Professional Documents
Culture Documents
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 9 September 2015
Accepted 23 February 2016
Available online 7 March 2016
Keywords:
Eco-design
Redesign
Steam turbine
Rotor blades
Life Cycle Assessment
Environmental analysis
a b s t r a c t
Eco-design of steam turbine blades could be one of the possibilities of decreasing the environmental
impact of energy systems based on turbines. The paper investigates the eco-design approach to elaboration of the rotor blades and packages. The purpose is to present the course of eco-design of the rotor
blades and the rotor packages taking account of eco-design assumptions, solutions and the concept itself.
The following eco-design variants of the rotor blades and the rotor packages are considered: elements of
the rotor blades made separately (baseline variant of the rotor blades); elements of the rotor blades made
of one piece of material; blades in packages made separately and welded (baseline variant of the rotor
packages); packages milled as integral elements. At the stage of detailed design, the Life Cycle
Assessment (LCA) is performed in relation to a functional unit the rotor blades and packages ready
for installation in a steam turbine, which is the stage of the turbine. The obtained results indicate that
eco-innovative solutions for the turbine blades and packages could be achieved through structural and
technological changes. Applying new solutions of the rotor blades may produce the following main benefits: 3.3% lower use of materials, 29.4% decrease in energy consumption at the manufacturing stage, 7.7%
decrease in the environmental impact in the life cycle. In relation to the rotor packages, the following
main benefits may be achieved: 20.5% lower use of materials, 25.0% decrease in energy consumption
at the production stage, 16.2% decrease in the environmental impact in the life cycle.
2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
1.1. Reasons for research and the solution novelty
Existing power plants are equipped with old, even 50-year-old
turbines, whose parts need to be repaired and/or replaced. The significance of the problem is illustrated by the quantitative scale
steam turbine plants remain the most common type of systems
used for combined production of electricity and heat [13], which
is often justified economically. It also has to be remembered that
steam turbines generally have a complex nature comprising multistage steam expansion to increase thermal efficiency [4].
This creates a potential for research aiming not only to achieve
higher efficiency but also to reduce the environmental impact of
energy generation systems [5,6]. In this context, this study fits in
sustainable power generation research related to analyses of
environmental aspects in numerous Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)
studies that have been conducted for electricity generation systems, e.g. [710].
Blades are critical components of steam turbines and they are
susceptible to failure due to stresses arising primarily from centrifugal loads and bending forces related to the steam mass flow
[11]. Moreover, corrosion, leading to crack initiation and propagation, is an important failure mechanism in blades [12]. This means
a need to replace them during repair or overhaul works and may
necessitate redesign of the elements.
According to Shimoyama et al. [13], in order to design a highly
efficient steam turbine, it is essential to consider many design
objective functions regarding the fluid dynamic performance
(energy loss reduction, smooth guidance of working steam, etc.)
simultaneously. In addition, the steam turbine has a number of
geometric and topological variables (blade shape, number of
blades, number of stages, etc.) that also have to be taken into
account at the design stage at the same time [13].
This set of variables is extended in the eco-design approach
aiming to find eco-innovative solutions due to the application of
eco-design rules. Such an approach concerns the production,
19
Nomenclature
AISI
CAD
CED
CNC
DALY
DUPLEX
cycle shows a new way of thinking that needs new tools and methods at each step of eco-design. In this context, a major challenge is
posed by the need to construct a structural framework that will be
used effectively in eco-design in a specific research area.
Moreover, in the selection of alternative design variants, environmental requirements should be considered as equal to other
criteria. The reason for that are the rising concerns over escalating
emissions, resource depletion and other environmental issues that
lead to an increased emphasis on the design and manufacture of
environmentally benign products [17,18].
As indicated by Stevels [19], there is disagreement between the
academic and practical approach to eco-design. A lot of eco-design
procedures and tools, in spite of their number and range of applications, are developed as theoretical methods not verified in industrial practice. Very often, due to their extreme complexity, lack of
knowledge and the fact that they are rather time-consuming, the
methods are not used by companies systematically [20].
Lofthouse [21] points to the role of industrial designers in
implementing eco-design assumptions because they have a real
influence on the product development in the early stages. That is
why their decisions are so significant. According to Lofthouse
[21], designers involved in eco-design look for information about
supporting the operational area of eco-design to help them to turn
ideas into reality.
