodates teenage children as well as himself.
The house alone is an indication that Respondent can afford to pay
even additional sanctions, and he chooses not to pay them. Based on
the conduct of Respondent and the finding that Respondent has the
ability to pay additional sanctions, the Com1 Orders Respondent to pay
additional, post-Judgment sanctions pursuant to Family Code Section
271 in the sum of $80,000.
4.
The Court finds that it is within the Court's discretion to
require that Respondent post a bond as security prior to initiating future
litigation in this matter. Prior to Respondent, acting as a self-

represented litigant, submitting any new pleadings in this matter,


Respondent shall be required to post a bond in the sum of $170,000.
Appellant's first act was to violate this order by filing this appeal in propria

persona without filing a bond. He filed a request to file new litigation with the
Presiding Judge of the Contra Costa County Superior Court on October 11, 2016,
but has not lodged a copy of an order permitting these appeals. In fact, his act of
filing these appeals without prior approval and without posting a bond was a
patent violation of the Pre filing Order.
A copy of his Notice of Appeal is filed herewith as Exhibit D.
Code Civ. Proc. 391.7 states in part:
a) In addition to any other relief provided in this title, the court may,
on its own motion or the motion of any party, enter a prefiling order
which prohibits a vexatious litigant from filing any new litigation in
the courts of this state in propria persona without first obtaining
leave of the presiding justice or presiding judge of the court where
the litigation is proposed to be filed. Disobedience of the order by a
vexatious litigant may be punished as a contempt of court.
(b) The presiding justice or presiding judge shall permit the filing of
that litigation only if it appears that the litigation has merit and has
not been filed for the purposes of harassment or delay. The presiding
justice or presiding judge may condition the filing of the litigation
upon the furnishing of security for the benefit of the defendants as
provided in Section 391.3.
(c) The clerk may not file any litigation presented by a vexatious
litigant subject to a prefiling order unless the vexatious litigant first
obtains an order from the presiding justice or presiding judge
permitting the filing. If the clerk mistakenly files the litigation
without the order, any party may file with the clerk and serve, or the
presiding justice or presiding judge may direct the clerk to file and
3

or presiding justice of this Court serve, on the plaintiff and other


parties a notice stating that the plaintiff is a vexatious litigant subject
to a prefiling order as set forth in subdivision (a). The filing of the
notice shall automatically stay the litigation. The litigation shall be
automatically dismissed unless the plaintiff within 10 days of the
filing of that notice obtains an order from the presiding justice or
presiding judge permitting the filing of the litigation as set forth in
subdivision (b ). If the presiding justice or presiding judge issues an
order permitting the filing, the stay of the litigation shall remain in
effect, and the defendants need not plead, until 10 days after the
defendants are served with a copy of the order ....
Appellant's previous request to file new litigation was summarily denied by
the Presiding Judge. (A copy of the Order is filed herewith as Exhibit E.)
Respondent requests that this appeal be immediately stayed and then
dismissed unless Appellant lodges an order from the presiding judge or the
presiding justice of this court permitting the appeal to proceed and posts a
$170,000 bond.
II.

The Appeal of the Vexatious Litigant Order is Tardy:


Appellant purports to appeal from the Vexatious Litigant Order, however

that appeal is tardy and must be dismissed as a matter of law. He purports to


appeal from the Order of May 28, 2016, a copy of which is filed herewith as
Exhibit B. However, the operative order is the Amended Prefiling Order which
was signed May 3, 2016, filed May 3, 2016, and mailed to Appellant on May 4,
2016. (See Exhibit A hereto.) That is the controlling order which determines the
time limits within which Appellant had to act. Ellis v. Ellis (2015) 23 5
Cal.App.4th 837, held if a revised judgment does not result in a "substantial

modification" of the original. the time to appeal runs from the original judgment,
not the revised one. The only difference between the two orders is that the
Amended Order, which was filed first, contains Appellant's mailing address. Thus,
it was the operative order.
Appellant's Notice of Appeal, filed October 11, 2016, purports to appeal
from the May 28th order declaring him a vexatious litigant and requiring a
prefiling order. It notes that he filed a motion for a new trial on July 11, 2016. (See
a copy of the Notice of Appeal, filed herewith as Exhibit D.)
By noting that he filed a CCP 663 notice on July 11, 2016, Appellant
appears to believe that somehow that notice extended his time to file an appeal. He
is mistaken.
Here are the operative dates:
~

February 4, 2016: Amended Prefiling Order- Vexatious Litigant mailed.


(Exhibit A.)

July 11, 2016: Appellant filed CCP 663a Notice of Intention to Move for
New Trial

October 10, 2016 Appellant filed Notice of Appeal from Vexatious Litigant
order- 158 days after the order was filed. (Exhibit D.)
Calif. Rules of Ct., rule 8.108 extends the time to file a Notice of Appeal

from an appealable order if one files a "valid notice of intention to move for a new
trial." Code of Civ. Proc. 663a requires that a notice of intention to set aside or
vacate a judgment pursuant to section 663 be made within "15 days of the date of
5

mailing of notice of entry of judgment by the clerk of the court .... " Here, the
motion for a new trial was not filed for 68 days. Hence, it was not a "valid notice
of intention to move for a new trial'' and ineffective to extend the time for
Appellant to appeal the prefiling order.
The appeal from the Amended Prefiling Order-Vexatious Litigant is tardy
and must be dismissed. (Calif Rules of Ct., rule 8.104(b ); In re Marriage of Eben-

King & King (2000) 80 Cal.App.4th 92, 114.)


IV.

