Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Thrombosis Research
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/thromres
Regular Article
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 13 December 2013
Received in revised form 9 July 2014
Accepted 31 July 2014
Available online 9 August 2014
Keywords:
D-dimer
Factor V Leiden
Pregnancy
Prothrombin fragments 1 + 2
Soluble brin
a b s t r a c t
Background: The risk of venous thromboembolism is enhanced in pregnant carriers of the Factor V Leiden mutation. The primary aim of the study was to compare prothrombin fragments 1 + 2, soluble brin and D-dimer
levels in pregnant Factor V Leiden mutation carriers with those in non-carriers. Secondary aims were to evaluate
whether these biomarkers could predict placenta-mediated complications or venous thromboembolism, and to
study blood coagulation after caesarean section with thromboprophylaxis and after vaginal delivery without
thromboprophylaxis.
Material/Methods: Prothrombin fragments 1 + 2, soluble brin and D-dimer levels were studied longitudinally in
476 carriers with singleton pregnancies from gestational weeks 2325 until 810 weeks postpartum.
Results: Prothrombin fragments 1 + 2 and D-dimer levels gradually increased during pregnancy. D-dimer levels
were higher in carriers, both during pregnancy and puerperium, compared to non-carriers. D-dimer levels above
0.5 mg/l were found in about 30% and 20% of the heterozygous carriers at 45 and 810 weeks postpartum,
respectively. Soluble brin levels were mainly unchanged during pregnancy, with no difference between carriers
and non-carriers. Biomarker levels were similar in carriers with uncomplicated and complicated pregnancies.
Conclusion: Higher D-dimer levels indicate increased blood coagulation and brinolysis activity in carriers. The
high proportion of carriers with D-dimer levels exceeding 0.5 mg/l postpartum must be considered when
assessing the probability of venous thromboembolism. Large overlaps in biomarker levels in normal and complicated pregnancies suggest that these biomarkers cannot be used as predictors. Thromboprophylaxis following
caesarean section may prevent increased activation of blood coagulation.
2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Introduction
During pregnancy and postpartum, the haemostatic system changes
into a state of hypercoagulability. The brinolytic system remains active
and compensates for increased brin formation, although plasminogen
Abbreviations: APC, activated protein C; c.s, caesarean section; CV, coefcient of variation; DIC, disseminated intravascular coagulation; DVT, deep vein thrombosis; ELISA,
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; FVL, Factor V Leiden; F1 + 2, prothrombin fragments 1 + 2; IUFD, intrauterine fetal death; LMHW, low molecular weight heparin; r,
Pearsons correlation coefcient; SD, standard deviation; SGA, small for gestational age;
SF, soluble brin; VTE, venous thromboembolism.
Authors contributions: All authors researched the literature, planned the study, developed the protocol and recruited participants. MH and UK applied for ethical approval.
UK undertook the data analysis and wrote the rst draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed to data analysis, reviewed and edited the manuscript and approved the nal
version.
Corresponding author at: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, SU/stra, S-416
85 Gteborg, Sweden. Tel.: +46 31 3434129.
E-mail address: ulla.kjellberg@hotmail.se (U. Kjellberg).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2014.07.037
0049-3848/ 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
838
Study group
6000 pregnant women
458 heterozygous
11 homozygous
6 heterozygous F VL combined
with heterzygous F II mutation
1 pseudo-homozygous carrier
50 complicated
pregnancies
18 normal pregnancies
Fig. 1. Flow chart of Factor V Leiden carriers. FVL: Factor V Leiden, FII: Factor II.
Supercial thrombophlebitis: diagnosed clinically, i.e. palpable, tender vein, accompanied by a surrounding area of localized inammation. If the thrombophlebitis was located near a perforating vein,
DVT was ruled out by triplex ultrasonography.
Blood loss: routinely estimated and recorded by the midwife at
delivery.
839
Laboratory Methods
Results
APC resistance was analysed with COATEST APC Resistance V,
Chromogenix AB, Mlndal, Sweden. The FVL and prothrombin gene
mutations were diagnosed by polymerase chain reaction technique
[14,15]. F1 + 2 was analysed with a quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay technique (ELISA) (Enzygnost F1 + 2 micro, Dade
Behring, Marburg, Germany). SF was analysed with a latex
immunoturbidometric assay (LPIA-Iatro, Mitsubishi Kagaku Iatron Inc,
Japan) [16]. D-dimer ELISA was analysed with an immunologic technique (Asserachrome D-Di/ Diagnostica Stago, France).D-dimer
Latex was analysed with a latex agglutination assay (STA-Liatest DDI, Diagnostica Stago, France).