Additionally, Vallet et al. [22] claim that environmental assessment, solution finding and strategy definition are the activities
which differentiate eco-design from design, and that environmental initial assessment and strategy definition are more heavily
influenced by eco-designers expertise than support from tools.
Confirmation of these claims can be found in the findings presented herein. The need to resolve the eco-design paradox is also
taken into account. According to the paradox, the chance of
improving a product in terms of its environmental impact
decreases as the eco-design process proceeds, i.e. the later the
analysis of environmental aspects is undertaken, the smaller the
chance to introduce essential changes in the environmental profile
[23].
The analysis presented in this paper takes account of the
aspects mentioned above. They are therefore the inspiration for a
systematic inclusion of environmental aspects in the steam turbine
blades design.
20
proposed in [28]. The activities related to individual stages are presented in Section 4.
3. Methodology
The research works were carried out according to the procedure
described in the introduction section, comprising subsequent
stages of developing new solutions and taking account of environmental criteria: planning of the eco-design process, searching for
eco-innovative solutions, development of the initial design, development of the detailed design.
The following tools assisting eco-design were used checklist
and LCA.
21
3.1. Checklist
At the stage of identification of eco-design variants and of the
variants preliminary analysis related to the eco-design concept
specification, a checklist was used, where the eco-design variants
were assessed with respect to criteria representing eco-design targets. The assessment was made using a five-point scale, where the
lowest and the highest marks mean the least and the most desired
results, respectively. The assessment has a qualitative nature and is
based on rating points derived from the designers experience.
3.2. LCA methodology
In relation to the use of the Life Cycle Assessment to estimate
the environmental impact of the eco-design solution, certain
assumptions are presented. The assessment is made using the
SimaPro Analyst 8.0.2 package, developed by PR Sustainability,
the Netherlands, with embedded databases.
The Life Cycle Assessment was carried out according to the recommendations specified in the PN-EN ISO 14040:2009 [33] and the
PN-EN ISO 14044:2009 [34] standards. The analysis was conducted
according to four standard steps: the goal and scope definition, Life
Cycle Inventory (LCI), Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA),
interpretation.
3.2.1. Goal of analysis
The Life Cycle Assessment goal is to determine the environmental impact of analyzed design variants of the rotor blades and the
rotor packages for their comparison.
The results of the analysis are used in eco-design of the rotor
blades and packages.
22
Normalization factor
Unit
Human health
Ecosystem quality
Climate change
Resources
0.0071
13,700
9950
152,000
DALY/point
PDF m2 y/point
kg CO2 into air/point
MJ/point
The characterization results at the midpoint level and normalized results at the damage level are presented. The midpoint categories considered in the study are as follows [36]:
Human toxicity that represents effects on human health carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic. As the reference substance is
chloroethylene the midpoint characterization factors are
expressed in kg of chloroethylene (kg C2H3Cl eq) emitted into
air.
Respiratory effects caused by inorganic substances expressed in
kg of PM2.5 eq.
Terrestrial ecotoxicity expressed in kg of triethylene glycol TEG
emitted into the soil.
Global warming expressed in kg of CO2 eq.
Non-renewable energy expressed in MJ of total primary nonrenewable energy per unit extracted (kg or m3) nonrenewable resources.
Mineral extraction expressed in MJ of surplus energy per kg of
extracted minerals.
In order to compare the characterization results obtained for
individual design variants, normalization is used in this work. It
is carried out in relation to the damage categories representing
all midpoint categories divided into four groups: human health,
23
Table 2
Eco-design stages.
Eco-design and development stage
Result
Eco-design
assumptions
Eco-design
concept
Eco-design
solution
Technology:
In defining the technological aspects taken into account in the
design process, the following processes are considered: milling,
welding, heat treatment, polishing, grinding and special processes (such as coating, edge hardening, stelliting, shot
peening).
Assembly in the turbine:
Selection of appropriate tolerances, assuming assembly allowances and a way of their removal are taken into account.
Environmental parameters:
A reduction in the environmental impact of the process of the
rotor blade and the rotor package production involves structural and technological aspects.
The search for solutions that may result in a decrease in the
environmental impact of blades depends primarily on whether
the conditions described above are met.
Material selection:
In the selection of materials, parameters such as mechanical
strength, heat resistance, impact strength, toughness, weldability and linear expansion are taken into account.
The main requirement for stainless steels is that they should be
corrosion-resistant for a specified application or environment.