Motion to Dismiss Based on Disentitlement Doctrine:


As set forth in the Order filed herewith as Exhibit C, Appellant has been

found to have the ability to comply with both the support orders and to pay the
four-years old sanctions order. In fact, he was sanctioned an additional $80,000 on
April 28, 2016. (See Findings and Order After Hearing filed June 13, 2016, a copy
of which is filed herewith as Exhibit C.) None of those sanctions have been paid.
In addition, as seen from the Declaration of Alyssa LeGrand, a Child
Support Specialist employed with the Contra Costa County of Department of
Child Support Services, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit F hereto, Appellant
is $93, 714.84 in arrears on his support obligations to Respondent and his children.
Said Declaration suggests that Appellant had the ability to voluntarily pay his
support because the Department was able to levy on $285,000 of his assets to
partially satisfy his obligations.
Although he has not formally been adjudged in contempt, the recent
findings of the Court that he has income of $200,000 per year certainly places him
6

in an attitude of contempt towards all of the courts in this state. In such


circumstances, courts apply the disentitlement doctrine and deny the moving party
access to the courts until they comply with the orders of the courts.
This was established by the Supreme Court many years ago in MacPherson

v. MacPherson (1939) 13 Cal. 2d 271, wherein the Court held that a party to an
action cannot, with right or reason, ask the aid and assistance of a court in hearing
his demands while he stands in an attitude of contempt to legal orders and
processes of the courts of this state.
Recently, in In re Marriage of Hofer (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 454, the
husband appealed from an attorney's fee order arguing that it was made without
any information as to his income or assets. The problem was that said information
had been requested, but husband refused to produce it alleging that his family,
who owned the businesses by whom he was employed, forbade it. The Court of
Appeal dismissed his appeal:
"Where a party unlawfully withholds evidence of his income and
assets, he will not be heard to complain that an order is not based on
the evidence he refuses to disclose." (Id. at p. 458.)
The basis for this ruling was the "disentitlement doctrine", which enables
an appellate court to stay or to dismiss the appeal of a party who has refused to
obey the superior court's legal orders. The dismissal of husband's appeal was an
exercise of a state court's inherent power to use its processes to induce compliance
with a presumptively valid order.

"[T]he disentitlement doctrine prevents a party from seeking


assistance from the court while that party is in 'an attitude of
contempt to legal orders and processes of the courts of this state.'"
(Id. at p. 460.)
There was no requirement that the offending party to have actually been
found in contempt. The successive orders that gave rise to sanctions contained
judicial findings that the husband had persisted in willfully disobeying the trial
court's orders.
"The principle permitting this court to stay or dismiss an appeal does
not require a formal judgment of civil contempt. It 'is based upon
fundamental equity and is not to be frustrated by technicalities,' such
as the absence of a formal citation and judgment of contempt."
(Ibid.)
The husband's refusal to comply with three separate court orders entitled
the court to dismiss his appeal.
Here, Appellant has a long and infamous history of refusing to obey court
orders with which he disagrees. He goes to any length to try to avoid them,
including literally taking them to the Supreme Court of the United States, as he did
with his appeal Al39942 (USSC case number No. 15-658.) All the while, he is not
supporting his children, paying past due spousal support and utterly disregarding
sanctions orders.
He should not be permitted to waste any more of Respondent's money
defending these appeals while he stands in an attitude of contempt to the orders of
the Superior Court.

VERff LCA.l

l<J~

that

U2ti:12~~!,ll~:::~' _,,,~~. .1.~J


('1idtt.crin1;; lhu:l~l l.. fshatu

MC-700
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY:
(To l>e completed only if a party is making the motion)
NAME:

STATE BAR NO.:

FOR COURT USE ONLY

PREPARED BY THE COURT

FIRM NAME.
STREET ADDRESS:
CITY:

STATE:

ZIP CODE:

TELEPHONE NO.:

FAX NO.:

E-MAIL ADDRESS:
ATTORNEY FOR (Name):

COURT OF APPEAL,

APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION

!XI SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA


STREET ADDRESS:
MAILING ADDRESS:
CITYANDZIPCODE:
BRANCHNAME

CASE NAME:

AMENDED

1.

7 51 p INE STREET
p. 0. BOX 911
MARTINEZ, CA 94553
FAMILY LAW BUILDING

CATHERINE HADSELL VS. CHRISTOPHER JAMES HADSELL


CASE NUMBER:

PREFILING ORDER-VEXATIOUS LITIGANT

Name and address of each plaintiff or cross-complainant

Dll-00775

or other party subject to this prefiling

order:

CHRISTOPHER JAMES HADSELL


9000 CROW CANYON RD., S-399
DANVILLE, CA 94506

2.

This prefiling order is entered pursuant to a motion made by

Dthe court

IXJ party (name):

CATHERINE HADSELL
3.

The person or persons identified in item 1, unless represented by an attorney, are prohibited from filing any new litigation in the
courts of California without approval of the presiding justice or presiding judge of the court in which the action is to be filed.

4.

The clerk is ordered to provide a copy of this order to the California Judicial Council by fax at 415-865-4329 or by mail
at the address below.

Vexatious Litigant Prefiling Orders


Judicial Council of California
455 Golden Gate Avenue
San Francisco, California 94102-3688

Date:

JUDICIAL OFFICER

Page 1of1
Form Adopted !or Mandatory Use
Judicial Council of California

MC700 [Rev. January 1. 2016!

Essential
E]Forms-

PREFILING ORDER-VEXATIOUS LITIGANT

Cc

EXHIBIT A

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA


IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA
CASE NAME: CATHERINE HADSELL VS. CHRISTOPHER JAMES HADSELL
CASE NO. Dl 1-00775
Amended Prefiling Order - Vexatious Litigant
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
I, the undersigned, certify under penalty of perjury that I am a citizen of the United States, over
18 years of age, employed in Contra Costa County, and not a party to the within action; that my
business address is Court House, Martinez, California, that I served the attached Notice, order, or
Paper by causing to be placed a true copy thereof in an envelope addressed to the parties or
attorneys for the parties, as shown below, which envelope was then sealed and postage fully
prepaid thereon, and thereafter was deposited in the United States Mail at Martinez, California,
on date shown below; that there is delivery service by the United States Mail between the place
of mailing and the place addressed. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true
and correct. Executed at Martinez, California, on May 4, 2016.
Vexatious Litigant Prefiling Order
Judicial Council of California
455 Golden Gate Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94102-3688
Copied to:

Tracy C. Wapnick, Esq.


Law Offices of Tracey C. Wapnick
1939 Harrison Street, Suite 210
Oakland, CA 94612
Christopher James Hadsell
9000 Crow Canyon Rd., S-399
Danville, CA 94506
Copy via inter-department mail:
Family Law Court Manager- Cheryl Shaver

S. Nash, CLERK OF THE COURT


BY:

.
Dorothea Johnson

DEPUTYCLERK

MC-700
ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY:
(To be completed only if a party 1s making the moffon)

NAME:

F-OR COURT USE ONLY

STATE BAR NO.:

PREPARED BY THE COURT

"IRMNAME:
STREET ADDRESS:
CITY:

STATE:

ZIP CODE:
FAX NO.:

TELEPHONE NO.:

r---1

E-MAIL ADDRESS:

l:J COURT OF APPEAL,

IXl

APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION


SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA

STREET ADDRESS:
MAiLING ADDRESS.
CITYANDZIPCODE:
BRANCHNAME:

CASE NAME:

n n f.'-.'~.' . :~.
lJ

~,f:.:;..::

- ' .. :.

