Professional Documents
Culture Documents
www.elsevier.com/locate/toxlet
Review
Groundwater pollution and remediation options for multisource contaminated aquifers (Bitterfeld/Wolfen, Germany)
P. Wycisk a,*, H. Weiss b, A. Kaschl b, S. Heidrich b, K. Sommerwerk a
a
Department of Environmental Geology, Institute of Geological Sciences, Martin Luther University, Domstr. 5, D-06108 Halle (Saale),
Germany
b
Interdisciplinary Department of Industrial and Mining Landscapes, UFZ Centre for Environmental Research Leipzig-Halle,
Permoserstr. 15, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany
Received 15 September 2002; accepted 12 December 2002
Abstract
Large-scale contaminated megasites like Bitterfeld/Wolfen in the eastern part of Germany are characterized by a
regional pollution of soil, surface water and groundwater due to the long and varied history of the chemical industry on
location. The pollutants in groundwater may spread to uncontaminated areas and endanger receptors like surface water
and drinking water wells according to the site-specific hydrologic regime. In addition, the sheer extension of the
contamination at megasites as well as the existence of large densely populated areas and land of high-reuse value
prevent a simple risk management strategy of use restriction for the whole area. Since a complete clean-up of the
groundwater on a megasite is neither economically feasible nor technically possible within a reasonable time-frame, a
multi-approach remediation strategy is needed, taking into account the immediate risks for human health, ecosystem
and so-called protectable goods. Moreover, the contaminants at megasites typically represent a dangerous cocktail of
multiple harmful substances stemming from a variety of sources, which may interact with each other and complicate the
search for an appropriate remediation strategy. At the SAFIRA-project site in Bitterfeld approaches for in situ
remediation of multiple contaminants in groundwater are being tested. Alternatives in local implementation strategies
as well as consequences of long-term restrictions for megasites like Bitterfeld need an independent evaluation of the
situation using a risk-based approach. For this reason, a GIS-based 3D model of the area including geology,
contaminants, hydrogeology, land-use and protected areas has been built. The regional groundwater pollution is
characterized by contamination profiles of all monitored substances. In the area of investigation, e.g. threefold and
fourfold threshold levels of chlorinated methane, ethane and ethene as well as HCH-isomers, mono-, di- and
tetrachlorobenzene, DDT-isomers and benzene are frequently detected in groundwater, that means in at least 60% of
the wells that were sampled. High median values of more than 10 mg/l were calculated for cis /trans -1,2-dichloroethene,
1,2-dichloroethane, chloroethene and monochlorobenzene. In general, the regional distribution of contaminants reflect
the different sources and pathways, and give first results from a regional point of view, depending on a land-use
classification of specific areas.
# 2003 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
344
1. Introduction
So-called megasites of a regional scale represent
a complex problem in the field of integrated
contamination site management and risk assessment for the site owners and stakeholders involved. Megasites can result from former
industrial and mining areas, harbors and military
areas and are commonly found inside and outside
Europe, as we know today. Due to the large
amount of contaminants that have entered the
soil and groundwater on a regional scale, it must
be assumed that these sites will emit pollutants for
a long time to come, if preventive measures are not
undertaken. Megasites like Bitterfeld/Wolfen with
a long industrial history have a multi-source
origin. These, in general, intractable site history
of contaminant inputs in addition to a large
variety of contaminants of different chemical
properties complicate the assessment of potential
health effects and represent a challenging situation
for the remediator (Krapp and Ruske, 1992;
Walkow et al., 2000).
Post-research in the field of risk assessment and
groundwater remediation techniques has been
mainly restricted to single-source contamination
sites with individual plumes of contaminated
groundwater. Multi-source megasites are characterized, in the case study of Bitterfeld/Wolfen, by
an extended mixture of organic pollutants, which
is typical for the situation of the industrial site, and
possible synergistic and antagonistic effects, which
have not yet been examined to the necessary
details. Since a complete clean-up of groundwater
of the megasite including the removal of the
contaminated source areas /10 km2 is neither
technically nor economically feasible within an
intermediate time-frame, an effective remediation
strategy must focus on risk minimization (Wycisk
et al., 1997; Wycisk, 1998). Land-use restriction
measures as well as simple relocation are in many
cases not a desired option for a regional scale
contamination, due to the given high land-reuse
value within the region. Human and ecosystem
risk management must be compliant to the national and governmental (state) regulations and
will present an ongoing challenge within the
European Water Framework in the years to come.