According to the participating laboratories, the inter-assay coefcients of variation (CV) were: APC resistance test: 4% at APC ratio 2.4;
F1 + 2 test: 20% at 0.13-0.29 nmol/l and 15% at 117 nmol/l; SF-test:
10% at 10 mg/l and 6% at 35 mg/l; D-dimer ELISA test: 10% at 0.081.0 mg/l; D-dimer Latex test: 20% at 0.5 mg/l and 10% at 2.0 mg/l.
All analyses were performed in series. If absorbance was above the
top standard, the sample was re-tested after dilution so that the results
were read on the linear part of the calibration curve.
Lupus anticoagulants was analysed with the Dilute Russel Viper
Venom Time test, according to routine.
F1 + 2, D-dimer ELISA and D-dimer Latex were analysed at the
Department of Clinical Chemistry, Sahlgrenska University Hospital,
Gothenburg, and SF was analysed at the Department of Clinical Chemistry, Malm University Hospital, Malm. Both laboratories are accredited
(ISO 15189).
Controls for F1 + 2 consisted of 42 randomly selected healthy noncarriers with normal pregnancies, followed longitudinally, as previously
reported [3].
Controls for SF and D-dimer Latex consisted of another randomly
selected 43 healthy non-carriers with normal pregnancies, followed
longitudinally. These latter controls are those remaining after exclusion
of women with APC resistance from a previous study [17].
The number of women studied with regard to SF and D-dimer Latex
had to be limited for economic reasons. Thus, 52 of the healthy heterozygous FVL carriers with normal pregnancies were matched for age,
parity and body mass index with FVL carriers with placenta-mediated
complications, VTE, supercial thrombophlebitits, homozygosity for
FVL or heterozygosity for FVL with additional thrombophilia, in order
to obtain a smaller but representative group for comparison.
Statistics
All variables showed a positive skewed distribution and the statistical analyses were thus performed on data transformed by Bloms transformation method. For analyses within carriers, change over time was
examined by mixed model repeated measures analysis with timepoint specied as xed effect. The Toeplitz covariance structure proved
(tested by likelihood ratio test) to be the most appropriate for this analysis. For comparisons between carriers and non-carriers, mixed model
repeated measures analysis was used, specifying FVL status, timepoint and interaction between FVL status and time-point as xed
effects. The Toeplitz covariance structure, allowing for heterogeneity
between groups, proved to be the most appropriate for this analysis.
By default, this method adjusts p-values and condence limits for all
pairwise differences. For graphical purposes, log2 of F1 + 2 and log10
Table 1
Placenta-mediated complications, gestational hypertension, venous thromboembolism
and supercial thrombophlebitis in carriers of the Factor V Leiden mutation.
Complications (n = 50)
Placental abruption
Placental abruption + SGA
SGA
SGA and supercial thrombophlebitis
Severe preeclampsia
Severe preeclampsia + SGA
Mild preeclampsia
Lupus anticoagulants + pulmonary
embolism + IUFD + severe
preeclampsia
Deep vein thrombosis
Pulmonary embolism
Supercial thrombophlebitis
Gestational hypertension
Heterozygous
FVL carriers
(n = 458)
Homozygous FVLcarriersa
(n = 12) or heterozygous
FVL carriers with
heterozygous FII
mutation (n = 6)
2
1
6
1
6
3
6
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
5
16
0
0
0
0
n, number; SGA, small for gestational age; IUFD, intrauterine fetal death; FVL, Factor V Leiden; FII, Factor II.
a
including one woman with pseudohomozygous APC resistance.
a
A smaller group of the heterozygous FVL carriers with normal pregnancies matched for age, parity and BMI with heterozygous carriers with placenta-mediated complications, venous thromboembolism, supercial thrombophlebitis, homozygosity
or heterozygosity with additional thrombophilia for comparisons of soluble brin and D-dimer Latex. bone women had more than one complication. creference [3]. dreference [17]. FVL, Factor V Leiden; VTE, venous thromboembolism; F1 + 2, prothrombin fragment 1 + 2; BMI, body mass index.
See separate le.
29.8(5.4)
23-40
24
18
22.8(3.6)
19.0-32.4
31(3.4)
24-36
8
8
27(6.2)
20-41
30.7(4.1)
20-44
260
148
23.6(3.8)
16.2-44.8
Age years
(SD) range
Nulliparous, n
Parous, n
BMI (SD)
range
30.4(4.5)
19-41
40
12
25.1(4.5)
20-39
30(4.2)
21-41
28
6
26(4.9)
19-39
31(5.6)
19-39
12
6
24(3.6)
20-31
Non-carrier controls
for F1 + 2 c
n = 42
Homozygous FVL carriers (n = 11)
Double mutation FVL and Factor II (n = 6)
Pseudohomozygous FVL (n = 1)
with normal pregnancy
n = 18
Heterozygous FVL carriers
with gestational hypertension
n = 16
Heterozygous FVL carriers with
placenta-mediated complications
(n = 26) or VTE (n = 4) or supercial
thrombophlebitis(n = 5)
n = 34b
Matcheda heterozygous
FVL carriers with normal
pregnancy
n = 52
Heterozygous FVL
carriers with normal
pregnancy
n = 408
Demography
Table 2
Demography. Age, parity and body mass index.
