Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Connection Design
Presentation Outline
Structural Steel Design
Limit State Weld Analysis
Strut Tie Analysis for Concrete
Corbels
Anchor Bolts
Connection Examples
Changes
New method to design headed studs (Headed Concrete
Anchors - HCA)
Revised welding section
Stainless Materials
Limit State procedure presented
Built-up Members
Torsional Strength
Beam Seats
fMp = fFyZs
Where:
fMp =
Fy =
Zs =
fVn = f(0.6Fy)Aw
Where:
fVp = Shear Design Strength
Aw = Area subject to shear
fTn = f(0.6Fy)aht2
Where:
fTp =
a =
h =
t =
Torsional Properties
Torsional Constant, a
Rectangular Sections
fTn = 2f(0.6Fy)t
Where:
fTp = Torsional Design Strength
= Area enclosed by centerline of walls
t = Wall thickness
Torsional Properties
Hollow Sections
= wd
P Mc M
fn ,
,
A I S
bending
torsion
VQ V
,
It A
Tc T
T
,
,
2
J aht 2At
Combined Loading
Stresses are added based on direction
Stress Limits based on Mohrs circle analysis
Normal Stress Limits
ffun f fy
f 0.90
f 0.90
Example
TC 0
A tF y A cFy 0
At Ac
Tension Area
Compression Area
A t 4in y
A c 2 3 in 1in 3 in y 4in
8
8
A c 2.25 4 y
4 y 2.25 4 y
Tension = Compression
2.25
0.281 in
8
Zp A t H y t y c
y 0.281
yt
0.14 in
2
2
Compression
yc
__
Ay
0.683 in
Calculate Zp
Z 4 y H y y
4 0.2811.375 0.14 0.683
Zp A t H y t y c
Zp
Zp 0.62 in3
Beam Seats
Stiffened Bearing
Triangular
Non-Triangular
Triangular Stiffeners
Design Strength
fVn=fFyzbt
Where:
fVn = Stiffener design
strength
f = Strength reduction
factor = 0.9
b = Stiffener projection
t
= Stiffener thickness
z = Stiffener shape factor
b
0.75
2.0
a
2
b
b
b
z 1.39 2.2 1.27 0.25
a
a
a
Thickness Limitation
b 250
t
Fy
Problem:
Determine the design shear
resistance of the stiffener.
Shape Factor
b
8
b
b
b
z 1.39 2.2 1.27 0.25
a
a
a
0.25 0.8
Thickness Limitation
b 250
t
Fy
8
21.3
0.375
250
36
21.3 41.7
41.7
Design Strength
fVn f Fy z b t
Weld Analysis
Elastic Procedure
Limit State (LRFD) Design
introduced
Comparison of in-plane C shape
Elastic Vector Method - EVM
Instantaneous Center Method ICM
fx
fy
fz
fr
Px
Aw
Py
Aw
Pz
Aw
Mz y
Mz x
Mx y
Ip
Ip
I xx
My x
I yy
fx 2 fy 2 fz 2
Aw
lw
2
Where:
a = Weld Size
lw = Total length of weld
Rn
j
f g h
Strength, f
f 0.6 FEXX A w
Aw - Weld area based on effective throat
Angular Orientation, g
Weld capacity increases as the angle of the force
and weld axis approach 90o
Rj R g
Deformation Compatibility, h
r
u
u
rcritical
rcritical
1.9 0.9
h
0.32
0.32
0.209 2
a
0.209 2
a
0.3
u 1.087 6
0.64
a 0.17a
Element Force
R n 0.6FEXX A w
j
0.3
r
r
rcritical
rcritical
1.9 0.9
0.32
0.32
0.209 2
a
0.209 2
a
Equations of Statics
F
IC
Number of
Elements
R n Pn 0
yj
j1
Number of
Elements
j1
R n rj Pn e r0 0
j
Tabulated Solution
AISC LRFD 3rd Edition, Tables 8-5 to 8-12
fVn = CC1 Dl
Where:
D =
C =
C1 =
l =
Comparison of Methods
Page 6-47:
Corbel Design
Cantilever Beam Method
Strut Tie Design Method
Design comparison
Results comparison of Cantilever
Method to Strut Tie Method
1 2Vu
Eq. B A s
Nu
ffy 3 e
1
As
ffy
A h 0.5 A s A n
Steel distribution is
within 2/3 of d
Vu
f 0.85 f`c
f 0.75
Fnt
ffy
f 0.75
fFns = ffcuAc
where:
f = 0.75
Ac = width of corbel
width of strut
Corbel Example
Given:
Vu = 80 kips
Nu = 15 kips
fy = Grade 60
fc = 5000 psi
Bearing area 12 x 6 in.
Problem:
Find corbel depth and reinforcement based on Cantilever
Beam and Strut Tie methods
h = 14 in
d = 13 in.
a = lp = 6 in.
From Table 4.3.6.1
2
Vumax 1000 l A
cr
1000 12 14 14
1000
Cantilever Action
1
As
ffy
a
h
1
Vu Nu
d .75 60
d
1.18 in2
6
14
80 15
13
13
Vu
80
3.43 3.4
Use e 3.4
Shear Friction
1 2Vu
1
As
u
ffy 3 e
0.75 60
0.68 in2
2 80
15
3 3.4
A s,min
f`c
5
0.4 b d
0.4 14 13
ffy
60
0.61 in2
15
0.75 60
0.42 in
A bearing
Vu
f 0.85f`c
80
0.75 0.85f`c
25.1 in2
Use 12 by 6 in. plate, area = 72 in2 > 25.1 in2
Mm = 0
Vul1+Nud Ncl2=0 [Eq. 1]
Strut op
Tie no
Strut np
Tie mp
Tie mn
=
=
=
=
=
As
Fnt
ffy
62
0.75 60
1.52in2
Provide 2 #8 = 1.58 in2 at the top
Width of strut np
Strut Width
ws
o
sin(54.4 )
6.03 in
4.9
sin(54.4 o )
OK
Example Conclusion
Strut-and-Tie Method
Concrete Capacity
Vc
0.85 f`c b l e
1 3.6e
le
Vr
6e
1
le
4.8s
le
Corbel Capacity
Reinforced Concrete
fVn f Vc VR
f 0.75
fVn
a
0.5 Vu
0.85 f`c b
Where:
b = effective width on embed, 250 % x Actual
f = 0.9
Shear
fVs f 0.6fy h t
where:
h, t = depth and thickness of steel web
f = 0.9
f 'c
3
hef
Wall Tension
Diaphragm to Wall Shear
Questions?