Professional Documents
Culture Documents
u
at r
e ar
fe
Editorial Review
53
54
development of Blockchain
also met many of the desires of
individuals who were involved
in the early stages of making
bitcoin transactions. Many of
these early individuals involved
with Bitcoin strongly wished to
avoid dealing with third-party
intermediaries such as financial
institutions. This desire was
partly driven by the users wish
to achieve cost savings and
ensure their privacy. However,
it was largely driven by their
dislike of government, with a
decided libertarian perspective
on need for the development of
Bitcoin. Bitcoin was to be the
answer to the financial crisis
of 20072008.
In any case, Blockchain
turned out to be extremely
effective in maintaining a
secure ledger of bitcoin transactions. As with any new project, there have been some
miscues along the way. Since
the protocol and code was
and currently is open-source
software it has benefited from
the efforts of many interested
coders who wanted Bitcoin
and Blockchain to work.
Thus, many of the problematic aspects of the design and
coding errors have been short
lived. Currently, Blockchain
has proven successful enough
that many are trying to apply
it to their firm. The success
of Blockchain has financial
services firms moving quickly
to utilize the benefits of
Blockchain and similar systems within their firms. The
financial services firms see this
as appropriating Blockchain
technology within their own
settlement transactions. These
could include items such as
remittance settlements and
mortgage settlements. There
are many nonfinancial service
related opportunities where
DOI 10.1002/jcaf
CRYPTOCURRENCY
There are two basic kinds
of cyber or digital currencies.
Both are virtual currencies
but serve different purposes.
One is a pure virtual currency
normally restricted to controlled environments such as
inside of a social network or
an online game. This type of
digital currency is subject to a
centralized authority that controls the supply of the digital
currency. It can still be used to
purchase items, but normally
only within the confines of the
centralized authority. Amazon
Coins is an example of this
digital currency. This type of
digital currency does not use
a Blockchain system since the
validation is derived from
the issuing entity.
More relevant to Blockchain is cryptocurrency. This
form of digital currency is also
used to purchase items, but its
acceptance is not restricted or
controlled by a central authority. This lack of a controlling
central authority makes the currency appealing to those wishing to avoid the problems faced
by current financial institutions.
Its ability to be used as a currency is based on peer-to-peer
protocols making it secure and
virtually impossible to steal.
The most popular of these
cryptocurrencies is Bitcoin,
with over 80% of the market
capitalization and even more of
the number and value of transactions. Two others of some
interest to the topic are Litecoin
and Primecoin. However, the
one with most importance to
our topic is Bitcoin. The history
and issues around Bitcoin are
well beyond the scope of this
paper. However, it was in creating a system to make Bitcoin
trustworthy that developers created the Blockchain encryption
method that does interest us.
Bitcoin is still using the original
Blockchain to record transactions. Currently, bitcoin is still
the most used cryptocurrency
used to purchase a myriad of
goods and services with choices
of these products and services
ever expanding.
Two other cryptocurrencies that may prove relevant
for the issues within this paper
are Litecoin and Primecoin.
Litecoin is probably the second
most widely known cryptocurrency. While Litecoin is based
on the same protocol as Bitcoin, its method of validation
is designed to be much easier
to use since it uses a simpler
algorithm designed for Linux
backup systems. This simplified
approach enhances the users
ability to maintain the validation process. It also generates
a richer reward in a shorter
period, while requiring the use
of simpler resources. Most
importantly, it is able to generate blocks at a faster rate than
the system behind Bitcoin. The
simpler and quicker method for
generating a Blockchain may
make their system more valuable to others seeking to apply
Blockchains.
Primecoin also has a different protocol for proving
the validity of transactions.
2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
BLOCKS
The fundamental storage
space for information about
Bitcoin transactions is called a
block. Each block stores data
about the Bitcoin network. In
addition, each block contains
information about some or
all of the most recent Bitcoin
transactions not previously
entered in prior blocks. Thus,
a block works like a real-time
general ledger or record book.
Within each block is a permanent store of records of past
Bitcoin transactions. Once a
block is completed, it gives
way to the next block. These
blocks are joined together in a
linked chain. This relationship
led to the name Blockchain.
Importantly, a Blockchain has
the important strength that,
once written, the blocks within
the chain cannot be altered or
removed.
A Blockchain works similar
to the recording of bank transactions, with a block representing the transaction confirmations such as a deposit slip.
However, within the Bitcoin
protocol, the block not only
contains information about
the transaction but information about past transactions.
The information on the block
needs to be validated, which
in the Bitcoin protocol is done
through a process known as
2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
MINING
Bitcoin mining is the process by which transactions
are verified and added to the
public ledger, known as the
Blockchain, and the means
through which additional bitcoins are released. In essence,
it is a bookkeeping service. The
system involves individuals,
known as miners, working in a
peer-to-peer network consisting of individual nodes. Their
task is to solve a mathematical
problem associated with information on the block. Once the
winning miner solves the problem, the solution is shared with
other mining nodes as a proof
of work. The other miners then
accept this proof of work, and
the block is added to the Blockchain. This process validates
the information on the block.
The winning miner gains a
reward of additional bitcoins,
with their reward being the first
record in the next block.
Anyone with access to the
Internet and suitable hardware
can participate in mining. However, the process has evolved to
where specialized instruments
are needed to be successful
in mining at a profitable rate.
Graphics cards turned out to
be more effective at mining and
replaced standard computers.
Eventually, hardware known
as an application-specific
integrated circuit (ASIC) was
designed specifically for mining bitcoins. Mining is very
BLOCKCHAIN
The Wikipedia definition
of a Blockchain is: a block
chain or Blockchain is a distributed database that maintains a continuously growing
list of data records that are
hardened against tampering
and revision, even by operators of the data stores nodes.
One can view a Blockchain as a
public ledger of all transactions
that have ever been executed.
It is constantly growing as
completed blocks are added
to previous blocks, forming a
chain. Importantly, blocks are
added to the Blockchain in
a linear, chronological order.
Each miner gets a copy of the
DOI 10.1002/jcaf
56
Blockchains Impact on
Financial Services
The area where many see
Blockchain first changing the
current financial services is the
back-office handling of transactions. When a financial institution sells a syndicated loan
or derivative, the recording of
the transaction is time consuming and involves burdensome
back-office processes. These
processes rely on negotiated
contracts with the numerous
associated lawyers and contact
between the parties to finish
DOI 10.1002/jcaf
BLOCKCHAIN 2.0
Within this category are the
many ideas that firms are developing to utilize the benefits of
Blockchain outside of financial
services. Since many are only
nominally connected to Bitcoin
protocol, the term Blockchain
2.0 is used to group these ideas
together. IBM has introduced
a protocol for smart contracts
Kurt Fanning, PhD, CPA, CMA, CIA, CISA, is a Professor at Grand Valley State University. Kurt has
written articles for publication in scholarly journals such as the International Journal of Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, Accounting, Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance,
New Review of Applied Expert Systems and Emerging Technologies, and Financial Studies Journal. His
primary teaching and research interests are in management fraud and accounting information systems.
David P. Centers, MBA, is an Accounting Instructor at Grand Valley State University. Previously, he worked
in governmental, industrial, and not-for-profit companies as an auditor, plant controller, and controller.
DOI 10.1002/jcaf