30.0(4.2)
21-40
23
20
24.1(4.0)
17.9-32.4
840
from those not treated with anticoagulants or those who bled less
than 1000 ml (data not shown). Biomarker levels in women who
contracted gestational hypertension, which has not proven to be
placentally mediated, or supercial thrombophlebitis were in the
same intervals as the corresponding levels in carriers with normal
pregnancies (data not shown).
Heterozygous FVL Carriers with Normal Pregnancies
Fl + 2 levels in heterozygous carriers increased signicantly and
gradually during pregnancy (Table 3) but were not higher at one day
postpartum than during the late third trimester. F1 + 2 levels in carriers
did not differ from those in non-carriers in the second and early third
trimester. Non-carriers had higher levels of F1 + 2 in the late third trimester, compared to carriers, who had higher levels than non-carriers
at eight weeks postpartum (Table 3).
The levels of SF in carriers were the same during pregnancy, at
45 weeks and at 810 weeks postpartum (Table 3) but higher at one
day postpartum than in the late third trimester. Carriers had higher
levels in the second trimester but not in the third trimester or at
810 weeks postpartum (Table 3).
D-dimer ELISA and D-dimer Latex levels in carriers increased gradually during pregnancy and were higher at one day postpartum than in
the late third trimester (Table 3). The D-dimer ELISA exceeded
0.5 mg/l in 31% and 15% of the heterozygous carriers at 45 and
810 weeks postpartum, respectively. D-dimer Latex levels were higher
in carriers during both pregnancy and puerperium (Table 3). D-dimer
Latex levels exceeded 0.5 mg/l in 36% and 23% of the carriers at 45
and 810 weeks postpartum, respectively. D-dimer Latex levels
exceeded 0.5 mg/l in 11% of the non-carriers at eight weeks postpartum
[17]. This difference between carriers and non-carriers at eight weeks
postpartum was not statistically signicant.
The correlation between D-dimer Latex and D-dimer ELISA was high
throughout pregnancy and at one day postpartum (r = 0.89 (0.810.94), 0.90 (0.81-0.94), 0.95 (0.90-0.97)) and 0.94 (0.90-0.97),
respectively), but low at 45 and 810 weeks postpartum (r = 0.72
(0.5-0.9) and 0.40 (0.1-0.6), respectively). There was a weak correlation
between F1 + 2 and SF levels during the second and early third trimester (r b 0.5) but no correlation during the late third trimester and
postpartum. The correlations between SF and D-dimer ELISA were
high during pregnancy and at one day postpartum, (r = 0.70 (0.540.81), 0.71 (0.55-0.81), 0.61(0.39-0.76), 0.75 (0.58-0.86)) but not significant at 45 and 810 weeks postpartum.
Heterozygous FVL Carriers Contracting Placenta-mediated Complications
or VTE
Only heterozygous FVL carriers contracted any placenta-mediated
complications or VTE. The levels of the biomarkers during pregnancy
and at eight weeks postpartum in these women did not differ from
those in heterozygous carriers with normal pregnancies (Fig. 2).
Heterozygous FVL Carriers Delivered by Caesarean Section
F1 + 2, SF and D-dimer Latex levels were the same in heterozygous
FVL carriers delivered with c.s. and given thromboprophylaxis as in
those vaginally delivered and not given thromboprophylaxis (Table 4).
D-dimer ELISA levels were higher in the women delivered with c.s.
than in those vaginally delivered at 45 weeks postpartum, but not at
one day or 810 weeks postpartum (Table 4).
Homozygous FVL Carriers and Women with Additional Thrombophilia
All pregnancies were normal. F1 + 2 and D-dimer ELISA levels were
signicantly higher in FVL-homozygous women and in women with
Table 3
Prothrombin fragments 1 + 2, soluble brin, D-dimer ELISA and D-dimer Latex in heterozygous Factor V Leiden carriers and in non-carriers during normal pregnancy and postpartum.