The selection of a particular type and grade of stainless steel
must meet the corrosion-resistance requirements. Additional
mechanical or physical properties may also need to be considered to achieve the overall service performance requirements.
Table 3
Manufacturing processes of the baseline variants of the rotor blades and packages.
Rotor blades
Airfoil
Material preparation for milling on a CNC machine consisting in
bar cutting and milling for a specified dimension
Blade milling according to the model and technological and construction
documentation
Grinding of airfoils
Maintenance and packaging
Spacer
Material preparation for milling on a CNC machine consisting in
bar cutting and milling for a specified dimension
Spacer milling according to the model and technological and construction
documentation
Maintenance and packaging
Rotor packages
Material preparation for milling on a CNC machine consisting in bar
cutting and milling for a specified dimension
Blade milling according to the model and technological and construction
documentation
Grinding of airfoils
Additional processing, fitting and matching blades in preparation for welding
Welding including blade heating
Thermal treatment
Milling
Polishing
Maintenance and packaging
24
4.1.3. Elaboration of models of the rotor blade and the rotor package
Fulfilling the conditions discussed above determines the structural form of the solution that may be presented as the model of
the rotor blade B1 (Fig. 3) and the rotor package P1 (Fig. 4).
B1
B2
P1
P2
Table 4
Characteristics of the manufacturing operations and environmental inputs and outputs of the baseline variants of the rotor blades and the rotor packages.
Process
Description
Milling
Welding TIG
Thermal treatment
Polishing
Electricity consumption
25
Durability increase
Table 6
Eco-design targets, tasks and implications.
Eco-design targets
Eco-design tasks
Tasks implications
operations connected with them are essential. In this case, a quantitative analysis, for example the LCA, is desirable.
It should be noted that the increase in the use of recycled materials and the use of steel with the lowest environmental impact, as
well as the use of steel with a high end-of-life recycling rate are
targets that could be considered on condition that the needed data
and information are available through the supply chain. The data
can be searched for in the LCI databases but the lack of primary
data is the reason for the comparative analysis limitation in this
respect. In this study, the 100% end-of-life recycling rate is
assumed and the remaining issues, as not directly connected with
the enterprise activities, are not taken into account. A similar situation concerns the reduction in failures at the use phase, which is
the effect of, for example, a more reliable structure verified at the
use phase.
4.2.3. Definition of eco-design tasks and implications
Taking eco-design targets into account, eco-design tasks and
implications that determine the possibility of undertaking further
activities were specified (Table 6).
Eco-design tasks determination implies further steps consisting
in eco-design variants identification and their environmental analysis by means of the LCA. The eco-design variants will be elaborated taking technological and structural aspects into account.
4.2.4. Identification of eco-design variants and their preliminary
analysis
The previously defined baseline variants are the basis for the
comparison aiming to establish if the assumed effects are achieved.
Table 7
Eco-design variants of analyzed solutions.
Variants for rotor
blades
Variant B1
Variant B2
Variant P1
Variant P2
26
Table 8
Checklist for preliminary assessment of eco-design variants.
Criteria
Unit
B1
B2
P1
P2
kg
kW h
2
2
3
4
2
2
4
4
pers y
Units
B1
B2
P1
P2
Steel
Steel transport to the enterprise
Electrical energy
Thermal energy
Water
Coolant
Preservative agent
Steel waste
Cutters
Welding wire
Particulates (polishing)
Welding dust
CO
NOx
Iron
Manganese
Silicon dust
Argon
CO2
Oxygen
Cardboard
kg
km
kW h
GJ
m3
l
l
kg
kg
kg
kg
kg
kg
kg
kg
kg
kg
m3
kg
m3
kg
61
1000
698
0.3
0.17
3
0.18
45.75
0.008
0.48
0.15
59
1000
493
0.25
0.11
1.9
0.20
44.25
0.009
0.32
0.15
483.87
1000
484
0.21
0.20
3.48
0.24
392.66
0.0063
1.2
0.6496
0.1566
0.105
0.0043
0.08961
0.01877
0.0054
0.3
0.34
0.22
0.15
384.89
1000
363
0.19
0.18
6.96
0.24
294.06
0.01
0.6496
0.15
Assembly
Electrical energy
Dust
Steel waste
kW h
kg
kg
72
0.015
1
70
0.015
0.8
82
0.02
9.1
82
0.02
9.1
Disassembly
Electrical energy
Dust
Steel waste
kW h
kg
kg
50
0.001
14.25
50
0.001
13.95
73
0.001
81.4
73
0.001
81.4
27
AISI
Cumulative Energy
Demand CED (MJ/kg)
Carbon footprint
(kg CO2 eq/kg)
X12Cr13
X20Cr13
410
420
83.6
89.8
4.5
4.9
Table 11
Comparison of the LCIA (characterization, IMPACT 2002+) of eco-design variants of rotor blades and rotor packages (results related to 100 rotor blades and 60 rotor packages).