'

7 51 p INE STREET
p 0. BOX 911
MARTINEZ, CA 94553
FAMILY LAW BUILDING
CATHERINE HADSELL VS. CHRISTOPHER JAMES HADSELL

CASE NUMBER:

PREFILING ORDER-VEXATIOUS LITIGANT

1.

.... _.!

;;:J

ATTORNEY FOR (Name):

Dll-00775

Name and address of each plaintiff or cross-complainant or other party subject to this prefiling order:

CHRISTOPHER JAMES HADSELL

2.

This prefiling order is entered pursuant to a motion made by

Dthe court

CATHERINE HADSELL

[XJ

party (name):

3.

The person or persons identified in item 1, unless represented by an attorney, are prohibited from filing any new litigation in the
courts of California without approval of the presiding justice or presiding judge of the court in which the action is to be filed.

4.

The clerk is ordered to provide a copy of this order to the California Judicial Council by fax at 415-865-4329 or by mail
at the address below.

Vexatious Litigant Prefiling Orders


Judicial Council of California
455 Golden Gate Avenue
San Francisco, California 94102-3688

Date:

'<::..
JUDICIAL OFFICER

TERRI MOCKLER

Form Adopted for Mandatory Use


Judicial Council of California

PREFILING ORDER-VEXATIOUS LITIGANT

EXHIBIT B

MC-70C[Rev. Jariuary 1, 2016]

Essential
,0Forms-

Dll-00775

FL-340
FORCOURTUSEONL.Y

ATTORNEY OR PARYY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, stal11 Ber number, Biid Bdc/Je9s):

Tracey C. Wapnick 195439


-Law Offices of Tracey c. Wapnick
1939 Harrison Street, Suite 210
Oakland, CA 94612
TELEPHDNEN0.:510-7

63-30QQ

Fl\XNO. (Optlons/):510-7

6 3-314 4

E-MAIL ADDRESS (OptJon9/):


ATIORNEY FOR fNameJ:

0 !L

Petitioner, Catherine Hadsell

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF Contra

Costa

7 51 Pine Street
MAl~ING ADDRESS: PO Box 911
CITY AND ZIP CODE: Martinez, CA 94553
sRANCHNAME: Peter L. Spinet ta Family Law Center
PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF: Catherine Hadsell
STREET AOCIRESS:

JUN 13 2016

[DJ

STEPHEN H. NASli CLERK OF THE COURT

! UPERIOA COURT OF THE STAl'E Of CALIFORNIA


COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA

By_ - - - - - - - - - - - ' Dep.:ty Clmk

RESPONDENT/OEFENDANT:Chr is tophe r Hadsell


OTHER PARTY:
CASE NUMBER:

Dll-00775

FINDINGS AND ORDER AFTER HEARING

1. This proceeding was heard


on (date): 04I28I16
at (time): 8 : 3 0 a. m.
In Dept.: 2 7
Room:
by Judge (name): Hon. Judge Terry Mockler
0 Temporary Judge
On the order to show cause, notice of motion or request for order filed {date): *
by (name): see below
a. IXI Petitioner/plaintiff present
CXl Attorney present (name): Tracey Wapnick
b.
RespondenUdefendant present
0 Attorney present (name):
c. IXI Other party present DCSS
!XI Attorney present (name): Mary Lindeloff

IXI

Petitioner's RFO filed l0/16/15, Respondent's RFO filed 3/17/16, Petitioner's RFO
filed 12/4/15, Respondent's RFO filed 03/14/16, Respondent's RFO filed 03/14/16

THE COURT ORDERS

2. Custody and visitation/parenting time:

As attached

on form FL-341

IX) Other

Cl

3. Child support:

As attached

on form FL-342

Other

{XI Not applicable

4. Spousal or family support:

As attached

on form FL-343

Other

IXI

5. Property orders:

As attached

Cl

on form FL-344

D
D

Other

[X) Not applicable

6. Attorney's fees

As attached

Cl

on form FL-346

IX]

Other

7. Other orders:

CXl

As attached

**

5 - 2 (ii

SIGNATURE OF ATTORNEY FOR

F~l~~8~~n~f ~'Q'~~~se
FL-340 (Rev, Januaty 1, 2012)

(eJ iss(~~Ai"iDRMr

In Dept.:

TERRI MOCKLER

\ 1

Approved as conforming to court order.

Not applicable

Respondent's request for a trial de novo

at (time):

This matter Is continued for further hearing on (date):


on the following issues: None

Date:

Not applicable

Not appllcable

8. All other issues are reserved until further order of court.


9.

Not applicable

~ - - - - -JUDICIAL
-OFFICER
--'--C:;c;:kd for :l5 ll.:k1;; 3
&N""' CP."'.' '5i_1 ".i::;~;;

PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF

RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT

OTHER PARTY
Paga I ol 1

FINDINGS AND ORDER AFTER HEARING

(Family Law-Custody and Support-Uniform Parentage)

Hadsell,

EXHIBIT C

2
3

MARRIAGE OF HADSELL
CONTRA. COSTA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, ACTION NO: Dll-00775
ATIACHMENT TO FINDINGS AND ORDER AFTER HEARING
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, THE COURT ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:

5
6
7

The Court finds that pursuant to Cal.Civ.Proc. Section 632, Respondent is not entitled to a:
written Statement of Decision. Therefore, Respondent's request for a written statement of
decision is denied. Pursuant to the request of Respondent, the Court issued an oral Statement of
Decision as follows:

I.

Petitioner's RFO filed on October 16, 2015 to have Respondent declared a

Vexatious. Litigant

10
11

12
13
14

IS
16

1. The Court finds that Respondent's actions in this matter indicate a concerted effort to
grind down the other side and delay final determination of this matter. Consistent with the
Memorandum of Points and Authorities filed on behalf of Petitioner on October 16, 2015, and the
holdings in In Re Marriage of Rifkin and Carty (2015) 234 Cal.App. 4th 1339, and In Re Marriage
of Falcone vs. Fyke (2012) 203 Cal.App.4111 96, the Court finds that Respondent, Christopher
Hadsell comes within the terms of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 391(b)(3), and
therefore, that Respondent, Christopher Hadsell qualifies as a vexatious litigant.