F1 + 2 nmol/l
Matched heterozygous
FVL carriers with normal
pregnancies
p-valuea
Mean (SD)
Median
(Min - Max)
n
p-valueb
Mean (SD)
Median
(Min - Max)
n
1.6 (0.6)
1.6 (0.9 - 4.0)
n = 41
2.6 (0.8)
2.4 (0.9 - 5.1)
n = 40
3.2 (1.3)
2.7 (1.2 - 6.4)
n = 37
0.16
19.3 (33.1)
4.2 (0.4 - 176.0)
n = 52
12.6 (19.2)
3.4 (0.7 - 67.6)
n = 52
12.2 (17.8)
4.2 (0.2 - 67.8)
n = 42
31.8 (35.4)
14.8 (1.6 - 131.0)
n = 38
4.7 (2.8)
3.7 (1.9 - 15.5)
n = 48
3.7 (1.7)
3.4 (1.8 - 11.2)
n = 48
(1) 2325
gestational
weeks
(2) 2830
gestational
weeks
(3) 3840
gestational
weeks
(4) 1 day
postpartum
1.7 (0.7)
1.6 (0.9 - 9.0)
n = 402
2.5 (1.1)
2.0 (1.2 - 10.3)
n = 388
2.8 (1.2)
2.5 (1.1 - 10.2)
n = 323
3.0 (1.8)
2.4 (0.7 - 14.3)
n = 275
1.2 (0.4)
1.2 (0.5 - 3.9)
n = 296
1.0 (0.3)
1.0 (0.4 - 1.9)
n = 328
2vs1:b0.001
3vs1:b0.001
3vs2:b0.001
0.16
0.048
4vs1:b0.001
4vs3:0.80
5vs1:b0.001
5vs4:b0.001
6vs1:b0.001
6vs5:b0.001
0.8 (0.2)
0.8 (0.5 - 1.5)
n = 40
b0.001
p-valuea
2vs1:0.08
3vs1:0.93
3vs2:0.12
Non-carriers
with normal
pregnancies
Test
Matched heterozygous
FVL carriers with normal
pregnancies
Mean (SD)
Median
(Min - Max)
n
p-valueb
Mean (SD)
Median
(Min - Max)
n
7.8 (13.1)
3.8 (0.1 - 56.4)
n = 40
7.1 (9.9)
3.9 (0.1 - 48.4)
n = 41
8.7 (9.9)
5.7 (1.8 - 48.1)
n = 37
0.040
1.4 (1.2)
1.0 (0.4 - 6.0)
n = 44
1.7 (1.2)
1.3 (0.6 - 5.8)
n = 43
2.5 (2.0)
1.8 (0.9 - 9.2)
n = 40
5.5 (4.9)
3.8 (1.0 - 20.0)
n = 35
0.6 (0.6)
0.4 (0.2 - 3.0)
n = 41
0.4 (0.4)
0.3 (0.2 - 2.3)
n = 43
0.79
0.51
4vs1:b0.001
4vs3:b0.001
5vs1:0.61
5vs4:b0.001
6vs1:0.12
6vs5:0.11
4.8 (3.2)
3.6 (0.2 - 15.1)
n = 41
0.46
p-valuea
2vs1:0.002
3vs1:b0.001
3vs2:0.001
Test
Mean (SD)
Median
(Min - Max)
n
p-valueb
Mean (SD)
Median
(Min - Max)
n
0.7 (0.6)
0.5 (0.1 - 3.2)
n = 42
0.8 (0.6)
0.7 (0.2 - 3.2)
n = 41
1.4 (1.0)
1.1 (0.3 - 5.6)
n = 36
b0.001
1.3 (1.6)
0.8 (0.3 - 13.0)
n = 403
1.5 (1.4)
1.1 (0.2 - 12.0)
n = 388
2.0 (1.4)
1.5 (0.6 - 10.0)
n = 323
7.9 (10.1)
4.8 (0.4 - 64.0)
n = 275
0.6 (0.5)
0.4 (0.2 - 4.6)
n = 298
0.4 (0.3)
0.3 (0.2 - 3.6)
n = 330
b0.001
b0.001
4vs1:b0.001
4vs3:b0.001
5vs1:b0.001
5vs4:b0.001
6vs1:b0.001
6vs5:b0.001
0.4 (0.6)
0.1 (0.1 - 3.2)
n = 42
b0.001
p-valuea
2vs1:b0.001
3vs1:b0.001
3vs2:b0.001
4vs1:b0.001
4vs3:b0.001
5vs1:b0.001
5vs4:b0.001
6vs1:b0.001
6vs5:b0.001
Test
Mean (SD)
Median
(Min - Max)
n
Non-carriers
with normal
pregnancies
Time point
(5) 45 weeks
postpartum
SF mg/l
FVL, factor V Leiden; F1 + 2, prothrombin fragments 1 + 2; SF, soluble brin; n, number; SD, standard deviation.