Carcinogens
Non-carcinogens
Respiratory
inorganics
kg PM2.5 eq
Terrestrial
ecotoxicity
kg TEG soil
Global
warming
kg CO2 eq
Non-renewable
energy
MJ primary
Mineral
extraction
MJ surplus
kg C2H3Cl eq
kg C2H3Cl eq
B1
Manufacturing
Assembly and disassembly
End of life
2.35
0.195
5.19
6.98
0.0457
7.11
0.903
0.0162
1.32
1.54 104
54.5
4.42 104
1.18 103
22.9
606
1.39 104
303
8.78 103
12.5
0.0543
1.56 103
B2
Manufacturing
Assembly and disassembly
End of life
1.91
0.189
5.02
6.02
0.0442
6.88
0.794
0.0157
1.28
1.47 104
52.7
4.28 104
1.04 103
22.1
586
1.22 104
293
8.49 103
11.7
0.0525
1.51 103
P1
Manufacturing
Assembly and disassembly
End of life
37.7
1.11
41.1
61.2
0.261
56.4
4.68
0.0924
10.5
1.04 105
311
3.51 105
5.59 103
130
4.81 103
6 104
1.72 103
6.96 104
79.9
0.309
1.23 104
P2
Manufacturing
Assembly and disassembly
End of life
34.6
1.11
32.7
53.8
0.261
44.9
4.19
0.0924
8.33
9.69 104
311
2.79 105
4.99 103
130
3.82 103
5.42 104
1.72 103
5.54 104
75.2
0.309
9.82 103
28
Fig. 5. Comparison of characterization results for the rotor blade variants B1 and B2 (SimaPro graphs using the IMPACT 2002+ method in relation to 100 rotor blades).
Fig. 6. Comparison of characterization results for the rotor package variants P1 and P2 (SimaPro graphs using the IMPACT 2002+ method in relation to 60 rotor packages).
Table 12
Verification of eco-design assumptions.
Eco-design targets
B2 in relation
to B1 (%)
P2 in relation
to P1 (%)
3.3
29.4
20.5
25.0
7.7
16.2
29
for packages (cf. Section 4.2.4). The goal was only achieved for
the rotor packages. Therefore, it is desirable that further efforts
should be made to reduce the consumption of materials in the case
of the rotor blades. Such efforts should be preceded by an analysis
of the potential in this area.
The selection of a specific technology milling the rotor blades
and packages on a CNC machine is also related to a decrease in
electricity consumption. In the case of the rotor blades, a decrease
was observed at the level of 29.4%, whereas for the rotor packages
the reduction in energy consumption was at the level of 25.0%.
This means that the assumed decrease in electricity consumption
at the level of 20% was achieved and even exceeded. The reduction
results from differences related to the element construction and
the way of treatment.
A reduction in the environmental impact in the life cycle was
achieved both for the rotor blades and packages. The change was
determined using normalized LCIA results. The total result concerning the environmental impact in the damage categories of
human health, ecosystem quality, climate change and resources
in the case of rotor blades is by 7.7% smaller for variant B2 compared to variant B1. A decrease in the impact was assumed at the
level of 10%, which means that for blades the value was not
achieved, although it is relatively close to the assumed value. In
the case of packages, the result is better by 6.2% in comparison
to the assumption.
4.5. Further steps
Taking account of the LCA results and the technical and economic conditions, the variants intended for implementation were
selected a blade with the spacer and the shroud integrated, and
a milled package.
Subsequently, the technology and guidelines for the manufacturing process were developed and the prototype was made and
tested to perform design validation.
Within the scope of production of the eco-innovative product,
the rotor blades and packages manufacturing process took place,
including quality control.
At the stage of launching the eco-innovative product into the
market, the product was distributed to customers using road
transport.
As a result of the undertaken steps, an eco-innovative product
was obtained, which is characterized by lower material consumption, lower energy consumption and a reduced environmental
impact during manufacture.