17
18
19

20

2. The Court Orders that while acting In Pro Persona, any new filing of Respondent,

Christopher Hadsell will require the pre-approval of the Presiding Judge of the Contra Costa
County Superior Court. At this time, the Presiding Judge is Judge Austin. This ruling regarding a
pre-filing Order goes into effect at 11 :50 a.m. on April 28, 2016.

21

22
23

24
25

26
27
28

3. The Court notes that following a lengthy trial in 2012 before Judge Treat, Respondent
was sanctioned in the sum of $75,000 with accrued interest as of the filing date of October 16,
2015 of $16,869.86, resulting in a total of $91,869.86. Respondent has failed to pay the sanctions
as ordered for a period of almost four years. Respondent has failed to update his Income and
Expense Declaration in compliance with the local rules of Court. The most recent income
infonnation of Respondent available to the Court was submitted in 2013 and indicates that
Respondent had monthly, average income at that time of $21,000. It is within the Court's
discretion to rely upon the income infonnation of Respondent presented in 2013. The Court notes
FOIJI

that pursuant to the filings of Respondent relating to custody and visitation, Respondent resides in

a four-bed.room home in Dublin, California which accommodates teenage children as well as

himself. The house alone is an indication that Respondent can afford to pay even additional

sanctions, and he chooses not to pay them. Based on the conduct of Respondent and the finding

that Respondent has the ability to pay additional sanctions, the Court Orders Respondent to pay

additional, post-Judgment sanctions pursuant to Family Code Section 271 in the sum of$80,000.

4. The Court finds that it is within the Court's discretion to require that Respondent post a

bond as security prior to initiating future litigation in this matter. Prior to Respondent, acting as a

self-represented litigant, submitting any new pleadings in this matter, Respondent shall be required

10

to post a bond in the sum of $170,000.

11

II.

12

5. Pursuant to California Rule of Court 5.74(b)(2), Respondent's request for Summary

13

Respondent's Motion for Summary Adjudication filed on March 17, 2016

Adjudication is denied.

14

III.

1S

Petitioner's Request for Order filed on December 4, 2015 for the appointment

of Minor's Counsel
6. The.Court finds that this issue is moot based on the superseding Orders issued on

16

17

March 30, 2016. Pursuant to the Stipulation stated on the record by Petitioner, this issue is

18

dropped.

19

IV.

20

vacate Orders issued on March 2, 2016

21
22

Respondent's Request for Order filed on March 14, 2016 to set aside and

7. The Court finds that this issue is moot based on the superseding Orders issued on
March 30, 2016. Respondent's request is denied.

23

V.

Respondent's Request for a Trial De Novo (DCSS)

24

8. The Department of Child Support Services to submit an Order After Hearing.

25
26

Intentionally Left Blank Below

27
28
fOAH

2.

APP-002
FOR COURT USE ONLY

ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, state bar number, and address):

Christopher Hadsell
-9000 Crow Canyon Rd., S-399
Danville, CA 94506
TELEPHONE NO.:

(925) 482-6502

FAX NO. (Optional):

E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional):


ATTORNEY FOR (Name):

Contra Costa
751 Pine St.
P.O. Box 911
Martinez. CA 94553
Peter L. Spinetta Family Law Center

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF


STREET ADDRESS:
MAILING ADDRESS:
CITY AND ZIP CODE:
BRANCH NAME:

PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER:
DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT:

Christopher Hadsell
Catherine Hadsell
CASE NUMBER:

CJ CROSS-APPEAL
(UNLIMITED CIVIL CASE)

[ZJ NOTICE OF APPEAL

MSD 11-00783
(Consolidated w/MSD 11-00775)

Notice: Please read Information on Appeal Procedures for Unlimited Civil Cases (Judicial Council form
APP-001) before completing this form. This form must be filed in the superior court, not in the Court of Appeal.

1.

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that (name):

Christopher Hadsell

appeals from the following judgment or order in this case, which was entered on (date):

CJ

Judgment after jury trial

[{]

Judgment after court trial

CJ
CJ
CJ
D

Judgment of dismissal after an order sustaining a demurrer

[ZJ

An order after judgment under Code of Civil Procedure section 904.1 (a)(2)

An order or judgment under Code of Civil Procedure section 904.1 (a)(3)-(13)

CJ
2.

4/28/16 (CCP 663 Notice filed 7/11/16);


9/8/16; 9/20/16.

Default judgment
Judgment after an order granting a summary judgment motion
Judgment of dismissal under Code of Civil Procedure sections 581d, 583.250, 583.360, or 583.430

Other (describe and specify code section that authorizes this appeal):

For cross-appeals only:


a. Date notice of appeal was filed in original appeal:
b. Date superior court clerk mailed notice of original appeal:
c. Court of Appeal case number (if known):

Date:

I 0/1 I /2016

Christopher Hadsell
(TYPE OR PRINT NAME)

Form Approved for Optional Use


Judicial Council of California
APP-002 [Rev. July 1, 2010]

(SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY)

NOTICE OF APPEAUCROSS-APPEAL (UNLIMITED CIVIL CASE)


(Appellate)

Cal

EXHIBIT D

APP-002
CASE NUMBER:

CASE NAME:

Christopher Hadsell v. Catherine Hadsell

MSD 11-00783

NOTICE TO PARTIES: A copy of this document must be mailed or personally delivered to the other party or parties to this appeal. A PARTY TO
THE APPEAL MAY NOT PERFORM THE MAILING OR DELIVERY HIMSELF OR HERSELF. A person who is at least 18 years old and is not a
party to this appeal must complete the information below and mail (by first-class mail, postage prepaid) or personally deliver the front and back of
this document. When the front and back of this document have been completed and a copy mailed or personally delivered, the original may then
be filed with the court.

PROOF OF SERVICE

Mail

Personal Service

1. At the time of service I was at least 18 years of age and not a party to this legal action.
2. My residence or business address is (specify):

Professional Process Service. 3527 Mt. Diablo Blvd., #126. Lafayette. CA 94549
and Form MC-701

3. I mailed or personally delivered a copy of the Notice of Appeal/Cross-Appeal (Unlimited Civil Case) as follows (complete either a orb):
a.

[ZJ

Mail. I am a resident of or employed in the county where the mailing occurred.

(1) I enclosed a copy in an envelope and


(a)

(b)

[ZJ

deposited the sealed envelope with the United States Postal Service, with the postage fully prepaid.
placed the envelope for collection and mailing on the date and at the place shown in items below, following
our ordinary business practices. I am readily familiar with this business's practice for collecting and processing
correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is
deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service, in a sealed envelope with
postage fully prepaid.

