18 views

Uploaded by Tefera Temesgen

eee

- SNIST DOM PREVIOUS PAPER
- 400.pdf
- Madhu
- Final%252BReport-Harpoon%252BEngineering.pdf
- ASTM C305-99 STD
- The_Family_Handyman_September_2015_USA.pdf
- COM-BLD SSR24 Installation Manual
- Tension Members
- AISI 4340 (high Cr, 0
- 27.Sop Mudguard Rubbing
- Anchor Embeds
- CK-1 water valve modification1.pdf
- Connection Foot Bridge 44.5m Mail 1
- ES-MS-861_862
- 08_089_turvey_failure of Single-lap Single-bolt Tension Joints in Pultruded Glass Fibre Reinforce
- Pump House - New (05-05-2015)
- Fiberglass Soil Nails
- HOSHIZAKI KM-151BWH_parts_list
- SteelDesign Tension Fu
- Adirondack Chair Plans

You are on page 1of 12

Problem No. 1

Total points = 50

Determine the design tensile strength of the C10 x 25 channel section made from A36 steel. The

member end connection is made using bolts that are in. in diameter made from A325 steel. The

bolt connection layout is shown below.

(1) Determine the design tensile strength:

(45 pts)

(a) Consider only the limit states of gross yielding and net section fracture.

(b) For net section fracture, check all fracture paths (at least 3) you deem appropriate.

(c) Calculate U (shear lag factor) using the equation U=1-x/L0.9

(2) Answer the following questions qualitatively, i.e., without any calculations.

(5 pts)

(a) What will be the block shear failure path for the member?

(b) Can the block shear strength be computed using the standard AISC equations, or will

you need to modify them? If so, How?

Solution

(5) getting material properties right + (5) for gross yielding strength

Fy 36 ksi

Fu 58 ksi

db 0.75 in

Ag 7.34

in

tw 0.526

Part 1

Gross Yielding

Pny 0.9 Fy Ag

x 0.617

in

L 5.5

in

U 1

x

L

U 0.888

in

For each case: Assumption of correct path (2)

Calculation of correct net width = (5)

Calculation of correct fracture strength = (2)

3 2.5

Fracture Path

C10x25

3

2

An Ag 3 db

Pnf2 0.75 Fu Ae

2

2

3

3

tw

8

7

5

An 5.959 in

Ae U An

3 2.5

Fracture Path

C10x25

Ae 5.291

in

3 2.5

2

2

Af/2

Fracture Path

Aredg

C10x25

Af/2

Net Fracture Case 4

T 8 in

Aredg T tw

Aredg 4.208

Af Ag Aredg

Af 3.132

wn T 3 db

An Af wn tw

Pnf3 0.75 Fu Ae

( AISC)

g 3 in

in

in

4 g

wn 5.896

An 6.233 in

7

s 2.5 in

in

Ae U An

Ae 5.534

in

3 2.5

Af/2

Fracture Path

C10x25

Aredg

Af/2

Part 2

By examining the results in Part 1, the block shear failure path would be as follows:

2

2

3

3

3 2.5

Fracture Path

C10x25

In this case, no modifications to the AISC equation is required. However, if the results in Part 1

indicate that Path 2 governs, then the AISC equations would have to be modified as follows:

4 g

Agt tw 6 2

Ant Agt db

tw

s2

Where g is the vertical spacing.

Agt t w g

4g

Problem No. 2

Total points=50

(a)

Using the tension member design Tables in the AISC manual, select a double angle

tension member (with equal legs) to carry a factored design load of 150 kips.

(b)

Is the net section fracture strength noted in Table 3-7 correct? If not, then where does the

approximation appear in this Table?

(c)

Assuming in. diameter A325 bolts in shear/bearing for the connection system, how

many such bolts do you need for the connection?

(d)

Assuming Le=2 in., s=3.0 in., sketch a reasonable bolt layout, what is the actual net

section fracture design strength?

(e)

What is the block shear strength assuming that the shear fracture strength dominates, i.e.,

(f) Is the original selected member still valid? Do not re-design, just state what needs to be

changed to make it valid.

Solution

(4) points for selecting a reasonable section. No deduction for not picking the lightest section.