a
Test within group is performed by using mixed model repeated measures analysis with the Toeplitz covariance structure, specifying time point as xed effect. Outcome variables F1 + 2, SF, D-dimer Latex and D-dimer ELISA are transformed to
normal distribution in this analysis by Blom's transformation.
b
Test between groups is performed by using mixed model repeated measures analysis, with the Toeplitz covariance structure allowing for heterogeneity between groups, specifying FVL status, time point and interaction between FVL status and
time point as xed effects. Outcome variables F1 + 2, SF and D-dimer Latex are transformed to normal distribution in this analysis by Blom's transformation.
841
842
Fig. 2. Prothrombin fragments 1 + 2 (F1 + 2), soluble brin (SF) and D-Dimer ELISA during pregnancy in Factor V Leiden (FVL) carriers with normal and complicated pregnancies and
non-carriers with normal pregnancies. The boxes show the 25%, 50% and 75% cumulative relative frequencies. The whiskers go 1.5 box lengths from the edge of the box or to the minimum
or maximum values within the fences. Extreme values are shown as small dots. The mean values are shown as dots for carriers and squares for non-carriers. The y-axis has a log2 scale for
F1 + 2 and a log10 scale for SF and D-dimers ELISA. Figures under the plots denote number of women. F1 + 2, prothrombin fragments 1 + 2; SF, soluble brin; C1 and C3, heterozygous
women with uneventful pregnancies. N-C, non-carriers; PMC, carriers with placenta-mediated complications, including preeclampsia, small for gestational age and placental abruption; T:
carriers with homozygosity for FVL or with additional thrombophilia; VTE, carriers with venous thromboembolism.
843
Table 4
Prothrombin fragments 1 + 2, soluble brin, D-dimer ELISA and D-dimer Latex postpartum in heterozygous Factor V Leiden carriers with normal pregnancies delivered vaginally or by
caesarean section.
F1 + 2 (nmol/l)
1 day postpartum
SF (mg/l)
1 day postpartum
Vaginal delivery
Caesarean section
n = 352
3.0 (1.8)
2.4 (0.7; 14.3)
n = 274
1.2 (0.4)
1.2 (0.5; 3.9)
n = 257
1.0 (0.3)
1.0 (0.4; 1.9)
n = 281
n = 45
31.8 (35.4)
14.8 (1.6; 131.0)
n = 38
4.9 (2.9)
3.6 (1.9; 15.5)
n = 41
3.8 (1.8)
3.4 (1.9; 11.2)
n = 42
n = 352
7.9 (10.2)
4.7 (0.4; 64.0)
n = 274
0.5 (0.5)
0.4 (0.2; 4.6)
n = 259
0.4 (0.3)
0.3 (0.2; 3.6)
n = 283
n = 45
5.5 (4.9)
3.8 (1.0; 20.0)
n = 35
0.5 (0.4)
0.4 (0.2; 2.4)
n = 35
0.4 (0.4)
0.3 (0.2; 2.3)
n = 37
n = 56
7.5 (30.4)
1.9 (1.2; 210.0)
n = 47
1.2 (0.3)
1.1 (0.7; 2.0)
n = 42
1.0 (0.3)
0.9 (0.6; 1.8)
n = 47
n=7
37.8 (42.6)
24.0 (1.2; 96.0)
n=6
3.7 (0.7)
3.8 (2.8; 5.0)
n=7
2.6 (0.7)
2.4 (1.8; 3.9)
n=6
n = 56
11.0 (24.9)
5.5 (1.1; 169.0)
n = 47
0.6 (0.5)
0.5 (0.3; 3.0)
n = 42
0.4 (0.2)
0.4 (0.2; 0.9)
n = 47
n=7
10.0 (7.9)
9.0 (1.8; 20.0)
n=5
1.0 (1.0)
0.6 (0.4; 3.0)
n=6
0.6 (0.6)
0.4 (0.2; 1.8)
n=6
p-value
0.08
0.57
0.20
0.62
0.73
0.038
0.20
0.011
0.09
0.22
0.11
0.57
Mean (SD) / Median (Min; Max) / n = are presented for continuous variables.
For comparison between groups, the MannWhitney U-test was used for continuous variables. F1 + 2, prothrombin fragments 1 + 2; SF, soluble brin; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay technique.
SF levels might be explained by the fact that SF is an intermediate product in multi-step processes. The fact that the F1 + 2 level is a measure of
thrombin generation, while the SF level is a measure of brin product
generation, but is also inuenced by inhibitors of coagulation (antithrombin, 2-macroglobulin and 1-antitrypsin) and brinogen, may
be another explanation.