(2) The envelope was addressed and mailed as follows:


(a) Name of person served:

Melinda Self, Supervising Attorney, Dept. of Child Support Svcs

(b) Address on envelope:

150 Douglas Dr., Ste 100 Martinez. CA 94553


(c) Date of mailing:

October I I, 2016
Lafayette, CA

(d) Place of mailing (city and state):


b.

CJ

Personal delivery. I personally delivered a copy as follows:


(1) Name of person served:
(2) Address where delivered:

(3) Date delivered:

(4) Time delivered:


I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.
Date:

October 11. 2016

Jeanne M Kosta
(SIGNATURE OF DECLARANT)

(TYPE OR PRINT NAME)

APP-002 [Rev. July 1, 2010)

NOTICE OF APPEAL/CROSS-APPEAL (UNLIMITED CIVIL CASE)


(Appellate)

Page 2 of 2

c
MC-702
P"QR COURT

1...0URT
~000

~ ... wpher

Crow

Ddnv:i.1le~
rtt.t:PHO~.fENO
~. M4.it /.f)f.JRL>:::

C>~

use ON:. t

Ead'''';I:
Rd.
~~JG

CA
{9:2:3}

4d2=()SQ2

Dl l . () (J 7 8

.]

'01 gb~~~i~~:Et:-Per______

1
. ' ...

~-

f'Vll S
_
'
APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION
'""""' UPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF CunL .t'i:I Ccstd
srtt:rtr;.t>nPts~I

7Sl Pine St

re.<~L

p . () ~ Bo.x. 9 l .1
cTYANozwcoDE Mart::icnc,z, CA 94553
MAH.ING AUDRf.~<>

r -P:11~~;~~~h~~~ki:~:a:==~~~:~Lii~aii::Fi- ~-~L~-~\v=~;;
I
0
DEFENDANT/ RESPONDENT: eatht'!. :t fneo Hadse1 l, (' ~.

f\

(Io;.

-- \

-::~LITIGAT~~o:~J~.~~~:~-_v~

t
~
1

. \ .

Type of case:

f,

Limited. Civil

fXl F,amd~ Law

Unlimited Civil

c::J Probate

\~;;_;:~115--

Small Claims
Other

-----"'-----------'-..,;..1.~---- -~

. . . . . . . _____________ _

ORDER
Approval to file the atta~hed dbcum~nt is:

a.
b.

c.

Grant~d

Denied
Other.:

CS1

<0,:,;

(.Xl Attachmenti~toorc~: Nu~ber6fpages


,'

~c;

.42...:.......

K. AUSTIN

EXHIBIT E

11
:\9\
:-a~

..
1.
2

3
4

5
6
7

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOR THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA

11
12
13

14

Case No.: Dll-00775

Catherine Hadsell,

DCSS ACCOUNTING PURSUANT TO FAMILY


CODE 17526

Petitioner,

vs.
Christopher Hadsell,
Respondent.

15
16

DECLAR.ll,.TION

l 7

18
19

I, Alyssa LeGrand, Declare


1.

am

Child

Support

Specialist

employed

with

the

Contra

Costa

County

Department of Child Support Services (hereinafter "Department") assigned to the

20

Fiscal Unit and,

in that capacity,

charged with review of regularly maintained

21
records of payments and disbursements as required by the laws of the State of

22
California and of the United States.

23

2.

have personal knowledge of the facts as set forth herein and if called upon

24

to test:ify, could competently testify as t;o the truth of those matter set .forth

25

herein.

26

Ill

27

Ill

28

200000001358920

Dll-07755
DCSS ACCOUNTING

EXHIBIT F

3.

The

C>:Jlifcrnia

federal

child/

law

State

to

keep

Department
:~1a

and

of

i. rita in

Child

Support

records

spousaJ. and medical GUP.f>Ort.

t?ervices

re,::e itJt s

.::f

l~alifcrnia

.1.s

ma:-1dated

under

d.isbursemen~.s

and

keeps and maintains

of

reco~ds

in

simply

as

3
a

computerized

kno~"/Ii

r:;ystem

a.s

ccs1;p

~renera.Jly

CSE:,

!~eferred

to

4
The

"CSE."

SL;~~te

CalitGrn.1a

D-1.sbursernent

tc contemporaneouF;ly document,

responsi.blE:~

accord.ance wit.h fede.ral and state law.

s~~eguards

4.

recej_ve and dis::rifJute paytnent.s

i.n

am familtar with the procedures and

,; ,

2016,

based

en

c-ecords

maintained

account :.!1g

of

the

payments

a.nd

obl iga lions

for

the

by

history pro\ridecl L,y pe Lit. icJnc:r ::i.nd all currf:'!nt: orders,

is

in place to ensure accuracy and identify records.

November

On

sou)

(hereinafter

Uni.t

SDU,

the

payment

1 prepared and updatcc:

child,

spousEA 1

a11d

medicaJ.

10
support

11

in

the

abo1e

referenced

following a modification of

a,;

matter

~rnpport~

req~1esced

by

ordered by the co..irt.

our

at.torney

staff

A true and accurate

12
13

incorporated here:.n by reference. ExLibic "A" represents a total of all amounts

14

due.

.1. 5

Exhibit

"B"

represents

amounts

due

for

16

Federal law requ.i.res the Dep<<rtment t.o separate obligations by category.


amount.::; due

spousal

sup.oort

for

and

child support.:

Exhi.bi t

"D"

Exhibit

represents

"C"

represents

arnounts

due

fo.r:

medical suppoct.

17
5.

Five payments have been app1 .ied to the case:

18
a.

19
20

reported a

payment

of

$758

for

U1e mcnt:h of May 2013

when she

opened her case.


b.

2.l

22

Mother

$640.42 was paid to tl1e SDU by income withhold.i.ng order i.n September of
2013.

e.

$25S.31 was paid to the SDU by incor:e withholc'.ing order .i.n November of
2013.

23
d.

$194,199.38 was credited in January of 2014 for payments made to the SDU

24
pursuant to a notice to withhold issued pursuant to Family Code Sections
25

17453 & 17522.5.


26

e.

$90, 854. 24 was credited i.n August of 2015

for payments made to the SDU

27

pursuant to a notice to withhold issued pursuant to Family Code Sections

28

17453 & 17522.S.

200000001358920

Dll-07755
DCSS ACCOUNTING

6.

