Professional Documents
Culture Documents
and
examples that appeared in the main form without being attached to the
prothetic, these examples are remained from Middle Egyptian Texts.
- The omission of the prothetic i., when the participle is attached to a
(in)definite article or demonstrative pronoun, and when participle is used in
the forward title.
- The prothetic appears only very late with the verb (wn). During the 18th, 19 th
and 20th dyn., while it is not a rule, that participle of verb (wn) may be
appeared without prothetic.
- There are many examples where the participle remains at the main form
(where the prothetic doesnt appear) without being preceded for as much
(in)defined article, or demonstrative pronoun or adjective.
- Participle of more than three consonants is formed from verb iri followed by
the infinitive of the participial verb; in this case the prothetic might be
appeared.
1
- Unlike participles in Middle Egyptian that show special endings with each
gender, participles in Late Egyptian dont show any particular endings; only
is used in many examples, few examples have
or
as endings.
- Some forms have t attached to the verb-stem, but it no longer has any
morphological value; it is found also with participles masculine singular or
neuters. Its presence is probably due to the influence of spellings of the
infinitive form much used in Late Egyptian.
- There is no difference between singular and plural in Late Egyptian
Participles. The participle is usually not terminated. However, in the 18 th and
early 19th dyn., the ending -w of the plural is sometimes appeared, also
can
appears more with weak verbs (3ae or 4ae inf.) than others.
- Participles in Late Egyptian no longer agree in gender and number with its
antecedent.
- Participle when formed from transitive verb can be followed by its object,
which always has to be dependent pronoun; but when the participle is formed
from verb iri followed by the infinitive of the participial verb, which is formed
from transitive verb, the participial verbs pronominal object has to be suffix
pronoun
followed by bwpw
participles in the form bwpw.f sDm for perfect participle and nty
by
in negating
followed
The next table shows the differences between both active and passive participles in
Middle and Late Egyptian:
Active Participle
M.E.
L.E.
M.E.
L.E.
(i.)
(i.)
Masc. Sing.
Fem. Sing.
.t
.t
Masc. Plur.
(.w)
(.w)
appear alone or
Fem. Plur.
(.wt)
appears or (.w)
(.wt)
changed by (.y)
Masc. Sing.
mr
(i.)wn+(Hr)+inf.
mry
(i.)sDm
Fem. Sing.
mrt
(i.)wn+old perfective
mryt
Masc. Plur.
mrw
(i.)sDm
mryw
Masc. Sing.
mrrj/mrry
i.ir sDm
mrrw
i.ir sDm
Fem. Sing.
mrrt/mrrt
mrrt
Masc. Plur.
mrrjw/mrryw
nty+old perfective
mrrw
sDm.ty.fy
sDm.ty.fy*
sDm.ty.fy
Morphology
Prothetic
Ending
Tenses
Perfect
Imperfect
Prospective
Perfect
Negation
Passive Participle
sDm.ty.fy*
tm sDm*
tm sDm*
Imperfect
tm.ty.fy sDm
tm sDm*
nty bw sDm.f **
nty bw sDm.f **
nty bn sDm**
nty bn sDm**
nty bn sw Hr sDm**
Prospective
tm sDm*
tm.ty.fy sDm
nty bn sw Hr sDm*
tm.ty.fy sDm*
tm.ty.fy sDm*
The form nty + old perfective is used equivalent to the participle but without
referring a such a tense.
* Very rare forms
* Semantically expresses the participles