2. Bitterfeld/Wolfen megasite
The industrial region of Leipzig /Halle /Bitterfeld in eastern Germany is characterized by overlapping environmental impacts of the chemical
industry, an extensive devastation of the landscape, and a lowering of the groundwater table
caused by lignite mining. Among the different
tasks of land reclamation, the management of
hazardous-waste deposits and groundwater remediation are the most urgent. Underground and
open-cast mining activities since 1830 and the
concentration of chemical industry sites led to an
extensive lowering of the groundwater table and a
change of the groundwater dynamics. The major
part of industrial-waste deposits is in contact with
the groundwater. As a consequence of this hydrogeological situation and the low-flow velocities,
the landfills currently show a stagnating emission
pattern.
An area of about 235 km2 is affected in the
Bitterfeld region, of which an area of 25 km2
shows a significant groundwater contamination,
containing a volume of about 200 million m3. The
restoration of pre-mining groundwater conditions
is the major task in re-development of post-mining
landscapes. This will have considerable consequences for the assessment of the polluted areas
and the landfills.
The increase of the groundwater level will also
cause considerable problems for the basements of
the buildings in the region. During the last
hundred years, the mean groundwater level was
kept noticeably below the surface. The consequences of the currently rising groundwater level
are not only damages to buildings, but also the
mobilizing effect on contaminants and their transport into basements of inhabited structures (buildings, houses).
In northwest of Bitterfeld, several former opencast lignite mines have been used as landfills for
chemical wastes. Hydrogeclogically, the waste sites
are situated in a region with severely disturbed
groundwater conditions due to the mining activities. Since the industrial dumps were incompletely
sealed, the contaminates affected the groundwater
directly. Fig. 1 gives an overview of the groundwater-flow direction and the abundant distribution of large contaminated sites.
The Antonie landfill, for example, contains
about 6 million tons of various industrial residues,
including waste material from pesticide produc-
345
Fig. 1. Overview of the Bitterfeld area with the distribution of contamination sites and the major groundwater-flow direction, 1995.
346
Fig. 2. Schematic geological and hydrogeological setting of the pathway of contaminants at the Bitterfeld area, which has been
dominated by industrial and mining activities for more than 100 years.
347
348
Fig. 3. Regional distribution and total frequency of selected organic compounds and substances from the upper aquifer, like BTEX,
volatile chlorinated organic compounds (LHKW), and chlorobenzene (CB). Groundwater contours from the year 2000.
to the site-specific hydrologic regime. The extension of the contamination at the multi-source
megasite as well as the existence of large densely
populated areas and land of high-reuse value
prevent a risk management strategy of use restriction for the whole area. Since a complete clean-up
of the groundwater on a megasite is neither
economically feasible nor technically possible
within a reasonable time-frame, a multi-approach
remediation strategy is needed taking into account
the immediate risks for human health, ecosystem
and so-called protectable goods. Moreover, the
contaminants at the megasite typically represent a
cocktail of multiple harmful substances stemming
from a variety of sources, which may interact with
each other and complicate the search for an
appropriate remediation strategy. Fig. 4 gives a
schematic overview of possible remediation options at the megasite.