Nei.t:.her

Deparl:.ment:.

nor

SDU

records

show

a..ny

voluntary

payments

made

by

respondent other tha.n the payment reported bf petitioner.

2
7.

The

accounting

shows

respondent

owes

$93, 714. 84

in

delinquent

support

consisting of $'&8,974.37
4

in child support:,

$34,862.79

in spousal support and

$9,877.68 in medical support.

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that

the informat:..i.on .in the foregoing declarat.i.on is true and correct.

DATED: November 22, 2016

- _,__ ....,._.,.~<~ :;:,f

< . h -

'=----.;:_.::....

A:!.ys~fo. I.JeGrand

Child Support Specialist

10
11

12
13

14
15

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

24
2 .s
26

27
28
Dll-07755
200000001358920

DCSS ACCOUNTING

Simple Report
Case:
Manage Cnty:
CP:
NCP:
Court Order:

All Debt Types

200000001358920-1
Corn:ra Co:ota

CATHERINE Hl\DSELL
CHRISTOPHE? ~ADSELL
D2.l-0077S

MM-CCYY

Current
Charge

Totals: 361,538.95

Printed by bt;ari,

93, 7 Jt.J. H4

Principal

Balance

St

05-2013 142,495.00 ADJ


5,011.00
05-2013
5,011.00
05-2013
07-2013 5,011.00
5,011.00
03-2013
5,011.00
09-2013
10-2013 5,011.00
11-2013 5,011.00
12-2013 5,011.00
01-2014 5,011.00
022014 5,011.00
5,011.00
03 2014
04-2014 5,011.00
5,011.00
05-2014
06-2014 5,011.00
07-2014 5,011.00
5,011.00
082014
09 2014
5,011.00
5,011.00
10 2014
11-2014 5,011.00
12-2014 5, 011.00
01-2015 5,011.00
02-2015 5,011.00
03-2015 5,011.00
042015 5,011.00
05-201S 5,011.00
06-2015 5,011.00
5,011.00
07-2015
5,011.00
08-2015
09-2015 4,566.70
10-2015 4,606.00
11--2015 4,606.00
1.2-2015 4,605.00
01-2016 4,634.00
02-2016 4,634.00
03 2016 4,634.00
5,357.00
04-2016
5,357.00
05-2016
06-2016 5,164.54
07-2016
2,562.00
OB-2016 2,582.00
09-2016 2,582.00
102016 17,710.71 ADJ
10-2016 2,532.00
11 2Dl6 2,582.00

758.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
640.42
0.00
258.31
0.00
"94,199.38
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
90,854.24
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
286,710.35

Contra Coeta Nov 21,

83,1 0. i
10,5 4 .1
93, ' 4.8

0. 00
286, 110. 35

Support Paid

Aid

Total Principal Due


Total Interest Due
Balance Due

20i, 383 .2~


160,2G:'.1.7.1
18, 8J6. 2r.;

Total Current Charges


Total Arrears/Adjustments (Principal)
Total Interest Charges
Total Arrears/Adjustments (Interest)
Total Amount Paid
Balance Due

0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00

0. 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 00

0.00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
(). 00
0.00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. ()()
[). 00

0.00
0.00
0. (;()
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
(). 00
0. ()
0.00

0.00
0.00

G.OC
0.00
0. 00
0.00

2016 3:26pm .SA'r var 5.4& cur

146,748.00
151,759.00
156,770.00
161,781.00
166,151.58
171,162.58
17~:),

915.27

180,926.27
0.00
5,011.00
10,022.00
15, 033 .00
20,044.00
2S,055.00
30,066.00
35,077.0C
40,088.00
45,099.00
50,110.00
55,121.00

Monthly
Interest

0.00
0.00
0. 00
1,288.91
1,331.47
l,329.70
1,411.15
1,406.81
1,494.07
0.00
0.00
42.56
82.38
127.68
164.74
212. 79
255.36
288.31
340.47
370.68
425. :;9

Interest
Balance

0.00
0.00
1,288.91
2,620.38
3,950.08
'>,361.23
6,768.04
8,262.ll
0.00
0. 00

42.56
124. 94
2 52. 62
417.36
630.i.5
885.51
1,173.82
1,514.29
1,884.97
2,310.56
2,778.71
3 '240. 00
3,793.27
4,369.88
5,008.26
5,667.24
6,390.75
6,427.74
6,463.53
6,539.30
6,650.49
6,804.50
6,997.'0
7,213.99
7,485.09
7,785.43

Total Balance

146,748.00
151,759.00
158,058.91.
164,401.38
170,101.6&
176,523.81
182,683.Jl
189,188.38
0.00
5,011.0:l
10,064.56
15,157.94
20,296.62
25,472.36
30,696.15
35,962.51
41,261.82
46,613.29
51-,994.97

5~;,102.00

444.84

8,'.)29.31
8,974.15

57,684.00
60,266.00

466. 71

9,440.86

<!72. f32

9,913.68

57,431.56
62,910.71
68,383.00
73,947.27
79,534.88
85,184.26
90,854.24
96,588.75
10,782.50
1.5,384.99
20,066.76
24,783.95
29,543.96
34,370.56
39,221.45
44,126.55
1;9,783.89
55,496.61
61, 019 .31
64,076.15
67,124.86
70,179.68

80,558.71
B3,140.71

0.00
660.45
0.00

10,5'/4.13
10, 57'1.13

91,132.84
93,714.84

60,J:.)2.00

468 . .15

65,143.00
'70,154.00
75,165.00
80,176.00
85,187.00
90,198.00
4,354.76
8,921.46
.J.3,527.46
18,133.46
22,739.'16
27,373.46
32,007.46
.36,641.46
41,998.46

461.29
553.27
576.61
638.38

52,520.00

658.98
723.51
35.99
35.79
75.77
111.19
154.01
192.60
216.89
271. 1.0
300.34
355.72
388.16

47,3::)5.46

8, 1_41.15

18,836.24

p. 1

,,,

Simple Report
Case:
Manage Cnty:
CP:
NCP:
Court Order:

Child Support

200000001333920-1
Contra Costa

CATHERINE HADSELL
CHRISTOPHER HADSELL
DJ.1 .... 00T75

Total Current Charges


Total Arrears/Adjustments (Principal)
Total Interest Charges
Total Arrears/Adjustments (Interest)
Total Amount Paid
Balance Due
----r-------i

r
!