The increase in D-dimer ELISA and D-dimer Latex levels during pregnancy concurs with the only previously reported longitudinal study of
D-dimer [11].
D-dimer Latex levels were increased (above 0.5 mg/l) in heterozygous carriers postpartum: 36% (45 weeks postpartum) and 23%
(810 weeks postpartum), respectively. This has not been reported
before.
Currently, there are controversies about the utility of D-dimer as a
biomarker for VTE during pregnancy [23]. The generally increased Ddimer levels during pregnancy have led to a suggestion that higher cutoff levels for normality during pregnancy and postpartum should be determined, making it possible to use D-dimer, alone or together as part of
a scoring system, to diagnose VTE. The differences between the D-dimer
levels in DVT-positive and DVT- negative women decreased as pregnancy progressed in a study with a relatively small number of DVT [24]. The
higher D-dimer levels in FVL carriers reported in this study must be
taken into consideration in a population with a high percentage of FVL
carriers. The overlap between D-dimer levels in DVT-negative carriers
and DVT-positive non-carriers might be substantial both during pregnancy and in the puerperium. D-dimer levels must be tested and
interpreted with substantial caution in pregnancy and the puerperium.
We found no considerable differences in F1 + 2, SF, D-dimer ELISA
or D-dimer Latex levels in heterozygous women delivered with c.s.
and given thromboprophylaxis, compared with heterozygous women
delivered vaginally and not given thromboprophylaxis. This may be a
result of the thromboprophylaxis. However, the low number of c.s.
may have contributed to the lack of statistical signicance.
The absence of a correlation between SF and D-dimer ELISA levels
postpartum strengthens the evidence that these two assays do not detect the same substances. In a previous study, a low correlation between
these SF and D-dimer ELISA assays was taken as proof that the antibody
that detects SF does not recognize cross-linked brin degradation products [9]. The high correlations between SF and D-dimer ELISA during
pregnancy could be due to the fact that changes in haemostasis and brinolysis inuence both variables in the same direction.
The correlation between the D-dimer Latex and D-dimer ELISA assays during pregnancy and at one day postpartum were high, in accordance with another study [9]. The low correlation postpartum
between D-dimer Latex and D-dimer ELISA can be explained by a
small absolute difference in levels.
The number of placenta-mediated complications in the carriers was
the same as in the general population during the same time period,
844
Table 5
Prothrombin fragments 1 + 2, soluble brin and D-dimer ELISA in heterozygous Factor V Leiden carriers during normal pregnancy and postpartum and in homozygous Factor V Leiden
carriers and in heterozygous Factor V Leiden carriers with additional thrombophilia.
F1 + 2 (nmol/l)
23-25 g w
32-34 g w
38-40 g w
32-34 g w
38-40 g w
SF (mg/l)
23-25 g w
32-34 g w
38-40 g w
n = 408
1.7 (0.7)
1.6 (0.9; 9.0)
n = 402
2.5 (1.1)
2.0 (1.2; 10.3)
n = 388
2.8 (1.2)
2.5 (1.1; 10.2)
n = 323
1.0 (0.3)
1.0 (0.4; 1.9)
n = 328
n = 408
1.3 (1.6)
0.8 (0.3; 13.0)
n = 403
1.5 (1.4)
1.1 (0.2; 12.0)
n = 388
2.0 (1.4)
1.5 (0.6; 10.0)
n = 323
0.4 (0.3)
0.3 (0.2; 3.6)
n = 330
n = 52
19.3 (33.1)
4.2 (0.4; 176.0)
n = 52
12.6 (19.2)
3.4 (0.7; 67.6)
n = 52
12.2 (17.8)
4.2 (0.2; 67.8)
n = 42
3.7 (1.7)
3.4 (1.8; 11.2)
n = 48
n = 19
2.0 (0.5)
1.8 (1.3; 3.6)
n = 19
3.2 (1.0)
3.2 (1.6; 4.4)
n = 19
3.5 (1.2)
3.2 (2.0; 5.6)
n = 16
1.1 (0.4)
1.0 (0.7; 2.1)
n = 14
n = 19
1.5 (1.1)
1.1 (0.5; 5.6)
n = 19
2.7 (1.7)
1.9 (0.8; 5.8)
n = 19
3.6 (2.8)
3.2 (1.2; 11.0)
n = 16
0.6 (0.5)
0.4 (0.2; 1.9)
n = 14
n = 19
11.6 (14.6)
5.3 (2.1; 50.5)
n = 19
17.0 (18.8)
7.3 (0.6; 57.1)
n = 19
16.7 (18.8)
8.3 (0.5; 60.0)
n = 15
4.3 (2.2)
3.7 (1.9; 9.7)
n = 13
p-value
0.007
0.002
0.008
0.75
0.008
b.001
0.002
0.12
0.36
0.041
0.10
0.43
Mean (SD) / Median (Min; Max) / n = are presented for continuous variables. For comparison between groups, the MannWhitney U-test was used for continuous variables. T, homozygous FVL carriers or heterozygous FVL carriers with additional thrombophilia; FVL, factor V Leiden F1 + 2, prothrombin fragments 1 + 2; SF, soluble brin; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay technique; g w, gestational weeks.