Just a warning. Sections in the neighborhood of the lightest section are OK.

(a) The most economical section from Table 3-7 is a 2L3 x 3 x 3/8 Py = 150 k, Pn = 151 k

(4) points for this

(b) When Ae < 0.75 Ag, tabulated values of design tension rupture cannot be used. Tables assume

Ae = 0.75 Ag

(12 points) for this calculation (4 for bearing and 8 for bolt shear strength)

(c) For bearing strength, assuming Le Lefull and s sfull Rn = 78.3 kips/in (Table 7-12)

Rn = 78.3 kips/in

Rn 78.3 t 2 Rn 58.725

kips of 1 bolt

Pu

Rn

n 2.554

bolts

n 5 bolts

Make

Rn 58.725 n

Bearing

Shear

31.8

n

Rn

78.3Rn Rn

78.3

Rn 78.3 t

Rn 293.625

kips

Rn 159

in

Rn 29.362

Pu

Rn

n 4.717

bolts

kips

kips

kips of 1 bolt

Pu

Rn

n 5.109

bolts

KK: The bearing strength will be 78.3 x t x 2 = 58.6 kips because there are two angles, and each

shares half the load. If they dont do this step and use the shear strength of the bolt directly,

deduct only a few points (max. 5).

Shear Strength 1 bolt: Rn 31.8 kips (Table 7-10)

n 6 bolts

Make

Bearing

Rn 29.362 6

Rn 176.172

kips

Shear

Rn 31.8 6

Rn 190.8

kips

Pu

Rn

n 4.717

bolts

(10) points for this calculation (net area calculation =3, U calculation =4, strength calc. = 3)

(d) Bolt layout shown below. Path shown for block shear in Part (e).

32

Ag 2.32

in

An Ag

x 0.823

An 1.992 in

L 15 in

in

Ae An U

Ae 3.585

U 1

Pn 0.75 Fu Ae

in

2 Angles

An 2 An

U 0.945

U 0.9

x

L

Pn 155.964 kips

Path = 3, Anv=5, Agt=2, Ant=5, Final strength = 3

(e) Path shown above in (d).

1 3

Anv t 14 4.5

8 4

Anv 3.773

in

Agt t 2

Agt 0.75

in

Ant 0.586

in

1 3

Ant t 2 0.5

8 4

Fy Agt 27

Fu Ant 33.984

kips

2 Angles

Rn 118.737

kips

2 Rn 237.473 kips

Anv t 17 5.5

1

8

Agt t 2

1 3

Ant t 2 0.5

8 4

Fy Agt 27

kips

Fu Ant 33.984

2 Angles

kips

2 Rn 279.07

Anv 4.57

in

Agt 0.75

in

Ant 0.586

in

kips

Rn 139.535

kips

kips

(f) Section is adequate.

An 3.984 in

Problem No. 3

(Total points=50)

Design the welded connection (only) for the member shown below. The given loads are service

loads. Assume Fy=50 ksi for the angle tension member, and Fy=36 ksi for the gusset plate. Show

the connection design on a sketch complete with all dimensions.

Note: You will have to consider both (angle and gusset) base metal strengths to compare with the

fillet weld strength.

Solution

Calculation of factored load = 2 points

Amin = 4 points

A max = 4 points

Selecting correct a = 2 points

Lmin= 4 points

Lmax=4 points

Implementing Lmax=2 points

Weld metal strength = 8 points

Base metal strength = 6 + 6 points

Required weld length = 3 points

Figure showing detail layout = 5 points

Fya 50 ksi

Fyg 36 ksi

Pu 1.2 D 1.6 L

tmin

5

16

in

D 45 kips

Pu 271.6

tmax

3

8

in

L 136

kips

ta

5

16

in

tg

kips

amax tmin

1

16

amax 0.25

in

3

Table J2.4 Make

in

a 0.25 in

Fexx 70 ksi

16

Strength Weld Metal Rn ( Lw) 0.75 0.6 Fexx 0.707 a Lw 5.56762500 Lw

amin

Base Strenght Angle

Lw

271.6

5.56762500

Lwmin 4 a 1.00

Lw 48.782

in

in

in

weld can't be greater than 25 in.

22 in.

5 in.

22 in.

3

8

in

25 in.