MM-CCYY) Current
Charge
05-2013 75,330.00
05-2013 2,511.00
05-2013 2,511.00
07-2013 2,511.00
08 .. 2013 2,511.00
09-2013 2,511.00
10-2013 2,511.00
11-2013 2,511.00
12 ..2003 2,511.00
01-2014 2,511.00
02 ()2014 2,511.00
03-2014 2,511.00
04- 2014 2,511.00
05 -2014 2' 511. 00
06 <2014 2,511.00
07-2014 2' 511. 00
08-2014 2,511.00
09-2014
2,511.00
10-2014 2' 511. 00
11-2014 2,511.00
12 2014 2' 511. 00
01-2015 2, 511. 00
02-2015 2,511.00
03-2Q15 2,511.00
04-2015 2,511.00
05-2015 2,511.00
06 .. 2015 2,511.-00
07-2015 2,511.00
08-2015 2' 511. 00
09-2015 2,066.70
10-2015 2,-06.00
11 .. 2015 2,106.00
12-2015 2,106.00
01-2016 2' 134. 00
02-2016 2,134.00
03-2016 2,134.00
042016 2,857.00
05-2016 2,857.00
062016 2,664.54
07-20-6 2,582.00
08-2016 2,582.00
09-2016 2,582.00
10-2016 7,915.99
10-2016 2,582.00
11-2016 2,582.00
Totals: 189,629.23

Aid
St

I
-----'

106,383.24

83,24:1.99
9,292.97

Total Principal Due


Total Interest Due
Balance Due

43, 991. 23
4, 983.14
~8,974.37

0.00
.149,947.83
48,974.37

Support Paid
------

Principal
Balance

Monthly
Interest

Interest
Balance

Tot:.'

~:1~~~-~1

------~

ADJ

0.00
758.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
640.42
0.00
258.31

o.oo
000,()82.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-7,709.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00

0.00
0.00

77,083.00
79,094.00
82,105.00
84,616.00
86,486.58
88,997.58
91,250.27
93, 761.27
0.00
2,511.00
5,022.00
7,533.00
10,044.00
12,555.00
15,066.00
17,577.00
:rn, 08B. oo
22,599.00
25,110.00
27,621.00
30,132 .. 00
32,643.00
35,154.00
37,665.00
40,176.00
42,687.00
45,198.00
0.00
2,066.70
4,172.70
6,278.70
8,384.70
-0,518.70
12,652.70
14,786.70
17,643.70
20,500.70
2:>,165.24
25,747.24
28,329.24
30,911.24

0.00
0.00

41,409.23
43,991.23

0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. CJO
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00

ADJ
0.00
0.00
1-19,947.83

0.00

Print.ad by btari, Contra Costa Nov 21, 2016 3;26pm SAT ver S.4a cur

o.oo
0.00
676.00
697.33
695.47
734.54
731.49
775.00
0 .. 00
0.00
21.33
41. 28
63.98
82.55
106 .. 63
127.96
144.47
170.61
185.75
213. 26
234.59
231.15
277.24
288.94
319. 89
330.21
362.55
0.00
0.00
17.55
34.30
53.33
71.02
83. 34
107.17
121.2149.44
168. 04
196 . 21
218.08
232.21
0.00
328.86
0.00

0.00
0.00
676.00
1,373.33
2,068.80
2,803.34
3,534.83
4,309.83
0.00
0.00
21. 33
62.61
126.59
209.14
315.77
443.73
588.20
758 .s1
944.56
1,157.82
1,392.41
1,623.56
1,900.80
2,189.74
2,509.63
2,839.84
3,202.39
3,202.39
3,202.3<:1
3,219.94
3,254.24
3,307.57
3,378.59
3,461.93
3,569.10
3,690.30
3, 839 74
4,007.78
4,203.99
4,422.07
4,654-28

77,083.00
79,594.00
82' 781. 00
85,989.33
88,555.38
91,800.92
94,785.10
98,071.10
0.00
2,511.00
5,043.33
7,595.61
10,170.59
12' 764. 14
15,381.77
18' 020. 7:3
20,676.20
23,357.81
26,054.56
28,778.82
31,524.41
34,266.56
37,054.80
39,854.74
42,685.63
45,526.84
48,400.39
3,202.39
5,269.09
7,392.64
9,532.94
11,692.27
13,897.29
16,114.63
18,355.80
21,334.00
24,340.44
27,173.02
29, 951.23
32,751.31
35,565.52

4,983.14
4,983.14

46,392.3,'
48,974.37

9-292.97

p. l

...
Simple Report
Case:
Manage Cnty:
CP:
NCP:
Court Order:

Spousal Support

200000001358920-1
Contra Costa
CATHERINE H!,DSELL
CHRISTOPHER HADSELL

Dl :-0077 s

Total Current Charges


Total Arrears/Adjustments (Principal)
Total Interest Charges
Total Arrears/Adjustments (Interest)
Total Amount Paid
Balance Due

i MMC~-~ i

Current

l.. -----~! ___Charge


05-2013 60,328.00
05-2013 2,500.00
06-2013 2,500.00
07-2013 2,500.00
08.-2013 2,500.00
09-2013 2,500.00
10-2013 2,500.00
11-2013 2,500.00
12-2013 2,500.00
01-2014 2,500.CO
02-2014 2,500.CO
03-2014 2,500.00
04-2014 2,500.00
05-2014 2,500.00
06-2014 2,500.00
07-2014 2,500.00
08 -2014 2,500.00
092014 2,500.00
10-2014 2,500.00
11-2014 2,500.00
12-2014 2,500.00
01-2015 2,500.00
02-2015 2,500.00
03-2015 2,500.00
04-2015 2,500.00
05-2015 2,500.00
06-2015 2,500.00
07-2015 2,500.00
08-2015 2,500.00
09-2015 2,500.00
10-2015 2,500.00
11-2015 2,500.00
12-2015 2,500.00
01-2016 2,500.00
02-2016 2,500.00
:J3-2016 2,500.00
04-2016 2,500.00
05-20i6
2,500.00
06-2016 2,500.00
07-2016
0.00
08-2016
0.00
09-2016
0.00
10-2016
0.00
11-2016
0.00

Totals: 155,328.00

Aid l'