overlaps in biomarker levels between heterozygous carriers with normal and complicated pregnancies suggest that these biomarkers cannot
be used as predictors for placenta-mediated complications. In heterozygous carriers, D-dimer levels above 0.5 mg/L were found in about 30 % at
45 weeks postpartum and in about 20 % at 810 weeks postpartum.
These results must be taken into consideration when assessing the probability of VTE during pregnancy and the puerperium. D-dimer levels are
unsuitable for assessing VTE in obstetric patients. Thromboprophylaxis
may prevent increased activation of blood coagulation and brinolysis
following caesarean section.
Funding
Conclusion
Blood coagulation and brinolysis are more activated in FVL carriers
than in non-carriers during pregnancy and early postpartum. Large
Acknowledgements
We wish to express our gratitude to the women participating in
our study; the midwives who enrolled them; the research midwives
at Karolinska University Hospital, for technical assistance; Marianne
Dahlberg, the Department of Clinical Chemistry, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, and Andreas Hillarp, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Malm University Hospital, Malm, for laboratory
supervision; Steffen Rosn, Haemochrom Diagnostica AB, Gothenburg, Sweden, for constructive discussions; Sture Holm, Biostatistic,
the University of Gothenburg, Nils-Gunnar Pehrsson and Aldina
Pivodic, Statistiska konsultgruppen, Gothenburg for support with
statistics; and Joy Ellis, for language review.
References
[1] Smith AA, Jacobson LJ, Miller BI, Hathaway WE, Manco-Johnson MJ. A new euglobulin clot lysis assay for global brinolysis. Thromb Res 2003;112:32937.
[2] Thorsen S, Philips M, Selmer J, Lecander I, stedt B. Kinetics of inhibition of tissuetype and urokinase-type plasminogen activator by plasminogen-activator inhibitor
type 1 and type 2. Eur J Biochem 1988;175:339.
[3] Kjellberg U, Andersson N-E, Rosn S, Tengborn L, Hellgren M. APC resistance and
other haemostatic variables during pregnancy and puerperium. Thromb Haemost
1999;81:52731.
[4] Dahlbck B, Carlsson M, Svensson PJ. Familial thrombophilia due to a previously unrecognized mechanism characterized by poor anticoagulant response to activated
protein C: Prediction of a cofactor to activated protein C. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1993;
90:10048.
[5] Bertina RM, Koeleman BPC, Koster T, Rosendaal FR, Dirven RJ, de Ronde H, et al. Mutation in blood coagulation factor V associated with resistance to activated protein C.
Nature 1994;369:647.
[6] Biron-Andreani C, Schved J-F, Daures J-P. Factor V Leiden mutation and pregnancyrelated venous thromboembolism: What is the exact risk? Thromb Haemost 2006;
96:148.
[7] Bergrem A, Dahm AEA, Jacobsen AF, Sandvik L, Sandset PM. Differential haemostatic
risk factors for pregnancy-related deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.
Thromb Haemost 2012;108:116571.
[8] Bauer KA, Rosenberg RD. Activation markers of coagulation. Baillieres Clin Haematol
1994;7(3):52340 [fr F1 + 2].
[9] Ieko M, Nakabayashi T, Tarumi T, Sumiyoshi N, Yoshida M, Kanazava K, et al. Soluble
brin monomer degradation products as a potentially useful marker for hypercoagulable states with accelerated brinolysis. Clin Chim Acta 2007;386:3845.
[10] Dempe C-E. What role does the measurement of brinogen and its derivates have
in the dignosis of disseminated intravascular coagualtion? Blood Rev 2002;16:
S238.
[11] Eichinger S, Weltermann A, Philipp K, Hafner E, Kaider A, Kittl E-M, et al. Prospective evaluation of hemostatic system activation and thrombin potential in
healthy pregnant women with and without factor V Leiden. Thromb Haemost
1999;82:12326.
[12] Schambeck CM, Eberl E, Geisen U, Grossman R, Keller F. The impact of
dalteparin (Fragmin) on thrombin generation in pregnant women with venous thromboembolism: Signicance of the factor V Leiden mutation. Thromb
Haemost 2001;85:7826.