0.5 in.

0.5 in.

25 in.

0.25 in.

0.25 in.

25 in.

25 in.

10

Problem No. 4.

Total points = 50

Design a bolted splice connection for a single angle tension member. The service loads acting on

the member are 50 kips dead load + 30 kips live load.

The splice must be slip-critical for service loads, and have adequate shear/bearing strength for

factored loads. Assume 7/8 in. diameter A325 bolts.

(1) Design and check the splice to be slip-critical at service loads

(2) Design and check the shear/bearing strength of splice at ultimate loads.

(3) Design the thickness and width of the gusset plate

(4) Provide a sketch of the splice detail.

There is no need to check the design strength of the angle at ultimate loads. Assume that the

angle design works.

Solution

D 50 kips

L 30 kips

db

7

8

in

t 0.5 in

Part 1

SL D L 80

kips

Rn 10.2

Rn 10.2 n

kips

Rn 81.6

kips

11

Use 8 bolts

n 8

(18 points for shear bearing design) 8 for shear, and 10 for bearing.

Part 2

Pu 1.2 D 1.6 L

Pu 108

Rn 21.6 n

kips

Rn 172.8 kips ok

Bearing

Lemin 1.125 Table J3.4

Make Le 1.25 in

smin 2.6667 db

smin 2.333 in

spref 3 db

spref 2.625 in

For Edge:

Rn 40.8 t

Rn 20.4

Rn 91.3 t

s 3 in

Use

kips

Rn 45.65 kips

Note Assume Gusset Plate has same thickness

(15 points for gusset plate design) 5 points for getting 0.85 factor

Part 3

Make U=0.85

Ag

Pu

Ag 3.333 in

0.9 36

width

Ag

width 6.667

0.5

Ag b 0.5

Ag 3.5

in

Gross Yielding

Py Ag 0.9 36

Net Fracture

b 7

in

in

An Ag db

Make

0.5

Pn 0.75 U An 58

Py 113.4

kips

Pn 110.925 kips

Part 4

1.25

3 3 3

3 3

1.25

12

- SNIST DOM PREVIOUS PAPERUploaded byKapil Siddhant Devulapalli
- 400.pdfUploaded byStoyan Ivanov
- MadhuUploaded byShashidhar Hr
- Final%252BReport-Harpoon%252BEngineering.pdfUploaded byPaulStewart
- ASTM C305-99 STDUploaded byBarak Hussain
- The_Family_Handyman_September_2015_USA.pdfUploaded byLeonel Casanga Saldías
- COM-BLD SSR24 Installation ManualUploaded byAelfwine Einshpied
- Tension MembersUploaded byVictor Carhuayo Paredes
- AISI 4340 (high Cr, 0Uploaded byhunter8080
- 27.Sop Mudguard RubbingUploaded byAnonymous O9TX7Yl
- Anchor EmbedsUploaded byBilly Bob
- CK-1 water valve modification1.pdfUploaded bybetsabe12366
- Connection Foot Bridge 44.5m Mail 1Uploaded byEr Navneet Jassi
- ES-MS-861_862Uploaded byVinod Varadan S
- 08_089_turvey_failure of Single-lap Single-bolt Tension Joints in Pultruded Glass Fibre ReinforceUploaded bybadboys123
- Pump House - New (05-05-2015)Uploaded byJennifer Hudson
- Fiberglass Soil NailsUploaded byPrakash
- HOSHIZAKI KM-151BWH_parts_listUploaded byRomanko
- SteelDesign Tension FuUploaded byArman Malekloo
- Adirondack Chair PlansUploaded byjm50963
- Disc Type Pipe Cleaning Tool Easy Clean Flyer ROSENUploaded byadvisoraffairs
- JUK_APW-194Uploaded byRHoska
- Projector BracketUploaded bySohail Khan
- Hilti Profis Anchor 2 User Guide (US)Uploaded byChris Evans
- SS Tubing Pressure Ratings SANITARYUploaded byJorge Sandoval
- BearingUploaded byAniket Sankpal
- ECAS Catalog FinalUploaded byShant Meguerdichian
- Design of Waffle SlabUploaded byAriel Mayer
- Ry 30160Uploaded byIonescu Tiberiu
- 78 - 4 - Worm GearUploaded byrip111176