This approach may also be useful in B2B relationships. The
green attitude may be declared in contacts with customers of
blades and packages and it may also be used in perfecting the environment management system.
The essential part of the analysis of environmental aspects is
the Life Cycle Assessment. In the case under consideration, a decision based on the LCA results is made as to the selection of the
most favorable variants in terms of their environmental impact.
The LCA is here a bridge that connects all works devoted to the
evaluation of the environmental impact created by the power generation system life cycle. This concerns for example the studies
conducted by Strazza et al. [47], Kannan et al. [48], Ashley [49],
or Knight and Jenkins [50].
Additional benefits could be achieved due to the application of
the life cycle costing LCC [51].
Another stimulus and motivation for further studies in the field
of eco-design is the use of the CAD software containing an ecodesign module, e.g. the SolidWorks Sustainability, Autodesk, EcoDesigner (Siemens) or ecologiCAD software. This group of tools
also includes databases with data from the Life Cycle Inventory
(LCI) used for the purpose of the Life Cycle Assessment. Pahl
30
et al. [25] state that the most important impact in recent years on
the design process, and on the activities of designers, has come
from computer-based data processing. According to Pahl et al.
[25], computer-aided design (CAD) affects not only designing as
such, but also the organizational structure, the division of labour
and the creativity of individual designers. Moreover, employees
performing new functions (e.g. system managers, CAD specialists)
get involved in the design process. Consequently, many design
tasks are performed using CAD tools, which is also important in
the inclusion of environmental aspects in the design process.
5. Conclusions
This paper investigates eco-design inclusion in the search for
eco-innovative solutions to the rotor blades and the rotor packages
being parts of the steam turbine.
Eco-design is characterized by significant potential for ecoinnovation generation, which results from the use of a systematic
approach to finding new solutions, taking account of environmental aspects and of the possibility of including their environmental
evaluation into the procedure in the context of the life cycle. Such
a systematic approach was applied to eco-design of the rotor
blades and packages.
Based on a literature survey that highlighted the need to provide eco-design support to design teams and due to the methodological and procedural challenges, as well as owing to the wide
range of available tools, procedural aspects of eco-design based
on the phase-based model were described and applied.
Because environmental requirements should be considered as
equal to other criteria for the selection of alternative design variants, technical and environmental assumptions were made in the
first place. They cover basic technical requirements concerning
operating parameters, geometric and structural parameters, material selection, technology, assembly and environmental parameters.
The design concept was developed starting from determination
of eco-design approaches and eco-design ideas for the rotor blades
and packages. The preliminary analysis of eco-design ideas in relation to the eco-design objective made it possible to distinguish
areas for improvement, which are specified by formulating four
eco-design targets: achieving a 10% lower consumption of input
materials compared to blades made in the baseline version for
the rotor blades and a 20% reduction for the rotor packages; the
use of steel with a high recycling rate; a decrease in energy consumption at the production stage by about 20%; a decrease in the
environmental impact at the production stage by about 10%.
Taking the eco-design targets and tasks into account, the ecodesign implications determining the possibilities of further activities were specified and the eco-design variants for the rotor blades
and packages were determined: B1 elements of the rotor blades
made separately (baseline variant for the rotor blades); B2 elements of the rotor blades made of one piece of material; P1
blades in packages made separately and then welded (baseline
variant for the rotor packages); P2 packages milled as integral
elements. At the stage of detailed design, the Life Cycle Assessment
was performed in relation to a functional unit the rotor blades
and packages ready for installation in a steam turbine. The
obtained results indicate that eco-innovative solutions for the turbine blades could be found through structural and technological
changes.
It is concluded that the application of the new solution to the
rotor blades B2 may produce the following main benefits: a
3.3% lower consumption of materials, a 29.4% decrease in energy
consumption at the production stage, an 7.7% decrease in the environmental impact in the life cycle. In relation to the rotor packages,
the following benefits may be achieved using variant P2: a 20.5%
lower consumption of materials, a 25.0% decrease in energy consumption at the production stage, a 16.2% decrease in the environmental impact in the life cycle. The advantages are obtained due to
a change in the structure and the technology of production of
blades and packages.
The applied approach demonstrates implementation of ecodesign in the company practices that can be used in a systematic
way in future.
Acknowledgments
The research presented in this article was supported by grant
UMO-2011/01/D/HS4/03997 from the Polish National Science
Centre.
The author would like to thank Jerzy Jamontt, Chairman of the
Board of WIROMET S.A., for his support.
