Project Critique

Objective:
You are to take a critical view (critique) of your project and two other groups projects and provide
feedback so that improvements can be made on future projects.
Introduction & Rubric:
You are to critique your project and two other groups The purpose of your critique is to provide
feedback on items that were done well and items that could use improvement. Grading for your
critique is based on the following:
A level specific and detailed feedback is given - how and why items
were done well, and how/why items could be improved. Feedback is
specific to each item and is explained with enough detail so that it is
clearly understood what could be changed.
B level specific feedback is given, but lacks some details. Items are
identified and it is shown what was done well or not done well, but it is
missing some details on how/why and how to improve items.
C level general feedback is given. There is little or no feedback on
how/why items were done well or could be improved. Comments are
missing significant details on how/why and how to improve items.
D level little feedback is given, is incomplete, or is not related to
items. Feedback has little use for improving future projects. Comments
such as good job, looks cool, well done, could be better, etc. are
provided.
F level no feedback, or significantly incomplete/not related to items.

YOUR NAME: John Lee

Self Critique. Provide feedback on the following areas:
1. Was the project completed according to the requirements? Why or why not?

2. BE SPECIFIC - Which items (if any) were done well and explain why?
I think I did my animation and drawing part the best because I put effort in it and I already
knew how to animate it before.
3. BE SPECIFIC - Which items (if any) were NOT done well or could be improved and explain
why?
I think drawing the characters could have been improved because they dont look too good.
4. Describe the overall quality of the project what could be done differently.
I think overall, this project was okay. I think it could have been done differently by teaching
more about how to animate.
5. How does this project compare to other ones you have seen explain?
I have seen other projects and theyre usually just making something about a certain topic, but I
like how in this project we could have been making our own alternative endings.
Group #1 NAME:
Provide feedback on the following areas:
1. Was the project completed according to the requirements? Why or why not?

2. BE SPECIFIC - Which items (if any) were done well and explain why?

3. BE SPECIFIC - Which items (if any) were NOT done well or could be improved and explain
why?

4. Describe the overall quality of the project what could be done differently.

5. How does this project compare to other ones you have seen explain?

Group #2 NAME:
Provide feedback on the following areas:
1. Was the project completed according to the requirements? Why or why not?

2. BE SPECIFIC - Which items (if any) were done well and explain why?

3. BE SPECIFIC - Which items (if any) were NOT done well or could be improved and explain
why?

4. Describe the overall quality of the project what could be done differently.

5. How does this project compare to other ones you have seen explain?