[13] Kjellberg U, van Rooijen M, Bremme K, Hellgren M. Factor V Leiden mutation and
pregnancy-related complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;203:469.e18.
845
[14] Zller B, Svensson PJ, He X, Dahlbck B. Identication of the same factor V gene mutation in 47 out of 50 thrombosis-prone families with inherited resistance to activated protein C. J Clin Invest 1994;94:25214.
[15] Poort SR, Rosendaal FR, Reitsma PH, Reitsma PH, Bertina RM. A common genetic variation in the 3-untranslated region of the prothrombin gene is associated with elevated plasma prothrombin levels and an increase in venous thrombosis. Blood 1996;
10:3698703.
[16] Soe G, Kohno I, Inuzuka K, Itoh Y, Matsuda M. A monoclonal antibody that recognizes a neo-antigen exposed in the E domain in of brin monomer complexed
with brinogen or its derivatives: its application to the measurement of soluble brin in plasma. Blood 1996;88:210917.
[17] Karlsson O, Sporrong T, Hillarp, Jeppson A, Hellgren M. Prospective longitudinal
study of thromboelastography and standard hemostatic laboratory tests in healthy
women during normal pregnancy. Anesth Analg 2012;115:8908.
[18] Cerneca F, Ricci G, Simeone R, Malisano M, Alberico S, Guaschino S. Coagulation and
brinolysis changes in normal pregnancy. Increased levels of procoagulants and reduced levels of inhibitors during pregnancy induce a hypercoagulable state, combined with a reactive brinolysis. EJOGRB 1997;73:316.
[19] Reber G, Amiral J, de Moerloose. Modied antithrombin III levels during normal
pregnancy and relationship with prothrombin fragment F1 + 2 and thrombinantithrombin complexes. Thromb Res 1998;91:147.
[20] Cadroy Y, Grandjean H, Pichon J, Desprats R, Berrebi A, Fourni A, et al. Evaluation of
six markers of haemostatic system in normal pregnancy and pregnancy complicated
by hypertension or pre-eclampsia. BJOG 1993;100:41620.
[21] Onishi H, Kaniyu K, Iwashita M, Tanaka A, Watanabe T. Fibrin monomer complex in
normal pregnant women: a potential thrombotic marker in pregnancy. Ann Clin
Biochem 2007;44:44954.
[22] Dempe C-E, Wurst M, Smolinski M, Lorenz S, Osika A, Olenik D, et al. Use of soluble
brin instead of D-dimer as brin-related marker may enhance the prognostic
power of the ISTH overt DIC score. Thromb Haemost 2004;91:8128.
[23] Chan W-S, Ginsberg JS. Diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in pregnancy: a
study in extrapolation or a science in evolution. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2009;
7(12):147982.
[24] Chan W-S, Lee A, Spencer A, Chunilal M, Crowther W, Wu W, et al. D-dimer testing
in pregnant patients: towards determining the next level in the diagnosis of deep
vein thrombosis. J Thromb Haemost 2010;8:100411.
[25] Sucak GT, Acar K, Sucak A, Kirazli S, Haznedar R. Increased global brinolytic capacity as a clue for activated brinolysis in pre-eclampsia. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis
2006;17:34752.
[26] Freeman DJ, Tham K, Brown EA, Rumley A, Lowe GD, Greer IA. Fetal corticotrophinreleasing hormone mRNA, but not phosphatidylserine-exposing microparticles, in
maternal plasma are associated with factor VII activity in pre-eclampsia. J Thromb
Haemost 2008;6:4217.
[27] Schjetlein R, Haugen G, Wislff F. Markers of intravascular coagulation and brinolysis in preeclampsia: association with intrauterine growth retardation. Acta Obstet
Gynecol Scand 1997;76:5416.
[28] Belo L, Santos-Silva A, Rumley A, Lowe G, Pereira-Leite L, Quintanilha A, et al. Elevated tissue plasminogen activator as a potential marker of endothelial dysfunction in
pre-eclampsia: correlation with proteinuria. BJOG 2002;109:12505.
[29] Francalanci I, Comeglio P, Liotta AA, Cellai AP, Fedi S, Paretti E, et al. D-dimer in intrauterine growth retardation and gestational hypertension. Thromb Res 1995;80:8992.
[30] Nolan TE, Smith RP, Devoe LD. Maternal plasma D-Dimer levels in normal and complicated pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 1993;81:2358.
[31] stlund E, Bremme K, Wiman B. Soluble brin in plasma as a sign of activated coagulation in patients with pregnancy complications. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1998;
77:1659.