~!.-. . --

Total Principal Due


Total Interest Due
Balance Due

95,000.00
60,328.00
9,~15.65

29,354. 6
~, 50iL 3
34,862. 9

0.00
129,580.86
34,862.79

Support Paid
------

Principal

...L . .

~~~-~-~~........J.

ADJ

0 100
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
86,435.62
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
43,145.24
0.00

0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00

o ~oo

0.00

o.oo
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
129,580.86

Printed by btari, Cont.ra Costa Nov 21, 2016 .3:26pro SAT

0.00

vi;~r

5.4a cur

62,828.00
65,328.00
67,828.00
70,328.00
72,828.00
75,328.00
77,828.00
80,328.00
0.00
2,500.00
.,000.00
7,500.00
10,000.00
12,500.00
15,000.00
17,500.00
20,000.00
22,500.00
25,000.00
27,500.00
30,000.00
32,500.00
35,000.00
37,500.00
40,000.00
42,500.00
45,000.00
4,354.76
6,854.76
9,354.76
11,854.76
14,354.76
16,854.76
19,354.76
21,854.76
24,354.76
26,854.76
29,354.76
29,354.76
29,354.76
29,354.76
29,354.;;16
29,354.76

0.00
0.00
0.00
554.84
576.07
578.04
618.54
619.13
661. 00
0.00
0.00
21. 23
41.10
63.70
82.19
106.16
127 .4.
143.84
169.86
184.93
212.33
233.56
230.14
276. 03
287.67
318 .49
328. 77
360.96
36.99
35.79
58.22
76.89
100.68
121.58
133. 55
163.93
1 79. ;.:_4
206.28
220.12
248.63
248.63
240.61
248. 63
0.00

0.00

o.oo
554.84
1,130.91
1,708.95
2,327.49
2,946.62
3,607.62
0.00
0.00
21.23
62.33
126.03
208.22
314 .38
441.78
585.62
755.48
940 .41
1,152.74
1,386.30
1,616.44
1,892.47
2,180.14
2,498.63
2,827.40
3,188.36
3,225.35
3,261.14
3,309.36
3,396.25
3,496.93
3,618.51
3,752.06
3,915.99
4, 095 .13
4,301.41
4,521.53
4,770.16
5,018.79
5,259.40
5,508.03
5,508.03

9, .. 15.65

p. l

62,828.00
65,328.00
68.382.84
71,458.91
74,536.95
77,655.49
80,774.62
83,935.62
0.00
2,500.00
5,021.23
7,562.33
10,126.03
12,708.22
15,314.38
17,941.78
20,585.62
23,255.48
25,940.41
28,652.74
31,386.30
34,116.44
36,892.47
39,680.14
42,498.63
45,327.40
48,188.36
7,580.11
10,115.90
12,674.12
15,251.01
17, 851. 69
20,473.27
23,106.82
25,770.75
28,449.8.9
31,156.17
33,876.29
34,124.92
34,373.55
34,614.16
34,862.79
34,862.79

Simple Report
Case:
Manage Cnty:

Medical Support

200000001358920 1

CP:
NCP:

Contr<i Costa
CATHERINE HADSELL
CHRISTOPHER HADSELL

Court Order:

DJl-00775

Total Current Charges


Total Arrears/Adjustments (Principal)
Total Interest Charges
Total Arrears/Adjustments (Interest)
Total Amount Paid
Balance Due

Aid

MMCCYY

0.00
_1_6,631.72
427.62
0.00

12A2015

01-2016
022016
03 2016
04 2016
05-2016
06-2016
07.2016
08-2016
09-2016
10-2016
10-2016
11-2016

6,837.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00

9,877.68

Support Paid

Principal

Balance

ADJ

0.00
0.00
0.00
9,794.72
0.00
0.00

Totals: 16,631.72

0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0 .00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
'.'. 00
0.00
0.00
0.00

6,837.00
6,837.00
6,837.00
6,837.00
6,837.00
6,837.00
6,837,00
6,837.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00

0.00
(]. 00

0.00

9,794.72
9,794.72

7.1s1.66

a.co

0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
7,181.66
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00

0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00

0. Ol)

9' 7 94. 72
82.96
9,877.68

7,18l.ti6

St
05-2013
05-2013
062013
07-2013
08-2013
09 2013
10 2013
11 2013
12 2013
01 20H
02-2014
03-2014
04-2014
05-2014
06 2014
07-2014
082014
092014
102014
11 2014
12 2014
01 2015
02-2015
03-2015
Ot.-2015
05-2015
06-2015
07 2015
08-2015
09-2015
1020.15
112015

Total Principal Due


Total Interest Due
Balance Due

0. 00

o.oo
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C.JO
0.00
0.00
0.00

ADJ
0.00

Printed by btari, Contra Costa Nev 21, 2016 3:27pm SAT ver S.4a cur

Monthly
Interest

0.00
0.00
0.00
58.07
58.07
56.19
58.07
56.19
58.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
82. 96
0.00

interest
Balance

Total Balance

0. OC

6,837.00
6,837.00
6,895.07
6,953.14
7,009.33
7,067.40
7,123.59
7,181.66
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. OD
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
G.00
0.00
0.00
0.00

82.96
82.96

9,877.68
9,877.68

0.00
0.00
58.07
16 .14
72.33
30.40
86.59
44. 66
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0. 00

0.00
0.00
0.00

427.62

p. 1

PROOF OF SERVICE
I, BRENDA K. PORTO, declare as follows:
I am over eighteen years of age and not a party to the within action; my business
address is 2915 McClure Street, Oakland, California 94609; I am employed in Alameda
County, California. I am familiar with my employer's practices for the collection and
processing of materials for mailing with the United States Postal Service, and that practice is
that materials are deposited with the United States Postal Service the same day of office
collection in the ordinary course of business.
On November 23, 2016, I served a copy of the following document(s): MOTION TO
DISMISS APPEAL FILED BY A VEXATIOUS LITIGANT; MOTION TO DISMISS
TARDY APPEAL; AND MOTION TO DISMISS BASED ON DISENTITLEMENT
DOCTRINE

On the addressee(s):
BY MAIL -- by placing a true copy of the above-referenced document(s) enclosed in
X
a sealed envelope, with postage fully prepaid, in the United States mail at Oakland, California,
addressed as set forth below, on the date set forth above.
__ BY FACSIMILE -- by transmitting via facsimile the document(s) listed above to the
fax number(s) set forth below, on the date set forth above, before 5:00 p.m.
Clerk of the Court (via efiling)
COURT OF APPEAL
350 McAllister Street
San Francisco, California 94102
Christopher j. Hadsell (via email and first class mail)
9000 Crow Canyon Road, S-399
Danville, California 94506

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on November 23, 2016, at
Oakland, California.

~~\2_~~
Brenda K. Porto