The author would like to thank the Reviewers for their very
helpful comments and suggestions.
References
[1] Energy statistics manual. Paris Cedex: International Energy Agency; 2004.
[2] Kehlhofer R, Hannemann F, Stirnimann F, Rukes B. Combined-cycle gas &
steam turbine power plants. 3rd ed. Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA: PennWell
Corporation; 2009.
[3] Rodrguez JA, Hamzaoui YEl, Hernndez JA, Garca JC, Flores JE, Tejeda AL. The
use of artificial neural network (ANN) for modeling the useful life of the failure
assessment in blades of steam turbines. Eng Fail Anal 2013;35:56275.
[4] Chaibakhsh A, Ghaffari A. Steam turbine model. Simul Model Pract Th
2008;16:114562.
[5] Baran J. Conditions of using steel products for the production of steam turbine
blades eco-design implications. In: METAL 2015. 24th international
conference on metallurgy and materials, Brno, Czech Republic, June 3rd5th,
2015. Conference proceedings. Ostrava: Tanger; 2015. p. 184752.
[6] Jiang XZ, Zheng D, Mi Y. Carbon footprint analysis of a combined cooling
heating and power system. Energy Convers Manage 2015;103:3642.
[7] Kannan R, Tso CP, Osman R, Ho HK. LCA-LCCA of oil fired steam turbine power
plant in Singapore. Energy Convers Manage 2004;45:3093107.
[8] Lombardi L. Life cycle assessment comparison of technical solutions for CO2
emissions reduction in power generation. Energy Convers Manage
2003;44:93108.
[9] Nitkiewicz A, Sekret R. Comparison of LCA results of low temperature heat
plant using electric heat pump, absorption heat pump and gas-fired boiler.
Energy Convers Manage 2014;87:64752.
[10] Santoyo-Castelazo E, Gujba H, Azapagic A. Life cycle assessment of electricity
generation in Mexico. Energy 2011;36:148899.
[11] Singh MP, Lucas GM. Blade design and analysis for steam turbines. New
York: The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc; 2011.
[12] Arteaga CC, Rodrguez JA, Clemente CM, Segura JA, Urquiza G. Estimation of
useful life turbines blades with cracks in corrosive environment. Eng Fail Anal
2013;35:57689.
[13] Shimoyama K, Yoshimzu S, Jeong S, Obayashi S, Yokono Y. Multi-objective
design optimization for a steam turbine stator blade using LES and GA. J
Comput Sci Technol 2011;5:13447.
[14] Kemp R, Pearson P. Final report MEI project about measuring eco-innovation.
Maastricht: MEI; 2008.
[15] Ryszko A. Proactive environmental strategy, technological eco-innovation and
firm performance case of Poland. Sustainability 2016;8(2):156.
[16] Kaebernick H, Kara S, Sun M. Sustainable product development and
manufacturing by considering environmental requirements. Robot Cim-Int
Manuf 2003;19:4618.
[17] Sutherland JW, Skerlos SJ, Olson WW, Gunter KL, Khadke K, Zimmerman J.
Environmentally benign manufacturing: status and vision for the future. In:
Proceedings of NAMRI/SME transactions, Dearborn MI; 2003. p. 34552.
[18] Wilson JM, Piya C, Shin YC, Zhao F, Ramani K. Remanufacturing of turbine
blades by laser direct deposition with its energy and environmental impact
analysis. J Clean Prod 2014;80:1708.
[19] Stevels A. Integration of eco-design into business. In: Hundal MS, editor.
Mechanical life cycle handbook. Good environmental design and
manufacturing. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc; 2002.
[20] Bovea MD, Prez-Belis V. A taxonomy of eco-design tools for integrating
environmental requirements into the product design process. J Clean Prod
2012;20:6171.
[21] Lofthouse V. Investigation into the role of core industrial designers in ecodesign projects. Des Stud 2004;25:21527.
[22] Vallet F, Eynard B, Millet D, Mahut SG, Tyl B, Bertoluci G. Using eco-design
tools: an overview of experts practices. Des Stud 2013;34:34577.
[23] Poudelet V, Chayer JA, Margni M, Pellerin R, Samson R. A process-based
approach to operationalize life cycle assessment through the development of
an eco-design decision-support system. J Clean Prod 2012;33:192201.
[38]
[39]
[40]
[41]
[42]
[43]
[44]
[45]
[46]
[47]
[48]
[49]
[50]
[51]
31