Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Industrial Revolution brought widespread change to the landscape and to society. The shift from an
agricultural to an industrial economy created a new class of low-wage workers in European and American cities.
The Industrial Revolution eroded agrarian society. People moved into cities to supply the labor force required by
factories. Urban populations swelled, causing concern for public welfare.
Social reformers lobbied to improve the living conditions of the urban poor by providing public parks. The
aesthetic language of the English landscape garden was adopted as a model for the parks, and persists in the
Western imagination as an icon of nature. The physical and social structures that have come to defi ne city life
took shape in the 19th century.
The Romantic sentiment of the 19th century contributed to a conception of nature as being restorative. People
understood the political, economic and social value of the landscape, and campaigned to access its benefits.
The unquestioned belief in technology prompted a backlash: Romanticism became the antidote to the ills of
mechanized society. For the middle class, emotion triumphed over reason, imagination was prized more than
cultivated scholarship, and nature was elevated as the source of inspiration. Society believed sensitivity to
natural phenomena and appreciation of natural beauty to be morally and spiritually uplifting.
LANDSCAPE DEVELOPMENT IN ENGLAND
The 19th-century landscape was urban, public, and Romantic.
The landscape garden style, so popular in the 18th century, became less feasible in the changed economic
circumstances of the 19th century. Large estates were expensive to maintain, and many property owners had to
sell or split their estates into smaller units for development. Panoramic views were curtailed.
Attention shifted from the scale of the wider landscape to the scale of the individual plant.
The development of the glasshouse, and the proliferation of gardening literature all made gardening accessible
and fashionable with the middle class.
Essentially miniature greenhouses, enabled live specimens rather than seeds to be transported from China,
India, and North America, dramatically increasing the number of plants available to the trade.
Small glasshouses were marketed to homeowners who were eager to include tender plants in their gardens.
Horticultural industries prospered from the middle-class zeal for flower and vegetable gardens.
In addition to new technologies geared to the management of more modest-sized properties, numerous
periodicals and magazines were devoted to small-scale gardening. Garden writers focused on botany rather
than aesthetic theory. The inexpensive publications were eagerly read by the new class of homeowners.
Conservatories displaying rare plants were popular public attractions by innovations in glasshouse technology;
smaller glasshouses, affordable by middle-class homeowners, were used for entertaining.
The concern for social welfare in the 19th century was prompted in part by a general awareness of the
detrimental effects of industrial development and the paternalistic concept of noblesse oblige. Public parks were
a response to unchecked urban growth and the unsanitary conditions of cities.
STYLES FOLLOWED
The stylistic controversies that raged at the end of the 18th century were
stirred up again & the debate this time was centered on aspects of formal and informal styles.
Formal styles were characterized by the revival of architectural gardens
planting areas defined by built elements and strong geometries. Often these parterres contained colourful
flowers arranged in mosaic-like patterns and changed seasonally, a
practice known as carpet bedding. Plants numbered in the tens of thousands, a symbol of the status of the
owner.
Gardenesque Style
Concept J. C. Loudon
The formal geometries of the garden were appreciated by him that were so clearly of
art rather than nature. He proposed a new style, termed the gardenesque,
that reflected popular interest in the aesthetic qualities of plants and the practice of
horticulture.
The gardenesque was a particular style of planting wherein each plant was displayed
individually, expressing the artistic talents of the gardener, not the ideals of the owner or
designer. Lawn was kept away from planting areas, and ample room was provided for
cultivation and maintenance. The viewers focus was on the individual character of a tree
or shrub, not on the mass of vegetation or the wider landscape scene. Loudons theory
was that a garden is a work of creative artistry, not an imitation of nature. He believed
gardens should be composed with specimen plants of unusual form, particularly exotic
species, unified in some ordered scheme.
Unfortunately, the result was often an unrelated collection of plants, not the structured
composition Loudon envisioned.
Picturesque Style
Concept William Robinson
Critics reacted against the stiffness of bedding out and the eclecticism of the gardenesque
style. As per their opinion geometrical presentation of plants as degrading the true garden
art & people inclined to these practices limit themselves to wallpaper and rug design.
Robinson proposed a natural approach to planting based on the horticultural needs and
artistic qualities of the plants. He advocated the use of herbaceous borders mixed with
wildflowers as a way to merge the gardenesque with the picturesque. Masses of shrubs
could be broken up by outlying plants, softening the perimeter.
He catalogued all the new plant species introduced in the 19 th century and focused on
creating low maintenance habitats.
Combination of Art & nature
The controversy of formal & informal style raged until art and nature met in the
partnership of architect Edwin Lutyens (18691944) and landscape designer
Gertrude Jekyll (18431932).
She developed planting design theories based on principles of form, texture, and
color. Lutyens created the structural geometry for Jekylls softscape. His highly
detailed forms, built with local materials, were the perfect complement to her
sweeping strokes of flora.
The Arts And Crafts Movement
The Industrial Revolution brought unprecedented change to the landscape.
Factories replaced home workshops. Trade boomed and population
increased. People increasingly moved to cities;
John Ruskin (18191900) was one of the first people to question societys blind
faith in technology. He saw traditional landscapes and lifestyles deteriorate and
called for the preservation of both. In 1848 a group of artists known as the preRaphaelites tried to revive traditional aesthetic values. They were particularly
inspired by medieval craftsmanship and regarded the guild system as an answer
to industrial order.
