Professional Documents
Culture Documents
WILFREDO J. GAVARRA
JOAN D.
NAING
Proponent
Noted:
JOAN M. MALALUAN
Secondary School Head Teacher I
Reviewed by:
ANICIA S. MADARANG
EMMA V. DASCO
EPS- I English
Recommending Approval:
JOY G. CABRERA
OIC Chief CID
APPROVED:
WILFREDO J. GAVARRA
WILFREDO J. GAVARRA
JOAN D.
NAING
Proponent
Noted:
JOAN M. MALALUAN
Secondary School Head Teacher I
Reviewed by:
ANICIA S. MADARANG
EMMA V. DASCO
EPS- I English
Recommending Approval:
JOY G. CABRERA
OIC Chief CID
APPROVED:
WILFREDO J. GAVARRA
3
numeracy
and
language
related
competencies
come
in
INSTRUCTIONAL level.
This study is anchored to DepEd Order No. 43, s. 2015 / DepEd Order
No. 39, s 2016 Revised Basic Education Research Fund (BERF) Guidelines
which includes language and learning materials to enhance the teaching-learning
process.
a. literal
b. interpretive
c. Inferential
d. Critical
2.) What are the features of the reading worksheet to be developed that
can help students in improving their reading comprehension skills as to:
a.) contents
b.) designed activities
c.) competencies covered and
d.) assessment?
3.) What are the results of the post-test against the pre-test?
4.) What is the level of effectiveness of the developed reading worksheet
as an innovative reading comprehension enhancement tool as based from
the comparison between the pre-test and post-test results?
V. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
This study will make use of the quasi-experimental method of
research. This method makes use of pre-test and post-test design. It also
requires two groups of respondents-the controlled group and the
experimental group. In this study the experimental group of students will
be exposed to the use of the reading worksheet while the controlled will
only rely on the typical instructions on reading without the use of
innovations like this reading worksheet. This will serve to establish
comparison on the effects of the reading worksheet as a reading
comprehension enhancement tool for the students.
10
Pre-implementation
1.Preparation of
the
Research
Proposal
2. Submission of
the
Research
Proposal
for
approval
3.Revision
(if
any)
4.Implementatio
n of the Research
Proposal
Time
Persons
Success
Frame
Involved
Indicator
November
2016
Proponent,
School Head
Committees,
Chairpersons and
members were
identified
-Revised Proposal
11
Implementation
Phase:
1.Determining
the final list of
the respondents.
2.Seeking
for
Advisers
consent.
3.Orientation to
the respondents
4.Administration
of Pre-test.
4.Administration
of
Post
Test
Collection,
Tabulation,
Analysis
and
Interpretation of
Data
5. Formulation of
Conclusion
and
Recommendation
.
Post-Implementation
Phase
1.Submission of the
2.Accomplishment
Result
3.Revision (If any)
4.Submission
and
Acceptance of the
Final Report
DecemberFebruary
School Head
Proponents,
Respondents
Informed students,
students obtained
the
necessary
knowledge.
School Head,
Proponents
Accomplishment
Report of the
Research
2016 -2017
March
April 2017
VII-COST ESTIMATES
The table below shows the estimated costs of the actual conduct of
this action research study:
Expenses
Estimated Costs
1.) Preparation and formulation
of action research proposal
Php 1,500
2.) Production and Distribution of
the Reading Worksheet
Php 2,000
12
13
JOAN D.
NAING
Proponent
Noted:
JOAN M. MALALUAN
Secondary School Head Teacher I
Reviewed by:
ANICIA S. MADARANG
EMMA V. DASCO
EPS- I English
Recommending Approval:
JOY G. CABRERA
OIC Chief CID
APPROVED:
WILFREDO J. GAVARRA
14
15