- col1.xlsUploaded byTefera Temesgen
- chap4..Geometric Design of Highway.pdfUploaded byTadi Fresco Royce
- bio11[1].pdfUploaded byTefera Temesgen
- Density.docxUploaded byTefera Temesgen
- m6l16Uploaded byjritesh3736
- rUploaded byTefera Temesgen
- projctUploaded byTefera Temesgen
- Beam MomentUploaded byTefera Temesgen
- For Mezanee Floor Panel PUploaded byTefera Temesgen
- Beamttt DesignUploaded byTefera Temesgen
- 4th quarter year.xlsxUploaded byTefera Temesgen
- ground ADDITIONAL PANEL layout-Model.pdfUploaded byTefera Temesgen
- Doc1Uploaded byTefera Temesgen
- Base Shear CalculationUploaded byTefera Temesgen
- Ground ADDITIONAL PANEL Layout-ModelUploaded byTefera Temesgen
- Chapter 1 – Yield Line Analysis For SlabsUploaded byTefera Temesgen
- rebar Unit RateUploaded byTefera Temesgen
- Quantity and SpescificationUploaded byTefera Temesgen
- XxxxxxxUploaded byTefera Temesgen
- Bar ScheduleUploaded byTefera Temesgen
- edited unit rate.xlsUploaded byTefera Temesgen
- Untitled 1Uploaded byTefera Temesgen
- Chapter 16_Structural Design.pdfUploaded byTefera Temesgen
- CoverUploaded byTefera Temesgen
- CoverUploaded byTefera Temesgen
- Untitled 1Uploaded byTefera Temesgen
- AmharicUploaded byTefera Temesgen
- JointUploaded byTefera Temesgen
- New Building Height Regulation ManualUploaded byTefera Temesgen
- 2008-02-12_Attachment2_HCB_testUploaded byTefera Temesgen

- Fracture MechanicsUploaded byzeeshan
- Technical Handbook Bonded AnchorsUploaded bydtweety
- Cs 002 148 Calc.Uploaded byAndiWSutomo
- 2009-Loading Histories for Cyclic Tests in Support of Performance Assessment of Structural Components_KrawinklerUploaded byCollin Turbert
- 05. Material Properties of Metals (Lectured)Uploaded byJiann Hau
- Seal Assemblies (Locator, Anchor, Latch)Uploaded byYougchu Luan
- Cyprus National Annex en 1993-1-1Uploaded byruov
- Caco3 MortarsUploaded byAngelCuevas
- Celulosa Nanofibrilada Como Refuerzo Potencial de FibrocementoUploaded bySebastian Nawrath
- Electro FormingUploaded byUdaya RangaNaik
- An Introduction to Failure Analysis for Metallurgical EngineersUploaded bykhin_aungshwe
- Polar Moment of Weld GroupUploaded byTrinh Duy Khanh
- Soil Improvement by BiocementationUploaded byjavierloayza
- R.1.1.3.2Uploaded bymaxlenti
- psg collegeUploaded bychandhan reddy
- FoundationCode2004.pdfUploaded bycu1988
- cycle 2 som labUploaded byAnonymous SEDun6PW
- TSN StiffClip CLUploaded byJC Jacobs
- Stone Column Supported Embankments (Fabian Kirsch, 2003)Uploaded bypaduco
- Introduction to Rock MechanicsUploaded byChristian Ed Uytico
- Physics.for.You 2016 12Uploaded byoctombrie-1
- asset-v1-CornellX+ENGR2000X+2T2016+type@asset+block@F-1_Engine__model_calculations__Non-Proprietyary_Non-ITAR_Rev2Uploaded byAxel Dominique
- Machine designUploaded byAkashdeep Srivastava
- ASTM D 4313 - 03Uploaded byo_l_0
- Zglobne glaveUploaded byNikolat84
- Considering Accidental EccentricityUploaded byDemçe Florjan
- 2009-TPC-333Uploaded byRamona Le
- Gravity Dam DesignUploaded bygigiosss
- 1.Introduction(Tan K H, NUS)Uploaded bynsureshbabu
- Extract From Steel Designers HandbookUploaded bymohanuma