Fig ure 4
Herbaceous Borders: Gertrude Jekyll
developed William Robinsons ideas
Figure 5
William Morris .: The flloral motif in Morris
wall paper design
The Arts and Crafts movement of the 1880s and 1890s was a response to the poor quality of machine-made
goods and the process of mass production. Writer, designer, and socialist William Morris founded a decorative
arts company whose work was based in the Arts and Crafts style. Morris used organic patterns and fl oral motifs,
finding inspiration in nature. These Romantic impulses can be seen in the cult of the English cottage garden, with
its straight paths and profusion of fl owers, and in the development of the rural cemetery and garden suburb.
LANDSCAPE DEVELOPMENT IN FRANCE
Haussmanns Concept
Haussmanns concept of a modern city:
wide, straight boulevards with imposing facades, converging at
major junctions marked by monuments, public buildings and
points of importance such as city gates or railway stations.
Haussmann was able to conceptualize the entire city in
technological, mechanistic terms as an entity.
Haussmanns Design
The River Seine provided the central spine for design growth. From it
were extended perpendicularly a series of axial developments,
notably the esplanade of the Invalides and Champ de Mars with the
Eiffel Tower. These developments were gradually interlaced and
Figure 5 Haussmanns Paris: A geometry of order and
interconnected with the Champs Elysees and other boulevard
control was imposed on the medieval fabric of Paris
extensions, forming the beginning of a regional network.
Haussmann overlaid a formal geometry on the medieval fabric of the city. The new street plan facilitated modern
transportation and commerce, but was also a form of social control. Wide boulevards divided the city into
manageable districts, and open spacesplaceswere traffic nodes.
Building codes established uniform heights for new structures. A grand opera house and other cultural institutions
were built as part of Haussmanns plan.
Haussmann the destroyer
The urban renewal campaign came at the expense of the working-class neighbourhoods, which were destroyed
during the improvements. Ironically, the ideal of social reform had the effect of displacing the poor, forcing them
out of the city limits.
PARIS PARKS
Haussmanns plan keyed public parks to the citys geography: Bois de
Boulogne to the west, Bois de Vincennes to the east, Parc des ButtesChaumont to the north, and Parc Montsouris to the south.
The Bois de Boulogne, a former royal hunting park, was opened to the public
by Louis XIV and given to the city in 1851.Prior to the French Revolution, it
was a fashionable location for the social promenade. Napoleon III was
impressed by Londons public parks and had Haussmann redesign the Bois
de Boulogne in the English landscape style.
Haussmann converted the Bois de Vincennes, a former military parade
ground, to a public park in 1860. Located in the working-cla ss section east
of the city center, the park contained promenades like the Bois de Boulogne,
so the common people would have equal opportunity to educate and
improve themselves by imitating their more privileged neighbours. A former
quarry in the northern section of the city created a naturally picturesque
site for Parc des Buttes-Chaumont.
Built from 18641867, the park contains a steep promontory that rises from a central lake. A suspension bridge
connects the island with the banks. The cliff is topped with a circular temple. Classically themed follies coexist
with grottoes and waterfalls.
Haussmanns plan also included the design of 24 neighborhood parks, decorated with Alphands gates,
treetlights, and furniture.
INTERNATIONAL EXPOSITIONS
During the 19th century, countries held worlds fairs and exhibitions to show off their cultural advancements and
technological achievements. The Great Exhibition of London in 1851 was followed by international exhibitions in
Paris in 1855, 1867, 1878, and 1889. For the exhibition in 1889, celebrating the centennial of the revolution,
Gustave Eiffel designed the iron tracery of the Eiffel Towerat 98 4 feet high, it remains one of the tallest tructures
in the world.
Figure 7 TECHNOLOGICAL FEAT: built for a world expo in 1889, the Eiffel Tower remains an icon of Str. Engg.
DESIGN VOCABULARY
ENGLAND
Beds and Borders
FRANCE
Place and Promenade
Vegetation:
All native trees like oak, Elms, Beeches, pines and limes were planted sparingly to provide tone.
Trees were planted to appear as groups ( Clumps). Belts were enclosing components like scaled
down forests. These belts and clumps were placed accordingly as if to compose a picture and to
direct the eye towards a particular direction.
Thicket of trees was used to mark the boundaries.
Horizontal edging with the help of perennial herbaceous plants.
Drooping trees and shrubs were used.
All native trees were planted .
Planted in groups. Tree belts are used to enclose space or scale down the forest.
SIGNIFICANT PERSONALITIES
England - J.C.Loudon, Joseph Paxton, William Robibson, Edwin Lutyens, Gertude Jekill
France - E. Haussman, Adolphe Alphand, Gustave Eiffel
SIGNIFICANT EXAMPLES
Crystal Palace, Brikenhead Park, Liverpool; Marsh Court (Hampshire) and Hestercombe Somerset).
Paris: City Planning, Bois De Boulegene, Eiffel Tower
Yet, throughout Britain there are gardens great and small, formal and informal, private and public, that illustrate
the British passion for creating green, growing spaces of their own. All are different, and all, like their owners and
creators, have a distinct personality.