To stop the uncontrolled spreading and extension of the contaminants in the groundwater
349
Table 1
Average detected concentration in mg/l of indicated organic compounds per classified land-use unit
LHKW
BTEX
CB
HCH
DDT/D/E
Alluvial plain
Mining areas
Urban areas
Industrial areas
Agricultural
Total area
n /RL
MEC
n /RL
MEC
n /RL
MEC
n /RL
MEC
n /RL
MEC
n /RL
MEC
51
40
46
28
27
16.7
4.8
17.0
1.8
0.2
107
62
84
58
32
22.1
2.7
15.8
2.6
0.1
36
24
34
11
10
66.0
11.2
13.2
2.0
0.2
155
130
149
124
97
89.4
15.7
89.2
2.6
0.3
16
13
16
1
0
5.8
2.5
10.2
/
/
365
269
329
222
166
42.7
8.2
26.5
2.5
0.2
The measured concentrations (MEC) reflect the source /receptor (Mulde River) relation of the pathway of contaminants. Selective
data set 9198M. MEC, mean emission concentration; RL, relevance level; LHKW, volatile chlorinated organic compounds; CB,
chlorobenzene (modified after Thieken, 2001).
Fig. 4. Sketch of the long-distance related fate processes of organic contaminants at megasites and alternative remediation options for
groundwater.
350
Acknowledgements
The SAFIRA project is funded by the German
Federal Ministry of Education and Research (E1.1
FKZ 02WT0023). We are grateful to the LAF,
GP (Bitterfeld/Wolfen) of Saxony Anhalt and
O
the Landratsamt Bitterfeld providing us with the
groundwater monitoring data used in the project.
References
Krapp, L., Ruske, R., 1992. Geologische Verhaltnisse von
Bitterfeld und ihre Relevanz zu Kontaminationen des
Grundwassers und Bodens. In: Hille, J., Ruske, R., Scholz,
R.W., Walkow, F. (Eds.), Bitterfeld, Modellhafte okologische Bestandsaufnahme einer Kontaminierten Industrieregion. 1. Bitterfelder Umweltkonferenz. Erich SchmidtVerlag, Berlin, pp. 85 /92.
Lucke, E., Gromann, J., 2002. Grundwasser Management am
Standort Bitterfeld /Sachstand und Optimierungskonzept.
In: Lal, M., Scholz, S. (Eds.), Berichte vom 18. Bochumer
Altlasten-Seminar 2002 und 13. Leipziger Altlasten-Seminar
2002, Schurmann/Klages, Bochum, pp. 371 /384.
Merkel, P., Teutsch, G., Wei, H., Schirmer, M., 2001.
SAFIRA (Remediation Research in Regionally Contaminated Aquifers) */Reactive Permeable Barrier Approach.
Groundwater Quality 2001, Sheffield.
Ruske, R., Hubner, J., Bohme, O., Falke, P., 1997. Ergebnisse
der geologisch-hydrogeologisch-geotechnischen Standorterkundung. In: Wei, H., Teutsch, G., Daus (Eds.), Sanierungsforschung in Regional Kontaminierten Aquiferen
(SAFIRA), UFZ Bericht, Leipzig, 27/1997, pp. 14 /17.
Schirmer, M., Jones, I., Teutsch, G., Lerner, D.N., 1995.
Development and testing of multi-level sock samplers for
groundwater. J. Hydrol. 171, 239 /257.
Teutsch, G., Grathwohl, P., Schad, H., Werner, P., 1996. In
situ-Reaktionswande */ein neuer Ansatz zur passiven Sanierung von Boden- und Grundwasserverunreinigungen.
Grundwasser 1, 12 /20.
Thieken, A.H., 2001. Schadstoffmuster in der regionalen
Grundwasserkontamination der mitteldeutschen Industrieund Bergbauregion Bitterfeld-Wolfen. Ph.D. Thesis. Martin-Luther-Universitat, Fb. Geowissenschaften, Halle
(Saale), 147 pp.
Walkow, F., Enders, K., Peklo, P., 2000. The pollution of soil
and groundwater in Bitterfeld. In: Wei, H., Rinjnaarts, H.,
Staps, S., Merkel, P. (Eds.), SAFIRA */Abstracts of the
Workshop of November 17 /18, 1999, at Bitterfeld, Germany, UFZ-Bericht, 23/2000, pp. 7 /12.
351